Slashdot Mirror


Sergey Brin Demos Google Glasses Prototype

MojoKid writes "Folks have been clamoring for more on Google's Project Glass and Sergey Brin — one of the co-founders of Google — is now burying himself in the R&D department associated with its development. Recently Brin appeared on 'The Gavin Newsom Show' with the prototype glasses perched on his face. The visit was actually a bit awkward as you can see in the video, as it's a lot of Brin and Newsom describing what they're seeing via the glasses with no visual for the audience. However, Brin dropped a bomb when he stated that he'd like to have the glasses out as early as next year."

122 comments

  1. Google Glasses? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'll pair these with the hated headphones from the previous story, and occupy my own, private digital HELL!

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:Google Glasses? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Funny

      More like Google Goggles. Or just Googgles?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Google Glasses? by AngryDeuce · · Score: 1

      Googoggles.

    3. Re:Google Glasses? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Dr. Seuss, will you please claim prior art?

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    4. Re:Google Glasses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dr. Seuss, will you please claim prior art?

      Prior art?

    5. Re:Google Glasses? by NickFortune · · Score: 2

      I'll pair these with the hated headphones from the previous story, and occupy my own, private digital HELL!

      It does make me wonder as to the business plan. I can imagine these things being given away free, but with small discrete text ads in your top right peripheral vision.

      On the other hand, imagine if Google subsidiary Doubleclick gets to handle the business. They'll be inserting hallucinations of monster movie serial killers into your left side periphery, and then using the right eye to advertise psycho-analysis.

      Still, could be worse. If it was Microsoft Goggles, they scan for apple logos replace them with the windows symbol. And if they detected a screen from a working replace Linux box, they'd overlay it with a static blue-screen-of-death image.

      Oh the possibilities! :)

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
    6. Re:Google Glasses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll pair these with the hated headphones from the previous story, and occupy my own, private digital HELL!

      It does make me wonder as to the business plan. I can imagine these things being given away free, but with small discrete text ads in your top right peripheral vision.

      On the other hand, imagine if Google subsidiary Doubleclick gets to handle the business. They'll be inserting hallucinations of monster movie serial killers into your left side periphery, and then using the right eye to advertise psycho-analysis.

      Still, could be worse. If it was Microsoft Goggles, they scan for apple logos replace them with the windows symbol. And if they detected a screen from a working replace Linux box, they'd overlay it with a static blue-screen-of-death image.

      Oh the possibilities! :)

      They could be scriptable? Cool. Ive always wanted a pair of Perl-sensitive glasses.

    7. Re:Google Glasses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Google Goggles is already the name of a fairly cool adroid app.

    8. Re:Google Glasses? by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      "Hell is other people."

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Exit

      --
      bickerdyke
    9. Re:Google Glasses? by jonadab · · Score: 3, Funny

      Will you claim it in a StreetView van? Will you claim it as a Google fan?

      I will not claim it in a van, I will not claim it as a fan.
      I do not like this prior art, I do not like it Sam Thou Art.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    10. Re:Google Glasses? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      âoeWhat is hell? Hell is oneself.
      Hell is alone, the other figures in it
      Merely projections. There is nothing to escape from
      And nothing to escape to. One is always alone.â
      â T.S. Eliot

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    11. Re:Google Glasses? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Excellent.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    12. Re:Google Glasses? by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      Which would be perfect if these glasses ran Android and had some of the same kinds of functionality, searching for images based on where your eyes targeted. Popping up Terminator-style narratives for things you see would be awesome.

    13. Re:Google Glasses? by NickFortune · · Score: 1

      They could be scriptable? Cool. Ive always wanted a pair of Perl-sensitive glasses.

      Hey, now there's a fun thought. How long before the first X-Ray Specs app is released, I wonder.

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
  2. Want. Now. by jakimfett · · Score: 3, Funny

    Every geek wants a pair of these yesterday. As soon as Google can get a version of them ready to go, I predict they'll sell like...well...not hotcakes, but probably like Android based phones.

    --
    Bits of code, random ramblings: jakimfett.com
    1. Re:Want. Now. by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Funny

      Couple these with the Google butt-plug, and Sergey will have covered all the exits!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    2. Re:Want. Now. by jakimfett · · Score: 1

      Eh, you're forgetting the mouth and the fingers.

