Slashdot Mirror


Intel Embraces Oil Immersion Cooling For Servers

1sockchuck writes "Intel has just concluded a year-long test in which it immersed servers in an oil bath, and has affirmed that the technology is highly efficient and safe for servers. The chipmaker is now working on reference designs, heat sinks and boards that are optimized for immersion cooling. 'We're evaluating how (immersion cooling) can change the way data centers are designed and operated,' said Mike Patterson, senior power and thermal architect at Intel. 'I think it will catch on. It's going to be a slow progression, but it will start in high-performance computing.' Intel's test used technology from Green Revolution Cooling, which says its design eliminates the need for raised flooring, CRAC units or chillers. Other players in immersion cooling include Iceotope and Hardcore (now LiquiCool)."

230 comments

  1. Wait, isn't oil flammable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is it really a good idea to put computers and hydrocarbons that closely together?

    What if there's a fire?

    1. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      Is it really a good idea to put computers and hydrocarbons that closely together?

      What if there's a fire?

      Most people would put it out. What, exactly, were you thinking?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It depends on what they use, but the worst case is the production of acetylene. Every year a couple of large transformers explode due to this. As a protective measure, transformers are inerted with nitrogen gas and have detection elements. Computers shouldn't test these limits, but you never know. A hot spot (resistor or capacitor) on a damaged unit could potentially start generating acetylene. But since the units appear to be vented, there should be no buildup.

    3. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Diesel is an oil product that isn't flammable... unless you compress it. Even crude oil is quite hard to light and requires addition of quite some energy to get it lighted, gasoline and certain other oils are the very flammable ones but there are quite some oils that would be considered inflammable under the conditions in a computer.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    4. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by mirix · · Score: 2

      Mineral oil is combustible in the same way that wax, sugar, wood, etc, are. It burns, but it isn't flammable, as the flashpoint is way too high.

      You need to hold it at a high temperature to sustain combustion (like a wick, for example).

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    5. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by gagol · · Score: 2

      The technique has been field tested in submarines for quite a long time.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    6. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Informative
      This is a bit confused, I'm afraid. Diesel has a flash point of 100 to 200 Farenheit depending on the type of fuel, etc. If you get it that hot, or hotter, it can accumulate enough flammable vapor to burn.

      In a Diesel engine, compression heats it, and it ignites. But compression is not the only way to ignite it.

    7. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gasoline vapors are fairly flammable. Gasoline, not so much.

      I was once on a long road trip with my father when the panel van began to have problems. It was the fuel filter.

      We pulled over to a service station, but parked on the asphalt. To replace the filter my dad had to drain the fuel line. Soon there was gasoline all over the asphalt. But gasoline doesn't play nice with asphalt. So to pretend that he wasn't fscking up the station's new asphalt, he smoked a couple of his unfiltered camels while it was draining and dropped the lit stubs onto the gasoline soaked asphalt.

      I thought he was nuts and decided briskly walked over to the Wendy's next door. But my dad had been around the block more than a few times, and in retrospect I see that he knew precisely how close to the line we could get without blowing everything up. Gasoline just isn't as flammable as in the movies. And you'd think the vapors would have ignited, but it wasn't enough. Probably it was the asphalt.

      If you think about it, modern engines goes through a lot of trouble to efficiently burn gasoline. I'm no chemist, but I just don't think it's as flammable as, say, alcohol or natural gas.

    8. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 2

      Yes...it will ignite very readily with a match. Have watched too many people burn brush piles with it when I was a kid. It doesn't flash up or the vapors don't ignite like gasoline, but burns steadily.

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    9. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by gweihir · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes. I remember on of the main threats to submarines being fires....

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    10. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Diesel burns quite well. You just need something like a "wick". Even salad-oil burns that way. And once it is heated up a bit, it does not need the help anymore.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    11. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I'd worry more about the tendency of oil to dissolve various substances, and also evaporation.

    12. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by arth1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      In general, you need a wick. Diesel won't burn by itself, unless the temperature is very high or the air superoxygenated.

      The same is true for gasoline, by the way. I used to fill a bottle cap with gasoline, and stub out my cigarette in it. It never caught on fire. The "no smoking" rule of gas stations is mostly because of people using open flames to light their cigarettes and pipes in a fume filled environment, and not so much a cigarette that isn't hotter than many exhaust pipes.

    13. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by arth1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is a bit confused, I'm afraid. Diesel has a flash point of 100 to 200 Farenheit depending on the type of fuel, etc. If you get it that hot, or hotter, it can accumulate enough flammable vapor to burn.

      You need a certain ratio of vapour to air, and you still need something to ignite that vapour mix.

      In a Diesel engine, compression heats it, and it ignites. But compression is not the only way to ignite it.

      This is misleading at best, reading like you compress the diesel. You don't - liquids don't compress.
      You compress air, which heats to a heck of a lot more than 200F (more like 1000F), and also puts more oxygen per volume in the chamber. The high temperature of the air combined with the high O2 level allows the combustion to take place.

    14. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Diesel burns quite well. You just need something like a "wick". Even salad-oil burns that way. And once it is heated up a bit, it does not need the help anymore.

      Unless you pump in a lot of air or oxygen, it still needs a wick.
      However, soot can act as a wick too (which is why a candle can burn for so long).

    15. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes. I remember on of the main threats to submarines being fires....

      Wait, were you being sarcastic? The number one main most dangerous thing about being on a submarine is a fire breaking out.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    16. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by the_rajah · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I work in the elevator business as an Engineer. One day I was working on software in a new installation when the service man with me got a call to service an elevator in a mansion nearby. He suggested I come with him as it was an interesting installation. It was indeed. This was a three stop elevator installed in 1917 and all original and working just like it did almost 100 years ago. The controller resembled a cast iron bathtub with a lid having the relays mounted suspended from it. When the lid was lowered the relays were suspended in oil. I've seen some very old elevators still in use, but never one like that.

      --


      "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
    17. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 0

      What if there's a fire?

      Oh, be realistic. This is Intel, not AMD!

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    18. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Most people would put it out. What, exactly, were you thinking?

      Maybe tossing a bag of fries into the hot oil?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    19. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by gagol · · Score: 1

      Mineral oil can be neutral... especially when compared with water : look for universal solvent. Evaporation would not be a problem in a sealed system.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    20. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Not really surprised. I worked in heavy industry back in the early 2000's, and we'd immerse our relays and some of our transformer blocks in oil to keep them cool, especially if they were going to very hot parts of the world. In some cases we'd fully skip the electronics, and go right to plain relays for the setups if they were going anywhere where: Power/voltage issues were going to be a problem. Or where brownouts/spikes were going to be a problem. Or where contamination would be a serious issue.

