Slashdot Mirror


New York City Pushes Plan To Prevent Cyberattacks On Elevators, Boilers

coondoggie writes "Imagine what would happen if an attacker broke into the network for the industrial control systems for New York City's elevators and boiler systems and decided to disrupt them, imperiling the lives of hundreds of thousands of residents relying on them. Think it could never happen? Think again. 'You could increase the speed of how elevators go up or down,' says Steve Ramirez, business analyst, analysis and communications in the Office of the CIO of the New York City Housing Authority, which provides public housing for low- to moderate-income families in the five boroughs of the city. And if attackers ever successfully penetrated the network-based industrial control systems for the boilers, they could raise the heat levels for municipal boilers, causing them to explode." Maybe Bruce Schneier could run a new movie-scenario contest about ways this could play out.

171 comments

  1. DUMB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These systems shouldn't be network accessible anyway.
    !!!

    1. Re:DUMB by spazdor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And even if they are, why on earth would they have software-configurable speeds or pressures that can range outside of safe parameters? The safety limits should be hard-coded.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    2. Re:DUMB by crashumbc · · Score: 5, Informative

      They aren't the writer is a idiot. Boiler's have MULTIPLE safeties that will just them down locally.

      Not to mention mechanically pressure release devices, at worst they would vent boiler water onto the boiler room floor...

    3. Re:DUMB by solidraven · · Score: 2

      Hard-coded isn't enough. Critical safety operations should NEVER be given to software. Remember what happened with the Therac-25 machines?

    4. Re:DUMB by tqk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They aren't the writer is a idiot. Boiler's have MULTIPLE safeties that will just [shut] them down locally.

      Not to mention [mechanical] pressure release devices; at worst they would vent boiler water onto the boiler room floor...

      We hope. Far too many geeks just assume what's drop dead obvious to them is drop dead obvious to users/regular mortals. You guys should know by now that's not true.

      Then, add in moronic management. !@#$ generally wants to happen if it can. See Murphy's Law.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    5. Re:DUMB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better still boilers should come with manual pop-off valves when pressure hits a threshold, the valve opens up and the steam escapes. No explosion.
      Sounds like someone is trying to be alarmist so more freedoms can be taken away - to protect the children of course.

    6. Re:DUMB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If what he is saying is true, then these things are time bombs waiting for a software fault. If you can consider it with malice then it is just as likely through incompetence.

    7. Re:DUMB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      author is an idiot.
      He would be better off worrying about the radium in his pocket watch.
      or all that Radon filling up his basement.

    8. Re:DUMB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most boilers are programmed using PLCs. There is no real "hard-coding", if you can get remote access you can change pretty much anything you want. The best security method would be isolated networks and leave the PLC key switch in "RUN" mode and not "remote" mode so edits cannot be made unless you have physical access. However, its really inconvenient for maintenance to have to physically flip a switch every time you need to look at the boiler program, so 99% of people leave the switch in remote mode.

    9. Re:DUMB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I actually worked in the industry for years, it's law they have to have safeties, both mechanical and electrical... Same way you can't buy a hot water heater with out a release...

    10. Re:DUMB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why there are building codes, building inspectors, plan reviews, professional plumbers and the requirement for a professional engineer to sign off the plans. See, in the real world, where we build real things, we have these systems. In your programming world, you make shit up to comply with made up requirements, and get shitty software as a result.

    11. Re:DUMB by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I hope users/regular mortals are not installing boilers instead of professionals.

    12. Re:DUMB by g0tai · · Score: 1

      They may be network accessible for monitoring or remote fault reporting purposes - Building Management Systems (commonly known as BEMS) can link to all kinds of things (Heating/cooling/etc, lighting, door security)

    13. Re:DUMB by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Users find ways to get around safety features too. Such as a machine requiring two users to push two buttons that are far apart in order to turn on the machine, but then it turns out someone figures out that they can just put a weight on one of the buttons and operate it with only one person.

      Software can also be used to add safety. Same machine as above may be asking several times during operation "ask the patient's name" and so forth, all so that info can be cross referenced and operation shut down if things don't seem right (ie manually entered ID doesn't match the ID on the badge).

    14. Re:DUMB by RalphTheWonderLlama · · Score: 2

      Yeah! Go the Battlestar Galactica route and un-network all of this stuff!

      --
      simple, fast homepage with your links: http://www.ngumbi.com/
    15. Re:DUMB by spazdor · · Score: 1

      We hope. Far too many geeks just assume what's drop dead obvious to them is drop dead obvious to users/regular mortals^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hjourneyman boilermakers and elevator engineers.

      FTFY. The general public may be assumed to be idiots, but the aforementioned specialists should not.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    16. Re:DUMB by tqk · · Score: 2

      In your programming world, you make shit up to comply with made up requirements, and get shitty software as a result.

      Holmes Inspection is a TV series premised on the fact that home buyers have hired a professional to vet their intended buy, and have been screwed regardless. I've never been a great fan of so-called vetted professionals[*]. "MCSE" == "Must Call Somebody Else" or "Minesweeper Consultant and Solitaire Expert". :-P

      And no, in my world, I study the problem to death then design a solution that's tested to death to make the problem go away forever.

      [*] There are Sun Certified engineers out there who can't list a directory's contents. I can go on and on with other examples of this phenomenon (not necessarily involving Sun) until I put you to sleep, honest.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    17. Re:DUMB by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Yeah! Go the Battlestar Galactica route and un-network all of this stuff!

      Can't you just cross the tachyon beams?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    18. Re:DUMB by tqk · · Score: 1

      I actually worked in the industry for years, it's law they have to have safeties, both mechanical and electrical ...

      You've more faith in the law than I. In my experience, people do what little they hope they can get away with, and the law's only purpose is to clean up the mess that they didn't get away with once their error manifests itself. I wish that were not so. I hate learning about innocents who've been victimized.

      I love working with the Mike Holmes types who take their obligations seriously, but I've not met many recently who do.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    19. Re:DUMB by tqk · · Score: 1

      FTFY. The general public may be assumed to be idiots, but the aforementioned specialists should not.

      I hope you're right (about the latter). I've met far too many people in IT who barely made the grade as far as I was concerned. Hopefully, those trades do better on that score.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    20. Re:DUMB by devitto · · Score: 1

      I think the point is that the hard-coded software can be swapped with the software from the building with a basement, or more floors aka 'the Wonka Factory effect' :-)

    21. Re:DUMB by GPierce · · Score: 3, Funny

      I remember the description of the ideal factory security system. It consisted of a computer console, a dog and one human being.

      The reason for computer console was to run the factory.
      The reason for the human being was to feed the dog.
      The reason for the dog was to keep the human being away from the computer console.

      --

      When you are dancing with wolves, never limp
    22. Re:DUMB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      okay, so you've got two sets of examples: TV "reality show" that's clearly cherrypicking the worst (and home inspectors don't have any certification requirements outside the state of California, and I don't think they do there), and evidence supporting my example that IT types are hardly a good example of trained professionals. Hopefully you're one of the outliers. All of the ones I've found had something in common -- no CS degree.