      --
      Bits of code, random ramblings: jakimfett.com
    3. Re:Want. Now. by rebot777 · · Score: 1

      These would be cool. I'm still not sure about the interface though. I don't really want to dictate my interactions and I doubt head nods would be less annoying.

    4. Re:Want. Now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Meh. I don't really see the first couple of generations of this making a difference on how I compute today. I'd much rather have a functional piece of equipment than a "geeky" piece of equipment.

    5. Re:Want. Now. by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      I believe they've already canceled Google Wave.

    6. Re:Want. Now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you could pair it with your phone and control it wirelessly too?

    7. Re:Want. Now. by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Wave goodbye... At least they didn't make a comic for it.

      http://i124.photobucket.com/albums/p30/mrstash/Picture6-1.png

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    8. Re:Want. Now. by ThePeices · · Score: 1

      I'd much rather have a functional piece of equipment than a "geeky" piece of equipment.

      Has 'functional' and 'geeky' suddenly become mutually exclusive now?

      Citation needed.

    9. Re:Want. Now. by TheLink · · Score: 2

      It's a start. I hope they get on with it, I've been waiting since the 1990s where we had all the basics (but even the iphone would not have been viable back then - no suitable ecosystem to thrive in).

      First generation: virtual telepathy kinda there, but needs brain computer interface for to be more seamless.

      Missing: control via thought macros (need brain computer interface for that). Also missing: ability to recall and store stuff by linking them with arbitrary thought patterns/sequences.

      Missing: virtual telekinesis- need "building/area/room" servers and similar.

      Missing: mindï augmentation stuff like face/object recognition to help you find/track people/objects in a crowd/area. Or count them quickly - the computer can highlight the stuff for the human to confirm/verify (humans can be quite fast at noticing if the computer has highlighted the wrong object, and may notice if the computer has missed stuff). If the Gov is going to track number plates, maybe the citizens should too - all these big shots visiting their mistresses better beware.

      The virtual eidetic memory should always record at low res+fps, but keep the past X minutes at high res+fps in a circular buffer, so you can start recording at high res without missing stuff (this applies to both video and sound). It should also try to do a voice recognition transcript (processing realtime or while you are sleeping look up HARK for sound source separation) so you can more easily search for stuff later.

      Problems: copyright law might cripple us to be less than what is possible technically.

      See also: http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2848877&cid=39996993

      --
    10. Re:Want. Now. by game+kid · · Score: 1

      I thought Larry Page was the Chief Orifice Officer of Google! I mean, with the whole shouting-down-Brin-over-how-much-to-track thing and all, I think he'd fuck us over first.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    11. Re:Want. Now. by jakimfett · · Score: 2

      I kinda like this idea. Just use the glasses as a HUD, where you can set a threshold for events to be displayed. Then, if I want, I can pull out my phone, hit the home key or power button, and the display comes fully alive, controlled by me and my input to my phone. Or better yet, gesture control using the camera....but that's probably just me dreaming again.

      --
      Bits of code, random ramblings: jakimfett.com
    12. Re:Want. Now. by TapeCutter · · Score: 2

      where you can set a threshold for events to be displayed

      Great idea, in the future when I ask "where are my glasses" out loud they could SMS "on top of your head you silly old fart" to my phone.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    13. Re:Want. Now. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "Virtual telepathy" is my explaination as to why we can't find any advanced aliens, as soon as it's invented they start punching each other, glasses or no glasses.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    14. Re:Want. Now. by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      i dont understand. what is this thing useful for? except looking stupid in public. why can't i just whip out my for for much better quality info?

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    15. Re:Want. Now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Google butt-plug. Man, am I glad that Microsoft didn't come up with that one. Can you imagine what Clippy would say?

    16. Re:Want. Now. by jakimfett · · Score: 2

      ...what is this thing useful for?

      For the average person, perhaps not so much. But it's not that these, as they exist right now, are particularly useful. It's the possibilities, when a world full of geeks and nerds says "hmm...I betcha I could make it do something crazy..."