      The main reason was, in the customers case it was easier to either get the parts, or to manufacture a replacement on site than it was to try getting a hold of an electronic replacement. Especially if a PLC would be held up in customs for 3 weeks.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    21. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by Jawnn · · Score: 1

      "Flammable" is a relative term, in practice. Most things will burn, given the right conditions, "oil" included. But there are many types of "oil", some hydrocarbon, some not. Each type will have it's own "flash point" and "flame point". It's safe to assume that the oil used for cooling servers will have values for those characteristics will above what will likely be seen in the data center.

    22. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by tsotha · · Score: 3, Informative

      And yet if you drop a match in a coffee can full of diesel it will gutter out without lighting the fuel.

    23. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

      Is it really a good idea to put computers and hydrocarbons that closely together?

      What if there's a fire?

      It works really well if you keep the oxygen out of the system or if the oil vapor pressure is low enough that it doesn't create a flammable headspace.

    24. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Interesting
      About 30 years ago, I saw a fireman demonstrate that he could thrust a burning blowtorch flame into gasoline quickly, and it would gutter out without setting it aflame.

      The liquid part isn't what does the burning. It's the vapor.

    25. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by alienzed · · Score: 0, Redundant

      That's ridiculous, a submarine can't burn, it's under water!

      --
      Never say never. Ah!! I did it again!
    26. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by fnj · · Score: 1

      Or unless it is atomized, for example in a crash.

    27. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people would put it out. What, exactly, were you thinking?

      Hmmm, I would send a polite email to the fire department...

    28. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by subreality · · Score: 2

      A word of warning: the oil in the tub was almost certainly a full load of pure PCBs. They were ideal for the purpose: highly dielectric, nonflammable, stable. They're great so long as you look past the fact that they're horribly toxic and carcinogenic, so they were very widely used in exactly that kind of application. Be careful if you ever have to crack one open again.

    29. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      You don't - liquids don't compress.

      Of course they do. You just need a lot of pressure, but liquids and solids certainly do compress. Water is IIRC about 4 orders of magnitude less compressible than air.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    30. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or he might have just been agreeing with the parent comment.

    31. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by smash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Plenty of motorcycle engines are also air/oil cooled. The concorde even used JET FUEL for cooling.

      Without exposure to air (to enable combustion to happen), and a temp approaching the flashpoint of the fuel, there's no fire risk.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    32. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just terminate fire.exe, that always works.

    33. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      I'd say a better question is "Why are they planning for oil cooling in the first place, what are they not telling us?" because i thought Intel got away from the "power piggie space heaters" when they got rid of Netburst, in fact up until Bulldozer on the AMD side both had been lowering the heat with each release.

      So I have to wonder what the engineers have told the suits to get everyone on board such a radical change. Maybe their tick tocks are about to run out of steam, maybe they are having serious issues with the die shrinks and electron leakage, who knows? In any case it does make me wonder what is going on in their R&D section to suddenly decide they need to go oil cooling for their chips.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    34. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by necro81 · · Score: 2

      I used to fill a bottle cap with gasoline, and stub out my cigarette in it

      Were you all out of water?

    35. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Plenty of motorcycle engines are also air/oil cooled. The concorde even used JET FUEL for cooling.

      Fuel is "always" used for cooling, these days. For instance, electric (solenoid-operated) fuel injectors are cooled by fuel. And in the good old days when diesels were mechanical, their pumps were nearly always cooled only by fuel. I have two like that.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    36. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Besides the screen-doors keep all of those pesky fire-bugs out.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    37. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      The other thing is an elevator that old very well could have been a 600VDC unit (many turns on the windings) and between current surges on make and inductive induced arcing on break, air insulated relay contacts would burn through quite quickly, the oil insulation would quench the arcing much faster than air would.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    38. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Yes. I remember on of the main threats to submarines being fires....

      Wait, were you being sarcastic? The number one main most dangerous thing about being on a submarine is a fire breaking out.

      I was not being sarcastic at all. I was thinking of a number of incidents that US and Russian submarines suffered. Including the Kursk (as you linked), and that US sub that recently burned out while in dock.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    39. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by EXTomar · · Score: 1

      Is it really a good idea to put computers and hydrocarbons that closely together?

      What if there's a fire?

      That is easy enough for any software engineer to handle: Code to handle SIGFIRE.

    40. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

      Is it really a good idea to put computers and hydrocarbons that closely together?

      What if there's a fire?

      You get a firewall. ;)

    41. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      True, but his point is still correct about it being the air that is compressed, which happens to have droplets of fuel suspended in it. Those droplets themselves will certainly be compressed ever so slightly, in the same sense that water in a glass compresses slightly every time you exhale, or the atmosphere of the earth expands whenever you light a fire.

    42. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      And while you are at it, why not also grill a couple of sausages above the fire.

    43. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's too much to ask to also set the message priority to "Important".

    44. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This is misleading at best, reading like you compress the diesel. You don't - liquids don't compress."

      I hate to nitpick, but they do. Otherwise you wouldn't have shockwaves travelling through water. Liquids aren't actually incompressible, even though for a lot of purposes they can be assumed to be. In your case, I'm sure your the assumption holds, but the statement that "liquids don't compress" is not true in general.

    45. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Diesel is an oil product that isn't flammable... unless you compress it.

      I think what you were trying to say is that diesel fumes, unlike gasoline vapors, won't ignite from a spark...

    46. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by jittles · · Score: 1

      I think the spin on the article was "Our products are greener when you cool them with oil instead of air conditioning." That seems pretty reasonable to me. Mineral oil has been used for cooling overclocked machines for sometime. It seems like the long term cost of using mineral oil to cool a server farm would be much lower than using air conditioning. Fluids typically do a much better job of transferring and holding heat. So why do you assume that it is some sort of engineering problem? I think its just to try and make their products look better for the environment. It's quite trendy.

    47. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by GungaDan · · Score: 2

      "Fluids typically do a much better job of transferring and holding heat."

      The pedant in me wishes to point out that air is also a fluid.

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    48. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How could he have resisted a cast-iron bathtub, you insensitive clod!

    49. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      This is why you should not let Lusers near the servers, they are made of hydrocarbons too.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    50. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by wooferhound · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't you cool the oil with air conditioning ?

      --
      We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
    51. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were you all out of water?

      It's a tough economy, got to save money where you can.

    52. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      But they already cool the chips with liquid, its simply sealed in heat pipes and isn't near as messy, and more importantly its been working just fine up to and including the latest chips.

      Which again makes me wonder, what aren't they saying? We've already heard how the die shrinks are getting harder and harder to pull off thanks to how many bad chips per wafer they are getting along with electron leakage, and lets face it Intel has to have something new to sell you, otherwise why not stick with what you have?

