Slashdot Mirror


Mastercard Denies Plans For BitCoin Credit Card

judgecorp writes "Reports that BitCoin is to issue a credit card have turned out to be false — or at least premature. Mastercard has denied there are any such plans and given details of the procedural barriers to creating such a card."

98 of 167 comments (clear)

  1. other? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How did "a major international bank" turn into "only MasterCard?" Surely there are other international banks -- or have I missed recent news?

    1. Re:other? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      How did "a major international bank" turn into "only MasterCard?" Surely there are other international banks -- or have I missed recent news?

      I don't really understand what you're asking, but MasterCard isn't an international bank, or any other sort of bank. Where did you get that from?

    2. Re:other? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's funny that you actually think bitcoin people actually even know anything about this topic. 99% of them are clueless Internet tards who parrot the "fiat currency is teh bad!!!" slogans they hear from other Internet tards.

      fiat currency, eh? Well, if Italian auto makers do have their own currency, then yes, I expect it is quite bad.

    3. Re:other? by Desler · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because I realize that bitcoin is a giant scam? Because I know that Mastercard is not a bank?

    4. Re:other? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How is it scam?

      I have first hand experience buying and paying with bitcoins. I got what i paid for, and no, those were not drugs.

    5. Re:other? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I got what i paid for, and no, those were not drugs.

      So child pornography, then?

    6. Re:other? by idontgno · · Score: 2

      You would have had to read TFA in the original story, but all indications were explicit that it would be a Mastercard debit card.

      Besides, "a major international bank" is not mutually exclusive of "Mastercard." Banks issue Mastercards. Both are needed. (It's not a debit card unless it's backed by a bank, and it's not a Mastercard if Mastercard doesn't say it's a Mastercard.)

      So Mastercard saying "hell no" is actually a little bit of a roadblock.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    7. Re:other? by harks · · Score: 2

      Stock offers from legitimate successful companies also benefit creators and early adopters. By your definition, does that make all stock offers scams?

    8. Re:other? by gatfirls · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Not by that definition, but yes most stock offers have "scammy" elements. Anyway, a stock is a bad example to make your point a stock is basically ownership of something. A bitcoin represents confidence and nothing else, without the confidence it is worth absolutely zero. Before you bring up other currencies, yes they are confidence based to but they are backed by their countries might and economy.

    9. Re:other? by SandorZoo · · Score: 2

      You're correct that the original story said these were debit cards, not credit cards.

      I don't see how this necessarily requires Mastercard's approval. Presumably "a major international bank" (MIB) can already issue Mastercards, and guarantees them. Do Mastercard themselves approve every type of Mastercard that MIB issues?

      MIB could come to a private arrangement with BitInstant, that goes like this: BitInstant maintains your balance. You use your BitInstant/Mastercard/MIB debit card. MIB credits the vendor and debits BitInstant. BitInstant debits your account, converts it to "real" money (that's what they do) and credits MIB.

      If Mastercard is already happy with MIB issuing Mastercards, and MIB is happy with its arrangement with BitInstant, then what's to stop this going ahead? The danger to the end user is that BitInstant goes south and loses your money, but that's not Mastercard's or MIB's problem, except MIB would be liable (I expect) for the payments it had accepted (and guaranteed), but not yet been credited for by BitInstant. As far as Mastercard are concerned, it would be MIB that backs any and all the guarantees that you get with a Mastercard.

    10. Re:other? by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Wow, after your insightful comment I see the light! Bitcoins are a scam! I must unload my 5 bitcoins. How about $5 each? Will you take them?

    11. Re:other? by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Good points.

      Theoretically, there is a separation of interests (and risks) between the issuing bank and the clearing/processing company (i.e., Mastercard, in this case). However, processors have already shown themselves vulnerable to pressure to not process certain types of transactions. And, in that particular case (Visa blockade of Wikileaks donations), I notice that Bitcoin is explicitly cited as an existing end-run of this kind of financial embargo, so it's already in the awareness of the processors, and not in a good way.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    12. Re:other? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The other currencies are backed by nothing, just like bitcoins are ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    13. Re:other? by dirtaddshp · · Score: 1

      Actually they are worth $10 per BTC. They were $13 a week ago.

    14. Re:other? by Stickerboy · · Score: 1

      The other currencies are backed by nothing, just like bitcoins are ...

      The other currencies are backed up by weight of law, which is backed up by the weight of regulations and enforcement of entire communities. Bitcoins are backed up by a collective delusion of short-term investors looking for a profit. I wonder which will be around in 10 years...

      --
      Light a fire for a man and he'll be warm for a day. Light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
    15. Re:other? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'd trust bitcoin over the US dollar. I might not be able to pay my taxes in bitcoin and the price might fluctuate although I know there will be demand for it for one reason and one reason alone. There is an underground economy that depends on it. Cash is still dominate for a reason on electronic currencies. We have had electronic currency for ages. It's call credit/debit cards. The reason cash is still king in the real world is because the larger economy is still heavily dependent on the underground economy. It's not so much a privacy issue as people have shown a willingness to throw away privacy for convenience and security. What they haven't shown is a willingness to get taxed. To avoid taxes you use cash. Thus bitcoin has value and it isn't all about drugs, porn, and the sex trade. There are other reasons to sell stuff using bitcoins. The next eBay is going to use bitcoins and the sellers won't report the income. eBay/paypal on the other hand report income now. You ultimately MUST pay taxes as a result.