    23. Re:DUMB by tqk · · Score: 1

      All of the ones I've found had something in common -- no CS degree.

      Huh. Some of the best I've worked with were self trained, some even high school dropouts. A degree can mean you can suffer regimentation and drudgery, and learn to take tests. Woohoo.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    24. Re:DUMB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hot water heater

      Why would you want to heat water that's already hot?

    25. Re:DUMB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How they will connect all these buildings all over the city then? That is the purpose of the ICS. But I admit it is scary and should've been implemented in private lines networks and not through the internet. I wonder what other ICSs are out there connecting who knows what? Is this supposed to be public domain information (the existence and locations of all these ICSs?) Because if it is easy to find this info, then we are more in danger and more vulnerable as a nation as I originally thought. I knew that our power grid is somewhat exposed and that we need to keep a closed eye on it, but now this? These internet-based ICSs sound like a bad business idea, especially in systems like these in NY. Exposing so many lives like that in lieu of progress (automation) makes no sense. If FaceBook with its billion of dollars security machine, and the military with its top secret machinery were hacked by a loners, imaging what can an evil nation inclined to do damage to us could do. There always be dedicated nut hackers and capable thrill seeking tech people trying to cause havoc. God forbid these systems become a target.

    26. Re:DUMB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flood every public housing in the city? Or cause pressure alarms to trigger and shut down every boiler in the middle of a very cold winter night? Are those two scenarios sounds idiotic to you?

    27. Re:DUMB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but deliberately disabling off a safety is never a good idea, and doing so (in software) may be possible.

      And it's no small matter. Superheated steam can be roughly as explosive as TNT.

    28. Re:DUMB by EngineerAlex · · Score: 1

      Correct, boilers have multiple safety devices. Alarms, shutdowns, and safety relief valves will trigger in succession to prevent damage to personal, equipment and the facilities. I work with marine boilers - aboard commercial cargo ships - and while some of the monitoring systems are networked, all the actual control is done by an isolated PLC locally. It is very hard to make them explode. Perhaps the boilers in NYC are different - but I strongly doubt it. -A

    29. Re:DUMB by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      And even if they are, why on earth would they have software-configurable speeds or pressures that can range outside of safe parameters? The safety limits should be hard-coded.

      In the case of boilers, they're not coded at all. There's a physical pressure relief valve. Jesus Christ! Programmers think hardware designers rely on CODE to make things safe???

    30. Re:DUMB by solidraven · · Score: 1

      Sure it can be used as a first line of defence. But it should never be the only. And it should never have complete control. But hardware safety features should ALWAYS be implemented cause the software can (and will) fail at some point. Additionally it's important to design the hardware so that a failure of the safety system itself also disables the machine.

    31. Re:DUMB by BlueStrat · · Score: 2

      FTFY. The general public may be assumed to be idiots, but the aforementioned specialists should not.

      I hope you're right (about the latter). I've met far too many people in IT who barely made the grade as far as I was concerned. Hopefully, those trades do better on that score.

      Don't worry too much. There are always outliers in any field, but things like elevator experts, journeymen boiler makers, master electricians, pipe-fitters, etc are tightly regulated and enjoy a very high degree of general professionalism and competence, particularly regarding safety.

      I've been employed in a couple of these trades as well, and between the redundant safeties built into everything, the facility safety inspections, the strict testing, licensing, and the very serious amount of training and then years of apprenticeship before you're allowed to do much of anything that's not triple-checked behind you, not to mention that trades companies have an *extremely* dim view of being put on the hook for perhaps many lives and millions and millions in legal liability, there are relatively extremely few ways for things to go bad on-site. In fact, very few things ever do, relatively speaking.

      But, because all this training, testing, licensing, apprenticeships, etc make such highly-skilled workers very expensive, I'd bet labor cost is one of, if not the main, driving force behind why things that really shouldn't be networked to the internet are being pushed there by the "bottom-line" types.

      Why hire expensive tradesmen for every installation when you can have one set of guys run multiple sites remotely? Of course, most with experience in these trades can give you a list of reasons as long as your arm, but PHBs rarely listen to the "grunts" in the field. What self-respecting, Brook-Bros-suit-wearing upper-management-type is going to listen to some peons that have permanent grease-stains under their fingernails? They don't even have an MBA!!

      The designed-in fail-safes in equipment and systems will make up for a lot, but there still may be unforeseen ways to cause a disaster with things like boilers and elevators involved. Especially when many such boiler and elevator systems were designed back before any real automation, never mind control over the internet, was even a dream. Hard for an elevator system or boiler system designed in the '40s, '50s, or '60s to build in safeguards against a hostile off-site controller.

      So, many MBA/management types are tempted into thinking that even though putting all that infrastructure/mechanical control on the 'net might not be the safest idea, it sure saves money in skilled labor costs, though!

      Besides, nobody's made it a crime yet, right?

      I guess we'll have to wait for a disaster (or six) to happen first for that.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    32. Re:DUMB by gmack · · Score: 1

      Don't know about that.. I've known some pretty useless IT people who had CS degrees.

    33. Re:DUMB by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

      I hope users/regular mortals are not installing boilers instead of professionals.

      Remember how hard it was last time to find talented, compenent help? Double or treble that difficulty.

    34. Re:DUMB by arisvega · · Score: 1

      they could raise the heat levels for municipal boilers, causing them to explode.

      Yes, and splash toxic oxygen dihydride all around.

      --
      The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
    35. Re:DUMB by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      You can think of "hot water" as the product. You want a heater that makes hot water... so it's a "hot water heater".

      I know, it sounds silly.. but you can grammatically justify it if you stretch a little. :)

    36. Re:DUMB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't the writer is a idiot. Boiler's have MULTIPLE safeties that will just them down locally.

      Not to mention mechanically pressure release devices, at worst they would vent boiler water onto the boiler room floor...

      Agreed... There are local, hardwired safeties required by code to shutdown equipment.

    37. Re:DUMB by tqk · · Score: 1

      So, many MBA/management types are tempted into thinking that even though putting all that infrastructure/mechanical control on the 'net might not be the safest idea, it sure saves money in skilled labor costs, though!

      You've got to wonder, why isn't that facet taught to those MBA types? Liability can be a hell of a lot more expensive than mere labour. Are the MBAs to blame, or don't insurance companies know what they're doing?

      I'm thinking of that building in Hong Kong (?) where some bright boy decided to move some honking big machinery from where it was to the roof, leading to the collapse of the building. That kind of comedy of errors just astounds me. First, why attempt it in the first place; is there no alternative, or are you just being greedy? Second, has an architect and structural engineer signed off on this? Has anyone checked those guys' credentials and work history? And on, and on. This sort of process should have been sorted out a long time ago, and those MBAs ought to be taught about this stuff before they get their parchments.

      Meanwhile, there are people in my own city (Calgary, AB) who're building skyscrapers whose plate glass windows can't stay attached, leading to glass shards raining down on pedestrians, shutting down the centre of the city for two days. I think causing that sort of cock-up should be expensive, yet here we are in the 21st Century and still it happens.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    38. Re:DUMB by RalphTheWonderLlama · · Score: 1

      That's why it's bigger in the past.

