Slashdot Mirror


San Diego's Fireworks Show Over In 15 Seconds

First time accepted submitter fotoguzzi writes "Garden State Fireworks is investigating how the entire Fourth of July show was launched after a signal was sent to the barges that would set the timing for the rest of the show after the introduction. Can anyone suggest how such a trivial step could go so disastrously wrong?" It's not the first time such a thing has happened, either.

41 of 241 comments (clear)

  1. Just Like My First Time by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    But what an awesome 15 seconds that must have been!

    Yep, just like my first time ... she didn't seem to think so though.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Just Like My First Time by steelfood · · Score: 3, Funny

      Finally! A topic we can use sex analogies to describe!

      No wonder there are so few comments.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  2. I think we call that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...premature Californication....

  3. Nothing unique....so I hear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hear that happens to every fireworks show at some point in its life. It just needs to relax, take some stress off and not worry about how it performs. Just enjoy the show.

  4. What are people complaining about? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The idea sounds awesome. The videos look awesome. They've all had probably a once in a lifetime experience. And the one guy in the article was complaining about having to pay for parking?

    1. Re:What are people complaining about? by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I took your word for it and went to watch the video.
      Can't really see what was so awesome about a big cloud of glowing smoke.

      It might be awesome into you're into seeing things get blown up or are easily impressed with anything that goes boom. But when entire families spend their day camped out on the waterfront after a drive of who knows how long and paying the exorbitant parking fees, you can bet your ass they'd be upset.

      They were expecting an artistically choreographed fireworks show -- not a Redneck BBQ.
      The only once in a lifetime experience I see here is that they can fondly look back at the year the 4th of July was a complete ripoff.

    2. Re:What are people complaining about? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They can see an artistically choreographed fireworks show next year. They probably saw one last year. Around here they do one every Thursday, all summer. How often do you get to see what happens when all the fireworks go off at once?

      "The only once in a lifetime experience I see here is that they can fondly look back at the year the 4th of July was a complete ripoff."

      Strange how people getting a fireworks show for free can feel ripped off. Quite the sense of entitlement, hey?

    3. Re:What are people complaining about? by Roachie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My sentiment exactly, Ordinarily I would refuse to sit in traffic and get all bunched up with lake people and their little cracker spawn for some shitty fireworks show.

      Now, if they would have said, "This year, we shoot the whole god dammed thing at once, just to see what it looks like". I would have driven to San Diego.

      --
      This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
    4. Re:What are people complaining about? by SlippyToad · · Score: 3, Funny

      Can't really see what was so awesome about a big cloud of glowing smoke.

      The Universe is pretty awesome, IMHO.

      --
      One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
  5. Common problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now I know how my wife feels.

    1. Re:Common problem... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Funny

      You give her 15 seconds of fireworks so intense they can be seen in the next state?

      I don't think you need to worry about her cheating on you.

  6. Orban, UK by Ginger_Chris · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-15611160

    I'd rather watch these short ones than be stood out in the rain (England) for hours.

    1. Re:Orban, UK by craigwilkie · · Score: 3, Funny

      Which bit of "scotland" in the URL you posted did you not understand?

  7. Since I was a child, I've always wanted... by BMOC · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...for fireworks to be like that, just constant rockets and explosions non-stop for 10-20 minutes. Why do fireworks shows limit their bursts to a Grand Finale?

    Put me in charge of destroying money like this, and I'll create a number of bursts that keep you watching for the entire show, leading up to a ridiculous ending worthy of shore shelling from the Iowa.

    --
    I swear they give me mod points to shut me up.
    1. Re:Since I was a child, I've always wanted... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Informative

      Depends on the show. Those that are simulcast to music might have limitations on when/if they burst. Also I've done/seen shows that does ground effects at different times.

      Generally the budget I've seen is for a small city, one minute == $1000. Depending on the pacing at least one shell is being launched every 3rd second. That's 20 shells minimum if there are no multiples firing at the same time. $50 per shell including labor materials, other costs, etc. is what it boils down to. For a 30 min show, that's 600 shells.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  8. Decimal Poine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ok! Ok! I must have, I must have put a decimal point in the wrong place
    or something. Shit. I always do that. I always mess up some mundane
    detail.

  9. Re:How is that not better? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You could eat a 20lb sack of potatoes over the same timeframes. How does that not get better as time reduces?