      Servers don't need more powerful GPUs so the APU direction the consumer side has been going, which it looks like is about to run out of steam as well, just look at the latest benches on the Intel and AMD APUs and you'll see they quickly become bottlenecked by the slower system memory, so to sell you new chips they need more IPC, more MHz, and or more cores. AMD has been throwing more cores to the point that with Bulldozer the design actually hurts performance but Intel has had enough IPC they haven't needed to go apeshit with cores like AMD, but if they are going oil cooling my guess is they see the writing on the wall with the die shrinks and are gonna need something else to sell the chips while it takes longer and longer to work on the bugs in each new process.

      So if I have to take a guess its that there is gonna be serious issues that are gonna take serious time to work out on the next die shrinks so they are gonna try to sell new chips by cranking up the speed by binning the best chips of the current process for the server line. Makes sense, servers make more money per chip than consumer and both Intel and AMD have done this in the past, but the catch is faster chips equal more heat and if they are really gonna crank the clocks to sell the next chips they are gonna have to deal with all that extra heat, hence the oil.

      But I don't buy the environmental angle, you don't go to all the trouble and mess and expense of switching to something radical like that unless you have no choice.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    53. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by OdinOdin_ · · Score: 1

      There is a lot of money to take from consumers at the top end.

      With the recent announcement of 5/6 GHz CPU being possible and with AMD working on their sequel architecture changes it is important to have a product to put at the top end since holding the crown up there causes a lot more sales across the range.

      The same kind of reason why plenty of low end cars are sold by prestigious brands, people like to associate with the brand knowing they make the best (at the top end), easily overlooking the fact they have the budget model and it is not built in anyway the same.

    54. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by smash · · Score: 1

      I agree, full immersion cooling sounds retarded. Far better to do with radiators (to dissipate actually the heat transferred into the oil), a pump and less liquid. Oil is heavy. Filling the entire case with it, even if it does work fine, will just turn your 30kg rack mount machine into a 50-60kg rack mount machine.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    55. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by smash · · Score: 1

      Yup, aware of that. However concorde used it as a heat sink (pretty sure it was an integral part of the air conditioning system), rather than to reduce combustion temps in the engine.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    56. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Well it just makes sense if you think about it. Look at how each die shrink has taken longer and longer and both Intel and AMD are having more errata with each shrink. Intel is already down to what? 20nm? We all know that the smaller the gate the more likely it is to have electron leakage and when you are talking servers you can't have a system that occasionally flips a bit and gets the math wrong, its just not acceptable.

      Well that only leaves them 3 ways to sell you new chips if the die shrinks start hanging, and that is faster GPUs, faster clocks, or more IPC. The first one is right out when it comes to servers because they have no use for a four socket server that plays HD video, so that leaves MHz and IPC. We haven't seen any indication that Intel has some radical new process to give IPC any major boost, lets face it since Core 2 they have been getting the majority of their gains in shrinks and better GPUs built in.

      So with no GPU or IPC angle that only leaves raw MHz and as we've seen time and time again you start cranking the clocks and the heat ramps up VERY quickly. Once you get up around 3.8GHz on either companies chips the heat really starts to crank which is why AMD has been selling liquid cooling for their ultra fast binned chips, too much heat to cool with a conventional fan even with heatpipes.

      My guess is next year for the server line Intel is gonna announce over 4.6GHz clocks on their high end, maybe even over 5GHz. Makes sense, faster clocks with a good design like Core means they can get some serious number crunching and especially on the HPC side number crunching is the #1 reason for buying these superchips.

      Personally I think AMD, Intel, and MSFT are all gonna realize what we PC builders here in the trenches already know, which is there really isn't any higher they can go. Already in the consumer market i'm not seeing anyone replace before it dies, because what is the point? The machines I was selling FIVE YEARS AGO were Phenom I X4s with 4Gb of RAM, what average consumer needs more than that? I don't work corporate anymore but from hearing from friends that do they are seeing the same thing, the chips that both companies have been putting out the past few years are extreme overkill.

      Now Intel wants us to believe the servers of the world are gonna be turned into these giant heavy fishtanks, just so they can crank the clocks higher? Hmmm...don't think so. I think other than IPC most simply won't buy, not when they can buy a traditional 2 or 4 socket and have more power than they know what to do with without changing their entire layout.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    57. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by smash · · Score: 1

      The other thing they can sell is higher core/thread counts. I'm not sure if you've compared IPC of a core2 vs sandy bridge, but depending on the processing being done, there can be several order of magnitude speed improvement. AES in hardware for example is 30x faster on the Core i series.

      There is some way to go software wise for thread counts to scale effectively, but we are getting there. Most of the bulk batch jobs that end users do are embarassingly parallel in any case (transcoding being a big one).

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    58. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Well that is what AMD has been doing and at least on the consumer side its pretty much a bust. I have a 3 year old Phenom X6 and frankly leaving everything on, having a half a dozen things in the taskbar and multitasking my ass off the chip just has more cycles than I can cram.

      And on the server side how many cores are we up to? Something like 48 for AMD and 24 or 36 for Intel? The problem is those huge numbers of cores are really only good for two niches, datacenters where they are running a shitload of VMs and HPC. while its true there is good money in those fields there isn't enough to keep a company the size of Intel in business, and the regular businesses and even medium corps just don't have enough useful work to max out the chips from 2 years ago, much less monsters like Sandy and Ivy.

      The problem that AMD, Intel, and MSFT face is that software simply hasn't kept up. Writing true multithreaded software? HARD. And we haven't had a "killer app" that really slams the chips in day to day use for quite awhile. All three companies got used to the kind of turnover they saw during the MHz wars where entire companies and home users alike were going through systems every 3 years but that just ain't happening anymore. I have quite a few small to medium sized businesses running first gen Core Duos and Phenom X3 and X4 chips and they have no intention of upgrading...I mean why should they? The machines they have now have so many cycles to spare they could double their workloads and still not max out the chips!

      So while I agree that there is a niche that will always need higher core/thread counts, hell I gave my X4 to my youngest so I could get an X6 simply for multitrack audio mixing which with effects can use as many cores as you can throw, but those kind of niches simply aren't large enough to sustain a large corp like Intel, especially when you are talking about having to rip out your entire rack system to put in fishtanks just to run the thing.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    59. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by jittles · · Score: 1

      I would expect the oil to be cooled with a radiator. You could easily pump the oil outside to a heat exchanger. Sure you could do the same thing with air but it wouldn't be nearly as efficient.

    60. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      No, not in a diesel. The fuel is injected after the air is compressed. which prevents it from igniting prematurely. (This also requires that diesel injectors be capable of much higher pressure than those in gas engines). A gasoline engine does compress the fuel/air mixture, but the compression ratio is much lower - in general, the temperature rise is insufficient to cause ignition.

    61. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by smash · · Score: 1

      I think they'll still sell cores by default. If you think software hasn't kept up, the real laggard is IO bandwidth.

      To get the faster IO, you need a new motherboard. Which uses the new socket, and the new CPU.

