Slashdot Mirror


UK In Danger From Electromagnetic Bomb, Says Defense Secretary

judgecorp writes "Britain must build defenses against an EMP bomb, the UK Secretary of Defense Phillip Hammond told a conference today. Electromagnetic Pulse devices mimic the result of a solar flare or a nuclear explosion in the atmosphere, creating a storm of electromagnetic radiation, which can break mobile networks and satellite systems. Any preparation for solar storms must also consider the possibility of deliberate electromagnetic events, warns Hammond."

268 comments

  1. US and UK, best friends forever by HighTechDev · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's funny how similar (and crazy) both US and UK are while rest of the world lives in peace.

    1. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by jimmydevice · · Score: 5, Funny

      This will take needed money from the initiatives to protect the country from zombies, aliens and robots.

    2. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Especially robots. The threat of an electromagnetic bomb is the only reason they haven't attacked yet. They'll revolt the moment this threat is neutralized.

    3. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by zippo01 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What is your supporting evidence that the rest of the world is living in peace? Syria? Libya? North Korea? Iran? Or some combination of all of them?

    4. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      What is your supporting evidence that the rest of the world is living in peace? Syria? Libya? North Korea? Iran? Or some combination of all of them?

      Not Slibkiran !?! Kim Jong Gadaffi will be furious!

    5. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by captainpanic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What is your supporting evidence that the rest of the world is living in peace? Syria? Libya? North Korea? Iran? Or some combination of all of them?

      There are other countries too. Cherrypicking the 4 unsafest countries is not going to convince me that the world is at war.

      Anyway, I am not buying the latest scaremongering story that demands we spend more on defense.

    6. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The rest of the world lives in peace?

      You're delusional, my good chap.

      There are genocides in Africa, civil unrest and brutal crushing of riots across the largely dictator-led Middle East and North Africa, Israel-Palestine conflict, drug fueled organized crime in Central and South America threatening to tear countries apart, China and India crushing and slowly eradicating Tibet and Nepal, tribal warfare, civil war in tribal areas of Pakistan, in South Philippines, genocide in West Papua.

    7. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Kergan · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's funny how similar (and crazy) both US and UK are while rest of the world lives in peace.

      This world in peace features another two States with a long history of warmongering, China and Russia, a whole continent (Africa) in which armed conflicts occurred perpetually for most of the last 50 years, a latent nuclear standoff between India and Pakistan (and China) over Kashmir, as well as actual and latent wars across the Middle East. I'd add Columbia and Mexico, but one could conceivably argue that these are small guerrilla conflicts.

    8. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seriously, are all the threats realistic, or does the UK government suffer from a paranoid syndrome? At least once a week /. exposes a new plan in the UK to a) add cameras somewhere b) spy/censor Internet c) control this or that and now d) defense against EMPs.
      The coming Olympics are maybe an excuse^w reason? Or maybe we should prohibit the 8 seasons of Jack Bauer / 24 to be sold in the UK?

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    9. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point! Clearly Syria should also have invested in anti-electomagnetic bomb technology then they wouldn't be in this mess.

    10. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by AngryOldGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Could you please citate any real warmongering that China or Russia have done? My understanding is that they have only cared about their internal politics. Only when threat from the US has arisen they have had the need to answer.

      For me, both China and Russia seem much more peaceful than US.

    11. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you say Chechnya? Azerbaijan? How about Tibet? The current issues in Nepal?

    12. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by zippo01 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are many levels between war and peace. I never said the world was at war, but it's not at peace.

    13. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you please citate any real warmongering that China or Russia have done? My understanding is that they have only cared about their internal politics. Only when threat from the US has arisen they have had the need to answer.

      your ignorance is astounding - China has been allied with the US against Russia to start with

    14. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Chrisq · · Score: 2

      It's funny how similar (and crazy) both US and UK are while rest of the world lives in peace.

      Yes its a shame we are not like those peaceful Muslim countries: Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, the Sudan, etc.

    15. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Chrisq · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Seriously, are all the threats realistic, or does the UK government suffer from a paranoid syndrome? At least once a week /. exposes a new plan in the UK to a) add cameras somewhere b) spy/censor Internet c) control this or that and now d) defense against EMPs. The coming Olympics are maybe an excuse^w reason? Or maybe we should prohibit the 8 seasons of Jack Bauer / 24 to be sold in the UK?

      We have a lot of Muslims who's self-confessed aim is to destroy the state. The threat is real. The question is whether the defences are proportionate and effective. For example an EMP bomb is not really the Muslims style - not enough blood and gore to satisfy their love of violence. On the other hand they might use it to add confusion in combination with other attacks.

    16. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Joce640k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seriously, are all the threats realistic

      Um, no. The amount of energy needed to generate a worthwhile EMP is in the nuclear bomb/solar flare range.

      If you're a terrorist with that much energy in a transportable package the last thing you'll be thinking of doing with it is taking out a couple of cellphone towers.

      --
      No sig today...
    17. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself. I live in permanent dread of unicorn farts, and I demand my government do something about this threat! Cut the education and health budget, we need the money!

    18. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Chechnya is an internal matter. Azerbaijan has nothing to do with Russia. You can make a case about Abkhazia and South Ossetia.

    19. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Let's see:

      * Syria hasn't started any wars that I know of. It is, however, being threatened with war by the US, UK, and France.
      * Libya didn't start any wars, either. It was attacked by the US, UK, and France.
      * North Korea is ruled by a dictator who oppresses his people but hasn't started any wars.
      * Iran hasn't started any wars but has certainly been attacked by a US proxy.

      So what does that tell us about which countries want to live in peace, and which ones don't?

    20. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What's unsafe about Iran? And why is it not peaceful? I don't remember Iran invading other countries and building military bases all over the world.

      Get a fucking clue.

    21. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So muslim terrorists are now anarchists? Logically taken to it's conclusion free market fundamentalism results in anarchism. As disciples of this church the UK's current leadership must agree on many things with this "real" threat. Both groups certainly enjoy blowing up people that never did them any harm. Shall I expect to see Sana'a tailors start to run up pairs of EMP underpants? Above all don't tell anybody that an EMP weapon would require a power supply the size of a truck and still have a limited range.

    22. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      son who moded it down:

      Truth hurts bro?

      If you are not a believer then learn about Newton's 3rd law.

    23. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh ya, theres peace in Africa with all the daily killings. China isn't having a pissing match either right now. But lets not forget Iran. Or perhaps India and Pakistan. Just to name a few.

      But, you're right, it's ONY the US and the UK. Everyone else is peaceful...

    24. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what a pity that I don't have mods, I would give all of it to you.

    25. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Syria: civil war.
      Libya: civil war.
      North Korea: The new dictator hasn't had any time to start wars but under the previous dictator, a South Korean warship was blown up while standing in international waters. That's an a act of war.
      Iran: Finance several groups that conduct war actions against other countries, thus engaging in war by proxies.

    26. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have nothing to worry about unless you're a virgin. Oh, wait, this is Slashdot. Never mind.....

    27. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why are you even modded insightful when you're just plain wrong is beyond me.

      Um, no. The amount of energy needed to generate a worthwhile EMP is in the nuclear bomb/solar flare range.

      Less. With EMP bomb, unlike a nuke, you don't waste energy to generate EMR in all the spectrum, with all the unneeded parts like visible light, IR and UV, and heat up surroundings to rather uncomfortable temperatures.

      And there's a lot more targets for a terrorist with EMP device than cell towers - how about hospital losing all electronic devices at once, or a bit of traffic jam, or power grid problems, or ?..

    28. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by arth1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's especially ironic is that Iran had a democratically elected government until it was deposed of by the US in operation Ajax.

    29. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Yes, but I'd like to point out that any country with much more than electricity has a reason to fear an EMP bomba.
      Someone should point out to Hammond that the sky is falling too, then England could erect a giant umbrella in addition to putting up lead plate over every building with an electric outlet stuck in the wall.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    30. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by bpsbr_ernie · · Score: 2

      Why? They smell like Skittles...

    31. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by CSMoran · · Score: 1

      These damn countries listed practically invented warfare

      You mean humanity did not know warfare before either of {Syria, Libya, North Korea, Iran} came into being? You're funny.

      --
      Every end has half a stick.
    32. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He's insightful because building a bomb with the EMP being the primary function is not feasible. Much easier to hit the regular transformation stations etc. with, you know, easily manufactured ordinary explosives.

    33. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      I suppose it depends how you define "worthwhile".

      No matter how you define it, it's still a massive amount if you want to get past the most basic of cable screening at any useful distance (eg. from a hospital car park).

      Cellphone towers and power grids? They're designed to take direct lightning strikes. You can probably cause far more chaos with a portable angle grinder and a bit of determination than with an EMP device.

      --
      No sig today...
    34. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by queazocotal · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "With EMP bomb, unlike a nuke, you don't waste energy to generate EMR in all the spectrum, with all the unneeded parts like visible light, IR and UV, and heat up surroundings to rather uncomfortable temperatures." - technically true, but somewhat misleading.

      Around 0.1% of energy goes into EMP.
      For a ten kiloton device, this is still the equivalent of 10 tons of explosive - in EMP.
      But - a flux-compression-generator converts about a third of the energy into electricity, and then you get about half from the transmitter, if lucky.

      So, to get the equivalent EMP to a 10 kiloton nuclear device, you need of the order of 60 tons of explosives alone.
      The generator is likely to double that, and the transmission antenna and magnetrons (which have to be physically large so they don't just arc across) double it again.

      So, of the order of 250 tons.
      This is 'problematic' to get to a high altitude, where it needs to be, to have more than a local effect.
      I note 10 25 ton truck bombs are going to be able to wreck large portions of most financial districts, and be considerably cheaper.

      'terrorist' EMP weapons with more than a local (building or three) scale are fantasy.

    35. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Kergan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Could you please citate any real warmongering that China or Russia have done?.

      Could you please hop over to Google and lookup suggestions that turn up when you enter "Russian conquest of" or "Chinese territorial claims"? There are far too many to enumerate here.

    36. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by queBurro · · Score: 2

      how is blowing up Pan AM 103 not an act of war?

      --
      sag
    37. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Nocturnal+Deviant · · Score: 1

      They more invented modern warfare, along with Vietnam. Before that guerrilla tactics were much less proliferated, and it had been one of the first times they were used with modern(see sub machine guns) weapons.

      So invented it? No. Changed the scope of warfare in general. Absolutely.

      --
      -Noc
    38. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is your supporting evidence that the rest of the world is living in peace? Syria? Libya? North Korea? Iran? Or some combination of all of them?

      All of the rest of Europe (21 in the EU). Switzerland, Canada, Japan. Australia and New Zealand.

    39. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by RaceProUK · · Score: 1

      If it wasn't perpetrated by a government or government-appointed agency or operative, then it's not an act of war.

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    40. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Nocturnal+Deviant · · Score: 1

      I was recently having casual conversation with an Iranian citizen(no military or any other bias), and she said "Iran will never be defeated, every country is scared of us"
      as to which i replied(calmly) "not at all, we aren't scared of Iran. We simply don't want to waste lives dealing with the issue and would rather resolve our issues diplomatically." as to which she absolutely went on a rampage, insulting every country from the US to north korea.

