Slashdot Mirror


Andromeda On Collision Course With the Milky Way

ananyo writes "From the Nature story: 'The Andromeda galaxy will collide with the Milky Way about 4 billion years from now, astronomers announced today. Although the Sun and other stars will remain intact, the titanic tumult is likely to shove the Solar System to the outskirts of the merged galaxies. Researchers came to that conclusion after using the Hubble Space Telescope between 2002 and 2010 to painstakingly track the motion of Andromeda as it inched along the sky. Andromeda, roughly 770,000 parsecs (2.5 million light years) away, is the nearest large spiral galaxy to the Milky Way.'"

48 of 217 comments (clear)

  1. 770,000 parsecs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought parsecs was a unit of time though? So 770,000 parsecs is about 4 billion years?

    So 12 parsecs is about 20 hours?

    1. Re:770,000 parsecs? by Jonathan+A · · Score: 2

      I thought parsecs was a unit of time though? So 770,000 parsecs is about 4 billion years?

      So 12 parsecs is about 20 hours?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parsec

      The parsec (symbol: pc) is a unit of length used in astronomy. It is about 3.26 light-years, which is equal to just under 31 trillion (3.1×1013) kilometres or just over 19 trillion (1.9×1013) miles.

    2. Re:770,000 parsecs? by mug+funky · · Score: 2

      aaah, i totally whooshed on the GP post. thank you for reminding me that this was a pop culture reference and not just a weird misconception (well, it's both i suppose, but the latter is on mr lucas).

    3. Re:770,000 parsecs? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Nope, I don't see a unit of time in there, sorry.

      P.S. you're all being trolled.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:770,000 parsecs? by Jappus · · Score: 4, Informative

      So. A measure of both distance and time, depending on your context.

      No. A parsec is "a distance corresponding to a parallax of one second". But here, "second" does not refer to the unit of time "second" but to an "arc-second", a specific angular value. If you have a circle, and you divide it into 360 parts, a single slice covers an angle of exactly one "degree" (do note that this in turn also does not refer to temperature). If you divide that slice into 60 parts, each slice covers an angle of 1 arc-minute. If you divide such a slice into another 60 parts, you get an angle that covers 1 arc-second.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arcsecond#Symbols_and_abbreviations

      As for what a parallax is, please read the link provided by the grandparent.

      But even if you had used a unit of time to define the parsec -- like in the light-year -- what you actually define is a pure length. Do note that you can define a light-year as both "the distance light crosses in an absolute vacuum in one solar year" or "9.4605284 x 10^15 meters". See how the latter does not include any reference to time? You could even express the light-year as the distance you can drive an object of a certain mass and shape when you accelerate it with a certain energy through a perfectly uniform medium of a certain density (thus slowing down the object eventually to a standstill).

      You can define a length with the help of a unit of time, but you don't need to. That is also why the 1 astronomical unit distance used in the parsec is also not a unit of time; as the fact that it derives from the rotation of the earth around the sun is unimportant as long as the ultimately defined value remains a pure time.

    5. Re:770,000 parsecs? by Jappus · · Score: 2

      [...] the ultimately defined value remains a pure time.

      Please mentally replace that part with "the ultimately defined value remains a pure unit of distance."

    6. Re:770,000 parsecs? by witherstaff · · Score: 3, Informative

      It was explained in a later SW expanded universe book that Kessle is surrounded by black holes so the shortest route is also the most dangerous. All things considered I thought it was a pretty good explanation.

    7. Re:770,000 parsecs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The WHOOSH is strong with this one.

    8. Re:770,000 parsecs? by Ol+Biscuitbarrel · · Score: 3, Funny

      A bigger question is where will the /. editors find room to store all of these geek cards?

    9. Re:770,000 parsecs? by almitydave · · Score: 2

      The way George Lucas explained it is, hyperspace is the same speed for everyone, but travelling through hyperspace requires complicated navigational computations to avoid gravity wells, and the Millennium Falcon's computer was so powerful that it could quickly compute a more complex, shorter route through space than the average smuggler's ship. Han was a hacker/overclocker, you see, as well as a mechanic. There are a couple references in the movies to "calculating the jump to lightspeed" and whatnot. Lucas claims of course he knew that parsecs were distance; this is how he always meant it from the beginning.

      DISCLAIMER: I'm not defending Lucas' explanation, although his explanation is plausible, I always thought the term was just misused. I don't buy that he meant it that way from the start, although it adds an interesting element to that method of FTL travel.

      --
      my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their
      I'm, you're, he's/she's/it's, we're, you're, they're
  2. oh noews! by j-stroy · · Score: 4, Funny

    can't we launch a mission to deflect it ? !

    1. Re:oh noews! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Eh, the Sun itself only has about 4.5 billion years left in it...So Andromeda slamming into us might be a welcome change by then.

    2. Re:oh noews! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nope, this event is clearly unavoidable. There is no way we have enough time to relocate or divert it.

      What if we used a crack team of roughnecks?

