Slashdot Mirror


Survey Reveals a Majority Believe "the Cloud" Is Affected by Weather

SmartAboutThings writes "In a recent survey performed by Wakefield Research, it has been discovered that the majority of the surveyed Americans are quite confused about the notion of Cloud, when it relates to Cloud Storage/Computing. The most interesting fact is that 51% of the surveyed persons thought that stormy weather interferes with cloud computing!"

80 of 261 comments (clear)

  1. It does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    When that stormy weather takes out power supplies to the data centres.

    1. Re:It does by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A friend of mine transfered his VM instances out of New Orleans datacenters yesterday.

    2. Re:It does by slashmydots · · Score: 2

      Oh come on. That's almost as stupid as saying that February 29th destroys clouds...oh wait.

  2. It isn't? by Daetrin · · Score: 4, Informative

    Didn't we have a story in the last couple weeks about Amazon's cloud servers getting taken out by a large storm and the resulting power outage or something like that?

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    1. Re:It isn't? by Daetrin · · Score: 5, Informative

      Okay, found the link: http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/12/06/30/162250/more-uptime-problems-for-amazon-cloud

      "An Amazon Web Services data center in northern Virginia lost power Friday night during an electrical storm, causing downtime for numerous customers â" including Netflix"

      So the east coast has a big storm, power goes out, and the cloud goes down, and somehow people are drawing the conclusion that stormy weather can have an adverse effect on the cloud? It's possible they're confused about how big a storm is required, the article doesn't address that point, but clearly the idea isn't crazy.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    2. Re:It isn't? by sjames · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes. The people who believe storms may disrupt cloud computing are 100% correct. Not only can they, but there is a history of it.

      As for not knowing what the cloud is, I'd argue that they're in the same boat as marketing and the media that pumps out the breathless cloud stories 24/7.

    3. Re:It isn't? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly... I'm more worried about the ones who think cloud computing is NOT impacted by weather. If some random person walked up to me on the street and asked me this, I'd say, "sure, it can", and I'm quite technical.

      This seems much like the hand-writing shocked headlines announcing that most Americans think humans and dinosaurs existed at the same time... the only problem being that we DID exist at the same time. Paleontologists consider modern birds to be dinosaurs, so most people are quite correct.

      Paleontologists regard birds as the only clade of dinosaurs to have survived the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event 65.5 Ma ago> .

      In both cases, this shows that most people are not as dumb as the ones giving the survey.

    4. Re:It isn't? by mrmeval · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't trust the clowd clowns with your data!

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    5. Re:It isn't? by ldobehardcore · · Score: 2

      I'd say a large part of America simultaneously believes birds aren't dinosaurs, and that birds didn't evolve from them, since they feel in their gut that life as we know it today is the exact same as it was when created by god 6000 years ago when the earth wasn't around, but the ocean was.

      --
      Hectice, baby, Mercator says hello to you
    6. Re:It isn't? by SomeJoel · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't trust the clowd clowns with your data!

      I certainly won't. Thanks for the tip. One other thing, how do I distinguish clowd clowns from regular clowns?

      --
      <Complete your profile by adding a signature!>
    7. Re:It isn't? by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      Yes but in the second instance, the correct follow up would be, "Do you think birds are dinosaurs", and if a majority answered no, than the original implication of ignorance on a large part of America would be correct.

      Birds are not dinosaurs, any more than humans are single cell protozoans. If you truly believe in macroevolution, of the kind that can create new species and animals from existing ones, then you must believe that things CHANGE over time. That is, they aren't the same anymore. You must answer "no" to that question if you are to be honest.

      And if you don't believe in macroevolution, just microevolution (the kind that causes birds to develop different beaks to deal with different environments, but they are still birds), then you will still say "no".

      And, of course, a creationist will say "no", as well.

      Your question does nothing to differentiate between what you are obviously trying to imply about the ignorance or lack thereof of a person based on a belief or disbelief in evolution.

