Slashdot Mirror


Australians Receive SMS Death Threats

beaverdownunder writes "Many Aussies across New South Wales and South Australia had a bit of a shock this morning when they received an SMS threatening them with assassination. Although somewhat varied, the messages have typically read, 'Someone paid me to kill you. If you want me to spare you, I'll give you two days to pay $5000. If you inform the police or anybody, you will die, I am monitoring you', and signed with the e-mail address killerking247@yahoo.com. Police and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission have warned that the messages are almost certainly fake, and that no dialogue should be entered into with scammers." I hope "almost certainly" is droll understatement.

40 of 192 comments (clear)

  1. This isn't fair! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I paid good money to have you guys assassinated.

    1. Re:This isn't fair! by f3rret · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I paid good money to have you guys assassinated.

      They should have sent these SMS to the MPAA, RIAA crminals as well as the bought out Congress senators.
      Hilarity ensues.

      Hillarity and terrorism investigations.

      People would end up in Guantanomo over this.

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    2. Re:This isn't fair! by Kohath · · Score: 5, Funny

      No way. Barack Obama promised he'd close down Guantanomo when he ran for President 4 years ago. Surely it's closed by now.

    3. Re:This isn't fair! by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

      I paid good money to have you guys assassinated.

      How much did you pay to have the entire country of Australia assassinated? Did they give you some kind of group rate?

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    4. Re:This isn't fair! by funky_vibes · · Score: 2

      He did close it, and also made sure nobody gets out.

  2. Someone paid me to post this comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do not moderate it or report it to the moderators. I am watching you.

  3. Almost certainly fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Commisioner also stated that "You're almost certainly unlikely to be found dead in the bush 7 days after the message. Reason of death won't probably be 20-25 stab wounds in all body parts. There's practically no possibility your eyes will be burned out with hot iron. We find it very improbable that you will be dismembered with a piano wire and disemboweled. There is no reason for panic. Probably."

    1. Re:Almost certainly fake by AchilleTalon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Since Aussies are all having large penis, the spammers are switching their business in order to continue to make some kind of revenues.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    2. Re:Almost certainly fake by ByOhTek · · Score: 4, Funny

      This all seems familiar, but $5000 doesn't seem dirt cheap...

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    3. Re:Almost certainly fake by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 5, Funny

      This all seems familiar, but $5000 doesn't seem dirt cheap...

      Dirty deeds, indeed.

    4. Re:Almost certainly fake by z0idberg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Australia isn't one of these banana republics where you actually have to pay to RECEIVE text messages.

  4. Seems a very muted response by Kupfernigk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In England at least, judges have determined that SMS messages and Twitter have exactly the same status as any other written publication. Australian law is, I believe, based on English law. So: this would be a blackmail attempt. Five years' jail for every message seems about right. They need to find him and then he can spend the rest of his life locked in his parents' basement. Which, come to think of it, is pretty much what will happen if they don't catch him.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:Seems a very muted response by Antarius · · Score: 4, Informative

      Australian law is, I believe, based on English law.

      Back during the colonial days and original formation of the states, this was true. But once the states were formed, they were given limited independence to create their own laws (which had to be approved by the Crown at the time, such as with South Australia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Australia_Act_1834 )

      Full Independence was granted years later, and we now make our own laws as we see fit. Some of them logical, some of them even more fucked up than ever.

    2. Re:Seems a very muted response by mrclisdue · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nowadays, Australian law is based on what the USA wants.

      cheers,

    3. Re:Seems a very muted response by Nursie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Should be more than blackmail, this is harassment and a direct threat of harm, which I'm pretty sure is illegal in a large variety of ways.

      The police *should* be chasing this one pretty hard as it will have scared the pants off more than a few people. They probably won't though.

    4. Re:Seems a very muted response by Antarius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd love to argue with you and point out instances where you're mistaken, but I'm buggered if I can.

      Between our Patriot-Act-inspired anti-terrorism laws that came in for our good buddy Dubbya; our support for ACTA; our one-sided Free Trade Agreement which screws ourselves; and now the US Marines base in the Northern Territory (because Woomera wasn't enough).

      Well, we've effectively ceded control over ourselves to the US.

      I'm all for supporting our allies, and the US provides us with great protection, but we're legislating ourselves into being conquered.

    5. Re:Seems a very muted response by Wizard+Drongo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think what he meant was that English law and Australian law share a lot of similarities because Aus law is based on the English law; indeed a lot of the Acts are the same, because they predate the split. Hence a lot of Australian courts will take english court decisions into mind, as "non-binding precedence"; indeed, even US courts have been known to do this from time to time.
      Hence the ruling in an English court that a twitter update can be regarded i the same way as any other written document, could be used in an Aus. court as a "well here's what they did" precedence. Obviously, assuming Aus. has no such law or similar precedent in their own legal history.

      --
      The truth shall always be free: Boris Floricic is Tron.
    6. Re:Seems a very muted response by Antarius · · Score: 2

      Ahh, got you. I thought he was meaning that all of our laws were merely a copy of the UK ones.

      If laws haven't been enacted here, we do look at precedents set in other states, then other countries. The UK and the US being some of the more obvious examples. In this case, however, the Australian Telecommunications Act already covers these things and is quite unlike the UK version.

      But ultimately, the political parties usually have their own agenda. If we looked at more forward-thinking countries and our origins in the UK, we'd have things like Civil Unions here instead of arguments about them.