    16. Re:other? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2, Informative

      The other currencies are backed up by weight of law ...

      You are mistaken. There is no law that gives the US dollar any value, nor is there one for Euros.

      A few currencies are backed by binding them to another currency, but usually that is a fiat currency again. (Like the fixed exchange rate of the chineese currency towards the dollar)

      The word fiat in the currencies we use in our days exactly means: unbacked.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  2. Not too mention by kaizendojo · · Score: 1

    ...the almost complete lack of interest or trust expressed in just about every online forum or news outlet we leaked this to.

  3. shocker by slashmydots · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A worldwide, multi-billion dollar company doesn't want to help promote a new competitor that undercuts their price and their control over the global flow of money? I never saw that one coming!
    Oh and also, bitcoin is 100% digital so any internet-capable device can send bitcoins anywhere in the world in under 10 minutes "to clear" time. So a plastic card would just help regulate it and add another layer of complication and control by an outside force. Not 1 single bitcoin user would have gone for such a product. This story had fake written all over it from the beginning.

    1. Re:shocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think you are completely missing the reason for having a bitcoin credit card in the first place. It would have been accepted anywhere a normal mastercard would (according to tfa). This would've meant bitcoin could be used to buy stuff pretty much anywhere in real-life instead of some small online black markets or bitcoin exchanges.

    2. Re:shocker by larko · · Score: 2

      1 BTC = 9.93 USD

    3. Re:shocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Mastercard is a payment processor, they really and truly don't care what the currency they're processing bills are denominated with. The reason why they're not likely to ever accept bitcoin is that they would have to guarantee it and at present bitcoins are just a fancy ponzi scheme.

    4. Re:shocker by shentino · · Score: 1

      In other words, unwanted competition for the credit card companies.

      No wonder mastercard didn't approve of it.

    5. Re:shocker by Desler · · Score: 1

      How does Mastercard have control over the global flow of money? It's saying stupid things like this for why people mock bitcoin and its supporters.

    6. Re:shocker by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      More like they have no interest in a ponzi scheme started by an anomomous coward, which has seen its value drop like a rock on severa occasions already.

    7. Re:shocker by Kjella · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh and also, bitcoin is 100% digital so any internet-capable device can send bitcoins anywhere in the world in under 10 minutes "to clear" time.

      Which is one of many reasons the last story smelled bad, who'd wait 10 minutes for their grocery payment to clear. The alternative would be that MasterCard or somebody guarantees the merchant gets paid before you disappear out the door with the goods, never to be seen again while your transaction bounces 10 minutes later. At the very best it would be something like having a credit card in a foreign currency where they take an exchange fee for converting your Bitcoins to US Dollars or whatever the local currency is, since I guess nobody would take Bitcoins.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    8. Re:shocker by Desler · · Score: 3, Informative

      Competition to what exactly? Assuming it would have taken off Mastercard would have been raking in money off the conversion fees on each transaction.

    9. Re:shocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They didn't say they don't approve it. They said they were never asked about it.

      Seriously, Bitcoin people say "we'll have a global Mastercard-branded credit card avaolable to you all very soon". Mastercard say "Whadafuk? Who are you and how can you offer a Mastercard-branded card very soon if we've never heard of you?!". This only shows the lack of professionalism by Bitcoin.

    10. Re:shocker by slashmydots · · Score: 2

      And yet I made a bunch of money mining bitcoins with a high powered dual GPU system. Wow, I sure got taken! Like 99% of other bitcoin enthusiasts, I read every last detail about how the system works, potential problems, and thoroughly protected my wallet file on cold storage (not attached to my PC). And oh look, I made money. Stupid, careless people get their money stolen whether it's BTC or USD. Don't use sketchy exchanges. Don't leave your wallet file live and then download 50 illegal software packages with viruses. Don't use the same password on a forum as the exchange. This is security basics, people, it's not a problem with bitcoins. By the way, I've never heard of a Ponzi scheme that doesn't have any central authority running it. That's a new one, lol.

    11. Re:shocker by Bam_Thwok · · Score: 2

      "Didn't approve of it" is not the same as "Never heard of it".

    12. Re:shocker by Bam_Thwok · · Score: 2

      That, and I'm sure their legal team would have a seizure trying to figure out their potential liability from helping to launder monopoly drug money back into the economy.

    13. Re:shocker by Bigby · · Score: 1

      People generating fear or misinterpreting what Mastercard does. Mastercard does have substantial control over inter-currency exchange rates. But that's it.

    14. Re:shocker by Bam_Thwok · · Score: 2

      MasterCard is a payment processor that merchants and consumers CHOOSE to use for convenience, not a boa constrictor wrapped around the neck of international commerce. If WikiLeaks wanted to, they could accept donations from dollar bills stuffed in envelopes, but they wanted an online processing instead. MasterCard shut them off because they didn't want to known as one of the companies processing charitable contributions to an international espionage suspect, not because they're some megalomaniacal superpower.

