Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Best Way To Take Notes In the Modern Classroom?

Krau Ming writes "After about eight years spent in research, I've made the decision to go back to school — medical school. When I last spent the bulk of my days sitting in lectures, I took notes with paper, and if the professor wasn't technologically impaired, he/she would have posted powerpoint slides as a PDF online for us to print and make our notes on. Since it has been so long, I am looking for some options other than the ol' pen and paper. Is there an effective way of taking notes with a laptop? What about tablet options? Are there note-taking programs that can handle a variety of file types (eg: electronic textbooks, powerpoint slides, PDFs)? Or should I just sleep in and get the lectures posted online and delay learning the course material until the exam (kidding)?"

52 of 364 comments (clear)

  1. 8 years ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Such a long time, did they already have pen and paper?
    I can't remember, so much has changed.

    1. Re:8 years ago... by quantumghost · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Such a long time, did they already have pen and paper? I can't remember, so much has changed.

      Hmmmm....Actually went to medical school > 8 years ago....let me detail somethings that most may not know about it....

      1st year for a "traditional" medical school, fall semester is usually biochem and anatomy....both usually involve a lot of diagrams and less note taking. Your prof may or may not have handouts....ours used slides and were just transitioning to powerpoint....no joke...but think about it...not much of that information has changed over the years....esp for anatomy. Biochem, they add on for a (very) few new disease processed, and recently added the HMGCoA pathway.

      Spring is usually histology and physiology....again histo is a lot of drawing of cells. Physio is less so, but more flow chart like diagrams. Micro...some note taking some diagrams....Neuro science...._lots_ of diagrams....

      2nd year....hardly anyone goes to class....our second year class room was ~1/3 the size of the first year....so small that the entire 2nd year class could not fit into the lecture hall at the same time. I am neither joking nor exaggerating. Fall is pharm...good for notetaking...as is path....spring is a continuation of path and intro clinical medicine....again both are ok for note-taking.

      The problem here is also that most schools still have a note-service....this is where someone is responsible for taping the lectures and distributing them out for people to review and type out the notes....the original crowd-sourcing. This is usually why most realize that going to class is rarely helpful.

      3rd year....clinicals...ha - forget about note taking....you're on the move constantly, and scribbling furiously on a scrap of paper, and mostly reading out of a pocket sized book when you have those rare moments of down time....that or you're sleeping. The few lectures you have, you'll be too busy eating, or catching up on sleep. No...not kidding here either.

      4th year....you pick easy electives, finish your core classes.....the fall you're off interviewing for residency, you hardly ever take notes..."'cause you know it all" already. You're just killing time til you match and then killing more time til you graduate.

      Intern year.....you realize you know squat -- just like 3rd year of med school, but now you actually have responsibility! You never get a chance to sit through a lecture cause you're damn pager is going off...during rounds the orders are barked out so quickly, you'll only be able to jot 1/2 of it down on any available scrap of paper....you'll devise your own system of how to handle this....and I assure you....it will not be electronically.

      2nd year....you actually find that you did learn something the previous year (must have been via diffusion)....but now you're the one barking orders, or you have a much better idea of what's coming so you rarely have to write much down.

      Just my $0.02....YMMV

      Source: Spent the last 9 years as a resident/fellow and the 4 years prior to that as a med student....and saw everyone else doing the _same_exact_thing_.

    2. Re:8 years ago... by woodendogwonder · · Score: 2

      The 5 successful medical students that I know did M1 and M2 this way: Contact the medical school. They most likely professionally record and stream the lectures and have the slides posted online. Don't go to class unless travel time is less than 10 minutes. Watch the lectures in comfort at home at 1.5x, and pause to annotate the printed slides as-needed. Come up with a system for colored highlighting and cross-referencing the lectures, slides, and book material. Take books to office max and have them de-bound and 3-hole-punched. Organize binders by subject. The expense here is in the binders, binding services, a good laser printer, and a comfortable yet upright chair that can withstand 18-hours per day of sitting. There are a number of artificial intelligence notebooks that cross-reference notes automatically. I use DevonThink for CSE grad school notes. An all-digital workflow is hindered by the need to digitize textbooks. Instead of 3-hole punching the de-bound textbooks, you could pay a friend to run them through a scanner with an auto-sheet feeder and batch OCR them to PDF. File sharing services most likely will only contain out-dated editions. Hence, you are most likely stuck with annotating lecture slides as the central index to the lectures and text book references.

