Slashdot Mirror


San Diego's Fireworks Show Over In 15 Seconds

First time accepted submitter fotoguzzi writes "Garden State Fireworks is investigating how the entire Fourth of July show was launched after a signal was sent to the barges that would set the timing for the rest of the show after the introduction. Can anyone suggest how such a trivial step could go so disastrously wrong?" It's not the first time such a thing has happened, either.

60 of 241 comments (clear)

  1. Wasn't there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But what an awesome 15 seconds that must have been!

    1. Re:Wasn't there... by frosty_tsm · · Score: 2

      But what an awesome 15 seconds that must have been!

      Awesome 15 seconds, but 30 minutes of driving, 15 minutes to find a parking spot, 30 minutes of waiting, 1 hour of fighting traffic to leave... (the better viewing places get overwhelmed with people on the 4th). I'm sure some people were bummed even though It would have been awesome to see. I bet there's a few people who were looking the wrong way too.

    2. Re:Wasn't there... by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 5, Informative
    3. Re:Wasn't there... by sarysa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The people who think a fireworks display is worth all that wasted time would probably be fine with such a once-in-a-lifetime spectacle, being laid back as they must be.

      --
      Charisma is the measure of someone's ability to lie with a straight face.
    4. Re:Wasn't there... by localman57 · · Score: 2

      It actually isn't all that great, at least on the video. Part of the magic of the fireworks is how they move and expand. With that many going off that close to each other, it just turns into a bright pink blur. The beauty of the motion is gone. Fifteen seconds of a really good finalle seems better to me than 15 seconds of really bright blur.

      Much more entertaining, I thought, was the CNN video of a fireworks stand that caught fire.

      I can just hear the cops on the side of the road... "Move along people... move along... Nothing to see here..."

    5. Re:Wasn't there... by milbournosphere · · Score: 5, Informative

      I was, up on the hill at USD. The sound-wave alone was AWESOME. Probably far more memorable than the actual show would have been.

    6. Re:Wasn't there... by HangingChad · · Score: 3, Funny

      The best part was the way everyone thought that was the opening. Then it dawns, somewhat reluctantly, that was the whole show.

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    7. Re:Wasn't there... by sarysa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Welp, I don't normally respond to a cynical mod-down, but I'm dead serious with this one.

      Lets face it, we all draw a line somewhere when we decide to attend something, right? I won't drive toward the beach (bay area) after 9am or so because that's when traffic becomes molasses, or stand in a long line for a slightly faster phone, or anything like that. Other people will. It takes a certain personality type to have the willingness to do so and I don't have it.

      The intent of the above quip wasn't to disparage those who do, but I can only imagine that if I'm the impatient type who times recreational activity around minimal wasted time (traffic congestion, staring at loading bars, waiting in lines), those who are willing to do these things are either
      A. much more laid back, or I suppose...
      B. doing it for their kids. Maybe I should've mentioned that before.

      In either case, a laid back person would think it's funny. A kid would think it's awesome. Kids haven't developed the sense of aesthetics needed to appreciate the rhythm and choreography behind the display -- they're just thinking "awesome, big explosion! Do it again!"

      So if you're so pissed off by my statement that you feel the need to hit Underrated in the popdown, maybe you're not laid back enough for such recreational activity. :P

      --
      Charisma is the measure of someone's ability to lie with a straight face.
    8. Re:Wasn't there... by roothog · · Score: 2

      Welp, I don't normally respond to a cynical mod-down, but I'm dead serious with this one.

      So if you're so pissed off by my statement that you feel the need to hit Underrated in the popdown, maybe you're not laid back enough for such recreational activity. :P

      "Underrated" means that they were modding you up, not down. The mod down is called "Overrated".

  2. Just Like My First Time by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    But what an awesome 15 seconds that must have been!

    Yep, just like my first time ... she didn't seem to think so though.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Just Like My First Time by steelfood · · Score: 3, Funny

      Finally! A topic we can use sex analogies to describe!