      With a pair of these, a surgeon now has the ability to pull up live info about a patient while they are elbows deep in viscera. With these, a machine operator or plant manager can see heat readouts, fuel use, and downtime reports. With these (and a bit of software hacking), the camera can allow you to track where the person is looking, and overlay an augmented reality on the world around a user, giving them data about what they are seeing and what is nearby. With these (and a bit of hardware hacking, or just by using a specific model provided by Google for this purpose), a fireman or police officer can tap into the infrared or ultraviolet spectrum, allowing them to see through smoke or darkness and identify survivors in case of an environmental catastrophe.

      The list goes on, much longer than this, and I garentee that there will be applications that me, you, and even Google never thought of. Just look at some of the stuff that people are doing with the Kinect motion sensor, or the Raspberry Pi micro pc. Give people a sandbox, and they will come up with a hundred and ten ways to make something amazing.

      --
      Bits of code, random ramblings: jakimfett.com
    17. Re:Want. Now. by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      They called it "Microsoft Orifice".

      "It looks like you're trying to stick something in your arse..."

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    18. Re:Want. Now. by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Telepathy will be more like voice communication. Reading other people's minds against their will is still going to be difficult.

      See:
      http://media.caltech.edu/press_releases/12710
      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1081332/The-Jennifer-Aniston-brain-cell-How-single-neurons-spring-action-pictures-favourite-celebrities.html

      One person's "Jennifer Aniston" cell is going to be different from another person's. Or it may not even be present till that person knows more about her...

      The only way you can figure out whether a cell is a person's "Halle Berry" cell is if you present a "Halle Berry" stimulus to them and then do the measurement.

      That's what a person's wearable computer + BCI could do, and that's how it may be possible to do the virtual eidetic memory + thought pattern store and recall thing. You have an object/media recording, you pick a thought to associate with it, test recall, confirm. So if you ask your computer to do a recall/retrieve and the previous particular bunch of brain cells are firing, your computer recalls that object. You could associate a particular "Jennifer Aniston" picture with a "dancing purple barney" if you want...

      Someone might be able to figure out some of what you've been thinking by stealing/accessing your wearable computer or backups, and going through the logs/history (activity, location, storage/recall, etc). But the security conscious might have the stuff encrypted and without the right thought pattern sequence and/or passphrase it might be hard to crack.

      --
    19. Re:Want. Now. by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      Steve Ballmer has guaranteed that a Microsoft product with these features will be on the market within the year, and that this Google product is "not what the market wants, laughable in fact!" watch this space!

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
  3. Rare footage of them out and about by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Funny

    Here was see an early version of Google Glasses out and about! I can't wait!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Rare footage of them out and about by Daley_G · · Score: 1

      Just an FYI, with well over 2 million views, it's hardly rare. That being said, I'd not seen that vid yet - thanks for the link!

    2. Re:Rare footage of them out and about by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's another great video I'm sure you will also despise and others enjoy!

      There are others, but oddly even though those two videos came out very shortly after the first Google Glasses video, they are still the best.

      Have a great life! I mean that non-sarcastically, I hope things look up for you.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:Rare footage of them out and about by MrEricSir · · Score: 2
      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    4. Re:Rare footage of them out and about by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 2

      If it were that intrusive, I am pretty sure people would opt for an adblock.

    5. Re:Rare footage of them out and about by htnmmo · · Score: 1

      All those people that got lasik eye surgery will now be kicking themselves.

    6. Re:Rare footage of them out and about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      minus 1? that was clever: AC flamiing AC for being a troll

    7. Re:Rare footage of them out and about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calm down Sergey.

    8. Re:Rare footage of them out and about by microTodd · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link!

      You know what's funny? I watched this parody video and was just mildly amused. But then I went to watch the "official" real video on YouTube, and youtube gives me ad popups over the top of the video. So essentially, the official video now looks almost identical to the parody!

      Suddenly the parody isn't as funny anymore.

      --
      "You cannot find out which view is the right one by science in the ordinary sense." - C.S. Lewis on Intelligent Design
  4. Price? by Hentes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    VR glasses are nothing new, the big question is whether this one will be actually affordable by the general public.

    1. Re:Price? by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      These are not VR glasses. They aren't even augmented reality glasses. They are essentially your smart phone on your eyeball as opposed to a small video screen.

    2. Re:Price? by takeda64 · · Score: 1

      Did anyone wonder where the cpu will be contained? I mean, even the bluetooth headphones are relatively big because of the battery and radio needed. The teaser video implies that it would have GPU, Internet access, storage etc. I'm starting to think, that the only reasonable way this could be feasible to do today would be if it would be simply an accessory to the Android phone (perhaps using bluetooth or the WiFi direct?) What do you guys think?