  2. Stick With What Works by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If it were me, I'd stick to good ol' fashioned carbon on paper. I find my ability to retain information increases greatly if I write it down myself, manually.

    Of course, YMMV, not everybody learns the same way.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    1. Re:Stick With What Works by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I find my ability to retain information increases greatly if I pay attention. If I'm writing, I'm not paying attention, I'm just a passive conduit for words going in my ears and out my fingers. If I do take notes, I generally find myself wondering what the hell I meant. Better to just pay attention in class and read the text. Notes are worthless.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:Stick With What Works by Sonny+Yatsen · · Score: 2

      I second the pen and paper note-taking suggestion. I've found that if I type my notes in class, I spend more time transcribing every word the lecturer says instead of paying attention to the lecture and noting down the points that are important. Of course, you can always ask the lecturer if you can record the class if you need the crutch.

      --
      My postings are informational and does not constitute legal advice. Act on it at your risk.
    3. Re:Stick With What Works by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      I find my ability to retain information increases greatly if I pay attention. If I'm writing, I'm not paying attention, I'm just a passive conduit for words going in my ears and out my fingers. If I do take notes, I generally find myself wondering what the hell I meant. Better to just pay attention in class and read the text. Notes are worthless.

      As I said,

      Of course, YMMV, not everybody learns the same way.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    4. Re:Stick With What Works by Baloroth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No offense but maybe your brain just fails to multitask.

      Assuming he is a human, of course his brain does. As does yours, mine, and Stephen Hawking's. No human brain can actually multitask. Some people are just faster at switching between one task and another than others.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    5. Re:Stick With What Works by Bill+Dimm · · Score: 2

      I used to be puzzled by the fact that I often fell asleep during lectures at conferences, but I never fell asleep in class as a student. I eventually realized that I didn't fall asleep in class because I was taking notes instead of just sitting there. Of course, YMMV if you aren't as perpetually sleep-deprived as I am.

    6. Re:Stick With What Works by camperdave · · Score: 2

      Paying attention is definitely a requirement, but I find that by taking notes I retain stuff longer, even if I never look at the notes. The reason is that you have to process the information to convert it from aural to written. Without that step, information "goes in one ear and out the other".

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    7. Re:Stick With What Works by Genda · · Score: 5, Funny

      Bring a point and shoot with a 12 MP res or higher, and video the course. Take high res snap shots of chalkboard or displays depending on presentation. That evening, edit video to just the stuff that matters. pump what you want through "Dragon; Naturally Speaking". edit, and highlight the text, imbed snap shots. Date the seminar with the video highlights and place in a neatly marked folder. Reread/View notes over the weekend, you remember more. If you can take you textbooks in digital form, you have a perfect way of making your class a part of a larger digital library. Better yet, break the content into smaller bits, store chucks in a database and add metadata for search. The act of managing the data will demand that you understand it so you can parse its nature and properly store it. Each section of each class will have its notes, classroom video, images, book information, scanned handouts, chapter questions, pop quizzes. In short, everything you need for the mid term and final, to pass with flying colors.

    8. Re:Stick With What Works by omnichad · · Score: 2

      And most single-core CPU's don't either, but that doesn't mean we haven't had "multi-tasking" in Windows for over a decade and a half.

    9. Re:Stick With What Works by Sir+Holo · · Score: 2

      Pen and paper. Nothing beats it.

      It forces you to paraphrase what the instructor is saying.

      The whole point of a lecture is that you run the ideas through your brain. (Pen and paper forces this.) No electronic device will ever replace forcing your brain to process what you are hearing and seeing during a lecture.

    10. Re:Stick With What Works by PeanutButterBreath · · Score: 2

      No offense but maybe your brain just fails to multitask.

      And maybe that is why he is able to perceive that pretending to multitask is inferior to concentrating on the most important task at hand, and organizing one's effort around the reality of the human brain.

