Slashdot Mirror


How Romanian Fortune Tellers Used Google To Fleece Victims

Hentes writes "The internet has made many things easier, but unfortunately this also includes crime: it seems that nowadays not even people wanting to know their future are safe from fraud. Two fortune tellers are being investigated, after the Romanian police uncovered that they have utilized some extraordinary help in their clairvoyant acts. The pair used information collected from internet search and social networks to gain the trust of their customers, claiming that they could see their personal data through their crystal ball. In some cases, they also used high-tech surveillance techniques such as hidden cameras and phone tapping. But they didn't stop at merely spying on their victims: their most bizarre case involved a scuba diver dressed as a monster." Nice to know that internet-based fraud isn't limited to motivational speakers with real-estate seminars and other get-rich-quick flim-flam.

140 comments

  1. It's a foregone conclusion by xrayspx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "it seems that nowadays not even people wanting to know their future are safe from fraud"

    If you pay someone money and expect them to tell your future, you will never be safe from fraud. In fact, as your palm reading crystal adviser, I sense...fraud...in your future.

    1. Re:It's a foregone conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's the joke.

    2. Re:It's a foregone conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not necessarily. It isn't impossible that the fortune teller really believes they can tell the future. If both the client and the fortune teller believe the magic, it isn't fraud.
      That said, I doubt most fortune tellers believe they can see the future. Gypsies surely don't.

    3. Re:It's a foregone conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, i know, i read that and thought that is the stupidest thing i've read in a long, long time.

    4. Re:It's a foregone conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you pay someone money and expect them to tell your future, you will never be safe from fraud.

      Doctors, lawyers, bankers and politicians disagree strongly with you.

      But that doesn't make you less right.

    5. Re:It's a foregone conclusion by Arancaytar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No fortune teller believes in their own powers any more than a stage magician does. To provide customers with a skillful illusion requires the awareness of building the illusion - the fortune teller has to cold-read their customer, provide vague hints and leading questions.

      That said, a fortune teller doesn't have to be a fraud any more than a stage magician does; it can be a nice form of entertainment. The difference is that far less customers believe in stage illusions than in fortune telling, and fortune tellers - once they have stumbled across a gullible customer - will often proceed to fleece them for everything they own.

    6. Re:It's a foregone conclusion by Dexter+Herbivore · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No fortune teller believes in their own powers...

      You under estimate the power of self delusion.

    7. Re:It's a foregone conclusion by mrmeval · · Score: 1, Troll

      No it's only a foregone conclusion for inebriated halfwits who'd choose their doctor from a police line up of serial killers.

      The better ones are the ones that you get to know usually through a network of acquaintances. They've been practicing for at least a decade after apprenticing that long. They will have a business license. They have a fixed place of business and fixed prices.They will do standard horoscope and can do the base 12 math. They work with you on interpretation and the results get better as you learn to do the interpretations yourself though they are there to teach and advise. They are professionals and will have solid certificates in what is obtainable for most laypeople such as licensed physical therapist, licensed reflexologist and other certifications that may or may not have state licensing. Some will have counseling degrees and/or psychology degree. There are no formal requirements.

      Having your fortune read is as much a journey as picking a psychologist or other doctor. The 'fortune teller' has as much ability to do you harm as any medical practitioner so chose them as wisely as you choose your doctors.

      I would not have said that a few years ago. They were lumped in with all the other huckers, grifters and frauds. I've met a few people who are not that. I've run out of words.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    8. Re:It's a foregone conclusion by am+2k · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No fortune teller believes in their own powers any more than a stage magician does.

      I actually know someone personally who does believe in her own future prediction power. How I can be sure? She makes financially obviously unsound decisions like selling her nearly-new car, etc. because of some calculations she did based on the current locations of some molten rocks in the sky. She actually has to run a special Win 3.1 program for that, because it's the only one which does the calculations she needs.

      To provide customers with a skillful illusion requires the awareness of building the illusion - the fortune teller has to cold-read their customer, provide vague hints and leading questions.

      Generally yes, but you can learn to do that unconsciously, to the point where you can do that successfully on yourself. You just have to really believe in it.

    9. Re:It's a foregone conclusion by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      If you pay someone money and expect them to tell your future, you will never be safe from fraud. In fact, as your palm reading crystal adviser, I sense...fraud...in your future.

      Is it actually a fraud when any sane and reasonable person knows what is going on?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    10. Re:It's a foregone conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No fortune teller believes in their own powers any more than a stage magician does.

      Not true. I bet Steve Jobs actually believed in his powers equally firmly as his followers. It's only human. If you happen to hit several major successes, you can't help but feel you have superpowers.

      A lot of powerful people have bullshitted their way to the top. I bet most of them started to believe in their self-fulfilling profecies somewhere along the way.

    11. Re:It's a foregone conclusion by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      She actually has to run a special Win 3.1 program for that, because it's the only one which does the calculations she needs.

      What's the program? Sounds like there might be some money in recoding those calculations into a nice shiny iPhone app...

    12. Re:It's a foregone conclusion by am+2k · · Score: 1

      What's the program? Sounds like there might be some money in recoding those calculations into a nice shiny iPhone app...

      I don't know, and I'm unable to ask (due to something unrelated to this). However, I guess the application isn't that popular even among astrologers, since otherwise the original programmer would likely have rewritten it using a more modern approach.