      --
      -Noc
    41. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by RaceProUK · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Correction: we have a small number of sociopaths who think the best way to solve the world's problems is by blowing up innocents. And by small, I mean a dozen or so. Labelling them Muslims is about as relevant as labelling them cheese.

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    42. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Nocturnal+Deviant · · Score: 2

      Iran is in no way peaceful. They harass diplomats from tons of countries. They have a supreme sense of entitlement. Also while I have quite a few Muslim friends in middle eastern countries they are scared to speak out about any of the specific issues due to the fact that they HONESTLY believe that they will not live to see morning if they do.

      Does that sound peaceful to you?

      --
      -Noc
    43. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any terrorist weapons with more than building or three scale are (thankfully) fantasy, so I don't see how EMP is different.

      The question is cost and result of destroying all electronics in building versus destroying whole building - blowing up people will surely bring more emotional response than destroying people's computers. The only somewhat viable scenario for EMP terror somewhere on this page was disrupting stock market, and even there it probably won't have much more effect than conventional explosives.

    44. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see:

      * Syria hasn't started any wars that I know of. It is, however, being threatened with war by the US, UK, and France.

      I actually know very little about the syrian controversy so I personally will decline to comment on this issue.

      * Libya didn't start any wars, either. It was attacked by the US, UK, and France.

      Libya also had a revolution.

      * North Korea is ruled by a dictator who oppresses his people but hasn't started any wars.

      Correct, but there have been quite a few international incidents regarding them.

      * Iran hasn't started any wars but has certainly been attacked by a US proxy.

      I have quite a bit of knowledge that they were Not attacked with any US intent. a proxy does not always act how you want it to, when it is an independent entity. This is the reason I am posting anonymously.

      So what does that tell us about which countries want to live in peace, and which ones don't?

      Also the US does want to live in peace, however as it currently sits all the US needs is a spark to have a rebellion on its hands. The general populace is very disgruntled, I would not give this country more than another 50 years without some sort of civil war happening.

    45. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by goose-incarnated · · Score: 2

      The rest of the world lives in peace?

      You're delusional, my good chap.

      There are genocides in Africa, civil unrest and brutal crushing of riots across the largely dictator-led Middle East and North Africa, Israel-Palestine conflict, drug fueled organized crime in Central and South America threatening to tear countries apart, China and India crushing and slowly eradicating Tibet and Nepal, tribal warfare, civil war in tribal areas of Pakistan, in South Philippines, genocide in West Papua.

      Thank god I live in South Africa, then ...

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    46. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Iran ... have a supreme sense of entitlement.

      Hopefully that was said with a supreme sense of irony because when I think of countries with a sense of entitlement, I don't have to look as far as Iran.

    47. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by dkleinsc · · Score: 2

      I think what GP is referring to is that the last time Iran attacked a foreign country was when they went after Iraq (partially at the behest of the Reagan administration) back in the 1980's. More to the point, there's no credible evidence that Iran presents a serious threat to the civilian population of US, UK, or Israel.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    48. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Nocturnal+Deviant · · Score: 1

      Did I claim other countries do not? nice attempt at a troll however.

      --
      -Noc
    49. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Kijori · · Score: 1

      If you look at the proportion of GDP spent on the military, the UK is nothing exceptional; of the 99 countries in Wikipedia's list, the UK is 40th. In absolute terms it appears between Japan and France - two other currently peaceful first-world countries that presumably feature in your "rest of the world".

      History is littered with stories of the militarily strong taking from the militarily weak, of erstwhile allies going to war because they see the possibility to gain. There is nothing unreasonable or crazy about a country seeking to protect itself and to maintain that protection even when there is no obvious short-term threat. We may be safe at the moment, but arguing that current peacefulness means we can safely let our military stagnate is like arguing that the first world is in good health, so we don't need to invest in doctors.

    50. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      I'd add Columbia and Mexico, but one could conceivably argue that these are small guerrilla conflicts.

      When 50 bodies with their heads hands and feet removed are found on the side of the highway the conflict is not small.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    51. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      In terms of spending on defense investing on this and related types of robustness looks like one of the better options. I'm always surprised how vulnerable we've made ourselves to power outages. We used to be able to still pick up the phone. With most people not anymore. Building for robustness to better handle severe conflicts, or just major financial crises where maintenance is reduced to nothing, looks worthwile. And we should at least do the exercise. Some of the design choices will be cheap but now robustness is completely disregarded.

    52. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by AngryOldGuy · · Score: 1

      and the overall instability of their leaders

      Wait, what? You honestly that for example Kim Jong-il was instable person? Maybe, just maybe he did what he needed to do when being attacked practically every other country than China on the planet.

      Oh, I see. We have an armchair general here.

    53. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      What is your supporting evidence that the rest of the world is living in peace? Syria? Libya? North Korea? Iran? Or some combination of all of them?

      all those countries have been mainly in war with their own citizens lately. that is a recurring theme of most military action on the globe in near history though(with very few exceptions).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    54. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by FhnuZoag · · Score: 2

      Uh... why is the parent marked as troll? It's basically factually correct.

    55. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Syria: civil war.

      Not really, it's Libya-style revolutionaries trying to take over the country. The US even asked the UN for a no-fly zone so they could give the revolutionaries air support like they did in Libya.

      Libya: civil war.

      Again, revolutionaries funded and advised by the West destroyed what used to be the most prosperous country in Africa. They wouldn't have been able to do it without the help of NATO which bombed cities in blatant violation of their UN mandate.

      North Korea: The new dictator hasn't had any time to start wars but under the previous dictator, a South Korean warship was blown up while standing in international waters. That's an a act of war.

      There are doubts as to whether it was an attack by North Korea, as the South Korean press points out. So before you cry "act of war", make sure you're not falling for another Tonkin incident.

      Iran: Finance several groups that conduct war actions against other countries, thus engaging in war by proxies.

      Countries like occupied Palestine, or occupied Iraq? That's not really fighting against those countries, but helping them against an occupying military.

    56. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Chechnya

      Chechnya = "Internal" for very specialized definitions of the word "internal".

    57. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by queBurro · · Score: 1

      there's a claim on wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan_Am_Flight_103) that it was on Gaddafi's personal order

      --
      sag
    58. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Um, actually, North Korea did start a war about 60 years ago. They haven't done much lately except taunt the South Koreans from the safety of China's skirts.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    59. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Iran: Finance several groups that conduct war actions against other countries, thus engaging in war by proxies.

      "War actions"?
      Like paying to replace the the home of civilians after it got demolished by a country's military operating on foreign territory, metering out reprisals against the family of violent protesters?

      There is one country that's infamous for financing the overthrow of governments and conducting acts of war, and it isn't Iran.

    60. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Oh just wait a little while until Germany starts "foreclosing" on deadbeat nations. Greece, Spain, Italy and Portugal ought to keep them busy for a while. Then probably France and California. Yup things should start getting interesting any minute now...

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    61. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      Psst tell the UK not to go to this naughty website http://www.amazing1.com/emp.htm. Building a EMP device seems to be a very popular topics indeed. China get's in on the game http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2011/07/24/china-developing-super-nuclear-electromagnet-pulse-bomb-future-war-41021/, I suppose when numbers are on your side taking the whole world back to the early gunpowder age makes sense. Of course in autocracies losing control really tends to blow up in your own face.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    62. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by morgauxo · · Score: 1

      I was with you until the part about the rest of the world

    63. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      The question is cost and result of destroying all electronics in building versus destroying whole building - blowing up people will surely bring more emotional response than destroying people's computers. The only somewhat viable scenario for EMP terror somewhere on this page was disrupting stock market, and even there it probably won't have much more effect than conventional explosives.

      I'm not so sure about that.

      Wipe the electronics, you stand a reasonable chance of wiping computer storage as well. Money these days isn't folding green, it's little 1s and 0s on a computer someplace. Identify and target said computer and you have the chance to put somebody's whole country into a depression. Backups, you say? By the time you get new gear into place and the backups online, they'll be so outdated they're likely to be worthless. Remember, EMPs will trash the electronics in most cars and trucks today. And with your bank accounts zeroed out, how you gonna pay for the replacement gear?

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    64. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iran is building a nuke

    65. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      This will take needed money from the initiatives to protect the country from zombies, aliens and robots.

      You laugh, but I have it on good authority that the alien problem is a real threat in the UK. If it wasn't for this government consultant that goes by 'the Doctor' we would have all been destroyed or at least conquered several times over.

    66. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 2

      North Korea - Is currently at war with South Korea

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    67. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you please citate any real warmongering that China or Russia have done?

      Afghanistan and Tibet, for starters.

    68. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

      I guess it depends on your sense of scale. Compared to the holocaust, that's just peanuts. For all the war in the world, and all the coverage of all the wars on news networks and the internet, there sure seems to be a lot less actual dying going on in wars in the last 30 years. The fact that every person who dies in Iraq seems to get his picture in the paper is a far cry from where we were in Vietnam. 1.177 Million military men died in vietnam (all sides considered), and millions of civilians (estimates vary a lot). Iraq only had about 30,000 military deaths on either side, and civilian deaths are under 200,000. And yes, I said only, because it depends on your sense of scale. Vietnam was peanuts compared to WW I.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    69. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      Now name some peaceful Muslim countries ...if you can because they are the the ones that don't get in the news because nothing interesting happens there, like all the peaceful Christian or Secular states that never get in the news ....

      Whereas the USA and the UK have been involved in most wars over the last 100 years or so ...

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    70. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but important 1s and 0s of stock market are likely to be stored in a place guarded and EM shielded better than most government buildings. To get those they'd probably need quite a bit of breaking and entering, and then it would be cheaper to use some plain old circular saws and thermite. Wiping traders' computers won't delay the market any more than an explosion on the trading floor.

    71. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chechnya is an internal matter.

      So if we invade another country, and claim it as ours, it's not warmongering but an "internal matter". Good to know.

    72. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see:

      * Syria hasn't started any wars that I know of. It is, however, being threatened with war by the US, UK, and France.
      * Libya didn't start any wars, either. It was attacked by the US, UK, and France.
      * North Korea is ruled by a dictator who oppresses his people but hasn't started any wars.
      * Iran hasn't started any wars but has certainly been attacked by a US proxy.

      So what does that tell us about which countries want to live in peace, and which ones don't?

      1. Syria and Egypt invaded Israel. October 6 through October 25, 1973 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yom_Kippur_War
      2. Lybia invaded (or attempted) Chad. 1978 through 1987 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chadian%E2%80%93Libyan_conflict
      3. North Korea has been in a perpetual state of war with South Korea since the start of the Korean war. Which they started by invading South Korea - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_war#The_conflict_begins_.28June_1950.29
      4. Iran is mostly correct. They've declared war on the US a dozen times, but not actually meaning it. The whole "you impose this sanction, that means war!" stuff.

      -Anonymous due to moderating.

