Slashdot Mirror


Bitcoin-Based Drug Market Silk Road Thriving With $2 Million In Monthly Sales

Sparrowvsrevolution writes "Every day or so of the last six months, Carnegie Mellon computer security professor Nicolas Christin has crawled and scraped Silk Road, the Tor- and Bitcoin-based underground online market for illegal drug sales. Now Christin has released a paper (PDF) on his findings, which show that the site's business is booming: its number of sellers, who offer everything from cocaine to ecstasy, has jumped from around 300 in February to more than 550. Its total sales now add up to around $1.9 million a month. And its operators generate more than $6,000 a day in commissions for themselves, compared with around $2,500 in February. Most surprising, perhaps, is that buyers rate the sellers on the site as relatively trustworthy, despite the fact that no real identities are used. Close to 98% of ratings on the site are positive."

36 of 498 comments (clear)

  1. And in countries where it's legal? by crazyjj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know, generally speaking, the underground only thrives when there is a vacuum to be filled.

    I wonder how many violent drug cartels, gun-toting dealers, and drug-related shootings there are in countries where it's legal to buy from a pharmacy or dispensary.

    --
    What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    1. Re:And in countries where it's legal? by bhagwad · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Though there aren't many countries allowing you to buy it legally, I agree that it SHOULD be legal. Let people take responsibility for their own lives and allow them to kill themselves if they wish to.

    2. Re:And in countries where it's legal? by Moheeheeko · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You mean like Alchohol?

    3. Re:And in countries where it's legal? by RoknrolZombie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, then you criminalize the actual CRIME - driving while impaired. You can't criminalize behavior that's not criminal. It's like saying you can't buy a car because it *might* be used in the commission of a crime. There are thousands of things that are already illegal that pretty much cover the bases - everything from reckless driving to child safety...these laws are perfectly capable of punishing real criminals instead of filling our prisons with responsible users.

    4. Re:And in countries where it's legal? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Tell that to all the people on the bus that die when the bus driver wrecks the bus because he/she is high. Or the on coming car that runs into the bus because the driver of the car is high. I doubt that the person taking the drugs would necessarily be the only one to die as a result of their actions.

      That anecdote would hold far more weight if not for the immense number of people killed on the roads every year by drivers who aren't high on illegal drugs.

      To that end... put down the goddamn cell phone.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    5. Re:And in countries where it's legal? by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Here in reality, believe it or not, the medical route is actually cheaper.

      Clean needle programs, access to cheap clean drugs and treating addiction as a medical problem not a criminal one is cheaper and actually works. I know it lacks that self righteous feeling, and that is a downside, but it actually works. Unlike your stupid and immoral plan.

    6. Re:And in countries where it's legal? by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not that drug laws will prevent any of that.

      breaking into people's homes so they can steal to feed their habit

      Theft is already illegal. Punish the ones that do steal and not the ones that don't. Anything else is very similar to collective/preemptive punishment.

      If you're found transporting drugs, like in Singapore, that's the death sentence

      Yes, I definitely want the government to have the power to execute people merely for transporting drugs that people willingly consume. No innocent person could ever be executed, the government would never abuse this, and executing people for transporting something is worthwhile.

      None of this 5 years where my tax dollars are used to give them food and shelter.

      So sorry that your tax dollars are being used for prisoners. Better that we kill everyone who ends up in prison! Anything to save a buck.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    7. Re:And in countries where it's legal? by Urza9814 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      All the while destroying other people's lives while they're high, breaking into people's homes so they can steal to feed their habit, and a whole host of other issues, including medical as their bodies get ravaged but which I have to pay for (thanks Roberts).

      Nicotine is the most addictive drug known to man. But you don't generally see people breaking into homes for money to buy a pack of smokes. Why? Because it's legal, so it's cheaper and more available. You don't generally see people worrying about paying for other peoples' lung cancer either. Why? Well, partly because the people who bitch about these things tend to be smokers themselves, power of the industry lobby, etc....but there's also a big part that is IT'S LEGAL. If it's legal, you aren't going to get fired for being addicted, you aren't going to avoid seeking help for your addiction due to fear of criminal prosecution, so you're more likely to have a job and be able to take care of your own medical needs.

      The problems that you cite as reasons why drugs must remain illegal are not problems caused by drugs, but problems caused by _drug prohibition_.

    8. Re:And in countries where it's legal? by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Informative

      DUI laws stop people from drinking and driving. It used to be pretty common until it became a serious offense with serious punishments.