    13. Re:It's a foregone conclusion by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      What's the program? Sounds like there might be some money in recoding those calculations into a nice shiny iPhone app...

      I don't know, and I'm unable to ask (due to something unrelated to this). However, I guess the application isn't that popular even among astrologers, since otherwise the original programmer would likely have rewritten it using a more modern approach.

      However, someone put a curse on his money and his computer.

      --

      Eight posts from now, this thread will be cursed with Michael Kristopeit.

    14. Re:It's a foregone conclusion by asdf7890 · · Score: 1
      since otherwise the original programmer would likely have rewritten it using a more modern approach

      There are several good counter arguments for that.

      The program is most likely fifteen years or more old - the original programmer may have long since moved on and no longer programs, are has had a change of mind/heart over the whole future prediction thing. Heck maybe they managed to predict the lottery results, if so why would they now need to work on that astrology stuff now?

      The programmer may have released it for free, or shareware and never go much response in terms of payments or support requests. They may not know that their little program was (and perhaps still is) a sleeper hit.

      Perhaps the program's creator was a "futurologist" (or what-ever people like that are calling themselves this year because last year's term is already attracting unwanted bad press regarding fraud) and originally intended the program to drive business but instead found it drew people away (if you can DIY, why pay for someone else to interpret the results?) so the project was abandoned.

      If someone is going through the hassle of getting an old 16-bit Windows app to run in a modern environment then there is definitely demand and even if there are only a few people with that high drive to use the calcs there are most likely a great many who would take a more casual interest and pay a few $ for a novelty app for their smartphone or tablet. Of course anyone wrting such an app would have to skirt a moral question: while you know 99.99% of the apps users will consider it an amusing little distraction for 30 seconds of their day and nothing more, someone somewhere will make drastic life-changing decisions for the worse based upon the results. Personally I'd file that under "no my problem, get that person to an institute stat", but other people would not and you may have trouble getting it into Apple's app store, amongst others, for that reason.

    15. Re:It's a foregone conclusion by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 2

      No fortune teller believes in their own powers...

      You under estimate the power of self delusion.

      If you're using Google, Facebook, etc as an information source it's a pretty clear indication that your real power is lying to your victims.

    16. Re:It's a foregone conclusion by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      Heck maybe they managed to predict the lottery results, if so why would they now need to work on that astrology stuff now?

      Yeah, if someone really could predict the future, get an edge at gambling, et cetera - they wouldn't need to hustle people a few (or several) bucks at a time.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    17. Re:It's a foregone conclusion by houghi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I actually know someone personally who does believe in her own future prediction power.

      I know a whole industry that believes they can tell the future. How I can be sure? They makes financially obviously unsound decisions like buying/selling their stock, etc. because of some calculations they did based on an algorithm.
      They actually has to run a special programs for that, because it's the only one which does the calculations they need.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    18. Re:It's a foregone conclusion by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      I always use Google Sky Map. Aha! Mercury is in the Ascendant on the Whale. Ooh and Neptune is close to Aquarius.

      Here's my prediction based on Google Sky Map: avoid water. There is a Whale in your future together with Neptune, God of the Sea. There is also a light (Aquarius, enlightenment) in your future so you will probably light a match to see what's going on after being swallowed. This will explode the whale, killing you.

      My advice: stay away from seas and aquariums. Now give me 50 bucks :)

      (Yeah I know old school astrologists use a different set of signs. I'm modern though :))

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    19. Re:It's a foregone conclusion by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      Maybe in the cited case, but even then you encounter too many people who claim they're just filling in the gaps in their own very real powers, or just priming their special gift with some data they look up because they find "it works better then". Even in the clear ripoff cases the ripoff artists can have some very weird descriptions of what they're doing.

      This isn't a situation where the smart people with a good understanding of what makes a scientific hypothesis, are fooling those who don't have this understanding.

    20. Re:It's a foregone conclusion by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Come and see. Someone in the middle of being long grifted.

      When did you first begin to trust your 'fortune teller'?

      What was the first 'slightly preposterous' thing they got you to buy into?

      Would you like a free personality test?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    21. Re:It's a foregone conclusion by cusco · · Score: 1

      I hear a "Woosh" in your future . . .

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    22. Re:It's a foregone conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How I can be sure? She makes financially obviously unsound decisions like selling her nearly-new car, etc. because of some calculations she did based on the current locations of some molten rocks in the sky. She actually has to run a special Win 3.1 program for that,

      Well, there you go. It's not that astrology doesn't work, nor that she's a bad astrologer; it's just buggy Windows 3.1 that is to blame.

    23. Re:It's a foregone conclusion by kmoser · · Score: 1

      I think it's a legacy version of Microsoft Money.

    24. Re:It's a foregone conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps the program predicted it should not be updated past win 3.1 :p

    25. Re:It's a foregone conclusion by vandamme · · Score: 1

      Actually, that works, because a lot of people are doing the same.

  2. Anyone really surprised by this? by msgmonkey · · Score: 2

    After finding out there are people buying spell casting services overy ebay in their thousands this is not surprising at all. A fool and his/her money is quickly seperated.

    1. Re:Anyone really surprised by this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You should always attribute your quotations. That's Steve Jobs, right?