      E.g. During class, focus on absorbing the material being presented. Later, with recording of class if necessary, make effective notes with the leisure of being able to pause in order to record notes on whatever media is best suited to writing things down to confirm comprehension (no more "WTF was I writing here?") and for future reference.

    11. Re:Stick With What Works by RedBear · · Score: 3, Funny

      No offense but maybe your brain just fails to multitask.

      No offense, but maybe you're a narcissistic, egotistical ignoramus who thinks he's some kind of ubermensch because he can walk and chew gum at the same time.

      No offense.

    12. Re:Stick With What Works by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 2

      I second the pen and paper note-taking suggestion. I've found that if I type my notes in class, I spend more time transcribing every word the lecturer says instead of paying attention to the lecture and noting down the points that are important. Of course, you can always ask the lecturer if you can record the class if you need the crutch.

      My problem with typing notes (as opposed to hand writing them) is that I spend far too much time spell/grammar checking my notes, and end up completely missing large chunks of the lecture. Not to diss the idea completey - It would probably be a far more viable method for someone who's not an O.C.D. Grammar Nazi like I am.

      The *point* of the pencil-and-paper not taking is that you ingest the information and analyze it to decide which points in the lecture are worth writing down because either

      • you won't easily remember them
      • they're likely to be needed for tests or homework
      • or you don't understand them and you will need to do further research or ask the professor

      This is a greatly more active role in learning than you will achieve by either sitting in class without taking notes or by recording the entire lecture or grabbing the lecture notes off the professor's web page. And that's why it can be effective. But it's only effective if you take notes in such an analytic way. If you try to write down everything (some people can, using shorthand). there's not enough thinking involved and you will retain less information in your head and less-useful notes.

  3. Livescribe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I use Livescribe pens at work and I love it. I wish that the pens were available when I was in university because they are ideal for taking lecture notes. http://www.livescribe.com/en-us/

    1. Re:Livescribe by mark_reh · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I went through a year of my didactic classes in dental school using a livescribe pen exclusively. Almost all lectures were done with power point so my notes mostly consisted of writing down slide numbers whenever a slide was changed. The pen links the text to the audio so when i review the ppts if I wanted to know what was being said while a particular slide was on-screen I could just tap the slide number int he notes and get the info straight from the horse's mouth. Whenever the work test was mentioned in the context of "this is going to be on the test", I wrote the word "test". If someone asked a good question and/or received a good answer I wrote "listen". The other thing that is great is the software on the computer searches your handwritten text and highlights wherever you wrote the searched-for text. When I want to find all those instances of the word "test" in my notes, the desktop software finds them for me and I can click and hear all the relevant info without having to listen to two hours of lecture.

      It really made studying and note taking easy and was completely reliable. My 1 GB pen held about 3 weeks worth of all-day, every-day lectures.

      I still use the pen for my "engineering" notebook so I'll have copies of whatever I write on ym computer.

  4. Pen and paper is the best by dehole · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sorry to discourage you, but I have found that using pen and paper is the best way to take notes. Why? Maybe it helps your brain process what your trying to learn. It could be that it is distraction free. I know that it is the simplest way to take notes, and often times, the simplest is the best.

    1. Re:Pen and paper is the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Plus it allows you to practice crappy physician handwriting.

    2. Re:Pen and paper is the best by LionKimbro · · Score: 3, Informative

      Me neither, until I discovered (ta-dah!) "Correction Tape" ..!

      It's fantastic, and I swear by it.

    3. Re:Pen and paper is the best by alphax45 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Plus it's tasty! :P

      --
      K Man
  5. With force? =) by colin_faber · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just wait until your buddy finishes taking notes, then take them.

    1. Re:With force? =) by sonamchauhan · · Score: 2

      Are you kidding ... this is doctor's handwriting we're talking about.

  6. Reminds me a story my dad told me... by DarthVain · · Score: 4, Funny

    So apparently the technology of the time of personal tape recorders. Not sure if this was his undergrad or law school, but I guess a lot of students rather than attending a long lecure would come in, drop off a tape recorder, press record, and then leave. Apparerently it got so bad that then one day he was late for class or something, and when he got there, the entire classroom was just a bunch of tape recorders recording, and at the front (I can only assume in protest) the prof had brought his own taped lecture and was simply playing it out of his own device!

