Slashdot Mirror


Phony Laser Security System Proves Perception Is Reality

Hugh Pickens writes writes "Softpedia reports that Global Link Security Solutions are offering a product that doesn't actually do anything to alert an owner of a break-in to their home or business, but it displays "one hell of a laser show in an attempt to scare potential crooks into thinking that they have no chance of breaking in without triggering the alarm." According to the security firm, LaserScan has four lines of protection: a number of lasers that move along the walls and floors (video), an LED which indicates that there's a "link" to a satellite, a beeping alert, and a sticker placed on the front door. Although the company claims that none of their current customers has reported break-ins since the system has been installed, security guru Bruce Schneier highlights that the product only works if the product isn't very widely known."

243 comments

  1. Um, duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How is this anything more than a high-tech version of the old "Beware of guard dog" signs?

    1. Re:Um, duh? by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      How is this anything more than a high-tech version of the old "Beware of guard dog" signs?

      Because it involves a laser or something which looks like one or is shiny (oooh!)

      I see signs in a lot of yards Property Protected by Prominent Sounding Security Company.

      I also see a lot of PRIVATE ROAD signs thrown up on public back roads to discourage adventurers. Google maps is pretty good, though for following right of ways and such.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Um, duh? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Where I used to work there was someone who put up no parking signs on their fence. I guess they parked their RV in their yard and wanted to be able to get it in and out. The city allows for a driveway, but you can't just say your entire frontage is no parking. Even so, the sign ensured that spot was almost always vacant. I parked there for a couple of years.

    3. Re:Um, duh? by SomePgmr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't suppose it is... but that doesn't mean it's not doing the job.

      Probably best to back up the high-visibility deterrent with a real camera and alarm system though. At very least for the insurance aspect.

    4. Re:Um, duh? by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Everyone seems to be forgetting the most important aspect to security systems like this.....most thieves are crackheads and crackheads? Not the brightest bulbs. Like that old saying "You don't have to outrun the bear, just the other guy" the same thing applies here, as criminals are lazy and stupid and will go for the easiest mark. Will they think it may be fake? Sure but who wants to risk a 3-5 just to find out, when the building next door doesn't have anything at all protecting it?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    5. Re:Um, duh? by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      The sharks probably improve the defenses a bit.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    6. Re:Um, duh? by icebike · · Score: 1

      I don't suppose it is... but that doesn't mean it's not doing the job

      Exactly.
      The Alarm company warning labels and signs are almost as effective as the alarms themselves. I know many people who subscribed for a year during some promo, then discontinued the service when the free-period was over. Left the signs in place.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    7. Re:Um, duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sensational headline is sensational.

      It would be fair to call this "phony" if customers thought it was real.
      From what I read it is the criminals who don't know it's fake.

    8. Re:Um, duh? by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      The bad buys will think they have guard sharks.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    9. Re:Um, duh? by sjames · · Score: 1

      The guard dog sign is more believable?

    10. Re:Um, duh? by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's clear in their ad that their selling this IN ADDITION to a regular security system. It's just supposed scare off the thief before they break your window and you've got to pay a deductible. When I was in highschool I worked at a pizza shop. Every night the owner would close out the till, take the money drawer out and sit it on the counter, turn the register around and leave the drawer wide open facing the front window. I asked him why he did it and he said he had 3 break-ins where they had busted the front window and destroyed his cash register just to find out it was empty. Each time he had to pay $1000 deductible. Finally his insurance agent told him what to do with the cash register and he never had another break-in.

    11. Re:Um, duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any idiot knows that all the money is taken out of cash registers each night. Therefore, the break-ins were not done by just any idiot. They were either done by an exceptionally dumb idiot (in which case, they wouldn't catch the clue of the register being on display empty), or someone not an idiot (ie: someone who knows there is no money there, who has another purpose for the break-ins).

    12. Re:Um, duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if that were the case, it's trivial to dispatch a dog. A laser trip alarm is going to prove much more difficult to bypass, provided that you are not 100% certain it is fake.

    13. Re:Um, duh? by niftydude · · Score: 1

      How is this anything more than a high-tech version of the old "Beware of guard dog" signs?

      Yeah, there is also the plethora of dummy security cameras that have been around for ages to act as a deterrent: http://www.ebay.com.au/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p3907.m570.l1311&_nkw=dummy+security+camera&_sacat=See-All-Categories

      --
      You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
    14. Re:Um, duh? by rs79 · · Score: 1

      It might be fake. But if they do an upgrade that actually does something, how's the perp gonna know?

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    15. Re:Um, duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Fun fact I learned from dealing with wildlife up here in Canada: If you and a slower person are running from a bear, the bear will catch the slower person and immediately go after the still fleeing person because of their instinct to chase. The slower person can then hypothetically run away because they aren't in the bear's line of sight anymore.

      TL;DR: It's better to be the slower person running from the bear.

    16. Re:Um, duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're reading it wrong. It's "Phony Laser" Security System Proves Perception Is Reality.

      See, the lasers don't actually cut the intruders into tiny cubes, so we dub them phoney.

    17. Re:Um, duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like that old saying "You don't have to outrun the bear, just the other guy"

      Just common sense. Kind of like using Linux instead of Windows, right Hairy?

    18. Re:Um, duh? by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well you have to put yourself in the mindset of a crackhead, you're hurting, you want to just grab and GTFO so you can go swap the loot to a dealer for a rock, so are you REALLY gonna sit there and try to suss out whether its a real system or not? When there is a place next door that looks clean? Nope you aren't gonna waste a second thought, you'll be moving on.

      After all it isn't like the car thieves where they already know how much that make/model vehicle is worth, they don't know if there is anything really good, or anything their dealer will take, so they are gonna go for the least risk every time. I used to do ride alongs with a friend that was county PD and we'd see time and time again even those lame fake "protected by" signs would often be enough to get them to move on to the next house.

      That said I really can't see paying $200 for the thing when I was able to get my dad a nice 4 camera system for his shop with 500Gb DVR for just $230 shipped from Tiger. I gotta go by there next week to set up the Android phone access (man I'm dreading that, I just know it'll be a PITA) but it took him less than an hour to have it up and recording the inside and outside of his shop 24/7 and the unit is hidden in a back drawer of a junked up corner of the shop so I seriously doubt any crackhead would find it. At least with that if someone does break in we'll have a nice vid to hand the cops.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    19. Re:Um, duh? by lightknight · · Score: 3, Funny

      Which is why you use elephants.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    20. Re:Um, duh? by davester666 · · Score: 2

      Why elephants? They are SO much cheaper to subvert using peanuts. You need to buy more expensive meat for the dogs.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    21. Re:Um, duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sensational headline is sensational.

      It would be fair to call this "phony" if customers thought it was real.
      From what I read it is the criminals who don't know it's fake.

      they do now :)

    22. Re:Um, duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That my friend is not somthing you share, lest others catch on.

    23. Re:Um, duh? by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      At least with that if someone does break in we'll have a nice vid to hand the cops.

      And the damage from the break in to deal with.

      --
      bickerdyke
    24. Re:Um, duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But with crack, you don't hurt. You're thinking of opiates.

    25. Re:Um, duh? by squizzar · · Score: 1

      Same as all the parked up lorries (18-wheelers or whatever everyone else calls them) leaving their doors open when they're sleeping in a lay-by overnight. They still have to worry about then is someone stealing their diesel though...

    26. Re:Um, duh? by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      ...most thieves are crackheads and crackheads? Not the brightest bulbs.

      That's so rude. Look at it another way: bright bulbs aren't exactly environment friendly are they?

    27. Re:Um, duh? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      The "Beware of guard dog" sign doesn't bark.

    28. Re:Um, duh? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Everyone seems to be forgetting the most important aspect to security systems like this.....most thieves are crackheads and crackheads? Not the brightest bulbs.

      Crackhead bulbs are still brighter than all the people posting "This won't work because it's fake!!!" in here...

      --
      No sig today...
    29. Re:Um, duh? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure but who wants to risk a 3-5 just to find out, when the building next door doesn't have anything at all protecting it?

      The building having nothing at all to protect it probably doesn't have anything at all worth stealing either...
      This is the double-edged sword of visible alarm systems, fake or otherwise: nothing screams "lots of loot inside!" louder than an obvious alarm system...

    30. Re:Um, duh? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2

      That said I really can't see paying $200 for the thing when I was able to get my dad a nice 4 camera system for his shop with 500Gb DVR for just $230 shipped from Tiger.

      So the thief will just steal the 500Gb DVR as well... Better set up an instant offsite backup system as well, but you better plan appropriate bandwidth for that... (or else the thief will have stolen the unit before it has finished uploading his pix)

    31. Re:Um, duh? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      Same as all the parked up lorries (18-wheelers or whatever everyone else calls them) leaving their doors open when they're sleeping in a lay-by overnight.

      hmmm, and I guess, if they sleep on their belly, they're concerned about active "thieves", whereas if they sleep on their back, they're concerned about passive "thieves"... :-)

    32. Re:Um, duh? by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 2

      No, but you do "jones" - being filled with the overwhelming desire to do more coke/crack to get back that high.