    3. Re:Price? by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      Yes it's probably going to be two parts an eye piece and something in your pocket.

    4. Re:Price? by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      I'd really prefer if it was a two part system with the goggles talking to something in my pocket, or on my desk, or in my car, with painless way to transfer between them. I'd like a contextually aware display please.

  5. Just wait for the apps! by sandytaru · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm wondering how these will fare compared to some of their sci-fi counterparts did, actually. So far the most interesting take on augmented reality I've read/watched has been from the series Denno Coil, but this sort of technology has featured in a few other dystopias, too.

    --
    Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    1. Re:Just wait for the apps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm wondering how these will fare compared to some of their sci-fi counterparts did, actually."

      They can display "Fuck you, asshole" like Arnold got it in his internal ones.

    2. Re:Just wait for the apps! by k(wi)r(kipedia) · · Score: 1

      Augmented reality has figured prominently inJapanese cartoons. Ghost in the Shell is a more famous example of wearable augmented reality. However, augmented reality can take more conventional forms, such as a cellphone camera that can automatically place tags (identifieers) on the landmarks you point it to. Such already exists in low-tech form in some app(s) I'm too lazy to Google for right now.

    3. Re:Just wait for the apps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm wondering how these will fare compared to some of their sci-fi counterparts did, actually. So far the most interesting take on augmented reality I've read/watched has been from the series Denno Coil, but this sort of technology has featured in a few other dystopias, too.

      Actually the books "Daemon" and "Freedom TM" give a great description of using AR in everyday living.

  6. No usb interface? by phrackwulf · · Score: 1

    Or other way to demo what the user is seeing and send the signal to a nice big projector screen for Steve Balmer to scream about? I realize it is super small but this just seems like a pretty basic aspect. How do I debug the thing?

    --
    What would Richard Feynman do, if he were here right now? He'd do some math and he'd follow through!
    1. Re:No usb interface? by citizenr · · Score: 1

      Or other way to demo what the user is seeing and send the signal to a nice big projector screen for Steve Balmer to scream about? I realize it is super small but this just seems like a pretty basic aspect. How do I debug the thing?

      you cant show picture using wooden mockup.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
  7. headache inducing? by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If so, count me out.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  8. Google Rx glasses? by MsWhich · · Score: 2

    I'm tentatively excited about Google Glasses, but if they don't come up with some way to make it work for people with prescription lenses, I'm going to have to let the ship sail without me, I think. Never going back to contacts again, not even for groovy sci-fi VR glasses.

    1. Re:Google Rx glasses? by Galestar · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LASIK
      I have prescription glasses too. Might consider getting lasik if a) the glasses live up to their hype and b) my poor vision impedes my usage of them

      --
      AccountKiller
    2. Re:Google Rx glasses? by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      There have been a lot of advances in contact lenses over the past decade. These days, I wear a pair for a few weeks nonstop, and when they start to get itchy, peel em off and toss em and start with a fresh pair. About the only time I notice them is when I first wake up, and a few drops of solution solves that problem.

      That said, when the Goggles were introduced, Google said they'd have a pair that were designed to clip onto regular glasses instead of be stand alone glasses unto themselves.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    3. Re:Google Rx glasses? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I recall reading somewhere that they specifically said that there will be a model to use with regular prescription eyeglasses.

    4. Re:Google Rx glasses? by Dodgy+G33za · · Score: 1

      Worked wonders for me. Before I couldn't see a clock radio the far side of the bed. Haven't needed glasses the last 14 years, but old age is kicking in now.

      Two downsides. Firstly you do lose a bit of clarity in low light situations due to the scarring scattering light. Secondly, the aftermath of the procedure is pretty unpleasant (eyes get watery and itchy for a couple of days), although the compensation of immediately being able to see much more clearly is amazing.

    5. Re:Google Rx glasses? by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      And for those of us who wear bifocals?

      Yeah, gettin old sucks. I've had to wear bifocals for about 15 years now. Lasik scares the hell outta me. Lasers are cool and all that, but I get the willies thinking of anything coming at my eyes.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    6. Re:Google Rx glasses? by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      although the compensation of immediately being able to see much more clearly is amazing.

