Slashdot Mirror


Budget 27" IPS Displays From Korea Are For Real

crookedvulture writes "Giant, high-resolution LCD monitors have been around for years, but they've always been prohibitively expensive. Good displays based on IPS panel technology command upwards of $700 for 27" models and closer to $1200 for 30-inchers. However, Korean vendors have started selling similar screens on eBay for roughly half the price. These off-brand models purportedly use the same panels as pricier alternatives, and in practice, they appear to be nearly as good. There are some caveats, of course. The number of inputs may small, HDCP support isn't guaranteed, and user controls can be limited. Those may be deal-breakers for some, but getting a 27", 2560x1440 IPS display for well under $400 will be a deal-maker for others."

59 of 266 comments (clear)

  1. sounds interesting by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Informative

    lack of hdcp support sounds GREAT to me. no license fee, no contribution to the bad ways via my purchase! no supporting a bad regime (hdcp) with my dollars.

    I watch using a pc and I never care about 'protected path' content. my dvd's are ripped and saved on a nas, drm-free. I could give a shit about hdcp!

    sign me up!

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    1. Re:sounds interesting by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And, well, you might not want to use anything like that right now. What about the time when everything requires it?

      So the OP should give up his principles (no contribution to the bad ways via my purchase!) for a little convenience?

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    2. Re:sounds interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What about the time when everything requires it?

      Define everything. Are you suddenly going to start requiring HDCP on your personal recorded videos? I don't think so.

    3. Re:sounds interesting by Hatta · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Until you want to use it as an output on something that requires a protected path.

      Which will be never.

      What about the time when everything requires it?

      Then I'll spend my time agitating instead of consuming entertainment. I think TPTB know better than to withhold circuses.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    4. Re:sounds interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You could NOT give a shit about HDCP. Stop butchering our language.

    5. Re:sounds interesting by Sloppy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What about the time when everything requires [a protected path]?

      Should the day come that you can't view a web page without HDCP protection (or when a significant number of people can't do it), then I, as the copyright holder for all my comments, will revoke the authorization that I have given up to now, for people to descramble the HDCP which effectively limits access to my Slashdot comments.

      According to DMCA, viewing my comment will become illegal. Making HDCP-compatible monitors will be illegal. Selling HDCP-compatible monitors will be illegal.

      Chaos ensues. Make my fucking day, Hollywood. I'll kill you with your own law.

      Never, ever apply your DRM to someone else's content, without getting a contract from them that secures descrambling authorization in perpetuity. Otherwise, you make it possible for someone else to cause your DRM scheme to become illegal for anything to be interoperative with. HDCP is a ticking time bomb, waiting for anyone who feels like destroying it, to press the red button.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    6. Re:sounds interesting by guruevi · · Score: 4, Informative

      Agreed, I work in the scientific field and getting a 120Hz or higher display to work without HDCP currently requires a little box that doesn't support HDCP just to kill the signal. Without the little box (Gefen DVI-Detective), the HDCP signal won't work correctly through any type of DVI-D splitter (one side will get the signal while the other one gets snow).

      I love when I can find a display that doesn't support HDCP as it cuts the cost of circumventing HDCP. HDCP is killing legitimate use cases and requires work arounds that aren't obvious.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    7. Re:sounds interesting by RulerOf · · Score: 2

      What about the time when everything requires it?

      Need we truly agonize over monitor selection at the End of Days?

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    8. Re:sounds interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      That is a shit for which I could not give.

    9. Re:sounds interesting by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Funny

      "those who trade open video standards for temporary raster spray deserve neither!"

      (I think someone famous once said that. or, did I dream it?)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    10. Re:sounds interesting by sjames · · Score: 2

      HDCP is completely broken. The method to generate an endless supply of valid keys is in the public domain now. The more 'required' it becomes, the more likely someone is to start selling the 21st century version of the 'video stabilizer'

    11. Re:sounds interesting by unitron · · Score: 2

      Well, then, obviously he was right!

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  2. Common practice. by Kenja · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I assume these are screens that where rejected for minor defects by their intended brand and resold. This happens a lot, even with name brand products such as CISCO network gear.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Common practice. by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

      I assume these are screens that where rejected for minor defects by their intended brand and resold. This happens a lot, even with name brand products such as CISCO network gear.