      --
      simple, fast homepage with your links: http://www.ngumbi.com/
    39. Re:DUMB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this even serious? Elevators _dont fall. If they ever did, no one would ever trust or ride them and buildings would never have been built higher than 10 stories.
      http://express.howstuffworks.com/runaway-elevator.htm

      And buildings in NYC networked together?? Are you joking? Building owners working together for something that complicated? They aren't just overestimating terrorist capabilities, but the fact that the target doesn't even exist.

      The worst that could happen would be that they shut some building's elevator, or heat, or AC down... which happens all the time anyway, so who would know if it was on purpose? I mean, if an apartment building's boiler blows in the winter, how long does it take the landlord to fix it?? Forever! If a terrorist made an announcement that they were responsible for something like that, it would be great because the place would be swarming with people looking into everything and it would be fixed that day!

    40. Re:DUMB by tqk · · Score: 1

      hot water heater

      Why would you want to heat water that's already hot?

      Would you prefer a cold water heater? Isn't that a bit redundant? What other kind of water needs to be heated to make it hot water?

      Semantics. Gotta love 'em.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    41. Re:DUMB by sjames · · Score: 1

      I do appreciate the Mythbusters reruns reminding me to periodically work the relief valve on the water heater so it doesn't stick. :-) I wonder how frequently the relief valves are worked in NY?

      The more likely scenario though would be to make buildings uninhabitably hot or cold.

  2. Offline? by Nkwe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe these systems should be on isolated networks.

    1. Re:Offline? by cpu6502 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They probably are. This guy is just trying to sell fear for personal gain (money or power). Ben Franklin was right when he said the greatest danger are those in power who are filled with avarice or ambition.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    2. Re:Offline? by c0lo · · Score: 1

      They probably are. This guy is just trying to sell fear for personal gain (money or power). Ben Franklin was right when he said the greatest danger are those in power who are filled with avarice or ambition.

      (pro)active stupidity in power is even worse.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    3. Re:Offline? by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      Democrat Congressman to Pentagon general: "I am concerned that if we put too many tanks on the island might..... tip over." - Yep. Stupidity in a leader is dangerous.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    4. Re:Offline? by c0lo · · Score: 1

      Democrat Congressman to Pentagon general: "I am concerned that if we put too many tanks on the island might..... tip over." - Yep. Stupidity in a leader is dangerous.

      (anecdotes aside... active stupidity is dangerous because makes the actions unpredictable. Avarice and ambitions show at least a pattern).

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    5. Re:Offline? by RalphTheWonderLlama · · Score: 1

      Lol i saw the video. That's pretty bad but they later said the guy was off his meds at the time. I forgot what he had.

      --
      simple, fast homepage with your links: http://www.ngumbi.com/
    6. Re:Offline? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      low IQ. incurable and untreatable.

    7. Re:Offline? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for clarifying that he's a Democrat. I would usually assume that a question that stupid would come from a Republican. Repubs don't have a monopoly on ignorance (and fear-mongering, bigotry, etc.), but it's pretty close.

  3. Movie scenario by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Maybe they could run a movie scenario about how scare-mongering about trivial threats diverts attention and resources from real problems.

    1. Re:Movie scenario by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's been done. The movie was called Wag the Dog.

    2. Re:Movie scenario by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they can make one without a stupid title, so that I might actually be interested in watching it.

    3. Re:Movie scenario by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they could run a movie scenario about how scare-mongering about trivial threats diverts attention and resources from real problems.

      It's been done. The movie was called Wag the Dog.

      Perhaps they can make one without a stupid title, so that I might actually be interested in watching it.

      Inform myself? No time for that, Dancing with the Stars is on!

      The scream you just heard was America dying.

    4. Re:Movie scenario by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I know right, Se7en, Goodfellas, Dog Day Afternoon, and The Princess Bride are all so horrible. Good thing you gave them all a miss.

    5. Re:Movie scenario by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe they could run a movie scenario about how scare-mongering about trivial threats diverts attention and resources from real problems.

      It's been done. The movie was called Wag the Dog.

      Perhaps they can make one without a stupid title, so that I might actually be interested in watching it.

      Inform myself? No time for that, Dancing with the Stars is on!

      The scream you just heard was America dying.

      Quite the opposite. It was tomorrow's America rising from the mutation vats at McDonald's.

    6. Re:Movie scenario by tqk · · Score: 1

      ... The Princess Bride are all so horrible.

      Bite your tongue! "I am Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die!"

      Classic.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    7. Re:Movie scenario by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      There was also a Futurama episode. The robot eldar created a fear of humans in order to prevent the robot public from realising the true problem: incompetent robot eldar.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  4. Does this guy even know anything about this? by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Boilers have release valves for a reason. Even if you could turn the heat all the way up the safety release valves would let go. You would have to weld those shut to explode a boiler. If the "evil-doers" are welding those shut you have other problems

    1. Re:Does this guy even know anything about this? by couchslug · · Score: 0

      "If the "evil-doers" are welding those shut you have other problems"

      No shit. As long as "evil-doers" prefer a keyboard to a pipe wrench it's easier to defend against them.

      A baddie with mechanical experience and perfectly legal hand tools could go walkabout and cause massive (literally) destruction.

      I'll not put thoughts into idle heads, but "wrecking" (the very old Soviet term for it) could make quite a mess.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:Does this guy even know anything about this? by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

      You beat me to the punch. Likewise, many of these other systems will have hardwired safety systems that limit the danger they present.

      I still think this equipment should be on isolated networks, but it's harder for me to get overly excited about ICS vulnerabilities.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    3. Re:Does this guy even know anything about this? by sunderland56 · · Score: 2

      Elevators also have speed controls, and cannot go faster than a certain designed-in speed because of mechanical reasons, not CPU controlled ones.

      Besides, most elevators (and most boilers) in NYC predate the internet. On the elevators that are more modern, the average New Yorker would greatly appreciate it if you could speed them up somehow.....

    4. Re:Does this guy even know anything about this? by cptdondo · · Score: 1

      I'm a bit baffled by this also. If all of the City's boilers and elevators are on the same network, and someone could successfully hack into it, they could possibly do some minor amount of damage. But really.... Elevators only hold a few people. And how many buildings actually have boilers? Don't most modern buildings use heat pumps? I don't know of any building that still uses steam, and those that do would be unlikely to have sophisticated networked controls.

      You'd get much more bang for the buck by bombing Grand Central at rush hour... And much simpler.

      Seems like someone has been watching too many 80s B movies.

    5. Re:Does this guy even know anything about this? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Boilers have release valves for a reason. Even if you could turn the heat all the way up the safety release valves would let go. You would have to weld those shut to explode a boiler. If the "evil-doers" are welding those shut you have other problems

      Exactly what I was thinking.

      Same thing with the elevators. Other than the dynamic braking that goes on, elevators pretty much operate at full-tilt anyway, and I am quite sure that there is a hard software/hardware limiter that sets an upper limit on the ascent/descent speed, as well as the maximum accel/decel rate.