    15. Re:shocker by makomk · · Score: 1

      Have you ever heard of network effects? Most companies don't accept cards other than Mastercard and Visa for payment because there's no point accepting a payment method hardly anyone has, most consumers don't have other cards because there's no point having a card that you can't actually pay anywhere with, and most banks don't offer anything else because no consumer wants them. So Mastercard and Visa effectively have a strangehold on the payments market.

    16. Re:shocker by makomk · · Score: 2

      The alternative would be that the payment provider requires you to have a Bitcoin balance loaded onto the card that's already safely under their control before you use it to pay for anything, which was I think exactly what they've said they're going to do.

    17. Re:shocker by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Mastercard didn't do for it because it's a non starter. bitcoin is shit, and it's full of issues. If not, Mastercard would use it to make money they way they do. Mastercard only care about the ability of the currency you can charge against.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    18. Re:shocker by Bam_Thwok · · Score: 1

      Except for cash, lines of credit, checks, money orders, wire transfers, et al. Just because Visa/Mastercard payment processing is more convenient than other methods doesn't put them in charge.

    19. Re:shocker by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      Why should Mastercard care what currency you're using? They'd probably love to offer bitcoin services... then they get to charge the merchant a transaction fee AND the customer a transaction fee plus currency exchange. It would be like everyone was suddenly shopping abroad.

      However, Mastercard isn't going to go for an anonymous system.

    20. Re:shocker by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Nobody (big) will take bitcoins directly because at the end of the day you've got no idea how much they're going to be worth.

    21. Re:shocker by Desler · · Score: 1

      Actually most companies accept more payment options than just Visa and Mastercard. Name me a company, not some niche store that 10 people shop at, that many people deal with on a daily basis that doesn't take either cash, checks, have their own line of credit, another payment service like Paypal or things like western union payments.

    22. Re:shocker by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      MTGox -- this one. Look up their company history.

    23. Re:shocker by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      How does the end customer being charged an extra 1% "undercut their price" exactly?

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    24. Re:shocker by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      You could accept rocks, food, bartering, Eve Online currently, magical spells (but not on ebay lol) and nintendo 64 games as payment and your company is still a joke if you don't take credit cards. There's a thrift store next to my computer repair store that attempted to not take credit cards for 2 months. He lost so many sales and had so many pissed off customers, he had to find a processor. Speaking of processors, ask any merchant services sales rep what they think of how Visa and Mastercard control everything, set all the prices, and repeatedly try to totally screw them.

    25. Re:shocker by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      Actually "the" reason is so Mastercard could skim off a couple percent from it as a currency conversion fee. I run credit cards so trust me, someone pays me in Euros and I get totally screwed. It's like 4%+.

    26. Re:shocker by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      So you made actual money, without doing any actual work in order to generate that "wealth" other than running a program on your computer for an extended amount of time. You created wealth without creating value.

      Explain how this isn't a massive fiduciary jerk-off again? Sounds a lot like the much-maligned speculators of the futures markets to me.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    27. Re:shocker by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      Which is one of many reasons the last story smelled bad, who'd wait 10 minutes for their grocery payment to clear.

      Ignoring for the moment the fact that from the merchant's point of view the last story was about a traditional debit card, not actual Bitcoin transfers, ten minutes is still quite an improvement over the current system, which generally takes months to "clear" the payment beyond the risk of a chargeback. With Bitcoin, after about 10 minutes (the time it takes, on average, to incorporate the transaction into the next block in the chain) the payment is effectively final, and within an hour or so (six confirmations) there is no credible risk of reversal whatsoever.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    28. Re:shocker by fridaynightsmoke · · Score: 1

      Have you ever heard of network effects? Most companies don't accept cards other than Mastercard and Visa for payment because there's no point accepting a payment method hardly anyone has, most consumers don't have other cards because there's no point having a card that you can't actually pay anywhere with, and most banks don't offer anything else because no consumer wants them. So Mastercard and Visa effectively have a strangehold on the payments market.

      Heh, I applied for an AmEx card last week, sounds like I shouldn't have bothered ;)

      --
      This is a substitute for a clever sig that fits within the maximum number of characters.
    29. Re:shocker by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Value is purely a matter of perception, as is reality. The perceived value is in the GPU time, the scarcity of the current Bitcoin pool and the potential size of the Bitcoin pool.

    30. Re:shocker by LF11 · · Score: 1

      How is that any different than regular government-issued currency?

      cej102937

    31. Re:shocker by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Have you noticed what happens in countries where the local currency is subject to extreme value fluctuations? In case you've never been to such a place: nobody accepts it, or they accept it only at an extremely steep discount. Foreign currency is what everyone (who can get it) uses.

      That is, it's NOT any different than regular government-issued currency.

    32. Re:shocker by generica1 · · Score: 1

      Wow, there sure are a lot of anti-Bitcoin trolls who don't understand the technology or the idea of how currency can work out on the slashdoternets today.

      --
      JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP IRRIGATE
    33. Re:shocker by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin value is attached to a currency. That means an economy. The BTC economy is worth about $100,000,000. Or about the size of a small city.

      That means it's more stable than a stock in a single company.