      Probably get some great comedy reading the manuals, too, as cut rate electronics sellers usually don't want to tie up any money on wages for people actually capable of translating and editing

      for best experience insert power outlet recepticle the power cord before turn on

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Common practice. by JDG1980 · · Score: 2

      Probably get some great comedy reading the manuals, too, as cut rate electronics sellers usually don't want to tie up any money on wages for people actually capable of translating and editing

      When was the last time you read your monitor's manual?

      I don't recall ever looking at mine. Not once.

    3. Re:Common practice. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2, Funny

      Probably get some great comedy reading the manuals, too, as cut rate electronics sellers usually don't want to tie up any money on wages for people actually capable of translating and editing

      When was the last time you read your monitor's manual?

      I don't recall ever looking at mine. Not once.

      Must be a chick, that's the only logical reason anyone would ever look at a manual.

      Ever.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    4. Re:Common practice. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      There are chicks in manuals?

      ... Yea, I suppose you could count Penthouse as a sort of manual...

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    5. Re:Common practice. by vlm · · Score: 5, Funny

      Must be a chick, that's the only logical reason anyone would ever look at a manual.

      Ever.

      My chick did not come with a manual, which would have helped during initial set up and especially during troubleshooting. Seems to malfunction every month. No, she's not a realdoll or even a Korean graymarket purchased off ebay.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    6. Re:Common practice. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not rejects, just lacking a lot of the electronics (no scaling, no DRM, only one input, no colour management or image enhancement, no on-screen menus). They are manufactured to a lower spec as well, so they will tolerate the odd bit of dust behind the glass or a few dead pixels, but it is pot luck if you get any of that or not. Some vendors will check and make sure you get a pristine one for a few extra dollars.

      I had a dead pixel when I bought my my 24" monitor. I massaged it out easily, but maybe I was lucky.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Common practice. by Guspaz · · Score: 2

      I've had dead pixels on big name monitors... it's not like LG or or Samsung or Dell won't tolerate them. Even when they do have a dead pixel policy, the policy usually only specifies how many of what kind of dead pixels they'll tolerate before they replace it.

      In some respects, skipping all the enhancement hardware should result in lower latency, which can be a good thing.

    8. Re:Common practice. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      my favorite after-hours game is to take those little packets of do not eats and leave them at restaurants, on empty tables. then wait for the fun to ensue.

      shhhh. don't tell anyone its me.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    9. Re:Common practice. by Rebelgecko · · Score: 2
      --
      CATS/Diebold '08- All your vote are belong to us!
    10. Re:Common practice. by iB1 · · Score: 2

      Have you tried turning her on and off again?

  3. Consistency counts by JoeMerchant · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have, more than once, ordered something cheap that turned out to be good, then ordered a 2nd or 3rd copy, only to have the later ones (branded the same) be.... different.

    Latest case in point: $90 7" tablets - first one: 4.5 hour battery life, second one: 2.0 hour battery life.

    1. Re:Consistency counts by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have, more than once, ordered something cheap that turned out to be good, then ordered a 2nd or 3rd copy, only to have the later ones (branded the same) be.... different.

      Latest case in point: $90 7" tablets - first one: 4.5 hour battery life, second one: 2.0 hour battery life.

      This is where you really win with Samsung, Apple and only a few other manufacturers - pushing new technology and acceptable failure rates of manufacturing are turning out a lot of garbage. Read reviews on Amazon for some CE stuff, wildly varying accounts by users "It was dead in 20 minutes", "Wonderful, would buy again!" "Best deal I've had in years!" "This thing worked at first, then started acting up so I sent it back" "BEWARE!!!" etc.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  4. 2560 x 1440 is sweet! by Nichotin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For "real" 27" displays that have 2560 x 1440, and not just full-HD, the experience is really good. I first regretted shelling out for a Dell UltraSharp U2711, but after connecting it and seeing the amount of screen real estate I eventually bought another one for my second computer. 2560x1440 eliminates my need for an extra monitor completely, and by using the Windows+(left arrow|right arrow) function in Windows, or Divvy on Mac, I can easily fill the browser on one side and the application I work with on the other.

    1. Re:2560 x 1440 is sweet! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's no such thing as 'enough', let alone 'too much' screen space.

      I disagree. The optimal amount of screen space just fills my field of vision. Add any more, and spacial memory starts to work less well. I spent a while working with dual 30" monitors, and it was really easy to lose windows and have to spend some time finding them. A 27" display seems about right, maybe slightly small, but it's possible to put it where you don't need to turn your head to see everything.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:2560 x 1440 is sweet! by ChrisMaple · · Score: 5, Funny

      The screen is too large if it takes so long to run to the other end that I forget what I'm looking for.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  5. Re:Buy local by SpectreBlofeld · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Only 1920x1080, and four inches smaller... it's a completely different product.