    2. Re:Anyone really surprised by this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We ought to start a business, we could cast a good luck spell on our clients for $20. It lasts for a month, after which, you need another $20 for the next month. But if you act now we'll bundle the deal and provide a one year promotional contract for half price. For an additional $5/mo we'll double the potency of good luck, instead of ten units of good luck you'll get twenty.

    3. Re:Anyone really surprised by this? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      He never actually said it in public. Trade secret, see.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:Anyone really surprised by this? by azalin · · Score: 1

      The trick is to make the fool happy with his choice and to inspire more fools to follow along his path.

    5. Re:Anyone really surprised by this? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Apple are working on this. It'll be integrated with a Feng-shui app, a subluxation detector & a method for ordering homeopathic medicines online[1].

      It'll be called iCon.

      [1] Apple will get 30% plus 30% of the rest plus 30% of the rest plus 30% of the rest plus 30% of the rest plus 30% of the rest plus 30% of the rest plus 30% of the rest plus 30% of the rest.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:Anyone really surprised by this? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Steve Jobs: 'A fool and their money were lucky to get together in the first place!'

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re:Anyone really surprised by this? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Steve Jobs: 'A fool and their money were lucky to get together in the first place!'

      Pluralis majestatis?

      Ah, right, the customer is king (but as we believe in democracy, the king is allowed spend money, but otherwise must be completely disempowered).

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  3. Surprising how old the techniques are by Grayhand · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Really it's just an update of what has been going on since at least the mid 1800s. Back then they would question friends and relatives and check newspapers and birth records. Even the diver isn't all that different from having some one dress up as a ghost or having a veil on a string dance around. People believe even lame gags because they want to believe. The internet like with most things just makes it quicker and easier.

    1. Re:Surprising how old the techniques are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have a source for it, but in one of my lectures a history professor told us about stuff like that happening in ancient Greece.

    2. Re:Surprising how old the techniques are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geography fail. There's Bulgaria in between them.

    3. Re:Surprising how old the techniques are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You must be American, right ?

    4. Re:Surprising how old the techniques are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really it's just an update of what has been going on since at least the mid 1800s. Back then they would question friends and relatives and check newspapers and birth records. Even the diver isn't all that different from having some one dress up as a ghost or having a veil on a string dance around. People believe even lame gags because they want to believe. The internet like with most things just makes it quicker and easier.

      I was going to say, "Everything old is new again." The idea of getting "psychic" information from newspapers, obituaries, birth records and even cemeteries is hundreds of years old. At an early point in his career, Harry Houdini did the same. "Homo vult decipi; decipiatur" - man wishes to be deceived; deceive him.

  4. "... a scuba diver dressed as a monster ..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    And they would have got away with it too, if it wasn't for those darn meddling kids!

  5. superstition and religion by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    Superstition and religion will always find a platform. Don't get "the Internet" involved in this please. If people want to believe something, it's their right and if they want to pay money to others to tell them what to believe, it's their right too. If some person or group is able to make a career out of that, fine. As long as they keep it private and don't change the law over it, or start wars, I don't see a problem with that.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    1. Re:superstition and religion by Barsteward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There us no need to separate Superstition and religion, they are the same thing.

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    2. Re:superstition and religion by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ridiculous.

      I mean, you don't get a tax exemption for always putting your left shoe on first, do you?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:superstition and religion by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Informative

      No they are not. A religion is an organisation based on superstition. Saying they are the same thing is like saying that corporations and capitalism are the same thing.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  6. Am I the only one who did a double take... by Biff+Stu · · Score: 3, Informative

    after first thinking the article was about Romulan fortune tellers.

  7. How they told your fortune by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    They used Japanese ATMs

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  8. Steve are you there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Olga sits at her desk with her clients holding hand in a circle around her Ipad ...the candle flickers....One of the clients desperately wants to speak to Steve about why suddenly his Mac Book Pro is vulnerable to the "curse of the Open Windows"

    Olga says she senses an evil presence in the room and that Steve is telling her that there is something very wrong with her clients Mac Book Pro and that it will only be free from evil when he removes boot camp and returns to the pure essence of Apple!

    Olga takes her 200 dollar malware removal fee, 20% of which is paid to Symantec for setting her up in business.

    I see many scenes like this happening to Mac users in the future.

  9. Yes... by meglon · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... because the fortune teller trade has always before been a bastion of honesty and integrity, and has never been the butt of scurrilous rumors of fraud.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  10. As opposed to the traditional fortune tellers? by blind+biker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Every and all fortune teller is committing fraud - these were just higher-tech than the rest.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:As opposed to the traditional fortune tellers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. A psychiatric patient could believe he was able to tell the future, and make a good-faith attempt to do so. This would not be fraud.

    2. Re:As opposed to the traditional fortune tellers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would still be fraud.

      Much like with insanity, there is both a legal and medical/professional definition of the word.

      Just because someone is medically considered to be mentally insane does not always mean he's not legally culpable of his actions.

      Just because one can not be send to jail for fraud doesn't make it any less fraud.

