Slashdot Mirror
Worst Companies At Protecting User Privacy: Skype, Verizon, Yahoo
First time accepted submitter SmartAboutThings writes "Apple and Microsoft are one of the worst companies at protecting our privacy, according to EFF's privacy report. Dropbox, Twitter and Sonic have some of the best scores." "Sonic" is California ISP Sonic.net, which tops the field with the EFF's only 4-star rating. Of ISPs with national presence, ATT and Comcast come in with a single star apiece, and Verizon gets a goose egg.
Nice to know that among the 1 ISP option you have, they have a 0-star rating in keeping information private. I'm not sure what anyone is supposed to do with this information.
Apple and Microsoft are one company now? What will they call it? Applesoft? Microple?
What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
First time accepted submitter SmartAboutThings writes
"Apple and Microsoft are one of the worst companies at protecting our privacy, according to EFF's privacy report. Dropbox, Twitter and Sonic have some of the best scores."
"Sonic" is California ISP Sonic.net, which tops the field with the EFF's only 4-star rating. Of ISPs with national presence, ATT and Comcast come in with a single star apiece, and Verizon gets a goose egg.
All shilling for Sonic aside, I'm pretty sure Apple and Microsoft are two companies.
Anyway, for real privacy we should become holders of the data.
Freenet is quite cool with privacy&anonimity (slow and high latency, but most private solution I know).
And Sone plugin offers anonymous "twitter" that can not be censored not tracked because
everyone holds the data [parts] mirrored on their p2p nodes,
and only YOU the publisher have the PRIVATE KEYs to your identity, same as with ssh or gpg
no one can confiscate that (especially when they can't find you - therefore the anonymity part,
problem, police-state?)
freenetproject.org and you see Sone plugin after installation on 1st page.
Beware - reduce storage size or use SSD or separated hard-drive to not experience slow-down of computer.
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!
The EFF is grading companies based on the following criteria (quoted verbatim):
1) Tell users about data demands: a public commitment to inform users when their data is sought by the government.
2) Be transparent about government requests: transparency about when and how often companies hand data to the government.
3) Fight for users’ privacy rights in the courts
4) Fight for users’ privacy in Congress
Criteria #1 and #2 might be important, but more for people who live at the edge of the law or might be suspected (possibly wrongly) of ties to terrorist groups than to the average citizen.
Criteria #3 and #4 are peripherally important to citizens but are tactically important to the EFF.
When I think about user privacy on the Internet, I think of the aggregation and analysis of data on each person (anonymously, or identified by name) based on tracking cookies, social networking and forum posts, location and call data, online and credit card purchase history, and other information obtained via Internet search. The four categories the EFF is analyzing would be far down on the list.
The EFF did nothing at all to consider privacy in general, and in particular with regards to businesses and other private entities. The chart is only about how the companies are interacting with governmental bodies (e.g. Congress, law enforcement). Facebook is widely regarded as being horrible when it comes to privacy, but it's because they keep abusing their access to everyone's information by sharing it with third-parties, using it to follow them around the Internet, and failing to follow the settings the user has indicated.
Even companies that have been more benign have problems. Dropbox, for instance, had a notable bug earlier this year or late last where anyone could access anyone else's account. Their employees also have access to everyone's data and can read it at any time unless you encrypt it yourself. Where is the consideration for those sorts of factors?
I'm far more concerned with companies sharing my information for profit than I am with companies sharing my information with the government. You can support privacy laws in Washington all you want, but when the rubber hits the road if you're selling me out for a quick buck, I don't want to be providing you with my information.
18 companies with 4 yes/no checks. Nothing about how the companies use collected user data or how they share it. Complete fail.
How can anyone call this a report?
The only reason Skype has a zero-score is because the EFF's criteria is inadequate. They're all contingent on these companies actually storing and using your data, neither of which Skype does. Skype actually takes it a step further and encrypts all communication. As far as I'm aware, Skype never sees your data, it's just a pipe.
Skype is ahead of all of these companies, as far as I'm concerned.
God help us. I'm pretty sure if Apple and Microsoft ever combined, the universe would explode.
They call it Craple.
Doctors do Massage in Longview WA now, who knew?
Maybe Applesoft will transition aqua to Metro on all the macs. Can you just imagine the look on the anal Mac users faces? Mass suicide
http://saveie6.com/
I know the article is meaningless, but sonic is just great.
I've never had a provider before who
- consistently answers the phone for tech support, and provides honest, useful advice and really address problems
- is willing to own issues with the local loop provider
- consistently ups my capacity and lowers my rate just because
- encourages me to run an open access point
- takes an unmitigated pro-consumer stand wrt net legislation at every opportunity
Why is the Google logo used as the icon for this article? Why not Apple or Microsoft?
No-one expected a defence of the Spanish Inquisition.
(There was one great thing about living before the late 20th century: the world had more than one religion, and you could always at least try to escape the hell around you. Now it's capitalism with a strong legal bias toward big business everywhere, so you either comply or you starve. Not much different than 500 years ago, then.)
You just know it would be rotten to the core.
Micrapple.
Cloud storage in general is useless when there are bandwidth caps, whether DFS or not. "Cloud storage" is only useful as an intermediary to share small amounts of files and that's it.
Nitpick: DFS=distributed file system. "DFS system" = distributed file system system
--
BMO
It is now that it's been used as a word.
-- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
there's something like dyslexia for full words?)
If I can ever get to where you change sigs (slashbugs keeping me out) my new sig is going to read "Illiterate? Write today for free help!"
Free Martian Whores!