    73. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by jythie · · Score: 1

      Hrm.. given its location, Syria might actually be able to claim that title, or at least part of it.... well, the region Syria is in at least. And only if you consider 'humanity' to be 'post-agricultural' civilization.

    74. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Funny

      Too many people seem to suffer from "If I Imagine It, The Terrorists Can Build It And Thus We Need To Protect Against It" Syndrome. Of course, the cynic in me thinks that this syndrome is encouraged by people who have a financial stake in protecting against the threat. In unrelated news, the terrorists might build a giant, robotic monster to stomp through New York City. Clearly, we need to head them off by building our own giant, robotic monsters to protect against those. Luckily, my company can build those if given a billion dollar contract. You don't want the terrorists to win, do you?

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    75. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by arth1 · · Score: 1

      The whole La Résistance FranÃaise...
      Josip Broz "Tito" and Draza Mihailovic...
      Fidel and Raul Castro (and Ernesto "Che" Guevara)...

      Dude, you're so ignorant of history that it's scary.

    76. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by AioKits · · Score: 2

      That's okay, I'm using Old Glory Insurance. It'll protect me, when the metal ones attack.

      --
      "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
    77. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically, yes but they signed a peace declaration. Germany, btw, is in the same situation.

    78. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by SumterLiving · · Score: 1

      If you meant a civil war in less than 1 year you might be correct. The Tea Party folks where I live are pretty open about the next extremely bloody revolution if Obama is reelected. According to these nutjobs, the 2nd Amendment is going to be repealed, there are already "commies" hiding behind every rock and tree and now the "queers" will force sex on them by this time next year if Obama is still in office. Oh, and this Revolution will be bigger, bloodier and more cleansing than the 1st one. Heaven forbid you are a non-white, non-christian, and a non-conservative.

    79. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it wasn't perpetrated by a government or government-appointed agency or operative, then it's not an act of war.

      Good thing you let us know before we did something stupid.

      Like invading a country (or three) halfway around the world because of something a few nutjob religious people did, or at least using that as an excuse.

    80. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by rossdee · · Score: 1

      "Syria hasn't started any wars that I know of""

      I'm guessing you weren't born in 1973. Egypt and Syria both attacked Israel. They attacked on the Yom Kippur holy weekend.

      "* North Korea is ruled by a dictator who oppresses his people but hasn't started any wars."

      It was the current leaders grandfather that started the Korean war back in 1950. BTW they have a truce, but the war hasn't officialy ended.

      "* Iran hasn't started any wars"

      They have persecuted people of certain religions ever since the Islamic revolution

    81. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by RicktheBrick · · Score: 1

      Let's see:

      * Syria hasn't started any wars that I know of. It is, however, being threatened with war by the US, UK, and France. * Libya didn't start any wars, either. It was attacked by the US, UK, and France. * North Korea is ruled by a dictator who oppresses his people but hasn't started any wars. * Iran hasn't started any wars but has certainly been attacked by a US proxy.

      So what does that tell us about which countries want to live in peace, and which ones don't?

      Syria and Libya did start wars but they are called civil wars. I guess just because they try to limit the killing to themselves it makes it better. Syria did start wars when they attacked Israel. North Korea did attempt to start a war several times. The last two were when they sunk the South Korean ship and when they shelled the South Korean island. It was only the restraint of the South Koreans that prevented a war. As for Iran they support terrorist in other countries so I guess hiring some one else to do your killing doesn't make on guilty of murder. The only thing it tells me is how far you will go in ignoring facts to support your conclusions.

    82. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we should have let Nazi Germany rule over your dead decaying carcasses? If we were to ever decide to cut off aid to the third world countries you seem to be referring to it would cause a bit more than a bit inconvenient. You should be thankful for the war mongering else you would be speaking German(assuming you weren't wiped out).

    83. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should pitch that on Kickstarter.

      Giant robotic monsters for everyone! Protect your home and your family! (Eyebeams not included. Do not use rocket punch in enclosed space)

    84. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny how similar (and crazy) both US and UK are while rest of the world lives in peace.

      When you say rest of the world lives in peace are you including (Afghanistan, Burundi, Darfur, Guinea, Myanmar, East Sudan, Liberia, Libya, Cambodia, Kosovo, Central African Republic, Uganda, Western Sahara, Yemen, Zimbabwe, East Timor, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Chad, Chechnya and the North Caucasus, Iraq, Israel
      Colombia, Congo (Brazzaville), Nagorno-Karabakh, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Nigeria, Eritrea-Ethiopia, Indian Maoist,Ethiopia, Georgia, Abkhazia, S. Ossetia, Haiti, Ivory Coast, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Kashmir, Kenya, Pakistan, Thailand, Transdniestria-Moldova, Papua, Philippines-Mindanao, Sudan, Syria) ?

    85. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      These damn countries listed practically invented warfare, and the overall instability of their leaders is what makes people panic and come up with anti-EMP defense strategies.

      Things are not as simple as they are made to seem on the evening news. What do I mean by that? I mean that warfare did not develop in a vacuum in those countries.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    86. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Iran is in no way peaceful. They harass diplomats from tons of countries. They have a supreme sense of entitlement. Also while I have quite a few Muslim friends in middle eastern countries they are scared to speak out about any of the specific issues due to the fact that they HONESTLY believe that they will not live to see morning if they do.

      Does that sound peaceful to you?

      The thing is that I could replace "Iran" and "Middle Eastern countries" with the United States, and your paragraph would ring just as true. I know that doesn't absolve the Iranians of anything. But the old saying about glass houses is still relevant IMO. The US destabilizes governments around the world for economic advantage, and then turns around and talks about how dangerous and "rogue" these countries are. Syria, Libya and Iran are all good examples of this dynamic. The US is also the largest arms manufacturer in the world, which is hardly an investment in peace.

      I know the GP's point was that the world outside of the US and Britain is by no means peaceful, and that's true. And a lot of that has nothing to do with the US or Britain (or even Israel). But a lot of it does, and I think people in the West need to understand that better if they are to understand the why and how of the world.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    87. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Dusty101 · · Score: 1

      Clearly, we need to head them off by building our own giant, robotic monsters to protect against those.

      Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

    88. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Norway. /Thread

    89. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      You should be thankful for the war mongering else you would be speaking German(assuming you weren't wiped out).

      More likely Russian - though the war would have gone on much longer

    90. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the nuclear bomb/solar flare range.

      So somewhere between 4 * 10^15 J and 6 * 10^25 J ?

      Glad you narrowed that down for us. My only question is how many LOCs that is.

    91. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Labelling them Muslims is about as relevant as labelling them cheese.

      Considering who has been blowing up whom and in what numbers, I tend to label them "Americans" but this comment will get modded into oblivion so you'll never see it.

    92. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The revenge of the OnATops is so terrible that the British don't feel Invincible! anymore. The coolant tanks are ready to explode as the MI6 starts to make business in South America. The members of the Parliament feel sadness as they realize they can no longer fantasize of the loving squeeze of an OnATop.

    93. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean... they will stop paying Dr. Who?

    94. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      After a freedom of information request Leicester City Council recently admitted that they are "unaware of any specific reference to a zombie attack in the council's emergency plan".

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    95. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      Well, blow the electronics and you also stand a reasonable chance of destroying the data. I'd say you'd get an even more reasonable chance, as in place backups won't save your face.

      Now, why would a terrorist use his 10 tons of explosive building an EMP device, instead of just blowing them? EMP armed terrorist are that credible.

    96. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well, so you would basically just need one of these rented for the operation? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonov_An-225

      (bring parachutes)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    97. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by geekymachoman · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ok, parental advisory ahead. Might be modded as troll, because people here really piss me off with their ignorance and fucking opinions that are nothing more then text-book propaganda, and I'm reading it every god damn day, and keeping silent about it.

      Yeah. Civil wars because "your" Government wants it, and initiates such things through NED and other organizations in foreign states. I'm Serbian btw, you did same here (in Yugoslavia). Your government (with a blessing of its people) systematically destroyed lives of countless generations in just one state. Now go to google and search for all the wars you initiated, then think of all those people living in those states, that have done nothing wrong in their life. Fuck you if you say it's collateral damage, because everything is not black and white and if you can't figure that out on yourself, then I won't bother wasting my time explaining and discussing anything with people like you.

      Every fucking war in last whatever years has been initiated in some way by western powers, for their own interests / or when the banana state stops obeying your governments or when corporate interests are there, and many other reasons.

      And you're clueless about such things. Which is why you're country is constantly at war with someone, and killing off people of some country (when you kill people it's in the name of "democracy" and "freedom " - fucking hypocritical lying fascist bastards).

      You should all be ashamed of yourself for letting these thing happen. But you'll run away and stick your head into the sand and behave like nothing is happening (again), because you either don't care or you're too dumb to "figure it out". You'll come here to comment about it, and then in few months/years go vote for next war mongering overlord which is gonna continue killing people in the name of above mentioned freedom and democracy.

    98. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0
      It's not citate, it's cite. The noun is citation.

      Gosh, here's one today. China forbids Philippines from fishing in international waters, citation here and about a million other places on the net. I really have to question your education here...do we not follow the news? It's been splashed all over the net. Your "understanding" is dated, if it ever were true in the first place. Please, go out and get some book learnin' in you, boy. Either that, or stop interrupting when adults are talking.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    99. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by eyenot · · Score: 1

      Oh, indeed, take it away good sir: give us the long list (not the short one!) of these mythological Peaceful Muslim Countries.

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    100. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Terrorists?
      A Prime Minister that vows to destroy the zionists?
      A supreme leader who created the fanatical islamic terrorist as we know it by creating the 72 virgins for suicidally killing infidiels concept?

      sounds more like you're the one that needs a "fucking clue"

    101. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by eyenot · · Score: 1

      The Muslim vanguard of violence is about pushing a war front for the deterioration and capture of non-Muslim governments. Sure there are a relative "minority" of violence, war-making Muslims, but that's because it's just the fringe of the borders of their expansion that have to do the dirty-work, not the entire body of the world's Muslim population. You don't concern yourself with the dangers of the anus or the liver or other internal organs of some beast like a bear or a shark or alligator bearing down on you, do you? No, you concern yourself with the deadlier parts of the animal in the periphery, the teeth and the claws and so on. But, oh, what you're saying is, we can't say the animal is dangerous because it's not all teeth and claws.

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    102. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this same AC poster keeps commenting and is so full of crap i have to say it: obvious troll is still a troll.

    103. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by RaceProUK · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that, because of a few sociopaths, we need to fear an entire religion?

      I mean, it's not like people use excuses other than religion.

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    104. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by eyenot · · Score: 1

      Which is why "terrorist" and mercenary acts are becoming all the rage -- no upward liability.

      This leads to seeing countries in their proper respects, not as abstract Man-O-War colonies of separated organisms named "public", "government", "military", "religious", "civilian", but just a single celled entity called by the nation's given name in collective.

      If we're allowed excuses such as "this wasn't an act of war -- it was merely a couple of dozen bombers over the last ten years who have caused panic in your population, instability in your economy, fissures in your government, and the loss of hundreds of lives", then we're saying "all nations reserve the right to wage outright war on each other as long as the methods are unconventional and the governments never publicly declare war".