    3. Re:As opposed to the traditional fortune tellers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Yes, ah, I must say, it was pretty obvious you were going to post that ... comment" - Gilderoy Lockhart

    4. Re:As opposed to the traditional fortune tellers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not legally. Those that believe themselves lacks intent... ;)

    5. Re:As opposed to the traditional fortune tellers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deuteronomy 18:10-13

      There shall not be found among you anyone who burns his son or his daughter as an offering, anyone who practices divination or tells fortunes or interprets omens, or a sorcerer or a charmer or a medium or a necromancer or one who inquires of the dead, for whoever does these things is an abomination to the Lord.

  11. the internet can make you smarter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but most people are just as stupid as they were before the internet.

  12. Who does this surprise ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, palmistry crystal ball and stuff related are at best "entertainment" (*snort*) at worst downright fraud. No, let me correct that, they are simply most of the time fraud, and rarely used as entertainment. They are usually a combo of cold and hot reading.

  13. Re:Romania ... by Atti+K. · · Score: 2

    Yes dumbass, we have Internet. It's dirt cheap and very fast. I pay less than 10 euros for an FTTB connection which goes up to 100 Mbps. At least we are good at something.

    --
    .sig: No such file or directory
  14. Suckers are born every second by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2

    Ever since the dawn of time there have been suckers

    And that's the only reason why con artists thrive all through the millennia

    The Net is a tool, use by everyone, including the con artists - and the suckers?

    Well ... suckers are _still_ falling into the Nigerian money transfer scam, don't they?

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Suckers are born every second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Well ... suckers are _still_ falling into the Nigerian money transfer scam, don't they?"

      Not to mention talking snakes, virgin mothers and bearded men in the sky.

    2. Re:Suckers are born every second by Immerman · · Score: 2

      To be fair, nobody actually has evidence *against* any of those (yeah, yeah, can't prove a negative etc.) and they're not an ongoing phenomena so can't really be tested at all. On the other hand psychics of all stripes have been fleecing suckers throughout history* and not one has ever been proven effective. Tip: when hiring a psychic be sure you ask them why they haven't yet claimed the million-dollar prize that's been waiting for years for the first person to demonstrate paranormal abilities that can survive a double-blind test.

      *I would guess that the practice likely has it's roots with the tribal shaman throwing the bones to receive advice from the spirit world (or some variant thereof), which I think doesn't actually count as fleecing suckers but was rather a matter of the best-educated** person in the tribe using a certain amount of theatre to help his advice hold weight among the hotheads and short-sighted idiots. If you need evidence for the necessity of such a thing just look around today when we have a society built around scientific advances and yet the advice of scientists is largely ignored even when there's a near-unanimous consensus.

      ** Yes, educated. In addition to being a priest a shaman was quite often the tribe's doctor, historian, and all around holder of subtle knowledge. Sure there was a lot of superstition, but there was also a lot of factual knowledge which was hard-won over countless generations and could be preserved only in living memory.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  15. Re:Romania ... by itsme1234 · · Score: 2

    "Borat" wasn't a documentary, if you can't make the difference please don't watch "Zombie Apocalypse" or anything similar. For your own good.

  16. Re:Romania ... by hvm2hvm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know I'm only feeding the troll but why not try a wikipedia search for Romania first?

    Also, it pains me that they call those fortune tellers Romanian since they're actually gypsies. This is a huge problem for us, the gypsies go in other countries, pull shit like this and worse (stealing, beating people up) and then they say they're Romanian. Everyone thinks Romania is a gypsy country or something.

    --
    ics
  17. That's a bit narrow-minded, I think by F69631 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm an engineer and been atheist my whole life, so I don't believe in horoscopes/crystals/palm reading/etc... However, I've found that I immensely enjoy occasional tarot sessions. I don't believe any of that outside those sessions but every once in a while, it's nice to meet someone more spiritual than I am, light a few candles, smoke a bit of tobacco from a bong, engage in the whole tarot ritual (sliding fingers on the deck, etc.), have her read the cards for me and then reflect on how to interpret that all based on my history and expectations for the future.

    It's almost therapeutic to completely suspend your disbelief every once in a while and get in touch with the spiritual side (I think that there is a certain mental state that every human - no matter how skeptic, etc. - can achieve if they want to... and it's pretty pleasant, really). As long as you keep it at that and don't ever start to think that you could actually make important decisions based on all that, it's pretty much the most harmless source of enjoyment that there is.

    So, if people want that and what they get is that someone wiretaps their phones, installs hidden cameras to their apartment, etc... it's not okay to say "Well, what did they expect? Of course they're going to get scammed!"

    1. Re:That's a bit narrow-minded, I think by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      "It's almost therapeutic to completely suspend your disbelief every once in a while..."

      True, and I completely agree with the general sentiment of what you say.

      But when someone says it's real, they (not a joke) imply a warranty, and fraud charges are the frequent result.

      If it is clearly stated that the service is "for entertainment purposes only", and no other claims are made, then it's a perfectly legitimate operation. It's the others that run afoul of our standards of business.

      If it * IS * labeled "for entertainment only", then you can decide for yourself at what level you prefer to be entertained. Anything else, and that decision is distorted or diluted. But THEN, they can claim all the reality they want, and say later it's just part of the act, for entertainment purposes.

      And anybody who is taken in by that pretty much deserves to be taken in by that. The world -- and laws -- are and should be geared toward reasonably normal and reasonably reasonable people. Anything else has always resulted in problems.