    8. Re:It isn't? by Eponymous+Hero · · Score: 4, Informative

      they don't eat little kids.

      --
      insensitive clod overlords obligatory xkcd car analogy russian reversals whoosh pedant fanbois ftfy in 3...2...1..PROFIT
    9. Re:It isn't? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 5, Informative

      Don't trust the clowd clowns with your data!

      I certainly won't. Thanks for the tip. One other thing, how do I distinguish clowd clowns from regular clowns?

      Can you really think of a situation that would require you to trust any kind of clown?

    10. Re:It isn't? by Obfuscant · · Score: 4, Funny

      Can you really think of a situation that would require you to trust any kind of clown?

      Eating at McDonalds?

    11. Re:It isn't? by digitig · · Score: 2

      Er -- perhaps you don't understand the meaning of "clade". Being in a clade of dinosaurs doesn't mean that they are dinosaurs. Humans will be in the clade of some ancient eukaryote, but that doesn't make us eukaryotes.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    12. Re:It isn't? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Elections?

    13. Re:It isn't? by danaris · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Can you really think of a situation that would require you to trust any kind of clown?

      Eating at McDonalds?

      And you think that's a good idea in the first place?

      Dan Aris

      --
      Fun. Free. Online. RPG. BattleMaster.
    14. Re:It isn't? by mrmeval · · Score: 4, Funny

      *headdesk* Dammit both are evil. Let me think.

      Ah

      Clown: promises you candy and sunshine and dishes out horror and pain.

      Clowd clown: promises you a magic sky bag where you can keep all your important stuff but it fails when it gets
      wet
      'too full'
      a warrant is issued
      they're having a bad hair day
      snorted to much meth
      spend the money you paid them on too many hookers
      forget to pay their electric bill
      can't pay their electric bill
      piss off the employees who didn't get any hookers or meth
      just don't like you anymore. ....

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    15. Re:It isn't? by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 2

      And once upon a time light was defined as a wave propagating through the lumiferous aether.

      The dictionary is not evidence of ANYTHING (other than what the people who wrote the dictionary decided to write down). Dictionaries are descriptive. If the understanding of a concept has changed, and/or the term is used differently now then it is the dictionary that is wrong.

    16. Re:It isn't? by schroedingers_hat · · Score: 2

      You are all arguing because traditional taxonomy is intensely stupid.
      There is a reasonably hard point at which we can define the distinction between two creatures: the last common ancestor.
      Yes it only works in hindsight.
      Yes it is still a bit fuzzy (many populations cross breed slightly whilst diverging).
      But it's a hell of a lot better than this stupidity.
      You just draw monophyletic boundaries, rather than 'I'm including this, but not that because I think it looks funny'. Subsets of subsets and suddenly the problem goes away.
      Renaming each group would help with the confusion, but personally I'm happy calling birds dinosaurs and calling both birds and humans bony fish. Draw the distinctions at what is fundamental (genes) rather than whatever some long dead biologist who didn't understand as much as we do thought.

    17. Re:It isn't? by Havenwar · · Score: 2

      That doesn't require trust, that requires suspension of disbelief.

    18. Re:It isn't? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Paleontologists regard birds as the only clade of dinosaurs to have survived the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event 65.5 Ma ago

      Methinks somebody didn't understand (nor look up) what the word clade means.

      Basically, a clade is a group consisting of a species (extinct or extant) and all its descendants.

      So the sentence "Paleontologists regard birds as the only clade of dinosaurs to have survived the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event 65.5 Ma ago." is just a fancy way of saying that birds are the only living things to have descended from dinosaurs (as opposed to also reptiles). Indeed, the reptile species living today are not descendant from the dinosaurs, but are different lineage. However the birds are.

  3. Weather does affect it by Nightlight3 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Recent outages of AWS and other providers demonstrate that weather does affect the "Cloud" platforms.

    1. Re:Weather does affect it by Dahamma · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, no, it sounds like it WAS a completely useless question. Most people did NOT realize what the question being asked was about.

