Slashdot Mirror


Australians Receive SMS Death Threats

beaverdownunder writes "Many Aussies across New South Wales and South Australia had a bit of a shock this morning when they received an SMS threatening them with assassination. Although somewhat varied, the messages have typically read, 'Someone paid me to kill you. If you want me to spare you, I'll give you two days to pay $5000. If you inform the police or anybody, you will die, I am monitoring you', and signed with the e-mail address killerking247@yahoo.com. Police and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission have warned that the messages are almost certainly fake, and that no dialogue should be entered into with scammers." I hope "almost certainly" is droll understatement.

12 of 192 comments (clear)

  1. This isn't fair! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I paid good money to have you guys assassinated.

    1. Re:This isn't fair! by Kohath · · Score: 5, Funny

      No way. Barack Obama promised he'd close down Guantanomo when he ran for President 4 years ago. Surely it's closed by now.

  2. Someone paid me to post this comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do not moderate it or report it to the moderators. I am watching you.

  3. Almost certainly fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Commisioner also stated that "You're almost certainly unlikely to be found dead in the bush 7 days after the message. Reason of death won't probably be 20-25 stab wounds in all body parts. There's practically no possibility your eyes will be burned out with hot iron. We find it very improbable that you will be dismembered with a piano wire and disemboweled. There is no reason for panic. Probably."

    1. Re:Almost certainly fake by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 5, Funny

      This all seems familiar, but $5000 doesn't seem dirt cheap...

      Dirty deeds, indeed.

  4. Assumptions ... by MSojka · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I hope "almost certainly" is droll understatement.

    It certainly is. On the other hand, assume you can send SMSes in a way which is not traceable and comparatively cheap. Assume you want the entire police force of some place - say, New South Wales - to be too busy and way less effective. Assume you want to commit some other crime which would greatly benefit from the police force in that place being too busy chasing phantoms.

    What would you do?

  5. Australians Receive SMS Death Threats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is a fairly common scam usually received by e-mail. Lot of examples on www.419-eater.com where these types of scammers are known as hitlads.

  6. um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The last time I checked everything in Australia will kill you in various ways so why would an extra assassin matter? Target a place where everything that moves isn't an assassin.

  7. Stupidity Tax by ad454 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Reminds me of an old Kids-in-the-Hall skit:

    Casher: "And another $5 for the Stupidity Tax."
    Customer: "Stupidity Tax? What's that?"
    Casher: "Oh, since you asked about it, you don't have to pay."

    You previously see the casher successfully get away with charging the tax with the other "stupid" customers.

    The reason why we have so much spam and other scams is because there are enough stupid people to make it economically viable.

  8. Re:Seems a very muted response by mrclisdue · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nowadays, Australian law is based on what the USA wants.

    cheers,

  9. Re:I would sleep better after such a message.... by GloomE · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just watch out for the high-tech SMS wielding drop bears.

  10. Trolololo by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Hello! I understand why you would want to kill a Nigerian prince, however, my country is in turmoil and my money is tied from my hands. Please allow me to send you a check for $30,000 which you can cash and please Western Union all but your $5000 back to me at this address: ..."

    --
    If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits