Slashdot Mirror


The 300 km/h Superbus

pigrabbitbear writes "Have you heard of the Superbus? You could have already, as it has been in prototype production for years, and has recently been gaining more attention at auto shows and through public demonstrations. Like a stretch Batmobile that seems yet another triumph for Saudi and Emirate auto enthusiasts, passengers and their entourages enter the car under a row of gull-wings. The bus runs on batteries, and it can fly along at nearly 300 km/h (or 192 mph), and quite 'silently.'"

40 of 180 comments (clear)

  1. It's SENSATIONAL! But also kind of BORING! by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 5, Interesting

    First of all, the "thing" at the web site referenced is not a bus, itâ(TM)s a stretch limo. For example, the article goes on to say "The bus, which is better described as a sex-oozing cigarette-car..." Itâ(TM)s not a bus.

    Secondly, yes, I like the idea of a 200 MPH bus. As long as it is mechanically fixed in some way to a dedicated road â" maybe with something like a continuous piece of metal to guide it and prevent it from careening into space...

    Lastly, what's with the link to some advert-laden page-view magnet, instead of a direct link to the website of the project in question? Does Slashdot employ editors anymore? Did they ever?

    Here it is: http://www.superbusproject.com/

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:It's SENSATIONAL! But also kind of BORING! by Ichijo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As long as you're using a continuous piece of metal to keep it on the road, you could energize that metal and eliminate the need for batteries.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    2. Re:It's SENSATIONAL! But also kind of BORING! by AMDinator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At that point, you might as well just build a train.

    3. Re:It's SENSATIONAL! But also kind of BORING! by Baloroth · · Score: 5, Funny

      One that makes a "Whoooosh!" sound would be preferable, I think.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    4. Re:It's SENSATIONAL! But also kind of BORING! by Antipater · · Score: 5, Funny

      And TFS also says it runs super-silent. So you'd have to give it an artifical noise, to warn passers-by that it's approaching. Like, I dunno, "Choo-choo!" or similar.

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
    5. Re:It's SENSATIONAL! But also kind of BORING! by vlm · · Score: 4, Funny

      So you'd have to give it an artifical noise, to warn passers-by that it's approaching. Like, I dunno, "Choo-choo!" or similar.

      Thomas the tank engine theme song?

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    6. Re:It's SENSATIONAL! But also kind of BORING! by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      I am not sure a Super-Bus will solve our Mass Transpiration needs. I find the issue isn't as much about the Top Speed of the Bus. But the logistics of getting enough people to fill it up, and Drop them off in the right spots.

      Having a rail line, or a bus lane, only helps in particular areas.
      For Americans we are often much too spread out for good mass transit. Getting from Point A to Point B will take 3 hours. For 10 miles... It is actually faster to Bike, then to take the bus. Unless you are in NYC or Boston. Where you can take the Subway or the T... Then Mass transit makes more sense.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    7. Re:It's SENSATIONAL! But also kind of BORING! by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 2

      That "Whooooosh!" is a pretty good indicator of too much air resistance.

    8. Re:It's SENSATIONAL! But also kind of BORING! by BlueStrat · · Score: 2

      >dedicated road

      Yes. That would fly.

      Quite a hazard to aircraft, though I'm puzzled as to why it would be a necessary requirement.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    9. Re:It's SENSATIONAL! But also kind of BORING! by Unknown+Lamer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you build the rail, people will live there. The only reason people live by highways is because ... the highway was put there to attract residential development.

      Raleigh is currently suffering major growing pains, and unfortunately the state has chosen to build a highway through farmlands to house everyone... yeah, I definitely want to live 40 miles from RTP in the middle of nowhere and commute with $5/gal gas looming on the horizon... no, building a light rail system and encouraging people to live in the Raleigh/Durham corridor is a waste of money I tell you.

      Where there is rail, people will use it. See NYC (commuting into NYC from Long Island is a breeze on the train, effectively impossible by car, and that's a good thing), Boston, DC, etc. DC to a lesser extent because the Metro hasn't expanded into areas where people live, but MARC is tolerable if you only need to go into the city in the morning and back out in the evening.

      The whole "we're too spread out" argument is perfectly valid in the midwest though... and luckily most of our population exists hugging the coast lines. So... highways for the midwesterners, rail for the rest of us! Unfortunately, U.S. central policy is obsessed with "one solution for every part of our geographically diverse land" for whatever reason.

      --

      HAL 7000, fewer features than the HAL 9000, but just as homicidal!
    10. Re:It's SENSATIONAL! But also kind of BORING! by LanMan04 · · Score: 3, Funny

      They're two, they're four, they're six, they're eight,
      Shunting trucks and hauling freight!
      Red and green and brown and blue,
      They're the really useful crew!

      Why, yes, I DO have a 3 year old! Why do you ask?

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    11. Re:It's SENSATIONAL! But also kind of BORING! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You're doing it wrong. Instead of trying to graft a mass transport system on to a city you need to make new destinations that mass transport can take you to. In Japan the rail companies build big stations in new places, complete with attached shopping centre, and it becomes a destination in itself. That then helps relieve congestion in other areas too.

      Ideally you want to design around transport, but since we have big cities that need to be dealt with this is a good option for re-engineering them.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:It's SENSATIONAL! But also kind of BORING! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Worse, imagine arriving at work covered in cigarette car sex ooze!

      I believe the proper term is NICTOJIZM.

  2. Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'll pass, I saw the film: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Big_Bus

  3. I saw that movie... by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny

    was funny in pats I guess.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Big_Bus

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  4. Please be aware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That the bathroom is broken, and the next stop is in 1500 miles.

  5. Transport Tycoon Deluxe by guruevi · · Score: 2

    If I'm not mistaken, there was a SuperBus in there as well that did 300km/h

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    1. Re:Transport Tycoon Deluxe by sycodon · · Score: 2

      Uh Oh...must be one of those Camaro owners - Eternally jealous. :-)

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  6. A bus with no storage space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    For those times when you want to go somewhere, but you don't want to take anything with you or bring anything back.

    In other words, fine for going from your hotel to your business meeting, but that's about it. Like a limo without the privacy and quiet. I can't imagine a use for this that would justify dedicated 200km/h lanes.

    1. Re:A bus with no storage space by Nethead · · Score: 2

      Three words: Elk, Deer, and Moose.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  7. Ok... by jasno · · Score: 2

    Ok, so it's not really designed for mass public transportation, but it looks like it shows some concepts which could be easily applied to mass-transit, long-distance buses.

    Does anyone else think that self-driving, high-speed buses like that would eliminate the need for high-speed rail? With billions about to be spent on technology from the 1800's, it seems like there are other options which are much better suited to fulfilling America's transportation needs.

    --

    http://www.masturbateforpeace.com/
    1. Re:Ok... by bhtooefr · · Score: 2

      Metal wheels on metal rail have significantly lower rolling resistance than rubber tires on asphalt or concrete, though. And, the infrastructure for rail is better suited to providing electricity to a train (partially because there's already metal to metal contact) than the infrastructure for roads.

    2. Re:Ok... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Does anyone else think that self-driving, high-speed buses like that would eliminate the need for high-speed rail?

      Well, sure!

      ... Except, according to TU Delft's website, the feasibility of their 'superbus' is dependent on...

      Wait for it...

      Dedicated roadways! You know, like the ones trains run on, sans rails. So, not all that different after all (light rail actually wins out on this one, thanks to the ability to actually attach the vehicle to the infrastructure...)

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    3. Re:Ok... by jasno · · Score: 2

      Yeah but that requirement is obviously driven by the presence of human-piloted vehicles on the roadways.

      In 25 years, do you think you'll be able to drive your own car anymore? I doubt it. Autonomous vehicles are coming, and I suspect that in a quarter century we'll be regulating human-operated vehicles off public roads.

      --

      http://www.masturbateforpeace.com/
    4. Re:Ok... by vlm · · Score: 2

      Finally self driving trains are technologically a bit less complicated than self driving cars.