      BTC buyers do add value to the currency. They intend to eventually spend or exchange their BTC, that means they are adding confidence to a fledgling economy.

      What people who don't have BTC are upset about is that the price has gone up astronomically while they weren't involved and BTC is slowly (but surely) becoming the defacto Internet currency which means that it's valuation will increase by orders of magnitude.

      And yes a few days ago someone sold 40,000 BTC creating a minor panic. Immediately before that the price of a BTC increased 50% to $15... and no one sold. People are holding onto their BTC very very tightly... if you wanted to put your savings into BTC right now you'd have quite a difficult time.

      Banks, credit cards, hedge funds, etc. are against BTC. Some because the wealth has been so distributed that they can't get their normal 99% and some because it means freedom from fees and central control.

      Those opponents are perfectly happy to spend 10 or 20 thousand dollars to push the price around and make the currency seem unstable or unviable.

      The way the currency has been attacked by someone (if you wanted to sell off your coins why not just put them on sale for $10 instead of selling all at once and getting
      Don't let your BTC go for less that $10,000. Next year is going to be a lot better than this year.

    34. Re:shocker by Shompol · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin is a scam to benefit the creators and early adopters. Here's your link, you pedantic little fagget: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin#Initial_distribution

      The link you provided actually disproves what you say next to it.
      The inventors/early adapters got rewarded. This is normal for anything that becomes successful later, but nobody can predict it becoming successful in advance. Go ahead, invest in a currency or company stock that will become uber-successful 5 years from now. You cannot. The current market cap of Bitcoin is estimated to be around 100 million - did not make anyone a billionaire yet. Compare that to Disney Corp that did not produce anything of value in the past 60 years, and their market cap is in tens of billions.

      So there are risks and rewards, sounds like a normal financial instrument to me. You don't think bitcoin is worth a penny - do not invest in it. However, the market decides if it is worth something, not just you, and the market thinks it is worth 100 million at this point. Can the whole affair collapse tomorrow? Definitely, as soon as someone comes up with a better algorithm, or governments worldwide decide to crack down on Wikileaks. This is called "risk", and it happened to Enron, Mortgage backed securities, USSR -- all asset-backed securities. So this is as much a scam as anything else related to finance.

    35. Re:shocker by tftp · · Score: 1

      Heh, I applied for an AmEx card last week, sounds like I shouldn't have bothered ;)

      The pizza place near my home only takes Visa and cash. The owned explained that anything else is too expensive and isn't worth it.

    36. Re:shocker by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      How is that different from US dollars?

      I think the main difference is that with US dollars and practically any other well established mainstream currency, even if it fluctuates a bit over the course of a day or week or whatever, if you bought a loaf of bread before the fluctuation for 2.99 then that loaf of bread will probably still be 2.99 afterwards. Typical retailers don't peg their products to the perturbations of currency valuation on any kind of a short term basis. I suspect that the expectation is different with bitcoin though I haven't sought out confirmation of this in practice.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    37. Re:shocker by tftp · · Score: 1

      Value is purely a matter of perception, as is reality.

      You cannot eat that value or live in it. Even artists are creating more value (though that is also intangible) because they are producing works that people want to see or hear.

      Bitcoins, just like most any currency, have no intrinsic value. You cannot eat dollar bills and you don't really care to own those sea shells. The only value of the currency comes from the fact that you can exchange it for products that you really need. Bitcoin has minting cost, however. Dollars have no minting cost (or it is so low that we don't care.)

      This means that by wasting power and calculating numbers you created no value to the humanity. At best you moved someone else's wealth into your pocket by convincing the seller that your bits are better than someone else's pieces of green paper. Your gain has the same origin as the gain of issuing banks - they make money out of thin air, and so do you. Nobody got more food on the table because of that. You only created and sold another - and more expensive - token. In essence, that's the whole idea behind Bitcoin - to create an alternative currency and get rich off of it.

    38. Re:shocker by ultranova · · Score: 1

      So you made actual money, without doing any actual work in order to generate that "wealth" other than running a program on your computer for an extended amount of time. You created wealth without creating value.

      Actually, he did generate value: the processing power he contributed meant that the blocks involved were found sooner, which drove up the difficulty, which made it harder for an attacker to remove transactions from the Bitcoin history (to double-spend bitcoins).

      Remember, whoever controls the most computing power decides which blockchain is the correct one. Every honest mining node helps safeguard the integrity of Bitcoin against attacks. They contribute value in the same way vault door in a bank does.

      Explain how this isn't a massive fiduciary jerk-off again? Sounds a lot like the much-maligned speculators of the futures markets to me.

      Well, except that there's no futures involved in Bitcoin mining. Nor speculation. Nor market.

      However, I find it quite interesting that every Bitcoin story draws hordes of people who apparently hate the very idea of a decentralized currency. Why?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    39. Re:shocker by LF11 · · Score: 1

      I have been in countries where the local currency is in the middle of being re-valued. I was unable to exchange local currency for any other, even immediately on the other side of the border. It is tough, for people trapped in that.