      Or, as I used call it, the "I ain't got no more fuckin' coke blues"... Usually lasts from 15-20 min to 3-4 hours after the last line/rock is gone, depending on how high you are/were and how badly you are/were addicted.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    33. Re:Um, duh? by Erikderzweite · · Score: 3, Funny

      Let me guess, you were the slower one, right? Condolences about your friend though.

    34. Re:Um, duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you have to put yourself in the mindset of a crackhead,

      Easy for you...

    35. Re:Um, duh? by marsu_k · · Score: 1

      Offtopic, but as a matter of fact you shouldn't even try to run away from an attacking bear, just "duck and cover" (lay on your stomach, cover your head and neck with your arms, play dead). The bear will always outrun you.

      (A single chapter is TL;DR? Have we really reached a point where we can't maintain our attent - SQUIRREL!)

    36. Re:Um, duh? by Sulphur · · Score: 5, Funny

      It might be fake. But if they do an upgrade that actually does something, how's the perp gonna know?

      There is a car with a light show on top, and a guy in an arresting blue outfit.

    37. Re:Um, duh? by TheCarp · · Score: 3, Funny

      We were going out to some shitty nightclub one night. Was in Boston, over by "Giliians", which I don't think is there anymore, back when Axis and Avalon were still around. I was looking for parking down the main parking drag, and see an open spot...with a sign... it looked like a legitimate city posted temporary "No Parking" sign....

      except... the center part said "fridays" with no date... and it was attached to the parking meter with string....poorly...

      We just laughed, parked there, and tossed the sign under the car, which was probably the plan of whoever put it there.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    38. Re:Um, duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That said I really can't see paying $200 for the thing when I was able to get my dad a nice 4 camera system for his shop with 500Gb DVR for just $230 shipped from Tiger. ...At least with that if someone does break in we'll have a nice vid to hand the cops.

      Awesome. That should definitely be helpful. "This is an APB. We're looking for a white or not white male or female, age 14 to 65, approximately 5' 6" to 6' tall. Suspect wearing dark clothing and a ski mask."

    39. Re:Um, duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what insurance is for.

    40. Re:Um, duh? by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Bull elephants. And that drainage ditch you crossed, that one filled with what looked like water? You guessed it -> female elephant hormones.

      You know have some very angry elephants that think your feet have been getting freaky with their girls.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    41. Re:Um, duh? by Talderas · · Score: 2

      The only way to subvert elephants is to use magma.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    42. Re:Um, duh? by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Well. That dashes my dreams of Resident Evil inspired home defense.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    43. Re:Um, duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Duck and cover" works on just about anything from black bears to nuclear bombs!

    44. Re:Um, duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want a laser pointer moving around, just tape a laser pointer to the top of an oscellating fan, itself out of view from windows. I'm sure there's some USB-powered laser pointer kicking around online (and adapters to plug that into a wall outlet are a dime a dozen).

      Hell, my cats might get some exercise running back and forth all day when I'm at work.

    45. Re:Um, duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least with that if someone does break in we'll have a nice vid to hand the cops.

      I can assure you they'll be laughing at you, internally when you give them the tape, and externally when they're driving away. Unless you're Steve Jobs, a politician, or related to a police officer, no one is going to even look at it. The "investigation" will be just a call to your local pawn shops, where they won't recall anyone suspicious looking to unload a bunch of stuff that matches your list either because they really don't or they're lying.

    46. Re:Um, duh? by Applekid · · Score: 1

      That said I really can't see paying $200 for the thing when I was able to get my dad a nice 4 camera system for his shop with 500Gb DVR for just $230 shipped from Tiger. ...At least with that if someone does break in we'll have a nice vid to hand the cops.

      Awesome. That should definitely be helpful. "This is an APB. We're looking for a white or not white male or female, age 14 to 65, approximately 5' 6" to 6' tall. Suspect wearing dark clothing and a ski mask."

      Suspect breathes air, I repeat, suspect breathes air

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    47. Re:Um, duh? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      That said I really can't see paying $200 for the thing when I was able to get my dad a nice 4 camera system for his shop with 500Gb DVR for just $230 shipped from Tiger.

      Well, which of those is more likely to reduce the likelihood that your house is broken into?

      A DVR security system with cameras is going to fetch a decent price at a pawn shop. Those lasers probably have no resale value, but unlike the cameras (which they plan to take) are going to have an increased likelihood of actually inhibiting actual burglary. They don't have to be actively monitored to work.

      There's no reason you couldn't do both. :)

      For an extra couple hundred dollars, you could put bars on the windows, too. It's not an all or nothing proposition: like all security, it's a sliding scale.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    48. Re:Um, duh? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The building having nothing at all to protect it probably doesn't have anything at all worth stealing either

      Wrong. Most burglaries are in low income areas, because that's where the theives live. A crackhead can take a shelf full of DVDs and sell them for two dollars each, ten DVDs and he has his rock. Almost any pawn shop will buy them, no questions asked, whereas if you take a TV or a guitar there, you're going to jump through a few hoops that may send you to jail.

      That said, I miss my Epiphone a lot more than my DVDs :(

    49. Re:Um, duh? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Actually there is too much traffic outside the shop for a thief to want to spend the time hunting for the DVR, in fact every theft in that area has been things like tires off the vehicles or the trailers they use to carry large loads. Thieves really don't wanna spend one second more than they have to and if they can pop the lock off one of those toolboxes on the back of a truck that's $200-$500+ in tools and takes less than 3 minutes from start to driving away, hence why I put in the DVR.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    50. Re:Um, duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, assuming the theif finds it. Depends on what threat we're defending against here: smash-and-grab, or planned attack? Maybe it's a convenience store and there's nothing that's that worth stealing.

    51. Re:Um, duh? by nobodie · · Score: 1

      An old friend of mine, now probably deceased, had been working at a local state home for the profoundly retarded. He replaced a door that had a sign on it that said "Mental Handicap." Being a playful sort he gave the sign to me (it being the perfect size for a dashboard) with the suggestion that I use it as a handicapped parking permit. I took it one step further and used it as a "park wherever the hell I want" permit. It worked, for 4 or 5 years until (because I also didn't need to lock my truck because of the sign) somebody stole it. Bastards!

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
    52. Re:Um, duh? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      Sign up for Security system monitoring....cancel after one month with installed stickers and signage. Works like a champ. Better yet, 'borrow' a sign from someone else and just put it in your yard.

      Anyone looking to break in will just go to the next house without a sign.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    53. Re:Um, duh? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      You need to buy more expensive meat for the dogs.

      Hardly

      Look, defenseless babies!

      And you're free.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    54. Re:Um, duh? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      Why? Because of the smell of dead and rotting sharks (with lasers on heads) lying on the floor?

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  2. As long.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...as it is not widely known.

    Posting it on Slashdot sounds like a great idea. :)

    1. Re:As long.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely Slashdot readers have little overlap with petty criminals that need to resort to physical break-ins. Cyber crimes have far greater yield with much lower risk and effort.

      Welp, there's my stab at a paraprosdokian. =3

    2. Re:As long.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Because all burglers check /. regularly ...

      Well... maybe a couple comic store robberies could be linked to the Slashdot readers...

    3. Re:As long.. by c0lo · · Score: 1

      ...as it is not widely known.

      Actually - if there would be a real (non-phony) system that is mimed by this one...

      Posting it on Slashdot sounds like a great idea. :)

      I wonder how many (would be or accomplished) burglars read /.? Should one start a "/. poll"?

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    4. Re:As long.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many crackhead thieves do you think frequent /. enough to see this story?

    5. Re:As long.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (if your crooks can get better security than you, then you do have a problem).

  3. d'oh! by multiben · · Score: 4, Funny

    the product only works if the product isn't very widely known - lol.

    1. Re:d'oh! by EkriirkE · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Security by Obscurity.

      --
      from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    2. Re:d'oh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Security by obscurity has always been the most viable choice. /s

    3. Re:d'oh! by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1, Funny

      Who wants to knock off a bike shop and motorcycle shop tonight? I've got it on very good authority that they only use chincy light shows and don't have any worthwhile deterrents.

    4. Re:d'oh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Step 1: Create a fake security system.
      Step 2: Publicize the fact that it is fake.
      Step 3: Create a real security system that looks exactly the same, so that everyone thinks it's fake.
      Step 4: Install the real security system in your home or business.
      Step 5: ???
      Step 6: Profit!

    5. Re:d'oh! by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      The presence of a visible deterrent doesn't preclude having a real one as well. The best security is both, that's why real car alarms often have the flashing LED on the dash, even if the fakes copied it and have them as well. Maybe their goal is to deter the drunks and opportunists, and the dedicated thieves wouldn't care anyway.