    2. Re:That's a bit narrow-minded, I think by Zapotek · · Score: 1, Troll

      Let me guess...lonely geek has a crush on pretty tarrot reader, right?

    3. Re:That's a bit narrow-minded, I think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just channeled a message for F69631, you have spiritually grown past all this now and need to go get your own Tarrot Deck $15, quit hassling the spiritual women and grow up, they are not your personal shrink, and they hate it when you smoke their shit up.

      http://www.amazon.com/Giant-Rider-Waite-Tarot-Arthur-Edward/dp/tags-on-product/0880794747

      Candles are available at your supermarket
      Check weedmaps for your smoke
      One extra Item.... A mirror.

      Next time you want a tarrot session, you can look in the mirror and reflect on just how fucked up your own life has become. When you finally cry. Then you can layout your Tarrot deck to ask your own questions cast your own deck. Trust me when I say it's for your betterment.

      If you feel this message has spiritually awaken you, and you want one final spiritual awaken, the great juju. just sell your house, and donate liberally to Sakawa Boyz in Ghana.

      (sark all the way)

    4. Re:That's a bit narrow-minded, I think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot.

    5. Re:That's a bit narrow-minded, I think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Your predilection for therapeutic periods of willful ignorance do not equate to insight. Fortune-telling does not cease to be hokum because you find a hookah relaxing.

    6. Re:That's a bit narrow-minded, I think by RogL · · Score: 1

      I'm an engineer and been atheist my whole life, so I don't believe in horoscopes/crystals/palm reading/etc... However, I've found that I immensely enjoy occasional tarot sessions. I don't believe any of that outside those sessions but every once in a while, it's nice to meet someone more spiritual than I am, light a few candles, smoke a bit of tobacco from a bong, engage in the whole tarot ritual (sliding fingers on the deck, etc.), have her read the cards for me and then reflect on how to interpret that all based on my history and expectations for the future.

      It's almost therapeutic to completely suspend your disbelief every once in a while and get in touch with the spiritual side (I think that there is a certain mental state that every human - no matter how skeptic, etc. - can achieve if they want to... and it's pretty pleasant, really). As long as you keep it at that and don't ever start to think that you could actually make important decisions based on all that, it's pretty much the most harmless source of enjoyment that there is.

      Sounds like you use tarot readings as a more-fun therapy session: reflecting on what's going on in your life, where you'd like to head, and what to do about it. As long as you treat it more like a campy discussion & less like mystical powers, you're in good shape.

    7. Re:That's a bit narrow-minded, I think by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      that would be part of the entertainment value

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    8. Re:That's a bit narrow-minded, I think by Zapotek · · Score: 1

      It was a joke.

    9. Re:That's a bit narrow-minded, I think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only time I have seen someone do Tarot readings (random person at a party), that is basically how they presented it. That seems like a pretty reasonable way to use Tarot cards to me.

    10. Re:That's a bit narrow-minded, I think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get into that mood by watching a good movie. I don't really call it 'spiritual' so much as 'fantasy', and there's nothing wrong with it as long as it's sensible. When people start to take the shit seriously (just as someone starts to play an MMORPG obsessively, or drink to blacking out, or etc.), then there's problems.

    11. Re:That's a bit narrow-minded, I think by Zaelath · · Score: 1

      I'm an engineer and have been straight my whole life, so I don't believe in rimming/rusty trombones/etc.... However, I've found that I immensely enjoy occasional gay sex. I don't believe any of that outside those sessions, but every once in a while, it's nice to meet someone gayer than I am, like a few candles, smoke a bit of tobacco from a bong, engage in the whole gay sex ritual (sliding fingers on the sack, etc.), have him toss my salad and then reflect on how to interpret that all based on my history and expectations for the future.

      It's almost therapeutic to completely suspend your disbelief every once in a while and get in touch with the gay side (I think that there is a certain mental state that every human - no matter how skeptic, etc. - can achieve if they want to... and it's pretty pleasant, really). As long as you keep it at that and don't ever start to think that you could actually make important decisions based on all that, it's pretty much the most harmless source of enjoyment that there is.

      So, if people want that and what they get is that someone wiretaps their phones, installs hidden cameras to their apartment, etc... it's not okay to say "Well, what did they expect? Of course they're going to get rimmed!"

  18. My favourite part of the article... by omega6 · · Score: 1

    "As well as fraud the pair are also facing charges under the National Security Act for using illegal professional surveillance equipment," What is professional surveillance equipment?

    1. Re:My favourite part of the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "tapping phone calls" is done with professional surveillance equipment and that's illegal

    2. Re:My favourite part of the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) get a dictionary
      2) RTFA, you imbecile.

    3. Re:My favourite part of the article... by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Any equipment of a better quality than what the government is using. In Romania, that's probably a satchel VHS camera with a stage microphone taped to the window.

      --
      Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
    4. Re:My favourite part of the article... by Alumoi · · Score: 1

      But in Romania is only takes a small bribe to get the tapes.

    5. Re:My favourite part of the article... by cristiroma · · Score: 0

      In Romania, that's probably a satchel VHS camera with a stage microphone taped to the window.

      Dear bruce, Stop being an asshole and do your homework before posting your shitty ironies. Romania is on the top 5 (FIVE) countries on the Internet connection speed, while at its borders uses the most advanced security surveillance system among EU countries (being at the EU border). I'll let you do the research, seems you're way behind.

