Slashdot Mirror


Google Touts Worker Tracking As Own CEO Goes MIA

theodp writes "On Thursday, Google announced a product that enables a business to see where all its workers are at all times. Called Maps Coordinate, it combines a paid-for business version of Google's standard maps product with an application downloaded to a worker's smartphone, creating a real-time record of worker locations. Ironically, Google touted its worker tracking solution on the very same day that CEO Larry Page was a surprise no-show at Google's Annual Shareholder Meeting, leaving Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt to explain his absence. Schmidt explained that Page had lost his voice and, as a result, would likely also miss next week's I/O conference and possibly next month's quarterly earnings call. While a Google spokeswoman declined to comment further on Page's condition, Schmidt added that Page will continue as CEO while he recovers. So, why not reassure those worried about the situation by publicly tracking Page's location via Maps Coordinate? After all, Google's a true believer in eating its own dog food, right?"

25 of 272 comments (clear)

  1. Huh? by Russ1642 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What kind of crap argument is that in the summary? Live tracking the CEO of Google because you're upset about your stocks. Genius.

    1. Re:Huh? by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, live tracking the CEO of Google because Google is pushing live tracking of employees.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:Huh? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, live tracking the CEO of Google because Google is pushing live tracking of employees.

      Right.

      It's called turnabout, and by all accounts is considered fair play.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    3. Re:Huh? by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wait you're right!

      We never considered this in the past. We will completely rethink our strategy from this point forward.

      From now on we will not track a single person, everyone's browsing habits will be anonymous.
      Here's our new pricing policy:
      - $0.10 per google search.
      - $0.30 per click on a search result.
      - $10 per month for Gmail.
      - $0.50 per sqkm of map downloaded on maps.

      This new pricing structure offers people exactly what they want. A completely ad free and untracked Google experience. If you do not wish to pay this pricing scheme or wish to keep using Google services for free, you can sign up for a free google experience by sending an email to please_track_me@google.com

      Kind Regards
      Larry Page

      Google - Giving the customers the choice they always wanted.

  2. Does not correlate by javajawa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Really don't see how corporate tracking of employees suddenly becomes an expectation of publicly tracking an executive.

    --

    Meh

    1. Re:Does not correlate by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree. The description makes it sound like CEO caught a cold that included laryngitis... Seriously, that's not worthy of telling the whole goddamn planet where he is.

      In a world where much work is done at a computer, it's pretty easy to continue as CEO of a company (especially one as tech-oriented as Google) but not be able to participate in a public speaking engagement due to laryngitis.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  3. Re:Tracking employees is just wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sunday.

  4. WTF? by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it combines a paid-for business version of Google's standard maps product with an application downloaded to a worker's smartphone, creating a real-time record of worker locations

    No. A thousand times no.

    I can't believe people would be willing to do this.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:WTF? by Russ1642 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Many companies already do this. It's to track work crews for things like utility repairs, on-site troubleshooting, etc. It helps with scheduling and knowing who's close by when the next call comes in. There are plenty of 3rd party software packages that do this but when Google gets into the mix suddenly it's all 1984.

    2. Re:WTF? by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      when Google gets into the mix suddenly it's all 1984

      No, because once the technology is available, some asshole at the C level will decide that all employees need to install this on their phone. Even if is a privately owned phone.

      I don't want the government tracking where I am. I don't want my employer tracking where I am. I don't want Google tracking where I am. As soon as one of them has it, the rest of them will want access to the information.

      But you're right, it sure as hell is 1984 ... once people start doing this, there's all sorts of ways it gets abused or suffers from scope creep.

      Eventually it becomes a condition of employment, or any number of things. Categorically, DO NOT WANT.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:WTF? by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You realize lots of organizations already do this right?

      Scheduling arrivals of service people and deliveries pretty much requires tracking them.

    4. Re:WTF? by Minwee · · Score: 4, Funny

      If that scenario ever came to light I would make it my life goal to hack that tracking functionality.

      A digital, freedom-fighter kind of hacking...

      How about just a "Leaving your phone on your desk" kind of hacking?

      Or would that not be exciting and edgy enough?

  5. Soulskill by geek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Leave it to Soulskill to post this crap. Time to block the editor again eh? Sad how low the standards have gotten here.

    1. Re:Soulskill by kidgenius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's a difference between posting an article about a controversial new google technology. It's quite another to stretch it out and say google is being hypocritical for not using the tech to track their ceo who is out sick. Then to go on with stupid ramblings of "assure those shareholders who are worried..." It really is stupid.

    2. Re:Soulskill by geek · · Score: 5, Funny

      Alzheimers

    3. Re:Soulskill by NatasRevol · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So you buy that he lost his voice and won't be at the quarterly earnings meeting - In late July?

      That doesn't smell suspicious to you?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  6. CEO's do not equal rank-and-file employees by unassimilatible · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, why not reassure those worried about the situation by publicly tracking Page's location via Maps Coordinate?

    Uh, because there would be no point? What does the CEO's location have to do with stock performance?

    And I'm no Google fan (I'm an Apple stockholder), but there are obviously some security issues involving the whereabouts of a famous billionaire CEO (e.g., kidnap and ransom?) that don't apply to the rank-and-file employee.

    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
    1. Re:CEO's do not equal rank-and-file employees by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uh, because there would be no point? What does the CEO's location have to do with stock performance?

      Say, you're right! Let's stop paying them 500x what we pay rank-and-file employees while we're at it.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
  7. Re:Tracking employees is just wrong by Jeng · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Today they're tracking us during office hours, tomorrow they're tracking us after-hours. What's next?

    Hmm, perhaps

    Mandatory yearly physicals that only the company gets to see the results of.

    Pre-employment genetic testing.

    Employment termination due to not living in an approved community.

    Background checks of all family, friends, and neighbors.

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  8. Re:Tracking employees is just wrong by SirGarlon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Getting your friends and acquaintances to track you. Oh, wait! That's Facebook.

    --
    [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
  9. Re:Tracking employees is just wrong by Jeng · · Score: 5, Informative

    Already happens. In some call centers you have to put your bathroom requests into the call center management applications and then the app lets you know when you can get up and go to the bathroom.

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  10. Re:Tracking employees is just wrong by Artraze · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I find it funny how "civilized society" to you means telling your employer to go pound sand if it's not precisely the time you're supposed to be in the building.
    For me civilized is taking the occasional off-hours call in exchange for my employer allowing allowing me take an occasional (and, indeed, quite more frequent) bit of person time during work. Like reading and posting on slashdot, for instance. You know, like you're doing during these (ostensibly) business hours.

  11. Re:Tracking employees is just wrong by JoeMerchant · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Today they're tracking us during office hours, tomorrow they're tracking us after-hours. What's next?

    Hmm, perhaps

    Mandatory yearly physicals that only the company gets to see the results of.

    Pre-employment genetic testing.

    Employment termination due to not living in an approved community.

    Background checks of all family, friends, and neighbors.

    Oh, so you want to work in the Defense industry?

  12. Re:Tracking employees is just wrong by clonehappy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Exactly. So, when I hear stories of how there are millions of jobs just waiting to be filled out here in 'Murrica, if only you sell your soul and dignity for $7.25 an hour, I don't bat an eye when I see that folks would rather choose welfare or unemployment benefits over indentured servitude. In fact, given the same situation, I believe I'd probably have to choose the same.

  13. Re:Tracking employees is just wrong by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Funny

    MOD PARENT SIDEWAYS.

    --
    #DeleteChrome