      No wonder there are so few comments.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    2. Re:Just Like My First Time by drkim · · Score: 2

      Don't worry...

      On /. they will find a way to describe sex using car analogies.

    3. Re:Just Like My First Time by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      I drove my car without using gloves and now I have a little RC car that I have to spend all my money on.

  3. I think we call that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...premature Californication....

    1. Re:I think we call that... by jamiesan · · Score: 2

      The only problem with instant gratification, is that it's too slow.

  4. Nothing unique....so I hear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hear that happens to every fireworks show at some point in its life. It just needs to relax, take some stress off and not worry about how it performs. Just enjoy the show.

    1. Re:Nothing unique....so I hear by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 2

      Worse is when you can't get the fuse to light, no matter how hot and sweaty the crowd is with anticipation. Much, much worse.

  5. What are people complaining about? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The idea sounds awesome. The videos look awesome. They've all had probably a once in a lifetime experience. And the one guy in the article was complaining about having to pay for parking?

    1. Re:What are people complaining about? by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I took your word for it and went to watch the video.
      Can't really see what was so awesome about a big cloud of glowing smoke.

      It might be awesome into you're into seeing things get blown up or are easily impressed with anything that goes boom. But when entire families spend their day camped out on the waterfront after a drive of who knows how long and paying the exorbitant parking fees, you can bet your ass they'd be upset.

      They were expecting an artistically choreographed fireworks show -- not a Redneck BBQ.
      The only once in a lifetime experience I see here is that they can fondly look back at the year the 4th of July was a complete ripoff.

    2. Re:What are people complaining about? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They can see an artistically choreographed fireworks show next year. They probably saw one last year. Around here they do one every Thursday, all summer. How often do you get to see what happens when all the fireworks go off at once?

      "The only once in a lifetime experience I see here is that they can fondly look back at the year the 4th of July was a complete ripoff."

      Strange how people getting a fireworks show for free can feel ripped off. Quite the sense of entitlement, hey?

    3. Re:What are people complaining about? by Roachie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My sentiment exactly, Ordinarily I would refuse to sit in traffic and get all bunched up with lake people and their little cracker spawn for some shitty fireworks show.

      Now, if they would have said, "This year, we shoot the whole god dammed thing at once, just to see what it looks like". I would have driven to San Diego.

      --
      This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
    4. Re:What are people complaining about? by SlippyToad · · Score: 3, Funny

      Can't really see what was so awesome about a big cloud of glowing smoke.

      The Universe is pretty awesome, IMHO.

      --
      One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
  6. Common problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now I know how my wife feels.

    1. Re:Common problem... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Funny

      You give her 15 seconds of fireworks so intense they can be seen in the next state?

      I don't think you need to worry about her cheating on you.

  7. SMPTE timecode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One possibility is that the show was run by SMPTE timecode and someone mistakenly either started the code at a late point in the show causing the firing system to "catch up". Another possibility is the timecode was played back at fast forward instead of normal speed.

  8. Orban, UK by Ginger_Chris · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-15611160

    I'd rather watch these short ones than be stood out in the rain (England) for hours.

    1. Re:Orban, UK by craigwilkie · · Score: 3, Funny

      Which bit of "scotland" in the URL you posted did you not understand?

  9. Since I was a child, I've always wanted... by BMOC · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...for fireworks to be like that, just constant rockets and explosions non-stop for 10-20 minutes. Why do fireworks shows limit their bursts to a Grand Finale?

    Put me in charge of destroying money like this, and I'll create a number of bursts that keep you watching for the entire show, leading up to a ridiculous ending worthy of shore shelling from the Iowa.

    --
    I swear they give me mod points to shut me up.
    1. Re:Since I was a child, I've always wanted... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Informative

      Depends on the show. Those that are simulcast to music might have limitations on when/if they burst. Also I've done/seen shows that does ground effects at different times.