  6. Re:Buy local by greg1104 · · Score: 2

    At the end of the article there's a link to the AURIA EQ276W 27" LED Monitor, which is in stock at my local MicroCenter. It's 27" and 2560 x 1440 like the model reviewed and a bit more expensive, but it also has more inputs (VGA and HDMI).

  7. Now how about making some that are... by neminem · · Score: 4, Insightful

    16:10 instead of 16:9. [/obligatory post]

    1. Re:Now how about making some that are... by robthebloke · · Score: 4, Funny

      or maybe just 8:5?

    2. Re:Now how about making some that are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      9:5, what a way to make a living.

  8. Re:Sweet by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

    for set-top boxes or dvd players or, for sure, bd players, it matters.

    for pc based playing, it should *not* matter. that is, if you drm-stripped your media (anydvd, or similar).

    btw, the lack of hdmi inputs is no big deal! for $10 or less, you can find 3 input (and more) hdmi switches with a single hdmi output. these days, the chipsets are pretty stable and interoperable (not true 5 or so years ago).

    my favorite is the hdmi switch that has a cord/jack for an 'eye' IR remote sensor. the secret is that you can have a sender create IR streams to switch channels for you. regular old 38khz ir stuff. arduinos can handle this (hint hint). in this way, you can have a remotely (via pc) controlled hdmi switch.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  9. Re:Buy local by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

    too bad that, just 2 days ago, microcenter in the bay area CLOSED.

    still upset about that....

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  10. Re:such a good bargain? by HarrySquatter · · Score: 2

    Yes. This has higher resolution, better DPI, better color reproduction, less input lag, etc. than your TV.

  11. I bought one 4 months ago! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yep they are for real. Sold on Ebay mostly. You can read all about people's buying and ordering experiences at overclock.net:
    http://www.overclock.net/t/1232496/crossover-27q-led-led-p-27m-led-2720mdp-gold-led-monitor-club/1800

    My experience:
    1) Bought a Crossover 27" IPS with swivel stand from S. Korea over ebay - $420 (Canadian) shipping included
    2) Arrived in 3 days in Canada from Korea (If only Canada Post was that efficient)
    3) Seller filled out customs form saying it was worth $150, I paid next to nothing in duty fees.
    4) Monitor is freakin' awesome in display quality
    5) Had 1 red stuck pixel that shows up in black background, but that you won't even notice unless you go hunting for it.
    6) Monitor has no warranty, but at less than 50% of the cost, it's a risk you take. That said, seller did say he'd take it back if there was a serious defect/damage in shipping.
    7) The IPS panel is the same one they put into Apple's 27" Cinema display, but didn't make the cut for some reason. I can't see anything wrong with it.
    8) WARNING: There are practically no button controls on the monitor. Only brightness up/down and on/off. That's it!
    9) The build quality of the 27" Crossover casing is superior to that of even Dell (read the forums above if you don't believe me). It is solid metal (not cheap plastic), and looks very stylish. That said, a word of warning, the monitor gets almost too hot in the back during hot summer days if I don't open the office window.

    For $500-$700 discount, I accept no warranty, slight overheating on hot days, 1 stuck pixel, and only 2 control buttons.

    1. Re:I bought one 4 months ago! by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      I would imagine #5 would be why it did not make the cut for #7. As much as Apple charges for those I would be returning one if it had a stuck pixel.

    2. Re:I bought one 4 months ago! by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 2

      I bought one on Ebay also. The seller asked what amount to declare on the customs form, since some countries charge duties on imports. I said to be honest and print the full amount, since there shouldn't be any duties importing into the U.S.

      It seemed weird that he even asked this question. If he makes a living by selling these things to other countries, shouldn't he know whether the U.S. charges duties or not?