      I'm surprised no one has started outsourcing train/car/taxi driving to India. Well, I've seen the traffic in India... But the point I'm making is you could have any odd number of people cooperatively drive the vehicle. Since we're destroying the middle class intentionally we'll have nothing but ultra rich and ultra poor so we don't need self driving buses if the only thing on the road is ultra-luxury limos and for-profit prison cattle wagons, but if you demand a non-present driver it would seen teleoperation would be much simpler than hard AI.

      Trains are even simpler because if you lose signal, simply apply the E-brake and its all good, unlike cars.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    5. Re:Ok... by amorsen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Metal wheels on rail also makes for generally lousy acceleration and braking, which in turn leads to complicated safety systems and long gaps between trains. Building a road for this ought to be a lot cheaper than electric high speed rail.

      Of course that is no use if the bus is extremely expensive. Current trains can easily cost USD 50,000 per seat, so if it can get anywhere near that figure it is a win. Operating costs may be higher, at least until it is made driverless.

      The big question is whether people will use it. Right now there is a "rail effect" where putting in a rail service with exactly the same characteristics as a bus service will attract perhaps a third more passengers. Even if it isn't faster or more reliable. Missing out on 1/4th of the passengers could easily kill off this idea.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    6. Re:Ok... by trout007 · · Score: 2

      If I had my choice I would want all airplanes to be 2x2. No middle seats is my dream because I'm always next to someone spilling over their armrest.

      The only problem with air travel is the TSA. In the old days you could just show up 20 minutes before a flight and walk through a metal detector set to only detect handguns 9mm or larger and be on your way. These days it's easier to drive unless nature put an ocean in your way.

      Air travel is the best method of long distance travel because there is a network effect. If you build a new airport somewhere it is instantly connected to every airport that an aircraft can reach from there. There is plenty of air space to route flights around with the exception of some cities and even there it can be improved with better tech.

      Trains are great for commuting into or between cities where you don't need a car. Florida was going to put a high speed rail from Orlando to Tampa but it doesn't make sense. You can't get around either city without a car and they are only an hour and a half apart driving. It will be cheaper and easier to just drive. I used to live in NJ and it was nice taking a train into NYC since it's hard to drive there and expensive to park.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
  8. Yet another "supercar". by Animats · · Score: 2

    OK, somebody built a stretch-limo electric supercar. Those are fun, but not too useful. A stretch-limo version of a Ferrari has been built.

    The dual rear axles steer, so the turning circle is reasonable. (Many tour buses have that feature.) The limited ground clearance is going to be a problem on a long vehicle. It would have trouble with many driveways and all speed bumps. They should have put in a suspension that allows lifting the vehicle when necessary.

    The demo vehicle has lead-acid batteries and limited range. The designer talks about going to a more advanced battery technology. They also talk about battery swapping, but they'd need a network of battery-swap stations sized for this thing.

    1. Re:Yet another "supercar". by amorsen · · Score: 2

      If you have to upgrade infrastructure anyways then there's got to be a better way to do it from top to bottom then a stretch-limo Lamborghini look-a-like

      Is there? You need it to be light per-passenger because you don't have low rolling resistance of rail, so you can't afford the waste of floor space in trains (aisles etc.). You need it to be stable because you don't have the secure catch offered by rail, so it needs to be quite low and can't look like a bus.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
  9. Hopeless project by EdwinV · · Score: 2

    I probably know a little bit more about this thing than most and most of it is not good. Usually when trying something new, you'd expect people to try and prove the concept before doing anything really expensive. Here it was the other way around. Most of the effort was put into making a flashy prototype with all the bells and whistles in place. Really, worrying about where to mount the LCD displays? The result is a machine that incredibly expensive with no chance of commercialisation because litterally every part it contains is different. The things that were important, like aerodynamics and structural reliability have enough left over issues for anybody involved in the design to not want to be in it when it drives full speed. It it ever will. I suppose this is what you get when you hand over pretty much unlimited funding to people that have little interest in the actual science.

