Slashdot Mirror


Banking On Your Personal Online Data

snydeq writes "While privacy groups are working to lock away your personal data, a better — or perhaps supplementary — option may be to let you sell it for what it's really worth. 'Whether it's Facebook, Twitter, Google Drive, or Pinterest, the truth is the product is you — all that data about you used to target ads and sales pitches. It's hardly a new business model — it's how trade publications have made their money for decades — but in the online world all that information is easily stolen, traded, and spread. ... If the data has value — and we know it does — its creators (you and me) should be paid for it. And if we take over the selling of our data, all those companies using it now have to respect us and abide by our standards.'"

106 comments

  1. um, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And if we take over the selling of our data, all those companies using it now have to respect us and abide by our standards.

    Uh, no they don't. This isn't magicalhippieland.

    1. Re:um, no by Brucelet · · Score: 1

      Seconded. The idea of them playing by our rules is almost as laughable as us playing by theirs.

    2. Re:um, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides which, last estimate I read is that the average user's online data is worth something like $7.

      You can't "vote with your dollars" unless 100,000 of you do.

    3. Re:um, no by causality · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Seconded. The idea of them playing by our rules is almost as laughable as us playing by theirs.

      Indeed. The idea that they will "respect us" is absurd. In their minds they have already stripped us of all humanity and made us into a dollar-denominated commodity just like so much furniture or livestock. This alienated, dehumanizing system which presupposes that anyone other than me should decide what my needs and wants are constitutes my major philosophical problem with the whole concept of marketing. That, plus the fact that no one has asked me if I consent to be tracked and marketed to, and my consent is assumed by default and this is a violation, is the minor philosophical reason why I block all ads from all sites.

      The major practical reason is that my data obviously has value to various companies, yet those companies have never approached me with a contract or other offer -- meanwhile they would call it "theft" if I took their properties (intellectual or material) without compensating them. This is garden-variety hypocrisy in an unusually obvious form. The minor practical reason is that advertising is the most biased source of information imaginable and therefore not good enough for me if I were actually making a purchasing decision.

      What these people do respect is scarcity. Even if it's artificial (like all intellectual property). The only way to create that is to have more and more informed users who know how the game is played well enough to understand how to stop playing it if they so choose. If an IP address is the most personal information of yours they can obtain, you're doing it correctly.


      As an aside, these "My Clean PC" morons? Even if I had a desire or a need that this product could satisfy (which I don't), the way they keep spamming where they are unwelcome would tell me everything I need to know about who they are and what kind of business dealings I could expect from them. They obviously subscribe to the "loud and annoying = sales!" school of marketing. That school needs to go extinct like all the rest of the dinosaurs, along with the idiotic people who reward it with money at the expense of themselves and everyone who has to deal with spam.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    4. Re:um, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I swear that MyCleanPC [2girls1cup.nl] is a piece of shit, MyCleanPC [2girls1cup.nl] smells so bad that even shit smells better.

      Nothing but MyCleanPC [2girls1cup.nl] can claim the first prize for the most lousiest piece of crap ever created.

      I repeat, MyCleanPC [2girls1cup.nl] is a piece of crap !!!

      And I am not kidding !!

      MyCleanPC [2girls1cup.nl] is really really a lousy fucking piece of crap !!

    5. Re:um, no by bky1701 · · Score: 1

      MyCleanPC [2girls1cup.nl]

      You haven't QUITE gotten the point of what others were doing, I am afraid. It is supposed to actually be a link, you see...

    6. Re:um, no by inasity_rules · · Score: 1

      Offtopic - mydirtypc: If you go to the Privacy Policy link on their site, they give you a link to the Better Business Bureau. Here I guess many many people could lodge many many complaints. I was honestly just looking for the support email so I could sign them up for bestiality pr0n....

      Ontopic: I don't care much what people do with the data I post online. It is worth $0.00 to me, and not all of it is accurate anyway. If it did have value, I would not post it. Why the fuss? If someone can make money out of it, well, good for them. But I never click on adverts...

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    7. Re:um, no by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The Do Not Call list was a standard set out by society which all US companies must follow and which your agents enforce with what seems like considerable success. Don't think you are powerless, you can still make and enforce the rules.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:um, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Unless poster has some magical way to keep "those dirty bastards" from taking our information and doing what they want, you are not going to make dime one trying to sell it.

      This model has not worked out too well for Music, Books, Video, etc and that is an actual grouping of bytes created with the intent of selling for money.

    9. Re:um, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IANAL, but you can't in general (it may depend on your jurisdiction) copyright facts, which is what your personal data will consist of.