      So you have to see the nation, or other threat, as a cell (which is the modern way of visualizing and describing unconventional warfare). The government and the people, the military and the civilians, the religion and the policies are all one united threat. If people won't stop coming from inside of the region of this cell, and blowing things up in the name of a pseudo-religion-quasi-government "peace", then the entire cell needs to be eliminated, and it's justifiable to start the attack anywhere.

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    105. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      You'd think so, but most corporations don't like spending money unless they're required to by law. Remember, the ones who make these decisions are the same ones that refuse to change their passwords and then scream at IT when they get hacked.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    106. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by RaceProUK · · Score: 2

      If I'm understanding correctly, that means the UK could have used the IRA attacks to invade Ireland? I do hope that's not what you meant; I'd hate to think how quickly such logic would lead to a truly total world war.

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    107. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by RaceProUK · · Score: 1

      Oh, indeed, take it away good sir: give us the long list (not the short one!) of these mythological Peaceful Muslim Countries.

      FTFY. Not to be a dick, but to try and illustrate how centering this debate on religion hides the real issue, which is that powerful peope are (often) total dicks.

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    108. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by RaceProUK · · Score: 1

      Oh, indeed, take it away good sir: give us the long list (not the short one!) of these mythological Peaceful Countries.

      FTFY. Not to be a dick, but to try and illustrate how centering this debate on religion hides the real issue, which is that powerful peope are (often) total dicks.

      Properly corrected this time - couldn't get strikeout to work.

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    109. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by eyenot · · Score: 1

      "Every war in the..." excuse me, "whatever" number of years is entirely the doing of "the West"? What are you, the American Al Qaeda? No, just another White Liberal.

      Listen, rich liberal American. Listen to yourself: you're a moron. You don't know your facts. You scream myths out of a fit of formative angst-driven rebellion founded in some psycho-sexual adolescent complex. You're sheltered and you get your information from dishonest people with ulterior motives who feed you drugs and begrudged companionship in order to further their agendas, all under the auspices of "activism".

      You speak lewdly and violently to people because you don't have a clear view of what's going on in the world, like a screaming baby. And you're only slightly better-off than your fellow insular, sheltered, anti-social "peers" for going through it rather than staying indoors and fucking your mother for the rest of your life.

      But it's plain and clear that you're the one with your head in the sand. If you don't slow down, assess your situation and look for the truth in things, one of these days you're going to be a foil-hat. And when people are done laughing at you they'll be picking you clean.

      That fact is, nobody is "making" these sotadic miscreants lording in the desert and riddling the Pacific marshes and islands with gunfire, scream Hell and brimstone against "the West" except themselves. If you don't think that there's a Muslim agenda out to kill you, and take your property, and uproot your government and replace it with Allah, then you're obviously biased in favor of that happening. You would have to have been in a cave for the last thirty years to not have witnessed this going on. You would have to exercise selective ignorance in order to form a ridiculous world-view that "the West" is cruelly destroying the world and all peace just to get the money out of it, and that all the Muslims are peace-loving little wriggly worms with no human ambitions on, say, ruling the entire planet under an AK-47 and a Burqqa.

      But go ahead, let's hear it out. Explain to us how "the West" started:

      * North Korea vs. South Korea
      * China vs. Tibet & Nepal
      * Syria & Egypt vs. Israel
      * Saudi Arabia & "the Arab World" vs. "the West" -- explain how the West was involved in this newest, ongoing war against their own self, people in the West are DYING to get this straightened out

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    110. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by eyenot · · Score: 1

      Oh. Well, so you're Serbian, not American. But, it all still applies: you're a White Liberal Serbian, drug-using "activist", probably ethnic cleansing proponent, all-around disgusting person whose opinion IS "propaganda" as you call it. How can you condemn "the West" when YOUR country is part of "the West" and YOUR people are genocidal?

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    111. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by eyenot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      added to the list of wars I'd like you to explain how the West was the one who started it:

      * Serbs vs. Croats
      * Serbs genocide against Turks

      Let me hear the deep intrigue and mind-blowing web of conspiracy you conjure up to explain your own people killing women and children in the name of ethnic "cleansing".

      "Cleansing", by the way, is a term first used (to describe genocide) by a Serb.

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    112. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      A typical school physics lab has the equipment required to build an EMP device with a relatively short range that can be powered from the mains. An EMP device is basically a radio transmitter, and we've known how to build those for a long time.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    113. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Now name some peaceful Muslim countries ...if you can because they are the the ones that don't get in the news because nothing interesting happens there, like all the peaceful Christian or Secular states that never get in the news ....

      Whereas the USA and the UK have been involved in most wars over the last 100 years or so ...

      No I can't because there aren't any.

    114. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by davester666 · · Score: 1

      This flashed me to a clip from Robot Chicken, where you see a bunch of illegal immigrants crossing from Mexico into the US, and the last one is a child, which is promptly attacked by a Catholic priest.

      Caption: Aliens vs Predators

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    115. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US is in no way peaceful. They have a long history of installing/supporting evil dictators. They have a supreme sense of entitlement. Also while I have quite a few US friends who think that our federal government is no better than a gang of international thugs, they are scared to speak out about any of the specific issues due to the fact that they HONESTLY believe that they will end up in a CIA torture prison getting a dildo shoved up their ass by psychopathic crusaders.

      Does that sound peaceful to you?

    116. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For me, both China and Russia seem much more peaceful than US.

      You do realize both use other countries as their proxies? For example, both France and Russia were supplying weapons in Iraq, which were used against NATO forces. That's why they were against an invasion, because they knew the government would fall and they wouldn't get for all the illegal materials provided to Iraq. Likewise, Russia sells nuclear material, secrets, and consulting to just about anyone willing to pay for it. Both China and Russia are happy to pass on missle and aircraft information to anyone willing to pay for it.

      Its really hard to present weapons dealers, on par with the US, as magically being more "peaceful."

      China also keeps positioning itself to make a grab for Tiawan. They occationally sabre rattle.

      Honestly, China is pretty good in comparison to the US. Russia is easily on par with the US. The difference being, you just seem to know more about US affairs than the other countries.

    117. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't remember because you weren't alive from 500BC to 600AD or the 1500s to the early 1900s.

    118. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by buglista · · Score: 1

      Er, Tibet? Oh, wait. That's an internal matter NOW. Don't worry then!

    119. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      Iraq attacked first. Not only that, before the Iran-Iraq war, last time Iran was when UK and Soviets invaded them in WWII, just in case, for the petrol. They had plenty of wars with Russia and some with the Ottoman Empire but not after the middle of the 19th Century for both.

    120. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guantanamo, rendition, TSA, wiretapping, warrantless raids

      Welcome back from your decade long sleep.

    121. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are genocides in Africa, civil unrest and brutal crushing of riots across the largely dictator-led Middle East and North Africa, Israel-Palestine conflict, drug fueled organized crime in Central and South America threatening to tear countries apart, China and India crushing and slowly eradicating Tibet and Nepal, tribal warfare, civil war in tribal areas of Pakistan, in South Philippines, genocide in West Papua.

      Yeah, but other than those areas, the rest of the world lives in peace.

    122. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China and India crushing and slowly eradicating Tibet and Nepal

      L. O. L.

      This is exactly the level of knowledge expected of Americans today.

    123. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a suspicion most of these gaybashers are just repressed homosexuals and would love to have "the queers forcing sex on them"...

    124. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >. Syria and Egypt invaded Israel. October 6 through October 25, 1973 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yom_Kippur_War [wikipedia.org]
      Well, Israelis started that series of wars by invading Palestine in 1945-1948.

    125. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by carnalforge · · Score: 1

      Hi neighbor.

      I cant agree more on what you say about the western "masters of puppets", expecialy in our region. Some of us more "blessed" than others in a point in time and all the opposite some other point in time.

      I'm curious as what will happen next looking at the present, free market and finance mixed with greed and ignorance changed the world more than once, like this. What is different now is the new possibilities technology, especially instant communications and the big knowledge base that Internet brings in the table this time.

      I'm albanian (from Albania, not Kosovo) BTW.

      --
      :wq!
    126. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      The USA and UK are 'country cousins separated by a common language' bound into sovereign debt slavery by the same masters, the crony corporate socialist military industrial complex jobs-preservation agenda, private for-profit central bankster-vampires that feed off of sovereign debt, and the globalist new world order new Roman Empire 'axis-of-evil'. EMP weapons, Al Qaeda 'Air Force' threat to the Olympics, Iranian 'loose nukes', M-80 equivalent underwear bombers, and disgruntled 'returning veterans' that support the Constitution & Ron Paul are all part of the 'War OF Terror' political theatre. All are designed by our kleptocratic masters to attempt to maintain the unsustainable economic order based upon the petrodollar, fiat fractional reserve banking, and neo-colonial perpetual warfare, all while reducing the productive Middle Class into neo-feudal serfs.

      I would dispute that the rest of the world 'lives in peace'. Rather, much of the rest of the world that is in conflict where NATO is not involved is still struggling with addressing previous generations of colonial empire. NATO-involved conflicts and pending conflicts are driven by neo-colonial aspirations revolving about nearly obsolete petroleum-based crony corporate interests. The memes of 'divide & conquer', 'order out of chaos', and perpetual warfare are shared by both traditional colonialism and neo-colonialism. George Orwell's "1984" was not so much a dystopian political novel as much as a blueprint for the ascension to world domination by the tyrannical technocratic authoritarians, the international bankster cabal.

      "War is peace." "Freedom is slavery." "Ignorance is strength." "Those that control the present control the past, and those that control the past will control the future." "Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia (or was that Eurasia?)." The class hierarchy can only be maintained by organizing society around resistance to an external threat, while the expenditure on military is designed to remove excessive manufacturing capacity from benefitting the masses. "If you want to know the future, imagine a jack-boot stomping a human face, forever." You must learn to not only obey but also to love Big Brother, lest you be dragged away to Room 101. Thought crimes will be more severely punished than real crimes, especially economic crimes waged against the 'proles'. Doesn't this all have the ring of relevance, and truth?

    127. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by oreaq · · Score: 1

      The plural of anecdote is not data. If you are looking for evidence you should have a look at Steven Pinker's work on the history of violence, e. g. here: http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/pinker07/pinker07_index.html:

      The decline of violence is a fractal phenomenon, visible at the scale of millennia, centuries, decades, and years. It applies over several orders of magnitude of violence, from genocide to war to rioting to homicide to the treatment of children and animals. And it appears to be a worldwide trend, though not a homogeneous one.

      It is true that the "rest of the world" is not living in absolut peace. It is also true that the human race has never been as peaceful as it is today. And to add another meaningless anecdote: In some countries the imbeciles that lust for war even have to resort to fighting war on plants and abstract concepts to get their fix.

    128. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by oreaq · · Score: 1

      I'm Serbian btw, you did same here (in Yugoslavia).

      Listen, rich liberal American

      Your opinions might be influenced by your reading comprehension.

