Slashdot Mirror
Curt Schilling Fires Entire Staff At 38 Studios
redletterdave writes "On Thursday, former Boston Red Sox pitcher and tech entrepreneur Curt Schilling fired his entire staff at 38 Studios, his Rhode Island-based video game company, leaving more than 300 employees without jobs because the company couldn't repay its debt to the state. 38 Studios failed to pay Rhode Island's economic development agency $1.1 million, which was due last week, and also failed to meet payroll for its staff in both its Providence office and its Maryland subsidiary, Big Huge Games."
The company's recent action RPG, Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning, sold 1.2 million copies — which would have been great if they hadn't needed to sell 3 million to break even. An article at Massively goes through some of the lessons the video game industry needs to learn from this situation.
I was hoping this would turn around, I'm tired of hearing stories of companies that take gov't money and fold right quick afterwards. That ugly monument to screwing the taxpayers, SolyndraBuilding, irks me every time I drive by it.
Rich
Lessons learned, like teaming up with EA and day 1 DLC? I doubt developers/companies will learn...
Having played both Skyrim and Kingdoms, I loved the way Kingdoms worked and preferred it over Skyrim and Oblivion. The gameplay was great and the action seamless and fast, being able to switch from ranged to melee to magic and back and forth with the speed that Kingdoms had was amazing. I enjoyed the world, the story, the design, everything.
Hopefully a decent studio will take up the title for future installments, cuz it was a great game.
DEMETRIUS: Villain, what hast thou done?
AARON: Villain, I have done thy mother.
Shakespeare invents 'your mom'
Other estimates are as low as 400,000, with mixed reviews to boot.
I fail to see how he confuses a single player game with an MMO. WTF. His eventual goal may have been an MMO but THIS GAME was a single player action CRPG.
>IOW a copy to one out of ever 100 living Americans?
Hello? There is this place called the rest of the world. It's a place where americans don't live. There are lots of us.
We know you are there. We just don't care.
This post comes with a double-your-money-back guarantee!
Any offense taken to this post is at your sole discretion.
IOW a copy to one out of ever 100 living Americans?
I think I see the problem.
If only they were smart enough to also sell it to non Americans...
the '38 special' memo.
Uh... you realize that the market for video games is a hell of a lot bigger than just the US right?
Diablo 3 had 4.7 million sales *on day 1*. And that's without korean cafes.
Skyrim (which was cross platform) is up around 9 and a half million copies in about a week.
The problem with Kingdoms of Amalur:reckoning is that no one has any fucking clue what an Amalur is, and it's not obvious that is the world they were creating, which immediately turns attention away. And as an RPG it's nothing spectacular, run around do quests. It's decent enough, and well executed, but there's nothing in it that you call your friend and say 'you have to play this game to see this' the way skyrim or fallout has.
No one knows what the fuck skyrim is either, but when you're an established series you can build press and momentum for whatever name you want, and people will go for it. Kingdoms of Amalur may have failed in part because they didn't invest enough in press and marketing, released at the wrong time, etc. But it's certainly not a huge barrier for a game at the production quality they had to sell 3 million copies, especially across all 3 platforms. Granted, it has been out for 3 months and is *still* 60 bucks on steam, so that's not helping either. They'd have been well served to do a sale at say 20 bucks and use it as an experiment to see if they can get more sales. At this point, there's nothing else to lose, so it can't hurt to try.
Meh. No mods. Nuff said.
Schilling news.
ACs can't gain mod points, so... yeah.
Lets say they assumed the time-adjusted price of $39 rather than the opening $60.. That comes to 117 million dollars to _break even_.
Having played the game, which I must profess I did enjoy, I can't see where 117 million dollars went. Most of the dungeons were cut/paste copies with slight modifications, there's probably less than 100 monster models and no multi-user play.
And it took 300 people to produce it?
If you worked for me I'd have fired you too.
The game was headed by former SOE staff... the very people that worked on EQ2 disaster. There was only 1 way this was going to end.
well, one would think that Curt Shilling could man up and pay the state back. But, no, that's not how business people work, usually. Fundamentally, they're just like us peons they like to poop on - "it's someone else's problem".
We know you are there. We just don't care.
And they should be thankful for that. When it comes to foreign countries, we've only got two modes: Apathy and Ass-kicking.
You don't like being ignored? Ok, how about we teach you to know your place? It's ass kicking time.
War of 1812, Vietnam war, Bay of Pigs... shall I continue?
Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
We know you are there. We just don't care.
And they should be thankful for that. When it comes to foreign countries, we've only got two modes: Apathy and Ass-kicking.