      "54% of Americans do not know what the cloud is and claim to never have used it. ... also, another alarming number is that 51% of the surveyed Americans think that stormy weather can interfere with the functionality of the cloud."

      So, if 54% surveyed had never heard the term, and and almost identical 51% surveyed who don't know it refers to computing services over the Internet, then it doesn't mean people are stupid, just uninformed, and the second number means nothing (of course, the survey doesn't mention how these numbers overlap, which makes it all the more useless).

      And honestly, I would bet over 50% of those who BUILD network-based services that could be considered "in the Cloud" think the whole "Cloud" terminology is one of the stupidest things pseudo-technology journalists and marketers have foisted on the public in years. Based on the over-saturation of "the Cloud", I'm surprised everyone isn't starting to call the Internet "the Tubes"...

    2. Re:Weather does affect it by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 4, Insightful

      By that metric weather affects everything, and you'd be asking a completely useless question.

      Ladies and gentlemen, we have a winner!

      Most people realize the actual question being asked is whether cloud computing is affected by weather more than other generic things, to which the answer is no, in fact it's less affected by weather than other generic things. What do you prove by deliberately misinterpreting the survey question?

      Rank the following in terms of likelihood:

      1.) A person thinks cloud computing involves actual clouds.
      2.) The people running the survey deliberately asked ridiculous or trick questions in order to get a sensational response that would drive readership and therefore profits.
      3.) A person genuinely gave an over-literal response due to the weather's actual ability to take out a data center despite the question being intended to gauge whether a person thinks cloud computing involves actual clouds.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    3. Re:Weather does affect it by quantaman · · Score: 2

      Actually, no, it sounds like it WAS a completely useless question. Most people did NOT realize what the question being asked was about.

      "54% of Americans do not know what the cloud is and claim to never have used it. ... also, another alarming number is that 51% of the surveyed Americans think that stormy weather can interfere with the functionality of the cloud."

      So, if 54% surveyed had never heard the term, and and almost identical 51% surveyed who don't know it refers to computing services over the Internet, then it doesn't mean people are stupid, just uninformed, and the second number means nothing (of course, the survey doesn't mention how these numbers overlap, which makes it all the more useless).

      And honestly, I would bet over 50% of those who BUILD network-based services that could be considered "in the Cloud" think the whole "Cloud" terminology is one of the stupidest things pseudo-technology journalists and marketers have foisted on the public in years. Based on the over-saturation of "the Cloud", I'm surprised everyone isn't starting to call the Internet "the Tubes"...

      People have different definitions about what it means to know what something is, if you ask me if I know what a guava I'm aware that it's a fruit, and I know it's supposed to be nutritious, but if you asked me to pick out one from a set of unfamiliar fruits my odds would be no better than chance. Should I say I know what it is or not?

      We know that 54% of people feel like they don't know what cloud computing is, we also know that 51% of people are so uniformed that they think cloud computing has something to do with weather. These questions are testing different things, and while an overlap would be very nice, we can still surmise that the public is both largely uninformed, and aware of the fact they're uninformed, or there were a lot of people being smartasses and saying the cloud is affected by weather because everything is.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    4. Re:Weather does affect it by sjames · · Score: 2

      A ground fault can certainly be a danger...

      It's absolutely shocking how often they turn up.

      I'll be here all week, try the waitress

    5. Re:Weather does affect it by quantaman · · Score: 2

      "Nutritious fruit" isn't a particularly descriptive label,

      And the question wasn't "can you describe a guava", it was "do you know what one is". "A fruit" is the correct answer, nutritious or not. The answer to the question that was asked is "yes".

      if I had the idea the other person knew anything about gauvas my answer to the question "Do you know what a guava is?" would probably be "not really".

      Do you judge your knowledge of something against what you think the other person knows all the time? Would you tell Mario Andretti, were he to ask you "do you know how to drive?" that "no, I don't"? Poor guy, if everyone did that, he'd never be able to use a cab or hire a limo.