    6. Re:d'oh! by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      ??? == your house or business gets damaged causing either a huge increase in your home insurance and loss of any cost benefit to having an alarm in the first place, or you have to pay out of pocket. Thieves aren't gentle when they break in. The thieves will likely do some extra trashing since they're pissed an alarm went off (know over a TV, smash a plate glass window, etc.). And likely the thieves will get away with a ton because the police know that 95% of all alarm calls are false alarms and wait for the alarm company to try to call you first to determine if it is a real break in, and then they call the police. So the thieves know they actually have enough time to gather stuff up, drink one of your beers (or two), have a shit in your toilet and not flush it (or on your carpet), and then fuck off with the loot and not get caught.

      ??? == lose money. Nice try.

      Better idea: get an alarm from a real company (brinks, adt, etc) and put their sticker on the door. Or just get one of their stickers and put it on the door. Some thieves won't give a shit anyway just as I mentioned. But more will because they know there is an actual company that has some sort of reputation to protect behind it, and not just a flashing light show.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    7. Re:d'oh! by StillAnonymous · · Score: 4, Funny

      I make my doors 35% narrower than most. That way, the fat crooks can't get in. Security through Obesity.

    8. Re:d'oh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Security by Obscurity.

      The saying is that you should not rely only on obscurity. It's a perfectly valid piece in an overall system, it's just not good to use it without a backup plan in the event your obscurity vanishes. And in the case of the article, this is being sold as part of a real system. The purpose of this portion is to deter thieves from smashing your windows and setting off the actual system and costing you a fortune in insurance deductibles. The fact that the yard lasers don't actually set off an alarm is irrelevant in this case.

    9. Re:d'oh! by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Security by Obscurity.

      Is a valuable part of the security tool box - the bad guys can't be prepared for a security measure they aren't aware of.

    10. Re:d'oh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I though most crooks were drug addicts? They are gonna be skinny most of the time.

    11. Re:d'oh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not convincend the bike shop owner actually knows how this system functions (or doesn't). In the video he said "were were in the shop a couple times when it went off". What do you mean, went off? The system is fake.

    12. Re:d'oh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but you are wrong. In this case, the correct answer is:

      ??? == start up a window and door repair business on the side.

      Steps 3 and 4 were just fake steps to divert your attention from the real money maker. Too much competition is bad for business.

    13. Re:d'oh! by Amouth · · Score: 1

      thats meth and crack heads, around here we just have stoners. and everyone knows stoners all have the munchies.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    14. Re:d'oh! by madhi19 · · Score: 1

      Plus weed is so cheap stoners really don't need to steal to get some! lolll

    15. Re:d'oh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple lawsuit incoming...

    16. Re:d'oh! by toddestan · · Score: 1

      How do you get in?

  4. just like fake cctv cameras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    until the cops show up and spend the next 20 minutes laughing at you because instead of spending money on a real security system, you chose to blow it on a song and dance system.
    criminals are dumb, but it seems this companies customers are dumber

    1. Re:just like fake cctv cameras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      indeed, if you are going to buy the cameras and installation...may as well get the TV and DVR/recording device too.

    2. Re:just like fake cctv cameras by JeffAtl · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the footage from real cameras is often useless for burglaries as well because the cameras are mounted so high that they don't capture anyone's face. There's a burglary ring in Atlanta that breaks into clothing stores and steals high end jeans ($200+). They've been captured on camera for over a year, but all that is ever revealed is the top of their heads.

      Even if a person's face is captured, cops don't really care that much about break ins so it's rare that they'd investigate it anyway. They'd really only care if you could identity the person or if they thought it was part of a more serious crime spree. Cops feel that property crimes are covered by insurance so why should they care.

      The only footage that I've ever seen that has been useful has been from behind the counter that captures an armed robbery.

  5. Easy to determine that it's fake by Hentes · · Score: 3, Informative

    Real alarms use infralasers.

    1. Re:Easy to determine that it's fake by Phixxr · · Score: 5, Funny

      Real companies use tripods when they shoot promo videos.

      --
      ungggghhhh
    2. Re:Easy to determine that it's fake by EdIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

      and... real criminals are not always that smart and get their working knowledge of security systems from Hollywood movies.

      I'm willing to bet real money that if you took a sampling of 1000 prisoners (guilty of robbery) and showed them the video, 990 would believe it was a real laser security system.

      If the criminal was sophisticated enough to know better, chances are they would walk into the place in broad daylight and use social engineering instead.

      Now, if you *really* wanted to fuck with the criminals you would also install the infrared lasers and have a really big mean fucking dog set to be loose once the lasers were tripped.... and have a cage slam down in the front preventing escape.

    3. Re:Easy to determine that it's fake by jimmydevice · · Score: 1

      Interesting idea. Pay prisoners to evaluate security systems and have the equipment suppliers pay. Of course, Prison-Corp will take their cut from yet another revenue stream.

    4. Re:Easy to determine that it's fake by EdIII · · Score: 1

      That's a slippery slope.

      At first they will just evaluate, which will be boring. Then install the tracking devices around their necks so they can do onsite testing. Start video taping the testing. A reality tv show is developed.

      Then bam! Running Man.

    5. Re:Easy to determine that it's fake by MarioMax · · Score: 1

      If the criminal was sophisticated enough to know better, chances are they would walk into the place in broad daylight and use social engineering instead.

      Or they'd just say "fuck it", walk into the place in broad daylight wearing a ski mask and carrying a rifle, grab what he wants, and high-tail it before the cops show up.

    6. Re:Easy to determine that it's fake by Tanktalus · · Score: 1

      But if the criminal doesn't know it's there, it's not much of a deterrant. Maybe those real alarms should use visible-spectrum lasers. Or maybe both. Too bad this is now patented, depending on the language, competitors may not be able to do anything. Then again, I think this solution really is novel, and is relatively deserving of patent licensing fees.

    7. Re:Easy to determine that it's fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Then bam! Running Man.

      If you use more serious lasers you can have Burning Man.

    8. Re:Easy to determine that it's fake by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Real alarms use infralasers.

      I had a friend once that got mad at his roommate over some squabble, suddenly moved out, and threatened to call the cops and tell them that he had pot in his house. The guy replied with: "Your DNA is on the bong." The dude immediately dropped his grudge.

      Thank you CSI!

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    9. Re:Easy to determine that it's fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now if you really did that ... the guy would get hurt bad,he would get chewed up by the dog, get arrested, get taken to the hospital, taken to jail, put in front of a judge, get sentenced and get taken to prison.

      YOU however, would get arrested, go in front of a judge, be sentenced and taken to prison, get your teeth kicked in by him and his friends, get taken to the hospital, get taken to see the prison dentist and get out of prison years after he did.

    10. Re:Easy to determine that it's fake by asmkm22 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't really matter. If a potential thief has a choice between a house with no obvious alarm and one that has lasers going all over the place, they'll go for the former.

    11. Re:Easy to determine that it's fake by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      Does the generic thief know this?

      Why not have both systems, with this faux system as an "alert" that the property owner is aware of and actively counterracting breakins, possibly by an alarm system. In other words, why would one take the chance?

    12. Re:Easy to determine that it's fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100 MW infra lasers.....

    13. Re:Easy to determine that it's fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Armed robbery is a considerably more serious offense in most areas.

    14. Re:Easy to determine that it's fake by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Honestly, what so difficult about including a cellphone backup on the alarm system? Most places you can get a signal, and even in places you cannot, try a booster. Costs, what, $20 in parts, plus some agreement with a cell carrier for a few pennies a month.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    15. Re:Easy to determine that it's fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real alarms use infralasers.

      If the purpose of the alarm is to alert you to a break-in, then yes. If the purpose is to prevent a break-in from being attempted in the first place they're worthless.

    16. Re:Easy to determine that it's fake by Mirvnillith · · Score: 1

      This. Even for an actual working laser scanning intrusion detection system it would make sense to have visible beams for deterrent.

    17. Re:Easy to determine that it's fake by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to bet real money that if you took a sampling of 1000 prisoners (guilty of robbery) and showed them the video, 990 would believe it was a real laser security system.

      You realize that the ones in prison are the dumbest 10% of the criminals? That leaves the 90% who are smart enough to not get caught.

      If the criminal was sophisticated enough to know better, chances are they would walk into the place in broad daylight and use social engineering instead.

      If this was for a business rather than a home, they'll have additional security (like a real alarm system). Now tell me, how is a stranger going to social engineer his way into your home?

    18. Re:Easy to determine that it's fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is short term analysis, in the long term someone WILL come up with real lasers to mince the crook, so you ll ride the bus for free getting the placebo system and a few widely known stories of crooks maimed with real lasers. It is no joke, I fended off burglars just by keeping a light and computer/TV on. They broke when they finally shortcircuited the electric power, but only the first time; the second time I would not leave the place. I ll wait for the real lasers. Danilo J Bonsignore

    19. Re:Easy to determine that it's fake by davewoods · · Score: 1

      This... Could... Actually happen. Wow. Go America!

    20. Re:Easy to determine that it's fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Door to door salesman. Guy wanting to talk about Jesus. Lady who asks to use the phone. Fellow claiming to be with the US Census.

      There are plenty of people who can fool a certain segment of the population into letting them in the house.

