Slashdot Mirror


Artist's Catcopter Causes a Stir

derekmead writes "I'm not sure that Dutch artist Bart Jansen had political commentary in mind when he created the Orvillecopter — combining a stuffed cat with a quadrotor, and naming it after Orville Wright — but indeed it's art, whose meaning will lie in the eye of the beholder. And for those that say stitching up a dead animal around the guts of a helicopter and flying it around is 'sick,' what of the massive drone industry, which, more than just producing a symbol, actually is creating flying death?"

37 of 360 comments (clear)

  1. Leather belt/jacket/shoes by br0ked · · Score: 5, Funny

    So of the people that are complaining, how many wear a leather belt, jacket or shoes?? For the record I think this is pretty cool and hope when I did they make me into a drone and fly me over all of my ex's houses on a regular basis....

    1. Re:Leather belt/jacket/shoes by cpu6502 · · Score: 4, Funny

      >>>So what confuses you here?

      Some politician somewhere will try to outlaw the stuffing of cats. (And then go stuff dead cow flesh into his mouth while he walks-round in dead cow skin.) It is confusing why some animals are protected & their killing outlawed, while other animals get murdered in the billions.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    2. Re:Leather belt/jacket/shoes by g0bshiTe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think it's funny because when the thing crashes it won't be a big deal. Cats always land on their feet.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    3. Re:Leather belt/jacket/shoes by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is because they might have consumed something making them unfit for food. No one knows what medicines or pollution those stray animals consumed. I also doubt that it would be worth it cost wise. The one off butchering of such an animal would probably cost more than buying commercial meat for the starving. I know that when I have an animal butchered after hunting or when my family buys live animals and has them slaughtered and butchered the cost just for that service is often more than the cost of low quality meat at the market.

    4. Re:Leather belt/jacket/shoes by Sperbels · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is confusing why some animals are protected & their killing outlawed,

      It's really no more complicated than this: Cute animals are protected. They're protected because people get outraged when an animal with an attractive face is harmed, and a politician can create a law protecting them and get some votes. That's all there is too it.

    5. Re:Leather belt/jacket/shoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, you fail. It was both roadkill and the artists beloved pet. It was his pet cat, he had it for several years, then it got hit by a car and died, then he turned it into an RC copter. The article from TFS only mentions "roadkill" while not commenting on the pet status, though the articles it links to explicitly mention that it was his cat.

    6. Re:Leather belt/jacket/shoes by LordLucless · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your law may differ, but AFAIK, the law in my country doesn't discriminate based on cuteness on animal. It's illegal to kill certain species because they are endangered. It's illegal to kill animals that belong to another person. It's illegal to kill any animal in painful or inhumane way, or to deliberately injure any animal without good reason.

      There might be more public outrage or political posturing when it's a cute penguin that gets kicked to death, but the law doesn't distinguish between animals on that basis.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    7. Re:Leather belt/jacket/shoes by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, according to PETA you must not eat the animals, or use their fur, or skin, only kill them and trash the bodies making sure it is a complete waste of an animal's life and corpse.

      PETA is the same group that tries to make it seem like my well-fed, mostly-indoor, spoiled-to-hell pets are enslaved. Obviously whoever came up with that concept has never belonged to a cat.

      Every time I come across that particular group of terrorists (yes, they are terrorists), I make it a point to outline my wife's plan to turn our 2 cats into a pair of mittens and socks, respectively, once they pass away.

      Seriously, I do that. Fuckers hate me, and the feeling is mutual.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    8. Re:Leather belt/jacket/shoes by flyneye · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Think of the historical uses of dead animals. Battlewear skull helms. Femur clubs, jawbone clubs.Costumery to frighten the opponent in battle. Clothes, tools, fertilizer,food,games, the dead animal has been with us through war and peace throughout the ages. Let's hope that artists like Jansen or Survival Research Laboratories continue to show the world the value of recycling ANY dead animal. In the media we have Disney propaganda that involves a cartoon armadillo recently run over, yet able to talk. The Beverly Hillbillies ate grannys "road kill stew" and look how Ellie Mae and Jethro turned out! In the beautiful work of art " Un Chien Andalou" by Dali and Bunuel, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xH2PV_S4QI we see manifestation of Dalis obsession with rotting asses, which appear in later paintings and sketches. Let us celebrate dead animals and teach the children the fascination and value of lifes end product.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    9. Re:Leather belt/jacket/shoes by ghn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I "free" my cat every eff'ing morning and guess what, that stupid slave just comes back all the time. What a stupid slave, doesn't even understand he can just run away and go free. I understand your PETA point in the scope of farm animals.. but cats? really? I am the cat's stupid slave, trust me..

  2. I can't decide... by eagee · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is cat-copter adorable, or disturbing?

    1. Re:I can't decide... by spidercoz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Didn't realize the dead have feelings with which to empathize. And since when has humanity possessed any respect for life? Only when it serves an agenda.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
    2. Re:I can't decide... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Extermely disturbing to birds. To cats, the stuff of dreams.

    3. Re:I can't decide... by Megane · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's adorasturbing. I think it's important to know that the cat died a natural death and that the decision was made afterward. Now the cat can continue to chase birds after death. And the determined look on its face is rather awesome.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    4. Re:I can't decide... by darkshadow88 · · Score: 5, Funny

      If one cannot give a corpse a higher purpose, then it's best to leave it alone.

      The catcopter does give the corpse a higher purpose--about 5 feet in the picture and probably much higher if taken outside.

    5. Re:I can't decide... by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think "adorasturbing" would be if a regular old cat crashed into a regular old copter, and this abomination happened. At best, this is only awwwstonishing.