      Any elevator engineers/techs care to weigh in on this?

    6. Re:Does this guy even know anything about this? by trout007 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. The speed of the elevator will be limited to the motor power. Now you could do something dangerous like waiting until 5 seconds after the door opens and then drop the elevator 10 feet. I don't know about the particular designs to know if there is a mechanical interrupt when the doors are open.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    7. Re:Does this guy even know anything about this? by DaMattster · · Score: 1

      Boilers have release valves for a reason. Even if you could turn the heat all the way up the safety release valves would let go. You would have to weld those shut to explode a boiler. If the "evil-doers" are welding those shut you have other problems

      Also, elevators have safety systems that deploy brakes automatically when an accelerometer detects a sudden acceleration well oustide of normal operating parameters.

    8. Re:Does this guy even know anything about this? by cyberchondriac · · Score: 4, Funny

      Elevators also have speed controls, and cannot go faster than a certain designed-in speed because of mechanical reasons, not CPU controlled ones.

      Aw crap, there goes my idea for a poor man's space elevator.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    9. Re:Does this guy even know anything about this? by spikestabber · · Score: 2

      This "Accelerometer" is mechanical. If the elevator completely lost power and the hoist motor brakes for some reason failed to engage (rare as they're supposed to fail closed), the emergency brakes on the car itself would trigger.

    10. Re:Does this guy even know anything about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I would be wondering about is not so much the elevator speed settings (while those may need to be recalibrated or what not - i've heard some require 7th degree derivative equations to ensure a smooth ride so probably NOT a simple thing to adjust) but operation.

      Doors not opening, cars stopping between floors, cars locked at a static position in the shaft (top of the shaft, bottom of the shaft, etc), changing the wait times between floors, and so on. Especially if an attacker can alter the administrative codes.

      This, of course, is why we have stairs, but those only work for people outside of elevators.

    11. Re:Does this guy even know anything about this? by crashumbc · · Score: 2

      . And how many buildings actually have boilers? Don't most modern buildings use heat pumps? I don't know of any building that still uses steam, and those that do would be unlikely to have sophisticated networked controls.

      NO buildings of any size uses heat pumps, they are very inefficient...

      Pretty much every large building has a boiler or more likely several.

      as far as steam I'm not sure how many systems new systems are being installed but any older building that's been keep up has had its control systems modernized. Example the Empire State Building's system is completely computer controlled (its steam)

    12. Re:Does this guy even know anything about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. I worked in a skyscraper in Chicago for about a decade. During that time, one or another elevator would break down approximately annually, and the result every single time was that people were stuck between floors for a few minutes, even the time that flooding made the entire building lose power. Elevator safety systems are highly reliable; even if you could mess with it via software, you would only inconvenience a few people on their way to a meeting.

    13. Re:Does this guy even know anything about this? by tqk · · Score: 1

      Seems like someone has been watching too many 80s B movies.

      Nah. Al Quaida's just lost so many of their leaders via drone strikes, they're outsourcing strategy and planning to the net. Smiple. [sic] Funny they'd come here. :-?

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    14. Re:Does this guy even know anything about this? by RalphTheWonderLlama · · Score: 1

      Universities often still use steam

      --
      simple, fast homepage with your links: http://www.ngumbi.com/
    15. Re:Does this guy even know anything about this? by RalphTheWonderLlama · · Score: 1

      Your smiley face question mark just blew my mind.

      --
      simple, fast homepage with your links: http://www.ngumbi.com/
    16. Re:Does this guy even know anything about this? by tqk · · Score: 1

      Your smiley face question mark just blew my mind.

      You don't get out much? [Something profound goes here, but escapes me ATM ...]

      Tooduls. Have fun, and try not to hurt anybody.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    17. Re:Does this guy even know anything about this? by russotto · · Score: 1

      Exactly. The speed of the elevator will be limited to the motor power. Now you could do something dangerous like waiting until 5 seconds after the door opens and then drop the elevator 10 feet. I don't know about the particular designs to know if there is a mechanical interrupt when the doors are open.

      There is. Doesn't help when somebody bypasses it, but at least that has to be done on site.

    18. Re:Does this guy even know anything about this? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      accelerometer? haha, that's the funniest thing I've heard Elisha Otis' invention called. it's a centrifugal brake, it has spinning weights on springs, and there is one at each corner on the rails. hint: they don't have ethernet jacks

    19. Re:Does this guy even know anything about this? by ehud42 · · Score: 1

      In New York where temperatures can go below freezing, a more devastating attack might be bust them enough to shut them down due to damage. Damage enough and the repair guys won't have enough parts or time to repair them all before the water starts freezing and causing even more problems. If the goal of terrorism is to upset the people, shutting the heat off on a bunch of lower income folks during a cold snap might trigger the desired instability.

      --
      I'm in my right mind and I have the answer to everything!
    20. Re:Does this guy even know anything about this? by mattr · · Score: 1

      What about systems with more than one elevator per shaft.. I know a couple high rises like that and they are probably software controlled through and through. Or I wonder is there a hardware mechanism that could handle idiotproofing it?

    21. Re:Does this guy even know anything about this? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      And the motor power will be enough to do the job it's designed to do, perhaps with a little bit to spare.

      Some years back I blocked the elevator doors with my foot to hold it for a colleague I'd seen arriving. I didn't go for the button because I'd almost certainly hit the wrong one.

      Someone asked if I was worried that I might get my foot crushed. I said that even if the sensor failed, the motor wouldn't be powerful enough. And why would it be? It's unnecessary cost putting a 1200 hp motor to close a goddam door.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  5. Isn't that a huge flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't it a huge flaw that a boiler could be configured in any way shape or form to get so hot that they explode? We have multiple redundant systems on water heaters to ensure that they are operating in a safe temperature range.

    1. Re:Isn't that a huge flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have multiple redundant systems on water heaters to ensure that they are operating in a safe temperature range

      Tell me about it. I've had 3 service calls on the hot water heater in the past year. The ECO (Emergency Cut-Off) was suspected of being faulty, replaced, and that didn't fix it. They replaced almost the whole control assembly. No dice. As a last ditch before replacing the whole thing they, adjusted something topside. I don't know what. The call went long, I had to fix dinner and couldn't watch. My fingers are crossed. If that last fix doesn't work they have to replace the heater, and to make matters worse codes have changed. They are required to run new drain pipes outside the foundation to avoid flooding under the foundation. The one saving grace is that it's the owner's problem; but it's still no fun having the hot water go out.

  6. hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "business analyst, analysis and communications in the Office of the CIO of the New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA)"

    So a housing authority needs a full office for Information systems and in that office it needs a business analyst (because that is part of information systems)?

    Sound like a bureaucrat that needs to justify the job his dad got him.

    1. Re:hmmm by Sarten-X · · Score: 0

      A housing authority housing (probably... too lazy to look up numbers) thousands of families, and probably tracking financial information on them all, across several hundred separate locations? No, they don't need an IS department at all. They can use Excel, right?