  6. Bruce underestimates the value of theater by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The thing about "security theater", is that it's not 100% useless - it provides a very real psychological deterrent to someone thinking about breaking in.

    Even if a criminal knew such a system was not real, they would not know it was not also paired with a real alarm system, or perhaps this version was real somehow. The kind of people breaking into things generally are not that well educated, so how could they really tell if the system was fake or not even knowing fake systems existed?

    The problem with security theater in airports is that it causes way too much grief to outweigh the deterrence gained. But in this case there is no downside and the system would be very cheap to install.

    True anecdote - when going to a summer college I had a car I had to park in a remote lot. I installed an LED I could turn on with a switch, that just sat there blinking.

    The ONE DAY I forgot to turn on that switch, someone broke into my car and took a $10 cassette player (the window cost more than $50 to replace). After that I remembered every time to turn on my "alarm" and never had a problem again.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Bruce underestimates the value of theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The key to theft deterrent is to be a more difficult/risky target than your neighbor.

    2. Re:Bruce underestimates the value of theater by jxander · · Score: 1

      If you and a halfling are being chased by a dragon ...

      --
      This signature is false.
    3. Re:Bruce underestimates the value of theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you and a halfling are being chased by a dragon ...

      ... remember that the halfling has a better shot at your knees than you do at his.

    4. Re:Bruce underestimates the value of theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was a teenager I went through a, shall we say "phase", anyways there's this really great device we used to test alarm systems, it allowed us to get into suspicious looking cars, buildings, houses with "beware of dog signs", etc. the devices weren't always available and didn't work 100%, but once we figured out you could collect and throw rocks at anything before risking our hides. Your car, would have been toast, the lasers thing probably would have scared the jeebers out of me the first night, but you always go back when you see shit like that. A lot of alarms in the early nineties were BS, most cameras too, dogs were the worst, but you ring the doorbell 50 times and virtually any dog will bark. This is penetration testing.

    5. Re:Bruce underestimates the value of theater by EdIII · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you and a halfling are being chased by a dragon ...

      ... remember that the halfling has a better shot at your knees than you do at his.

      Yes, but you can pick the halfling up and toss him towards the dragon's mouth. Which I have actually done before playing role playing games. Buddy was not amused.

    6. Re:Bruce underestimates the value of theater by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 2

      Where I grew up, I found that simply having alarm company stickers on your door was good enough to stop burglars. There are plenty enough houses there without any sort of security system. Even tweakers understand the idea of going after the low-hanging fruit.

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    7. Re:Bruce underestimates the value of theater by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

      Also, my car has an "alarm system" factory installed. I'm pretty sure the only thing it does is has a flashing LED. I've never heard it go off. I don't know what it sounds like if it did. So far, no break ins, though.

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    8. Re:Bruce underestimates the value of theater by nemesisrocks · · Score: 1

      The thing about "security theater", is that it's not 100% useless - it provides a very real psychological deterrent to someone thinking about breaking in.

      The whole point of most security systems -- even alarm systems -- is to pose a deterrent. Most break-ins are crimes of opportunity, not elaborate schemes planned over periods of months. Alarm systems are fairly inept nowadays: when you last heard your neighbour's alarm go off, did you drop in to investigate, or just presume it was broken again?

      The effectiveness of the "security theatre" was demonstrated in a very personal way for me a few years ago. Some criminals went on a rampage looking for cash and valuables, and broke into every car on the street -- that didn't have a flashing red light. My sister's car, A Hyundai Excel, arguably one of the easiest cars to break into, was left untouched, because her aftermarket immobiliser happened to have a flashing red light on the dash. No alarm, no stickers, just a simple red light.

    9. Re:Bruce underestimates the value of theater by mike449 · · Score: 1

      I have a counter-anecdote to tell. I had an LED blinker in my car, attached with a piece of velcro. The car was stolen and then recovered within a week. The only damage was the ignition lock, and the only item stolen from the car was the LED blinker.

    10. Re:Bruce underestimates the value of theater by sjames · · Score: 1

      It probably keeps the tigers away too :-)

    11. Re:Bruce underestimates the value of theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If and when I get my own vehicle, if it doesn't come pre-equipped with a red LED I am going to order some LM3909 ICs and some "car alarm armed" stickers.

    12. Re:Bruce underestimates the value of theater by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      The whole point of most security systems -- even alarm systems -- is to pose a deterrent. Most break-ins are crimes of opportunity, not elaborate schemes planned over periods of months. Alarm systems are fairly inept nowadays: when you last heard your neighbour's alarm go off, did you drop in to investigate, or just presume it was broken again?

      The ones that are unmonitored are generally considered noisemakers. This includes car alarms as well.

      The only way a security system can provide any protection is if it's actively monitored by a company, and yes, that can include paying alarm fees and licenses. The better ones provide direct voice links to the monitoring center so sounds of breakin can be verified ahead of time.

    13. Re:Bruce underestimates the value of theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The kind of people breaking into things generally are not that well educated, so how could they really tell if the system was fake or not even knowing fake systems existed?

      You do not need an education to spot a fake system. Besides this system is not supposed to be an alarm, but be used to put off the burglar before they enter and set of the real alarm system.

    14. Re:Bruce underestimates the value of theater by squizzar · · Score: 1

      Pop the hood, lock the doors with the remote (presuming you have one) then actually open the hood, that usually sets the alarm off...

    15. Re:Bruce underestimates the value of theater by DMiax · · Score: 1

      If you and a halfling are being chased by a dragon ...

      ... remember that the halfling has a better shot at your knees than you do at his.

      Yes, but you can pick the halfling up and toss him towards the dragon's mouth. Which I have actually done before playing role playing games. Buddy was not amused.

      I bet he was upset he would miss the roleplaying session

    16. Re:Bruce underestimates the value of theater by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you can pick the halfling up and toss him towards the dragon's mouth.

      ... and after gulping down the halfling, the dragon will still be hungry...

    17. Re:Bruce underestimates the value of theater by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Security theater isn't theater, it's like a simple, cheap lock.

      A simple lock keeps weak people with little intelligence or creativity out. It can also be used as a trigger for a more effective security system. Security theater keeps dullards out due to a show of presence, and can possibly hide or otherwise obscure the actual security mechanisms in place.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    18. Re:Bruce underestimates the value of theater by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Also, on anecdotes:

      I've got an older (1980s) Chevy. Driving in Berkeley, CA every day is a sure way to put your vehicle under scrutiny for theft. I locked my doors every day. Unfortunately, due to the vehicle's vintage, it's fairly easy to jimmy a lock (easier and safer than breaking the window), and that was done twice with small things stolen - glow plugs for the engine I hadn't put in yet, and misc. electronics crap I had in there as parts.

      So I decided to just leave the vehicle unlocked with the windows down, and nothing obvious in plain sight. I had several hundred dollars+ in tools under the passenger seat almost every single day, but I never had a problem again unless I left a pack of smokes on the dash (which would almost always be stolen).

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    19. Re:Bruce underestimates the value of theater by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Another way is to open a window, shut off the car, get out and lock the doors. Wait a minute or two, then reach in and open the door through the open window. I've set mine off (by accident) that way a few times.

    20. Re:Bruce underestimates the value of theater by dj245 · · Score: 1

      If you ever forget your keys, or lock them inside your car you will find out. The locksmith used a rod to flip the "unlock" button on my Subaru, and when he opened the door, the alarm went off. I didn't even know it had an alarm until then.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  7. Not entirely correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The product also works if there is a similar product that actually triggers an alarm but is indistinguishable from the fake security system.

    Compare that with fake security cameras - it doesn't matter if they are widely known or not. If they can't be distinguished from a real camera by the criminal, they will have an effect.

    1. Re:Not entirely correct by tompaulco · · Score: 2

      The product also works if there is a similar product that actually triggers an alarm but is indistinguishable from the fake security system.
      I can vouch that my house is 99.9% as safe now with the ADT sign and all of the equipment installed and turned on, but without monitoring as it was when I was paying for monitoring. I might even have continued paying for monitoring if the Fire Department hadn't threatened to start charging me for the numerous false alarms caused by ADTs crappy and yet somehow expensive hardware.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    2. Re:Not entirely correct by stepho-wrs · · Score: 1
  8. It will sell by bhlowe · · Score: 4, Informative

    Every good security tech will suggest adding similar measures-- Security signs, dummy cameras, NRA member stickers, fake dog bark noises, even putting a huge dog bowl on the back porch. Just being a little harder target than the guy down the street helps. Criminals are usually not bright enough to figure out which threats are real or imagined.

    1. Re:It will sell by louic · · Score: 1

      It may be a deterrent for YOUR house, but the burglars will go to your neighbors, forcing them to install alarms (fake or not), etc. Very profitable indeed!

    2. Re:It will sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Criminals are usually not bright enough to figure out which threats are real or imagined.

      That's not necessarily the case. As you yourself said, the easier target is the one with no protection at all, real or fake. Intelligence has nothing to do with it.