  3. Don't Panic by stms · · Score: 3, Funny

    Stop Panicking!!! This is no time to panic... Though if you do panic try to hold on to that feeling because it is the proper response to being told that your galaxy is on a collision course with another galaxy.

    1. Re:Don't Panic by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 2

      capable of moving very very far away.

      Why? When galaxies collide, they don't actually hit anything. Their stars just orbit the new centre of gravity (variable until the merger settles). Entire civilisations could rise and fall during the collision, and not notice it happening.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  4. Re:And this is news how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This may not be news to you, but I'm thankful to know so I could cancel my tickets to The Book Of Mormon while they're still refundable.

  5. Watch video of simulation of this collision by gupg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    NVIDIA showed a simulation of this collision running on their latest Tesla GPGPU based on the "Kepler" architecture

    Starts at around 1:00 on this video with a great explanation of the collision itself.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aByz-mxOXJM&feature=relmfu

    Sumit
    (NVIDIA employee)

    1. Re:Watch video of simulation of this collision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Andromeda-Milky Way collision starts at 2:54, before that is a recap of the Fermi architecture.

    2. Re:Watch video of simulation of this collision by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      Less talking more animation.

      Seriously they stop the thing like 20 times to talk.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    3. Re:Watch video of simulation of this collision by flimflammer · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can right click a video at any time and select "Copy link at current time"

      When you do that, which he likely did, it uses seconds.

  6. don't panic, it's just the end of the world by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's been known for a long time that Andromeda had a velocity towards the Milky Way (easily measured by its blue-shift), but no one could tell what its lateral velocity was, therefore whether it was going to actually collide or whether it was in an eccentric orbit. Actually measuring such a tiny side-shift, against more distant galaxies, of a source which is not actually a single defined object, where every part of it is in separate motion, in just 8 years, is pretty fucking impressive.

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    1. Re:don't panic, it's just the end of the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      In real-time?

      Did the computation really take 4 billion years?

    2. Re:don't panic, it's just the end of the world by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yep, it was written in Java.

      The first billion went while they were waiting for Eclipse to open.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  7. Re:And this is news how? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, just in time to warn our Great^12 Grandchildren.

    Maybe we could embed the message in some giant, black humming monolith, or something...

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  8. Oh no! Not the Galaxy! by Cyberllama · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's where I keep all my stuff!

  9. Re:And this is news how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    It's news because we didn't know if Andromeda and the Milky Way were orbiting each other or on a collision course without the transverse velocity of Andromeda. Now we know. Well, we think we know. It's going to be a little while until we can actually observe the outcome.

  10. AAAHHHHHH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    AAAAHHHHHHHHHH! *pause for breath* AAAAHHHHHHHHHH!

  11. Re:And this is news how? by auhsor · · Score: 2

    Like this submission?

  12. Re:Interesting timing by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 2

    It really brings home an appreciation for the human race. For all the wailing and gnashing of teeth about environmental damage we really are the only chance for earth based biodiversity to survive.

  13. Re:Expanding universe? by X0563511 · · Score: 2

    They gravitate towards each other. If their "ejection angle" was close enough for them to be flying mostly-parallel they would eventually pull into each other.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  14. whew! by swell · · Score: 2

    (wiping sweat from brow)
    I thought for a moment that TFA said 4 million years.
    Hey, 4 billion is a long time. No need to panic.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  15. Re:And this is news how? by Extremus · · Score: 4, Informative
  16. Re:And this is news how? by DurendalMac · · Score: 2

    This. I read this in an astronomy book a long time ago. Maybe now it's more certain, but really, this isn't big news.

  17. Re:Red Giant Sol? by toruonu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If after 3-4 billion years we're still stuck on this rock we deserve to burn up...

  18. Crossover by RivenAleem · · Score: 2

    Andromeda / Star Trek crossover, about time.

  19. Imagine by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Imagine how awesome the sky would look once Andromeda is near enough to dominate the view.

    Imagine how awesome the sky would look with two galaxies, one of them much larger than our own, sprawling around it.

    Imagine how such a view might affect the belief systems and cultures of all the advanced life forms that might be able to perceive it.

    Hopefully, I will be there, billions of years in the future, and be able to experience it.

    1. Re:Imagine by NormalVisual · · Score: 3, Informative

      Imagine how awesome the sky would look once Andromeda is near enough to dominate the view.

      Andromeda is already that big in the sky - it's over four times the size of the full Moon as seen from Earth right now. It's *extremely* diffuse though (and will continue to get more diffuse as it gets closer), so it's quite dim and generally isn't visible except from relatively dark sites.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    2. Re:Imagine by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 2

      Wow, I really didn't know that. I found this site showing an image with a nice size.

      It's quite amazing to think about how huge and close it is, to occupy such a relatively large portion of the sky. Too bad we can't appreciate it's splendor. I wonder if the view will improve as it gets closer. A poster above mentioned that it will get diffuser the closer it gets, but I wonder why.