      On the other hand, you cannot tell me that the actual cost of gasoline fluctuates whole percentage points based on old men in the Federal Reserve making reports on their money-related activities. No, that is the value of the U.S. dollar fluctuating, while the cost of gasoline remains steady. Price of gas drop because the stock market dropped? That's because the base currency gained in value, not because any actual factor relating to gasoline extraction/production/transportation changed.

      The price of gasoline cost $0.25 SILVER per gallon a century ago, and it still costs $0.25 SILVER per gallon today. The rise in apparent price is due entirely to local currency fluctuations.

      Because BitCoins are not directly tied to any single currency, and are not manipulated by fiat, and are instead a representative of time and number of users, BitCoins will likely become a far more stable monetary unit than government-issued currencies. When you see the exchange rate graph of BitCoins begin to mirror the price of oil, that day will have come.

      If you look at the 1M graphs of BitCoins and oil, that mirroring has already begun.

    40. Re:shocker by ultranova · · Score: 1

      More like they have no interest in a ponzi scheme started by an anomomous coward, which has seen its value drop like a rock on severa occasions already.

      If you don't like something and it's related to money, it's a ponzi scheme. If it's related to politics, it's fascism. If it's related to both, it's communism.

      And it's not like Satoshi Nakamoto is any more or less anonymous than you, LurkerXXX, unless your parents had a weird sense of humour.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    41. Re:shocker by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Yes, regular currencies fluctuate. But they aren't anything like as volatile as Bitcoin. IF Bitcoin catches on and IF it's infrastructure ends up being stable enough to support a major currency, THEN bitcoin may become a commonly used currency. Currently that is not the case.

    42. Re:shocker by LF11 · · Score: 1

      True, and that will continue to be the case until it takes over the world. :)

      The same way Linux has taken over the personal computing world, via Android, a software stack that only a handful of people even knew existed barely 5 years ago. :)

    43. Re:shocker by sarkeizen · · Score: 1

      Oh and also, bitcoin is 100% digital so any internet-capable device can send bitcoins anywhere in the world in under 10 minutes "to clear" time. So a plastic card would just help regulate it and add another layer of complication and control by an outside force.

      ...and make it a useful system for POS. 10 min transaction clearing might be barely tolerable for internet transactions but I'm not interested in waiting for 10 min for my groceries payment to clear. Also 10 min is not necessarily the maximal amount of time as the block chain grows the length of time to get confirmation increases. You can do it in less time by forgoing confirmation but then you lose one of it's primary benefits.

    44. Re:shocker by mark_elf · · Score: 1

      The price of gasoline cost $0.25 SILVER per gallon a century ago, and it still costs $0.25 SILVER per gallon today. The rise in apparent price is due entirely to local currency fluctuations.

      Silver and gasoline are industrial commodities that are both manufactured: both have to be taken from the ground and refined. Both have storage and distribution infrastructures. Not only have all these systems radically changed over the last 100 years, the relative scarcity and demand for silver and gasoline have not remained constant. Your point seems to be that the inherent value of commodities never, ever change with respect to each other, even over a hundred years. That doesn't seem to be true. Just choosing a commodity to be a currency would change it's value a lot.

      Because BitCoins are not directly tied to any single currency, and are not manipulated by fiat, and are instead a representative of time and number of users, BitCoins will likely become a far more stable monetary unit than government-issued currencies. When you see the exchange rate graph of BitCoins begin to mirror the price of oil, that day will have come. If you look at the 1M graphs of BitCoins and oil, that mirroring has already begun.

      My God, why would you want your currency tied to the inherent value of oil? I hope for your sake that's not true. One exocet later...

      Dollars at least have the advantage of being the fiat currency of the most wealthy and powerful national economy on earth, if only being backed by it's national debt. Bitcoins are the fiat currency of some internet geeks and drug addicts, and are only backed by the strength of... the bitcoin market. As long as everyone has "faith in bitcoins", you're good.

    45. Re:shocker by tgmarks · · Score: 1

      Not 1 single bitcoin user would have gone for such a product. This story had fake written all over it from the beginning.

      This is dead wrong!!! Many Bitcoin users would be all over this as Bitcoin is not accepted at many places and this would be a very simple way of transferring the money and spending it.

    46. Re:shocker by LF11 · · Score: 1

      Well, because everything we do is currently tied to the inherent value of oil? All food production, all transportation, all manufacturing, all mining and extraction of any kind, all of it is a function of oil. Everything. As the cost of oil goes up, so too must the price of everything else go up, unless you happen to live in a self-supporting situation. Any realistic currency will mirror the price of oil, because everything else mirrors the price of oil! Oil is the true expression of value in our civilization, because that is what the entire civilization is built on.

      As to your point about dollars; I have very little faith in the "most wealthy and powerful national economy on earth." It is being looted and emptied of its wealth and power, and will collapse. The "handwriting is on the wall," so to speak. All fiat currencies are backed by nothing more than faith. That "national debt" you speak of is a promise to repay; a promise backed by faith. If that faith is broken, as it surely will be, the currency will immediately collapse. It is not within the realm of most people's imagination to comprehend how quickly that can happen, since most of us have never experienced it.