      And yeah, writing multithreaded software is pretty hard, but apple is headed in the right direction with grand central. There's plenty of software I run on my macbook that makes use of all 8 threads. Increasing use of sandboxing/virtualisation on the desktop will consume more cores as well.

      But I agree, software hasn't kept up in general. There are still big gains from the new CPUs in the niche workloads that you typically wait a long time for to complete though (transcoding, compiling, etc). And really, any less waiting I do, the better.

      The mobile space also has a long way to go. At the moment, it is all about race to sleep. The CPU in my machine for example (core i7 2720QM) is blisteringly fast, but when pressed consumes a huge amount of battery and generates a large amount of heat. Actually pushing the machine whilst on battery (e.g., handbrake) can drain it totally in 45 minutes or so. The faster it can get a job done and get back to sleep, the better.

      If we can get similar performance with lower power draw and thermal output - or faster cores that can simply "race to sleep" faster, there's a win for mobile.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    62. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      If you consider lint, the bane of cooling systems, then we have to appreciate liquid cooling via immersion. Every year, I open my desktop machines, vacuum the lint from where I can, use the compressed air to blow the lint from the cpu cooler fins, and check the fans, replacing any which has stopped turning.

      I do keep a machine for 6 years, and after that, figure that it is time to upgrade that box.

      Lint, builds up, even with the lint filters and controlled air flow.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    63. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      That is something I have been wondering for awhile now...how long until we hit the bandwidth wall? I mean we are already seeing with the APUs that you have to get the absolute fastest memory the board can possibly take and even then the GPUs are hamstringed by bandwidth, I saw that first hand when I got a good 30% boost in my Brazos netbook simply by ripping out the 1066 for some OCed 1333, and the more cores you add the more those cores are gonna have to be fighting for ever tighter bandwidth pipes.

      But what you are seeing on your i7 is exactly why i chose Brazos. I sat down and figured up what jobs I HAD to be able to do mobile and what i could save for at home and found by leaving the heavy loads at home I can get 7+ hours of battery life, more if I wanted to put up with an extra pound and get a 9 cell, and just leave the heavy lifting for the X6 where I have a giant heat pipe CPU cooler that keeps it icy cold. I never understood trying to fit uberchips in a laptop, I mean how many times do you HAVE to transcode a 1080p video on the road?

      I agree though that mobile has a way to go, what I think we are gonna end up doing is having more specialized chips for specific jobs. Since I haven't kept up with Intel naming conventions I'll use AMD numbers as examples, like Brazos II for those that need long life above all, Liano for your average user that wants a big screen and to play WoW, and your Piledriver style uber hot chips for those that want to use a laptop as a desktop replacement. Why you would want to do that I have no idea, but some people do for some reason.

      But at the end of the day I have customers on 5 and 6 year old chips that are happy as clams, simply because software hasn't kept up anywhere close to the hardware I have customers running Solidworks and Photoshop and Quickbooks on Phenom I X3s and X4s and the machine twiddle their thumbs most of the time because there just isn't enough work to slam all those cores. As we get into 8 and 12 core units that situation is just gonna get more obvious, which is why I say PCs are rapidly becoming like washers and dryers in that nobody replaces until the previous unit dies. I mean why should they? Win 7 is supported for another 8 years, all their software loads super fast with an SSD, they have 4Gb+ of RAM, they simply have more resources than the software can use.

      Personally I'm all for it, I like being able to play and game and transcode videos at the same time on my 3 year old X6 without lag, sure beats having to build a new unit every year like I did during the MHz wars.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    64. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by smash · · Score: 1

      Oh don't get me wrong, i don't transcode on battery. But its just an illustration of how far we have to go with regards to power consumption vs. throughput.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    65. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      That isn't what I don't get, sure doing ANY heavy lifting on a battery would be dumb, my Brazos plays L4D, GTA:VC, and even Crysis just fine but I sure wouldn't do it on a battery.

      No what I don't get is why you would want a chip THAT overpowered in a laptop? To me dropping a chip THAT badass into a laptop form factor is like dropping a V16 into a Pinto, even if you can get it to run you're gonna have a car that is so hot your oil is practically boiling and the radiator might explode.

      To me what makes more sense in the thing laptop FF is somewhere in the neighborhood of an i3 or those llano X4s. With those you have a system that can do pretty much any job you'd want to do while on a battery without the system feeling like its gonna melt any second and the poor little fan just spinning like mad trying to cool the heifer.

      So THAT is what I don't get, not the battery part. Now I DO have some customers that buy a laptop and use it in the desktop role because they can't afford 2 systems, but those folks ain't buying i7s either. for those folks I usually get them a Liano X4 which seems to be the sweet spot price/performance wise and more importantly they don't roast your nuts when you actually use the thing on the road. I just can't see why anybody would want an uberchip like an i7 in a form factor that is gonna hamstring the shit out of it because of cooling issues.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    66. Re:Wait, isn't oil flammable? by smash · · Score: 1

      My reason for it is because my laptop is a desktop replacement. This time around, I haven't bothered to upgrade my desktop hardware - Laptop hardware is powerful enough these days to plug into AC when at a desk and heavy lifting is required, and still be able to take the machine on the road with me - getting decent battery life for the low-processing stuff while mobile, and getting all the horsepower when i get to an AC outlet.

      LAN gaming session? No monitor to lug around, no big case to carry in from the car in 2 trips, no mess of cables everywhere, no syncing, no issues with "oh crap, that's on my other machine", etc.

      I also get free battery backup.

      As far as I'm concerned, desktop hardware is mostly dead. This is beginning to be reflected in hardware sales of portable vs desktop machines. Sure, there are a few niches where you can get better performance (extreme high end gaming, etc.), but for the most part, laptop hardware now is plenty to run just about any consumer application out there.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  2. Liquid Metal CPU cooler by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    This brings back good memory for the liquid metal CPU cooler that I used a while back

    A review is at http://www.guru3d.com/article/danamics-lmx-superleggera-review/

    Unfortunately the vendor already closed its doors, or I would have bought more coolers from them

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Liquid Metal CPU cooler by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      That things is completely ridiculous.

      If you have to build a custom case because your cooler is a giant turbine, you might as well go with immersion as so many others have in the past.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    2. Re:Liquid Metal CPU cooler by scheme · · Score: 4, Informative

      The cooler uses a NaK alloy. Check youtube and you'll see that this reacts violently with water and will ignite in air. The company claims that they wouldn't worry about leaks in the cooler but I wouldn't trust them or want that stuff near my expensive hardware. The craziness of using NaK alloy as a coolant for a computer is probably why the company closed it's doors.

      --
      "When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it
    3. Re:Liquid Metal CPU cooler by Riddler+Sensei · · Score: 1

      Holy Christ. That thing is pumping sodium-potassium alloy through your computer. This stuff is used for coolant in some nuclear reactors. I had a passing thought some years ago at how humorous it would be if someone was actually crazy enough to use it to cool a desktop computer. It's a good coolant but it is VERY volatile. I don't think I, or my insurance, would be very comfortable having that in my home.