You don't like being ignored? Ok, how about we teach you to know your place? It's ass kicking time.
War of 1812, Vietnam war, Bay of Pigs... shall I continue?
Those all fall under apathy.
but on the positive side, it looks like they're hiring! ;)
:/
In light of recent events, I'd advise the site developer to update that page but I'm guessing he or she was just fired
It also didn't help to have single player quests behind a online pass. Fighting with the user-base when you're just beginning is never good.
I don't think the name is an issue. You can tell it's fantasy, and that's all you need to know.
And that was a damned good RPG. Needing 3 million sales to break even is insane ......
"I used to be a developer like you, but then I took a Skyrim to my sales figures."
The people who didn't know what skyrim was found out what it was through the meme, followed by exploisve word of mouth. The game has been on steam's top 10 sales lists for over 6mo now. Which should tell you something, it's not the $60 barrier, it's the quality + mod barrier that killed KoA.
Om, nomnomnom...
>We know you are there. We just don't care.
We really, really, really wish that you didn't
they failed as a company because they had way, way too much staff.
would it really have been that much different with "just" 150 people? don't think so.
oh and an ordered world that wasn't too imaginative. skipped the whole title because of that. they could have lifted their pr right off from wow, didn't seem imaginative.
judging from gameplay videos, you people who compare amalur to skyrim: are you fucking insane? if you have to compare it to something recent compare it to the abortion that was dragon age II or wow - because skyrim, oblivion & morrowind are sandbox virtual 3d world action rpg games with gameplay that goes with it - wow, amalur & dragon age II are mostly 2d hack'n'slash games portrayed with 3d models - apparently not too many people want a nwn-gauntlet hybrid for their xbox, can't blame 'em, not after the abortion that was dragon age II.
but plenty of people wanted skyrim - it's at least different and the world took something else to make than what 38 studios could have made with a staff 10x bigger than what they now had, it took imagination on how to use the tools.
world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
my complaint about the 60 dollar price point is specific to this week. Or I suppose the last 2 weeks. At this point they could have (not necessarily needed to but could have) tried anything possible to generate cash.
And yes, that was point about Skryim, it had enough momentum and a few 'holy shit' moments that really helped.
In practice that's not an issue. Not enough of the user base has any clue what those things are for it to matter to sales. If you have a PS3 or Xbox that it logs you into their onlines services doesn't even warrant a shoulder shrug, and via steam or origin phoning home isn't a shock either.
ANNO 2070 has one of the more obtrusive login to play your single player game setups possible and it seems to manage quite well.
That gladly preaches on behalf of Republican Senator Scott Brown for supposedly smaller government, all the while sticking his greedy hands out for as much government subsidized $$$ as he could muster as a "world series hero"
all government spending is evil in his hypocritical world, unless you're a clown that pissed away $75 million in taxpayer money so he could play video game developer
The US won the War or 1812. Minus having to build a new White House we got everything we wanted at the onset of the war. An end to impressment, shipping rights on the great lakes, the Royal Navy not harassing out trading ships...
You don't get it. This isn't an online pass so you can play online or play the game. It's an online pass so you can play some single player content. It matters to each and every player in the XBox and PS3 market that ether wanted to trade it in or buy it used because it devalued the game. That one little trick caused the price of it used to drop faster which also means less trade in value (47.99 instead of 54.99). Developers and Publishers want to think that these hurt their sales. In truth they are what are driving their sales. Without the economic flow from the used game sales the new game sales would be a smaller pie. And personally I don't buy or play Ubisoft titles like ANNO 2070 because of their always on DRM for single player.
You can tell its fantasy, but not the genre. Is it a hack and slash? RPG? Strategy? Does the box art help? What do the screenshots look like?
The US won the War or 1812. Minus having to build a new White House we got everything we wanted at the onset of the war.
You might say the same thing about Viet Nam. Funny thing about wars, they tend to disproportionately kill people willing to die in defense of their country, albeit those who are easily led. As it turns out, that's most people.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
More like willful ignorance - the most common American trait there is.
AccountKiller
What the heck are you talking about? The USA lost the Vietnam War, there's no question about it. The goal was to stop the spread of (chinese/soviet-backed) communism, by getting involved in a civil war and backing the non-communist side. The USA failed; they finally pulled out, and the communist side took over the country. That conflict bears zero resemblance to the War of 1812.
Finally, the Vietnam conflict didn't just kill Americans "willing to die in defense of their country". In case you don't remember, they had a draft back then. Lots of people had no interest in going to war, but when they got called, they either tried to escape to Canada or they went ahead and went, hoping they'd be OK (and a lot weren't).