      When our house (and 7 others on the block) were broken into in 2004, the detective who came later told us that the crooks look for places they can get into and out of in a minute or two. It's not even worth their time to think about whether the system is real or fake.

    3. Re:It will sell by mlts · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Even if a "good" security system works, it still leaves a broken window, a trashed door, or other damage done by a burglar. I had a vehicle protected with a kill switch rather than a car alarm because I didn't care for the siren noise. It got broken into several times and the steering column opened up. My vehicle was still there when I came back, but it cost a pretty penny to get the broken window fixed, a new ignition switch, etc.

      A real security system needs both. Real security that slows down or stops attacks combined with the "oh shit", brown-stain-in-pants, intimidation factor.

      It also depends on the criminal. The two barking GSDs in the window may deter a professional thief who makes his money on doing his stuff quietly, but the meth-head will just fire off a few rounds with his 9mm, and score something to take to a fence for another bottle of shake-and-bake.

      Personally, I'd take the laser system. Combined with a real alarm and in-depth security like sturdy, locking hall and bedroom doors, it will keep a good number of potential burglars at bay.

    4. Re:It will sell by Spy+Handler · · Score: 5, Informative

      NRA stickers are a bad idea. Most break-ins occur when the burglar is reasonably sure that nobody's home. All the sticker does is advertise that there are guns here just waiting to be stolen.

      BTW firearms rank right up there with cash and jewelry among desirable things to be stolen.

    5. Re:It will sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why didn't you tell Henry Kissinger that 'deterrence' has a limited scope? Did you believe it would make him M.A.D.?

      Is this why the Israeli's felt compelled be the first ones on their block to install nuclear weapons?

      If it's true that when all you have is a hammer, everything begins to look like a nail, then what does everything look like when you depend on subterfuge, high tech weaponry and derivative financial instruments, a Wallersteinian world?

    6. Re:It will sell by game+kid · · Score: 2

      That's why I prefer witches over guns.* It's hard for them to steal your weapon when your weapon has its own arcane shield and great brea^Wstaves and spells to deal heavy damage.

      *Witches with guns do complicate the risk calculation a bit.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    7. Re:It will sell by westlake · · Score: 1

      Criminals are usually no bright enough to figure out which threats are real or imagined

      Would anyone here know which high or low threats are real or imagined?

      What happens when you disrupt the pattern, break the beam -- infrared or visible light? Is there a gun? Is there a dog?

      Make my day. Prove me wrong.

    8. Re:It will sell by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Every house on my block was broken into in the 23 years I lived on one house, aside from mine. Hint:

      Buy the worst house in a nice neighborhood. Keep it up so it looks like you never hire anyone to care for it, but it looks lived in. The house directly across the street was inhabited by two wealthy retirees who had yard people (and nothing but old lady crap inside), they got hit 3 times in one year. But we had reasonable insides, but the worst exterior, never broken into. We didn't even lock our doors.

    9. Re:It will sell by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Even if a "good" security system works, it still leaves a broken window, a trashed door, or other damage done by a burglar. I had a vehicle protected with a kill switch rather than a car alarm because I didn't care for the siren noise. It got broken into several times and the steering column opened up. My vehicle was still there when I came back, but it cost a pretty penny to get the broken window fixed, a new ignition switch, etc.

      A real security system needs both. Real security that slows down or stops attacks combined with the "oh shit", brown-stain-in-pants, intimidation factor.

      It also depends on the criminal. The two barking GSDs in the window may deter a professional thief who makes his money on doing his stuff quietly, but the meth-head will just fire off a few rounds with his 9mm, and score something to take to a fence for another bottle of shake-and-bake.

      Personally, I'd take the laser system. Combined with a real alarm and in-depth security like sturdy, locking hall and bedroom doors, it will keep a good number of potential burglars at bay.

      A "real security system" is impossible.
      A 99.999% effective security solution is to put a box in the passenger seat that says "LIVE BEES".

    10. Re:It will sell by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      There were a series of home invasions in Anchorage 5 years ago. They targeted homes with guns. The only thing stolen was the guns. And they did so as home invasions, targeting when people were home. They didn't look for NRA stickers, but instead looked for people talking guns in high school, then talked them up about the types and kinds, then home-invaded later.

      You are more likely to get shot with your own gun by a home invader than successfully use one against a home invader (given FBI numbers defining a "success" as a hit, if you use the gun-nut numbers, there are millions of incidences of people brandishing guns and running off robbers and home invaders, but no numbers supporting that theory since the government is out to get them).

    11. Re:It will sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      you failed to mention that you were the thief

    12. Re:It will sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the diarrhea shit I took the other day is smarter than you. Probably more attractive too.

    13. Re:It will sell by JeffAtl · · Score: 2

      Those stats aren't really accurate but it's not worth debating. Like you said yourself, "a hit" is not the only measure of "success".

      In any event, no-knock warrants have made defending your home with a firearm almost impossible. Alll a intruder has to do is break in at 2AM and yell "this is the police!!! everyone on the ground now!". Cops get the wrong addresses all the time and if you shoot one because you think he is a home invader, you will be charged with murder.

    14. Re:It will sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Criminals (at least the good ones who aren't in jail after their first go) are extremely risk-averse. It's smart to do so, when you're in an already too-risky profession. You don't take on extra risks unless absolutely necessary. The idea that an intelligent crook would stand around trying to figure out if the laser-light show was backed by a real security system or not is silly.

    15. Re:It will sell by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Has anyone ever been successfully prosecuted for shooting the police in a no knock raid? I see lots of "ifs" out there when I look, but otherwise, as far as I can tell, nobody has ever been prosecuted for shooting a police officer performing a no knock raid.

      But the best defense for that is very very bright lights on a motion sensor. They'll scare away anyone at night. Though the home invasions to grab guns were during the day (well, sun-up evening, anyway).

    16. Re:It will sell by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Depends how desperate they are. If you're the only house around for 10 miles, and they really need something, Ft. Knox itself would be sieged.

      And remember, despite their poor moral / lifestyle choices, they are anything but stupid. The kids at Mensa can't hold a thimble to what some of the things these people think of. Military veterans can't compare to some of the truly terrible situations these people find themselves in, and yet still come out alive.

      And the funny part is, the utter simplicity of how they pull it off. That one blind spot you were unaware of, that given you and everyone else take for granted...it's like watching a street magician, and then having the trick explained to you. How did that burglar get into that apartment? Thousands of theories were put forth, but in the end, he climbed up there, and opened the sliding door. Climbed several stories, from one outcropping to the other. Simple, effective.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    17. Re:It will sell by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Or you could be a real psychopath, and purposefully sit home alone, at night, with all the lights off, and a loaded gun in your hands, waiting for someone to break in.

      There's dangerous, and then there's dangerous.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    18. Re:It will sell by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Criminals (at least the good ones who aren't in jail after their first go) are extremely risk-averse. It's smart to do so, when you're in an already too-risky profession. You don't take on extra risks unless absolutely necessary. The idea that an intelligent crook would stand around trying to figure out if the laser-light show was backed by a real security system or not is silly.

      They let some dumb juvenile take the risk. Their contribution is in transportation to the job site and the den mother function.

    19. Re:It will sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Claymore sticker?

    20. Re:It will sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i do that every night! great fun, beats doing anything else

    21. Re:It will sell by RevDisk · · Score: 1

      No, motion lights are not a great deterrent.

      I walked onto my porch while a crackhead was trying to steal my car stereo from my car. Motion lights were on. They are handy for providing light when something is moving. No more, no less. Now, it WAS very handy to be able to clearly see the person so I could identify him in a police lineup.

    22. Re:It will sell by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

      You are more likely to get shot with your own gun by a home invader than successfully use one against a home invader

      That may well be true. And you (as a hypothetical average citizen) likely cannot locate China on a map or know how to defrag a hard disk. However, given an individual with the right knowledge and training, the odds change drastically.

    23. Re:It will sell by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      You are more likely to get shot with your own gun by a home invader than successfully use one against a home invader (given FBI numbers defining a "success" as a hit, if you use the gun-nut numbers, there are millions of incidences of people brandishing guns and running off robbers and home invaders, but no numbers supporting that theory since the government is out to get them).

      I dunno what the government has to do with it, but Gary Kleck has been studying and documenting such cases for decades now - see Gary_Kleck for more info + cites and criticisms. BTW, Kleck is a self described liberal Democratic, is not an NRA member, and was a gun control supporter before conducting his studies. Hardly fits the image of a 'gun nut'.

    24. Re:It will sell by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Crackheads aren't rational. He should have run from the light under the expectation that you'd be coming and result in his arrest.

    25. Re:It will sell by umghhh · · Score: 1

      One can reason that an intelligent criminal would research potential targets and your house is probably not on the list and if it were the criminal would investigate ways to disable the protection systems before going to work. The less intelligent ones would see the lights and seek their luck elsewhere because small chance that they are mistaken about 'fake' system is coupled with huge inconveniences of taking a shower in prison. So no the argument about silly criminals is probably wrong. as the only ones you have to protect against are the /.ers because when they see it they 'know' it is a fake ...