      Questions are defined by their context, if Mario Andretti was drunk at a party, and looking for a ride home, I'd say yes, if we were at a race track I'd probably say no since he was probably really asking "Do you know how to drive a race car?"

      --
      I stole this Sig
  4. I am more worried about the 49%... by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... that believes that the cloud is this magical place disconnected from the utility grid, immune to lightning strikes, floods, storm surges, etc. etc.

    --
    -- the cake is a lie
    1. Re:I am more worried about the 49%... by epyT-R · · Score: 2

      Marketing can be blamed for that 49%.

    2. Re:I am more worried about the 49%... by PRMan · · Score: 2

      Fuck the cloud. All my data is in Heaven administered by God! Nothing can go wrong. Everything is where it should be. Simply perfect.

      "Heaven. Are you good enough?"

      I've heard that God doesn't take care of data for people with such foul mouths....

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    3. Re:I am more worried about the 49%... by cffrost · · Score: 2

      Fuck the cloud. All my data is in Heaven administered by God! Nothing can go wrong. Everything is where it should be. Simply perfect.

      Rationalizing disk failure won't bring your data back.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    4. Re:I am more worried about the 49%... by Quinn_Inuit · · Score: 3, Funny

      Fuck the cloud. All my data is in Heaven administered by God! Nothing can go wrong. Everything is where it should be. Simply perfect.

      Rationalizing disk failure won't bring your data back.

      Just wait three days.

      --

      Stop learning! Only you can prevent esoterrorism.
  5. Also in the news by colin_faber · · Score: 5, Funny

    Surveys suggest most surveys are wrong :)

    1. Re:Also in the news by xevioso · · Score: 2

      Statistics show otherwise.

    2. Re:Also in the news by newcastlejon · · Score: 2

      Most surveys aren't wrong; they're purposefully designed to yield a particular result (usually one that sells newspapers).

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
  6. Per the newspaper of record, it does. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/06/30/amazon-web-services-knocked-offline-by-storms/

  7. Re:I weep for my country by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Insightful
    My uncle is a biological engineer; he was a member of the team who first managed to grow human body parts in rats.

    I asked him what he knew about 'The Cloud' the other day; his response?
    "How the fuck should I know? I'm a biological engineer, not a goddamn weatherman!"

    In a saner world, our educational systems would teach science and technology...

    You seem to be confusing "science and technology" with "marketing buzzwords."

    Stop it. Stop it right now.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  8. or when rain / rain water get's in the phone / cab by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    or when rain / rain water get's in the phone / cable lines.

    Also stormy weather can take down your cable line even if you still have power in your area the cables from your place to the headend may have areas with no power and dead battery (they don't have the number of needed portable generators to cover all of them) in the nodes.

    DSL works better and the phone RT's (Remote Terminals) and central offices have a better power backup system.

  9. Ironically by JWW · · Score: 2

    Ironically, one of the bigger outages we had where our AWS instances went down was due to ..... weather.

  10. time to add to the ever growing by nimbius · · Score: 2

    BOFH collection, which includes but is not limited to:
    blade computing requires routine sharpening
    grid computing can sometimes get out of alignment and needs to be centered and degaussed sometimes
    clustered computing includes a creamy nougat center
    network degradation can be attributed to stains on the network fabric that didnt come out after the last wash
    the datacenter certification plaque specifies the air pressure for the tires as well as the type of oil to be used in the cloud

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  11. Bad Title by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2
    should read:

    Survey Reveals a Majority Know "the Cloud" Is Affected by Weather, Along With Pretty Much Everything Else

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  12. Satellite rain fade by tepples · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or when you're stuck out in BFE where cable and DSL aren't available and rain fade hurts your satellite connection. Not that people who rely on satellite would use "the Cloud" anyway because of the single digit GB/mo caps typical of satellite Internet service.