    6. Re:My favourite part of the article... by cristiroma · · Score: 1

      In Romania, that's probably a satchel VHS camera with a stage microphone taped to the window.

      Dear bruce, Stop being an assole and keep your irony for yourself. Romanian is among top five countries on Internet connection speed. And regarding security, it has best border surveillance systems among EU countries. Oh, and please do you research first ...

    7. Re:My favourite part of the article... by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 2

      Dear Cris, sorry if I touched a nerve there, but that was a joke dude.

      --
      Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
  19. Dog and Cat excrement on you Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oddly enough this only happens if you make them use bing search on a page.

  20. Re:Romania ... by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    You might not know this, but a common comedic technique is to base things pretty closely on the truth.

    See: "Royle Family", "The Office" and (allegedly) "Yes, [Prime] Minister."

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  21. I've been watching too much DS9 on Netflix by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

    ...and thought exactly the same thing.

    "Romulans. They're so predictably treacherous!"

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  22. How Jewish Fortune Tellers Used Wall Street To... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How Jewish Fortune Tellers Used Wall Street To Fleece WASPs

    Madoff, Goldman, Sachs, et cetera...

    The point is, why mention the nationality? Isn't it bad as it is?

    Promises of riches occur in the Wall Street too, with about as little chance of success in the hand of petty merchants like Madoff.

  23. People just don't care anymore by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    Is this even new?

    When I tell some, they have to watch their PC better, against trojans and virusses, I get the reaction: "who cares? it's only data!" or "I don't got anything to hide" or "There is not that much important on my PC"; While it's THEIR privacy which is at stake and THEIR pc is getting (ab)used to breach the privacy/security of others.

    Lots of people just don't care anymore about stuff which they don't understand; as long "as it works" it's allright for them ..

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  24. William "Canada Bill" Jones quote by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 3, Funny

    "It is immoral to let a sucker keep his money". Apparently, the Romanian scammer fortune-tellers agree.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    1. Re:William "Canada Bill" Jones quote by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I've used that quote for years without knowing it's source.

      BTW I agree.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:William "Canada Bill" Jones quote by Fixadate · · Score: 1

      Look at the other side too - people at this modern age still go to these people to know their future - its just not common people but big business houses too - its amazing that " Fortune telling" has become a big industry now - lot many are making money i mean really good money out of it - cause there are dumb people who are ready with their cheque books - Just think - last year a fortune seller in the city died of car accident - Well only if he really knew the future -

  25. Romainian Fortune Tellers are pussies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Sakawa Boys Will Tear Them Up!
    Sakawa Boys Do this ground work all the time, not much different than "Romance scam."
    Sakawa is religion, practitioners work hard, it's amazing unbelievable the article never mentioned Sakawa.
    Sakawa Boys even have Music CD's out! Romainian Fortune Tellers are pussies in comparison, getting caught, being prosecuted Bla.. fuck all that..

    Slashdot should go to Ghana get us some updated juju and snakes.
    http://www.vice.com/motherboard/mbd-vbs-the-sakawa-boys

  26. Re:Romania ... by pandronic · · Score: 1, Interesting

    And to add insult to injury they are calling themselves Rroma instead of Gypsies, because they claim that the word Gypsy is demeaning and not politically correct.

    The irony is that, in the Romanian language the word Gypsy ("tigan") is purely descriptive of their ethnicity (same as words like German, French or Romanian), but in time began to have a bad connotation because of the way Gypsies behaved (all sort of cons, small time crime, corruption etc). So came a time when they decided to rebrand themselves.

    According to Wikipedia, "rom" means "man" in their language, while the name Romania comes from "Rome" (a 19th century reference to the fact that the Romanian people is Latin). Gypsies from Romania were quick to capitalize on this coincidence recommending themselves as Romanians when it suited them, which became a problem for legitimate Romanian citizens traveling abroad in many Western states for purposes other than begging, stealing, coning and raping.

    The big problem is that their traditional culture is very strong and they can't be educated (eduction is free and mandatory in Romania, still they refuse it) and integrated into the Romanian and European societies. I think a people is beyond hope when they cripple their own children to earn more money from begging and when they throw their their children in front of more expensive cars to blackmail the drivers. Another problem is that they multiply like rabbits - there's no concept of birth control whatsoever and the state supports the kids and the mothers with some ridiculously small subventions (but when your main source of income is stealing copper wires and railroad tracks, I suppose every bit counts).

  27. Intro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The internet has made many things easier, but unfortunately this also includes crime"

    Stupidest introduction statement ever.
    While we're at it, cars are useful unfortunately they also cause accidents and chocolate bars are delicious but they also make you fat.

  28. Re:Romania ... by itsme1234 · · Score: 1

    Even if the pretended documentary would be close to the truth for the sake of whatever technique this still wouldn't say anything about Romania; you can gather as much if you knew at least the full title of the movie, which is "Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan".

  29. Yes. by warrax_666 · · Score: 1

    Defrauding mentally ill or retarded people is still fraud.