      Is it as amazing as putting on prescription glasses and avoiding the unpleasantness, cost, and the low-light clarity side-effects?

                      -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    7. Re:Google Rx glasses? by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      For one, technology is now a lot better than when the OP had it done. With advanced wavefront LASIK, you have basically zero night vision problems.

      For two, LASIK will actually SAVE you money over the long term, because the whole procedure is tax deductible and you will never again have to purchases glasses or contacts - which adds up... do the math for 20 years of optometrist visits and glasses / contacts. When you get LASIK, your optometrist visits are now covered for life through the company.

      I got my LASIK done back in March and I now have no night vision problems whatsoever - best investment I ever made.

    8. Re:Google Rx glasses? by Jaffa · · Score: 1

      I've got prescription glasses (and have had for many years) but find it's not the happy utopia you depict, so it's interesting to hear about the downsides to LASIK.

      For example, scratched lenses => headache inducing; with high-powered lenses, not getting exactly sitting right all the time => headache inducing; dirty lenses => headache inducing; frames => far more limited field of view.

    9. Re:Google Rx glasses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are not glasses, just a frame with a small screen on one side and they have been designed so people with prescription glasses can use them.
      --
      Sundar Pichai is the utter asshole whose incompetence has resulted in the shutdown of Google's Atlanta office.

    10. Re:Google Rx glasses? by GNious · · Score: 1

      Seeing the surgery(?) demonstrated, requiring the patient being awake while they peel away the outer layer of skin on your iris, scares the shit out of me.
      I know the eye is numbed, I know they are really good at this, that there are computers ensuring precision etc .... but no way I can go through that while being awake!

    11. Re:Google Rx glasses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do the math for 20 years of optometrist visits and glasses / contacts

      The contacts I understand, but how often do you go back for glasses?

    12. Re:Google Rx glasses? by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      Never going back to contacts again, not even for groovy sci-fi VR glasses.

      When was the last time your tried contacts? Materials science has come a looooong way in the last 10 years or so.

      Much more comfortable than they were in the 90s.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    13. Re:Google Rx glasses? by MsWhich · · Score: 1

      The early 2000s, actually. But my problem wasn't with the comfort or feel; that was never a problem. It was more that I missed the protective aspects of my glasses, and also I had trouble with distance focusing after I'd been looking at a computer screen for a while. (Which made driving home from work a dicey proposition.)

      Really it comes down to the fact that I actually enjoy my glasses and have no desire to get rid of them, which is also why I haven't gone for LASIK. But it sounds like Google will have options for us anachronistic types who like our lenses, so I'm content with that.

    14. Re:Google Rx glasses? by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Dude, no way I could go through that sober.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  9. Borg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    He's the freaking Borg. Please retire the Microsoft icon and apply it to Google. kthxbai.

  10. OMFG by satanclause · · Score: 2

    Some states are trying (ineffectually) to ban texting while driving... any bets on how long it will be before the first muppet causes an accident/kills someone due to having his/her vision impaired by Google Glasses!

    1. Re:OMFG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that's why they've also got the self driving car project.

    2. Re:OMFG by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure there was ever an epidemic of people dying while texting. It was more politicians who want to look like they are doing something proactive. In California they refused to ban cell phone driving until all the legislators got bluetooth headsets

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  11. Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bluetooth earpieces have been our for years and still look ridiculous. These are no different.

    1. Re:Dumb by matty619 · · Score: 1

      Ya, they do. But so what. I very much enjoy using my bluetoof headset while driving, or whilst typing with both hands, or while working on a cabling job, or any other sort of thing where I need to be on the phone and require both hands. I imagine there would be very many applications where the google glasses could come in handy as well. That being said if you're wearing either a bluetoof or google glasses to make a pretentious fashion statement alone, you should be slapped.

    2. Re:Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Dude.

      bluetoof

      WTF?

    3. Re:Dumb by matty619 · · Score: 1

      Don't take yourself too seriously man. It's just the internet.

    4. Re:Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are the Borg. Looks are irrelevant.

    5. Re:Dumb by Guignol · · Score: 1

      Well, as a french speaker, this is what that would bring to mind...
      Blue touffe :)

      *sigh* and here go my future possible claim as any sort of respectability as a member of this community...