      Such is not the case with BitCoin. To the contrary, every indication is that BitCoin will continue being used for shadow economy activities, thereby gaining silent penetration throughout the world. BitCoin's strength is in the number of people using it, and right now, that strength is growing by the day. That is an important distinction: "MONEY" is backed by "FAITH IN GOVERNMENT", while "BITCOIN" is backed by "NUMBER OF PEOPLE USING IT." One changes with the stroke of a pen, the other changes as people change. Neither is 100 percent safe.

      Which do you feel is more worthy of your trust? Your peers, or your government?

      cej102937

    47. Re:shocker by Bam_Thwok · · Score: 1

      With USD you have exquisite knowledge of the sender and recipient of funds and can physically trace the movement of bills with markings or serial numbers. They can choose not to participate in legally dubious activities. Almost the entirety of the sales pitch of BitCoin is that it's anonymous and untraceable. If MasterCard can't tell the difference between a payment processed to pay for a can of soda and a payment processed to pay for 10 kilos of cocaine, they may be inadvertently abetting or committing a crime totally outside of their control. I guess you're too stupid to realize I never said that BitCoin didn't have legitimate uses, but that a payment processor of anonymous transactions can't tell the difference between legal and illegal ones.

    48. Re:shocker by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Having your inputs and your outputs denominated in different currencies is always somewhat risky but while major world currencies do move relative to each other they do not generally do so at anything like the rate bitcoin does. So the risk is much lower.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    49. Re:shocker by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      1 BTC = 9.93 USD

      And here I was thinking it'd be something like $6.66 USD (or any currency) to 1 BTC.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
  4. Only room... by o_ferguson · · Score: 1

    ...for one racket in this town, son...

    --
    - In Soviet Korea, only old people loose all their bases to Natalie Portman's petrified hot grits overlords.
  5. AC called it by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

    http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3062943&cid=41068717

    So it was just a photoshop job, eh? I'm not surprised...

    --
    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    1. Re:AC called it by gatfirls · · Score: 2

      They really need to ban bitcoin "stories" (ads) on here unless they are going to get paid for them. It's nothing more than people trying to inflate that bubble again so they can cash out. It's pitiful. May as well have stories about rumors of people becoming so damn rich from johnny woos secrets.

    2. Re:AC called it by gatfirls · · Score: 2

      Yes, my feelings are frequently hurt when I miss out on obvious pump and dump schemes. Spreading false stories to inflate the price of something is "making money off of bitcoin stories". Bit coin sure is a real "thing", a really annoying thing crawling with scammers, thieves, misinformation, and a rabid fanbase that crawls into the cracks of any discussion/forum like a cockroach.

    3. Re:AC called it by gatfirls · · Score: 1

      Good on you for singing the scam anthem "sorry you didn't get in on the ground floor of this excellent opportunity".

    4. Re:AC called it by generica1 · · Score: 1

      Why do you have such an emotional response to something that should really not matter to you, if you are not involved or were not involved with it?

      I'm not trolling... but you're seriously over-reacting to the existence of Bitcoin unless it did something bad to you. You're acting like there are no legal or legitimate uses for Bitcoin or users of Bitcoin, which is completely false.

      I think people should be allowed to engage in peer-to-peer trading of digital goods and services without a third party getting involved and so I think Bitcoin is an excellent option. It's too bad that everyone feels negatively towards Bitcoin. I think it may just be play money but so is every currency in the world that is government-issued, is the problem just that Bitcoin is not backed by military force or financial inertia? I just don't get why all the haters when it comes to this topic on Slashdot because it is perfectly legitimate to have a Bitcoin story on this website.

      Can you imagine how negative you should be feeling about actual cash? Considering how many drug dealers, pimps, human traffickers, and violent terrorists deal with USD it should obviously be painted in the same light, no? We should make it illegal! I know, maybe we can come up with some kind of digital replacement for cash! Oh wait...

      --
      JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP IRRIGATE
    5. Re:AC called it by generica1 · · Score: 1

      I'm just trying to understand what possible reasons someone would otherwise be so upset that someone else did this. It didn't hurt anyone except those who choose to get involved. And the "early adoption" period was more than an entire YEAR, and there was lots of noise about Bitcoin during that year, it wasn't some big secret private project, and the early adopters were not trying to keep it from being adopted and hoard coins for themselves but were instead trying to make sure as many people knew about it as quickly as possible (in other words they were eager to give up their advantage, for the growth of the network, as shown by the staggering growth of Bitcoin during this time). They did not know that Bitcoin was going to be as big as it has been. There have been lots of failed crypto-currencies that have came before this and the original developer was not even (as far as I can tell) actively involved in the community using the Bitcoin network, so I don't believe their interests were in pumping and dumping. Nobody could have predicted it was going to be as successful as it was.

      Imagine you took a huge risk and invested a ton of time into a project that had little to no chance of doing anything but using your GPU and CPU 24/7. What if in the end you woke up one morning and those coins you were mining at 300-500 a day were suddenly worth $30 a piece? Say you had several thousand because you started up the client and forgot about it and left it running on a server for several weeks, like some of my friends did. Would you hang on to all of them, or would you sell some? What answer did you choose and why?

      Does that make you a dishonest person, or a criminal in any way? Furthermore, what business is it of yours if someone else chose to mine Bitcoin and this happened to them? Why does this make you anti-Bitcoin, that it happened to them?