  3. Time to update the book by operagost · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess there are now 102 uses for a dead cat.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  4. Re:heavy by QuasiSteve · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why is it that these UAVs are always naked?

    Because in general you want to avoid putting on extra unneeded weight.

    Do it right and it might help flight in moving air (since the air would just pass around, instead of pushing against the components)

    The airstream from the rotors itself already hits barely anything (i.e. the struts). I'd guess you could get some better airflow depending on the shape of those struts, but adding a skin between the struts wouldn't help much..in fact, it would make it easier for the wind to 'catch' it.

    Toy quadcopters that you can get off-the-shelf for cheap (but usually have poor gyros and are too small to handle themselves in even a slight breeze) do typically have more of a a body, though.

  5. Respect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is not very respectful to take a dead animal and put it on a quadcopter.

    Its a lot more respectful to put the thing in the dirt where you may potentially drive over it time and time again. I mean, thats how it died and I am sure it died doing what it loved.

    Its freaking dead. For all I care he catapulted it into the moon. Its not like he killed it to make his quadcopter skin. People are fucking retarded.

  6. You don't "get" art, do you? by MrEricSir · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The commentary IS the art. To leave out the commentary would be to miss the entire point.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  7. Re:Ceiling cat is watching you first post. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Funny

    A flying zombie kitty? Does it spew guns from it's mouth while giving out helpful life advice?

    No, but it does have a rainbow streamer and a really, really annoying theme song.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  8. Hilarious by ifrag · · Score: 4, Funny

    Almost had to LOL just looking at the pictures. This idea is great, he should make an entire series of dead animal RC vehicles. And then have some kind of epic death match crashing them into each other.

    --
    Fear is the mind killer.
  9. Re:It aint RIGHT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Should have used a live cat instead, that would be much more tasteful.

    Personally I don't see any difference between this and what Damian Hurst produces (It's not for everyone I suppose), except that this flies, which is cool :-)

  10. Re:So how many lives do drones save? by ravenshrike · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From the perspective of all the Japanese citizens that survived vs would have been killed in the course of invasion or even just a sustained firebombing campaign over all of Japan's major cities. the nukes were also a good idea.

  11. Missed opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I know he was going for tying in the outrage of the cat with the flying drone thing, but he missed a brilliant opportunity to use a small pig instead.

  12. Disrespectful to death you mean surely ? by aepervius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I dunno. I respect life and so forth, but once my pet are dead, or i am dead, who cares ? A corpse is a dead heap of rotting protein and has no intrinsic empathic value. People when they visit tomb in a cemetery are rarely visiting the corpse, but rather re-visiting the memory of the person, working on their grief. At least he found a value to his dead pet : big fat advertising.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:Disrespectful to death you mean surely ? by SirSlud · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Who said it's a toy? Considering the discussion it has fostered, the catcopter has certainly served a higher purpose than it would have had it just been stuck in the ground.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
  13. What I really want to do... by judoguy · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... is fly this thing around, meaning above, a dog kennel. Every dog who has terrorized a cat will panic big time. The rest will go nuts trying to leap up high enough to get the damn flying kittie.

    --
    Peace is easy to achieve, just surrender. Liberty is much harder get/keep.
  14. Sorry, it has to be asked by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 5, Funny

    I CAN HAS LANDING CLEERANS?

  15. no, not funny at all, in any manner by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Funny

    dear god help me, there's a guy running a leafblower outside my office while I look at those damn pictures!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  16. Re:art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you want to comment on something from TFS, make a new comment, don't reply to the first, completely unrelated comment. It's obnoxious and it completely destroys the flow of conversation.

  17. Now We Know... by 3seas · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...what happened to Schrodinger's cat

  18. Re:Enough with the commentary by Arker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    using man-made tools to go after people who have expressed in both word and deed they want to kill us.

    You mean people like Tariq Aziz and his 12 year old cousin? There is no evidence that they expressed any such wish at any point. Wouldnt be surprising if their families feel that way now, though.

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  19. try another article for some perspective by liquidsin · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2154283/Cats-away-Artist-turns-dead-pet-flying-helicopter-killed-car.html?ITO=1490

    this isn't some mad scientist-type murdering strays to build controversial art. this is an artist who taxidermied his pet after it was hit and killed by a car. the cat was already named 'orville' and the artist thought it befitting to send his pet to play with the birds it so loved in life. the article posted with the /. story tells none of the real info and offers only inflammatory and barely-relevant commentary.

    --
    do not read this line twice.
  20. Re:art? by Nadaka · · Score: 4, Funny

    The only thing in the eye of the beholder is charm, death, fear, telekinesis, serious wounds, and anti-magic.

  21. Re:art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You really can't grasp the meaning of that? It means they recommend participating in existing threads rather than starting new ones, not to post off-topic messages to other thread.

    That's pretty sad coming from a 5 digit uid. You should know better by now.

    Also keep in mind, there is no -1, Incorrect for a reason.

  22. Re:actually... by flyneye · · Score: 4, Informative

    O.K. then, I'll pick the ball back up and run by pointing out PRIOR ART. http://srl.org/machines/oldmachines/rabotrecent.jpg The folks over at Survival Research Laboratories added dead animals to machines for entertainment decades ago. http://srl.org/machines.html shows us some of their robotic triumphs. But before you write it off as geek driven entertainment, check out their R&D. http://www.srl.org/lab.html . Really deserves a story of it's own on /. as these are definitely Supergeeks deluxe with a rich history. http://www.srl.org/

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!