    A sort of analog information transfer...

    1. Re:Reminds me a story my dad told me... by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

      the prof had brought his own taped lecture and was simply playing it out of his own device!

      Or maybe your dad just saw Real Genius.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Reminds me a story my dad told me... by kat_skan · · Score: 4, Funny

      Have you considered the possibility that your dad is Val Kilmer?

    3. Re:Reminds me a story my dad told me... by localman57 · · Score: 2

      Yeah. But the guy he calls "Dad" doesn't know anything about it.

  7. I still prefer pen & paper by Tridus · · Score: 2

    The act of actually writing helps me to remember the information, particularly since I can't write fast enough to just copy down what's said verbatim and have to think about what to record. In addition, pens are cheap, easily replaced if lost or broken, and don't give you a very tempting distraction in the form of the Internet.

    YMMV of course, but that's what works for me.

    --
    -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
  8. Paper and pencil still trumps all others. by logicassasin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have a child about to attend college in the fall. I've already told her to take more notes on paper than with the laptop she's going to get soon. Why? I pulled out my chemistry, calc, and Pascal notes from college courses taken over 20 years ago and showed them to her. One look at them and she understood what I was talking about.

    Drawings for chem experiments, flowcharts with notation for my programs, and clear notes with plenty of examples from calc made her understand. The stuff I did with paper and pencil back then would not be easy to replicate as quickly with a laptop. She understands now.

    --
    Fifty watts per channel, baby cakes.
    1. Re:Paper and pencil still trumps all others. by bsDaemon · · Score: 2

      Not to mention the fact that 20 years later you could still access the information in its original format without having to hunt down expensive converters for out-dated technology. There's a reason paper has been around for thousands of years and is still in use.

  9. Livescribe by Jabes · · Score: 4, Informative

    I find the livescribe system brilliant. It is pen and paper, but it records audio and you can transfer your scribblings to computer. The audio and your writing are synced up so you can touch on any part of your writing either on the paper or on the computer and jump to the audio at the time you wrote it.

  10. Using a Butterfly by DeeEff · · Score: 2

    What, you don't use butterflies to write your notes? Get off my lawn, you petulant n00b!

  11. Re:Really depends if you'll ever use the notes by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

    (Take the test, recycle the notes.)

    .. and by 'recycle,' he of course means 'sell on the internet'

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  12. MS OneNote by foeclan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you're on Windows, Microsoft OneNote is fantastic. You can drag in other files as printouts, then write on them. The text of the printouts is searchable. The individual note pages can be organized in numerous ways (I have tab groups for semester, tabs for classes, then subtabs for each lecture). It can record and transcribe notes, does handwriting conversion, allows writing using a mouse or tablet pen (I use it on a ThinkPad Tablet PC, which makes it even handier).

    With a tablet PC, I've used it to write mathematical and chemical formulas directly in my notes, or highlight parts of diagrams from lecture notes or even just dragged from websites (or cut with the snipping tool; with OneNote installed, you can use windows-S as a shortcut key to the snipping tool and past things into your document). You can also export your notes as PDFs.

    OneNote has been remarkably useful in undergrad and now in grad school. I highly recommend it. I'm always kind of boggled that MS doesn't market it better; it just sort of 'comes with' Office and they don't really advertise that well.

  13. Evernote and it's ilk by Conception · · Score: 2

    Evernote is pretty fantastic for organizing notes and then, unlike with pen and paper, you have the ability to attach pdfs, websites, etc etc and search through all of them.

  14. No Note Taking by c0d3r · · Score: 2

    At Cal, they used to give us the notes to the class so you spend your time thinking, not taking notes.

  15. Tablet PC by Missing.Matter · · Score: 5, Informative

    I know Slashdot loves to hate the Tablet PC, but I went through college with it (physics + computer engineering) and graduate school now doing by (PhD computer engineering). I've also tried the iPad in my graduate work, since those didn't exist when I did my undergrad. So let me give you an idea of how I used both and how they worked out for me.