      Generally the budget I've seen is for a small city, one minute == $1000. Depending on the pacing at least one shell is being launched every 3rd second. That's 20 shells minimum if there are no multiples firing at the same time. $50 per shell including labor materials, other costs, etc. is what it boils down to. For a 30 min show, that's 600 shells.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  10. Decimal Poine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ok! Ok! I must have, I must have put a decimal point in the wrong place
    or something. Shit. I always do that. I always mess up some mundane
    detail.

  11. Re:How is that not better? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You could eat a 20lb sack of potatoes over the same timeframes. How does that not get better as time reduces?

    The shorter the time frame, the more entertaining it is to watch someone try and devour 20lb of... well, anything.

    Otherwise, why bother timing eating contests?

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  12. Milliseconds instead of seconds? by PRMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe the timings were in milliseconds instead of seconds (or a new version of the software suddenly thought they were). Now, 30 minutes of fireworks gets done in 1.8 seconds. But since fuses take a couple seconds and some are longer than others, you get a total of 15 seconds.

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    1. Re:Milliseconds instead of seconds? by Locutus · · Score: 2

      from what I read, they uploaded a configuration right before the show which sets the timing sequence for the entire show. On 3 out of the 4 launch systems which received the upload the control system immediately launched everything at once. The originating timing software could have saved a sequence file with incorrect seconds timing but what is obvious is that they do not test or validate the sequence file before accepting it. At the very least they don't check for out of bounds events like launching more than X number of mortars in Y seconds without validation.

      They can blame it on the "device" but it looks like a software glitch and hopefully it's at the application level and not something like an OS BSOD. Wouldn't it suck if the uploaded sequence file crashed the app _and_ the OS and garbage went out to the trigger unit causing the simultaneous launch.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  13. Re:You shouldn't have made her pay for parking (n/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    Ugh.

    Don't do that. No one reads the comment subjects. When you stick the whole message there, you just look like an idiot.

  14. Blame it on faster than light neutrinos . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

    . . . or it was an Imperial Units / Metric System mix up again.

    Metric System: meters per second.

    Imperial Units: furloughs per fortnight.

    I always buy Metric System fireworks . . . that go up to 11.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  15. Saw it happen once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I was in college I saw something similar. It was a sticky hot 4th of July evening. Just as the show was starting a big thunderstorm moved in. When they shot the first couple of rockets up, big flashes of lightning arced through the clouds in response. It was pretty impressive. They decided to shoot everything off at once, one after another; fireworks, thunder claps, lightning, all at once. It was totally awesome. Then it started to rain and all the braless coeds in tee-shirts had to walk back to campus. One of the better displays I've ever seen.

  16. Lots of WTF in that story by slashmydots · · Score: 5, Informative

    San Diego fireworks show exploded in 15 seconds, ruining show

    Well.....

    Best part about #bigbayboom fail is that EVERYONE has always wondered what would happen if all fireworks went off at once," tweeted @richandcreamy.

    There we go. That's more accurate, lol. I think "ruining the show" is a bit harsh :-P

    By the way...

    "I waited 3hrs in the cold and payd $12 for parking & got one little explosion?" tweeted @aj521z.

    What ****ing planet is this person from?! It is NOT COLD in San Diego at the moment at any time of day.

    1. Re:Lots of WTF in that story by TheCarp · · Score: 2

      > What ****ing planet is this person from?! It is NOT COLD in San > Diego at the moment at any time of day.

      answer: San diego

      I assume you don't know many people in hot climates. I used to chat with some people in Florida. Every year they would be talking about how cold it is and needing to "bundle up" because its so cold..... then I would check and it would be just under 70 F down there... while I am going outside with the wind whipping 20 F air at me.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  17. Re:How is that not better? by tiberus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not always. Most customers (the folks who pay for the shows) want the longest show for the least money. I've worked show where we were launching one shell every three seconds in order to meet the show duration requested by the customer. Think this turned a nice 5 minute show into a painful 30 minute experience.

    How does is not get better as the time reduces?

    As time reduces you approach what we call a sky puke. Okay it's a lotta boom but, you really don't get to see much.

  18. Re:NOT NEWS by jovius · · Score: 2

    Outsourcing?