    The shorter the time frame, the more entertaining it is to watch someone try and devour 20lb of... well, anything.

    Otherwise, why bother timing eating contests?

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  10. Milliseconds instead of seconds? by PRMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe the timings were in milliseconds instead of seconds (or a new version of the software suddenly thought they were). Now, 30 minutes of fireworks gets done in 1.8 seconds. But since fuses take a couple seconds and some are longer than others, you get a total of 15 seconds.

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  11. Re:You shouldn't have made her pay for parking (n/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    Ugh.

    Don't do that. No one reads the comment subjects. When you stick the whole message there, you just look like an idiot.

  12. Saw it happen once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I was in college I saw something similar. It was a sticky hot 4th of July evening. Just as the show was starting a big thunderstorm moved in. When they shot the first couple of rockets up, big flashes of lightning arced through the clouds in response. It was pretty impressive. They decided to shoot everything off at once, one after another; fireworks, thunder claps, lightning, all at once. It was totally awesome. Then it started to rain and all the braless coeds in tee-shirts had to walk back to campus. One of the better displays I've ever seen.

  13. Lots of WTF in that story by slashmydots · · Score: 5, Informative

    San Diego fireworks show exploded in 15 seconds, ruining show

    Well.....

    Best part about #bigbayboom fail is that EVERYONE has always wondered what would happen if all fireworks went off at once," tweeted @richandcreamy.

    There we go. That's more accurate, lol. I think "ruining the show" is a bit harsh :-P

    By the way...

    "I waited 3hrs in the cold and payd $12 for parking & got one little explosion?" tweeted @aj521z.

    What ****ing planet is this person from?! It is NOT COLD in San Diego at the moment at any time of day.

  14. Re:How is that not better? by tiberus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not always. Most customers (the folks who pay for the shows) want the longest show for the least money. I've worked show where we were launching one shell every three seconds in order to meet the show duration requested by the customer. Think this turned a nice 5 minute show into a painful 30 minute experience.

    How does is not get better as the time reduces?

    As time reduces you approach what we call a sky puke. Okay it's a lotta boom but, you really don't get to see much.

  15. Re:Wasn't there... by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 5, Informative
  16. Re:Wasn't there... by sarysa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The people who think a fireworks display is worth all that wasted time would probably be fine with such a once-in-a-lifetime spectacle, being laid back as they must be.

    --
    Charisma is the measure of someone's ability to lie with a straight face.
  17. Testing Circuit Failure? by weiserfireman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Electric matches on the circuits take 5 milliamps to ignite them.

    After the fireworks are loaded and wired up, testing is done to identify matches that aren't wired up right. Is there a chance that the testing process failed. On computer systems, it is pretty automated and happens fast. If the test resistor wasn't in the circuit properly, it might look like that.

    Notes
    I am a BATF licensed pryotechnician.
    I assist with a small show every year (our last night went flawlessly)
    I have never worked with a computer fired circuit

    1. Re:Testing Circuit Failure? by PPH · · Score: 5, Informative

      Electric matches on the circuits take 5 milliamps to ignite them.

      That's a bit low (see: http://www.pyromate.com/Basics-of-Electrical-Firing.htm). 5 mA sounds like the test current.

      It's going to be an interesting investigation. Most modern pyrotechnic controllers incorporate a shorting system to keep the squibs from being fired inadvertently by static electricity or single point control failures. To fire each circuit, the safety shunt must be removed and then the firing voltage applied. That's two failures at the lower level of the controller. And on every circuit simultaneously. I doubt it.

      From the video, it appears that the fault was common to three separate sites. They almost certainly used (at least) one controller at each location, tied together through somee communications network to a central control unit handling the timing. My money is on a software failure at that central point.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Testing Circuit Failure? by CatBandit · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Agree on this. This is a test procedure with firing currents instead of test currents.

      I designed the electrical and sofware part of a Firing System, and the matches needed much more than 100mA to fire, the 5mA seems on the test range.

      In our case our circuit tested the whole show in just a few seconds like this (each match every 0.05 or 0.1s). So if firing current (>>100mA) was applied a faulty test would do this.

      But because of this (this is also an economical disaster for the company), the test procedure is hardware forced with low current, with redundant circuits that block that disable the firing current by two or more ways by different systems, that means, that software and hardware must enable the fire.

      As this fired at the three places at the same time, this seems a completely software plattform with no apparent HW securities... bad idea.

