Slashdot Mirror


Windows 8 Won't Play DVDs Unless You Pay For the Media Center Pack

An anonymous reader writes "You may already know that Microsoft plans to sell Windows Media Center as a separate, paid pack, but now the company has revealed that Windows 8 will also stop default support for DVD playback. You'll only be able to play DVDs and Blu-rays if you upgrade to the Media Center pack. 'Acquiring either the Windows 8 Media Center Pack or the Windows 8 Pro Pack gives you Media Center, including DVD playback (in Media Center, not in Media Player), broadcast TV recording and playback (DBV-T/S, ISDB-S/T, DMBH, and ATSC), and VOB file playback. Pricing for these Packs, as well as retail versions of Windows 8, will be announced closer to the release date. To give you some indication of Media Center Pack pricing, it will be in line with marginal costs.'" In a comment, Microsoft's Steven Sinofsky elaborates: "(marginal is small, honest, and we just haven't determined the final prices yet based on ongoing work but we are aiming for single digit dollars but we don't control the truly marginal costs). We wanted to include Media Player for everyone without everyone incurring the cost even if they don't even have an optical drive."

23 of 734 comments (clear)

  1. Bad enough I pay for microtransactions in MMO's by crazyjj · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Now I've got to pay for every damned little thing in the OS too.

    What's next, is there going to be an extra $5 charge every time I change the BIOS settings? A $2 charge by the firmware when I add RAM?

    It's like government. No politician has the balls for raise taxes openly and directly, so instead you get a million nickel-and-dime fees and surtaxes to annoy the shit out of you at every turn.

    Just raise the price of Windows if that's what you need to do, MS. I'd much rather a Windows license go from $100 to $120 than to have a window popping up at every turn saying I need to pay for some expansion pack if I want this-or-that little feature to work.

    --
    What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    1. Re:Bad enough I pay for microtransactions in MMO's by Sigma+7 · · Score: 5, Funny

      How about $100 to get a C compiler, just so that you can write any program that isn't grindingly slow?

      Get off my lawn.

    2. Re:Bad enough I pay for microtransactions in MMO's by poet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is actually a very smart move. Microsoft has to pay DVD player manufacturers to allow you to play DVDs. Here is the thing.... in the next 18 months you won't see DVD players on most laptops. Heck mine doesn't even have a CDROM. Even my media center does't use DVDs, I just play an avi file or stream from netflix/amazon.

      Further, you can always use VLC. This really isn't a big deal.

      --
      Get your PostgreSQL here: http://www.commandprompt.com/
    3. Re:Bad enough I pay for microtransactions in MMO's by _avs_007 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't think it's that they are trying to nickel and dime you. I think they were trying to reduce cost of the base OS, by not including the licensing fees for MPEG2.

    4. Re:Bad enough I pay for microtransactions in MMO's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The licensing required to play DVDs or Bluray ain't free, and MS has to cover that cost per license of Windows. Including it, especially when a lot of devices lack optical drives anymore, is just a waste of money. I would expect any device sold that includes a DVD drive or Bluray drive to also include the necessary decoders to allow DVD/Bluray playback.

      Note, this isn't new. Windows XP couldn't play DVDs out of the box either unless you bought a third-party decoder. Windows Vista/7 couldn't play DVDs unless you had an edition that included Media Center, such as Home Premium or Ultimate. The original XBox wouldn't play DVDs unless you bought a remote control which covered the cost of the license.

    5. Re:Bad enough I pay for microtransactions in MMO's by surmak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think it's that they are trying to nickel and dime you. I think they were trying to reduce cost of the base OS, by not including the licensing fees for MPEG2.

      If so, that may be a good thing if it exposes end users to the patent craziness that is screwing up the industry. As the best way to get rid of a bad law is to strictly enforce it, unbundling the MPEG licenses will annoy end users.

    6. Re:Bad enough I pay for microtransactions in MMO's by ByOhTek · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I suspect most manufacturers will do what they do now.

      Provide you with their own player.

      Really, this only affects people who install their own copies of Windows.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    7. Re:Bad enough I pay for microtransactions in MMO's by ghostdoc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      VLC is unaffected. Buy any version of Windows you like, download VLC in 1 minute, watch all the DVD's you want.

      So once again, one division of Microsoft is crippling the marketability of another department's software.

      This is how vast monopolistic empires die, not from outside, but from inside.

      --
      Business/App ideas are like arseholes: everyone's got one, they're mostly shit, but very rarely they contain a diamond
    8. Re:Bad enough I pay for microtransactions in MMO's by slew · · Score: 5, Informative

      Noting the "get-of-my-lawn" comment, perhaps the OP was thinking about Solaris.

      A long time ago (>10 years), Sun (now Oracle) unbundled the C-compiler from the standard Solaris 2.x package and they started charging extra for their Ansi C-compiler (and it might have been $100 come to think about it)... The theory was that you didn't need the compiler if you were just using Solaris for a workstation running pre-compiled apps (there was an old BSD cc around to recompile the kernel, but it was K&R only), but if you were a Wall-street Quant, you had the money to pay extra for the privilage of writing your own code so they were gonna charge you for the privlage. Of couse the pre-compiled GCC binaries worked just fine on Solaris, so it didn't bother most folks who were tinkering with their own code.