    1. Re:Satellite rain fade by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or when the rain provides enough interference that you can no longer poorly piggy-back on your neighbor's WiFi.

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    2. Re:Satellite rain fade by aurispector · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or when people find stupid survey questions amusing and deliberately answer them incorrectly.

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
  13. Packet storms by WaffleMonster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Funny they list facebook, twitter, online photo sharing, online banking and shopping as "the cloud". It would be interesting to hear from TFA what on the Internet does not count as "the cloud" ?

    Had noticed TFA is making fun of people who think stormy weather can "interfere with the functionality of the cloud" when just a few weeks ago an electrical storm triggered a massive outage in the Amazon "cloud".

    For icing on my cloud cake we have marketeers commenting about how everyone has a favorable view of the cloud when the only thing that seems clear is too many people including the author does not seem to have a coherent grasp of what it is their talking about.

  14. But they are not entirely wrong. by Nadaka · · Score: 2

    Bad weather can knock "the cloud" offline or make access unreliable, Bad weather can knock down suspended power and data lines, interrupting access between you and the cloud. It can flood service tunnels, basement and first floor switches and short out improperly sealed equipment.

  15. "On Somebody Else's Computer". by wanderfowl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've said it before, and I'll say it again. Every instance of "In the Cloud", facing a naive end user, should be replaced with "On somebody else's computer". This study shows that people have absolutely no idea what The Cloud is, and that might, just maybe, be affecting their choice of what to upload to it. "I keep our business records in the cloud" sounds sane, but “Oh, don’t worry, all of our business information is backed up on somebody else’s computer” doesn't.

    1. Re:"On Somebody Else's Computer". by starfishsystems · · Score: 3, Informative

      A useful distinction can be made between Public Cloud and Private Cloud, and it puts the matter on firmer technical ground.

      Private Cloud is when the hardware is yours. It lives inside your firewall and is subject to your security practices. Public Cloud, conversely, is not yours.

      Having cleared up that detail, we can talk about what makes it a "cloud" and not just a bunch of services running who-really-cares-where. Essentially, it comes about as a consequence of virtualization. There's a qualitative difference between saying, "I need to buy a server with X capacity in order to run my application," and creating an instance of your application in a cloud. Yes, they both ultimately depend on hardware capacity, but there is a separation of concerns between the abstract resources that your app needs and how they are physically provided. You tend not to think about servers any more but about instances of things. It encourages a more modular, more fluid way of solving problems.

      For example, I've been talking with one of my colleagues this week about setting up a package repository. That's a server which delivers software packages for clients to install. New packages have to be added to the repository automatically, and they have to be signed. Now, this raises the awkward question of where to maintain the private key used for signing each change to the repository. We found ourselves having to rule out all of the possible algorithmic options. The essential requirement is that the signing has to be encapsulated inside something that can peform computations. What we really need is a specially hardened server that does nothing but sign changes to the repo. But who can afford to buy a whole server just for that one narrow purpose? If the server is virtual, the resource issue goes away.

      Of course, other issues remain. Just as there is an inherent security risk in having unrestricted access to a physical server, there is risk in having comparable access to a virtual server. In principle, disaster recovery in a virtualized environment ought to be more robust than in a physical one, because you can maintain a perfect digital record of everything that went into creating that environment. But even if you keep that record offsite in multiple bank vaults, if you have never tried to actually bring up and test a virtual environment with it, you may be in for a big surprise.

      So I don't want to do what the marketing people do and say that cloud solutions are magically wonderful. There's a useful separation of concerns in a cloud solution that, I believe, leads to a more elegant way of approaching design problems. And there's a big difference between private and public cloud that the people selling public cloud services don't really like to talk about. As to whether a cloud solution has specific advantages for you, I think one of the most surprising results is that it comes with a change of thinking.

      --
      Parity: What to do when the weekend comes.
  16. Re:I weep for my country by causality · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I asked him what he knew about 'The Cloud' the other day; his response?
    "How the fuck should I know? I'm a biological engineer, not a goddamn weatherman!"