      Danamics had this to say in the guru3d article:

      But what if the product leaks, one might ask? Well simply we don't believe it can. Only by mechanically damaging the product, this would be possible and even that scenario has been taken into account. If the metallic closed loop structure is cut open, only a small amount of NaK will surface. This will coagulate during oxidation which tends to plug the leek preventing additional NaK from leaking out. The coagulation process is actually started by contact with water - more precisely from the moist in our air. NaK exposed to the ambient air can be seen as a grey substance.

      I'm typically not squeamish on things such as this but...if they were to reopen up shop I'd be more than hesitant to give it a shot. Even if it were completely safe I can only imagine disposal would be tricky on a large consumer scale.

      Wikipedia article on NaK.

    4. Re:Liquid Metal CPU cooler by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      The cooler uses a NaK alloy. Check youtube and you'll see that this reacts violently with water and will ignite in air. The company claims that they wouldn't worry about leaks in the cooler but I wouldn't trust them or want that stuff near my expensive hardware. The craziness of using NaK alloy as a coolant for a computer is probably why the company closed it's doors.

      Not to mention it is twice as much money as the zalman which outperforms this cooler in every way.

    5. Re:Liquid Metal CPU cooler by ThePeices · · Score: 1

      If a technology company cant even spell leak ( leek ) or moisture ( moist ) then I have absolutely no faith in anything that they do.

      If they let simple things like that slide, then who knows what else they have missed.

      No thanks.

    6. Re:Liquid Metal CPU cooler by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

      It is a Danish company, I would cut them some slack.

    7. Re:Liquid Metal CPU cooler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a good coolant but it is VERY volatile.

      You're using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

    8. Re:Liquid Metal CPU cooler by Riddler+Sensei · · Score: 1

      Oh no, I'm very aware that volatile concerns how willing a substance is to vaporize. You took the #1 definition from our lord and savior, the dictionary (especially the online version). But you forget the secondary definition:

      2.
      Tending or threatening to break out into open violence; explosive: a volatile political situation.

      Aside from the political example it describes NaK perfectly - able of breaking out into open violence.

    9. Re:Liquid Metal CPU cooler by Riddler+Sensei · · Score: 1

      On the forgiveness of the language I do agree, on everything else I would need some convincing (and believe me, I would LOVE something as cool as a liquid metal cooler).

    10. Re:Liquid Metal CPU cooler by fnj · · Score: 1

      Agreed that it is way beyond stupid to employ any substance containing sodium in commercial or common industrial apparatus, but NaK is hardly the only metal which has a usefully low melting point. Disregarding mercury for obvious reasons ...

      Gallium melts at 30 C, which means it will melt in your closed fist. The metal is not considered toxic, though I wouldn't go crazy screwing with it a whole lot, or drinking it or rubbing it all over my skin if it escaped. The ions of soluble gallium salts can be toxic to the liver. It is certainly far less dangerous than NaK, and arguably less dangerous than fluorescent bulbs, which contain mercury vapor encapsulated only by a thin glass housing.

      30 C is probably low enough to allow a carefully designed cooling apparatus using Ga to be useful in cooling servers, considering you have ample wiggle room up to at least 50 C, if not 70-100 C, before the CPU overheats. I would imagine tubes of highly thermally conductive copper (plated of course) would allow thorough melting and convection to establish itself throughout the loop, though the cold side heat exchanger design would be a challenge (at least to me). You might have to manege startup carefully.

      But there is a much better choice than pure gallium...

      The eutectic alloy trademarked as galinstan, which is 68.5% Ga, 21.5% In, and 10% Sn, melts at -19 C, which means it is completely liquid at any temperature from well below room temperature, and the boiling point is > 1300C (!) This one is a no brainer. The cooling apparatus would be easy to design. If frozen outdoors in very cold winter, it would thaw rapidly and naturally indoors. It has low toxicity and low reactivity. The MSDS says:

      No adverse health effect has been observed or reported.
      Exposure quantities are significantly below acute toxicity limits even when complete absorption is assumed.
      The extremely low vapor pressure of Galinstan makes absorption through inhalation negligible.
      Galinstan passes through the digestive system without effect.
      Skin oils may be reduced through continuous contact.
      Direct contact with the surface of the eye may cause irritation.

      Sounds pretty benign. You can get oral thermometers using galinstan, though oral mercury thermometers have pretty much disappeared from the supply chain.

      You can readily obtain gallium and fairly readily obtain Galinstan. The latter especially ain't cheap, at least to small-timers.

    11. Re:Liquid Metal CPU cooler by dbIII · · Score: 1

      That's the sort of stuff that's used to do accelerated testing for liquid metal embrittlement. It's like sticking a big wedge in a crack and hitting it with a sledgehammer.

    12. Re:Liquid Metal CPU cooler by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The manual for a some multimillion dollar magnesium casting equipment made in Japan contains the line "Please ensure that the porpose is clear".

    13. Re:Liquid Metal CPU cooler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, sorry for that gentle ribbing (I don't think Vizzini was particularly out of line with "inconceivable"). I didn't look it up in the dictionary either.

      I hear the word in it's chemical context all the time, and I hear it in it's political context fairly often as well. I just don't hear it in a chemical context using the borrowed political meaning by people that know the chemical meaning.

    14. Re:Liquid Metal CPU cooler by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wouldn't trust them or want that stuff near my expensive hardware.

      Wow, you care WAAAAY too much about your hardware.

      I wouldn't tust them or want that stuff near ME.

      Screw the computer.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    15. Re:Liquid Metal CPU cooler by ldobehardcore · · Score: 2

      To ensure cetacean transparency? XD

      --
      Hectice, baby, Mercator says hello to you
    16. Re:Liquid Metal CPU cooler by heathen_01 · · Score: 1

      People self heal. Computers not so much...

    17. Re:Liquid Metal CPU cooler by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Except all your parts aren't nasty and dripping with mineral oil when you try to swap out a sound card. How the hell do you clean the mineral oil off your sound card? Let it sit a while and it'll drip away until you have a thick, sticky film of dust mixed with oil.

    18. Re:Liquid Metal CPU cooler by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I'd guess it because saying "My computer is so uber-awesome that it uses the same cooling system as Nuclear reactors", just doesn't have the same ring to it anymore.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    19. Re:Liquid Metal CPU cooler by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, NaK makes sense when your operating temperature is thousands of degrees. I can't see how it makes sense for a CPU. Nobody but the Russians even used it in Nuclear Submarines, though the sub that used it is one fast sub.

      And what is its melting point? Wouldn't the stuff freeze when you turn off your PC?

