Slashdot Mirror


Viacom and DirecTV Reach New Agreement

An anonymous reader writes "About 10 days after Viacom pulled 26 channels from DirecTV over a contract dispute, the two companies have finally come to an agreement that should have DirecTV fans in need of their MTV rejoicing. While precise details of the newly agreed upon contract weren't made public, Bloomberg is reporting that the new contract is for 7 years with Viacom set to receive more than $600 million a year from DirecTV. That represents a 20% payment increase from the previous contract and is slightly below the 30% increase, or $1 billion, Viacom was initially pushing for." The disturbing part of this dispute, to me, was how Viacom pulled its shows from the internet in addition to DirecTV. Advertising your side of the story is one thing, but going out of your way to directly frustrate viewers who are interested in your shows seems like bad business.

8 of 139 comments (clear)

  1. One word: "Books" by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 5, Informative

    And the public library is still free.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  2. Re:two quick points... by acidfast7 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1. I wouldn't put MTV in the keep category. Perhaps in the 80s with Liquid Television and Remote Control. But, their reality TV is abysmal, at best. Nick is great for kids. 2. Yeah, the commercials really bug me. In most of the EU, there's a huge "Commercial" text on the screen with a timer counting down to 00:00 so you know when the programming will be back on. Sometimes, it's 5mins and it's great that I know exactly how long I have.

  3. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "The disturbing part of this dispute, to me, was how Viacom pulled its shows from the internet in addition to DirecTV. Advertising your side of the story is one thing, but going out of your way to directly frustrate viewers who are interested in your shows seems like bad business."

    This was one of DirecTVs key complaints. Why should DirecTV pay for content that Viacom was giving away for free on the internet? Not really an incentive to "pay" for that same content.

  4. Re:two quick points... by MitchDev · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've said that for years. PLUS, if so many of Viacom's channels are primarily AD-supported (MTV and Nickleodeon runs TONS of commercials), pulling the channels off of Direct TV means fewer viewers, meaning the advertisers are getting ripped off by Viacom. Viacom and companies like it should be PAYING the cable and satellite companies to carry their channels. If you want to charge for access to the channels, those channels shouldn't be double-dipping and showing commercials as well....

  5. Re:Pulled the plug on pay TV 5 years ago... by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Funny


    Area Man Constantly Mentioning He Doesn't Own A Television

  6. Re:Viacom: your name is mud. by MitchDev · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's part of the reason Cable/Satellite doesn't offer "build-your-own" packages where you can choose the channels you want....

  7. Re:So much hate here... by ewieling · · Score: 4, Informative

    but I still pay for DirecTV. Why? I have 3 children. NickJR is an amazing channel for kids under 7

    The PBS IQ/PBS Kids is a great kids channel. It is one of the digital OTA channels from PBS.

    --
    I really shouldn't have used someone else's email address for this account.
  8. Re:two quick points... by characterZer0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nick is great for kids

    Nick is not great for kids. Nick is great for lazy parents.

    --
    Go green: turn off your refrigerator.