      I'm embarrassed by how backwards my own home-state (South Australia) is. Having been founded by a British Act of parliament in 1834 to become a virtual Britian-in-Australia (and the only state to never have been a penal colony), it went on to be so forward thinking as to be the first place to introduce a secret ballot for government elections; the second place in the world to give women the right to vote (The Kiwis beat us by a year); the first place to allow women the right to run for parliament; the first part of the British Empire to legalise Trade Unions; The first state in Australia to prohibit discrimation based on race, colour, country of origin, gender or marital status; the first state in Australia to decriminalise homosexuality; the first state in Australia to make rape in marriage a criminal offence; the first state in Australia to implement a 'container deposit' recycling system (currently 10c refund per can/bottle/milk carton); and the first state in Australia to ban plastic shopping bags

      Since then, it has lead the country in going backwards. It was the first state in Australia to criminalise anonymous free political speech just a couple of years ago (which was reversed on public backlash); the state that denied Australia the R18+ rating on computer games; Is behind the eastern states in its stance on civil unions; the list goes on.

      So... Let's hope they don't continue their backwards tradition and suddenly ban/censor SMS or mobile communications or something stupid. >.>

  5. Assumptions ... by MSojka · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I hope "almost certainly" is droll understatement.

    It certainly is. On the other hand, assume you can send SMSes in a way which is not traceable and comparatively cheap. Assume you want the entire police force of some place - say, New South Wales - to be too busy and way less effective. Assume you want to commit some other crime which would greatly benefit from the police force in that place being too busy chasing phantoms.

    What would you do?

    1. Re:Assumptions ... by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 2

      Hmm "Die Hard 3" ?

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    2. Re:Assumptions ... by Pieroxy · · Score: 2, Funny

      What would you do?

      I'd grab a beer, start up the BBQ, prepare some T-Bones with some olive oil and some spices, and lay out in the sun.

      Did I win?

    3. Re:Assumptions ... by jamesh · · Score: 3, Funny

      I hope "almost certainly" is droll understatement.

      It certainly is. On the other hand, assume you can send SMSes in a way which is not traceable and comparatively cheap. Assume you want the entire police force of some place - say, New South Wales - to be too busy and way less effective. Assume you want to commit some other crime which would greatly benefit from the police force in that place being too busy chasing phantoms.

      What would you do?

      Mod you -1, Droll.

    4. Re:Assumptions ... by ignavus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Assume you want the entire police force of some place - say, New South Wales - to be too busy and way less effective.

      What would you do?

      Elect Barry O'Farrell as Premier.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
  6. Australians Receive SMS Death Threats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is a fairly common scam usually received by e-mail. Lot of examples on www.419-eater.com where these types of scammers are known as hitlads.

    1. Re:Australians Receive SMS Death Threats by mjwx · · Score: 2

      I'm sure they are in Oz, but that's because there are no phones or internet there. They only have to fear the witch.

      And dingo's, they take babies you know.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  7. On the bright side... by arse+maker · · Score: 4, Funny

    People who are wanting to commit suicide are finally getting valet service.

  8. Never had a death threat spam... by jcr · · Score: 2

    But I did get a spam once from someone claiming that he had evidence that would land me in prison, and threatening to report me to the FBI unless I immediately wrote back for instructions on how to pay him.

    I did reply with a rather graphic description of the services his parents perform for sailors, and never heard from him again.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  9. Re:Never had a death threat spam... by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Funny

    But I did get a spam once from someone claiming that he had evidence that would land me in prison, and threatening to report me to the FBI unless I immediately wrote back for instructions on how to pay him.

    Hey, is that you Julian Assange?

  10. um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The last time I checked everything in Australia will kill you in various ways so why would an extra assassin matter? Target a place where everything that moves isn't an assassin.

  11. Re:Common hired killer scam. by shiftyphil · · Score: 3, Informative

    Mass SMS message rather than email seems to be the main difference.

  12. Stupidity Tax by ad454 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Reminds me of an old Kids-in-the-Hall skit:

    Casher: "And another $5 for the Stupidity Tax."
    Customer: "Stupidity Tax? What's that?"
    Casher: "Oh, since you asked about it, you don't have to pay."

    You previously see the casher successfully get away with charging the tax with the other "stupid" customers.

    The reason why we have so much spam and other scams is because there are enough stupid people to make it economically viable.

  13. Contacting the scammer by fufufang · · Score: 2

    Has anyone tried contacting killerking247@yahoo.com yet? That email account must be bloody famous right now.

    1. Re:Contacting the scammer by MRe_nl · · Score: 2

      It seems to resolve to http://www.whitehouse.gov/assassinations

      Maybe it's legit after all?
      Just a new way of fundraising?

      --
      "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
  14. Re:Oh really? by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 2

    ...and signed with the e-mail address killerking247@yahoo.com.

    ... ... ...yeah, sounds totally legit! This most be...uuhh...the king of all Hitmen! Or something...

    It was probably because Killer Queen was taken by Freddie Mercury and the boys back in 1974 ;-)

  15. Re:I would sleep better after such a message.... by GloomE · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just watch out for the high-tech SMS wielding drop bears.

  16. Re:I would sleep better after such a message.... by mseeger · · Score: 3, Funny

    The right to arm bears shall not be restricted....

  17. Trolololo by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Hello! I understand why you would want to kill a Nigerian prince, however, my country is in turmoil and my money is tied from my hands. Please allow me to send you a check for $30,000 which you can cash and please Western Union all but your $5000 back to me at this address: ..."

    --
    If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
  18. USA VER by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 3, Funny

    IF YOU don't send me $500 I will TXT spam you endlessly and on most plans where you pay up to $0.25 for each TXT it will add up quickly

  19. Re:What is freedom of speech? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

    Threats are an exception to most freedom of speech laws/amendments/statements of rights. Including in the US.

  20. He was doing it wrong :) by davidwr · · Score: 4, Funny

    He should've sent a followup:

    "The previous SMS was sent to many people in error. Only one of your lives is in danger. If you send me $5000 I'll let you know if it's you."

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.