    Tablet PC was a Dell Latitude XT. It has a capacitive multi-touch screen and an inductive stylus digitizer. It used Windows 7 as the OS, and my primary method of taking notes was Microsoft One Note. I digitized all my books, and bought digital copies where I could. During class, I had my books open, and when the prof. would reference diagrams or specific sections, I would clip them and paste them into my notes, annotating them there. When the professor had powerpoints available before hand, I would load them into one note and annotate there. The benefit was I could after the fact scan and recognize my handwriting (which I could train the computer to learn to a very high accuracy). Also, with one note you can put tags on specific sections or notes. These tags can be compiled into a summary, so I would typically tag equations or definitions and create quick reference study guides this way. This computer doubled as my work computer so I also installed word, excel, powerpoint, and matlab for homework and presentations. For presentations, powerpoint was especially useful with presenter view and inking capability.

    The iPad was much less useful than the Tablet PC for me. I couldn't have two windows open side by side, so clipping segments from PDF to notes was not feasible. Also, the iPad doesn't have a digitizer, so it uses capacitive input for writing. The styluses are huge, and inaccurate, and your palm often causes inaccurate marks. Further, the handwriting recognition in most apps is either nonexistent or terrible. Finally working with fellow students was a pain with the iPad, since the file manager is completely closed off. We couldn't just pass around a USB drive or network our computer together, everything had to be done via drop box, and even then I couldn't open most of the formats they were trying to send me. Printing was also impossible on my campus with the iPad, and connecting to a projector can be problematic. You can't just screen share the iPad with an external display like you can a Windows computer; the particular app has to support that feature.

    Now, I think if I were to do it all again I would get a Windows 8 device with a stylus like the Surface Pro. It will run all my windows apps like Office and Matlab, connect to all my devices, network with all the same computers, but have all the touch niceties and touch based apps when it's in tablet mode. The Surface Pro is pretty much what I was hoping the iPad would be, only 3 years later, and honestly if I were doing it all over again, that's where I would start (or a device like it from one of the OEMs). Price and battery life are still up in the air, but they're both most assuredly better than what I paid for my Latitude XT, which I have never regretted buying due to its usefulness.

    1. Re:Tablet PC by Missing.Matter · · Score: 2

      I only had an iPad 1, so my comments and experience are ignorant of the changes made after it. However as far as I know, it still does not have an active digitizer, still does not have the ability to use multiple apps side by side, still does not have an open file system, still does not have wide peripheral and software compatibility, which was the bulk of the usefulness of the tablet. Please correct me again if I am wrong on these points.

    2. Re:Tablet PC by Pigeon451 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      +1, totally agree. Typical tablets aren't great for taking notes. Maybe for annotating PDFs, but beyond that, not much use. If Onenote was ported to Android or Apple then it might be OK, but still limited by the OS.

      A tablet PC is much better, as it's a real computer with a touch screen. Combine that with Microsoft Onenote and you have a very powerful (albeit expensive) note taking machine. Onenote is excellent at digitizing your scribbles so you can search for it later. It even has audio transcription, but I've never tried it. You can have Onenote documents open over multiple computers (via Dropbox or Microsoft's own service) and they all update seamlessly.

      I'm not a big fan of Microsoft's bloated products, but Onenote is a wonderful program.

  16. To paraphrase Mitch Hedberg by kat_skan · · Score: 5, Funny

    I bought a hundred-dollar pen because I always lose pens and I was sick of not caring.

  17. Go high-tech by gman003 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is a bit high-tech, but I've had good results with it.

    You're going to need a cylinder of compressed graphite, roughly .5mm in diameter and 5cm in length. Encapsulate it in some ablative material (preferably a renewable organic material) for better grip and structural integrity.

    Use this implement to store data on a flexible two-dimensional lattice. The graphite will slowly be worn down as it is deposited on the surface - you will need to continually ablate more of the cover.

    Data removal is handled either by disposing of the lattice itself (for bulk erase), or by use of a specialized tool (often attached to one end of the data write implement) for small deletes - although I will note that, after sufficient rewrite cycles, data may be unreadable.

    This offers many advantages over traditional computer-based storage. It is far lower-power, functioning off a few milliwatts of energy. It allows for highly flexible unstructured data storage (sort of like NoSQL), and can be improved rapidly by agile development, as no data standards are enforced. I often use a system of my own design to encrypt data by use of an alternative character set (the Unicode committee has, unfortunately, declined to add it to the standard). It also allows more rapid and accurate entry of non-textual or rich-text data.