    3. Re:Testing Circuit Failure? by 91degrees · · Score: 3

      But nobody was, and this isn't surprising. Pyrotechnics people have a very belt-and-braces approach to safety. If you're going anywhere near the explosives, the power is off.

    4. Re:Testing Circuit Failure? by cusco · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Depends on your pyrotechnics people. When I lived there Traverse City, MI, used to go withe the lowest bidder for their Cherry Festival fireworks. We lived two blocks from the National Maritime Academy pier where they launch from, and would walk down and watch the fireworks from the park there. In either '95 or '94 the bozos they had contracted somehow trashed their control board and proceeded to run the whole program by hand. This consisted in a guy walking up and down the pier with a FLARE setting off random fireworks in no particular order.

      This was amusing to watch, and even more amusing to hear the idiots nearby commenting on how wonderfully they were choreagraphing the fireworks to the radio station they were listening to, until all of a sudden the guy tossed his flare in the water, covered his head and ran like hell. A few seconds later one of the larger shells went off **in the mortar**, showering us with sparks and setting off a dozen or more fireworks at once. That turned out to be our "finale", except for those of us who were close enough to the company's trailer and got to listen to the worker tell his bosses to go fuck themselves because he was NOT going back out on that dock with another flare.

      I think they've abandoned the lowest bidder habit, at least for the fireworks display.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    5. Re:Testing Circuit Failure? by g1zmo · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm a licensed pyrotechnician (FPO) in Texas.

      (Hand-fired) reload shows are still done to this day, mostly because they are cheaper and the customer naturally wants to pay as little as possible. It's also how it was done when my grandpa first got into the business in the 50's.

      The last two shows I did were reload shows, and yes, it is basically just the shooter walking up and down the line of mortars buried in the ground touching a fusee (a.k.a. road flare) to the quickmatch fuses. Running behind the shooter are his helpers with armloads of live shells, dropping them down into the empty mortars that often still have smouldering paper in the bottom. It's quite a rush, and although I personally prefer an electronic show, there are plenty of adrenaline junkies who won't do anything other than hand-fired shows.

      Starting in the 70's you would see shows fired electronically, with a master control box where the shooter hits a switch for each shot in the show. This was the era when choreographed shows starting becoming possible. Many shows are still done this way. Nowadays lots of shows are computer-controlled with a laptop and an RS-232 (or other) connection in place of the shooter and switch panel.

      --
      I have found there are just two ways to go.
      It all comes down to livin' fast or dyin' slow.
      -REK, Jr.
  18. Re:You shouldn't have made her pay for parking (n/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Leper! Outcast! Unclean!

  19. The real explanation by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Funny

    Meriadoc Brandybuck, and Peregrin Took - I might have known!

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  20. Not surprised by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 4, Funny

    Among the accomplishments listed on the Garden State Fireworks (pyrotechnics company responsible for the show) web site:

    Statue of Liberty Bicentennial Celebration

    That time, they managed to shoot off the show a whole century early!

  21. Seems the test procedure went wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have designed the electronics and software of a fireworks firing system for a company that does regular shows here in Catalonia/Spain.

    Believe me, experienced people are very cautious in everything they do, but unexperienced people can make big mistakes if they are overconfident in a black box system that will do everything for them.

    In one point specifications said:

    -The firing system must make an autotest for each circuit for the team to check all connections are in place.

    They test the firing circuits of the fireworks several times before the show to fire all the material. In our case it was done exciting the fuses (sorry I'm not native english) with a safe very low current to see if the fuse is electrically present, and the inspections does a check of a circuit every 0.05s, so you can check the entire show in a few seconds.

    For me this seems the check was done with full current on the circuits which fired all the fireworks during this test procedure.

    It's quite surprising to have someone design a system that lets this happen from my point of view, in our case we made the circuits impossible (due hardware to redundant hardware switches and circuits) to excite to fire during the test (there are various physical limiter).

    So... it seems someone who had not enought experience with fireworks managed to build his system and convince this people to use it... but its surprising, it's a pretty conservative people, at least the ones I know.

  22. Re:Wasn't there... by milbournosphere · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was, up on the hill at USD. The sound-wave alone was AWESOME. Probably far more memorable than the actual show would have been.