    20. Re:Liquid Metal CPU cooler by budgenator · · Score: 1

      My wife always used to complain that I never read the assembly instructions, and I always used to figure that the guy that wrote the instructions didn't have the instructions. So the wife bought this Chinese made shelf thingy out of the typical pressed stink wood. She was really harping on me to read the instructions, so I figured I'd better read them or I'd never hear the end of it if something went wrong. I opened the instructions and started to laugh, I handed them to my wife and she read, "Put together until looks like picture"!

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    21. Re:Liquid Metal CPU cooler by Riddler+Sensei · · Score: 1

      Ah, I saw this the next evening so I'm not surprised if you never see this. Sorry for sounding so defensive. It's just that there are so many needless pedants on Slashdot. But given that I was talking about a substance in the context of chemistry, yes a different word was probably in order.

  3. Economy of Scale by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

    I hope this stuff hits the discount rack soon.

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  4. Not all oils are flammable by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    One example of non-flammable oil is Silicone Oil

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicone_oil

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Not all oils are flammable by cheese_boy · · Score: 5, Informative

      One example of non-flammable oil is Silicone Oil

      You don't even have to go non-flammable - large transformers that you might see next to buildings have been using oil as a coolant and insulation for decades.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformer_oil

    2. Re:Not all oils are flammable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bigger issue would be using a flash safe oil unless the system isn't sealed like transformers. DOW has a tonne of products to address this.

    3. Re:Not all oils are flammable by erice · · Score: 1

      One example of non-flammable oil is Silicone Oil

      You don't even have to go non-flammable - large transformers that you might see next to buildings have been using oil as a coolant and insulation for decades.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformer_oil

      They also explode and catch fire every now and then. Of course, they are also carrying high voltages and statistically it is pretty rare.

    4. Re:Not all oils are flammable by demonlapin · · Score: 2

      One blew directly over my head - I was perhaps three feet from the pole - when I was a kid. Big blue flash of light(ning), huge explosion, smoke rising... it was awesome.

    5. Re:Not all oils are flammable by postbigbang · · Score: 4, Funny

      And now you have eleven posters of Tesla in your office?

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    6. Re:Not all oils are flammable by demonlapin · · Score: 2

      Nah, I'm not the Oatmeal guy.

    7. Re:Not all oils are flammable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most transformer oil used today is silicone oil.

    8. Re:Not all oils are flammable by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      I think most transformers that explode are used at 150% of their rated capacity and/or expected lifetime.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    9. Re:Not all oils are flammable by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Glad to know that we wouldn't have to depend on OPEC for this. Any idea which places this can be found? Or does it have to be manufactured, using SiO2 as one of its input materials?

    10. Re:Not all oils are flammable by sFurbo · · Score: 1

      Silicones are manufactured.

    11. Re:Not all oils are flammable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That or they pissed Megatron off.

    12. Re:Not all oils are flammable by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Big blue flash of light(ning), huge explosion, smoke rising...

      I hate to rain on your parade, but unless you were also drenched in burning transformer oil, what you likely experienced was a fuse blowing. They are designed to go off like a stick of dynamite so that the blades separate quickly to prevent arcing. I have seen fully-open fuses arc over 12 inches until it finally quenched.

      Example video

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    13. Re:Not all oils are flammable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I once watched a lightning storm travel over a small valley, striking the power lines (local distribution lines, not the big towers). A transformer would blow up about every five minutes as the lightning took it out. Very pretty to watch. This was back in about 1970.

    14. Re:Not all oils are flammable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, what was it, ten years ago? 20? when I first read of silicon brake fluid being used in a sealed computer case as a liquid coolant. No fans, no circulation, nada; just the heat transmitted to the case walls and radiated from there.

      Worked fine, they overclocked the hell out of the CPU with no issues. Just one hell of a mess if you had to pull the motherboard to do anything.

      Might not be adequate these days though, with the super-fast video cards and their own cooling demands.

    15. Re:Not all oils are flammable by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      I remember the smoking can and it seemed more impressive, although that may just be rosy-colored nostalgia. However, maybe a fuse right next to the transformer? Or just inside the case?

    16. Re:Not all oils are flammable by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Every* transformer has a primary fuse right beside it to help prevent overloads from causing the dreaded blown transformer. A fuse blowing is an inconvenience; a transformer actually overheating and 'blowing' is a life-threatening event. Fuses are cheap, lives are not.

      *Where 'every' means all the pole-mounted ones I'm familiar with (central VA area). I'm sure there are exceptions pad-mounted transformers.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  5. Cray did this decades ago by gkndivebum · · Score: 1

    Cray did this decades ago: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cray-2

    --
    Breathe continuously
    1. Re:Cray did this decades ago by Trepidity · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not to mention Slashdot's own coverage (possibly incomplete):

      2003, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2010, 2011

    2. Re:Cray did this decades ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, except it used a custom inert liquid, Flourinert, not some commodity oil.

    3. Re:Cray did this decades ago by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      FTFS

        'We're evaluating how (immersion cooling) can change the way data centers are designed and operated,'

      immersion cooling is already a proven technology, doesnt matter what the medium is.

    4. Re:Cray did this decades ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Funnily enough, the 2005 link has a comment complaining that this featured on Slashdot of 1999.

      CPU Cooling Insanity
      Posted by CmdrTaco on Saturday May 29 1999, @12:31PM
      from the everyone-needs-a-hobby dept.
      moonboy writes "I saw this over at Ars Technica. This dude submerged his entire motherboard in mineral oil. As if that weren't enough, he then and got a 5,000 BTU (window?) unit and circulates the oil through the coils to keep it all cool." Don't expect Gateway to be offering these any time soon... I suspect it will a bit more than just void your warranty. It'll probably make motherboard engineers come to your home under cover of darkness carrying loaded shotguns :)

    5. Re:Cray did this decades ago by Compaqt · · Score: 3, Funny

      These low UID users are so old, they've been replaced by Beowulf clusters of nanobots that remember every single Slashdot post ever.

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    6. Re:Cray did this decades ago by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Eh? Speak up sonny, you sound like an AC... :b

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  6. that;s why I use carbohydrates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cool my computer with cold beer.

    I use a beer cooler!

    And when it gets too warm, I serve the beer to Englishmen.

    1. Re:that;s why I use carbohydrates by kelemvor4 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you suggesting someone waste beer on cooling a server? You should be in prison.

    2. Re:that;s why I use carbohydrates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, he's suggesting beer should be earmarked as 'high performance server coolant', the keg as a 'coolant storage reservoir' and the tap as a 'used coolant bleedoff valve', the latter to be placed in the bofh's office next to the coffee machine.

    3. Re:that;s why I use carbohydrates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Preferably you would use multiple kegs of different types of beer for redundancy. This is referred to as a "beer storage array".

    4. Re:that;s why I use carbohydrates by fustakrakich · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't worry. It's Coors... Not really suitable for human consumption.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    5. Re:that;s why I use carbohydrates by ExploHD · · Score: 1

      Imagine a beowolf cluster of those!

