Slashdot Mirror


Canadian IP Lobby Calls For ACTA, SOPA & Warrantless Search

An anonymous reader writes "The Canadian intellectual property's lead lobby group, the Canadian IP Council (which represent the music, movie, software and pharma industries) released a new policy document (PDF) yesterday that identifies its legislative priorities for the coming years. Anyone hoping that the SOPA protests, the European backlash against ACTA, and the imminent passage of Canadian copyright reform might moderate the lobby group demands will be sorely disappointed. Michael Geist says it is the most extremist IP policy document ever released in Canada, calling for the implementation of ACTA, SOPA-style rules including website blocking and stopping search queries from resolving, liability for advertisers and payment companies, massive surveillance at the border and through delivery channels including searching through individual packages without court oversight, and spending hundreds of millions of tax dollars on private enforcement." Reader Bloozguy adds more legislative bad news for Canadians: Bill C30, the country's much-maligned warrantless internet surveillance bill, is coming back with new provisions that would give the U.S. government access to Canadian citizens' private data.

18 of 129 comments (clear)

  1. WTF?!!? by zero.kalvin · · Score: 5, Funny

    The only reaction I have if Fuck you! Why don't they install chips in our asses as well to see if we accidentally farted a theme song! What a bunch of idiots!

    1. Re:WTF?!!? by gman003 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wouldn't a better idea be just *not* *electing* baby-eaters to Parliament?

    2. Re:WTF?!!? by snowraver1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is why, I think that you should be able to vote for no one. I would rather have an empty chair represent me than most of the crooks currenly in office.

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
  2. Who needs... by MitchDev · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... Al Qaeda when you have the US and Canadian Governments?

    1. Re:Who needs... by dubbreak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well it's a lobby group, so you have to look for the source of the funding.

      I really think there need to be tighter laws on funding lobbyists (preferable it weren't legal, but that's never going to happen). How much of the money funding this group is foreign? It's one thing having Canadian companies spend money to have their political views "better heard" and completely different if this is being funded by outside (e.g. US) sources. Another country should not be able to shape our laws and legislation. It's bad enough companies within our country can push their agendas via money, but at least (if they are Canadian owed) it's Canadian agendas. The whole IP reform does not seem Canadian.

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
  3. Canadian tax payers demand representation for tax by aristotle-dude · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the government insists on collecting income tax and sales tax from me then I demand that they start representing me. Here is what I want them to say to the Canadian IP Council: GTFO.

    I not only pay my taxes but I buy music and TV shows from iTunes. However, I have no interest in seem more laws. I want smaller government, not a larger welfare state for the corporations or individuals. Corporations should be forced to use civil courts for their grievances for copyright. It should be considered breach of contract or license and not a criminal act.

    Stop using my tax money for your crap.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  4. Probably unlikely by MrKevvy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The majority Conservatives already dropped all of these provisions from C-11 as they're highly unpopular. Recent polls are now in the news showing that the New Democrats are tied with them, and may even be slightly leading. I really doubt they will back this and risk the next election over it.

    --
    -- Insert witty one-liner here. --
    1. Re:Probably unlikely by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not if we kill 13 of them. Then they lose their majority and force another election.

      If I'm going to spend the rest of my life in prison, it sure as fuck will be for a real crime.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  5. One year of Harper by msobkow · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is the damage done by one year of Harper.

    We've three more years of hell before we'll be rid of him, even though his government is illegitimate and does not have a real majority because of the robocall scandal.

    Living under a fascist government sucks royally when their ideals for the nation are your worst nightmares.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:One year of Harper by SteveFoerster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Kind of sucks when Americans can't even say, "That's it, I'm moving to Canada!"

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    2. Re:One year of Harper by fluffythedestroyer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, the whole province (lets say more than 80%...) voted for Jack Layton and Ontario which was around 50% for NPD and conserv party aren't to blame in this. It's rather the "west side" of Canada that is to blame if we got these kinds of lay because they mostly voted for the conservative party. Steven Harper showed the whole country you don't need Quebec to get the majority in the Gov. And everyone knows what happens if Steven Harper had the majority in the gov. He can do what he wants without any questions asked...well a lot less trouble if he would be in a minor gov. So it's Canadian's problem if we got those type of laws.

      Since I live in Quebec, I don't even consider myself a Canadian because of my views with Harper and his evil minions. Besides, most western province don't like us for very good reasons anyone...and i don't blame them too. My province is not run properly so we ask more than we give and were stuck with Canada for now.

    3. Re:One year of Harper by camperdave · · Score: 3, Funny

      Kind of sucks when Americans can't even say, "That's it, I'm moving to Canada!"

      But... We're only doing this to make you feel more at home!

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  6. The Tree of Liberty by cpu6502 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "From time to time the Tree of Liberty must be watered with the blood of patriots and tyrants. Civil disobedience is its nature manure." - Thomas Jefferson, 1790s. Of course what Jefferson ACTUALLY did was to form a new party called the Democrat-Republicans, and takeover the government in 1800. They dominated politics for the next three decades. WE need to take back our government(s) in Canada, the EU and the US.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    1. Re:The Tree of Liberty by tbannist · · Score: 3, Informative

      Is that a trick question? Mulcair, Rae or May would probably be better than Harper. I'm not particularly fond of the NDP, Liberals or Green party, each party has it's own problems. However, I detest the Conservative Party. The CPC is engaged in a grand enterprise to dismantle Canadian society for the benefit of resource extraction companies.

      Harper's conservatives fire or muzzle scientists to hide inconvenient facts, lie about nearly everything, are under investigation for vote fraud, and have been convicted of money laundering during elections. They have taken the mechanisms of Parliament and turned them into instruments to wage war against the other political parties and the people who support them. They seem incapable of seeing government as anything other than a war of "us versus them". The Canadian government hasn't always been that way, Harper and cronies just keep seeming to find new lows to sink to.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
  7. Re:Canadian tax payers demand representation for t by FriendlyLurker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well if there was any sort of meaningful political and economic consequence for representing private interests at societies general expense, then this behaviour might stop. But as it is, the same two parties representing slightly different business interests flip in and out of power as they screw up the living standards further, while retired politicians go on to make millions from their time in power. This is not just a Canada/US phenomena, and big mainstream media keeps us all fearful and voting for the same clowns time and again. Sigh.

  8. Do While... by mk1004 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a war of attrition: 1) A bill is submitted, public outrage ensues, legislators back off support, the bill dies. 2) A new, slightly different bill is submitted. 3) . Goto 1. Oops, forgot to put in the "public finally gets tired of hearing about it, less and less outrage, a bill finally passes" exit from the loop. Lobbyists never quit.

    --
    I can mend the break of day, heal a broken heart, and provide temporary relief to nymphomaniacs.
    1. Re:Do While... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 3, Insightful

      An effective strategy. It goes hand-in-hand with the overreaching approach of lobbying for something completly unrealistic in order to achieve a lesser but similar goal.

  9. Re:Let me say sorry for your predicament. by Lucky75 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We've always understood your predicament. That's why Canadians cared so much about SOPA and DMCA, because as soon as it happens there, the same lobby will try up here.

    --
    DNA -- National Dyslexic Association