      Making drugs illegal does not prevent their use. Nothing will do that, even in nations with a death penalty for drug crimes drugs are still sold.

    9. Re:And in countries where it's legal? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Insightful

      and allow them to kill themselves if they wish to. All the while destroying other people's lives while they're high, breaking into people's homes so they can steal to feed their habit, and a whole host of other issues, including medical as their bodies get ravaged but which I have to pay for (thanks Roberts).

      Right, because A) all drug users are violent criminals who steal for a living, and B) forcing otherwise law abiding citizens to deal with career criminals in order to enjoy a mind-altering substance the government has decided, in a fair and just manner of course, ist verboten, is totally the right way to deal with it.

      That, or you're spouting hyperbole based on your limited understanding of the topic.

      I'll get modded down but don't care. What we need is to be more brutal. If you're found transporting drugs, like in Singapore, that's the death sentence. None of this 5 years where my tax dollars are used to give them food and shelter. Whack 'em.

      Aah, how quintessentially un-American. You deserve to be modded into oblivion.

      "These other people engage in an activity I know nothing about other than the fact that it's a minor inconvenience to me, and so they should be executed by the State!"

      Kinda makes a person wonder what subjectively unacceptable activity you're into... Especially considering that, statistically, users of the legal drugs alcohol and tobacco kill exponentially more "innocent" people, than users of all other drugs combined.

      You get rid of enough mules and the supply dries up.

      Where there is demand, there will always, ALWAYS be supply. To claim otherwise is to expound an utter lack of understanding in regard to the topic of economics.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    10. Re:And in countries where it's legal? by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When has criminalizing something actually stopped it from happening?

      It doesn't. Drug laws have never stopped any of these things.

      Attitudes like this remind me of the TSA. "Anyone could be a terrorist. The solution is clearly to infringe upon everyone's rights by molesting them at airports!" That drug user might commit a crime while on drugs. Futilely attempt to ban all drugs for everyone while wasting countless amounts of taxpayer dollars in the process!

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    11. Re:And in countries where it's legal? by DarkOx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      breaking into people's homes so they can steal to feed their habit

      They do that because drugs are artificially expensive due to the legal BS around them.

      If the risk of jail was removed the cost of manufacturing, transporting, and distributing things like Cocaine would fall thru the floor. Only the most hopelessly strung out junkie would be unable to support their habit, if by no other means than panhandling.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    12. Re:And in countries where it's legal? by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What we need is to be more brutal.

      We've tried that. We've spent billions attempting to stop drug dealers and traffickers. We've changed the laws to allow cops to break into suspected dealer's homes without knocking at 3 AM (occasionally killing innocent people who think they're being attacked by criminals and start fighting back). We've tried 3-strikes provisions so that repeat offenders are in jail forever. We've tried going to the countries where this stuff is grown and shooting people. We've tried all sorts of attempts at brutality, and none of it has led to the slightest drop in drug use or the potency of available drugs.

      It's done nothing to reduce drug abuse.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    13. Re:And in countries where it's legal? by Fast+Thick+Pants · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Futilely attempt to ban all drugs for everyone while wasting countless amounts of taxpayer dollars in the process!

      Oh, those dollars aren't being wasted... they're being very meticulously transferred by the dumpsterfull into the private prison and homeland security industries.

    14. Re:And in countries where it's legal? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Funny

      You mean like Alchohol?

      I see you are typing under influence.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    15. Re:And in countries where it's legal? by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'll get modded down but don't care. What we need is to be more brutal.

      Have you ever heard of the concept of proportional justice? People like you are more dangerous than the drug users you seek to destroy.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    16. Re:And in countries where it's legal? by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Interesting

      When I was in Thailand in 1974 there were only four drugs you couldn't buy in a pharmacy, and they were marijuana, cocaine, LSD and heroin. LSD and cocaine were completely unavailable, the place was awash with heroin and pot, and you needed no prescription for any other drug. Ecstasy might not have been invented then, but they had some amphetamines that one pill would keep you awake for two days straight. There was a salve available that was used for terminating pregnancies if the woman rubbed it on their belly button, or induce an out of body experience if you rubbed it on your temples. Quaaludes were available in pharmacies without a prescription as well.

      Oddly, although the country was awash with heroin, the only heroin addicts I ran across were all GIs.

    17. Re:And in countries where it's legal? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

      Pipe down Clippy!

    18. Re:And in countries where it's legal? by TheCarp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Do you really believe that? it's driven up costs, and as someone that believes in economics it
      > has therefore lowered abuse.