  10. Speed is irrelevant by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The speed of mass transit solutions is often irrelevant unless you're talking about ~300 mile trips where High Speed Rail becomes competitive with air travel. A much bigger factor is frequency. If you have to wait 15 minutes at a stop rather than 30 minutes then that shaves a considerable amount of time off your journey without resorting to unsafe velocities. When you see a tram with an aerodynamic front puttering along the street at 20MPH then you know that the aero front was all for show and had more to do with securing funding than actually improving performance. I suspect that the advertised top speed of this 'bus' has more to do with getting publicity and investor attention than anything that's likely to see service. Even on a German autobahn I wouldn't want to be sitting on a bus that goes faster than 70MPH.

    That said, journey time alone is not the only factor in mass transit. Comfort and convenience are a big deal. I know I'd rather have a nap or read a book or get some work done than have to focus on driving.

    Some of the routing ideas mentioned in the project's website are worth a closer look. Some interesting concepts in there.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:Speed is irrelevant by PPH · · Score: 2

      When you see a tram with an aerodynamic front puttering along the street at 20MPH then you know that the aero front was all for show

      Nope. There is a reason for that smooth, sloped nose. Idaho Stops.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  11. I smell another "Speed" movie... by purpledinoz · · Score: 2

    Does anyone else fear that this will be an excuse to make another "Speed" movie?

  12. Re:Lots of space in the Arabian Desert by vlm · · Score: 2

    From personal experience the best way to use a bus is to drive from drinking establishment to drinking establishment, and those are few and far between in the kingdom of S.A. .. at least officially. Now in Germany where the small villages are spaced roughly 10 kilotons apart, we could go pub hopping almost faster than a bathroom break at 300 KPH.

    Maybe sightseeing tours, where you can go from vegas to the hoover dam in minutes?

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  13. god the 70's had some AWFUL movies by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Funny

    If it's not atomic powered and can change tires automatically, I'm not riding in that deathtrap!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  14. Looks like a great transport from LA to Vegas by K8Fan · · Score: 2

    The world's fastest limo! At that kind of speed, it might be the fastest way from LA to Las Vegas, if you count all the airport security, baggage, etc.

    This is the school bus that Bruce Wayne used to ride.

    --
    "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
  15. Does it come with a spare tire? by HockeyPuck · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I found the limitations a bit much:

    200km range... or about 124 miles. Doesn't even get you from San Francisco to LA. Even if it only takes you 30minutes to get there, you're only saving about an hour. And this would required dedicated infrastructure/roads. Not exactly easy given that our highways are already crowded.

    Does it come with a spare? I realize that Greyhound buses have the same problem, but those buses a) carry many more people per trip and b) the company has a much better infrastructure for dealing with broken down buses. Plus the buses have no problems going over curbs, parking lot entrances etc..

    Where do you store luggage? Do you hold your bags on your lap?

    Looks like a stretch Ferrari. Interesting yes, practical no.

  16. Have I heard of Superbus? by glwtta · · Score: 2

    They're like a French No Doubt, right?

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  17. Re:Lots of space in the Arabian Desert by vlm · · Score: 2

    I didn't think Germany measured distances in small nukes also.

    Old .mil saying I heard a long time ago. There's a lot of variations but they all rely on you wanna be at least a KM away per KT at least for small values of KT. Once you get up to 100 or so the linear scaling breaks down pretty badly. Or another way to put it is if there's a grid of cities 10 KM apart you're wasting valuable fissionables if you hit each with more than 10 KT or so since that would be about the right value to relatively evenly toast an area. Dropping multiple 9 MT on a 10KM grid would be a bit excessive...

    Its an old .mil saying because the assumption was because .ru overpowered us about 10 to 1, the forces in Germany would pretty much be a speed bump during an invasion until the NCA got around to releasing the nukes, at which point things get pretty messy.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  18. Re:Sounds super by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2

    You could put a padded cow catcher on the front to loft pedestrians harmlessly over the top of the vehicle.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;