      The link someone posted earlier explaining how the technology worked from Wikipedia, and using it as evidence that it was a scam for the early adopters, was completely pulling that argument out of thin air because the description linked was a technical description and not any evidence of any wrong-doing or ill intentions by the early adopters of the technology. Because there is none.

      Further, anyone who wants to discuss or understand this currency instead of foaming at the mouth should really just start by reading the white paper the original author published. It's clear that rather than a scam Bitcoin was started with at the very least educational intentions, and at the very most liberating intentions for people to conduct transactions with privacy. Sure, if such a technology exists at all that allows for international trading to take place, then people are going to do bad things with it, but it is not the technology's fault, nor were the developers of Bitcoin ever anything but fully transparent about the project, its goals, its source code, its licensing, the ideal use of the currency, etc. Again, "Bitcoin doesn't kill people, people kill people". Bitcoin is a very clever and novel idea and was not a ponzi scheme, as there can not be a ponzi scheme without a central controller, and was not a pump and dump, as can be evidenced by the continued existence and ongoing value of Bitcoins. The prices are set by market forces. If agricultural crop prices are determined by supply and demand (thus indirectly affected by weather patterns and climate), does that make the weather a pump-and-dump scam for the farmer?

      People do bad things with cash, people use Bitcoins instead of cash. WHAT? BITCOIN DIDN'T MAKE THE BAD PEOPLE GOOD? BAD BITCOIN!

      --
      JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP IRRIGATE
  6. Re:Don't listen by Desler · · Score: 2

    True and it was sourced from a discussion in an IRC channel.

  7. a bitcoin credit card by nimbius · · Score: 3, Insightful

    from MasterCard...would introduce a serious flaw into the bitcoin model. Namely, the ability to override the corporate and political will of a major multinational financial processor with strong ties to the US Government.

    the huge appeal of BitCoin is the ability to treat it like anonymous cash, a privilege previously enjoyed only by the upper echelons of the rich and powerful as they finance things like proposition 8 or the next GOP candidate.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:a bitcoin credit card by geekoid · · Score: 1

      ", the ability to override the corporate and political will of a major multinational financial processor with strong ties to the US Government."
      BWahahaha.. no.
      The huge appeal of bitcoin is from people who don't understand macro economic.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:a bitcoin credit card by GuldKalle · · Score: 1

      the huge appeal of BitCoin is the ability to treat it like anonymous cash

      That's not how I see it. To me, the appeal is that it's not centralized, so nobody can decide for me that I can't support Assange. And if I don't agree with my bitcoin exchange, I can just use another. I can avoid monopolies like Visa/Mastercard

      --
      What?
  8. "BitCoin is to issue a credit card" by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 4, Funny

    BitCoin is going to issue a credit card right after LiNux opens up a app store and HTTp holds a networking conference.

    1. Re:"BitCoin is to issue a credit card" by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Don't all major distros come with a built-in app store? Sure, everything is free, but still...

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  9. Re:bitcoin is coming, deal with it financial fags by kelemvor4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not illegal now, and still bitcoin owners seem to be mostly criminals. The only significant use I've heard of for them are buying things on that online dope store.

  10. Re:No surprise by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

    Not to mention that Bitinstant described it as a debit card, not a credit card. Those are two very different beasts.

  11. Re:bitcoin is coming, deal with it financial fags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    this tells us more about you than about bitcoin.

  12. Re:bitcoin is coming, deal with it financial fags by mekkab · · Score: 1

    hey now, currency speculation is a noble, time-honored pursuit, and a perfectly legitimate way to round out your portfolio with some very risky investments.

    /no risk, no reward!

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  13. Its not MasterCard ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... its the banks that create the largest roadblock to a BitCoin (or other anonymous cash) based debit card. MasterCard could really care less about who keeps a particular bank account topped off in dollars. You would have to find a bank willing to accept the exchange rate risk and violations of various anti money laundering regulations.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  14. Re:bitcoin is coming, deal with it financial fags by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    LOL sounds like you must make a living as an exec at one of the world's major banks!

  15. Daily Bitcoin story? Check. by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    Today's Bitcoin story retracts yesterday's Bitcoin story, and tomorrow's will probably refute today's.

    Can we just stop with the Bitcoin horseshit already? The news about Bitcoin is just about as stable as the "currency."

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  16. Re:Daily Bitcoin story? Check. by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

    Did you know that modern web browsers have added new feature that will let you avoid reading stories which make you feel uncomfortable? All you have to do is not click on the link.

    Try it out sometime and see if it works on your browser.

  17. Market manipulation by catmistake · · Score: 1

    How strong did bitcoin get before investors dumped their bitcoins and developed a rumor to eliminate buying confidence and dramatically reduce the bitcoin value against the dollar? What was the bitcoin exchange rate trend before the story broke, and what is it now?

    I don't think that bitcoin development is a bad idea on its face (anonymous money), and I don't see any pyramid scam, but without regulation or oversight, the bitcoin market is ripe for manipulation with impunity.