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    2. Re:hmmm by c0lo · · Score: 1

      A housing authority housing (probably... too lazy to look up numbers) thousands of families, and probably tracking financial information on them all, across several hundred separate locations? No, they don't need an IS department at all. They can use Excel, right?

      Do they need an IS service dept that resorts in connecting these utilities to the net? What for?

      These types of attack have never happened, but in the age of ever-mounting cyber exploits, NYCHA, which is responsible for over a thousand buildings in the city, wants to take every precaution, though it could get expensive

      . Ah, I see... that explains (works even better if you are not on a consulting position, but a permanent hire).

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    3. Re:hmmm by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      Do they need an IS service dept that resorts in connecting these utilities to the net? What for?

      With summer coming up, who's going to go drive to all the properties and run through the process to turn it down, since they won't need as much heating? And when winter comes, who's going to turn it up again, and every day, check that they're all in working order?

      Would that checking be less expensive than securing a network connection? I doubt it.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  7. Read only settings by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 0

    That, and perhaps someone can explain what, if any, need there is for an elevator's speed to change after it has been calibrated?

    --
    Palm trees and 8
    1. Re:Read only settings by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Funny

      How else would the turbo button work?

    2. Re:Read only settings by i_ate_god · · Score: 1

      because the speed will probably have to be calibrated again after a period of time.

      --
      I'm god, but it's a bit of a drag really...
    3. Re:Read only settings by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      Ok, so why do you need to do that over a network?

      I mean, if the elevator speed is inaccurate, then that means the sensors in the elevator that determine it's speed are inaccurate, so you have to bring new sensors on site anyway, so you can calibrate it onsite.

    4. Re:Read only settings by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      Is that common though? It seems to me that once the speed of a elevator is calibrated, it should not need to change -- the calibration should be for the building itself, which should not frequently change. Sensors may malfunction and necessitate a recalibration, but if that still does not explain why the settings would need to be changed by the control system's software.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    5. Re:Read only settings by tqk · · Score: 0

      That, and perhaps someone can explain what, if any, need there is for an elevator's speed to change after it has been calibrated?

      Stress testing the system? On a holiday when no civilians are around, speed it up and see if anything breaks. If not, then running at civilian speed should be safe.

      Don't you people feed your programs bad data to find out what happens when they encounter it?!?

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    6. Re:Read only settings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Perhaps compliance with new regulations? A service company could theoretically roll an update out accross a country or state without having to visit each elevator.

    7. Re:Read only settings by Bigby · · Score: 1

      Emergency use? Maybe paramedics...

    8. Re:Read only settings by denobug · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Perhaps compliance with new regulations? A service company could theoretically roll an update out accross a country or state without having to visit each elevator.

      No you do that ON-SITE. This is not web services or video games. You have someone there locally to confirm it is working in real life when making parameter changes like this.

    9. Re:Read only settings by umghhh · · Score: 1

      Modern lifts change speed in a smooth way to (among other benefits) avoid feeling of discomfort by passengers. It would surprise me if these parameters were centrally controlled but then maybe not. The fact remains however that modern lifts do have more than one fixed speed.

    10. Re:Read only settings by jackbird · · Score: 1

      Every big-city building (residential AND commercial) I've ever spent a lot of time in has had elevator techs onsite at least monthly. In one building I lived in, the elevator company had their own office space off the lobby.

  8. Movies eh? by decipher_saint · · Score: 2

    In a World where up isn't always the direction you're headed and going down will kill you, A hero will rise...

    TERRORVATOR

    *break*

    Ted Buttson wasn't exactly the best elevator repairman "Y'know normally the buttons don't do this" (empty elevator drops from sight, crashes). In fact you could say he was the worst elevator repairman "Why do they build these things with all these extra bolts?" (elevator doors fall in), but sometimes it doesn't matter who you are if you're on the right floor at the right time "H-hey! I think these guys wanna do something BAD to this elevator!". Coming this summer from the same studio that brought you predictable comedy before comes "TED: Going Down" (close up shot of actor making faces with sexy music playing)

    [NOT YET RATED]

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
    1. Re:Movies eh? by Sunshinerat · · Score: 1

      This has been done before... http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087622/

      --
      Load New Commander (Y/N)?
    2. Re:Movies eh? by decipher_saint · · Score: 2

      Ah, but this would be the American version, with dames, car chases, terrorists, plenty of one-liners and explosions!

      IN (unconvincing) 3D!!

      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
    3. Re:Movies eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw this trailer in my head. It is indistinguishable from any other trailer. What you need is a hot girl for Ted to ogle as he walks into an elevator shaft. That will put it over the top!

  9. Derp, meet Herp by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Imagine what would happen if an attacker broke into the network for the industrial control systems for New York City's elevators and boiler systems."

    Some people would have to take the stairs and others would take cold showers. A truly terrifying prospect. Elevators and hot water are conveniences; People don't die from the lack of them.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Derp, meet Herp by DaMattster · · Score: 1

      Sounds like attempts to whip up a fear storm and get more funds allocated towards anti-terrorism. I get sick of the fear storms!

    2. Re:Derp, meet Herp by Sunshinerat · · Score: 1

      And the best part is that all the elevators and boilers will be reconfigured back to normal the next day and the world keeps on spinning like nothing happened.

      --
      Load New Commander (Y/N)?
    3. Re:Derp, meet Herp by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you don't know what a boiler is. Think of downing the boilers in the middle of a bad winter, timed to coincide with a snow storm to hamper emergency response. It's not just hot water, but also heat. If 100 buildings with 10+ floors were suddenly without heat or elevators in the middle of a cold winter storm, don't you think that is a little more inconvenient than just cold showers?

    4. Re:Derp, meet Herp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but if you're getting public assistance housing, then you wouldn't be getting what someone else didn't paid for.

      I had to chuckle when it sounded like public assistance housing would be a terrorist target. The housing costs the country money, so destroying it, and having people get housing elsewhere, would potentially stop a drain on our economy.

    5. Re:Derp, meet Herp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think a major high rise can function effectively without stairs. People don't die, but lots of money would be lost.

    6. Re:Derp, meet Herp by Bigby · · Score: 1

      Emergency response time would increase SIGNIFICANTLY. People would die.

    7. Re:Derp, meet Herp by PPH · · Score: 2

      Think of downing the boilers in the middle of a bad winter, timed to coincide with a snow storm to hamper emergency response.

      OK, I'm thinking of it. I'm thinking of it for a week long outage.

      Welcome to PSE service territory.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    8. Re:Derp, meet Herp by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      If 100 buildings with 10+ floors were suddenly without heat or elevators in the middle of a cold winter storm, don't you think that is a little more inconvenient than just cold showers?

      I know what a boiler is, and I live in Minnesota. The lowest temperature recorded in New York during the winter is about -20. That's about the temperature where it starts to get cold enough that I'd think about keeping my pants on under the covers. Also, it takes days for a building to cool to freezing after a heating system fails; Just like a refrigerator doesn't immediately warm up to room temperature when you pull the plug. I've been in an apartment building when the boiler failed and was used as the primary heat for the building, and it was in the middle of January, during a -40 cold snap up here. You know what I did?

