Slashdot Mirror
Caffeine Linked To Lower Skin Cancer Risk
THE_WELL_HUNG_OYSTER writes "The curative effects of coffee continue to be discovered as the Harvard School of Public Health and Boston's Brigham & Women's Hospital published a new study today that links caffeine consumption with reduced skin cancer rates. Quoting: 'The study of nearly 113,000 men and women found those who drank three or more cups of coffee a day had a 20 percent lower risk of basal cell carcinoma than those who said no to Joe. Caffeine in non-coffee substances was found equally effective. The cause is speculated to be related to caffeine's ability to "kill off damaged skin cells," said Dr. Josh Zeichner, assistant professor of dermatology at Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York. "If you get rid of these cells that are damaged, then they don't have the opportunity to grow and form cancers."'"
Oh, good, I was just about to turn down my caffeine IV drip. I suppose it's time to turn it up!
640k ought to be enough for anyone.
Perhaps those drinking 3 cups a day are more likely to be in jobs where they are virtually chained to a desk, so they rarely see the sun and thus less skin cancer.
w-w-wwwonderedw-w-whyI-i-d-d-don't-t-tb-b-b-urna-a-a-sm-m-uch-a-a-a-sI-i-i-u-u-usedt-t-t-o
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
So maybe you should bathe in it rather than drink it?
Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
THE_WELL_HUNG_OYSTER, please. It's not like he's just ANY_WELL_HUNG_OYSTER. He's the one.
"Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
A study published today linked the acceptance of funding from coffee cartels to the finding of health benefits of coffee consumption.
(More) News at ten.
This! You rarely get similar exciting news about tea either killing you or giving you eternal life, makes me think I've chosen some kind of third world beverage... even alcohol gets the occasional "it's okay if you don't overdo it" so it has to have some first world banking behind it.
everybody is telling me that caffeine gives me cancer
Only the State of California knows that.
"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
I don't think you have to target the Illuminati. Some people have been trying to shoot down caffeine forever. It's a drug, so it has to be bad. It makes people feel good, so it has to be bad.
Unfortunately for the Puritans, it turns out the coffee is pretty innocuous. But, like with another popular drug that's made out to be more dangerous than it is, a portion of the society will never accept the phrase 'better living through chemistry'.
Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
No, you're supposed to take it orally.
Blank until
Unless you've been living under a rock, you get stories about the health benefit of tea all the time. Alcohol, too, though usually with caveats not backed up by the data. Nutritionists and public health people are generally ascetics, though, so stories about something that people like to consume being good for you are often downplayed or ignored.
Caffeine in non-coffee substances was found equally effective.
Wait just a minute - let's not go injecting unproven pseudo-science into this discussion!
Coffee is a source of good caffeine. Some of those other substances contain bad caffeine.
-- Your friends on the Coffee Council
#DeleteChrome
Be careful of studies that link things with minor changes from the control group, even ones with large populations. 20% lower than an already low risk is pretty much nothing. Just as an example, smokers have a 2000% higher risk of lung cancer than non-smokers. Whites have a 400% higher chance of melanoma than blacks.
The only time you can take small changes seriously is when there are multiple sources and a proposed mechanism that is consistent with our previous understanding. "May help kill damaged cells" might be 100% correct, but it's not a mechanism, it's just the hypothesized result.
These kinds of studies are interesting but don't make too much out of them.
DId they consider the fact that most of us who consume tons of caffeine are usually stuffed in an office somewhere outside of sunlight all day? The only sunlight I ever get is during the commute to and from work.
Basal cell carcinomas are very slow growing, very, very rarely invasive, and almost hardly metastasize. They're gross, unsightly and unpleasant, but not really a killer. If this were melanoma on the other hand, that'd be a big deal.
The state of California causes cancer.
Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
anecdotal evidence is anecdotal! Most of the people I know work outside, all day long, physical labor. They drink coffee all morning, and iced tea all afternoon. Your Caffeine user = indoor worker model is anecdotal at best, and assumptive at worst.
I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
On the other hand, the placebo effect of believing in the health benefits of moderate coffee consumption are likely to far exceed the actual ones.
I seem to recall that from about 2006 to 2008 all I heard about was the health benefits of tea, especially green tea. (Remember 'superfoods' and how 'antioxidants' were/are the solution to all health woes?) A quick google search for 'health benefits green tea' yields just shy of 6 million results. Is it just that none of these articles appeared on slashdot that's causing your conspira-spidey sense to tingle?
With a name like "THE_WELL_HUNG_OYSTER" I just gotta ask.