    6. Re:that;s why I use carbohydrates by oPless · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't worry. It's Budweiser ... Not really suitable for human consumption.

      FTFY

    7. Re:that;s why I use carbohydrates by RaceProUK · · Score: 2

      Don't worry. It's Fosters... Not really suitable for human consumption.

      FTFY

      AFTFY

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
  7. I cool with air you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cool with air you insensitive clod.

  8. Hardware failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happens when a server has a hardware failure? Take it out of the oil? That must be fun!

    1. Re:Hardware failure by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Take it out with some gloves, do the repair, put it back. If done properly you would only need to clean up a little bit. You could also simply replace the whole module and ship it back to manufacturer. Even in servers there is little to repair these days, fans, hard drives, anything mechanical is usually the culprit. RAM, SSD, CPU's don't die (after burn-in testing) for decades.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:Hardware failure by afidel · · Score: 2

      Ram dies all the time, it's my second highest AFR part after hdd's and ahead of both fans and psu's which are the only other components with a statistically significant failure rate.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:Hardware failure by smash · · Score: 1

      More to the point, 5-10L of oil is heavy, if you need to move the machine around, etc.

      This is what radiators and heat sinks are for. Full immersion cooling = colour me unimpressed.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  9. Not only safe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...but if you put the server room near the cafeteria, you can make fries too.

    1. Re:Not only safe... by guruevi · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think chunks of fries and burgers (and cell phones and other crap that gets dropped into the oil in restaurants) may cause certain issues with the flow of the heat.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:Not only safe... by mirix · · Score: 2

      Mineral oil is generally used as a laxative, so unless they are cooling with vegetable oil, I'd advise against this. :-p

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    3. Re:Not only safe... by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      P'Shaw, that's never stopped McDonald's or burger king!

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  10. What "News"! by Ashenkase · · Score: 2

    Everything old is new again.

  11. It's great until... by gpmidi · · Score: 1

    Oil works great until you have to remove something...

    1. Re:It's great until... by pla · · Score: 2

      Oil works great until you have to remove something...

      You realize, of course, that datacenters don't "remove" anything smaller than an entire blade (or depending on the scale involved, they pull an entire rack). Then they rotate a spare into place, ship the bad one out the door, and let the vendor screw around with figuring out "why" it failed.

      Intel doesn't mean for your average Mom n' Pop running Windows SBS in a half-rack mounted PowerEdge to use immersion cooling.

    2. Re:It's great until... by gpmidi · · Score: 1

      But why do I keep having to remove line cards from an MLX-16 or PCIe cards... You're right in some environments, but not all. And I'm not including anything as small as you're implying.

    3. Re:It's great until... by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      But why do I keep having to remove line cards from an MLX-16 or PCIe cards...

      ..maybe because you are doing it wrong.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    4. Re:It's great until... by scheme · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oil works great until you have to remove something... You realize, of course, that datacenters don't "remove" anything smaller than an entire blade (or depending on the scale involved, they pull an entire rack). Then they rotate a spare into place, ship the bad one out the door, and let the vendor screw around with figuring out "why" it failed.

      I doubt most datacenters swap out racks. Unless they've built a crane into the datacenter, you'd need to get a forklift to move the entire rack and there isn't clearance for that. Swapping blades is entirely reasonable, swapping 1U servers less so unless you have some really smart automation and failover to reimage the server and get it back to the previous state.

      --
      "When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it
    5. Re:It's great until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very true, but removing an entire blade at 3:00 in the morning when on your day off and dead to the world is annoying enough, but having to deal with mineral oil and its issues (dripping over the floor making a slip hazard), not to mention having to clean up greasy fingers after inserting/removing the blade, just compounds the issue.

      If a data center changes out a rack at a time, that is a different story, but a lot of enterprises go by blades, and that can get messy really fast, especially if the backup admin has zero experience with mineral oil cooling.

    6. Re:It's great until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh man, you should have seen that IBM rack (42u fully loaded with disk shelves, servers, UPS, the whole nine yards. Total worth high-mid 6 digits) that I moved onto a truck.

      Note to self: Never use the official ramp that comes with an IBM rack when the rack is full. Holding a full rack from collapsing sideway due to a broken ramp with only 2 people fending it off is 1 of the most exciting highlights of my career. IT took 8 programmers from the office to stuff the rack onto the truck.

      Of course, this is an atypical situation.

    7. Re:It's great until... by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      Not to mention a failed server having sensitive internal data on it... You don't ship those out. If you can't erase the drive you destroy it.

    8. Re:It's great until... by Anonymous+Sniper · · Score: 1

      I work as a field engineer for a large unix systems company (also lots of databases and such)... spend most of my days swapping FRUs (field replaceable units). HP, Sun, IBM all work the same way. Most parts are a single board or at most 2-3 bolted together. We very, very rarely have to pull a whole 1U system (easier/cheaper to replace the system board).

    9. Re:It's great until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oil works great until you have to remove something...

      You realize, of course, that datacenters don't "remove" anything smaller than an entire blade (or depending on the scale involved, they pull an entire rack). Then they rotate a spare into place, ship the bad one out the door, and let the vendor screw around with figuring out "why" it failed.

      I doubt most datacenters swap out racks. Unless they've built a crane into the datacenter, you'd need to get a forklift to move the entire rack and there isn't clearance for that. Swapping blades is entirely reasonable, swapping 1U servers less so unless you have some really smart automation and failover to reimage the server and get it back to the previous state.

      He still sort of has a point, in a datacenter environment, if a system had no internal user replaceable parts, nobody would bat an eye. It has to be serviceable to some degree, but not ripping all the guts out. Even then, who's to say it couldn't be done, servers aren't all squeaky clean as they are anyway.

    10. Re:It's great until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody sane does that.

      OK nobody sane does that twice ;).

    11. Re:It's great until... by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      If you're running a datacenter of any reasonable size, there's lots of common automation that makes pulling a 1u server convenient and easy. At the most basic level, kickstart + puppet + a load balancer makes the process pretty seamless - shut the machine down, and it's automatically removed from the pool. Pulling the box, and re-installing require far less human time than troubleshooting hardware problems.

      If you use OSS, that approach is actually simple and free. Cobbler, puppet, and haproxy make this kind of environment more or less trivial to setup. Puppet is best practices for maintaining even a small site.

      If you invest heavily in virtualization, it's usually sufficient to live migrate your VMs onto your spare capacity.

      A lot of the really big sites I've worked at went much further... We'd usually just pull the bad machine out of production, and replace it with a warm spare. This approach works really well for the kind of site that would use oil cooling. Leave failed hardware where it is, and just spin up a little spare capacity.

  12. What about the weight? by sub67 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seems to me this would add a considerable load to whatever flooring is in place.