Finally, the Vietnam war didn't even have similar motives. The War of 1812 happened because of British actions as the AC above stated. It's pretty bad when a foreign power seizes your merchant ships, kidnaps the sailors, and forces them to fight in their armed services. Vietnam, on the other hand, was no threat at all to the USA, and was really in a civil war (sound familiar?). We got involved there partly because of communism, and partly because our French buddies had their asses kicked there and wanted to preserve their colonial interests there. Vietnam has far more parallels to Cuba and the Bay of Pigs (except in that conflict, we changed our mind at the last minute and didn't show up, much like what happened at the end of Desert Storm in the early 90s, leading to a slaughter).
"n case you don't remember, they had a draft back then. Lots of people had no interest in going to war, but when they got called, they either tried to escape to Canada or they went ahead and went, hoping they'd be OK (and a lot weren't)."
No James Madison was President. And there was not a Draft. He was generally opposed to war. The draft occurred during the Civil War not 1812.
I understand completely. And it's not an issue. If anything they made more money doing it this way and needed to sell less copies. I know you don't want to hear that because you believe used game sales add value, but frankly, they don't. The huge array of very successful titles through steam should give you a clue as to why this works.
On the other side of this, which is where I am, used game sales have been an unmitigated disaster for the industry as a whole. It has created a perverse adversarial relationship between us, the developers, and gamestop the prime seller of our games (well, 25% of the overall market) as well as the prime purveyor of used games.
Notice how there are no used game sales for diablo? MMO's? Anything on any of the online marketplaces etc? Right. Physical boxes exist to build interest in a brand, and even then it's usually a money pit these days, because who the hell wants to print 40k copies of a game for walmart and gamestop when it probably won't even sell 40k copies. You are far more likely to be successful with a banner ad on steam than boxed copies in stores (where the big brands of maddens, skyrim, etc all pay for the good shelf space).
Preventing used game sales, for example, by only releasing our titles through online distributors (PSN, XBL, Steam, etc.) you make a shit load more money, even if the total number of copies sold is less. Now when you're really big, skyrim big, you can afford used game sales because people will play your game long enough, and enough people will be there day one, that the used market will be lost profit on top of a mountain of profit. For everyone else it has been a giant plague on the industry. Where we could sell 100k units, and make a living before used games were prevalent, now we'll sell 50k units, that are resold 3 times. It shifts the entire industry to an advertising exercise making sure your game is bought on day one, because after that you're basically fucked (and btw, having a game that spends 4x as much on advertising as making the actual game will piss you off too, which is what the big guys do these days). Sure, more people are playing the game, but you're getting half as much money (and actually the numbers are generally dramatically worse than that but I don't have them in front of me at the moment*).
And I don't care that you didn't play ANNO 2070. Really, I don't. They've sold a shitload of copies for what is a crushingly niche game. As in hundreds of thousands of copies. As as ARMA II on the PC. Where there are no used sales via steam. That's the future. Because it has to be. We cannot keep running an industry on 40% government subsidies.
Remember, I'm advocating (perhaps later in this thread) that they cut their price to boost sales. That is a good idea absent used game sales. But you can *never* compete with the identical product for less money used. Ever. People have tried. It fails.
This also ties into another thread from today, about games wrecking kids. The article itself is overblown, but it's decidedly not healthy to have people rush out, buy a game, play it for 8-20-40 hours straight, sell it used. Which is what happens a lot. We can track these things you know.
*I'm sure I've posted it before on here somewhere. But I think for the last big project I worked on it was something like a factor of 6 or 7 x as many players as copies sold, which were down around 50% from the previous title in the series. But don't quote me. It was brutal though.
I'm talking about Vietnam. JFK/LBJ were President, there was a draft, and they were all for war. Heck, the Americans even started the war by fabricating the Gulf of Tonkin incident.
Blah blah graphics blah blah voice actors blah blah costs too much and people only want to have fun. That's like saying ALL books should be written in the style of Harry Potter because that's how you make teh moniez and that's all that matters!!
People will always want something deeper than Harry Potter from time to time. They'll always want something different. For me, gaming is not always about fun -- in fact, if i'm playing a game and not smiling I'm probably having a blast. A lot of the time it's about the experience. Drop me in the middle of a (pretty) category 5 hurricane with some guns and tell me to rescue a princess (with a good voice actor) and I'm set. The experience matters to me and probably to a lot of folks. I will continue to support Studios with many $100s of dollars for producing games that give me the experience I want.
Here.
Check out the post from Derek Smart about 2/3 way down the page. (Disclaimer: I don't know any of these people personally).