    26. Re:It will sell by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      Wish I had mod points, 'cuz you said a lot in not many words.

  9. the more security the more to steal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If I saw a house with a laser security system I would immediately think "what the hell are they trying to keep hold of that's so important they need a super fancy laser security system to protect..."

    1. Re:the more security the more to steal by nedlohs · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And if you were a super criminal that would matter. If, however, you are just out to grab some stuff to sell in order to by some crack then you'll just move onto the next place.

    2. Re:the more security the more to steal by reub2000 · · Score: 1

      I don't think they're selling this to protect homes. The video linked to shows a bike shop. Kind of obvious what valuables they have even without some show-off security system.

  10. home security.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When I was researching home security, I often stumble upon the "fact" that the biggest deterrent are alarm signs and having a barking dog (regardless of size - it doesn't even have to be aggressive). The last thing a thief needs is attention. If that fails and the intruder gets in (and assuming you have neighbors within an earshot), the loud alarm sound will make them panic, or at least make them rush through things and make mistakes.

    Lastly, if you do have a genuine alarm, which I think it's useless, the operator will first call you to confirm intrusion BEFORE contacting the police. Even after the police is called, they consider it low priority unless there's a person in the house with the potential of the situation escalating to you becoming a hostage. But anyways, it will be 30 minutes before the police arrives at your location. This has happened 3 times at my dad's business where it was burglarized. The cops were pretty much useless and honestly && realistically, by the time the security company calls the cops, the thieves are already long gone. Why does my dad have it? For insurance reasons.

    For my house, i just put up signs and stickers, and have a honeywell system setup that directly dials my cell phone. It works because I rarely use my landline, and on my cell caller ID, i renamed it to "HOME INVASION". Security system operators are largely useless, especially for home.

    1. Re:home security.. by rudy_wayne · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's all fun and games until your cat dies of exhaustion.

    2. Re:home security.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A decent home security system will have two armed settings - Home and Away. If the alarm is triggered and it was set to Away the operator doesn't call the house first, just gets the police.

    3. Re:home security.. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Just wire up a speaker so you can call up and say "hello? Who's there? Hey you, stop right there!"

    4. Re:home security.. by rk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or just a high quality sample of a pump-action shotgun getting cycled, which is the international signal for "you're in a whole heap 'o trouble, son!" :-)

    5. Re:home security.. by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      Hack up you 'big mouth billy bass' to make the pumping shotgun noise. Brown stains leading out of house.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    6. Re:home security.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn cat eats 15 cans of tuna a day, and all I see him do while I'm around is sleep!!!

    7. Re:home security.. by Huge_UID · · Score: 2
      I'll help you with the attribution. From Schneier's blog:

      It's all fun and games until your cat dies of exhaustion. Posted by: Kahomono at August 17, 2012 7:18 AM

    8. Re:home security.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With Hydra Control Freak, (http://www.hydracontrolfreak.com) you can be watching video of the event trigger within 5 seconds of the intruder triggering your outdoor sensors. Then one button click triggers the real world deterants and SMS's, E-mails, gateways whoever you have setup in advance. That's what you want, scare the guy off if you can within 20 seconds of them entering your property. Then call the cops with a confirmed intrusion.

  11. Screws over the people with real alarms by JoshuaZ · · Score: 1

    Part of the problem with this sort of thing isn't just that it only works when it isn't widely known. Even if it is only marginally known, it will make criminals take security systems (even real ones) less seriously because they know there's a decent chance the system is fake. Since there's evidence that criminals already have poorer impulse control and less are less risk averse than the general population http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/294626-overview, http://jnnp.bmj.com/content/71/6/720.full, http://web.utk.edu/~wneilson/EcLett-Crime.pdf, this is likely to make them more likely to break in general. This will make alarm systems be less effective deterrents. Essentially this is very close to defecting in the n-player version of the prisoner's dilemma.

    Even if it does deter people, it could easily lead to more and more intimidation required to get criminals to take the threat seriously, which could lead to an arms race of ridiculous looking security measures. Overall, this seems socially irresponsible.

    1. Re:Screws over the people with real alarms by eyenot · · Score: 1

      ONLY if the deterrents in use in your dichotomy are false deterrents.

      Consider this: the thieves now throw themselves headlong into security systems believing they might be false; the thieves are caught mid-act by effective, real, actual, working, again: effective security systems; the thieves are fucked (caught).

      This might be a possible scenario where broadcasting the existence of the tar-baby or fake intruder countermeasure results in heightened effectiveness of existing effective countermeasures simply because: more people plunge into them based on the probability of those countermeasures being ineffective based on some crazy stunt-kit that copycats actual security.

      Do you understand what I'm saying? People are dynamic.

      Many thieves look at cameras and actually judge for themselves whether those cameras are the real thing or are fake cameras put up to ward off thieves.

      The idiots waltz right through attempted thievery and are caught because, indeed, the cameras were real but the thieves acted as if they might not be. It happens frequently.

      Despite what some may say, fake security DOES impede real crime, and obfuscation DOES impede real attempts to decrypt.

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    2. Re:Screws over the people with real alarms by eyenot · · Score: 1

      Alroight. final argument:

      Consider where G O D used to stand in for security AND technology, both similar.

      Consider if you told tales about security technology.

      Consider how effective you'd be while admiring the eventual growth rate and power structure of something like the vatican, the muslim world, and the hindu/buddhist structure, all combined.

      Tell me you don't think a little make-believe, a little lying, are effective means of creating a world where nobody is sure what to believe, but people learn methods of "faith" (trust-based security) to defeat the overwhelming tides of the "devil" (the ever-present threat of falsehood, including the epitomy of falsehood -- malware).

      TECHNOSHAMANISM is at hand! Embrace it! Lie! Cheat! Steal! Corrupt! Take your spoils, as I will take mine, for from an early time I know we all have earned them, not as they were plucked like teeth from the mouth of a poor young man but as they were the feathers of the phoenix taken from the dwindling fires of an early age almost squashed by hegemony and greed!

      Take up the knowledge that obfuscation DOES offer some security, and use it as a springboard to collapse those systems that attempt to squelch your security through incorporate frustration and under-thought malfeasance.

      Why have we not shown this world a thing or two, already? Who are we? Always under-paid, under-laid, under-privilege bastard sons of stupid bitches, or are we decent enough company to take under the wings of even the highest eagles?

      Break a few more bangles, and urge a few more charms, and I'm sure that the "nerd" culture might even win a few favors where, for now, it stands like a reedy moss in a thicket of water and shit, soaking up detritus and proving for itself nothing but its own respiration.

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    3. Re:Screws over the people with real alarms by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I have faith healed computers and cars for credulous people. In both cases I reattached a lose connector while distracting them with the hocus pocus.

      Nobody bought it, they knew I'm a heathen.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:Screws over the people with real alarms by eyenot · · Score: 1

      Gladly, so, you make my point. Well met, brother of brethren.

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    5. Re:Screws over the people with real alarms by eyenot · · Score: 1

      *Shrug* You intended to perform for your audience the rite of acknowledgement into the echelon of true believers. So what if you failed to let them know what it took to be really there? You did all humankind a favor by demonstrating, with your performance, that puppetry and cascades of wonder have no match for the actual imposition of securely obtained and restrained measures upon every least facet of throughput.

      So, you mayest show that the simplest coward is but a simpleton, but, where were you, when all of us crowed for a simpleton bemoaned, who was yet a well-disciplined ward to clean the paths ahead of all us the rest?

      I don't think you really do care -- I know I do, and I can tell, you do not.

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    6. Re:Screws over the people with real alarms by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I drive the demons from eyenot's mind with the power of my third nostril. Does it smell eyenot? Cause I just farted. Smells like brimstone.

      Let go of eyenot's vas dark creatures. He needs metaphysical crab medication. They're in your scrotum eyenot, cut it open with a butter knife and insert a jagged piece of urinal mint.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re:Screws over the people with real alarms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG are that 'a fictional account' guy that use to do parodys of peoples post BITD?

  12. prepare for incoming lawsuit by Trepidity · · Score: 2

    By publicizing this system even after well-known security expert Bruce Schneier "highlights that the product only works if the product isn't very widely known", Slashdot is clearly guilty of attempting to aid and abet burglars. Cybercrime charges for samzenpus!

  13. Wow there must be some valuable stuff in there! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Lets nock out the power and take it.

    1. Re:Wow there must be some valuable stuff in there! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every Security system I've ever seen is battery backed up. Most of the good ones I saw in the 90s even had ways to connect cellphones so that you could have it remote dial if the phone lines were taken out as well.

    2. Re:Wow there must be some valuable stuff in there! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Cutting power will immediately set off my home alarm. As will cutting the phone line. Battery backed up celular in case outside power and phone are cut. If you break in with a real system, you might get inside before it goes off. With mine, the alarm would be activated before you ever made it inside, increasing your chance of being caught. Cutting power almost never works. You aren't smarter than everyone who has ever worked security combined. They've already thought of this.