  19. Re:I can explain that by jd · · Score: 2

    The easy solution is to have 30x as many fireworks and then run it at this speed all the time.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  20. Plagiarism in summary by fotoguzzi · · Score: 2

    (Submitter here.) I should have put quote marks around the portion of the sentence about signals and introductions. I meant to, but after multiple previews I still forgot. It took me fifteen seconds to submit this story....

    --
    Their they're doing there hair.
  21. Testing Circuit Failure? by weiserfireman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Electric matches on the circuits take 5 milliamps to ignite them.

    After the fireworks are loaded and wired up, testing is done to identify matches that aren't wired up right. Is there a chance that the testing process failed. On computer systems, it is pretty automated and happens fast. If the test resistor wasn't in the circuit properly, it might look like that.

    Notes
    I am a BATF licensed pryotechnician.
    I assist with a small show every year (our last night went flawlessly)
    I have never worked with a computer fired circuit

    1. Re:Testing Circuit Failure? by PPH · · Score: 5, Informative

      Electric matches on the circuits take 5 milliamps to ignite them.

      That's a bit low (see: http://www.pyromate.com/Basics-of-Electrical-Firing.htm). 5 mA sounds like the test current.

      It's going to be an interesting investigation. Most modern pyrotechnic controllers incorporate a shorting system to keep the squibs from being fired inadvertently by static electricity or single point control failures. To fire each circuit, the safety shunt must be removed and then the firing voltage applied. That's two failures at the lower level of the controller. And on every circuit simultaneously. I doubt it.

      From the video, it appears that the fault was common to three separate sites. They almost certainly used (at least) one controller at each location, tied together through somee communications network to a central control unit handling the timing. My money is on a software failure at that central point.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Testing Circuit Failure? by CatBandit · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Agree on this. This is a test procedure with firing currents instead of test currents.

      I designed the electrical and sofware part of a Firing System, and the matches needed much more than 100mA to fire, the 5mA seems on the test range.

      In our case our circuit tested the whole show in just a few seconds like this (each match every 0.05 or 0.1s). So if firing current (>>100mA) was applied a faulty test would do this.

      But because of this (this is also an economical disaster for the company), the test procedure is hardware forced with low current, with redundant circuits that block that disable the firing current by two or more ways by different systems, that means, that software and hardware must enable the fire.

      As this fired at the three places at the same time, this seems a completely software plattform with no apparent HW securities... bad idea.

    3. Re:Testing Circuit Failure? by CatBandit · · Score: 2

      Just add that this is an economical disaster, but more important a security disaster, imagine someone near the fires looking for the cabling when they did the test.

    4. Re:Testing Circuit Failure? by 91degrees · · Score: 3

      But nobody was, and this isn't surprising. Pyrotechnics people have a very belt-and-braces approach to safety. If you're going anywhere near the explosives, the power is off.

    5. Re:Testing Circuit Failure? by cusco · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Depends on your pyrotechnics people. When I lived there Traverse City, MI, used to go withe the lowest bidder for their Cherry Festival fireworks. We lived two blocks from the National Maritime Academy pier where they launch from, and would walk down and watch the fireworks from the park there. In either '95 or '94 the bozos they had contracted somehow trashed their control board and proceeded to run the whole program by hand. This consisted in a guy walking up and down the pier with a FLARE setting off random fireworks in no particular order.

      This was amusing to watch, and even more amusing to hear the idiots nearby commenting on how wonderfully they were choreagraphing the fireworks to the radio station they were listening to, until all of a sudden the guy tossed his flare in the water, covered his head and ran like hell. A few seconds later one of the larger shells went off **in the mortar**, showering us with sparks and setting off a dozen or more fireworks at once. That turned out to be our "finale", except for those of us who were close enough to the company's trailer and got to listen to the worker tell his bosses to go fuck themselves because he was NOT going back out on that dock with another flare.