    Okay, despite his confusion, at least he admitted he was ignorant about the subject. At least he didn't go and form a strong opinion and start arguing about a subject he knows nothing about.

    "Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge'." -- Isaac Asimov

    This Slashdot article may as well have said "average public school-educated Americans unable to distinguish their own (obese) ass from a hole in the ground."

    Sure that may sound like I am being negative. But it's so hard not to be negative about this. Without even considering its finances, there is good reason to question the long-term viability of my nation. You just can't have this many adult people who hate thinking, who embrace anti-intellectualism, and expect to remain prosperous. It's not even just anti-intellectualism, as though that were not bad enough. Emotional intelligence is on the decline as well, and it manifests as a bunch of people who generally mean well, but are far too self-absorbed to understand things so basic as "needlessly blocking a doorway in a public place is rude".

    They do mean well but they tend to be childish, indulgent, and haven't the maturity to overcome their own thoughts and their own worries. That's why when I say "self-absorbed" I don't mean it in terms of narcissism, I mean it in terms of having become so thoroughly alienated from their fellow humans that they are unable to consider how their actions affect others. Generally the USA is becoming decadent like every other great nation just before its collapse.

    I am seriously wondering just how hard it is for an American to immigrate to a small Western European nation and become a naturalized citizen.

    --
    It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
  17. Re:I weep for my country by icebike · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In a saner world we wouldn't let hypsters foist stupid names on an entire industry for things as simple to explain as "remote storage".

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  18. The Root Cause of This Belief... by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 2

    The root cause of this belief is what allows companies to sell cloud computing.

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  19. Re:I weep for my country by Dahamma · · Score: 2

    This particular problem with the US is not with technology education, it's with antiquated power and communications grids. Though fortunate not to be exposed to any wars on home soil in the last century, it means many of these systems consist of 100 year old wires strung up on wooden poles rather than buried underground like much of Europe, etc. Weather thus *significantly* affects Cloud computing in many areas of the country...

  20. So what... by HockeyPuck · · Score: 2

    ahahah let's all laugh at the ignorance of the masses... I'm sure there are plenty of lawyers/doctors/plumbers that laugh at the /. crowd for their lack of knowledge...

    Most people in IT can't agree on the same definition of cloud, or what it is and what it is not. Is cloud an application, infrastructure, platform, API? It can be.

    In other news...

    Most Americans think RAID is a bug spray.

  21. Key European Computing Hub in Ireland Outage 2011 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, a huge data center in Ireland was knocked out by a severe storm last year, causing major disruptions. Why people seem to think Cloud computing = distributed computing I have no idea. See http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2011/08/07/lightning-in-dublin-knocks-amazon-microsoft-data-centers-offline/

  22. Random binary distribution FTW! by conspirator23 · · Score: 2

    51%? So what this tells me is that a majority of respondents didn't understand enough to care, or didn't care enough to understand and provided random answers. This is what happens when you take squishy social science methodologies and put them in the hands of even squishier marketing consultancies. Just bend the scientific method over and shove a white paper up it's ass.

  23. Re:I weep for my country by Mashiki · · Score: 5, Funny

    In a saner world, we'd just ship all hipsters to Seattle, and be done with them.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  24. Re:or when rain / rain water get's in the phone / by ibsteve2u · · Score: 3, Informative

    Roger that...there are still Telco lines out there that are wick...eh, I mean paper insulated "dry" core.

    --
    Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
  25. Re:or when rain / rain water get's in the phone / by MrLint · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was told once by the cable crew who came to fix my cable, that because of squirrels eating at the cable, water had leaked in. As it was a 3 pole run,, some stupid amount of *gallons* of water poured out of the cable.

  26. Re:I weep for my country by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You seem to have a severely myopic view of what is important in the world. Until very recently, even cloud providers could not define cloud computing beyond whatever their implementation was. Not knowing what "the cloud" is does not exemplify in any way anti-intellectualism. I think your rant is a generalized one, way off topic, and pretty much a knee-jerk response to any sign that someone doesn't know about something you consider important.