So piracy made them lose sales. Butt piracy that is.
Getting $75 million in no strings attached loans rocks. Lesson 2: Corporate welfare rules.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
An article at Massively goes through some of the lessons the video game industry needs to learn from this situation.
Frankly, these lessons have been discovered 20 years ago in video games.
They are still not learned, and the same problems appear again.
I've been a game developer most of my life, and what I saw is that egos were ruining games.
A single guy has an idea, and is able to attract people to invest in his idea.
The problem is that having the idea and selling it is the easiest part of a project.
After getting money, the boss wants to reduce the risk of his "baby", so he hires a lot of people (who never wrote a game), and a lot of management to handle all these people (perferably with a lot of diplomas, diplomas=less risks).
Only one bad manager can spoil the whole pyramid, and it's probably what happened.
This can be easily avoided with decent people (people knowing how to write games), and less management (to avoid useless effort), but hiring people helps to feel your own power (and self-importance), so the same shit will appear again and again.
That little trick they did could also be what cost them sales, but you can't actually measure sales lost because the user-base decided that they weren't going to take it. It breads negative sentiment for the brand.
Lets see if you understand even a little bit of economics. Game Stop puts about 1 billion a year into the hands of Gamers. This is based off of their Reported Profits from Used Game Sales. That 1 Billion then goes to ether New games or other Used games. You might think that the Used game sale costs the Developer something, but in Reality it freed up some cash so that the Gamer who traded in the New Game first can buy another New Game. If he didn't that would reduce the Speed of how many games in total that they would be able to buy in a Year. The same logic applies to the Used Car Market. Stopping Used game sales could end up causing the New game sales to contract by 1 to 2 billion dollars since it doesn't just stop the 1 billion from getting into the gamers hands but also puts a stop to the over all flow of games. The overall market would have a contraction of over 5 billion since it would kill the 3 Billion in GameStop Used games and contract the New game market as well. If you're goal is to kill the industry this is exactly how you should do it. I've heard these excuses before. I'm old enough to remember Nintendo complain about Block Buster Rentals. Up until recently they've had a Recession Proof Industry, and the lost Sales the last few years is clearly due to the Recession, and has nothing to do with Used Games. The Profits from used games can also be tied to their price hike. Nintendo Warned them that it was a bad idea to increase the cost of development too much, and look at what it got them. A price hike that has caused Used Games to become preferable and made it so they no longer have a Recession Proof Industry. And this year we're in a flip where People arn't buying much because New Consoles are around the corner and new AAA games are being put onto systems that aren't out yet so supply is contracting. It happens every Console Cycle.
Cry Me A River
"War of 1812, Vietnam war, Bay of Pigs... shall I continue?"
Uhhh...CAN you continue?
I saw Amalur advertised. It looked interesting. I checked Steam, it was 60$. I mentally filed it under "maybe someday if there's a sale". Sale didn't happen before developer tanked.
Maybe now it'll go on sale?
The preceding comment is my own, and in no way construes an opinon of the Emperor of Mankind.
The goal was to stop the spread of (chinese/soviet-backed) communism, by getting involved in a civil war and backing the non-communist side.
That's what they told you. It's cute that you believe it.
Finally, the Vietnam conflict didn't just kill Americans "willing to die in defense of their country". In case you don't remember, they had a draft back then.
If you open up a dictionary and look up "disproportionately" you'll see what I'm talking about.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning sounds like a sequel to me. Since I didn't play the "original" Kingdoms of Amalur, I'll skip this one.
Those of us who knew what Amalur was also knew it was a failed mmo that got retooled as a single player game, which is enough to keep any sane gamer away.
"The television station also reported the company isn't incorporated in Rhode Island, but rather Delaware as a limited liability company, which would deem 38 Studios ineligible for tax credits in the state."
This is fraud if anyone but a famous, rich athlete does it.
gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
Bull-fucking-shit. You know who made money on games? iD Software. You know when some of their biggest money makers came about? When they GAVE their software away. I don't know if you remember, but used games used to be the norm, and people made money hand over fist. If anything, used game sales have never been lower than they have been now. And yet, you think it is somehow bad? It's only because you have no idea of history, or even economic theory.
Here's why used games cannot influence your sales:
1) Used games are a different product. Manuals are torn, CDs are scratched, and sometimes fun stuff like maps is missing.
2) You ALREADY got your sale. A used game can never be put into circulation without a first sale having occurred.
3) People who buy a game used are unlikely to have bought the game new. That's just basic economic principle. As a result, a used game sale cannot possibly equate a new game sale.