      I think they've abandoned the lowest bidder habit, at least for the fireworks display.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    6. Re:Testing Circuit Failure? by g1zmo · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm a licensed pyrotechnician (FPO) in Texas.

      (Hand-fired) reload shows are still done to this day, mostly because they are cheaper and the customer naturally wants to pay as little as possible. It's also how it was done when my grandpa first got into the business in the 50's.

      The last two shows I did were reload shows, and yes, it is basically just the shooter walking up and down the line of mortars buried in the ground touching a fusee (a.k.a. road flare) to the quickmatch fuses. Running behind the shooter are his helpers with armloads of live shells, dropping them down into the empty mortars that often still have smouldering paper in the bottom. It's quite a rush, and although I personally prefer an electronic show, there are plenty of adrenaline junkies who won't do anything other than hand-fired shows.

      Starting in the 70's you would see shows fired electronically, with a master control box where the shooter hits a switch for each shot in the show. This was the era when choreographed shows starting becoming possible. Many shows are still done this way. Nowadays lots of shows are computer-controlled with a laptop and an RS-232 (or other) connection in place of the shooter and switch panel.

      --
      I have found there are just two ways to go.
      It all comes down to livin' fast or dyin' slow.
      -REK, Jr.
  22. Re:You shouldn't have made her pay for parking (n/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Leper! Outcast! Unclean!

  23. The real explanation by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Funny

    Meriadoc Brandybuck, and Peregrin Took - I might have known!

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  24. Not surprised by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 4, Funny

    Among the accomplishments listed on the Garden State Fireworks (pyrotechnics company responsible for the show) web site:

    Statue of Liberty Bicentennial Celebration

    That time, they managed to shoot off the show a whole century early!

  25. Seems the test procedure went wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have designed the electronics and software of a fireworks firing system for a company that does regular shows here in Catalonia/Spain.

    Believe me, experienced people are very cautious in everything they do, but unexperienced people can make big mistakes if they are overconfident in a black box system that will do everything for them.

    In one point specifications said:

    -The firing system must make an autotest for each circuit for the team to check all connections are in place.

    They test the firing circuits of the fireworks several times before the show to fire all the material. In our case it was done exciting the fuses (sorry I'm not native english) with a safe very low current to see if the fuse is electrically present, and the inspections does a check of a circuit every 0.05s, so you can check the entire show in a few seconds.

    For me this seems the check was done with full current on the circuits which fired all the fireworks during this test procedure.

    It's quite surprising to have someone design a system that lets this happen from my point of view, in our case we made the circuits impossible (due hardware to redundant hardware switches and circuits) to excite to fire during the test (there are various physical limiter).

    So... it seems someone who had not enought experience with fireworks managed to build his system and convince this people to use it... but its surprising, it's a pretty conservative people, at least the ones I know.

    1. Re:Seems the test procedure went wrong.... by jroysdon · · Score: 2

      I don't know about the laws in other states, but in California all large passenger vehicles (buses) have to stop prior to railroad crossings, open their doors and look left and right down the tracks (and presumably listen for a train).

      Agree or disagree, that is the law here.

      So I was riding the bus home one day (years ago, while saving to by a car for cash) and the bus driver failed to notice a set of train tracks (industrial area where you can't see the tracks except right in the road). So the driver hits the breaks *on the tracks* and opens the door, looks down the tracks (mind you, it's about 20 feet behind her, with the middle of the bus over the tracks), and then keeps going. Epic logic fail. You already broke the law, and now you're potentially endangering lives stopping on the tracks.

  26. Fire One by smurd · · Score: 5, Informative

    A am a pryotechnician that works exclusively with computer fired shows. From what I'm hearing on the mailing lists so far, they were using the Fire One controller. We also use them (we have over 100 modules at $795 each). I haven't been involved in the "Loading" of the show into the embedded controller for the past few years, but I was called into action about 3 years ago when we had the same problem with our "semi automatic" shows (press a button for each event). I found there was an additional step when downloading the show from the PC to the firing controller called "Assign Delays" that had to be manually entered when loading. Without that step, all shells for each event fired immediately. I don't know if Fire One ever fixed it because it's now part of our written checklist for loading and we haven't had a problem since, and Fire One is notorious for fixing a problem with one customer, updating the firrmware but not telling the rest of their customer base that there is an update.