      I turned on the stove.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    9. Re:Derp, meet Herp by devitto · · Score: 1

      Elevators and hot water are conveniences; People don't die from the lack of them.

      Blatently, you have never tried to breathe near a collegue with an underperforming hygiene regime and/or instant movement-induced persperation. Lucky you.

    10. Re:Derp, meet Herp by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You've obviously not lived in New York. They hadn't used much insulation when building the older buildings. The apartment will cool down much much faster than you think. More like a fridge with the door open than closed.

    11. Re:Derp, meet Herp by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      You've obviously not lived in New York

      I won't deny that... but our roads are well-maintained, solid industrial development, people are generally polite, it doesn't cost you your first born to park downtown, not much politics, and nobody here is stupid enough to build or live in a poorly-insulated building despite at the same latitude. New Yorkers must be a special kind of stupid.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    12. Re:Derp, meet Herp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not just a loss of heat in the winter. Superheated steam can be almost as explosive as TNT; boiler explosions were the go-to industrial disasters of the 19th century, sometimes killing tens or hundreds of people.

      And yes, there are redundant safeties these days, but shutting off the software-based safety still isn't safe.

    13. Re:Derp, meet Herp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or stuck in place where properly insulated buildings are expensive to rent, perhaps?

    14. Re:Derp, meet Herp by LeadSongDog · · Score: 1

      Emergency response time would increase SIGNIFICANTLY. People would die.

      Consider the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_Storm_of_1998, when several cities lost power, in some areas for weeks. Thirty five people died. Most of these were due to improper use of generators, fires, and carbon monoxide poisoning. Those who had the sense to dress warmly and stay indoors didn't have much to worry about. The hard part was for infants and for livestock farms (especially dairy farms) that weren't equipped to run off-grid that long. People learned many lessons, such as the need for secured backup generators at cell sites, and that you can even get tired of bbq after a while.

      --
      Oh, I'm sorry sir, I thought you were referring to me, Mr. Wensleydale.
  10. So much hype over hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A baddie with mechanical experience and perfectly legal hand tools could go walkabout and cause massive (literally) destruction.

    But that require access. Just try to get into any big bilding without a security guard on your ass.

    This article was written by someone who watches way too much TV. YOu can't take down anything with jsut a keyboard. Anonymous has proven that. If they could have cause a problem of this magnitude, they would have in their protests but the best they can do is vandalize websites and get stolen data.

    Hackers can't do any real damage.

    1. Re:So much hype over hackers by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just try to get into any big bilding without a security guard on your ass.

      Get a boilerman's uniform. Wave your visitors pass. If the guard insists on accompanying you, look busy until he goes to pinch a loaf.

      Half the reason Kevin Mitnick was notorious was not because he was a stone cold hacker - he was a good social engineer.

    2. Re:So much hype over hackers by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      Kevin Mitnick might disagree. Replace curiosity with malice... the techniques still work.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    3. Re:So much hype over hackers by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I had my name on the guest register and a verified appointment and still couldn't get into "30 Rock" until the employee in that building came down and escorted me up. I don't think a maintenance guy unknown to security would have been able to make it in, even with proper forged documents.

    4. Re:So much hype over hackers by WankersRevenge · · Score: 2

      good point .. but my real concern ... how the hell did the expression 'pinch a loaf' get coined?

    5. Re:So much hype over hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does that counter the statement, though? Kevin Mitnick didn't cause massive damage.

    6. Re:So much hype over hackers by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Apparently you only looked at my first sentence and jumped to reply. Go back and read my whole post, please.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    7. Re:So much hype over hackers by tqk · · Score: 1

      But that [requires] access. Just try to get into any big [building] without a security guard on your ass.

      How about an airport? I've seen multiple stories attesting to the fact that passengers are scrutinized enormously, while catering staff and baggage handlers are challenged once at beginning of shift, then given free reign and left alone.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    8. Re:So much hype over hackers by tqk · · Score: 1

      s/reign/rein/

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    9. Re:So much hype over hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice try, FBI.

      this seems like a great way to launder money to companies you promised under the table. imagine up some crazy threat, and imaginary enemy, and pay a company to "build you a widget".

    10. Re:So much hype over hackers by SwedishPenguin · · Score: 1

      Probably aren't many security guards patrolling boiler rooms of residential buildings. Luckily, we generally use district heating in apartment buildings over here and that includes mine so no need to worry about that.

    11. Re:So much hype over hackers by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Once you've got the uniform and have bypassed the guard, then you can just sabotage the boiler without hacking any software.

    12. Re:So much hype over hackers by Arker · · Score: 1

      Not sure exactly *when* but the phrase is pretty obvious and transparent to anyone that's ever made bread and it seems certain it was originally coined with that in mind, with a quite narrow and specific meaning. Those who havent made bread tend to use it simply as a synonym for 'take a dump' (as the guy you were replying to seems to have done,) but when used properly it's hard to think of any other phrase to use that would be so apt.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    13. Re:So much hype over hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just try to get into any big bilding without a security guard on your ass.

      Get a boilerman's uniform. Wave your visitors pass. If the guard insists on accompanying you, look busy until he goes to pinch a loaf.

      Half the reason Kevin Mitnick was notorious was not because he was a stone cold hacker - he was a good social engineer.

      The guard, on site managers and all maintenance team leads have a schedule that lists any expected visitors. The guard gets the visitors ID, license plate number, tells the visitor to take a seat, checks the list, and calls the on site manager. The manager double checks the schedule and advises the maintenance lead man, If the visitor is not authorized they call the police and deploy the maintenance crews to protect the site while they wait for the police. No one gets in without written authorization.

      All authorized visitors must have escorts that are familiar with whatever they are working on. That's standard procedure.

    14. Re:So much hype over hackers by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "But that require access. Just try to get into any big bilding without a security guard on your ass."

      I'm a mechanic, and I dress in commercial uniform items. People act differently when you enter commercial suppliers because you "look like you belong".

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    15. Re:So much hype over hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had my name on the guest register and a verified appointment and still couldn't get into "30 Rock" until the employee in that building came down and escorted me up.

      Well, yeah, sure, if you walk in the front doors.

      Get a tool bag, some worn workman's clothes, an old butt set, maybe a hard hat, and go around to the maintenance entrance. Say your from Verizon, and can they direct you to the phone room. You'll get right in. I know. I've done it.

  11. WHAT SAY WE LET IT HAPPEN FIRST THEN DECIDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No point going all TSA when nothing has happened and nothing likely will. If you are peddling your "cyber protection plan" to NYC, well, good luck !! There are plenty of protection rackets going on, and you won't get your little pecker in the door, that's for sure !!

  12. Le Sigh by thejynxed · · Score: 1

    Why go through all of that bother?

    NYC's water supplies are completely unprotected. I think your imagination can come up with the rest.

    --
    @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
  13. Just jumping on the "Cyberwarfare" bandwagon by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 2

    Cyberwarfare means money. As most of the preceding posters have identified, most of the perceived threat is total horseshit. But because computers are full of magic smoke and fairies, muggles presume that a computer hooked up to a machine is a terrible threat. Haven't you seen the famous historical documentary, "Terminator" ???