4) People who sell a game get more money for more games. A used game means that someone got money back to reinvest into a new game.
5) If your game is so shit that people play it once, then put it up for sale within 2 weeks, the problem is your game, not the economic model.
In short: fuck off and die. We are not renters. We are buyers. And a bit of a warning, coming from someone who has probably been gaming for longer than you have been alive: I already have a hard time accepting the always-on principle for games. I'm willing to make an exception for certain exceptional titles, but don't fool yourself for a second that all people will put up with buying a license for $60 or more.
Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
Yea, no used game sales for PC titles and have you noticed how PC game sales have been in the toilet for nearly 20 years? Diablo may have broken some PC records, but Its a drop in the bucket to what Consoles expect to make regularly. Million unit sellers on the PC are very rare.
Your bit about diablo is factually not true. 4 million units would be a big hit on any console. 4 million units combined between all the consoles and PC's would be very successful game. Not record breaking successful necessarily, but hugely successful. 5 million units and up is Madden and Call of duty territory (and bundled software like zelda, mario, kinect adventures wii fit). For comparison sake, the uncharted games each are under 4 million units in sales, as were the call of duty titles in 2007. If you sold 4 million units on either the 360 or PS3 you'd be in their top 10 best sellers ever.
And yes, Blizzard can shit virtual gold out their asses that becomes real gold by the time it's in the water in the toilet bowl. But that's not the point.
That little trick they did could also be what cost them sales, but you can't actually measure sales lost because the user-base decided that they weren't going to take it. It breads negative sentiment for the brand.
Again, not true. Our userbase is growing not shrinking. There are a handful of people that refuse to use facebook on privacy grounds too, that doesn't mean their market isn't expanding. Steam and consoles have numbers for how many unique user ID's etc etc. etc. are active. I'm not privy to console information but I know those guys can get reports if they move more than something like 6000 units on how many unique consoles access their games and so on. Why a number like 6000 I have no idea. We also have focus group testing and statistical analysis of surveys of game players and so on. This isn't the tiny little niche industry of 15 years ago. All of the tools every other industry can use to find out why people are (or aren't) buying/viewing/using their product we can use now. The big dogs are big enough to have actually capable analysts for just this sort of thing.
Most of the rest of your wall of text is full of gibberish. Yes gamestop has a shitload of revenue from used game sales, which is used to further used game sales. That's the whole problem. When you buy used you're giving money to gamestop. It inflates the value of the 'industry' but it pulls money away from the full production chain. When you buy from me you're giving money to me to make new games. There's no equivalent to a 'rental copy' with games like there is with movies. This really is not a difficult concept. The 'industry' can be bigger, but when the people who actually create the content for the industry aren't getting paid the industry as a whole is going to have to change. We don't have speaking fees and live performances to monetize the way movie stars and musicians do. Well ok, some of us get speaking and teaching fees, especially if you can speak multiple languages, and can train other game developers in the latest techniques.
The industry as a whole is doing 'badly' if you can call it that, because governments are rightly sick of giving huge kickbacks to developers, because new IP projects (like Kingdoms of Amalur) are tremendously risky bets, so most of the big publishers are not doing that, and because there's haven't been a great many games worth buying. Sure, I can sound off half a dozen or so that most gamers would like, a dozen or so niche titles that are popular. And then what? You know why that is? There's never enough money for big risks. That's party because budgets have shifted to advertising (first day sales), partly because as the industry has grown into a proper business it has to give shareholders value for their money, and neat ideas that might not make any money tend to be frowned upon. Overall the 'industry' is simply manouvring around the used game market and around piracy
"Finally, the Vietnam conflict didn't just kill Americans "willing to die in defense of their country".
To paraphrase Muhammad Ali, re: the Vietnam war:
'The white man sending the black and brown people to kill yellow people...'
And more accurately:
"I ain't got no quarrel with them Viet Cong... No Viet Cong ever called me nigger"
We know you are there. We just don't care.
And they should be thankful for that. When it comes to foreign countries, we've only got two modes: Apathy and Ass-kicking.
You don't like being ignored? Ok, how about we teach you to know your place? It's ass kicking time.
War of 1812, Vietnam war, Bay of Pigs... shall I continue?
Aaaand... the US lost territory in... which of those? Oh, please... go on. Just because we haven't won every single conflict we've been in doesn't change things. For good or for ill, the US is the preeminent power on this planet, militarily, socially, and economically. Consider this: for all that all the whiny little bitches in other countries like to cry and piss and moan about imperialist America, if America just ceased to exist at the stroke of midnight, say, tonight... do you have any idea what the fuck would happen to the rest of the world over the next 24-72 hours?