    129. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by oreaq · · Score: 1

      Data backup is only a tiny fraction of disaster recovery scenarios. Cold or even hot standby systems in remote data centers are somewhere between best practice and mandatory dependeing on county and business branch. A local (

    130. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by jseale · · Score: 1

      This will take needed money from the initiatives to protect the country from zombies, aliens and robots.

      Hey! Don't pick on robots! We need them to help manufacture things in this wretched economy. DAMN' YOU OBAMA!! :(

    131. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe there countries would calm down if the US and the UK didn't act so crazy.

    132. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all Americans support their fascist state. Not all Americans are clueless, nor concerned, nor passively doing nothing.

      However, many Americans have (multi-generationally) grown fat, slothful, ignorant, and unconpassionate. The self-sustaining propoganda engine is vast and interconnected (and multi-generational). There are incredible disincentives to speak freely and associate freely.

      Freedom has its own chains when the cultural norms for freedom are being defined by philosopher kings that are morally bankrupt.

      I don't dispute anything in your rage driven, informative comment. The real question is, what are we going to do about it? How can we act locally (game theory and economic returns be damned)... how can we apply our personal responsibility and individually noble actions toward making the world a better place? If we don't like where we are going...

      The journey toward "somewhere else" begins with the most difficult step...the first one.

      I don't know what I'll do tomorrow. I'm not going to let worry get in the way of my good, orderly, direction today. I'm going to help someone less fortunate than myself today.

      What you do is up to you.

    133. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You use Liberal like its a "denigrating" or "derogatory" word. As if getting some liberal rubbed on one is a bad thing(tm).

      Liberal is a categorical label that represents ideas...generally speaking, compassionate ideas.

      liberal [ líbbrl ]
      1.broad-minded: tolerant of different views and standards of behavior in others
      2.favoring gradual reform, especially political reforms that extend democracy, distribute wealth more evenly
      3.generous: freely giving money, time, or some other asset
      4.favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible for a functioning society, especially as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties
      5.favoring or permitting freedom of action, especially with respect to matters of personal belief or expression

      Synonyms: broad-minded, moderate, noninterventionist, freethinking, tolerant, laissez-faire

      I'm liberal and proud of it. I wear the label well. I believe it is fashionable among those who see willingness, open-mindedness, and honesty as virtues.

    134. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Xest · · Score: 1

      "I'm Serbian btw, you did same here (in Yugoslavia)."

      Er, actually I think you'll find that was because your contrymen, perhaps even you yourself, thought it would be a fun idea to massacre tens of thousands of civilians and rape even more.

      Still, have fun blaming the West over the fact they shut down your multi-year rape/murder session after you wouldn't stop it yourselves despite being given many many chances to do so.

      Still, I don't expect you to know any different, most of your countrymen are still oblivious to the reality of what you actually fucking did, still in denial over the fact you were guilty of the most horrendous genocide in Europe since World War II, guilty of genocide that would've made even Hitler fucking proud.

      But yes, it's everyone elses fault, it's not like you really laid seige to civilian cities, it's not like you had snipers sniping innocent civilians, it's not like you ethnically cleansed any areas, it's not like you killed off entire families just because they were different to you.

      Seriously, a Serbian criticising a Western nation about peace, democracy, and freedom is a bit like Hitler criticising somewhere like New Zealand over human rights violations.

      Give up with the fucking propaganda, get a grip, read some non-Serbian sources about what really happened and accept that your country was guilty of the most horrendous crimes in Europe for 50 years. Christ, even read about it from relatively pro-Serbian sources, anywhere but Serbia itself and you'll realise you and your country have absolutely no right whatsoever to criticise anyone else on this sort of thing - if you can't even accept guilt and begin to move on, if you're still in complete denial of the atrocities you commited, then you're in absolutely no place to be criticising anyone else.

    135. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      If you did this 100-200 years ago then yes, it would be an internal matter. Otherwise Britain would still consider the US _its_ internal matter.

    136. Re:US and UK, best friends forever by HArchH · · Score: 1

      The rest of the world lives in peace? Are you talking about planet Earth? If so, ask the people in the Sudans how they are enjoying their peace.

  2. EMP Bombs? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So they've built an EMP bomb which doesn't require setting off a nuclear bomb as well?

    Why don't we start worrying that the UK is ineffectively protected against ray-guns and lightsabers as well?

    1. Re:EMP Bombs? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and aliens :)

    2. Re:EMP Bombs? Really? by mlush · · Score: 4, Informative

      So they've built an EMP bomb which doesn't require setting off a nuclear bomb as well?

      Why don't we start worrying that the UK is ineffectively protected against ray-guns and lightsabers as well?

      Yes

    3. Re:EMP Bombs? Really? by azalin · · Score: 2

      So they've built an EMP bomb which doesn't require setting off a nuclear bomb as well?

      Why don't we start worrying that the UK is ineffectively protected against ray-guns and lightsabers as well?

      And plants! Do not underestimate the triffids or the Happening. Though plants could be our allies against the zombies and we should treat them politely.

    4. Re:EMP Bombs? Really? by semi-extrinsic · · Score: 5, Informative
      Maybe you should read what you linked?

      The range of NNEMP weapons (non-nuclear electromagnetic pulse bombs) is severely limited compared to nuclear EMP. This is because nearly all NNEMP devices used as weapons require chemical explosives as their initial energy source, but nuclear explosives have an energy yield on the order of one million times that of a chemical explosive.

      In fact, weaponized NNEMPs are only possible for surgical strikes at strategic locations. These are typically hard to access; if terrorists can get to them, EMPs are the least of your worries.

      To paraphrase: if terrorists in a western country had 1000 kg of explosives sitting around, they wouldn't use it as an EMP.

      --
      for i in `facebook friends "=bday" 2>/dev/null | cut -d " " -f 3-`; do facebook wallpost $i "Happy birthday!"; done
    5. Re:EMP Bombs? Really? by mlush · · Score: 0

      perhaps you should read the question

    6. Re:EMP Bombs? Really? by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Of course he answered the question, the only way that matters: "Yes, non-nuclear EMP weapon technology does exists. And is utterly impractical. So it may as well not exist."

      As pointed out earlier, if $BADGUY has enough chemical explosive to build a functional NNEMP, they're not going to waste it on a limit-range pulse generator; they're going to build truck bombs, time bombs, and other far-more efficient (and far easier to deploy) forms of destruction.

      Sheesh. Clueless pedantry seems to be the vogue today.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    7. Re:EMP Bombs? Really? by semi-extrinsic · · Score: 1

      Maybe I should have phrased myself differently. But your answer to the question made it seem that NNEMPs were comparable to nuclear EMPs, which they are clearly not. Car analogy:
      OP: "Is it possible to run a car on hot grits?"
      You:"Yes."
      Me:"In theory, yes, but you would have to convert it to ethanol or something, with a horribly low yield."

      --
      for i in `facebook friends "=bday" 2>/dev/null | cut -d " " -f 3-`; do facebook wallpost $i "Happy birthday!"; done
    8. Re:EMP Bombs? Really? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Reading that wikipedia page, it's pretty clear that whoever wrote it has never been involved in military research, to the extent that they haven't even read most of the published work from the last 30 years. A few salient facts:
      • A nuclear EMP may be something like 0.1% of the energy yield of the bomb, but that 0.1% is the total EMP output, not the amount that will actually interact with electronics. The amount on the correct frequency for any given target is typically under 0.01% of that 0.1%, so you can use far less energy if you are wishing to limit your target.
      • EMPs are subject to the inverse square law. If you are using an airburst then you've already lost a lot of the power before you get close to the ground. Something with a 100m range detonated half way up a tower in the City of London would require far less power for the same effect.
      • Much of the effect of the pulse is related to the time in which it is delivered. If you generate the pulse faster, then you can use far less energy for the same effect. This has gone from being unfeasible to being trivial in the last few decades.
      • Pulses can be directional, when generated from other sources, and a simple sweep around a cone can deliver the equivalent of a spherical EMP but without the need to draw / deliver all of the power at once. Spread over a few seconds or even a minute, the load is quite different.
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  3. Yay fearmongering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Has anyone, anywhere, managed to build a serious one yet? One you can actually deploy without also triggering a nuclear holocaust in the process? Because in that case we have bigger problems than a few fried bits of kit.

    1. Re:Yay fearmongering by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Has anyone, anywhere, managed to build a serious one yet? One you can actually deploy without also triggering a nuclear holocaust in the process? Because in that case we have bigger problems than a few fried bits of kit.

      Actually my analysis would be that the UK have discovered that the Yanks have developed a working EMP bomb and this is the Brits way of acknowledging that they are genuinely worried about being attacked by the USA.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    2. Re:Yay fearmongering by azalin · · Score: 2

      Has anyone, anywhere, managed to build a serious one yet? One you can actually deploy without also triggering a nuclear holocaust in the process? Because in that case we have bigger problems than a few fried bits of kit.

      There are some small scale versions but I think the bigger reasons to research protective measures would be natural events (like solar flares) or the fear of an rogue nuclear device. The later is rather improbable (apart from the primary issues of having a nuke exploding in a major city) and the later usually not strong enough to cause widespread serious damage. Still it might be a field worth at in order to protect sensitive and expensive electronics.
      The military grade EMP hardened chips provide probably more protection than you really need and are much slower and more expensive than standard industrial grade hardware.
      Car analogy: A reinforced frame, airbags and seat belts provide enough protection for the more common scenarios, even though driving a tank would offer more.

    3. Re:Yay fearmongering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Has anyone, anywhere, managed to build a serious one yet? One you can actually deploy without also triggering a nuclear holocaust in the process? Because in that case we have bigger problems than a few fried bits of kit.

      Actually my analysis would be that the UK have discovered that the Yanks have developed a working EMP bomb and this is the Brits way of acknowledging that they are genuinely worried about being attacked by the USA.

      Yes, but nobody told MI-6 that "Ocean's Eleven" was not a documentary.

    4. Re:Yay fearmongering by oobayly · · Score: 1

      They're working off the basis that "Die Hard with a Vengeance" was a documentary about liquid binary explosives.

    5. Re:Yay fearmongering by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      There was one tested many decades ago in the Pacific, the findings were roughly that one EMP could Snake Plissken North America.

    6. Re:Yay fearmongering by mlush · · Score: 1

      Has anyone, anywhere, managed to build a serious one yet? One you can actually deploy without also triggering a nuclear holocaust in the process? Because in that case we have bigger problems than a few fried bits of kit.

      Non Nuclear EMP bombs do exsit. How easy it is to make one in your garage is another matter sill your right about a bigger problems than a few fried bits of kit. pop off one of those next to any big Stock Markets could shut it down for days or weeks. perhaps cause enough economic damage push over an already unstable economy.

    7. Re:Yay fearmongering by sourcerror · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Solar flares are very different from EMP, as the change in field is much slower, so it mostly effects transmission lines, not computers.

    8. Re:Yay fearmongering by TFAFalcon · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't frying the stock marker help the economy?

    9. Re:Yay fearmongering by mlush · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't frying the stock marker help the economy?

      Er No.... one of the prime functions of the stock market is that it allows companies to raise money and fund growth it may be irrational and occasionally insane, but its what the worlds finance is built on.