    10. Re:um, no by RDBinns · · Score: 1

      It depends on what you mean by 'data'. If it's a significant chunk of creative text that you've put into a platform (i.e. a facebook blog post), this could be copyrighted (subject to facebook's policy). If its a list of pages visited, facebook friends, search queries, log-ins, etc - none of this is copyrightable. However, in the EU, you can get database rights, which could perhaps cover the latter kind of personal data. But IMO would be infeasible for individuals to gain database rights over their personal datasets - for one thing, unlike copyright, its quite a costly process to obtain them.

  2. If the data has value... by John+Hasler · · Score: 2

    ...its creators ... should be paid for it.

    So you think you should pay for data created by businesses (eg, football scores, integrated circuit pinouts, instruction sets, financial statements)? You believe in copyright on information and data rather than just on creative expression?

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:If the data has value... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called rel="nofollow" you idiot spammers. Why would a slashdotter even use that shit...

    2. Re:If the data has value... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I soddomly swear that MyCleanPC is a piece of shit, MyCleanPC smells so bad that even shit smells better.

      Nothing but MyCleanPC can claim the first prize for the most lousiest piece of crap ever created.

      I repeat, MyCleanPC is a piece of crap !!!

      And I am not kidding !!
       

    3. Re:If the data has value... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I swear that MyCleanPC [2girls1cup.nl] is a piece of shit, MyCleanPC [2girls1cup.nl] smells so bad that even shit smells better.

      Nothing but MyCleanPC [2girls1cup.nl] can claim the first prize for the most lousiest piece of crap ever created.

      I repeat, MyCleanPC [2girls1cup.nl] is a piece of crap !!!

      And I am not kidding !!

      M

    4. Re:If the data has value... by Seumas · · Score: 2

      Exactly. I am no more the creator of data about myself that my bank and medical provider has than a tree is the creator of a painting I made of it. We are the subject of our data; not its creators. And while we should have control over it, the fact is that we don't and never will. Further, the idea that we should have the right to buy and sell it is silly. The value of your PRIVACY is far more important than the $10/yr you could get in the value of your DATA.

    5. Re:If the data has value... by TechnoJoe · · Score: 0

      If the data has value, it's creators should be paid for it.

      Physicists should pay God?

  3. yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sounds like those pre dotcom bubble firms who allegedly would pay you to surf the web. Of course it didn't work then and it won't work now.

  4. You already do sell it. by gallondr00nk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When you sign up for these services, you're already tendering your personal information. The agreement is "you let me use this service, and I'll provide you with X information." Yes, it isn't an explicit agreement, but we all know how this works now.

    Like any commodity, your price is set by demand. Saying you want to sell your information for cash is fine, but when the price is already set by the fact there are millions of others signing up to the service for free then your bargaining posture is pretty weak.

    1. Re:You already do sell it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's like the man telling his wife "when you married me, I let you use my income and you have sex with me whenever I like, yes it isn't an explicit agreement, but we all know how this works now."

      No. Invasion of privacy is a form of rape and there should be a law that companies shouldn't ask for personal information unless absolutely needed and should definitely not share it with others.

      That's my point of view and that of many others, this article says there should be an exception where we can sell our privacy. I say that's fine as long as people can also charge for sex.

    2. Re:You already do sell it. by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When you sign up for these services, you're already tendering your personal information. The agreement is "you let me use this service, and I'll provide you with X information." Yes, it isn't an explicit agreement, but we all know how this works now.

      You missed the point of the article. We are selling it now, but the market is ridiculously primitive. It is all take-it-or-leave-it, no options for negotiation and basically no transparency. For all intents and purposes we've replaced cash with personal information as the currency of online services.

      But where everybody pretty much knows the value of a dollar, few, if any, people have much of a grip on the value of their personal information. We know what it is, but we have no idea of what it can be used for in the hands of the people we trade it to. So essentially we are writing blank checks to pay for things like facebook and google.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:You already do sell it. by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      And as I didn't sign up for the services and don't use them, I'm supposed to feel somehow protected.

      But not only do I have to use Ghostery or a similar script killer, but I can't really use google and a wide variety of services.

      Those that choose to be tracked and thrown into the hadoop mosh pit get what they deserve. It's not a quid pro quo. It's you let them do you for free, or you get money (or consideration for it) or you simply flip the bird and walk away. So I walk away.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    4. Re:You already do sell it. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Well would you and everyones' brother be willing to pay $5 a month to use Facebook?

      The answer would be hell no. People just are so used to annoying ads they do not care. Look at slashdot as an example? You can pay a tiny monthly fee to browser slashdot ad free. It is not that Cmd Taco (I believe he quit) is evil. It is that is costs money to host this site and have the people who work on it fulltime feed. The internet is not as free as it once was with telecom giants buying all the last mile wires and someone has to pay the bills.

      People do put value and prefer ads otherwise 80% of us would actually pay to browse in which we choose not too. Facebook does make money from its ads. About 1 billion in revenue every year! It sure as hell not worth $100 billion. Advertising is a very lucrative market and industries like automotive are willing to include 1/3 the price of your car just towards advertising alone!

