Slashdot Mirror


US Particle Colliders In Need of Funding

DevotedSkeptic writes "When the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Switzerland seized the world record for the highest-energy collisions in 2010, it also sealed the fate of the leading US particle collider. The Tevatron, at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia, Illinois, was closed the following year to save money. Now, physicists at another US physics facility, the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven National Laboratory in Upton, New York, are trying to avoid a similar end. On 13 August, researchers at the ALICE heavy-ion experiment at the LHC at CERN, Europe's particle-physics lab near Geneva, announced that they had created the hottest-ever man-made plasma of quarks and gluons. This eclipsed the record temperature achieved at RHIC two years earlier by 38%, and raised uncomfortable questions about RHIC's future. Tribble still hopes to avoid having to close any of the three facilities. In 2005, he notes, a similar crisis was averted after an advisory committee laid out the dire consequences of flat funding for the future of US nuclear science. In the end, Congress came through with the budgetary increases required. 'What we want to do here is to spell out what will be lost under different budgets,' he says. His committee is planning to hold a final meeting in November, in time to influence the budget requests from US funding agencies for the next fiscal year."

19 of 133 comments (clear)

  1. One word by famebait · · Score: 5, Funny

    Kickstarter

    --
    sudo ergo sum
    1. Re:One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Three words: move to Switzerland

    2. Re:One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      And lose the "made in the almighty US" label? Oh, the horror!

    3. Re:One word by __aaeihw9960 · · Score: 3, Funny

      And lose the "made in the almighty US label*? Oh, the horror!

      *Label Made in China

    4. Re:One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know you're joking, but people sometimes seriously suggest donations/fundraising as a way to run facilities like DoE labs... but it's usually a bad idea.

      Specifically, it's not sustainable. Massive science experiments such as those run by the DoE need decades of commitment. Donations and fundraising are simply too variable and capricious to support them. Constantly shriking and growing budgets is wasteful, because you have to cyclically fire/hire personnel, mothball equipment and then pay to rebuild it, and so on. This is always disruptive, but for massive experiments (e.g. accelerator projects) it would be hugely wasteful. This is to say nothing of the fact that an uncertain funding environment will not attract the best talent.

      Another possible problem is that soliciting external donations is that it doesn't grow your budget--the higher-ups will simply use it as an excuse to cut part of your budget... leaving you in the exact same position you were in before (actually worse, because you are now depedent on different capricious funding streams). There are ways to pull in external funding from other agencies, but it must be done carefully and with support/guarantees from those providing the base funding (in this case, Department of Energy, which in turn is funded through congress).

      Disclosure: I work at Brookhaven National Lab. The above are my views and do not represent an official message from BNL or DoE (thus, posting AC).

    5. Re:One word by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 2

      No, they already have one...the Beijing Beltway

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    6. Re:One word by drerwk · · Score: 2

      Sell the rights to what? The exact mass value of a Higgs boson? The cross section of U-235 for neutron capture?

  2. Two strageies by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

    (1) have the RHIC invade another country. It's the easiest way to spend several hundred million dollars "off the books"

    (2) spread the management and construction out over the territory of no less than 51 Senators and/or 220 Reps. Why do you think NASA is scattered all over the country? It's not because there are prime launch sites in TX, OH, and MD, among others.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  3. Re:Research is no dick-contest by firex726 · · Score: 2

    That's why I like the LHC...

    Everyone chips in and it's up to them to decide how to use their money. They don't have to keep going back every year to re-interview for their jobs.

  4. The USA is losing interest in science... by Viol8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... it seems to me as an outsider. Which is ironic that it was science and engineering that created the USA as it is today. I don't know if its a dumbed down education system, lack of political direction or just a slowly growing luddite mentality. If it doesn't want to be an also-ran following in Chinas heals (as it already is in the manned space race now) then it better do something about it fast. But I won't hold my breath.

    1. Re:The USA is losing interest in science... by __aaeihw9960 · · Score: 2

      I won't say that it's a dumbed down education system that is causing this, but I will say that our education system is suffering. I don't know where along the way we decided to value hedge fund managers, investment bankers and stock traders over the people who teach our children, clean our streets and put out fires, but we're there.

      I do honestly believe that it has quite a bit to do with the undying stereotype of the bookworm. In recent months there has been quite a bit of coverage on the presidential race (obviously). In multiple stories, multiple individuals have stated that the various candidates from the Republican party have been trying hard not to seem too "bookish". To me, being "bookish" isn't an insult. To me, being well-read, well-researched, and well-prepared is a good thing.

      I'm not saying this is entirely a republican view either, but they seem to be getting most of the coverage.