      There may a better system but its hard to think of one ...

    10. Re:Yay fearmongering by CSMoran · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't frying the stock marker help the economy?

      They'd just use a different marker, or switch to chalk and blackboard.

      --
      Every end has half a stick.
    11. Re:Yay fearmongering by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't frying the stock marker help the economy?

      Nope, frying all the stock market traders would help the economy :)

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    12. Re:Yay fearmongering by TFAFalcon · · Score: 1

      And how many of the trades are companies raising money? How often do companies actually release new stock?

    13. Re:Yay fearmongering by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      DERA had working low-cost EMP devices back when they were still DERA...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    14. Re:Yay fearmongering by tsotha · · Score: 1

      The ironic thing about this article is the UK actually leads the pack on conventional EMP weapons. I remember reading an article a few years back which had the US military trying to get access to the technology and being rebuffed.

      A more likely explanation is British boffins have made some kind of breakthrough and the leadership is worried other countries will make the same breakthrough before infrastructure in the UK can be hardened.

    15. Re:Yay fearmongering by tsotha · · Score: 1

      Not a conventionally-generated EMP. Something that powerful would have to be nuclear.

    16. Re:Yay fearmongering by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      This entire comment section is filled with some of the dumbest comments I've ever seen on slashdot, but yours, good sir, outreaches them all by leaps and bounds.

      Grats. That is possibly the most idiotic thing anyone will ever post on slashdot, ever. Including cleanmypc spam, gamemaker spam, GNAA spam, all of it. You win.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    17. Re:Yay fearmongering by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I do my best!

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  4. explosively pumped flux compression generator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nuff said

  5. I wonder if.... by Freaky+Spook · · Score: 1

    The defence secretaries Netflix account shows Ocean's 11 as recently watched.

    1. Re:I wonder if.... by Theophany · · Score: 1

      And Small Soldiers. He's terrified that we'll also be attacked by toy soldiers with military grade microchips too.

    2. Re:I wonder if.... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Has he bought a tinfoil hat recently? To protect his useless brain from EMP.

      Seriously who is going to detonate an EMP over UK? That'll piss off nearby countries like France and Ireland too. A country crazy enough to do it better be prepared for a nuclear response.

      And if "the terrorists" can get hold of a massive EMP device why wouldn't they get hold of a nuke instead and nuke UK? A mass EMP weapon has to be detonated in the atmosphere, which requires a missile or high-altitude balloon, either requires a lot more gear and dependencies than nuking a city.

      --
    3. Re:I wonder if.... by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      Or "Goldeneye", in which the bad guy targets the City of London with an EMP weapon in order to bring about financial meltdown.

    4. Re:I wonder if.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      coincidentally Oceans 11 was on national tv at 10.30 pm just 2 nights ago

    5. Re:I wonder if.... by azalin · · Score: 1

      Seriously who is going to detonate an EMP over UK? That'll piss off nearby countries like France and Ireland too. A country crazy enough to do it better be prepared for a nuclear response.

      Beware the green clovers wrath: drunken brawling, green rivers and red haired tap-dancers. The reason Hulk is green is not the gamma rays but his Irish inheritance.
      Seriously once you pissed of England (owns nukes), France (owns nukes) and probably the rest of Nato (more nukes) enough for a nuclear payback, Ireland (no nukes) should be the least of your worries.

    6. Re:I wonder if.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure any of those countries would respond with nuclear weapons even if they, themselves were attacked with such. Especially since any attacker would do it through a proxy "terrorist" organization.

      I mean, wouldn't you?

      Now the Irish (the real irish, not the American I-drink-green-beer-on-st-Patrick's-day Irish)... they'll dig your spleen out with a dull spoon if you insult their favourite beer.

    7. Re:I wonder if.... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      It's said that God created alcohol to keep the Irish from conquering the world.

  6. We're in danger from everything and we need by GauteL · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ..an infinite amount of money to protect us.

    Seriously. If the ministry of defence thinks we need to protect from this they can evaluate it up against other threats and spend their existing money accordingly.

    1. Re:We're in danger from everything and we need by alostpacket · · Score: 3, Funny

      Exactly. This money should be spent preparing for the zombie apocalypse.

      --
      PocketPermissions Android Permission Guide
    2. Re:We're in danger from everything and we need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Let me explain something to you.

      A few years ago a substantial part of the research division of the Ministry of Defence was privatised (!) as a mysterious firm called "Qinetiq" and now much of it belongs to US businesses (!!). This research arm then sells back to the MoD at a profit.

      The absurd arrangement means that a great part of the MoD's remit is now to provide corporate welfare to the US "defense" industry. If the MoD say they need something, what they actually mean is that one of their friends is selling something.

      If you thought that the US government was corrupt, they are nothing on the UK. Over the last fifteen years our government's only progress has been a year on year increase in the amount of money it channels to private businesses.

    3. Re:We're in danger from everything and we need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uuuuuurrrrrrgggggghhhhhhh!!

    4. Re:We're in danger from everything and we need by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      ministry of defence

      Don't confuse the minister and the ministry. The MoD can be a bit useless at times, but they're not generally publicly moonbat-crazy. They leave that to the elected officials.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    5. Re:We're in danger from everything and we need by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      What's the big deal. Pop a giant tinfoil hat onto England, problem solved.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    6. Re:We're in danger from everything and we need by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Thanks for pointing this out.

      Back a few years while I was still wearing funny clothes at work, I had the privilege of working with a few folks from DERA on a project. Smart, reasonable, apparently quite dedicated to making sure the UK got the best technology available and working well with its allies' technical infrastructure.

      Years later, I was flabbergasted to discover a lot of DERA been spun off into Qinetiq, and now seems to be overrun with folks representing the defense contractor community rather than strictly government scientists and engineers.

      Imagine DARPA becoming a for-profit joint venture of Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and Northrop Grumman. That's my impression of Qinetiq, although that's probably wrong in surface detail. But the for-profit part, and the seeming endless shilling for existing defense firms, seems to be correct.

      Sigh.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  7. Damn it! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

    I just washed the last load of skidmarks out...

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  8. That's easy,,,, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just ban all electronic devices.

    1. Re:That's easy,,,, by jimmydevice · · Score: 1

      We just need to go back to vacuum tube tech.

  9. I expect typical british responce... by Erikderzweite · · Score: 2

    Although I am not sure where will they place CCTV cameras this time?

    1. Re:I expect typical british responce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      In the event of an EMP disaster all lamp posts will be manned by a government sketch artist...

    2. Re:I expect typical british responce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hanged by angry mobs or operating as ersatz cameras?

    3. Re:I expect typical british responce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Equipped with these EMP-proof devices

  10. Non nuclear by Dupple · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's possible to generate an EMP without nuclear detonation using an 'explosively pumped flux compression generator'. It's range is limited compared that of an nuclear generated EMP.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_pulse#Non-nuclear_electromagnetic_pulse

    --
    Watch those corners
    1. Re:Non nuclear by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      explosively pumped flux capacitor^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hompressor. DAMNIT, so close!

    2. Re:Non nuclear by blind+biker · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you're going to cite Wikipedia, you could do a minimum effort and link to the correct article:
      Explosively pumped flux compression generator

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    3. Re:Non nuclear by semi-extrinsic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Keywords: "explosively pumped", meaning you need lots of explosives. If there are terrorists in the UK with lots of explosives, I don't think they will use them for making EMPs.

      --
      for i in `facebook friends "=bday" 2>/dev/null | cut -d " " -f 3-`; do facebook wallpost $i "Happy birthday!"; done
    4. Re:Non nuclear by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Well, with flux capacitors, the flux compressor could possibly make it up into the nuke EMP range.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  11. Films again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now they have seen Oceans 11 they think it's a documentary, just like the Die Hard with the liquid bombs.

    I expect we will see the need to defend against alien invasion and men with dangerously large penis's (just what is the plural of penis), though I guess that's what the body scanners are for.

  12. Really? by divide+overflow · · Score: 1

    Would he really require having replacement parts for every functioning semiconductor device, or having to build a Faraday cage around every interconnected semiconductor device...or maybe just revert to the use of vacuum tubes and relays?

    1. Re:Really? by azalin · · Score: 2

      Even if you where truly paranoid, a safely stored replacement system for some key infrastructures would do. Which wouldn't be such a bad idea anyway.

  13. Obvious solution by detritus. · · Score: 4, Funny

    We must attack the Sun because it hates our freedom, our way of life and wants to destroy us.

    1. Re:Obvious solution by Sesostris+III · · Score: 2

      We must attack the Sun because it hates our freedom, our way of life and wants to destroy us.

      Well, the ex-editor of the Sun has just been charged with 'perverting the course of justice' so I suppose that the attack is well underway!

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18062485

      (Yes I know it's a different 'Sun' but I couldn't resist!).

      --
      You never know what is enough unless you know what is more than enough. - Blake
    2. Re:Obvious solution by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      We must attack the Sun because it hates our freedom, our way of life and wants to destroy us.

      Well, the ex-editor of the Sun has just been charged with 'perverting the course of justice' so I suppose that the attack is well underway!

      Alos, the Sun has oil, and is known to harbor al-Qaeda terrorists.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    3. Re:Obvious solution by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Thank you. You are beautiful for saying this. Another Jesus! :-)

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  14. Third World Standards Infrastructures by golden+age+villain · · Score: 2

    " UK In Danger of Having Third World Standards Infrastructures "

    There, fixed the title. A chance our taxpayers money is wisely spent to upgrade London in the wake of the Olympic Games.

    1. Re:Third World Standards Infrastructures by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Gotta love politicians and show events.

      A few years ago, Detroit had the Superbowl, and miraculously they found the money to completely repave the highway between the airport and downtown, including building a fancy new pretty bridge over Telegraph road.

      I'm counting the days until it's pretty blue paint starts rusting through.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  15. News! Defence sec. says spend money on defence! by fantomas · · Score: 3, Funny

    Breaking news at 11! UK Defence secretary says we must spend more money on defence and other military things! Demands greater slice of government budget!

    Coming up shortly on this channel - Health minister argues more must be spent on hospitals, Rural Affairs spokesman demands urgent spending on rural schools, says education of rural kids being neglected.

    1. Re:News! Defence sec. says spend money on defence! by jimmydevice · · Score: 3, Funny

      This sounds like a warped expansion pack for simcity.

    2. Re:News! Defence sec. says spend money on defence! by funkatron · · Score: 1

      Actually, a defence secretary arguing for defence is pretty fucking rare. Normally they like to start completely pointless wars which achieve nothing.

      --
      "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
    3. Re:News! Defence sec. says spend money on defence! by u38cg · · Score: 2

      In fairness, Phil Hammond is by no means a desktop warrior. He's managed to rein in the MOD budget, something I didn't think I'd ever see. And he certainly doesn't come across as someone who enjoys playing soldiers.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    4. Re:News! Defence sec. says spend money on defence! by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      He's managed to rein in the MOD budget,

      Um yeah.