    --
    HAND.
    1. Re:Yes. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more of people complaining that "How was I supposed to know that that man was a fraud? He said he wasn't." Since there is no chance of any claim to having supernatural powers being true, it must be an act, by definition. People don't seem to be suing theaters and TV stations for actors not being the characters they play too often, they just sit back and enjoy the show like everybody else does.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  30. Re:Romania ... by jgrahn · · Score: 1

    Also, it pains me that they call those fortune tellers Romanian since they're actually gypsies. This is a huge problem for us, the gypsies go in other countries, pull shit like this and worse (stealing, beating people up) and then they say they're Romanian.

    They come here in the summers, panhandling. Actually, what they say is they are persecuted by the majority romanians.

    Everyone thinks Romania is a gypsy country or something.

    Well, you seem to have a fairly large minority of them.

  31. the story sounds fishy by unami · · Score: 3

    although i live in austria, i've never heard of the "austrian times" (and it's really not that big a country). also, the story lacks information about where this has happened (except that the fortune tellers are romanian), and i would't be the least bit surprised if the pictures from the two women were random stock photos. i'd take this story with at least a grain of salt...

    1. Re:the story sounds fishy by Internal+Modem · · Score: 1

      Good point. There are no names given for any authorities, and only the "witches" first names are used. Also, the "Austrian Times" is an exact mirror of croatiantimes.com, romaniantimes.at, salzburgtimes.at, viennatimes.at, and austrianindependent.com.

    2. Re:the story sounds fishy by cristiroma · · Score: 1

      Actually, the pictures are real ... These gipsy romanian frauds are often in the news here ...

  32. I've seen every episode of Trek by willworkforbeer · · Score: 1

    And I don't recall the average Romulan ever being quite this sneaky. I'm betting she's Tal Shiar.

    --
    Pretending this is my office full of bitter coworkers..
  33. Re:Romania ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Romania couldn't be a gypsy country. I swear they ALL live here in the midwest U.S. There are damn near as many stinking palm readers as bars.Not really, but there are many. The other day in the grocery store a bunch walk in and shop their carts full, then just start pushing them out to a Chev.Suburban. One of them is "trying " to keep the manager busy inside, but believe me he NOTICED! Anyway they piled in the truck and fled just before the local donut pigs could get around to it.Scamming,stealing,self entitled stinking gypsies. Probably the only "race" Hitler was right about.
          If we are clever and lucky, we can "mistakenly" deport them will all the illegal Mexicans once legislation has a sudden outbreak of common sense.

  34. Fortune tellers using internet since 1980s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least one, that I know of, was using the internet before most people knew there was an "internet."

  35. Re:Romania ... by houghi · · Score: 1

    If they have a Romanian passport, they are Romanian.
    If they are descendent from people who lived in Romania, then many feel it is OK to call them Romanian.

    The first I can agree with. The second not so much. The we all would be Etheopians. Jay Leno is not Italian. He is American.

    And don't even get me started on the racial issue. Why must somebody who has 3 grand parents from Sweden (all of them blonde and blue eyed) be called an African American?

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  36. Re:Romania ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Just because most of your telecommunication infrastructure was built way after you got rid of the asshat.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  37. Re:Romania ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    You mean it wasn't ok to shoot my neighbor when he asked whether the fuck I have some brain in that skull of mine?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  38. Re:Romania ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Dude, forget it. Apparently the US people were told to believe that pretty much all of Europe was left in the middle ages and only they had some semblance of electricity.

    No kidding, at my first trip over I was asked whether I know how to operate a toaster. And that was AFTER they contacted me via internet and email...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  39. Tags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crime, Fraud, Humor

    :)

  40. Re:Romania ... by Hentes · · Score: 1

    I did mention their ethnicity but it was apparently censored from the final post. Strange, as it's also in the article, and the pictures in it. Still, the first thing you notice upon entering Romania is that there are gipsies everywhere, and not even the somewhat settled ones but wandering nomadic tribes, beggar mafias, child labour etc. Many are sick, and from what I could tell there are many that starve. It can be argued whose fault it is, but from the eye of an outsider it certainly gives the place a certain Balcanic feel.

  41. Re:Romania ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By the same logic the Romans could say that you have insulted them. This is just a form of poetic justice.

  42. Re:Romania ... by hvm2hvm · · Score: 0

    You see a lot of gypsies when you enter the country because gypsies are beggars mostly. They live in train stations, bus stations, markets, etc. because that's where they can find large numbers of people to beg/steal from.

    --
    ics
  43. Weekly World News by Internal+Modem · · Score: 1

    This seems to be the Euro version of Weekly World News, considering the reporting quality (or lack of) and other dubious stories: How long until someone posts this fake story from the site to Slashdot?

  44. I Can See Your Personal Data by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    Through my 27" Liquid Crystal Monitor.

    You don't really need Google for this though. Plenty of suckers out there are quite happy to believe a cold reading.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  45. Re:Romania ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how come smart ass?

  46. Good Advice by Immerman · · Score: 1

    Can we require "for entertainment only" to be inscribed on a plaque over every church entrance?

    In all seriousness though, I think there may well be something to be said for good priests/psychics/astrologers/etc. I would say one of the marks of a really good practitioner, of the sort that can get repeat customers for years or decades on end, is the ability to consistently give good advice. That's a rare skill that modern society doesn't really give recognition to. One could even argue that the ability to "sex up" the advice with magical trappings is almost necessary to give it the weight to be followed - otherwise it's just some person giving you advice, and we all know so many people that give give bad or just random advice that it can be hard to actually listen to the good kind.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    1. Re:Good Advice by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Again, there is nothing here I disagree with, but at the same time, I think there is a legitimate case to be made for protecting the unwary or unsuspecting from charlatans.