Well, where to start... first, Russia would retake most of it's satellite republics. Anyone who thinks they don't want them back is a fucking idiot, or just doesn't understand the power of addiction and the nature of the relationship between "mother" Russia and her former slave-states. Russia (and their "Soviet" ruling party) fed parasitically off them, and those men who ran that haven't actually gone away.
It's like crack. You don't just get clean and forget about it forever like it never had its hooks in you.
Israel would, along with much of the middle east, (depending on how many nukes Israel actually has,) turn into a smoldering crater.
Germany would call all the loans it's made to everyone, and when everyone couldn't pay, which of course they can't... I hate to speculate, but I suspect they'd send in the Wafen-Repo Guys, I think the company's called "Two Brownshirted Men and a Truck" and take whatever is of value and not nailed down.
China would EAT everything around it, replacing the US, in many respects without the constant haranguing other countries about "human rights" and "voting" on shit. Actually, this is happening very quietly, and in slow motion anyway... but if we disappeared, it would happen in fast-forward.
The Russians and Chinese would probably come to blows eventually, but that would be in the distant far-off future, perhaps months, or even years after the end of the US.
As for what would happen in Canada, Mexico, or any of the other little penny-any countries we suffer to exist in our hemisphere... who the fuck cares?
America is not, I am well aware, always the good-guy. In fact, for most of our history, in which many Americans want to white-wash us, and make us out to be good, the truth is we're bad, but the people we were fighting were mostly worse than bad... they were UGLY. (Get it? The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly?) Our own human rights record sucks ass, and although it could be much, much worse, like many other industrialized countries today, it could also stand to be a lot better, if, for instance, the federal government stopped stripping people of their rights, for crimes they can be railroaded into being found guilty of, or of murdering its own citizens and calling it "capital punishment" and of course, there's all the people in other countries that our country murders... which seems to me to be acts of war... but nobody has the balls anymore to go toe-to-toe with us, openly as a nation. The real reason there is such paranoia in our government about terrorism is that it's irregular AND asymmetric warfare... that is, they're not playing by OUR rules. We pulled the same thing on the British when we rebelled, using tactics they considered cowardly and dishonorable, but that was only because they had a larger, better armed force, which we couldn't fight the way they wanted us to fight. The list goes on and on.
The general global economy would probably collapse, and many other bad things as well. I personally would not want to see that.
We know you are there. We just don't care.
And they should be thankful for that. When it comes to foreign countries, we've only got two modes: Apathy and Ass-kicking.
You don't like being ignored? Ok, how about we teach you to know your place? It's ass kicking time.
War of 1812, Vietnam war, Bay of Pigs... shall I continue?
War of 1812... are we British subjects? Then I'd say we WON that one, considering his Dickheadishness the King was trying to retake his former colonies...
Vietnam... are we Vietnamese now? Then I'd say we WON that one. In fact, I have a bunch of clothing made in Vietnam, according to the tags. Think 'bout THAT.
Bay of Pigs... are we Cubans now? The I'd say we WON that one too. Okay, fuck you, yeah, we lost that one, but that was because we had a Democrat trying to start a war, which almost invariably ends badly for us.
If the US weren't always putting it's dick in everyone's faces, sure, we wouldn't be hated (envied) around the world, but the North West Germans and the German Isles people off the coast of western Europe would all be speaking German, now, (not French and English respectively,) as would the South Germans, (who admittedly were already speaking German anyway) the East Germans, the Very East Germans, the South West Germans... basically, Europe would be called "Greater Germany," and maybe there might be a few people left permitted to speak Italian. Maybe.
So sometimes, you have to stick your dick in somebody's face, it's for the greater good.
And absolutely nothing in your entire wall of text supports your idea that used games hurt your industry. It's all conjecture that requires some basic economics to be 100% false, as well as some very real history to be utterly non-existent.
Tell you what: show me some data how many people who bought used games would have bought games new in the complete absence of new games. Note that it requires you to show that these would be the same people who would have otherwise paid full price. Furthermore, show me that people who sold new games would have bought more games even if there was no used game market.
If you can't, you're making crap up that flies in the face of history and economic theory. I know it feels good to blame your money problems on others stealing from you, but it doesn't change the fact that it is nothing but a delusion.
Oh, and for your information: the industry is actually created by the consumers. Without them, games would be nothing but a hobby.
Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
Well the man in question did come from a sport who's "World Series" is played exclusively by American teams. Maybe he genuinely didn't realise?