    5. Re:You already do sell it. by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Well would you and everyones' brother be willing to pay $5 a month to use Facebook?

      You missed the point of my post. This is not about paying cash versus paying with personal information. This is about properly valuing personal information.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    6. Re:You already do sell it. by pepty · · Score: 1

      You missed the point of the article. We are selling it now, but the market is ridiculously primitive. It is all take-it-or-leave-it, no options for negotiation and basically no transparency. For all intents and purposes we've replaced cash with personal information as the currency of online services

      What I don't get is how outfits like Personal.com that claim to provide a way to control and sell your information have any more control of your data than you do. Google still has your data. Facebook still has your data. Your ISP, Amazon, Yahoo, and every other site you visit and the third parties they contract with still have your data, and they still sell, use, and package it however they want.

    7. Re:You already do sell it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The internet is not as free as it once was with telecom giants buying all the last mile wires and someone has to pay the bills.

      It was never free - it just used to be the government (i.e. taxpayers) paying the bills. And it was a sort of libertarian playground for a while.

      The best and worst thing that ever happened to the Internet was its commercialization.

    8. Re:You already do sell it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I swear that MyCleanPC is a piece of shit, MyCleanPC smells so bad that even shit smells better.

      Nothing but MyCleanPC can claim the first prize for the most lousiest piece of crap ever created.

      I repeat, MyCleanPC is a piece of crap !!!

      And I am not kidding !!

    9. Re:You already do sell it. by DogDude · · Score: 1

      "No transparency"?

      Sure, there's transparency. There's total transparency. Everything you enter into your GMail account is property of Google. Everything you enter into your Facebook account is property of Facebook.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    10. Re:You already do sell it. by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3

      Sure, there's transparency. There's total transparency. Everything you enter into your GMail account is property of Google. Everything you enter into your Facebook account is property of Facebook.

      I think you just proved my point.

      A hell of a lot of more than that is collected about you. Every page with a facebook like button on it reports back to facebook that you browsed there. Same thing with all of those web pages that use googleapis.com - pages that you have no idea are ratting you out to google. And that is just the tip of the iceberg. Go install Ghostery to get a feel of just how much your online life is being spied on by companies you've never even heard of.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    11. Re:You already do sell it. by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      Plus its one of those things that the market has a hard time finding the correct value of. To Google it might be a couple of dollars, to me its more like ten grand a month.

    12. Re:You already do sell it. by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      Bingo. I don't use Facebook because it doesn't offer me anything I consider to be of equivalent value to my data (not to mention the fact that I don't like the way the company operates when it comes to privacy control). Google's services on the other hand, yes, they are worth it for me. So Google get my data, Facebook don't, Google makes a few cents from my data, Facebook doesn't get the "$800 per user/year" figure that's bandied about.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    13. Re:You already do sell it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facebook gets about $8/user per year, google gets $32. Wish I had a link for you, it was something I saw in the bazillion articles explaining facebook's IPO flopping.

    14. Re:You already do sell it. by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

      Well would you and everyones' brother be willing to pay $5 a month to use Facebook?

      The answer would be hell no. People just are so used to annoying ads they do not care. Look at slashdot as an example? You can pay a tiny monthly fee to browser slashdot ad free. It is not that Cmd Taco (I believe he quit) is evil. It is that is costs money to host this site and have the people who work on it fulltime feed. The internet is not as free as it once was with telecom giants buying all the last mile wires and someone has to pay the bills.

      People do put value and prefer ads otherwise 80% of us would actually pay to browse in which we choose not too. Facebook does make money from its ads. About 1 billion in revenue every year! It sure as hell not worth $100 billion. Advertising is a very lucrative market and industries like automotive are willing to include 1/3 the price of your car just towards advertising alone!

      Would those who do not use facebook, use it if they were paid $5 a month for the information they will inevitably give up? The question isnt how much people are willing to pay in order to not have their information used, but rather how much value their information is worth and how much business will pay u for it. Currently facebook is re-selling ur information and in return offering an online computer services via hardware and bandwidth for free. Its pretty obvious that they amount they pay in order to provide the service is far less then they get in return for selling ur information thru targetted advertising and other ways of selling demographic information to interested 3rd parties.

      Reality is that ur information is valuable and the return of value u get from companies like facebook who collect and make profit on it is far greater then the percentage they give back to u. Most people dont seem to really understand that the greatest monitary resource facebook has is u... and that without u, facebook is worth $0.