  20. Re:Time stands still by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    We've always been on a collision course with Andromeda.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  21. Not an unexpected result by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Isolated clusters of galaxies (such as the local group) are expected to have low total angular momentum (basically because the initial condition has low angular momentum, and in the absence of large mass anisotropy nearby, there is nothing to change this.) The mass of the local group is dominated by Andromeda and us, and hence so is the angular momentum. If the us/Andromeda pair has low angular momentum about their centre of mass (and given the pair is gravitationally bound), they will both pass close to that centre of mass - i.e., they will collide.

    Of course, having an actual measurment is much more satisfying than having a theory.

    Also - although they can be spectacular from outside, galactic collisions aren't expected to have bad results for life living on their planets. The biggest effect is that colliding dust clouds trigger a burst of star formation, so the night sky will be pretty.

    It has been a few decades since I studied this, so I hope this is all accurate.

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    1. Re:Not an unexpected result by dkf · · Score: 2

      "galactic collisions aren't expected to have bad results for life living on their planets"

      oh look mom! that star is getting bigger, really quickly! uhhh, mom? uhhh.............x

      You underestimate just how big space is. You'd have to be very unlucky (astronomically so!) to be hit by a star passing through, or even to have one come close enough to significantly change the orbit of your planet. More likely is that some gas clouds will collide, which will trigger star formation from the increased density and shockwaves. That in turn is likely to increase the UV/X-Ray output of stars in the galaxy (because the formed stars are more likely to be big ones) and that might make things more hazardous. (It depends on how close we are to a star-forming region. Did I mention that space is big yet?)

      But its billions of years away. I think I'll recommend to skip the worrying for at least the duration of our civilization...

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  22. Re:And this is news how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Until now we did not know what kind of collision it would be.
    It could be a partial collision or even a near-collision.

    Now we know for sure it will be a head-on collision..

    That's news as far as me concerns...

  23. The Inhibitors already knew... by Coisiche · · Score: 2

    How come nobody's mentioned Alastair Reynold's Revelation Space series yet? Doesn't anyone here read SF?

    The fact that the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies will eventually collide is the motivation of the Inhibitors.

  24. Finally! by CyberK · · Score: 2

    At last, mankind will have a convenient and cheap way of intergalactic travel: Wait for it to come to us.

  25. Re:And this is news how? by Certhas · · Score: 2

    At the level of pop culture maybe it's not news. On the level of science it was not known 10-15 years ago. It was known that Andromeda was approaching the Milky way but there was no information on whether it would actually hit or whether we'd sling shot past each other and (potentially) go into orbit. A detail often glossed over in pop science books, and even some science books.

  26. Re:And this is news how? by buchner.johannes · · Score: 4, Informative

    The point is, people knew Andromeda was coming towards us at x km/s. But that is only the tangential component (towards us). It might have also flown at x km/s to the right at the same time, going 45 past us.

    Now people observed the speed of Andromeda on the sky (a painstaking measurement). As it turns out, Andromeda will not miss our Galaxy. That was kind of expected from the masses of galaxies in our local group -- Andromeda and the Milky Way have the same mass and are much larger than all the others, so they should attract each other most.

    --
    NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
  27. Re:order of magnitude by codemaster2b · · Score: 2

    I was going to challenge your assumptions about the nature of empty space in regards to collisions between large bodies. I was told in school that all matter consists largely of empty space. So I examined the common element iron:

    The diameter of the nucleus of an iron atom is 1.26e-8 cm. The standard atomic weight of iron is 55.845 (which is equivalent to 55.845 gm/6.022e23 atoms or 1gm/1.0783e22 atoms). The density of iron at room temperature is 7.874 gm/cm^3. So 1 cubic centimeter of iron weighs 7.874 grams, and contains 8.49e22 atoms. Assuming a cubed nucleus, and ignoring the relatively tiny electrons, each atom has a volume of 2.00e-24. Multiply by the number of atoms above and we should have a volume of 0.17cm^3. Note that a sphere occupies 52% of the volume of its enclosing cube, which would bring the estimate down to 0.089cm^3. So ultimately, solid iron is 9-17% protons and neutrons.

    It appears that while matter is more empty space than it is solid, the "emptiness" is only 1 order of magnitude, whereas your example was about 7. I retract any objections.

    --
    And over there we have the labyrinth guards. One always lies, one always tells the truth, and one stabs people who ask t
  28. I thought we were expanding??? by spiedrazer · · Score: 2

    OK, so if all matter came into being 14 Billion years ago in the big bang, and all space and the matter in it has been expanding since then, and new research shows that the universe will likely keep expanding as opposed to collapsing back in upon itself, how are two galaxies with the same approximate mass supposed to collide? Shouldn't we be getting further apart? I guess relatively close bodies of matter will continue to migrate towards each other even as the larger body of matter continues to expand, so matter will eventually be in larger clumps with more open space between them, but it still seems a bit counter-intuitive.

    --
    Keep passing the open windows...