  14. Really old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having fake security systems is almost as old as real security systems.

    Why was this one reported on?

    1. Re:Really old news by webmistressrachel · · Score: 1

      Lasers, my friend, lasers.

      Slashdot can't resist any bit of news or new product that might even hint at lasers. Throw sharks into the mix if you can and PROFIT!

      --
      This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
  15. Fear of sharks :P by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Where there are lasers, the sharks aren't far behind.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  16. A friendly voice informs thief by Grayhand · · Score: 1

    "Greeting, my laser targeted guns have locked onto you and will fire in ten seconds. Would you like me to inform your next of kin?"

    1. Re:A friendly voice informs thief by canadiannomad · · Score: 1

      I've had exactly the same idea :D Don't need the actual guns... Just a system of 5 or 6 laser pointers that hone in on the center of a heat source(programmed to avoid known sources) and a loud commanding voice letting the intruder know "This is a heartless, automatic shooting machine, and we have a lock on you. Leave. NOW" And maybe a system that imitates ricochet and let them know that those were warning shots :)

      --
      Hmm, the humour and sarcasm seem to have been be lost on you.
  17. It's all fun and games... by splitsevin · · Score: 1, Funny

    until your cat dies of exhaustion.

    --
    The enemy of my enemy is quite possibly also my enemy. I've made a lot of enemies.
    1. Re:It's all fun and games... by eyenot · · Score: 1

      blah-hah... would mod funny

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    2. Re:It's all fun and games... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  18. apply this same mentality, everywhere. by eyenot · · Score: 1

    I came up with a pretty distinct statement about this concept.

    ""There's no security in obfuscation" cannot be a positively true statement. Comparatively, there is absolutely *no* security in full disclosure or revelation, whereas in obfuscation there is *enough* security that many people resort to it in an attempt to secure things, typically because it's just *enough* to fool people."

    You can read it at my professional (not my funny friendly one) gabe.petrie at facebook.

    --
    "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
  19. Security theatre isn't useless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Let's put aside the psychological arguments, the publicity arguments, and who-knows-what-else, and concentrate on one specific point:

    MANY ATTACKERS ARE FUCKING RETARDED.

    A little bluffing at the front door can shake off lots of people who don't read Slashdot, or Scheier, or even Popular Mechanics for that matter. If your primary threat comes from a foreign intelligency agency, this probably won't do crap for you. If your primary threat comes from metal theiving tweekers, then that's an entirely different story. But there's another closely related point here too:

    MANY OF YOUR NEIGHBORS ARE ALSO FUCKING RETARDED.

    Or to put it another way... if you and your friend are hiking in the woods and you run across a grizzly bear, you don't need to outrun the bear. You just need to outrun your friend. A little security theatre might be just the trick if the bozo next door looks like a softer target than you.

  20. This is a better fake security by andydread · · Score: 1
  21. Bruce underestimates the unconscious mind by doug141 · · Score: 1

    People in an honor system breakroom pay more when there's a picture of eyes on the wall. Unconscious mind at work. Here's a link to discussion of the study. http://thinkingmeat.com/newsblog/?m=200606

  22. It doesnt make it reality by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    It boils down to a simple fact, crooks prefer easy targets. If you appear to be more work than the guy next door, he will move on unless he wants YOU. Then nothing will stop him and will just laugh at your fake system that didn't magically become 'real'..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  23. don't rob me signs by manaway · · Score: 1

    Some thieves target cars with NRA stickers because there are often guns inside. Easy money. So maybe place the sticker on your house instead of your pickup. I don't know how bright criminals are compared to the typical person, but I suspect as more people go unemployed and increasingly desperate, the criminal IQ will approach the national average.

    1. Re:don't rob me signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's all judgement and experience, not intelligence.

  24. This could work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if they did something like this. If the customer wants to be cheap, they can just get the lightshow and loud noises. If they want real protection, that light show and loud noises tie into an actual system. That way the thief would have a harder time knowing if police were alerted or not.

  25. My sticker would say: by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    This system could be real, or it could be fake... You gotta ask yourself one question: Do I feel lucky?....Well, do ya, punk?

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  26. visual laser systems are a movie thing by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    visual laser systems are a movie thing the real ones are IR ones.

  27. Which is why you have... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Or they'd just say "fuck it", walk into the place in broad daylight wearing a ski mask and carrying a rifle, grab what he wants.

    That's why you keepold ladies with guns running the place.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  28. Ah, the laser field. Well..... by Israfels · · Score: 1
  29. Interview with a career burglar by Monkier · · Score: 1

    I remember seeing some documentary interview with a career break & enter guy. He said he learned pretty quick to rob rich neighbourhoods; they had much better stuff to steal. The interviewer asked if he was worried about house alarms, and he said that the vast majority of houses he robbed had alarms not switched on or otherwise inoperable. He'd just try break in, if he didn't hear a siren he'd be in and out in a few minutes.

  30. Perception is everything. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    A long time ago I had a dog that had bonked her head a few times running into the sliding-glass door. Eventually, I could fool her by pretending to shut the door and she would just stand there until I pretended to open it. Dogs are fun.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  31. That means it will work by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 4, Informative

    I bought a fake "security camera" for $12, just has a blinking red LED, no other real electronics... and mounted it on a pole peeking above my fence on our dead end.

    Instant effects. No more people parking to have sex or eat McDonald's and throw the trash on my lawn, no more people stealing flowers or attempting to hide in my property, even the neighbors are paranoid about the "surveillance."

    Most people don't understand the difference between their web browser and the file manager.

    Unless you're in a very rich neighborhood which attracts high-end catburglars out of the movies, the presence of a few strange boxes with red lights is more than enough to make them go away.

    --
    This space available.
    1. Re:That means it will work by magic+maverick+ · · Score: 1

      > Most people don't understand the difference between their web browser and the file manager.

      Possibly because MS for many years tried hard to make sure that the two were about the same. Seriously, open up file manager in MS Windows (up until at least Windows Server 2003 with MS IE 6, no experience with anything later), and type in a web URL. That same window will turn into MS IE! Alternatively, you can type a local file address (c:\windows\ or c:\windows\notepad.exe or whatever), and that will open.

      Also, KDE, last time I used KDE (2003 or there abouts I think), did the same thing!

      --
      HELP MY ACCOUNT HAS BEEN HACKED BY AN ILLIBERAL ART STUDENT SET TO DESTROY THE INTERWEBZ!
    2. Re:That means it will work by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      I could have expressed what I meant better. What I mean is, most people don't know the difference between a screen showing them the contents of their hard drive and a screen showing them a website, or a screen from an app like flickr uploader. I've had people ask me if Word opens slowly because the internet speed is slowed...

      --
      This space available.
    3. Re:That means it will work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > difference between a screen showing them the contents of their hard drive and a screen showing them a website

      Maybe it's the contents of the website's hard drive?

      > Word opens slowly because the internet speed is slowed

      Slowed down because Word has to check for updates over the internet?

    4. Re:That means it will work by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      Naw, in this case it's just not knowing the difference between downloading data from the net and opening a file on the harddrive.

      --
      This space available.
  32. It's a must have by ozduo · · Score: 0

    to practice the acrobatics and gymnastic moves.

    --
    I got to the chocolate box before you, that's why the hard ones have teeth marks.
    1. Re:It's a must have by crutchy · · Score: 1

      only if you have big tits

  33. Kill the dragon and save both of you by tepples · · Score: 1

    If you and a halfling are being chased by a dragon ...

    ...whip out your crossbow and attack its weak point. A dragon sleeps on a bed of pieces of soft metal because it isn't flammable (The Flight of Dragons). Some of this metal ends up embedding itself into the dragon's skin, where it acts as armor. But even old dragons that have metal fragments embedded in nearly their entire bellies are usually vulnerable in a couple parts (The Hobbit). So aim for the part of the underbelly that isn't metal-encrusted, or if you can't find that, aim for the eye.

    1. Re:Kill the dragon and save both of you by Amouth · · Score: 1

      the SR GM's i've had hated me for that, always the eyes, blind the boss and the can't too too much more, eventually i got my soul slapped out of me

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    2. Re:Kill the dragon and save both of you by madhi19 · · Score: 1

      You're shit out of luck because before you could grab the halfling he likely put on his magic ring! Those damn halfling burglar can't be trusted you know!

  34. Fastball special by tepples · · Score: 1

    you can pick the halfling up and toss him towards the dragon's mouth. Which I have actually done before playing role playing games.

    Yeah, the technique is called a fastball special. Find someone small who's good with a weapon, and attack the dragon's weak point that way. Just be dang sure you can make the catch.

    1. Re:Fastball special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Find someone small who's good with a weapon, and attack the dragon's weak point for massive damage.

      FTFY

  35. Laser pointers taped to ceiling fan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cheaper solution

  36. Silly, life is not a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As somebody who went to school with a convicted murderer... I was not surprised when he went to jail because some cop pushed his buttons on the wrong day and he beat the cop to death with his hands! Then years later he was convicted (somewhat meaninglessly) of murdering a whole family with children execution style - Why? He was robbing their house and didn't care that they were home asleep but his partner mentioned his first name while in the house so he had to find and kill everybody in the house just in case.

