Slashdot Mirror


Use Google's Nexus 7 Tablet As a VoIP Phone, For Free

Lauren Weinstein writes with a link to this short-and-sweet explanation: "I don't usually do 'how-to' postings, and I'll have much more comprehensive discussions of Android 'Jelly Bean' and the Google Nexus 7 tablet later — there are some really fascinating implications to how that ecosystem is developing. But since quite a few people have been asking me if it's possible to use the Wi-Fi-based Nexus 7 as a phone, I thought I'd scribble out this quickie guide. In short, yes, even though the N7 doesn't obviously have phone-related user interfaces, you can use the N7 as a phone for both outgoing and incoming calls via VoIP, and this can be accomplished completely for free via Google Voice accounts."

15 of 91 comments (clear)

  1. Really?!! Shocking!! by HycoWhit · · Score: 5, Funny

    So you meant to tell me a device with a microphone, speaker, and wi-fi connection can be used to make VOIP calls!! Wow--what will folks figure out next? When you guys get around to discovering stuff like Skype, Google Voice, etc--let me keep sleeping...

    1. Re:Really?!! Shocking!! by SQLGuru · · Score: 2

      Yeah.....this post seemed like a lot of "duh" to anyone who's heard of any of these products.

    2. Re:Really?!! Shocking!! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So you meant to tell me a device with a microphone, speaker, and wi-fi connection can be used to make VOIP calls!! Wow--what will folks figure out next? When you guys get around to discovering stuff like Skype, Google Voice, etc--let me keep sleeping...

      Unfortunately, the 'news' in this story is more along the lines of "Wow, consumer electronics device with microphne, speaker, and wi-fi connection not cryptographically crippled so hard that you can't do obviously useful things with it!"...

      In our delightsome world of carrier locked handsets, mandatory app stores, and rampant consoleitis, the fact that a device shows signs of matching its technical capabilities, not its profit maximizing capabilities, is beginning to count as news...

    3. Re:Really?!! Shocking!! by KingSkippus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You must have missed the "for free" part. Skype charges for calls to POTS lines, and Google Voice doesn't allow you to make outgoing calls directly from the tablet, though it will allow you to call a phone where you are and then dial from that phone out to your contacts.

      You can argue that this might not be earth-shattering news, but it's not like what the article is about is something that is as intuitively obvious as you're trying to make it out to be.

    4. Re:Really?!! Shocking!! by Shompol · · Score: 2
      "hearing of products" and finding a practical solution that works is not one and the same. For example, I would love to use Nexus 7 as a phone, but it is probably not practical at this point because I frequently have voice-only connection where I travel. Let me demonstrate why your argument does not work:

      A man landed on moon today. He got there by strapping a rocket booster engine to his lawn chair.

      Yeah.....this post seemed like a lot of "duh" to anyone who's heard of any of these products.

    5. Re:Really?!! Shocking!! by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2

      There are many apps that do exactly what the article says. I used one on my iPod touch years ago. I also have a device attached to my home phone line that also uses Google voice for calls.

      This may be news for some, but not news for the vast majority of readers of this site.

  2. Mr. Obvious says obvious things. by Picass0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    On one hand Slashdot runs stories where they throw out obscure acronyms I need to google, and then the flip side of the coin are stories that MIGHT surprise your grandmother. Well done, editors!

     

  3. Nothing new... by mackil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is hardly earth shattering news. A friend of mine uses his iPod Touch as a phone and has for over a year. Wi-fi when it's available, and a 4G hot spot when it's not. Works great and is a great deal cheaper for those who aren't heavy users.

    1. Re:Nothing new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Huh? Do telcos charge fat people more or something?

  4. The idea is to provide specific instructions by Lauren+Weinstein · · Score: 4, Informative

    No representation was made that this was earth-shattering news. Rather, a *lot* of people had been asking specifically how to make this work (not everyone is as knowledgeable about this area as some folks seem to think!) and the goal was to provide an approach with specific instructions that would function for people already using Google Voice, or who can obtain Google Voice accounts. This approach also has the advantage of going direct to Google Voice servers, rather than via third parties, which is also a plus (as far as I'm concerned, anyway).

    1. Re:The idea is to provide specific instructions by Zemran · · Score: 2

      No one is criticizing the writing of the article but we question what it is doing here on /. The article belongs in the blogoshere with all the howto use Google Voice or Skype or whatever.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    2. Re:The idea is to provide specific instructions by Lauren+Weinstein · · Score: 2

      I think you may be somewhat overestimating the ability of many users to set up these environments in various cases without specific instructions. I know that when I mentioned that I was happy with this solution (in another venue) I got flooded with people asking for step-by-step instructions. In any case, all I did was note the posting, and I assume that the Slashdot editors have a pretty good sense of what will be useful/interesting to their readership overall, which seems to include a significant number of non-techies these days.

    3. Re:The idea is to provide specific instructions by Desler · · Score: 2

      and I assume that the Slashdot editors have a pretty good sense of what will be useful/interesting to their readership overall

      You're joking, right? These are the same idiots who came up with turds such as Idle, Slash BI and Slashdot TV that have been almost universally hated. They haven't had a good idea in ages. Let alone the fact that they are too stupid to even properly spell check and fact check the submissions. You give them far too much credit.

  5. negativity by lytles · · Score: 2

    wow - lots of negativity in the comments so far. yes, on one level this is obvious, but in reality i've found this difficult

    i use google voice as my primary number and most days i don't buy prepaid service (i'm spending $100 per year for the last 2 years) - so i'm wifi only. when i'm on a linux box (with a hardwired ethernet) i use the gmail to make calls. but i haven't found a great solution for my phone - google nexus s. what i'm doing is have google voice forward the call to ipkall (free pots to sip gateway) and then answer the call on my phone with csipsimple (seemed better than builtin, though i haven't tried the builtin sip since i upgraded to ICS). for testing, i do the same thing on my linux box using sflphone. the quality using gmail is much better than what i've gotten from either csipsimple or sflphone (i'm on a 1Mbit dsl connection)

    so an android app that talks directly to GV seems incredibly useful to me. anyone know how this works - eg, are they just running a pots-to-sip gateway or have they actually implemented the GV protocol (i think it's jingle with some extensions). any other apps that are doing something similar, especially one that's Free ? or linux programs (on my laptop, leaving gmail open eats my battery) ? anybody else using GV + wifi as their primary means of communication ? how does the voice quality compare with gmail ?

    yes, the article isn't great. but the idea is 100% geek - embrace it. in the meantime i'm going to go investigate GIPL and see if anyone else is implementing the GV protocol

  6. Security concerns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Am I the only one or do others look at this technology and think it's really neat and something I'd like to have, but as soon as I have to type in my google email address and password, I get leery that this 3rd party, closed source "lite" application is secretly doing an HTTP POST to a remote web server in some scary dude's basement and he's then using my google mail account for his own personal interests???