    9. Re:Bad enough I pay for microtransactions in MMO's by Endo13 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Additionally, it sounds like they're cutting out the DVD functionality to save the royalty costs, AND that they plan to pass those savings on to customers. Whether that will actually be the case in reality remains to be seen. I'm not a Microsoft fan, but if that is what they end up doing, I have to give them kudos for that.

      For myself, I won't miss DVD playback. My home PCs don't even have optical drives installed. I have a USB DVD drive, which I've used probably less than 5 times in the past year, and only once or twice for DVDs.

      But besides all that, as you pointed out, there's plenty of free software players out there now. I prefer VLC over Media Center anyway.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    10. Re:Bad enough I pay for microtransactions in MMO's by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Here is the thing.... in the next 18 months you won't see DVD players on most laptops.

      Correction:

      In the next 18 months Microsoft will strongarm OEM's into omitting the DVD drives on most laptops.

      It'll be just like in the mid 1990's when Compaq switched the CD drives in their servers from SCSI models to IDE models because Microsoft told them to. And it'll be just like in the late 2000's when Microsoft started forcing netbook manufacturers to lard up the specs on the previously cheap devices because they needed just enough horsepower to run Windows XP.

      Microsoft still has feet over the necks of all major OEM's. Until this problem is corrected, they will still call the shots.

      --
      Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    11. Re:Bad enough I pay for microtransactions in MMO's by ocdude · · Score: 5, Funny

      if it takes Linux 4hrs longer to install vs. windows, its' not cost effective.

      Dude, you're doing it wrong.

    12. Re:Bad enough I pay for microtransactions in MMO's by marcosdumay · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you look at how much time it takes to install Linux compared to Windows and reinstall everytime there's an update, you are really not truly saving any money.

      Are you just missinformed, right? You are repeating MS's propaganda just because it is the only thing you ever readed, right?

      The point is, you don't reinstall Linux. When a new version comes out, you upgrade (that means, you log as root and type aptitude dist-upgrade, or whatever applies to your distro - I know, Windows users have a differenet meaning for the word "upgrade"), when you change your hardware, you simply put your disk on the new machine, when you replace your disk, you simply copy the contents to the new disk.

      I can think about 2 exceptions. When Linux switched to 2.6 a few distros didn't upgrade clearly, and when people started to adopt 64 bit distros it was easier to reinstall than to switch everything. Compare that with Windows, that still self destructs after a few months.

  2. The way the market has gone by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The headline is trying to incite a backlash, but this is a reflection of the decline of optical drives and the rise of tablets. Apple has also gone down this path by not including optical drives in the MacBook Air. I don't find myself that concerned since it's literally been years since I watched a DVD, and all my movies are digital.

    Presumably, the expense that was previously included in the cost of Windows will not be in Windows 8. I say "presumably" because I'm sure Windows 8 will still inexplicably cost over $100 or whatever.

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
    1. Re:The way the market has gone by gl4ss · · Score: 5, Insightful

      it would still be nice to view dvd .iso's ;)

      ah well just download vlc. media player is a piece of shit anyways.. and the marginal costs are the license costs.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  3. And I bet they'll pass those savings on! by Ndkchk · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sure that Microsoft will be generous and actually pass on these savings to the consumer, right? I mean, they wouldn't just cut out a feature to save some money and then keep that money for themselves, would they?

  4. Three Letters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    VLC

  5. Incorrect article. by Haxagon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The OS won't play DVDs in Media Center-- because it's not included. MS said that they were confident that the PC DVD-playing software market was sufficiently full.
    Windows 8 will still play DVDs with third-party-software. There's no reason to have such an inflammatory article.

  6. XBMC FTW by dmacleod808 · · Score: 5, Informative

    On top of all the VLC comments above... if you want a *Free* media center alternative... XBMC is the way to go.

    --
    There Can Be Only One...
  7. bundling by bigdavex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If Microsoft bundles software, that's bad.
    If Microsoft doesn't bundle software, that bad.

    Is everything Microsoft does wrong by definition?

    --
    -Dave
  8. Good. Keep reducing the flow of money to MPEGLA by westyvw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I really dislike Microsoft, I have no need for windows anything, but I dislike MPEGLA even more. As far as I am concerned, its good news that they will no longer be recieving license fees automatically from Microsoft.

  9. Re:What the heck, is this the 1980's again? by dexomn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Somewhere PowerDVD is wringing it's hands and cackling madly in it's secret lair.

  10. I'm usually quick to criticize Microsoft... by Benfea · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...but in this instance, they're making the right decision.

    Long ago, Microsoft would drive entire markets out of business with a particular tactic. Every time some innovative software developer produced something new and useful enough to create a whole new market (or sub-market or whatever you want to call it), Microsoft would barge in, create a similar product, and offer it for free with their operating system.

    Countless innovative software companies were driven out of business this way. Whole markets dried up and blew away. I and many others lambasted Microsoft for stifling innovation in the software market by doing this, and I still think those complaints against Microsoft were valid. So now people are whining at Microsoft for doing precisely the opposite? Damned if they do, damned if they don't.

    So you'll have to take the extra step of installing a free piece of software to perform the same function, a function that is becoming increasingly irrelevant in this new world of digital streaming. You'll survive.

    I find it highly ironic that you are whining about not getting something for free given the rightist drivel in your sig.