  18. Getting money out of Bitcoin - the problem by Animats · · Score: 1

    The Bitcoin ecosystem has always had trouble converting Bitcoins to something more useful. Most of the ways to get money out of the Bitcoin system involve multiple intermediaries, payment rate limits, delays, and finger-pointing between the intermediaries when the system breaks. Mt. Gox finally, as of June 26, 2012, started offering wire transfers out of their system.

    Mt. Gox is in Japan, which allows non-banks to operate money transfer services. This is a new law from 2009, and specifically addresses electronic transfers and "server-based electronic money". In Japan, cell phone companies are in the money transfer business in a big way. Companies which take that route have to maintain a bank balance in a real bank representing all the customer assets they're holding. They cannot engage in "fractional reserve" banking, and they're supposed to be audited.

    Under this law, companies which offer "server-based electronic money", like gift cards, must have a bank balance of half the value stored. Bitcoin might be considered to qualify, which would reduce the reserves Mt. Gox must have in banks. Half the value of the Bitcoins Mt. Gox holds should be in a bank in a non-Bitcoin currency.

    It's not known if Mt. Gox is in compliance. There are supposed to be audits, but no figures have been published.

  19. Re:Non mastercard/visa credit is everywhere by slew · · Score: 1

    Then there are PIN based debit card for which transactions which Visa/Mastercard don't get their cut.

    Yes and no.

    PIN based debit cards have to go through some PIN network for processing. Historically, Visa and Mastercard steered PIN transaction towards their own PIN networks to get their cut (by sneaking in exclusivity clauses into processor agreements to force merchants into using visa-Interlink or mc-Maestro for V/MC logo'd PIN debit cards).

    Regulations in various countries (including the US now with the Durbin amendment), opened the door to a few competitor PIN networks like Star (first data corp), Pulse (discover), and NYCE (fidelity national) by banning these types of exclusivity agreements. But make not mistake about it, depending on the merchant's card processor, some company is getting a cut even if you use a PIN/debit because your bank is paying that company for the privledge of routing the transaction. Interlink and Maestro are still two of the biggest players in the business and they are the most common interchange networks for point-of-sale processor PIN transactions so it's still very likely that Visa and Mastercard are getting their cut (even from your non-logo'd PIN debit card)...

    Note that this does NOT depend on your card, nor your bank, but which card processor the merchant you do business with signed up for.

  20. Re:bitcoin is coming, deal with it financial fags by Urza9814 · · Score: 2

    Tells you what, that he reads Slashdot?

    http://news.slashdot.org/story/12/08/07/1910238/bitcoin-based-drug-market-silk-road-thriving-with-2-million-in-monthly-sales (posted about two weeks ago if you missed it)

    Other than some T-shirts and novelty things, and the (no longer accepted) EFF donations, that's the only use of Bitcoin I've yet read about...

  21. Re:Oh, slashdot... by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    Paying 0% transaction fees are a good deal. When you offer a good deal you expect word of mouth. Other transaction methods charge fees, often excessive fees. With the money gained from those fees and central control they pay for something called "advertising."

    Now it should be obvious to you that companies that use advertising are making enough profits OFF YOU to pay for that advertising.

    Now there are many parts of the BTC economy that do make profits, they should CERTAINLY have to pay for their advertising.

    There is a lot of interest in creating word of mouth using advertising dollars these days because the small minority of consumers who can do things like: math, comparison shopping, and reading reviews are influenced more by word of mouth than sheeple who "see - > want - > must have."

    I'm sure at some people people will do a study on how much stories like this increase the BTC economy. It's not hard to track given that banks take about 4 days to transfer new funds into a bitcoin exchange.

    Which is part of the reason BTC is successful.

  22. Re:BitCoin? by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    You have $100,000,000 gold? Wow. You might want to go outside.

  23. Re:bitcoin is coming, deal with it financial fags by Teppy · · Score: 1

    Well, I'll slashvertize my game: Dragon's Tale is a gambling MMORPG where every physical object in the world is a different sort of novel gambling game. Some are skill based, some pure luck. It's like Disney World for gamblers, and it accepts *only* Bitcoin. I'm also the designer of A Tale in the Desert, a game that's been covered on Slashdot and pretty much every major gaming site (back in the day - it was released in 2003) and is pretty highly regarded.

    So now you know of two places that use Bitcoins. Oh, and if you look here you'll find several thousand more. (But I suppose then you could no longer say "I've yet to read about...")

  24. Remember the original story????? by AssholeMcGee+ · · Score: 1

    The first post of Bitcoin was about creating a credit/ATM card. The original story mentions MaterCard but this is to explain how widely used the card could become. This had nothing to do with actually cutting a deal with MaterCard from them to make the card or be involved in this project. Obviously they would not be involved because they cannot hoard the money to themselves. And they rates of the card from MaterCard fees would pretty much kill the idea. I questioned the idea of BitCoin creating a card becuase of other slashdot stories over there lack of security among other problems.

  25. Statement from BitInstant by Tuxavant · · Score: 1

    http://blog.bitinstant.com/blog/2012/8/22/public-statement-regarding-the-bitinstant-paycard.html "BitInstant’s partners, who are issuing the card, have been working with MasterCard for many years, and the specific relationship will be between these partners and MasterCard (not directly between MasterCard and BitInstant)."