  12. Brother AirScouter by matty619 · · Score: 2

    When I first heard of the Project Glass, I thought they had found a way of doing what some Japanese companies have been doing for a while...rather than displaying the image in *front* of your eye, they actually draw the image line by line directly *in* your eye on your retina with lasers. I still hold out hope that this is the long term goal of Project Glass, but who knows. A bit of reading Here

    And Here

    And Here

  13. A Minor Customer Request by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    Aside from looking like a confused refugee from the Borg, could someone work on some kind "styling?" There are several applications that this item, if not intrusive looking, would work nicely. I would think of it as a personal diary application.

  14. This is old technology. by GrpA · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Newer technology integrates the image directly into normal sunglass or prescription glasses lenses through optical waveguides to create an image focussed at infinity that is stable even if you're moving around.

    Vuzix has already made prototypes and the lenses look normal - though they did have a projector on the side of the lens. It was technology developed by Nokia and to see how impressive it actually is, take a look at this video.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atTqT7z00Kc&list=UUXV7-Fjn7hdQcINo7-T3mWQ&index=1&feature=plcp

    That's some video I got *through* the glasses at CES in January - And you'll notice that even though I can't keep the camera still, the image is rock steady within the active area of the glass lens. ( The lens is just a few millimeters thick ).

    The newer technology looks almost holographic and can certainly be made to provide a 3D image...

    Though if Google's glasses were really cheap, I'd still buy them. There's something to be said for a older but functional technology in a pair of glasses for $100 compared to the latest tech for more than $1000.

    GrpA

    --
    Enjoy science fiction? "Turing Evolved" - AI, Mecha, Androids and rail-gun battles. What more could you want?
    1. Re:This is old technology. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did it look better in person than it does in that video? Because that seemed pretty underwhelming to me, I could barely make out what was going on. With the baseball player, I could basically just make out a white silhouette of a person. I imagine there is some lossiness when recording it, but I'm curious how good it looks in person.

    2. Re:This is old technology. by Dodgy+G33za · · Score: 1

      I thought it was an exotic dancer of some sort, so concur with the "underwhelming" and "barely make out" comments.

    3. Re:This is old technology. by GrpA · · Score: 1

      There was a baseball player and an exotic dancer. The limitation of the system was that they were using a small projector ( 320x200 LCOS I thought, from the look of it ) to inject the image into the glasses. Though the lack of dynamic range in the camera and brightness control on the prototype made it difficult to work out - basically, it's designed to work in full sunlight and was bright enough to do so, but we were inside where I took the video so it just overwhelmed the camera and came out "overexposed" compared to the background image.

      They were working on smaller video projectors when I spoke to them, but the techs who developed the technology were not around to speak to.

      And yes, the image was still much better to my eye... It was one of the two things I found at CES that made the show worth attending.

      GrpA

      --
      Enjoy science fiction? "Turing Evolved" - AI, Mecha, Androids and rail-gun battles. What more could you want?
    4. Re:This is old technology. by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      It was one of the two things I found at CES that made the show worth attending.

      And what was the other thing?

  15. Old news by karolgajewski · · Score: 1

    This was news almost two months ago when he wore them here at an event for The Foundation Fighting Blindness.

    --
    - .k. -
    1. Re:Old news by matty619 · · Score: 1

      Except for the new news...that being a bit more concise release date, and the fact that he finally let someone else try it on on camera.

  16. ddos by bmimatt · · Score: 1

    At 4:00PM (local time), we all put the glasses on and look into our old school kaleidoscopes = hourly DDOS?

  17. Inevitable by optimism · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These glasses are definitely coming.

    From the video, they look small enough to be practical very very soon. Nice work, Sergey. :)

    Presumably they will connect via bluetooth to a smartphone or keypad in your pocket for an easy finger-based UI. And of course there will be a voice UI, like we have now with a small & simple BT headset.

    The big questions are a) battery life, b) how the various governments will assess this as a potential driving hazard, and c) whether Apple will steal Google's thunder by doing the same thing, only sleeker.

    I, for one, will be happy to buy a set of these glasses if the price is right. Hopefully less than US$1000.

    1. Re:Inevitable by Artcfox · · Score: 2

      Watch closely how Sergey operates the glasses. The side of it is actually a trackpad.