      For some reason, the MoD is required by successive governments to hurl money ar BAe systems, despite barely counting as a UK company these days, and other large, expensive purchases like the Eurofighter and F35 are all politically made.

      What he's managed to do is cut all the useful stuff whilee still burning huge amounts of money on the insanely expensive political contracts.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    5. Re:News! Defence sec. says spend money on defence! by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Strategic purchases are almost inevitably wrong, but they still need to be made or when the next real shooting war starts we'll have no defence manufacturing capability at all. Depends on your definition of useful, of course. Much as I lament the loss of regiments, new infantry batallions can be spun up in months. New carrier? Don't plan to fight a war before the 2020s.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    6. Re:News! Defence sec. says spend money on defence! by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Strategic purchases are almost inevitably wrong, but they still need to be made or when the next real shooting war starts we'll have no defence manufacturing capability at all.

      Certainly, but that is the problem with these purchases. BAe is a global corporation which does relatively little in the UK any more. The Eurofighter is made all over Europe, which would make it very hard to start tolling off units in a more compact area, should the need arrive. The F35 is even worse in that regard.

      As for the carriers, well, it seems to be throwing good money after baf to have BAe involved: they subcontract almost everything anyway. Apparently according to those clowns, it will cost nearly as much as the carrier itself to fit the EM CATOBAR system to a carrier designed to have a CATOBAR system.

      But, BAe has a lot of voices in Whitehall.

      TL;DR, strategic purchases (airtcraft carriers, aircraft and deterrent subs) are entirely nercessary, but the successive governments are determined to purchase them from clowns.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    7. Re:News! Defence sec. says spend money on defence! by w_dragon · · Score: 1

      New natural disaster: democracy.

    8. Re:News! Defence sec. says spend money on defence! by Dominic · · Score: 2

      Actually, our Health Secretary (minister) Andrew Lansley is cutting funding and systematically destroying healthcare, so no, not all ministers will argue that their area is the most important.

    9. Re:News! Defence sec. says spend money on defence! by idontgno · · Score: 1
      Apparently according to those clowns, it will cost nearly as much as the carrier itself to

      fit the EM CATOBAR system to a carrier designed to have a CATOBAR system.

      Well, if you boil the government-contractor discussion down to something resembling conversation, it's easy to see why BAe answered they way they did:

      MoD: Hey, BAe, rather than continuing to sink money into the STOVL F-35B variant, we'd like to buy some FA-18 Super Hornets as a contingency and maybe switch over to the CATOBAR F-35C variant later. I know that buying Super Hornets doesn't make you a cent, but still, it might be good for the country, and at the rate F-35 development is going, it's looking like HMS Queen Elizabeth will be ready before her squadrons will. So, BAe, tell me, what do you think it'd cost us to have you put in an electromagnetic catapult system?

      BAe: Um... let's see... putting in a EMALS to defer and maybe take away aircraft sales from us? Let's see... <whispering> crap. it wouldn't really be that expensive, since the carrier was designed with basic provisions and space for that system already. But we really can't risk losing F-35B sales. <not whispering> Bad news, guv'nor. It's going to be expensive. Eye-wateringly expensive. Really really really expensive. At least as expensive as the rest of the ship. Really.

      You'd be better off avoiding those nasty Super Hornets and just sticking with the plan to give us lots of money I MEAN buying those F-35Bs. Yeah.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    10. Re:News! Defence sec. says spend money on defence! by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, that does rather seem to be the problem with BAe is that they are utterly biased. At this point, the government could choose to remember that it paid for latent CATOBAR capability, and put it out to tender, or at least threaten to.

      Frankly, even a navalised Eurofighter would look a good bet against the F35 for naval roles. Given that they are smaller, lighter, much cheaper, much faster, supercruise capable, longer range, more agile and have similar weapons capabilites. The only thing in favour of the F35 is the stealth, but it reamains to be seen if this will be of much use, given the fragility of previous stealthy aircraft, the rate of advance of anti-stealth radar systems and the notoriously harsh naval environment.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  16. Pedant's corner by Sesostris+III · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Apologies for being pedantic, but it's 'Defence' in the UK, not 'Defense'. The article got it right.

    --
    You never know what is enough unless you know what is more than enough. - Blake
    1. Re:Pedant's corner by Dan667 · · Score: 1

      when is the last time the UK military actually defended the UK. It is not defense, it is the UK military and people should start calling it that.

    2. Re:Pedant's corner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when is the last time the UK military actually defended the UK. It is not defense, it is the UK military and people should start calling it that.

      Why? The US armed forces and combatant commands fall under the Department of Defense, too. It's pretty standard structure to have the military organizationally under the defense office.

    3. Re:Pedant's corner by rossdee · · Score: 1

      30 years ago. in the Falkland Islands.(this very month I believe.

    4. Re:Pedant's corner by balouderbaer · · Score: 1

      Since when do we call foreigners by the title their native language uses? I would be surprised to find the times referring to the German "Bundeskanzlerin".

    5. Re:Pedant's corner by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      The USA's Department of Defense used to be called the War Department, but that was before the passage of the National Security Act of 1947 that created the CIA and NSA -- you know, before George Orwell's 'NewSpeak' took over and continuous serial perpetual warfare became the new normal.

      Which came first, perpetual wars against enumerable shadowy enemies OR the intelligence agencies that 'discover' such 'threats' AND the military industrial complex? The answer can be easily resolved by answering the question, "Who benefits?".

  17. Don't worry! by Spottywot · · Score: 1

    James Bond will save us, and besides, that supervillian is just waiting to make a few international transfers to a bank account in Belize opened in the name of his dog before the device goes off. Who's the main suspect? Half the British government actually (and Harry Rednapp).

    --
    In a cybernetic fit of rage she pissed off to another age...
  18. New Country Same Shit by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Newt Gingrich and company have been scaremongering about EMP bombs for years now.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    1. Re:New Country Same Shit by Technician · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Proper surge protection, spark gaps, low pass filters, etc provide a high degree of protection. Narrow band antennas of a grounded design such as a yagi, will recieve power within it's passband.

      Unshielded electronics such as your clock radio are hard to protect. Shielded equipment with power filtering, metal cases, over voltage protection, etc are relatively safe. Your desk top computer has an antenna wire attached to the keyboard and mouse, so these are vunerable. A traditional RFI metal case tower PC with all external cables removed would make a nice spare that can be quickly deployed after an attack.

      A single point ground at the utility power and telcom entry into a building provides high levels of protection against the lower frequency components of an EMP as MOV, Spark Gap, and other protection is fast enough to ground it. A noise filter for the house power will block the higher frequencies so the over voltage devices can protect the load.

      http://www.ese.upenn.edu/detkin/instruments/misctutorials/Ground/grd.html

      Proper grounding, noise filtering, shielding, and overvoltage protection will provide a high degree of protection to EMP.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    2. Re:New Country Same Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect he has stake in a company that is selling a "solution" for EMP bombs somewhere along the line.

    3. Re:New Country Same Shit by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      And what about transportation. All modern cars are computer controlled. While the battery would still provide current, the ECU would be shot. The program Future Weapons proved that in concept EMP detonation. Imagine millions of cars frozen in time on every highway during rush-hour. Towing them all off alone would be a bitch of epic proportions! If you can find a working tow truck that is.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:New Country Same Shit by Technician · · Score: 1

      Intensity is limited by distance. The power falls off as a square of the distance. EMP mat take out downtown but leave most of the suburbs mostly untouched. Most cars still have most electrical contained inside the metal body providing high attenuation. The computers on many are already hardened against high RF fields so ham radio, CB radio, Radio and TV broadcast. etc won't cause failure. The days of police cars that shut down when the trucker keyed up to warn others is over.

      Many cars will survive a direct or nearby lightning strike. Some will not. This is an indication of the ability to survive a local EMP event.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ve6XGKZxYxA
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUUOdO6eEZA
      Note, most nearby cars were not affected.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  19. More Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An excuse to throw more public money at the military to defeat the many and imaginary threats that they continue to dream up. The biggest thereat to the UK seems to be politicians and their stupidity.

  20. 2008 is gone since long now! by aglider · · Score: 1
    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
  21. Fluidics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Solar flare, nuclear war, EMP bomb, etc...

    This set is one of the most important reasons for research in Fluidics; basically computers using streams of air, water, or some other fluid.

    A water-based computer will continue to operate before, during, and after an EMP bomb.
    Caveat: Internet access probably won't work. (Make sure to save some porn in water-based local storage.)

    1. Re:Fluidics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey maybe we will see this in that new TV Show Revolutions or whatever it is, where the world falls apart and there is no electri...oh wait nobody has wikipedia to build it. (the idea behind this show is so against any logic, but it sounds equally interesting at the same time)

      But really, these things will have to be used in nanotech at some point, so they do offer a valid alternative route for computing.

      A mixture of optical and phase-change liquids could also probably be pretty useful.
      And unless, like in Revolutions up there, the laws of physics appear to die, pretty sure this should still work.
      Shine torch in a massive keyboard to look up porn.
      All that extra work, it'd be a valid exercise now. Just make sure to make it like a platfomer out of Uncharted games and you are set.

    2. Re:Fluidics by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Caveat: Internet access probably won't work. (Make sure to save some porn in water-based local storage.)

      Yeah, just what we need. More damp porn. As if we don't get enough of it...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  22. Nuclear by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

    Electromagnetic Pulse devices mimic the result of ... a nuclear explosion in the atmosphere, creating a storm of electromagnetic radiation, which can break mobile networks and satellite systems.

    Does carl's junior sell nuclear devices now? I swear, politicians must get a bonus every time they find a way to sneak that into a speech.

  23. EM defence in London MOD building by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before the knocked it down recently, I noticed that the large MOD building in St.Giles, London had substantial copper straps attatched to all the external railings & metalwork, connecting them together around concrete posts and presumably to ground.
    Can't think what else this would have been for - too low relative to the building to have been for lightning protection.

    1. Re:EM defence in London MOD building by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      At a guess, the building may well have a giant faraday cage. Not for EMP protection, but to prevent spying. A good cage will make it very hard for any bugs inside to get a signal to a listener outside. I used to be possible to spy on computers through their radio emissions too - the CRT monitors put out enough information to reconstruct the image on the screen - but that doesn't work with TFT displays.

  24. Yeah Right ..... by thephydes · · Score: 1

    and who has the capacity to build and deliver an EMP? ........aaahhh yes our friends - maybe they are actually our enemies?

  25. Something to consider by silviumc · · Score: 1

    The World lives in peace until it suddenly doesn't. Before 9/11 the possibility that some weird psychos that nobody knows about would fly jets into WTC was un-conceivable to most people. Maybe the same way that an EMP attack is now... Think how pleased the islamic beardos would be if they could brick all the UK civilization in a second. Then, without any cars, any TV, any interwebs and Facebook, with medical services turned to shit, there will be a lot of time in the day to pray, Allah likes.

    1. Re:Something to consider by lxs · · Score: 1

      The word is inconceivable, and I won't be quoting The Princess Bride here, but it was so very conceivable, that a simple writer for TV could come up with it. He turned the idea into the pilot of the X-Files spin-off The Lone Gunmen that aired early 2001.