    Reading your post history, you realize that you are part of a small minority of people who are aware of the business behind service offerings, whether it is data mining of social networking or broad categories such as cloud offerings. Based on that reading, it should not surprise you to find that people don't care how their phone works, or what powers their website. And they don't want to know. Not because of anti-intellectualism. They just have no need to know, or don't have any connection to people who do know.

    Sure they lack curiosity, but we can only say that about this subject, where they may have interests in mechanics or art or cuisine instead.

    So you have rated your opinion of the nation on people who don't need to know about something, being asked about that thing, and making a guess based on the information they already have at hand. Or, you used this as an excuse to jump up on your soapbox.

    Either way, you are my example of why someone should pity a culture, not the people who were busy minding their own business when a surveyor gave them a pop quiz.

    The actual study has a much less exaggerated title, and as far as I can tell from the actual survey, it was a true random sampling. Ask a random person what "the could" is, given no context, and I'm surprised that only 29% said it related to weather. "51%" is described as "most", and as posted above that bunch of people are technically correct that weather can cause problems, including damage from lightning and flooding or just plain power outage.

    The margin of error was +/- 3% meaning it could have been as low as 48%. You can't even claim "majority" with those numbers. And this was an e-mail invitation to an online survey. Automatically, anyone who clicked on an unexpected mail to answer questions is an idiot, but my opinion aside this is self-selection. There is no description of what measure they took to ensure the sample was anything other than "too stupid not to click."

    So now you got your panties in a bunch over "People who think it's okay to click on e-mail links don't care how technology works." Which everyone here already knew.

  27. Re:I weep for my country by Delarth799 · · Score: 2

    And then nuke it from orbit yes?

  28. Re:I weep for my country by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, we'd nuke it from the cloud.

  29. Re:or when rain / rain water get's in the phone / by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was told once by the cable crew who came to fix my cable, that because of squirrels eating at the cable, water had leaked in. As it was a 3 pole run,, some stupid amount of *gallons* of water poured out of the cable.

    I had a cable guy try to tell me that the plasma in a plasma TV was the same as the plasma in human blood. I gave up trying to explain it to him as he was pretty adamant about it. I can only imagine how he thought the manufacturers got it.

  30. Re:I weep for my country by Obfuscant · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Okay, despite his confusion, at least he admitted he was ignorant about the subject. At least he didn't go and form a strong opinion and start arguing about a subject he knows nothing about.

    And, from reading TFA, neither did those 51% who thought that weather would interfere with the cloud. They were asked about it and they answered. They weren't protesting on the streets demanding something be done about the weather to protect their access to the cloud.

    You just can't have this many adult people who hate thinking, who embrace anti-intellectualism, and expect to remain prosperous.

    So you think that people who don't know what the rather nebulous concept of "the cloud" (which is quite appropriate since "clouds" are already nebulous and consist of many different kinds) is "hate thinking" etc. etc.? Quite a leap, I'd say.

    They do mean well but they tend to be childish, indulgent, and haven't the maturity to overcome their own thoughts and their own worries.

    And people who rant about others who simply don't care about technical things are grown up, mature individuals who are fastidious? By the way, I think you want to call them "self-indulgent", because most people are indugent of others.

    I am seriously wondering just how hard it is for an American to immigrate to a small Western European nation and become a naturalized citizen.

    I sense that this statement is much like the random movie or TV star who tries to influence voting trends by claiming that "if X wins, I'm moving to England" or similar. It's not hard to move to Europe, but why you'd want to become a citizen there is a mystery. You'd just be stuck in the same kind of situation where you'd threaten to "move to the US" if politics didn't go the way you wanted.

  31. Re:Key European Computing Hub in Ireland Outage 20 by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 2

    This cloud== distributed computing. Everyone else? Not so much.