    2. Re:Inevitable by ModernGeek · · Score: 0

      I think that both the idea and implementation of this idea are deplorable at best. The problem with fame is that every stupid idea one has and every move one makes becomes a cornerstone for bland stories to be covered by the mainstream media (this now includes slashdot thanks to GeekNet), and gross over speculation/valuation of said ideas.

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    3. Re:Inevitable by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

      Even if you find this deplorable, I am not sure why you find media coverage undesirable. If more people find it deplorable (and learn about this through the media), someone could take the best parts of this idea, and remove the bad parts and come up with one you would like. Say someone could completely drop the eye projection, camera, and simply retain the earpiece and still provide excellent voice commands support for Android (I am not sure if you would like this or not, but this is something I would like). More coverage of brand new tech (and what could be a paradigm shift, and even worse, something that could be shoved down our throat in the future) is always good.

    4. Re:Inevitable by optimism · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I got that impression, though I wasn't sure if he was working a trackpad or jog-wheel or something else.

      I'd rather have the trackpad as a separate wireless controller, so I could keep my hand in my pocket, or on the steering wheel, or wherever else, instead of reaching up to my temple every time I need to control the glasses.

      Economy of motion will be a critical factor of adoption.

    5. Re:Inevitable by closer2it · · Score: 1

      The big questions are a) battery life, b) how the various governments will assess this as a potential driving hazard, and c) whether Apple will steal Google's thunder by doing the same thing, only sleeker.

      It seems they solved that problem. :)

  18. Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But can it read power levels?

    1. Re:Oblig by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Only up to 8,999 I've heard.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  19. Re:Correction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What does this post have to do with reality television?

  20. Re:bonch/Overly Critical Guy/SuperKendall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you working on getting laid ? You seem frustrated with life.

  21. WTF Google article... by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 0

    Interesting that the multi-billion dollar company that produces YouTube and things of that nature would choose some shitty no-name video player that can't even load properly.

    --
    If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    1. Re:WTF Google article... by aurasdoom · · Score: 1

      And you're too stupid to figure out that's not a google website.

  22. Is it safe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the kind of device you DO NOT want plasma-burn-in in.

  23. clowns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if this is all Silicon Valley has left these days... I'm heading to China....

  24. Re:Marketing ploy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sergey's new clothes?

  25. I'm sure it will be a technological marvel by DrXym · · Score: 1

    Certain kinds of tech such as bluetooth headsets, Segways look great on paper but make the user look like a complete dork. I think Google's glasses fit into that category too. Perhaps they will find a use in business, e.g. for people driving (as a kind of HUD with directions) especially for couriers, warehouses and so on but I see little utility for them in every day life.

  26. Girls will laugh at you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fundamental flaw with technology like this, built by a bunch of extremely smart geeks, is that it fails the "will girls laugh at me" test. And that is the death knell for all consumer technologies.

  27. Old News by Yvan256 · · Score: 1
  28. Navin R. Johnson, Jr. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Navin R. Johnson, Jr. -- The Jerk goes digital!

  29. Re:bonch/Overly Critical Guy/SuperKendall by Maritz · · Score: 1

    It's not healthy to care that much.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  30. I applaud the early adopters. by shadowrat · · Score: 1

    I'm eager for a future when my glasses or contacts have some magic screen that can overlay high res holographic images in my field of view, and this may be a step in that direction. However, it looks like the kind of tech that is more of a complication than a convenience. I'm supposed to walk around with that stupid thing on my head, taking up 33% of my field of view with it's screen all the time just so i can surreptitiously take a picture? At least my phone is only visible when i need it's information. At other times, it's really unobstrusive in my pocket.

    If I see you early adopters on the street, staring off into space, fiddling with cumbersomely tiny controls, trying to get your gps location on your goggles, i will laugh at you. Know though, that i appreciate everything you are doing to move this technology forward.

  31. I want OASIS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah! OASIS is coming....

  32. vision problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if it plays directly on your retina can they correct short /long sighteness problems via digital zoom and enhancement ?

  33. We are now in a post-tablet era by elabs · · Score: 1

    I hereby declare it. (or you could call it a post-post-pc era, but the term post-pc didn't make sense in the first place).

  34. Google Glass project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't wait for google glasses! When is the official release date? More info at the www.googleglassproject.com

  35. Still waiting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Im still waiting for the EyePhone.