      I used to play zynga/facebook poker, until I discovered that there were bugs in the software. I thought they would fix these issues and I sent them specific emails to describe these errors in the game logic. After about a year of seeing changes in making the advertisements work better and better and no change in the game code, I realized that facebook/zynga doesnt care about a great user experience and only really cares about pleasing the advertiser and maximizing the profit of selling me to them. I stopped playing poker through facebook, but I think most facebook users must not even realize how valuable they are to facebook... or they would quit too. Because if this happened zynga/facebook would fix the actual game experience they use to entice users to be online in order to push advertising for profit.

  5. We are being paid already. by Superdarion · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But we are being paid for it. With google's services, for instance. Our product is our information and I think Google pays us handsomely for it with their search engine alone.

    1. Re:We are being paid already. by wannabgeek · · Score: 2

      Wrt search, Google is getting handsomely compensated for it by their search ads. So, we don't have to pay for it through our information. Our intent (which we disclose through the search term) is enough.

      --
      I'm much more funny, interesting and insightful than the moderators think
    2. Re:We are being paid already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paid, schmaid... were you compensated fairly, well or not!

  6. Sell? by devnullkac · · Score: 2

    Have we learned nothing from the evil corporate empires that feed us our culture in click-wrapped agreements? Don't sell your personal data... license it! And sue the bastards to death if they share it with anyone else!

    --
    What do you mean they cut the power? How can they cut the power, man? They're animals!
    1. Re:Sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a patent on licensing personal data. You'll be hearing from my lawyers soon.

    2. Re:Sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a patent on transmitting audible messages of a legal nature via lawyer.

      Let's talk.

  7. Commercialization makes online rights irrelevent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Our social space online has moved from the public square to the shopping mall.

    From the public sphere where we can fight for our rights and influence the laws and bylaws that govern our conduct, where we can engage in civil disobedience when we oppose the rules, to the private sphere, where we have no rights, and can be expelled and excluded at the pleasure of the private owners of the platforms.

    Today, if somebody is hosting content that somebody else objects to, that content is not likely to be hosted by a server they control, but rather by a commercial social platform. Such content can be removed with no due process, with no recognition of the rights and liberties of both parties, simply the unilaterally imposed rules of the platform operator.

    In the case that the content is controversial, and the objecting party is powerful, the operator has strong incentive to remove it, and very little incentive to put themselves at risk to keep the content online.

    The powerful interest that wish to control content online no longer need coersive laws to do so, they simply need co-operation from the platform owners. Such co-operation is happily provided by most operators, and is often even a precondition of their financing.

    Commercialization has made online rights irrelevant

    The world where “anyone, anywhere may express his or her beliefs, no matter how singular, without fear of being coerced into silence or conformity” can not exist on Facebook, and can not be built by capital."

    - @dmytri

  8. Be careful what you wish for by Tim+the+Gecko · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What are the two factors that make telephone companies stupid, evil and bureaucratic? Billing and regulation. With Facebook, Gmail, Flickr, etc., we've lucked into a world with no billing (advertising pays), and not too much regulation.

    snydeq's proposal seems to open the way to a world where the money flow takes on a life of its own (huge departments keeping track of who gets what), with an inevitable regulatory tidal wave sweeping in soon after the first agreement is signed.

    What would be scary is how little I may be valued. I'm not buying a car soon, I can't drink alcohol, and I am socially inept with zero spending on Cialis. It seems like the MLB should stop me watching the World Series for free.

    1. Re:Be careful what you wish for by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 1

      It seems like the MLB should stop me watching the World Series for free.

      The first hit is always free. Sure we'll give you some local stations for free so you get a taste for TV, then you can buy into cable to expand your experience. The interesting thing is that cable is something that should be free too, so the television stations get more revenue from their ads, and the cable company should get a cut from the ads. I think the demand for the average public to watch TV is too high, and this allows them to grill em on ads AND cable tv subscription.

    2. Re:Be careful what you wish for by RDBinns · · Score: 1

      I agree. Targeted advertising will eventually give way to targeted service quality. It's only so long before they realise that I never click on their ads. Apparently BT (UK telecoms provider) used to moniter who made the most/least calls. The most talkative people were deemed to be more important in spreading word-of-mouth, so received better customer service. Those who made less calls were deemed low-priority and received worse service.

  9. Wish I had mod points. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the bloody greatest advertising spam comment I've seen, ever.

    10/10, would read again.

    1. Re:Wish I had mod points. by mfnickster · · Score: 1

      I didn't like it. In fact, I threw my precious things across the room and broke them, then committed suicide.

      --
      "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
    2. Re:Wish I had mod points. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't like it. In fact, I threw my precious things across the room and broke them, then committed suicide.

      Been there, done that. Unfortunately in the pre Youtube days, and no one wanted to rent the video.

  10. Re:Anti SEO post by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Lets fuck up this SEO troll's game? If another slashdotters respond back to this troll with the following cut and pasted back all his potential customers will see 2 women eating shit and vomiting in each other's mouths. You all have my permission to cute and paste this. Obviously not work safe ...