  23. Re:Wasn't there... by HangingChad · · Score: 3, Funny

    The best part was the way everyone thought that was the opening. Then it dawns, somewhat reluctantly, that was the whole show.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  24. Fire One by smurd · · Score: 5, Informative

    A am a pryotechnician that works exclusively with computer fired shows. From what I'm hearing on the mailing lists so far, they were using the Fire One controller. We also use them (we have over 100 modules at $795 each). I haven't been involved in the "Loading" of the show into the embedded controller for the past few years, but I was called into action about 3 years ago when we had the same problem with our "semi automatic" shows (press a button for each event). I found there was an additional step when downloading the show from the PC to the firing controller called "Assign Delays" that had to be manually entered when loading. Without that step, all shells for each event fired immediately. I don't know if Fire One ever fixed it because it's now part of our written checklist for loading and we haven't had a problem since, and Fire One is notorious for fixing a problem with one customer, updating the firrmware but not telling the rest of their customer base that there is an update.

    If you are using Fire One, you can thank me for the new Line receivers in the new modules, I had to go to the plant and show them the problem.

    1. Re:Fire One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      While looking at their web site I found this quote:

      "FireOne is the only system in the world capable of firing multiple firing modules and multiple cues completely simultaneously - zero time dispertion between firings. The system can simultaneously fire any number of Firing Modules"

      Found at this URL: "http://www.fireone.com/system_spec.htm"

    2. Re:Fire One by smurd · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah, Don't get my above rant wrong, Fire One is the best system, really the only system out there for firing large shows. I use all of the others, but they are the only ones out there that can handle large pyromusicals (I.E. > 2000 cues).

      It has more then enough juice to fire an entire module (32 cues) at once, and that is a good thing for mine fronts, set peices etc... We need and want that feature.

      I'll be back at the magazines tomorrow and want to run a test - I'm thinking if you either forget to assign delays, or assign them twice for a fully scripted show, you will have the same result.

      As far as I know, there are no commercially available products out there that will let you test ematches with firepower on (the Capacitive Discharge circuit) powered, so I'm pretty sure it's not a testing issue.

      Even though Garden State is a competitor, I feel for those guys, We've had our share of learning curves too.

  25. Re:Wasn't there... by sarysa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Welp, I don't normally respond to a cynical mod-down, but I'm dead serious with this one.

    Lets face it, we all draw a line somewhere when we decide to attend something, right? I won't drive toward the beach (bay area) after 9am or so because that's when traffic becomes molasses, or stand in a long line for a slightly faster phone, or anything like that. Other people will. It takes a certain personality type to have the willingness to do so and I don't have it.

    The intent of the above quip wasn't to disparage those who do, but I can only imagine that if I'm the impatient type who times recreational activity around minimal wasted time (traffic congestion, staring at loading bars, waiting in lines), those who are willing to do these things are either
    A. much more laid back, or I suppose...
    B. doing it for their kids. Maybe I should've mentioned that before.

    In either case, a laid back person would think it's funny. A kid would think it's awesome. Kids haven't developed the sense of aesthetics needed to appreciate the rhythm and choreography behind the display -- they're just thinking "awesome, big explosion! Do it again!"

    So if you're so pissed off by my statement that you feel the need to hit Underrated in the popdown, maybe you're not laid back enough for such recreational activity. :P

    --
    Charisma is the measure of someone's ability to lie with a straight face.
  26. Re:maybe by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It was most likely just due to turning off the test mode. They were probably doing a last minute quick test to get the order correct. And forgot to put it into production delayed mode.

    Ah - those sweet computers.

    Which brings up an issue I have with modern fireworks displays. In our community, they have a pretty big fireworks display on the 4th. Big enough that people come from fairly far away to see it. They have been trying to outdo their selves every year, so what was once a really nice fireworks show is now a VIP Pass and pay-for event, synchronized with radio, computer controlled extravaganza that takes hours to get out of, so half the people try to leave while the display is still going on. All those headlights do not add to the ambiance, rest assured. They have had computer problems also, having to restart the show, ans restarting some of the tunes to re-synchronize. As a joke, I noted that it was probably a acrobat reader, or HP printer update.

    Coupled with the "We are so damned great and awesome" ads and news stories for it, the whole event has become more of an ordeal than enjoyable.

    Then a year or two ago, I happened upon a private fireworks display with a couple families and their children. A few hundred rockets, and the children playing with sparklers. Completely hand done, no synchronized music or anything. I enjoyed that a whole lot more than the "Bigger and better than last year" events by a long shot. Since then, I seek out the small shows.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.