People who trade in used games use the money to buy new games. Ending the used game market ends in less new game sales.
Steam is different because Steam has aggressive discounting of games. Two giant sales a year with huge discounts, and many gamers pull their wallets out for those sales. There is no equivalent on Xbox, PS3, or Wii.
My second point is that when I was growing up, I lived off used games. There was no way I could afford new games. If I hadn't been able to buy used games, I might not be a gamer today.
I highly doubt that ending used game sales would grow the video game industry. Microsoft, Sony, and Nintendo have had years to try to replicate Steam's model. They haven't. Downloadable games on those services are rarely discounted, and when they are, the discounts are not fantastic. Usually 25 - 50%, whereas Steam regularly features games discounted 75 - 90% off. And all those games selling with online passes that are supposed to kill used games sales? Still cost $60.
The game companies want to suck more money out of gamers. I don't think they will be successful. I think they are shooting themselves in the foot. Ending used game sales will drive some people from video games. It will result in less sales.
Your logic is retarded (and you probably are of below average intelligence as well). If what you say is true, then if we somehow magically stop people from pirating Windows, they all would switch to Linux. They wont. Most of them would end up buying Windows.
Oh, and for your information: the industry is actually created by the consumers. Without them, games would be nothing but a hobby.
So? That is irrelevant.
Vietnam got its ass kicked. True, the US eventually pulled out because the cost was no longer worth trying to stop the communists, but the cost to Vietnam was very, very high.
Out of curiosity, in your version of history, when did Toronto become part of America?
The problem with Kingdoms of Amalur was the DLC.
From day 1 there was DLC to prevent resale of the game, then there are 2 more additions shortly afterwards. Players feel screwed if the game that was just finished has paid DLC which means it clearly could've been IN the game, players feel screwed if they can't resell a SINGLE PLAYER game because there is no intrinsic value in it because of the DLC.
Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
No, they succeeded. It may have been a Pyrrhic victory (estimates put their losses at 1,000,000 Viet Cong), but they did win; they drove out the western imperialists and took over the country with their communist government. The US didn't win squat; 50k American lives were lost along with who knows how much money, and the peoples' faith in their government was shattered.
There was a war in 1812. The US was largely not involved. It was a guy with one of the biggest sets of ass-kicking boots in history getting pwned by Russian winter.
The day Canada was part of the continent of North America?
Is that a trick question?
You know who made money on games? iD Software.
Dude.. the VG business is a 100billion dollar behemoth. Stop giving these tiny useless examples. ID software haven't done anything of relevance for about a decade except lose money on shit games Doom3? Yuck.. Rage? Yawn... Hardly anyone even licences their new engines anymore. Gone are the quake3 days , its all Unreal now. The only good thing they've done is put out open source copies of their earlier engines.
Either give some statistically relevant examples or shut the fuck up. Or better yet, kill all your friends, family and then yourself. It will be a net benefit to this planet and the gene pool.
Here's why used games cannot influence your sales:
Stop mouthing of random shit. Demonstrate that any of those are relevant, outside of your own brain.
Hmm, I actually enjoyed KoA. For me, it was more entertaining than something like Assassins Creed where apart from the first one, I just felt completely ripped off for each successive sequel.
Ending used game sales won't grow the industry. It will put more money in the hands of developers and give more pricing options for developers willing to take those risks.
Which is exactly what steam does on the PC. Although steam sets the prices a lot of the time, not developers, I've been bitten by that twice now. Getting 59 cents for a game you were selling for 14 dollars a week earlier isn't as great as it sounds.
This isn't the industry of 10 years ago. Pretty much everything in your post assumes it's the industry of 10 years go.
1) used games aren't a different product. Gamestop insures the disk, and no one reads manuals so people stopped printing them.
2)Right. And? If it gets resold 5x that's 5 copies that didn't kick cash back to me. The problem isn't so much that people sell their old collection of PS2 games. It's that the afternoon of release there are used copies on the shelf at gamestop for 5 dollars less than whatever you were charging.
3) Not true. They're deciding on price.
4)No, they got money to spend on a cycle of used games, which is outside of the creation of the games themselves.
5) I said somewhere else. Making games that people have to play for 80 hours to properly see and experience probably isn't a great plan, and a 20 hour game kids will take home, play in one continuous sitting and then resell because they get the maximum value that way (gamestop paying the most money for their re-used copy). We actually track these kinds of things with achievements, and that isn't really good behaviour for anyone, the player or the industry either.