    If you are using Fire One, you can thank me for the new Line receivers in the new modules, I had to go to the plant and show them the problem.

    1. Re:Fire One by amicusNYCL · · Score: 2

      Fire One is notorious for fixing a problem with one customer, updating the firrmware but not telling the rest of their customer base that there is an update.

      Glad I'm not the only one that does that. Our emails to customers typically go along the lines of "this update contains several changes and bug fixes, some of which you might notice."

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    2. Re:Fire One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      While looking at their web site I found this quote:

      "FireOne is the only system in the world capable of firing multiple firing modules and multiple cues completely simultaneously - zero time dispertion between firings. The system can simultaneously fire any number of Firing Modules"

      Found at this URL: "http://www.fireone.com/system_spec.htm"

    3. Re:Fire One by smurd · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah, Don't get my above rant wrong, Fire One is the best system, really the only system out there for firing large shows. I use all of the others, but they are the only ones out there that can handle large pyromusicals (I.E. > 2000 cues).

      It has more then enough juice to fire an entire module (32 cues) at once, and that is a good thing for mine fronts, set peices etc... We need and want that feature.

      I'll be back at the magazines tomorrow and want to run a test - I'm thinking if you either forget to assign delays, or assign them twice for a fully scripted show, you will have the same result.

      As far as I know, there are no commercially available products out there that will let you test ematches with firepower on (the Capacitive Discharge circuit) powered, so I'm pretty sure it's not a testing issue.

      Even though Garden State is a competitor, I feel for those guys, We've had our share of learning curves too.

  27. Re:maybe by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It was most likely just due to turning off the test mode. They were probably doing a last minute quick test to get the order correct. And forgot to put it into production delayed mode.

    Ah - those sweet computers.

    Which brings up an issue I have with modern fireworks displays. In our community, they have a pretty big fireworks display on the 4th. Big enough that people come from fairly far away to see it. They have been trying to outdo their selves every year, so what was once a really nice fireworks show is now a VIP Pass and pay-for event, synchronized with radio, computer controlled extravaganza that takes hours to get out of, so half the people try to leave while the display is still going on. All those headlights do not add to the ambiance, rest assured. They have had computer problems also, having to restart the show, ans restarting some of the tunes to re-synchronize. As a joke, I noted that it was probably a acrobat reader, or HP printer update.

    Coupled with the "We are so damned great and awesome" ads and news stories for it, the whole event has become more of an ordeal than enjoyable.

    Then a year or two ago, I happened upon a private fireworks display with a couple families and their children. A few hundred rockets, and the children playing with sparklers. Completely hand done, no synchronized music or anything. I enjoyed that a whole lot more than the "Bigger and better than last year" events by a long shot. Since then, I seek out the small shows.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  28. I was there, and it was fantastic! by Impish · · Score: 2
    We were up on Clairemont Mesa so we could watch a bunch of the firework shows around the San Diego bay area. When the downtown one went off it was spectacular. The horizon lit up for 5 - 10 seconds and the sound was wonderful! Everybody immediately started to check twitter to see what had happened and we all talked about it for 1/2 hr while we waited for the other firework displays to go off.

    We watched two more displays (yawn) and you know the only one anybody is talking about? Yup, the one that all went off at the same time. You know which ones I'll be telling as a great story for years to come? Yup, the one that screwed up. Do you think anybody cares what the Sea World fireworks looked like July 4 2012? No, no they don't. Hell, I forgot them 10 minutes after they were finished.

    The screw up was fantastic to watch and I'll still tell people about it years later: "Ever wonder what it would look and sound like if they all went off at the same time? Been there, witnessed that."

    So it sucks people paid to park and sat in the chilly evening, but c'mon, now you have a great story. Nobody would care to hear about the fireworks if they had worked!