      How fucking scientific. Maybe I believe in pink unicorns.

      You are wrong, not because economics is wrong, but because you are applying it in a simplistic manner, looking at only one part of a much larger issue. Its not just a matter of cost or cost going up. These are not apples to apples comparisons by any stretch of the imagination.

      Whats gone up? well cost yes, but so has potency and purity. Do you ever hear of opium smokers doing anything?

      Partially its because you can't get opium. You can certainly get heroin. And the price of heroin has gone up, but, its far more potent, its in a pure form (not counting any cut) and often injected. Its very strong, much stronger than the smoked opium that has been all but removed from the market.

      Crystal meth. Similar. All other, safer, less potent stimulents are relegated to obscurity, shut out of the market. What remains is very potent and pure...and I don't mean pure in the "FDA regulations make sure everything on the label is actually whats in there" pure... I mean "Holy crap that stuff is over 90% methamphetamine, you better be careful".

      Not to mention.... Ive known a few users of a few drugs.... most people don't just "do anything". I know more than a few people who only ever smoked pot a handful of times because they didn't like how it made them feel or otherwise didn't enjoy it (which is how I have come to feel about alcohol actually... I don't refuse to drink as a rule, but its been a while since I even accepted a beer offered)

      A rather common model, amongst those who look at these issues, is the "Self medication" model, which looks at a large amount of drug use as little more than habbits that self medicate for other conditions (normally with the assumption that this is a bad thing, I tend to question whether its not often more effective than most think, I know people who have eliminated prescription drugs with some nasty side effects in favor of a little pot before bed.... and several others with other conditions).

      I think part of the issue here is that you are forgetting that peoples behavior isn't dictated by what you think is rational for them. You are not taking their real motivations into account. You are just assuming that changing one motivating factor must have the effect that you would predict, without actually looking deeper at whats really happening.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    19. Re:And in countries where it's legal? by xaxa · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm too young to know whether the punishment and fines changed, but in the 1980s and 1990s the British government successfully reduced the rate of drink driving by making it socially unacceptable. They ran horrific ads:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5ma_Xv7rGM
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eyzTFdCEXWk

      These are more recent:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsY_Co-p8Bw
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtJqw--DGl8

      The stats: http://www.drinkdriving.org/drink_driving_statistics_uk.php

      And the penalties; in case you want to compare: http://www.drinkdrivingfacts.com/drinkdriving/drink_driving_facts.aspx

    20. Re:And in countries where it's legal? by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There was once this fantastic little tea shop in a small village in Switzerland, did amazing business

      They specialized in Green Teas, had varieties from all over the world, extremely good quality and extremely expensive.

      You bought your tea and they gave you the choice of giving your address with a perculiar little tick box.

      You don't tick the box or don't give your address and you get a lovely little bag with nicely packed green tea.

      You do and a few hours later a courier delivers an Amazon package to your door (still don't know where they sourced THAT) containing a specific quantity of something else that was green.

      Great little business, too bad it's gone now... Owner apparently retired a very wealthy man.

    21. Re:And in countries where it's legal? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No drug, not even alcohol, can bring out of a person something that was not already in that person. A lot of people have unresolved emotional baggage, insecurities, and unhealthy tendencies that they barely keep in check, mostly through fear of consequence. This is not real character or real strength and the dissolution of inhibition can cause it to break down.

      Please stop spouting armchair psychology.

      The relationship between drugs and psychosis is complex and not completely understood... but your point-of-view is hopelessly outdated. Drug-related psychosis has little to do with the "dissolution of inhibition".

      People who have real character don't become "a different person" when drunk or high.

      "No true Scotsman..."

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    22. Re:And in countries where it's legal? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Informative

      Most addictive naturally-occuring drug, of all drugs it's #3 IIRC behind a couple of anti-psychotics.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    23. Re:And in countries where it's legal? by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's pretty easy to find plenty of evidence that h4rr4r's post is spot on. Google "Portugal decriminalization".

      https://www.google.com/search?q=portugal+decriminalization

      h4rr4r speaks truth, whether or not you want to hear it.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    24. Re:And in countries where it's legal? by Hatta · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ecstasy might not have been invented then

      MDMA was actually invented by Merck in 1912, but didn't find its way into recreational use until the 80s.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    25. Re:And in countries where it's legal? by Fast+Thick+Pants · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The penal system is not suitable turf for free-market competition. The market forces push in the direction of maximizing the numbers of incarcerated through lobbying for "tougher" laws with mandatory minimum sentences, and prison conditions that maximize recidivism. Pushing back in the other direction are compassion, basic human decency, and the 8th amendment -- all of which will cut into profits, so anyone who runs a prison decently will be underbid by the more ruthless. And when they cut corners and people suffer and die, heck, that's prison life, don't do the crime if you can't do the time.