I'm 32. But that's beside the point. Do you seriously think anyone in the industry wants to build always on systems? Obviously when you're making WoW you do, but most of the rest of them, no way. That's a huge amount of work that isn't making an actual game. It's a significant testing and development exercise to try and contrive some justification that 'benefits the player' for this online service that they aren't actually using. In the same way that 200 million dollar advertising budgets to ensure first day hype and sales are not the 60 million dollars spent actually making the game. All of these things are done because if you sell your game once and it's re-sold used 4 or 5 times in the first couple of weeks I'm only making one sale on the back of gamestop.
but don't fool yourself for a second that all people will put up with buying a license for $60 or more.
In the same way people won't put up with all the privacy invasions of facebook? That's the argument you just made, well that and a veiled death threat, clearly you've been around the industry long enough to have adopted the appropriate level of maturity for what is a business and technical discussion. The 60 dollar price point is convention, as is layered throughout this thread, steam can quite successful iterate on price if people are into that sort of thing. You can't really do much on the 60 dollar price point when gamestop will always sell for 5 dollars less though.
Oh and yes, I remember when id (note they officially spell it id not iD ) was giving away free demo's and so on. Hell, I still have my commander keen floppies. Back then you could make a game for 300 or 400k and make money as long as it did kind of OK. A lot of us are at a similiar price point now (give or take inflation, and a 40% government kickback and you can buy a lot of stuff that cost about 600k to make for the publisher). But the market has changed, if id was doing so well they wouldn't have had to sell themselves to Zenimax. As I recall the strategy was to give away either the demo or a full game for free and sell later installments (lets call them MLC or mail loaded content) by passing retail and maximizing their revenue per user.
When you employ 10 people, and make 3 games a year your business plan can be very different than when you employ 200 and release a new game every 3.
BS. Better and cheaper panels existed 30 years ago, and were not invented by chinese people whatsoever.
Yes. The list is far too long. All these victims don't forget.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_the_United_States
the US lost the war of 1812, the US 2 main objectives, they failed at ,Stop the impressement of Sailors, occurred naturally due to the end of the Napoleonic wars and territorial expansion into Canada, they failed at.Basically the US tried to invade Canada generally got there arse's handed to them, and because of that the World has William Shatner and Celine Dion.
Bundled territory is 20 Million + in the Nintendo Console arena. Just do a little lookup on something like VGCharz
Again
Cry Me A River
The Part about assaulting their User Base was actually directed at KoA, but I can see how you thought I was attacking Blizzard. Writing nice clear html on slashdot is for crazies. Yes the video game Industry was considered Recession Proof up until 2008. Just like the Alcohol Industry. Do some research and you'll see that they never actually were hit by any of the recessions up until then. A Slump is actually different then a recession. In the 80's the "slump" was Atari imploding. Again do some research and you'll see. That ET video game nearly killed them.
It is pretty sophisticated stuff. Clearly has gone over your head for most if not all of your life.
You've made the mistake that every publish and dev that's railed against Rentals and Used Sales. You're assumption is that those buyers would buy your game at the regular retail prices. The honest truth is that they won't and never will. Back when you could expect a regular price drop in a Video Game these people just waited a couple of months for the first wave of price drops. EA and others have gotten so good at making sure they don't flood the market so that regular price drops are rare. When a game has been out for a year and is still being sold at 60$ their is a problem. This behavior took sales away, and made rentals and used games more valued. Between the Price Hike and Supply Control the Publishers have squeezed the maximum amount of profit out of the system. Any attempt to squeeze more just pushes more people to Used and Rentals. If you actually want to learn something go lookup the economics of the Car Industry and see how it uses the Lease and Used markets.
So you too are lamenting Canada's Independence from the US? :)
NONE of the Americans who died in the Vietnam War died "in defense of their country". The Vietnamese dead did that. The Americans who died there died as foreign invaders.
in soviet amerikkka, america is always valiant defender against foreign invaders
even, especially, when they are the ones doing the invading.
you know something? america as the arrogant rapist of the world is actually pretty accurate imagery.
I never said that any Americans died there in defense of their country. I said that some Americans died there who were willing to die in defense of their country.
It will actually put Zero additional dollars into the hands of the developers. And it will shrink the Gaming Industry by 25%.
I agree with everything you stated. I got Amalur, just to tie me over till D3 came out. after about a 18game hours into it i was almost done and felt as if it lacked something.. like a better story line, or good DLC. the visuals left a lot out. the only fun thing was the end moves you did on Larger Bad guys, but you can see those on YouTube now, no need to pay for a game so see something cool from it, if you can check it out on youTube ;-)
plus a game & world that none of my techie buddies knows or cares about seems strange that they would drop so much $$ into it. kickstarter anyone? lol