      Not all self-proclaimed "psychics" are benevolent, for example. Many of them have been exposed as scam artists who prey on the gullible. Of course, evangelists have been known to do the same... and astrologers too.

      That is why I think a warning is appropriate: if you are warned that there is no scientific basis for claims of truth or efficacy, then you are (and should be) free to go ahead and do what you want. Some people will do it for fun; others will think the warnings are just hogwash by "unbelievers". There's nothing you can do about the latter anyway.

  47. Corruption? by Immerman · · Score: 1

    Doesn't corruption require the wielding of official power for personal gain? My understanding is that, as a rule at least, Gypsies prefer to live on the fringes of society, which would make corruption rather difficult. Okay, it could exist within their internal power structures (and I'd be surprised if is didn't, why should they be the only ones without it?), but that wouldn't seem like something that would count against them in the eyes of outsiders.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    1. Re:Corruption? by pandronic · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying that corruption is something specific to the gypsies. In fact the prosecutor in the article was corrupt and he was austrian (?). The problem is that for them it's just something so usual for them in their interactions with other societies (whether it works or not).

      The gypsy train of thought is something like this: OK, so I've got to solve a problem: Can I intimidate the dude? I'll just threaten him and his family with my hundreds of relatives. Can I blackmail him somehow? Can I steal something from him? Maybe then I can take the most pitiful posture and humiliate myself, so I can beg it out of him? Can I bribe him? If not I can lie to whoever is in charge, while caring two small children and screaming like I'm possessed. Did neither of this work? And I have to work to solve this problem? Aww, fuck it, I'll just find something else ... maybe I'll go to France or Italy.

      BTW, I'm not exaggerating ... we have to put up with this shit every day.

  48. Re:Romania ... by flyneye · · Score: 1
    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  49. Rectangular Bigotry? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    The pair used information collected from internet search and social networks to gain the trust of their customers, claiming that they could see their personal data through their crystal ball.

    Why is it illegal to search clients' public websites via a spherical monitor? I don't get it.

  50. And they would've got away with it too... by Sir+Realist · · Score: 1

    ...if it weren't for those pesky kids in the stoner van.

    "their most bizarre case involved a scuba diver dressed as a monster."

    1. Re:And they would've got away with it too... by chrisinspace · · Score: 1

      Like, zoinks! I was thinking the same thing.

    2. Re:And they would've got away with it too... by Sir+Realist · · Score: 1

      Heh; someone else got there first though - I didn't see his comment til after I'd posted...

  51. Re:Romania ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot the essential: the way of addressing this overly prolific minority was imposed by the European Union to ensure that they don't get offended by being called their true name (and make sure that the association Romanian/Gypsy gets statutory if not intentional). Never mind though, I'm just a racist prick that will persist on calling them as they should.

  52. Scooby Doo Episode Polt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "But they didn't stop at merely spying on their victims: their most bizarre case involved a scuba diver dressed as a monster.""

    I guess this plot was revealed by "those meddling kids".

  53. Re:Scooby Doo Episode Plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plot I mean.

  54. Re:Romania ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Borat is a Gypsy Hunter, hire him!

  55. Of course it is! by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

    It's almost therapeutic to completely suspend your disbelief every once in a while and get in touch with the spiritual side (I think that there is a certain mental state that every human - no matter how skeptic, etc. - can achieve if they want to... and it's pretty pleasant, really).

    Of course it's pleasant. Why do you think the majority of people are religious? Being an atheist is HARD because you can't abdicate responsibility to the man in the sky/tarot cards/etc. Not saying that you believe, but now you see how seductive it can be...

    Opiate of the masses, indeed.

    As long as you keep it at that and don't ever start to think that you could actually make important decisions based on all that, it's pretty much the most harmless source of enjoyment that there is.

    Casinos are always packed to the gills with people. Do you *really* think they all see it as nothing more than entertainment and fully expect to lose all the money they put on the table?

    So yes, if you have the right mindset, it's totally harmless. The issue is that the majority of humanity does NOT have the right mindset.

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
  56. Re:Romania ... by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

    Worse than that, everyone thinks all gypsies are Romanian! Poor gypsies... :)

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
  57. Let me get this straight... by ForgedArtificer · · Score: 1

    So it's all right to flat out pretend that you can see the future, but if you do research first, it's fraud?

    --
    The right to offend is central to the right to free speech.
  58. Re:Romania ... by hvm2hvm · · Score: 1

    Touche...

    --
    ics
  59. Re:Romania ... by pandronic · · Score: 1

    Except that, a couple of millenia ago, when the Roman empire invaded these places and wiped the floor with the local Thracians, a lot of Romans settled here - so many in fact, that the old Thracian language was lost forever save for a few words. People in these parts were Romans speaking latin.

    Having said that, I personally think the country's name is silly, but they needed a name for the two united Romanian countries in the mid 19th century (Moldavia and Valahia). I think it was also a statement against the Ottoman and the Russian empires. Something like - even if you surround and oppress us, fuck you, we are not like you, we'll never be and in fact we're better than you because we were Romans once.