    MyCleanPC is a shitty product! There is no crappier product than MyCleanPC.

    In actuality this will fuck up the SEO from this scam artist who wrote MYCleanPC.com and counters his slimy spamming advertising MyCleanPC .

    If everyone here on slashdot points to other disgusting sites for MyCleanPC, then people searching for malware virus removal with MyCleanPC will have an awful surprise! :-)

    If goatse was still around I would have used that sigh.

  11. Re:Anti SEO Post by Billly+Gates · · Score: 0, Troll

    Lets fuck up this SEO troll's game? If another slashdotters respond back to this troll with the following cut and pasted back all his potential customers will see 2 women eating shit and vomiting in each other's mouths. You all have my permission to cute and paste this. Obviously not work safe ...

    MyCleanPC is a shitty product! There is no crappier product than MyCleanPC.

    In actuality this will fuck up the SEO from this scam artist who wrote MYCleanPC.com and counters his slimy spamming advertising MyCleanPC .

    If everyone here on slashdot points to other disgusting sites for MyCleanPC, then people searching for malware virus removal with MyCleanPC will have an awful surprise! :-)

    If goatse was still around I would have used that sigh.

  12. Ignorance is NOT bliss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because you enter into an implicit agreement, doesn't mean you are getting a fair deal.

    What's 'your' data worth in the markets of the intertubes? How do I know I shouldn't have held out for more than access to so-called free services offered?

  13. Why buy it from you when they can steal it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'nuff said.

  14. Re:Anti SEO Post by Billly+Gates · · Score: 0

    Lets fuck up this SEO troll's game? If another slashdotters respond back to this troll with the following cut and pasted back all his potential customers will see 2 women eating shit and vomiting in each other's mouths. You all have my permission to cute and paste this. Obviously not work safe ...

    MyCleanPC is a shitty product! There is no crappier product than MyCleanPC.

    In actuality this will fuck up the SEO from this scam artist who wrote MYCleanPC.com and counters his slimy spamming advertising MyCleanPC .

    If everyone here on slashdot points to other disgusting sites for MyCleanPC, then people searching for malware virus removal with MyCleanPC will have an awful surprise! :-)

    If goatse was still around I would have used that sigh.

  15. Re:Anti SEO post by inode_buddha · · Score: 0

    goatse is now at goatse.info, just FYI

    --
    C|N>K
  16. Stop repeating that !! by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The guy's intention is to get as many mention of "mcpc" as possible to push it in front of SEO listing

    Do not repeat that "mcpc" !!

    Do not fall for his game !!!

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Stop repeating that !! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

      No the SEO is paying him to link to his site in reference to MyCleanPC for the actual url. The url is the key ingredient to get a top Google page rank without paying for it which this scam artist is trying to do.

      What will happen is if someone does a search for the key terms My clean pc, sucks, worst product ever, do not buy this, and then mcpc the link to the girls eating shit will show up.

      Obviously no slashdotter is going to click that so his audience is for Google readerbots. Also Google does rank things higher with the rel=no follow as scam artistis have caught on about the penalty of over doing SEO.

      So since I randomly picked that one lets keep it up! Or have whoever is in charge of slashdot since Timothy and CMD Taco left to simply ban all posts with that url. If what I read is true and it is scareware then these assholes should be in jail. How is MyCleanPC different than something evil like Anti Virus 2010 or MacDefender? The comments I read on youtube is it is impossible to uninstall or at least very hard making a rewipe the most viable solution for just casual PC users.

    2. Re:Stop repeating that !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So since I randomly picked that one lets keep it up! Or have whoever is in charge of slashdot since Timothy and CMD Taco left to simply ban all posts with that url.

      But what if i have something legitimate to say about MyCleanPC?

    3. Re:Stop repeating that !! by S.O.B. · · Score: 1

      Then just follow this link to MyCleanPC. After all, the only way to get the authentic MyCleanPC it to use the correct MyCleanPC website.

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
  17. Re:Anti SEO post by inode_buddha · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here's some even worse stuff... just in case you need ammo

    http://ftw.generation.no/?n=627
    http://www.zentastic.com/videos/bmevideo-trailer.wmv
    http://www.zentastic.com/videos/bmevideo-trailer-2.wmv
    http://www.zentastic.com/videos/bmevideo-3.wmv

    (genital dissection vids, prolapseing, gay group, etc.)
    Because I get *sick and tired* of forum spammers...

    --
    C|N>K
  18. You trade this information for content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Much of the content online is basically underwritten by display ad networks. Without serving ads these sites would need to charge directly to pay their authors and hosting fees.

  19. Cha-ching by girlintraining · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And if we take over the selling of our data, all those companies using it now have to respect us and abide by our standards.