      Unfortunately, my monitor did not work as well as this guy's. It was DOA, and I had to send it back for a refund. :(

      --
      Free unix account: freeshell.org
  12. Re:USA by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2, Informative

    to sell here, you MUST implement 'display protection' (its not copy protection; lets call it what it really is).

    but, if they sell direct from overseas, they can skip this.

    its a known loophole in many areas. you can even bypass U/L style testing (or CE testing) if you are just selling stuff over direct mail or ebay.

    some of the stuff I've gotton direct from china would NOT NOT NOT pass U/L if its life depended on it. I stopped using some gear since, when I opened it, I found the wiring and parts locations to be unsafe (heat buildup, etc).

    and so, you take a greater chance when you bypass some of the 'manuf standards' that are enforced on local sales.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  13. No HDCP == Good. by ickleberry · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They can take their huddlecup DRM and shove it up their arse, do not want precious silicon I'm paying good money wasted on features aiming to restrict me and make the MPAA more money.

    I'm glad I found this thread because I might well be going to Korea in september so I'll bring one of these monitors back with me and not pay for shipping. Once again "fuck you" to HDCP and its supporters.

  14. Re:IPS displays are slow by synapse7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These monitors (according TTFA) have no image processor and therefor have a fast response and are good for gaming.

  15. Re:USA by EvanED · · Score: 2, Informative

    to sell here, you MUST implement 'display protection' (its not copy protection; lets call it what it really is).

    [citation needed]

    IANAL, but to my knowledge selling a display without HDCP or whatever isn't in violation of the DMCA, it just won't be able to display content that requires HDCP. That's different from actively circumventing HDCP.

    (Also "display protection" isn't any better a term.)

  16. Re:USA by HarrySquatter · · Score: 2

    What a load of BS. The Auria EQ276W doesn't have HDCP and is sold in the US.

  17. Are you sure? Microcenter claims it does by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Informative

    Microcenter Specs page for the EQ276W claims it supports HDCP. The one reviewed in the article did not...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  18. Re:Sweet by msauve · · Score: 4, Funny

    "I bought a simian two weeks ago, it has hdcp."

    Do you get a discount when buying a handicapped monkey?

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  19. Re:LOL by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The one that I got gave a phone number and the address of the manufacturer (Yamakasi) in the back of the user manual, along with a map so you could drive up to the manufacturer and get a replacement.

    In my case, it didn't even work out of the box, though. I sent it back to the Ebay seller, who claimed that it worked for him, but then stopped responding to my messages. I just filed a Ebay case, and got a full refund, but that same guy is still the main person selling these on Ebay.

    --
    Free unix account: freeshell.org
  20. From A Satisfied Customer by BaldingByMicrosoft · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'll make this short and sweet.

    I got mine here:
    http://www.ebay.com/itm/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=230774446127&ssPageName=ADME:L:OC:US:3160

    It is the most amazing and beautiful screen I've ever owned, and I've actively been a computer geek for 34 years. It arrived in 2 days. There are no dead pixels. I've used it for hours daily since mid-April with no problems.

    Have a nice day.

  21. Re:Not tha impressive by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

    You can thank Samsung for your high quality iPad display. They designed and built it.

  22. Re:Buy local by Guspaz · · Score: 2

    And Dell is currently selling the U2412M, a 24" IPS display with 1920x1200 resolution, for $250... What's your point? A 23" 1080p ASUS IPS for $270 isn't a good deal.

  23. Re:LOL by pakar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can't wait to have one of these on a phone or tablet.

    Are you happy to see me or is that a 27" screen in your pocket?

  24. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I bought a Yamakasi Catleap 27" screen from bigclothcraft on Ebay, $330 Australian dollars delivered to my door by courier. Took only about 4 days from Korea.
    I could not get the screen to work with either of my two PCs. I tried different DVI cables, different PCs, different video cards, no joy. All video cards detected the new screen, just nothing actually showed up on the screen. I eventually complained to bigclothcraft and they offered to pay for the return of the screen using their courier service account, which I thought was decent of them, however they did say that if it worked on arrival back in Korea they would charge me for the return courier service.
    I then had one last go at getting the screen to work, this time using their supplied DVI cable rather than my own cables I had been using up to this point. Somehow this disabled the video drivers for my card (NVidia GTX560) but at least the screen illuminated and showed a low-res image. After reloading the drivers for my video card, the screen worked. Absolutely gorgeous picture, colours are great, haven't noticed any dead pixels.
    Another oddity is that it will NOT work as a dual display, as soon as I have another screen plugged into my video card the Yamakasi goes blank. Since I only want a single display this is not an issue for me, but still it's a bit odd.
    Last gripe is that the base seems a bit plasticky and flimsy, but I can live with that.
    For way less than half the price of a 27" 2560x1440 bought locally, I am very happy with it, but be advised there are a few non-critical weird issues. YMMV.
    Cheers,
    John

  25. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Could it be that your cables were all single-link DVI and your video card doesn't support multiple monitors when connected to a dual-link monitor?