    It's just like the TSA - because there hasn't been a compumatronically induced apocalypse, we're doing a good job, right? Hell yeah, line up another raft of Cyberwarfare Funding Bills, and we need some more staff to hotswap the drives in our pr0n^W evidence storage RAID array.

    1. Re:Just jumping on the "Cyberwarfare" bandwagon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This does sound like more dubious DHS grant-speak, although I'm sure they would never reference an out-of-date source like Terminator: this CIO has the very latest threat information from 24.

    2. Re:Just jumping on the "Cyberwarfare" bandwagon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. This isn't a war on terrorism, it's a war on the internet. It is a war on the FREE internet. People free to easily communicate and speak their mind in mass scares governments more than any threat of a boiler blowing up.

  14. Imagine no articles like this by swschrad · · Score: 1

    because they didn't let certified idiots connect industrial controls to the Wacky Wacky Webbiepoo.

    this is real simple. turn off the interconnects, and toss those boxes in the trash.

    we knew enough when modems ran at 100 baud to not connect critical systems to an outside influence.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  15. Fear mongering.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    First of all, elevators have _separate_ mechanical only devices that attach to the cars brakes with a fly wheel design that has springs that will cause the flywheel to physically lock the wheel and cause the separate wire it is attached to, to detach or "yank" on the brakes on the car and immediately stop the elevator. So, even if you could cause the motor to bring the elevator to free fall speeds via hacked electronics, the elevator will not free fall to the bottom...

    Second, all boilers and hot water tanks have industry mandated TMP (temperature and pressure) valves that prevent explosions in the case of an electrical malfunction. Have you never seen any of these bleeder valves on the tanks in your home? Do you think that massive boilers that could do serious damage are somehow magically devoid of these safety devices?

    Clearly, the only way for any terrorist to attack these systems in anything more than a denial of service fashion, would be to physically visit the device in question and damage it. The real way to prevent these attacks is detection (alarm systems), and to get the caretakers/maintenance people responsible for the systems to do regular maintenance and checks to ensure that they haven't been tampered with. ie: elevator maintenance needs to regularly inspect the elevator mechanics on a regular basis (they do by law) that is behind locked (special pick resistant) doors, and the super/maintenance/plumber needs to periodically check the bleeder values for unobstructed operations, which I am sure is always mandatory in large important installations.

    Really though, the problem would be more about lazy maintenance personel not doing there jobs, and not the electronics that control these systems. This guy needs to stop watching myth busters...

  16. IHSL by Bomazi · · Score: 1

    It is not possible to cause a properly designed elevator to crash or trap its occupants by a remote command, for the simple reason that the system only accepts a small set of safe commands. A command to change an operating parameter (like a speed, delay, etc...) is rejected if out of bounds. A command to stop will result in the elevator moving to the next floor, opening its doors and then shut down, i.e. going to a fail-safe state. There is no "crash and burn" command. So even if someone gets unauthorized access to the control network, the worse they can do is play pranks, reduce performance or deny service.

    1. Re:IHSL by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

      A few months ago, our building manager decided to upgrade our bathroom with the latest Cyrus Cybernetics Corporation sinks and toilets, which can see dimly into the future, thus turning on the faucet and soap dispenser just before you went to the bathroom. Of course this upgrade took 2 months and the bathroom was closed. So I had go to a different floor if I need to take a dump.

      I got into the elevator (apparently also upgraded by Cyrus Cybernetics Corporation) and pushed the "up" button. I started going up as expected. All of a sudden, it stopped, all of the lights came on at the same time and it started falling as fast as it could (the normal rate but when you are going down instead of up, it seems like a lot faster). The elevators were actually called down by the fireman where they sulked on the bottom floor for a few minutes before returning to normal service.

      You would not believe how creepy it when something like an elevator starts acting weird for no apparent reason. For a few seconds, I thought I would buy it splattered at the bottom or if I jumped like Bill Cosby, with my head sticking through the top:)

      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
  17. Complete lack of standards. A moral void... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is unacceptable to lie to people. It is disgusting to prey on the fear of people. I'd go so far as to say if you wrile people by fabricating outright lies in the hopes of inducing fear in order to generate revenue, well, you're a lower piece of scum than even someone in, say, the marketing business.

    So here we have yet another worthless Slashdot piece of excrement (some call them articles or stories) with (a) fabricated lies created to (b) induce fear and outrage in people, in the hope of (c) generating revenue. Congratulations, you've just created the Trifecta of Shameless Stupidity.

    On topic: Boilers have mechanical overpressure valves to blow off excess steam. Elevators have mechanical over-speed devices which, using a simple set of calibrated weights, cause a brake to be thrown on the car. This typically destroys a section of the railing on which the car rides, but the upside is, no dead people!

    I know it's tiring to hear this, but this place has become an embarrassment....

    1. Re:Complete lack of standards. A moral void... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article wasn't written by Slashdot. It was posted here to point out the fear mongering. This was obvious and you totally missed it.

  18. Great Priority List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess having meetings about cyber attacks is far sexier than allocating police resources to arrest burglars and get people their things back.

  19. Boilers and elevators have mechanical safeties by metoc · · Score: 1

    Most boiler and elevator design predates electronic/computerized controls so they have mechanical safeties.

    Thumbs up to everyone who said networking them to the Internet is a DUMB idea.

  20. Boolers ? or Tea pots ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then maybe the HTTP 418 answer will be of some use then

  21. Fear-mongering for fun & profit by quarkscat · · Score: 2

    Fear-mongering for fun & profit seems to be the new & improved USA business model, especially for governments at every level. Afraid of terrorists? Obviously, they are everywhere, and can strike at any time. Be afraid. Surrender all your rights & liberties, and (especially) your money to the government. The "war on terror" will save you, even from yourself. The DHS has spent over $1 Trillion fighting "terrorism" since its' founding. Is life without any risks whatsoever really living? And can one even prove that the benefit outweighs the cost, when success is only proven with a negative result? And the only positive results, aka real terrorism, for the past 25 years have been government promulgated?

    The "war on terror" is a black hole the USA throws money into, without actually making anyone safer. In fact, just the opposite is the case. Vastly increased sovereign debt threatens those very government programs & infrastructure that do help to keep us safe, healthy, and happy. Our infrastructure, like bridges, public health system, national power grid, water purification plants all suffer from competition with the "war on terror". OMG, man-made carbon dioxide is threatening us with global warming -- quick, let's ship all our industries overseas. OMG, there are religious fundamentalists half a world away that hate us for our freedoms -- quick, let's spend $4.5 Trillion in 10 years on perpetual warfare against these people. Surely they will not hate us any more if we drop money-bombs on them along with bloody expensive military ordinance, including their wedding parties and funerals. OMG, someone smuggled the equivalent of an M-80 firecracker in their pants onto a USA-bound plane -- quick, let's spend $250 Billion on terahertz-wave body scanners and place them everywhere, not just airports. Before we surrender more of our individual rights & liberties or more blood & treasure, let's get the answer to "Who benefits, and why?"