    That's adorable. You think corporations respect you. Nothing could be further from the truth. You are a means to an end, nothing more. Specifically, money. They'll do anything for money, and since they have way more of it than you, it's you that will be going to them for everything, not the other way around. You want that cell phone? Surrender your personal data. Car? Personal data, please. Internet access? Groceries? Housing? Furniture?

    Capitalism without restraint leads to depotism.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Cha-ching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Capitalism without restraint leads to depotism."

      You're close. Capitalism without restraint leads to Home Depotism!

  20. The sad truth by virb67 · · Score: 1

    The saddest part about your personal information--your privacy--being bought and sold by third parties is that it is not, actually, worth very much. The way corporations like Google or Facebook make it worthwhile is they sell TENS OF MILLIONS of potential customers at a time. Even if one did take control of the market for their own personal info how much do you think you could make? A few cents a transaction maybe? A couple of bucks tops if you're in a really coveted demographic? The true amount is probably a fraction of a fraction of cent. Worth it?

  21. Re:Anti SEO post by EdIII · · Score: 3, Funny

    You forgot one thing...

    Installing MyCleanPC, and the subsequent ass-raping your PC will receive, is vastly more preferable than the mental-ass-raping you will receive by watching 2 girls 1 cup.

    Thank you very much. I had almost forgotten about that travesty on the net. Thanks for freshening up those wounds for me.

  22. Re:When my ass gets tickled, I rub dirt in my face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I swear that MyCleanPC is a piece of shit, MyCleanPC smells so bad that even shit smells better.

    Nothing but MyCleanPC can claim the first prize for the most lousiest piece of crap ever created.

    I repeat, MyCleanPC is a piece of crap !!!

    And I am not kidding !!

  23. Re:Anti SEO post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I swear that MyCleanPC is a piece of shit, MyCleanPC smells so bad that even shit smells better.

    Nothing but MyCleanPC can claim the first prize for the most lousiest piece of crap ever created.

    I repeat, MyCleanPC is a piece of crap !!!

    And I am not kidding !!

    MyCleanPC is really really a lousy fucking piece of crap !!

  24. We struck a bargain, they broke it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Take Facebook for example, we struck a bargain for their services, they then broke that bargain and reduced the privacy level. You get committed to a service like FB, and there is a penalty to you for leaving it. All that data, all those contacts were trusted with FB.

    So when FB screw you over, you have to bend over and take it.

    So it's not like a "service for loss of privacy" contract, it's more a scam-artist approach.

  25. Targeted Ads. by jhobbs · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'll happily share anything and everything advertisers want to know about me if I could ever just get ads that were relevant to me. As an example, Hulu gave me ads for diapers, Charter Cable Internet, and Gucci Cologne in the last show I watched. Charter isn't in my area, I hate kids (and I'm gay so the odds of an accidental one are near zero), and I buy unscented everything. Facebook's targeted ads are just as awful. I mean, its like no one wants my money. And with no wife or kids and my own business I have plenty of it to spend.

    1. Re:Targeted Ads. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and wtf are you even looking at ads for? adblock, ftw. and don't give me some moral bullshit about wanting to support sites like facebook and hulu by wanting relevant ads. anyone who says that is full of shit. nobody wants ads except people who make money on them... and then only when they're actually making money on the actual ad that's in front of them.

      1. Adblock can't block the ads on Hulu (unless it also blocks the show you want to watch).

      2. It's probably been a few years since I've seen one, but there is a kind of ad I would like to see, namely one announcing the availability of a product or service that I would buy if I could. For example, "[Your favorite author] has published a new book", or "[That Broadway show you wanted to see] is now playing in your city". Amazon used to have an email service that matched the first pattern and I actually subscribed to it.

    2. Re:Targeted Ads. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Targeted ads are a dumb idea.

      I play eve online and somehow that is known to a lot of websites, so I get a lot of advertisement for eve online, which I already play.

    3. Re:Targeted Ads. by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      That doesn't mean targeted ads are a bad idea. It means the advertisers are doing it wrong. Maybe they should be selling goods or services that are relevant to an Eve Online player instead.

      I suspect what's actually happening here is re-marketing. The problem is, the ad networks don't know you play Eve Online at all. How would they know that? They see that you have an interest in the topic, but for all they know, you might have been simply checking it out, or you might have been reading some reviews about it, or whatever, but they don't know you're actually a player. So they take a guess and show you an ad for it. This is still right more often than showing you a completely random ad, so they won't stop doing this. The fix is not to say "targeted ads suck", the fix is to allow even more targeted ads so you see ads for, I don't know, ISK sellers or something. But that requires trusted information brokers, which there is a lack of today.

    4. Re:Targeted Ads. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "near zero"? ok. so, no ramming some dude's poop chute, having another guy help himself to some sloppy seconds that later plows some chick without cleaning up first and getting her knocked up with your goop instead of his.