  26. Re:Buy local by yeshuawatso · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...and four inches smaller... it's a completely different product.

    That's what she said.

  27. large monitor caused serious alteration of my eyes by lkcl · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ok. can i suggest that you actually get three 1280x1024 4:3 aspect ratio monitors instead? if you don't like 3, get 4 instead. the reason is very simple: after working constantly at my usual 10-12 hours per day in front of an apple 22in 1920x1200 LCD for 18 months, i now have severe "prism" on my eyes. that means that in the dark if i look at a point of light more than 2 metres away i *cannot* bring it into focus: i see 2 dots about 4 inches apart (at 2 metres).

    my eyes have always "adjusted" to the LCDs/CRTs that i use (25 years so far), and so i was quite pissed off to learn 10 years ago - a long while before computer usage was as common as it is now - that opticians go "oh we hear that people with short-sighted glasses tend to be used to having clear vision, so we always add -0.25 diopters on just to be cautious" and fuck me if the fucking morons didn't make my eyes *worse* by 0.25 diopters every time i got new glasses.

    why is that? well it's quite simple: looking at the screens, my eyes adjust to look at the screens. then the moronic opticians slap another -0.25 diopters on the prescription and my eyes... adjust accordingly. by age 36 i had -4.0 in both eyes, put on the new glasses and drove at night to where i was staying, and they were so bad that i had an instant headache that lasted for something like a day and a half. that was money well spent: i had to use the older glasses.

    so the same thing has happened here, with this 22in mac (which is of course running debian gnu/linux, what else would it be running, duh??) - because i have been sitting in front of it for 18 months at a distance of only about 15in. my eyes can perfectly well flick to the left corner or the right, and get the correct focus instantaneously.

    but if i put my glasses on and look out the window into the distance, and roll my head one way and then the other, still looking straight out the window, you can literally see my eyes "jump" as one of them moves faster than the other, and i cannot pull them together into focus. the reason is because my eyes were *expecting* to be focussing (at 45 degrees or so) on something at only about 16-18 in away, but i asked them to look instead (at 45 degrees or so) at something 20 metres away: they can't do it. it also turns out that it's not just the muscles / reflexes that have adjusted, it's the actual shape of my eye lenses. they literally point sideways (inwards - aka "prism") now, not straight ahead.

    the bottom line is that you really REALLY have to watch out for these kinds of effects which _are_ reversible... you just have to quit your job as a highly-paid computer professional and go do something like work behind a cash register, or go be a farmer or a common labourer or god forbid a politician - *anything* but stare at screens from a distance of under 2 metres, and you'll get your eyesight back to normal after a couple of years.

  28. single link dual link with a dual link single link by nazsco · · Score: 3, Insightful

    when did cables got so retarded?

  29. Re:single link dual link with a dual link single l by davester666 · · Score: 3, Funny

    about 1 minute after cables were invented and the person realized they could use either the same or different cables for different things, depending on how cheap or specific they wanted the cable to be to their application

    To answer your followup question, regarding connectors, see my answer for cables.

    I especially love how my APC BX1300G UPS is described as having an "Interface Port USB", which in reality, the device has an Ethernet connector [but does not support any networking protocol], with a cable that has a ethernet plug on one end and a USB plug on the other. I'm sure to be able to run down to the local store and replace it if this one ever gets damaged or lost.

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  30. You are the reason things are expensive by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Informative

    Idiots like you who refuse to read the manual. High-rez monitors require dual link DVI. You used old single link DVI cables instead of the supplied dual link cable.

    Rather then just think or do some research, you cost the company support costs that everyone has to pay for even if they are not as stupid as you.

    I really wish support costs were simply done through the costs of the phone call or paid for emails, so people who can read don't have to pay for the terminally stupid.

    It is the main reason Dell isn't really cheap, all the support costs people generate is what separates hardware costs from the selling price. Yes, your printer doesn't work? Did you plug in the power? No? That will be ten dollars please to pay the poor guy having to deal with it.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:You are the reason things are expensive by nedlohs · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sure, if you know nothing about DVI. But then you should be buying it from from a place that provides guidance rather than a cheaper place that lets you work out that if the resolution is higher than the single link DVI standard allows then it won't work with a single link DVI cable.