    The only drawbacks are a rather inefficient system for video storage, and it can become rather bulky (while not as dense as the old computer systems, they often have similar or even higher mass). But those are rather minor drawbacks given all the advantages.

    1. Re:Go high-tech by camperdave · · Score: 2

      I prefer a device consisting of four plastic tubules within an outer housing. At the egress end of the inner tubes is a sphere, which rolls along the flexible two dimensional lattice, and transfers a chromatic fluid contained within the tube to the aforementioned surface. At the opposite end of these tubules there is a metal spring and a plastic cap possessing specially shaped projections. It is not coincidental that the color of the plastic cap matches the chromatic characteristics of the fluid contained within the tubule. The device makes use of the springs and specially shaped projections to create a retraction and selection mechanism. This mechanism allows the user to select a single tubule for use while the other tubules are withdrawn within the outer housing for protection. The use of multiple chromatic fluids allows for greater semantic organization of the information being imparted to the surface.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    2. Re:Go high-tech by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2

      Another great thing about this system that wasn't mentioned is it's got full support for internationalization. Any language you want, it's supported - even ones not invented yet! I'm studying Japanese, and a lot of the techno solutions presented here won't work as well. *sigh* Part of studying Japanese also involves learning to write those weird-looking characters, so you HAVE to practice the writing, anyway. The sooner your start reading and writing it in the native characters, the faster you'll be acquiring your new language.

  18. iOS has a note taking app with that ability by 0x537461746943 · · Score: 2

    http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/audionote-notepad-voice-recorder/id369820957?mt=8 "...Each note acts as a link directly to the point at which it was recorded, taking you instantly to what you want to hear! Didn't take any notes during the meeting? No problem, you can add them later!"

  19. It's not HOW you take notes, it's WHAT you take. by boristdog · · Score: 2

    Generally, you only need to know about 10% of what comes out of the profs mouth. The rest is just extra examples and fluff.

    Back in school I had friends who would write down EVERYTHING the prof would say without thinking. (Seriously, one girl I knew would write down what the professor said when greeting the class. I saw "Happy Wednesday, gang! Anyone seen my pointer?" atop one page.) These people took REAMS of notes and studied them for hours and hours. I took minimal notes and studied them quickly. I usually made much better grades. Not because I am a genius, but because I know WHEN something is important. THAT is the skill you need.

    Also, sit in the front, you are forced to pay attention.

  20. This was my job by supercrisp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the past my job was teaching students about note-taking. I haven't read the current research in a while, at least more than for fun, but here's the upshot as I know it. Take notes. Pencil and paper is probably best because it's the least prone to break and because it can be the most free-form. But the tool is not as important as what you do with it. Don't be slavish. Just take down the high points. Use the recto and the verso. The recto is for in-class, the "note-taking"; the verso is for after class, the "note-taking" most students don't do. This is for notes in which you interpret, summarize, and clarify. Basically it's for reprocessing and setting-up for further review. Then review material frequently at irregular intervals. In a given study session, work on the verso for that day, then review material from the same day a week ago and the same day from one month ago. Also, the best time to study is just prior to some sleep, either the night's sleep or a nap of at least 15-20 minutes. Now, in my experience, many students will respond: Oh no Dr. C____, I'm special/different/exceptional. I'll be more blunt here, in the interest of space: no you're not. At least there are no studies suggesting that any other methods than I've described are more effective. Feel free to supplement with tape-recordings, etc. But remember the main ideas of limited recording, reinterpretation, and frequent review at irregular interviews. (An added brief note: the research is building that, with very, very few exceptions, no one is a "visual" or "verbal" learner; that's mostly 70s touch-feely bullshit. But most people do learn well if they use multiple media for information storage and retrieval. This could be as simple as notes with words and diagrams. And that brings me back to the pencil and the paper.)

  21. Cameraphone by ace37 · · Score: 2

    Usually my classes are taught by an instructor with a whiteboard.