      There is probably less chance of that happening than winning the lottery, i.e. you could live 1000 lifetimes having promiscuous gay sex every week to reach appreciable odds of that happening, or in other words, "the odds of an accidental one are near zero", and pay specific attention to the qualifier "near".

    5. Re:Targeted Ads. by ffflala · · Score: 1

      Hulu at least does have an option to help them with ad customization. In the upper right corner of each ad is a dialog that reads "is this ad relevant to you? yes/no"

      Selecting "no" on the least relevant ads does seem to reduce them, though not immediately nor completely. I'm not sure what "yes" does, because personally I hate ads and don't want to encourage any of them.

    6. Re:Targeted Ads. by jhobbs · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, I have to watch on my computer to be able to provide that feedback. I generally only watch Hulu on my living room television. The only time my feedback ever changed the ads I received was when I wrote to them over the eHarmony ads I was receiving. I complained about the ads because I didn't want to see ads from a company with an anti-gay history(1,2,3). I will say, however, after I wrote, they responded promptly saying they would forward the complaint to marketing and I never saw the ads again. As far as clicking "No" on "Is this ad relevant to you?" I've watched a few shows on my computer with the specific intent on clicking "No" for the Charter Communications ads. At one point around half the ads I saw were for a cable company that doesn't even do business where I live.

      (1) http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1627585,00.html
      (2) http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/01/26/BAGB1BNUE5.DTL
      (3) http://mashable.com/2010/01/28/eharmony-lawsuit/

    7. Re:Targeted Ads. by jhobbs · · Score: 1

      As far as near zero, that's the mathematician in me, as statistically, it isn't an absolute impossibility, just extremely unlikely.
      As far as ads go, I do use AdBlock on my computer, I don't on my TV. And there is nothing wrong with ads if they show me something I would like to buy that maybe I didn't know about.

    8. Re:Targeted Ads. by ffflala · · Score: 1

      Ah, I don't have a separate television and I didn't realize you can't customize ads unless you were at a computer. I'd heard of the eHarmony anti-gay bigotry; I'd also heard that they reject atheists. Fuck that fucking company.

      Anyway I've had limited success with customizing Hulu ads. For example, about half of the ads I get are for car insurance and/or cars -- I haven't owned a car since 2006. Since car share services like car2go and Zipcar more than meet my car needs, and are cheaper, more reliable, and more convenient, I have no plans to buy a car.

      Still, the other half of the ads are usually blockbuster movie/game ads and the occasional tech/gear ad, which is about as accurate as I think they can get for me. While it is still widely off the mark most of the time, it is more accurately targeted than any other video ads I've yet to encounter.

      Your anecdote seems to indicate that feedback button for the ad customization might go a long way for them.

    9. Re:Targeted Ads. by jhobbs · · Score: 1

      I will say this, Hulu is a much better solution than Cable and a Tivo. I just wish they would put a little more effort into targeting ads. This probably has as much to do with the advertisers as anything. I'm sure after a half century of television advertising models, the advertisers till tag their ads as "Gender", "Region", "Time of day" or something similar. Perhaps as ad targeting evolves, both advertisers and media companies will relize the benefits of specific targeting.

      Instead of expensive blanket advertising, much cheaper limited run, very targeted ads could gain traction as lots of smaller companies can then afford to get a higher turn for dollars spent. The media companies could benefit from this as well, making money on volume instead of a few deep pocketed advertisers.

      It would stand to reason that this would make sense to the companies relying on advertising revenue as it would make them less susceptible to the whims of a few large clients.

  26. Re:Anti SEO post by AoM_Scott · · Score: 1

    Just a note, it looks like the links in the comments all have the rel="nofollow" attribute added, and therefore carry no weight in Google, and probably other search engines so unfortunately people searching for MyCleanPC won't get a nasty surprise!

  27. You're already being paid. by Bootsy+Collins · · Score: 1

    You're already being paid for your personal information.

    You're being paid with access to Farmville, or other Facebook features, or whatever.

    I thought this was obvious to everyone.

  28. Re:Anti SEO post by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Dude that can't be real! Holy crap!

    Do not give the trolls any idea.

  29. Re:Anti SEO post by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    I would rather watch 2 girls 1 cup than to have my holy computer ever subjected to such torture to that malware. I would have to rewipe it or do a restore and carefully go through the registry.

  30. That's such a visionary idea by martin-boundary · · Score: 2
    I for one welcome this idea, and I move to extend it to its logical conclusion. I *also* want to be able to sell my wife(1), my kids(2), and my kidneys(3) if I want to, too. It's too hard to think about enforcing all those arbitrary rules, let's just let the market decide(4)!

    1) The neighbour stups her already when I'm in the office, so there's a market. I should be compensated in money terms.