    This was a guy who'd punch you in the face and probably beat you to death if somebody didn't intervene-- as a kid. He was pre-emptive and would attack somebody before they could attack him. I'm sure his gun was out and simply seeing you or hearing you in any possibly threatening way he'd shoot 1st and hesitate later. Most people give you some warning or indication or hesitate-- a hardened criminal or some fucked up person will NOT.

    The sound of a shotgun pumping is going to get you shot before you can pull the trigger-- and being a normal person you'll hesitate even if you do not think you would (you are lying to yourself; seriously, you'd shoot a friend or relative who needs to crash at your house? A family member? No, of course not because you'll talk right-- well that IS hesitation!)

    I had an ex-con friend in college and the stories he learned in there really should wake people up -- sure the ones caught are dumb (or are in there for just doing drugs... which maybe is dumb; debatable.)

  37. Crimson Trace by lee+n.+field · · Score: 1

    but it displays "one hell of a laser show in an attempt to scare potential crooks into thinking that they have no chance of breaking in without triggering the alarm.

    Hmm. I'm thinking something from Crimson Trace or one of its many competitors might be better for this.

  38. Your snarkiness is weak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see a lot of jackasses making snide and smug sounding comments on here followed by a "LOL!" when infact they arent thinking things through. This isnt meant to protect to pentagon you tards, its for a regular persons home. No real thief is going to break into a house to steal your dvd collection and beer. Thieves that just break into normal peoples homes arent very bright. Anyone that has the brains to research something like this and knows the difference between real security and fake security wont be breaking into someones 85,000 dollar home.

    Making your armchair professional opinion on here is to everyone else as insightful and humorous as having a guy at the special olympics make fun of them for not setting world records.

    1. Re:Your snarkiness is weak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think it's more for exactly the situation that the inventor had. A shop where the windows is right onto the street where people walk by all the time. If you are talking about a person's home where there are areas where intruders are not normally expected to be, then there are better solutions where the owners is *actually* alerted before the breakin, like the hydra control freak.

  39. Don't worry it will still work. by beltsbear · · Score: 4, Funny

    Most of the criminals to be deterred are not reading slashdot. If they are a criminal reading slashdot they are too busy using their Arduinos to open hotel doors.

    1. Re:Don't worry it will still work. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It might deter opportunistic criminals but it is also a giant flashing laser-show advertisement for stuff worth stealing.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Don't worry it will still work. by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      It might deter opportunistic criminals but it is also a giant flashing laser-show advertisement for stuff worth stealing.

      They will steal the security system.

  40. What about adding a 'real' version to the line. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Adding a real version of the system could make the potential of the system being real a deterrent. Maybe an agreement with brinks or such could alleviate the back end required.

  41. The key is commitment by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I drilled a hole in my dash to mount the red light and hid the switch out of sight under the dash. Your solution sounds a little too ghetto to work, since you could easily tell something was up... a red light in the dash looks more "legit".

    Sorry about the car though, that sucks far worse than just being broken into...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:The key is commitment by crutchy · · Score: 1

      yeah i bet he was fond of that led blinker

      some bastard stole my bird bath... i loved that thing

  42. Dunno about the eye... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    That eye is sure a lot smaller than the womp rats I used to nail from my T-16 back home. Not sure I can hit it.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  43. You know it's a serious alarm system ... by Meetch · · Score: 0

    ... when the laser's mounted on a Frickin' shark's head.

  44. Post ipo products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The products of a typical company cease function after the warranty period is over. Global Link Security Solutions is among the rare breed of companies whose products stop working after the IPO.

  45. Proactive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The proactive approach is definiately the way forward. But you want a proactive system that actually alerts the owner, like Hydra Control Freak

    http://www.hydracontrolfreak.com/

  46. Result... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The security system will be ripped off.

  47. Yawn by sjames · · Score: 1

    I'm holding out for the holographic projector that makes the crooks think there are sharks with frickin lasers on their heads swimming in the living room.

    1. Re:Yawn by crutchy · · Score: 1

      or darth vader

  48. Not widely known by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    Pretty much any security products only work if they're not well known... Once something becomes well known, people will research efficient methods of circumvention and soon that knowledge will become widespread.

    Of course, this runs against the goal of any business trying to sell such a product, since they want it to become as widespread as possible in order to sell as much as they can.

    Even a security system that calls the police is not flawless, if its over sensitive (or a criminal can trigger a false alarm easily without breaking in) and not an exceptionally high value target, then the police will soon get sick of coming out and start ignoring the alarms. Similarly, the police response time gives you a window of opportunity in which to commit your crime.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    1. Re:Not widely known by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      That's why I hide a pungee stick pit under my front door mat. It's more effective than using keys.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  49. erm... by crutchy · · Score: 1

    looks pretty complicated... how much harder would it be to actually use the lasers to detect a break in?

    in any case, I WANT ONE!!!

  50. Sounds interesting by Wouter+Van+Hemel · · Score: 1

    Sounds great... I'd love to break into a house like that!

  51. Good idea, failed execution. by Havenwar · · Score: 1

    The point with this kind of security is to look like a harder target than the guy next to you. But if you look like you take security REALLY seriously in a neighbourhood of people who are more normal, then all of a sudden you've painted a bullseye on yourself instead. Then you'd attract the kind of criminal who would be smart enough to walk by one night and throw a newspaper through the lasers on their way past, and notice the significant lack of any reaction.

    So basically if you're living in a normal neighbourhood, you'd need something LESS FLASHY. And if you live in a neighbourhood where this kind of thing is standard, then you'd need something that looked even flashier. But then if you live in a neighbourhood where this kind of thing is standard, you probably need and can afford the real deal.

    1. Re:Good idea, failed execution. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      It's not "flashy vs. not flashy" it's "make yourself look like the least appealing target".

      The common thief won't think anything of a 386 sitting in the corner, it's old junk. They'll grab the $500 40" TV instead. What if it's not a 386 and is, in fact, a valuables safe containing tens of thousands in whatever?

      They'll hit your neighbor who has the BMW sitting out on his drive and a nicely manicured lawn long before they hit the grandmother in the unmaintained yard across the street - who just happens to have tens of thousands in gold coins on display (but not visible from the street) over the mantle.

      The best trick I've seen was when someone living on my family's culdesac at the end got broken into several times one summer. He bought an old Crown Vic at auction, screwed a fake spot light onto the side, and put a random number generator-controlled green LED and resistor setup. He had a servo which would pull a string randomly on a black-clad dummy sitting in the driver's seat and make it move. He parked the car behind some trees on the edge of his property. From even a couple feet away, it looked fairly authentic. No other problems after that. I've also seen people intentionally obscure their house from the street so they can't be easily cased.

      Having someone home all the time, having a fairly random schedule, and/or generally making it difficult for thieves to tell when you are up and/or awake certainly helps as a deterrent for the professional thief.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    2. Re:Good idea, failed execution. by Havenwar · · Score: 1

      Exactly my point, this system makes you look like a higher value target. The lower level crooks might pass you by, but the higher levels won't - and if you use this system around a regular neighbourhood you'll stick out like a sore thumb, making it all the more obvious.

      As for good home security, home automation is pretty nice, and an amusing geeky project. Use those radio controlled outlets or something similar, control the whole thing from some project board like an arduino or such, and you can go on vacation knowing that your home will still look somewhat lived in, lights turning on and off during the right times (but randomly, according to whatever pattern matches your routines best) and so on. I saw a guy who had electric shades in his windows, they could be controlled manually or go up and down automatically as the sun shifted across the sky. When he went on vacation his home automation system automatically shut the shades in his bedroom for an hour in the afternoon every day or two, since that's what he usually did when he was home for the afternoon and having a nap.

      I think looking like someone is still at home is a lot more valuable security wise than a laser show... but then if I bought that laser show system it would be the most expensive item I owned, so I have a feeling it would be the first thing they nicked.

  52. It's not a security system by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    They don't even advertise it as a security system. They advertise it as a deterrent. It is indicated for use with an existing security system as a visual deterrent.

    Nothing to be pissed about here. Move along.

  53. My cats would love this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if only they were dots and not the wide beam style. Just think, they would rebrand this as a $250 cat toy!

    ADT, why you no have a laser module like this? I would love a laser show to add to my system, especially if they made it wireless and only active on the away mode. Better yet, if you could add motion sensors to the outside of your house to turn on the lasers it, you could have it only activate when someone is coming to look.

  54. My Door by Westwood0720 · · Score: 1

    I saved the target from when I went to the range and hung up a sign saying "I DON'T DIAL 911" on my front door. No break ins so far. =D

  55. Real Burglars will know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is akin to the notion that if you are walking care free with money in a bag the muggers will ignore you.

  56. I like the sound of the laser show. by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

    Ooh... Laser shows are pretty. It might be even prettier with some flashing lights to top it off. Blue is a nice colour. =)