    I pay attention to and interact on the discussion, then periodically snap a photo of the whiteboard now and then with my cameraphone. With an 8MP or so typical smartphone, I can pretty much always crop the photo and read the board easily. The date and time are embedded in the image, so I can easily filter them by lecture (and cross check syllabus for topics) without doing any work. I usually review the image notes before an exam and that's about it. And I never have paper notes to file or dump at the end of the semester.

    I find this enables me to pay more attention and interact more during the lecture, which is where I learn the best. Others learn well from transcribing the information; I don't and never have. YMMV.

  22. Re:Dont take notes. Listen. by Antipater · · Score: 2

    That's great advice for whatever percentage of the population are auditory learners. For other people, writing down what you hear enhances your recall of it, especially if you copy it into a more legible format after class (akin to your taking 15 mins to summarize). I had friends in college who could have been deaf for all they got out of listening, but they learned everything they needed from the blackboard and the online notes. I had other friends (most of them, actually, since a large majority of engineering students are haptic learners) who couldn't make heads or tails of lectures OR notes until they actually saw an example or did their homework - and after that they'd mastered it.

    Different people learn very differently. Blanket statements like "take notes this way" or "just listen, don't write" will work for some people and will be awful for others.

    --
    Everything is better with chainsaws.
  23. Don't take notes by Intropy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Focus on trying to understand what is being said rather than distracting yourself with trying to record a summary or the highlights. If there's something you need clarified or that doesn't seem to fit to you, ask about it. You'll be solidifying your own understanding of the material and probably helping about a few other students in the same position as you. Other reference resources such as passed out notes or a textbook will be available to you that you can peruse in your own time.

  24. Unfortunately, there is no "modern" way. by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Anyone suggesting using a laptop should be shot. Transcribing your professors words into verbatim text is NOT learning. The laptop fails in the lecture hall for many reasons. It is difficult to inject your own thoughts about the subject matter when you are too busy trying to get every last word the professor is saying, and it is far to tempting to do so. You cannot easily switch to a "drawing" function to draw down diagrams or annotate your notes. Also they are loud, large and annoying hearing the clicking of keys everywhere. If you are taking notes using a laptop, you are not taking good notes, period.

    Anyone suggesting using an iPad with stylus should be shot. Steve Job's made it very clear that Apple tablets are not supposed to use pen input, and so pen input on the iPad is a shitty experience. The input resolution of the iPad is way too low, so you can't take anything better then grade school looking chalk lines and Fisher Price looking diagrams. iPad's on screen keyboard is horrible for any kind of note taking.

    Most "other" tablets have failed to include decent handwriting tools. Pen input on tablets is too slow and inaccurate to match pen/paper experience. Electronic Pen input forces you to compromise, either due to the lousiness of the hardware or the shiftiness of the software.

    Best experience is to use good ol' fashioned pen and paper. Why:

    Slows you down, makes you think about what is being said rather then madly transcribing words. Using pen and paper you should be putting your OWN thoughts and words down about the subject matter, not someone else's.

    Easy to draw/diagram/annotate. In a math/science course, you will dump using a laptop or tablet simply because the subject matter is just not easy to transcribe to text.

    Easy to annotate after the fact. If the professor linked a point previously made it is very easy to go back with pen and paper to add additional notes at the point they where taken.

    I have lousy hand writing so I always took notes twice, once in the lecture hall and then would spend a little bit of time after class cleaning up the notes. Forced me to think twice about the lecture and so could add/update the notes.

    When I took hand written notes, I actually could remember when points where made and easily find them, even weeks or months later. Using a laptop I found one page looked exactly like another so trying to find some point made during a lecture 3 months ago was impossible.

    While their is a certain appeal of using technology to take lecture notes, realize that the lecture process has not changed in hundreds of years. A boring old fart droning on about largely irrelevant information doesn't require 21st century note taking tech.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  25. For Medicine you just need to read read read by sapgau · · Score: 2

    If you are in Medicine, you will be wasting your time taking more than a page of notes.
    There is such an incredible amount of information in all things medical that you just have to decide what material to read that will match your Teacher's theme and topics. You can probably download somebody else's notes that highlights the important points, pharma doses, lab figures, etc.

    You have to read, review, listen to videos and then read some more. Take a look at what Kaplan offers for example.