    2) There's that paedophile I see every day in the park, so there's a market. It's inevitable he'll grab my 7 year old anyway, I should be compensated in money terms.

    3) The rich old woman down the street really needs a kidney. She might just get lucky on the waiting list, so I want to get in on the action now. She'll pay anything!

    4) I really need the money! Honest!

    1. Re:That's such a visionary idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I *also* want to be able to sell my wife(1), my kids(2), and my kidneys(3) if I want to, too.

      I may believe you have 3 kidneys, and I'll even accept you have a wife. But no way a slashdotter has kids, you aren't fooling anyone virgin.

    2. Re:That's such a visionary idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you have the right to do as you wish with violating anyone else's right.

      this is the only law anyone truly cares about unless they're trying to fuck you over...

      so:

      1) she's not you
      2) they're not you
      3) now, i would agree, you should be able to do this, but good luck finding a doctor willing to break their hippocratic oath AND care about keeping you alive. so unless you have a death wish, this is out too i'm afraid (as they would have to violate your right).
      4) why? follow the law and everyone's happy ;)

  31. Personal questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... diapers, Charter Cable Internet, and Gucci Cologne ...

    But targeted ads mean you are seeking some answer to which they can suggest a product. By passively watching the TV you are only saying that you are not able to do anything better with your time. Remember, at the very least, Hulu is being paid to show those products at a specific time. Usually because a majority demographic is watching at that time. That you do not have the problems of child-support and monogamy makes you a minority demographic. Lastly, can you spend your money on a round-the-world cruise? Being self-employed means travel and extended holidays are inconvenient recreations.

    1. Re:Personal questions by jhobbs · · Score: 1

      Why does everyone assume that because you are gay your are promiscuous?
      You are correct on travel. Fortunately I love what I do and never really crave a vacation to get away from it.
      All that said, what's wrong with wanting to see ads for things I would like to buy? (e.g. Electronics, Cars, Food, Appliances, Furniture, or anything for my dog.)

  32. Re:Anti SEO post by inode_buddha · · Score: 2

    Actually yes it is real. There is worse stuf than goatse and tubgirl out there. Never mind the trolls, I say (I can deal with that) its the spammers that *really* annoy me tho.... those links are great for google-bombs and totally fuckup their results. Especially if you can redirect their paypal button to one of them..

    --
    C|N>K
  33. Re: by moneybabylon · · Score: 0

    Won't work. Data wants to be free.

  34. You DO get paid for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You get paid for it by getting those services for free. When is the last time you gave Facebook or Google money?

  35. Copyright your SSN + name combination. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    Then sue anyone reporting bad credit history about you. Profit!!!

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  36. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  37. It's a meme, guys... by beaverdownunder · · Score: 1

    Nobody from 'MyCleanPC' is posting this crap, it's just a stupid meme. So posting links to disgusting shit in an attempt to 'fight it' just encourages it.

    It's basically just the new version of Frost Piss. Sad you lot haven't gotten that by now...

  38. No no no by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    You don't SELL your personal information. You LICENSE it and charge for yearly updates.

    Plus it comes with DRM that requires you to be logged into my server while you use it.

    And the whole process is patented.

  39. LAWL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTA: "...And if we take over the selling of our data, all those companies using it now have to respect us and abide by our standards.'"

    Give me an R! GIVE ME AN O! GIVE ME AN F! GIVE ME AN L!

    ROFL!!!!!!!!!

  40. Billly Gates - Troll-Feeder Extraordinaire by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Of course, you're *absolutely*, 100%, would-stake-your-life-on-it confident that this *isn't* a Joe job or- far more likely IMHO- just a troll?

    And you're *entirely* confident that "FloppyCockyJohnson" (what a PR-friendly name *cough*) is a plausible legitimate spammer, despite being happy to waste her time posting spam links that do nothing, due to the fact that Slashdot adds a nofollow to them all?

    Of course, when you say that "the SEO is paying him to link to his site" you know this for a *fact*...?

    Because only an arrogant and self-righteous but deluded idiot on a feelgood crusade would clutter Slashdot up with replies that are way more annoying and disruptive than the original offtopic post unless they knew for sure- in the face of commonsense evidence- that the OP was a genuine spammer.

    Normally I don't waste time feeding the trolls, nor pandering to the idiots that feed them by replying. I quickly mod the lot of you down en masse if I have points, then skip the lot. However, your account pops up like clockwork to respond to virtually every instance of this pretend spam.

    Bottom line is that you- and your taken-it-upon-youself crusade to take "revenge" on this troll masquerading as a spammer are way more disruptive than the original troll itself.

    I have more respect for the original troll than you. At least they're achieving what they set out to achieve. You? You're a useful idiot.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  41. Re:Anti SEO post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for each spam post here, i will add a 2g1c post with cmpc links on a real website.