      I believe that the root cause of all of this is media. Media wants a good story. Good almost always equates to painful, sad, or stupid. So, we get coverage of the jackasses who protest soldier's funerals. We get 24/7 coverage of murder, rape and despair. We get 24/7 coverage of religious whackos being proud in their ignorance, forcing their views on everyone in the name of 'freedom of expression' or 'freedom of religion', and giving normal, rational and intelligent religious folks across the nation a bad name.

      I honestly believe that mass media is to blame for how we view most social problems. I honestly believe that there's money to be made in stereotyping people on welfare and printing that story, which then will inadvertently lead to a generation of folks brought up believing that message. I'm not saying that the choices to cover inane, idiotic, painful and sad stories were made in a dark room by billionaires. I do not believe that. What I believe is that stupid sells. People want to escape the mundane aspect of their lives, so stupid stories, sad stories, murder and mayhem sell easily.

      This then creates a generation of children brought up on these dumbass stories. These children see less-harm in that type of media, and get bored with it. Therefore, media outlets have to amp up their stories. Then more children. Then worse stories.

      Science, no matter how you frame it, is inherently un-sexy. Engineering, believe it or not, doesn't turn that many people's knobs.

      You know what does? Snooky.

      Does that taste like ashes in your mouth? It should.

  5. FRIB not fully funded as well by quetwo · · Score: 2

    One of the new projects, announced just months before CERN opened was the Federal Rare Isotopes Beam project in Lansing, Michigan. Since congress committed to funding it fully in 2008, it's only received a small portion of the full funding -- with the current congress kicking the pledges down the road year after year. Funding has been augmented for this facility by private investors, but that will also dilute the type of research this facility will be able to do once it is complete..

  6. Just went on RHIC tour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just went on a RHIC tour on August 5th with my son. The tour guide said that one of the things that was special about the RHIC was that it can smash atoms of different types. For example they said that they could smash a gold atom into a uranium atom which is not possible at any of the other particle accelerators. I am just a layperson so I don't know if this is really unique but the tour was absolutely awesome. I thought that I would only be able to see this from a distance. But the tour guides (grad students) let you climb all over this thing and take pictures and ask lots of questions - they were very patient. I got to poke my head right into the business end of this thing. Very cool.

  7. Re:Crisis? by jpstanle · · Score: 2

    When it comes to cutting edge particle physics research, "We can still do useful work here," sounds like a pretty compelling case to me.

  8. Get rid of the TSA, problem solved by smooth+wombat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The TSA budget is $6.5 billion. Get rid of the TSA and their security theater and that will go a long way towards funding these scientific endeavors.

    I realize defunding the TSA will immediately allow the hordes of terrorists lurking in our country to go into action, but that is a chance we'll have to take if we want to slow or halt the downward spiral of science in this country.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  9. Obvious Solution by organgtool · · Score: 2

    These physicists should get private funding instead of expecting the U.S. government to keep bailing them out. I'm sure there would be plenty of private companies looking to put money towards a project that would benefit humanity without ever making a profit. And if not, then that means there was nothing valuable to be gained and we haven't wasted any more money on such nonsense, right?

  10. Obviously by greatgreygreengreasy · · Score: 2

    ... the answer is privatization. The private sector can always do a better job than government, and is much more efficient! Republicans NEED to win this fall so that they can cut funding completely, cut harmful regulations on nuclear research, and get this country back to science's true mission, making money! ~

    --
    LRN 2 SWM
  11. Re:Crisis? by BlueStrat · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yeah 'cause the republitards are so invested in science eh ?

    The Dems had full control of Congress and the WH for 2 years, and they still have the WH and the Senate. They spent staggering amounts of other people's money.

    Funny how the "Party of Science!!" didn't see fit to bother spending any of that loot on these projects.

    Heck, they still could. There's billions of (un)Stimulus money still unspent that Obama could use Executive Orders to direct a tiny fraction of towards these projects and fully fund them.

    Actions speak louder than words, and the Dems through their actions are screaming that their political pals getting a boatload of our cash is far more important than science, despite what they say in their talking points on TV.

    Truth be told, *neither* party really gives a rip about all that "science stuff" when it comes right down to it, if it doesn't give them some kind of political advantage and/or funnel some cash to an ally.

    Stop being so blinded by (D) and (R) partisan distractions. It doesn't make you look smart. It makes you look like a mind-numbed drone.

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  12. Do it the Apple way by Noughmad · · Score: 2

    1. Get a patent for a round underground object
    2. Sue CERN
    3. Don't really need this step, it's just here for formatting.
    4. Profit!!!

    --
    PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.