  32. Re:I weep for my country by sjames · · Score: 2

    So how is it different from client-server? Other than "It's HIP, it's NEW, give me the mooola!".

  33. Stormy Weather affects the Cloud? by RNLockwood · · Score: 2

    No way! I don't know if Stormy Weather is alive but if she is she must be in her 70s. Bump, grind, BUMP - there goes another server off line! More bumps, grinds, etc and whoops there goes her top. What a rack! STACK OVERFLOW.

    --
    Nate
  34. That's not the only worry by jc42 · · Score: 2

    We just had a cloudless day around here. I wonder how well cloud computing works on such days. How would parts of the cloud communicate with each other?

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  35. Re:or when rain / rain water get's in the phone / by Obfuscant · · Score: 5, Informative

    I can only imagine how he thought the manufacturers got it.

    It's what's left over after they make Soylent Green. By-product.

  36. Re:I weep for my country by cpu6502 · · Score: 2

    >>>Okay, despite his confusion, at least he admitted he was ignorant about the subject.

    Which is actually the OPPOSITE of what modern schooling teaches. The current method taught in education is that admitting you don't know will get scolded by the teacher ("Shame on you! Should have read the chapters!"). Plus it is better to GUESS on the typical mutliple choice test than leave it blank because you don't know.

    So more of this government schooling would just lead to MORE of these types of answers from Americans: "Is cloud computing affected by weather?" Um.... well it's a cloud, haha. So I'll guess yes. (Surveyor writes down yes.)

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  37. Re:I weep for my country by cpu6502 · · Score: 2

    >>>strictly speaking the cloud is 'remote storage and remote processing', which is a bit of a mouthful

    "Mainframe computing"
    Term invented in the 1960s or 70s (not sure which). Why do people think it's necessary to come up with new terms for old concepts? The other day I read about something called a "plugin hybrid" that is supposed to be revolutionary leap forward in automobiles. Then I realized it's the same concept as the old 1920s Electric Cars that were sold with add-on generators. New term; old concept.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  38. Re:or when rain / rain water get's in the phone / by roc97007 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Had I mod points, I'd mod this informative just to see people's reaction.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  39. Re:I weep for my country by roc97007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > You seem to be confusing "science and technology" with "marketing buzzwords."

    You are my favorite person for this week. And it's only Wednesday.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  40. Re:I weep for my country by roc97007 · · Score: 2

    > In a saner world, we'd just ship all hipsters to Seattle, and be done with them.

    I just now had a fantasy of a town without hipsters... Of being able to go into a coffee shop and not have to stand behind a skinny guy in a long leather jacket with a shaved head ordering a drink so complicated that the clerk has to take notes. ...and then demand in a screechy voice that she check "in the back" for whatever esoteric food item he wants that they don't have.

    John Pinette voice: Get out of the liiiiine.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  41. Re:or when rain / rain water get's in the phone / by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 3, Funny

    I worked in a Fortune 115 company where the VOIP went down, and along with it all incoming calls. Root cause was Squirrel. Yes, the cute furry toothy bitches.

    Official explanation was: squirrels had gnawed off the insulation. One particularly unlucky squirrel had successfully penetrated the insulation, fried itself, and everything around it.

    Traditional squirrel fry was held, a good time was had by all. Also, 2/3 of this post is true.

  42. Re:I weep for my country by OakDragon · · Score: 4, Funny

    "How the fuck should I know? I'm a biological engineer, not a goddamn weatherman!"

    Is his last name "McCoy" by any chance?

  43. Kim Dot Com says.. by Anarchduke · · Score: 2

    You are absolutely right. There is no reason to worry about losing your data on the Cloud.

    --
    who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
  44. Re:or when rain / rain water get's in the phone / by Hatta · · Score: 2

    Surely they need plasma from Soylent Red and Blue too.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  45. Re:or when rain / rain water get's in the phone / by AliasBackslash · · Score: 2

    Obviously that is the 1/3 of the comment that isn't true.