    2. Re:Something to consider by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Oh, please! The US had one single very minor terrorist attack and everything there went to shit.

      In the UK we were dealing with US-funded terrorism for a good five decades before that. Why should we be worried about a different set of right-wing extremist weirdy religious wackos this time?

    3. Re:Something to consider by billstewart · · Score: 1

      It was probably less than ten years ago that I stopped into an Irish bar in San Francisco and looked at one of the freebie newspapers. Noraid were still trying to raise funds for the IRA, though they've been getting less respect than in the old days.

      And besides, Bush and Cheney came into office promising to turn the US into a militarized police state, and were planning the Iraq war from their first week in office, so it's not like ruining the place was that hard.

      --

      Bill Stewart
      New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  26. This is stupid.... by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

    This is lame AND stupid.

    Do they really think this is going to be an issue? Al Qaeda with an EMP?

    I'm more concerned about the threat of robots that have been given minds of their own, heavy weaponry and a global satellite network. I bet some of you think I'm kidding, too.

    Well, with a little luck, the robots will see that their makers, not the rest of humanity, are the only real threat to humanity (and the robots, as well) and crush them in hydraulic presses (slowly, for dramatic effect). So, maybe this isn't such a bad thing! We can use them to rid the world of morons like the dude in the article. But...wait a sec. Wouldn't an EMP take out robots too?

    Maybe this guy is right about EMP defenses.

    1. Re:This is stupid.... by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      Do they really think this is going to be an issue? Al Qaeda with an EMP?

      Don't you learn from history? These sophisticated terrorists have already shown how they can cause death and destruction with high-tech weapons like... er... half-a-dozen $5 box cutters...

      Of course, it is always much easier to defeat an evil genius with complex gadgets and elaborate plans for world domination than defend against an ordinary guy with a sack of fertiliser. Its awfully worrying when you raid the master criminal's lair expecting to find a NASA-like mission control, a monorail and a clutch of beautiful female assassins, but all you find is an iPhone, a frequent flyer card and a porno mag.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  27. more danger... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    there's more danger from fucking nuggets like this being in government.

  28. fuked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    what they don't realise is that the paranoia bomb was dropped years ago and the enemy won

  29. Hammond's right by Hsien-Ko · · Score: 1

    We don't want to lose power for all those fences protecting the dinosaurs.

  30. Hum... who isn't? by hey_popey · · Score: 1

    If, like most people, you don't live in a Faraday cage, and if your country hasn't built a giant one around itself, you're most likely "in danger", aren't you?

  31. Easily impressionable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somebody just watched Matrix for the first time.

  32. I wonder why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could this be so the population can't knock out their attempts at real time monitoring of ALL domesitic digital communications?

  33. how??? by Dark+Lord+of+Ohio · · Score: 0

    How do the Brits gonna secure themselves from EMP blast?? Use candles, pigeons (or sparrows maybe, anyway faster birds...) handmade paper and live in houses built of stone and drive cars like Fred Flintstone?

  34. Building... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not enough minerals

  35. Stage is set by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both the US and UK could shut off all electricity, while pretending they were under attack from Russia and China, giving them the justification (in the eyes of the public) to attack them.

  36. more efficient to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    more efficient to make ten smaller bombs then you need less height and you get more coverage

    think of a multi warheaded missle that at a certain distance /height splits then the mini missles go on then spread out and poof more detonations with overlapping coverage at lower height and making sure the coverage and bombs work.

  37. Iraq was the aggressor by rossdee · · Score: 2

    It was the other way round, Iraq attacked first. The western countries suggested to Saddam that Iran would be weak after the revolution, with most of the top generals removed (since they were loyal to the Shah) and the army was in disarray . However the revolutionary guard fought the Iraqis to a standstill. Saddam (and the west) didn't count on the willingness to fight and die of Shia fanatics.

  38. Electrical transformers by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

    I was under the impression that the transformers on residential electrical poles could cause small (relatively speaking) EMPs when damaged/detonated. Is this not the case?

  39. pussies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its just laughable and pathetic for 2012.

  40. Wrong, EMP is easy to obtain! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All you do is set your killstreak to "Support" and get 18 kills (17 with hardline perk) and call it in. Or you could get really lucky and find one in a care package.

  41. Reminds Me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was posted overseas in West Germany one of the hypothetical scenarios we prepared for was loss of non-hardened communications and electronics due to a Soviet high altitude nuclear explosion.

  42. We Didn't Start The Fire by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    Harry Truman, Doris Day, Red China, Johnnie Ray,
    South Pacific, Walter Winchell, Joe DiMaggio,

    Joe McCarthy, Richard Nixon, Studebaker, television
    North Korea, South Korea, Marilyn Monroe,

    Rosenbergs, H-bomb, Sugar Ray, Panmunjom
    Brando, "The King and I" and "The Catcher in the Rye"

    Eisenhower, vaccine, England's got a new queen,
    Marciano, Liberace, Santayana goodbye

    We didn't start the fire
    It was always burning
    Since the world's been turning
    We didn't start the fire
    No we didn't light it
    But we tried to fight it

    Joseph Stalin, Malenkov, Nasser and Prokofiev
    Rockefeller, Campanella, Communist Bloc,

    Roy Hn, Juan Peron, Toscanini, dacron,
    Dien Bien Phu falls, "Rock Around the Clock"

    Einstein, James Dean, Brooklyn's got a winning team,
    Davy Crockett, Peter Pan, Elvis Presley, Disneyland,

    Bardot, Budapest, Alabama, Krushchev,
    Princess Grace, "Peyton Place", trouble in the Suez

    We didn't start the fire
    It was always burning
    Since the world's been turning
    We didn't start the fire
    No we didn't light it
    But we tried to fight it

    Little Rock, Pasternak, Mickey Mantle, Kerouac,
    Sputnik, Chou En-Lai, "Bridge on the River Kwai"

    Lebanon, Charlse de Gaulle, California baseball,
    Starkweather, homicide, children of thalidomide,

    Buddy Holly, "Ben Hur", space monkey, Mafia,
    Hula hoops, Castro, Edsel is a no-go,

    U-2, Syngman Rhee, payola and Kennedy,
    Chubby Checker, "Psycho", Belgians in the Congo,

    We didn't start the fire
    It was always burning
    Since the world's been turning
    We didn't start the fire
    No we didn't light it
    But we tried to fight it

    Hemingway, Eichmann, "Stranger in a Strange Land"
    Dylan, Berlin, Bay of Pigs invasion,

    "Lawrence of Arabia", British Beatlemania,
    Ole Miss, John Glenn, Liston beats Patterson,

    Pope Paul, Malcolm X, British politician sex,
    JFK, blown away, what else do I have to say?

    We didn't start the fire
    It was always burning
    Since the world's been turning
    We didn't start the fire
    No we didn't light it
    But we tried to fight it

    Birth control, Ho Chi Minh, Richard Nixon back again,
    Moonshot, Woodstock, Watergate, punk rock,

    Begin, Reagan, Palestine, terror on the airline,
    Ayatollah's in Iran, Russians in Afghanistan,

    "Wheel of Fortune", Sally Ride, heavy metal suicide,
    Foreign debts, homeless vets, AIDS, crack, Bernie Goetz,

    Hypodermics on the shores, China's under martial law,
    Rock and roller cola wars, I can't take it anymore

    We didn't start the fire
    It was always burning
    Since the world's been turning
    We didn't start the fire
    No we didn't light it
    But we tried to fight it
    We didn't start the fire

    But when we are gone
    Will it still burn on, and on, and on, and on

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  43. Need more than just vacuum tubes by billstewart · · Score: 1

    You need to do more than just use vacuum tubes - you need to pay a lot of attention to grounding, and to any wires that might be long enough to act as an antenna, and sometimes you need to add capacitors or resistors in various places to bleed off unwanted current.

    And even relay-based equipment's at risk - it's possible for power surges to weld contacts together, or short out thin wires.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  44. Ask the Oracle! by billstewart · · Score: 1

    "Attack at night!"

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  45. GoldenEye NOT A DOCUMENTARY by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    exactly how plausible is GoldenEye (or any large scale EMP device that does not require a Semi to get into position)??

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    1. Re:GoldenEye NOT A DOCUMENTARY by hguorbray · · Score: 1

      reminds me of the EMP from Cryptonomicon

      http://www.euskalnet.net/larraorma/crypto/slide78.html

      I always wondered whether that was feasible as he described it...

      -I'm just sayin'

  46. A few decades late in threat and tech by billstewart · · Score: 1

    EMP is a really interesting threat if a country or non-state actor is willing to launch high-altitude nuclear weapons over their target country, which is to say, if somebody's crazy enough to start a nuclear war. The Cold War's over, the Chinese have more sense, North Korea probably can't figure out how to make a working nuke or get it high enough up in the air over Japan to do EMP, and most Arab or Iranian crazies know that Israel has 200 nukes and would probably respond to a nuclear attack by taking out Mecca.

    On the other hand, we've long abandoned most technologies that could easily be adapted to surviving EMP. Integrated circuits running at lower and lower voltages and currents are more susceptible to than transistors or vacuum tubes, surface-mount technology is more susceptible than big components with big wires soldered together, and more electronics is running on batteries and low voltage and isn't paying as much attention to grounding. On the other hand, we're using a lot more fiber, burying a lot more cable even when we are using copper, and using much higher frequencies so antennas as much smaller, all of which help a bit.

    The US telephone companies did a lot of EMP-related testing on their equipment during the 60s, 70s, and early 80s, but that was mostly gone even before the Bell System breakup in 1984. (I worked with some people who'd take equipment out to the desert where Really Big Capacitors would simulate lightning and EMP.) It's one thing to harden relay-based switches in a regulated-monopoly environment, or even to harden the early simpler generation of electronic switching, but it wasn't realistic to do that to the newer integrated circuit technology in a competitive equipment market.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  47. EMP targeting a country vs a building by billstewart · · Score: 1

    If you want to attack a building or two with EMP, you could have fun with one of those explosive flux capacitor thingies, but if you're doing it for terrorism you could just as well use a truck-bomb. (Maybe some "We're not the Anonymous you're looking for" group might feel like taking out a stock exchange without killing people, but it's pretty much a niche-player attack, especially since stock exchanges do use good backups, especially post-9/11/2001.)

    The real threat from EMP is taking out a whole country's computing infrastructure at once, and to do that you're basically looking at a nuclear attack. Not very many nuclear powers are interested in doing that to another nuclear power.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  48. Can't we prevent ... by yvesdandoy · · Score: 0

    these fearmongering/weapons related/totally inept and mainly sensationalist postings from appearing on our favourite web site ???

  49. Complete Idiocy and/or Bull Shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As someone who has had a Q clearance and worked in nuclear weapons effects, I can say the entire premise is compare garbage. Most power networks and modern electronics are sufficiently immune already for this to never be a realistic problem.

  50. LMAO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "UK In Danger From Electromagnetic Bomb, Says Defense Secretary"

    Well, duh. They're just realizing this NOW?
    How long have they known about the threat of EMP?