  2. Nice Ad Placement or DEA Honeypot by Lashat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You decide.

    --
    For every benefit you receive a tax is levied. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
    1. Re:Nice Ad Placement or DEA Honeypot by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Informative

      How exactly would your theoretical honeypot work? Only buyers need to provide anything remotely identifiable (e.g., shipping address). Do you think the DEA cares about going after kids who buy $100 worth of LSD?

      Considering that arresting end users is pretty much the DEA's bread-and-butter, I'd say yes, yes they do.

      From above link:

      (2010 - crime - drug manufacturing arrests) Of the 1,638,846 arrests for drug law violations in 2010, 81.9% (1,342,215) were for possession of a controlled substance. Only 18.1% (296,631) were for the sale or manufacture of a drug.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  3. Re:For now. by Urza9814 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps. But why? The war on drugs is largely about publicity and money. Making big, quick busts to show off on the evening news, and confiscating cash to use to buy police equipment (in some southern US states, there are MASSIVE police departments with practically ZERO public funding -- they fund themselves with confiscated drug cash.) You can't really confiscate bitcoin easily, and going after the buyers is going to be a lot of police effort for very little PR win and no real cash win (particularly since the buyers are located all over the globe)

    Compared to the ease of snapping up kids selling drugs on the street corner, I don't think it's worth their time to go after this kind of traffic. At least not yet.

  4. Most drug dealer are trustworthy by aepervius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Drug war between opposite drug clan are relatively rare , and when they do happen they usually only impact seller, not buyer. This is a business you can only advertise by "mouth to ear" so most seller understand that if they screw up, their business will drop. That's why you get so many positive rating. In fact, you get a more likely good relation ship with your dealer to which you are a known face and source of money, than for an anonymous corporation for which you are a blimp in a statistic.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  5. Good! by sjames · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Every transaction there avoids a transaction on the street that potentially includes gun violence and harm to bystanders.

  6. Re:Why is the feedback system surprising? by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Informative

    I am betting you have never been part of a typical drug deal.

    Think less what you see on TV and in movies and more mundane real life. People are doing this to make money, killing the buyers does not help with that.

  7. Re:For now. by SpeedBump0619 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So in theory I could acquire a good number of anonymous bitcoin and have my shiny new drugs drop shipped to an ex, or maybe some poor politician I disagree with. Or, I could just ship it directly to me and claim I was being targeted. Just, you know, *theoretically*.

  8. Drugs are illegal because... by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1) Illegal drugs fund the CIA (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_and_Contras_cocaine_trafficking_in_the_US). No possibility of corruption there, of course.
    2) Illegal drugs finance the banks (http://www.dailyfinance.com/2010/06/29/us-banks-laundered-mexican-drug-money/), even helps them weather financial crises (http://www.guardian.co.uk/global/2009/dec/13/drug-money-banks-saved-un-cfief-claims).
    3) Last, but not at ALL least, illegal drug money finances congressional campaigns (http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/10/18/gordon-duff-how-drug-money-is-buying-our-new-congress/).

    Illegal drugs! They feel good, taste good and they're so good for you! ...if you happen to be part of the world's money/power elite. This is why they'll never go away, and they'll never be legal.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  9. Re:98% by smellsofbikes · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Drug dealers are the resistance in The War on Drugs.

    Actually, drug dealers are the ones hoping that the war on drugs continues, or they'll be out of work.

    This is seriously on-topic. I know a pot dealer/grower who is spending a good chunk of his income fighting against continued/expanded legalization and medical marijuana initiatives because the ones already in place in this state are financially crippling him. Suddenly he's no longer the long-haired hippie: he has a suit, short hair, and shows up at every local public meeting on zoning to argue that allowing marijuana dispensaries is immoral and a danger to our children. It's sort of funny to watch, although I'm also fairly pissed at him because I am personally in favor of medical marijuana being easily available.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  10. Re:Actually, no. by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The main question here is whether or not crime rates are lower in these countries, and they are not, to my knowledge. The Netherlands with its much laxer narcotics regime however is taking in prisoners from other countries because they haven't enough to fill their own.