    The truth is, if you feel personally at risk of bodily harm due to acts of terrorism, go out and buy even 1 lottery ticket because the odds against you winning are only 1 in 175 Million, while an act of terrorism (a real act of terrorism not fabricated by government) is closer to 1 in 1,000 Million. Feeling "lucky" -- buy that lottery ticket. Ignore things like auto accidents with uninsured drunken drivers, or getting struck by lightening four weekends in a row when you go play golf.

    Industrial Control Systems have no business with internet access to operational processes, rather than merely an alarm or data monitoring channel, in any case.

    1. Re:Fear-mongering for fun & profit by Arker · · Score: 1

      Robert Anton Wilson said it many years ago, and ever since I read it, I have been watching it become more and more obvious and uncontrovertible every year since.

      "The number one cause of national insecurity is national security."

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  22. Re:industrial boilers blow up real good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those usually have physical fail-safe devices. You know, the kind that you can't disable remotely.
    Things that existed long before computers became prevalent are usually pretty safe. Of course, there are some dangerous things that are computer controlled and may have lethal effects if they don't operate properly, but usually because of some design error. If you want an example, read about the Therac-25 radiation therapy machine.

  23. We need a cyberwarfare defense organization by goodmanj · · Score: 1

    We definitely need to train an elite corps of cyberwarfare personnel to deal with this sort of threat. I propose dividing the corps up into three tactical teams:

    Alpha Team will carry out recon and patrol duties, identifying computer systems responsible for controlling potentially dangerous hardware systems.
    Bravo Team is responsible for extraction and isolation. Their mission is to walk up to these machines and unplug them from the Internet.
    Charlie Team is the counterinsertion team. They will be equipped with Mk 47 Hot Glue Guns. They will fill all available USB and network jacks on these computers with hot glue.

    That's it. Screw high tech cybersecurity, system patches, and all that bullshit. Just unplug 'em and permanently destroy all I/O paths to the outside world.

    1. Re:We need a cyberwarfare defense organization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reactor is going critical! We need to insert the override fob into the USB port, but someone filled it with hot glue!

      Brilliant.

      Captcha: Disarmed.

    2. Re:We need a cyberwarfare defense organization by goodmanj · · Score: 1

      If your reactor works this way, you had a serious safety problem long before I came in with the glue gun. I just made it obvious, so you're welcome.

  24. express mode is faster as they don't stop at each by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    express mode is faster as they don't stop at each each floor.

    Also there is a slow maintenance mode that also is in place.

    most elevator have manual maintenance controls on top of the cab.

  25. More concerned about negligence than ter'ists by holden+caufield · · Score: 1

    based on recent headlines like http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/16/nyregion/elevator-that-killed-yr-executive-was-undergoing-maintenance-city-says.html, I'd be more afraid of negligent elevator repair staff than of terrorists.

    --
    I'll create an amusing sig when I have something meaningful to post.
  26. elevator also have a fire mode by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    elevator also have a fire mode where they go to the lowest floor or lobby and hold the doors open.

    Now with the fireman's key you can move the elevator to any floor that you want (some times even floors that need a key card) and reject calls.

  27. Elevators? Imagine the problem's that would cause. by dohzer · · Score: 1

    People getting fit and losing weight from taking the stairs... Jesus; have these terrorists got no soul?

  28. And pedophiles can make keyboards emit fumes by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    to subdue children.

    It's 2012 - aren't we past this sort of "Only my Department can save you from the eBogeyman - with proper funding" yet?

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:And pedophiles can make keyboards emit fumes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Careful, if Fox news hears that bit of sarcasm I'm sure it'll be headline news for a week.

  29. Obv. the OP never lived in an NYC Apt. by mbstone · · Score: 1

    You mean that, through clever hacking, I can actually activate the boiler?? Like, when it gets cold?? No more listening to bullshit excuses from the landlord??

    Now I can quit banging on the pipes.

  30. Re:DUMB, MBA mind at work .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    None of this stuff should/needs to be re-configurable or commandable externally, that is why
    sosciety used to have lift engineers and boilermen.

    Tech, anal programming and MBA greed breaks anything.

  31. What about escalators? by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    All it takes is one terrorist with a chin-up bar and we are all doomed!

  32. Explode? by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

    What kind of idiot would design a boiler without a pressure relief valve? I think that would be only the kind that aren't allowed to design boilers.

  33. The writers a shill not an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He wants to sell 'cyber security' systems, consulting etc. so he shills for the possibility of attacks, which will be followed up by 'real' (or a pinch of truth and a lot of spin) attacks.

    FBI foiled a underpants terrorist, and it turns out, the terrorist was from the FBI. They 'infiltrated' an Al Qaeda cell, yet caught nobody except the underpants bomber who works for them????? How is this infiltrating anything? Seems like yet another case of FBI making up a bomb plot for itself to foil.

    Cyber consultants will tell you've they've foiled 50 cyber plots today against your company. Yet they will really be script kiddies tapping your SSH port on your company web server. Cyber underpants bombers again.

  34. Here's the video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This Brass Eye video is on the net:
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9031532194656768989

  35. How do you spell FUD? by dragisha · · Score: 1

    It wonders me to see a forum like slashdot not recognizing FUD tactics.

    This time, FUD targets everyone's stability and inspires fear from everything.

    "You are warned, don't tell you are not, once your elevator leaves for moon. With you inside."

    --
    http://opencm3.net, http://www.nongnu.org/gm2/
  36. Re:sand making machine by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

    Ok, spam for chinese jaw crushing machines. Now I can die in peace, I have seen everything.

    --
    Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
  37. No doubt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even furnaces in your home have a "limit switch", usually a set of dials + triggers, that tells it when to:

    ---

    1.) Turn off/on the heat (fire under the journals that the pilot light ignites)

    2.) How hot it can be before it turns it off the gas

    3.) The same for the fan motor too as #1 & #2 above.

    ---

    * Between that & devices like the thermocouple(s) + beso switches furnaces have, you're probably dead-on right!

    (I state that since I can't see a larger boiler NOT having the same general facilities for safety (and they're mechanical, not just some new-fangled digital control system for them like you see nowadays) OR better in more modern ones)...

    APK

    P.S.=> Disclaimer - I work on my furnaces myself: They're "older technology" than the "state-of-the-art" today, but I can't see them NOT being designed GENERALLY THE SAME @ LEAST for safety, as even older ones had the safety features I noted above - & at 1 point as a younger man (during the summers off school) I worked on INDUSTRIAL BOILERS (giant iron units that burned coal in power plants) to remove asbestos & replace it with different insulation coatings (thick stuff we sealed in thick paint too) - they were built like tanks & had safeties on them also... apk

  38. Re:express mode is faster as they don't stop at ea by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

    You might want a feature of sending a message over the network to indicate the elevator is stuck/overloaded/damaged or what have you. That should be hardware single direction data though.

    --
    Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  39. Faster elevators? by kmoser · · Score: 1

    I see faster elevators as a good thing. It would help people get where they're going more quickly.