  13. They used to say ... by PPH · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... that the British don't build computers because they couldn't figure out how to get them to leak oil.

    I welcome our new UK computing overlords.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:They used to say ... by mirix · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they can get Lucas involved. Then it can leak oil and release magic smoke at the same time.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    2. Re:They used to say ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This coming from a nation that can't make a car able to go round corners properly (or sell well in any foreign market).

    3. Re:They used to say ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Aside from, you know, inventing the computer.

    4. Re:They used to say ... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      This coming from a nation that can't make a car able to go round corners properly

      Well, we made the Corvette, and before that the Cobra. We've even made Mustangs with IRS. As it turns out, most of the time we don't care. Most of our roads are mostly straight, by miles traveled. Most of us live on a flat near a coast, we don't live in hill country as I do. That's because we have lots of flat, and lots of coast.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:They used to say ... by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      Ford powered the Cobra, but the car itself was a modified AC Ace, built by AC Cars in Surrey, England.

  14. I was considering something like this a few years by Nadaka · · Score: 1

    I was considering something like this a few years ago. But instead I went with conventional air cooling inside an ornately carved wooden case instead.

    Note that capillary action inside the cable tends to create oil drips all over the place unless you inject glue/epoxy into all your cables to seal the the tiny gaps between insulators..

    http://www.pugetsystems.com/aquarium_computer/V2/module.php

  15. ARM servers making in progress... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so intel embraces more efficient cooling. Any other good reason they did not do this years ago?

    dell 'Copper' arm server:
    http://content.dell.com/us/en/enterprise/d/campaigns/project-copper

    mineral oil cooled vps host:
    http://midasgreentech.com/

    1. Re:ARM servers making in progress... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so intel embraces more efficient cooling. Any other good reason they did not do this years ago?

      Because making more efficient processors is better in the long run. Liquid cooling just doesn't scale well.

  16. 2006 do-it-yourself ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From Tom's Hardware 2006 article: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/strip-fans,1203.html

  17. Deep fried chips are delicious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And have plenty of carbon for a nutritional diet.

  18. 2000 do-it-yourself by jcohen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    June 30, 2000: Slashdot reports that some overclockers have solved their cooling problem by immersing their motherboard in Fluorinert. Crazy kids. Who knew it would eventually catch on?

    --
    "Imaginary solutions to real problems."
    1. Re:2000 do-it-yourself by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      Didn't Seymour Cray pioneer the concept?

    2. Re:2000 do-it-yourself by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Fluorinert is crazy expensive. A liter of the stuff costs around $440~$540
      Fluorinert made since with the Cray computers because they were already crazy expensive monsters.
      You can get recycled Fluorinert for cheaper, but you're still talking hundreds of dollars for the volume of liquid necessary to submerge a motherboard and provide a useable thermal mass.

      Mineral oil is a vastly cheaper alternative.
      Now that Intel has done R&D that satisfies their engineers, they can roll this out to the masses at a reasonable cost

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:2000 do-it-yourself by humanrev · · Score: 1

      You know what's the most interesting thing about your linked Slashdot article? It appears that in 2000, Slashdot didn't have Interesting/Insightful/Funny moderations, just numerical scores

      --
      Most people on Slashdot are fucking idiots.
    4. Re:2000 do-it-yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes he did, for the Cray 2.

  19. fluorinert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another, but somewhat expensive option is fluorinert. We used to use it for boards that would eventually be potted, but would arc in air. We could use mineral oil (but a dog to clean off the board for potting later) and fluorinert, which was better, but depending on the temp/voltage resistance needed could be helishly expensive

  20. That's my retirement grease! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Arrrgh!

  21. Perfect by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Funny

    Have you ever worked at a company where middle management could not have used daily bunches of fries with extra laxatives?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Perfect by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I always thought a but plug more appropriate.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  22. Cool cooling in a cooler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I keep my server in my refrigerator.

  23. Pff, that's so 2006. by conspirator23 · · Score: 2

    The first place I ran across the concept was Tom's Hardware, and you can still see the original article. "High Performance Computing" says Intel? Pish Tosh. Kids, you really can try this at home... but get a grown-up to assist you!

    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/strip-fans,1203.html

  24. Let's party like it's 1999 by Microlith · · Score: 2

    http://web.archive.org/web/19991006062047/http://www.accsdata.com/drffreeze/TestBox2.htm

    Sadly, all the pictures appear to have been lost.

    I remember this guy going through and dunking his systems in Mineral oil over a decade ago, back when I was in 11th grade. You know, back with the BP6 was amazing shit and slotkets were an essential overclocker's tool.

    1. Re:Let's party like it's 1999 by Tynin · · Score: 1

      Thanks for sharing this. I wish they retained pictures, but it still brought back memories.

  25. What about maintenance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who cringes at the thought of yanking a giant quad-processor card out of a tank of oil, dripping wet, then trying to coordinate the movement over a tupperware container (as to not make a mess on the floor) so I can place it on a desk covered in paper towels for servicing- only to get all my nice ESD safe tools covered in the same gunk, which will require a trip to the bathroom or kitchen to clean up afterwards?

    How do you even store one of these boards in a permanent fashion? Wash it down with de-ionized water? Stick it in the dishwasher? I can't imagine you just pop it out, dry it down with some sort of an ESD-friendly towel (assuming things like BGA chips are actually sealed around the edges, so crap doesn't get under them), then chuck it in a plastic container.

    I dunno. This seems like one of those marketing things that sounds fantastic on paper, until some dude has a data centre full of 40 racks that are all filled with oil (how heavy would that be?), and has to deal with the issues of swapping out parts on occasion. I bet that same dude isn't going to think oil filled computers were such a great idea. Even IBM isn't crazy enough to do this- their zSeries mainframes have some pretty insane cooling options, but none of them are full PCB-immersed cooling.

    -AC

  26. SGI was doing this a looong time ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if Intel acquired any of SGI's patent portfolio. I good friend of mine's brother was a ME at SGI and worked on all the exotic ways to dissipate heat, one of which was submersion in oil and other liquids. Nothing new here. Somebody go check on Cray and Rackspace and see what they're doing.

    1. Re:SGI was doing this a looong time ago... by moj0e · · Score: 1

      +1 to the parent. I used to work at SGI and, as you said, this is old news. One small note, unless rackspace is also doing something different, I believe you are talking about Rackable Systems intead of Rackspace.

      This might be the first time Intel is doing it with their HW though. If I recall correctly, SGI did it with their MIPS systems.

    2. Re:SGI was doing this a looong time ago... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      This might be the first time Intel is doing it with their HW though. If I recall correctly, SGI did it with their MIPS systems.

      They made water block cooling for Altix but I can't find any mention of immersion cooling. AFAIK the only computers sold in any notable quantity to feature immersion cooling are Crays.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  27. Wow your evaluating by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    something that was proven to be fine in 1985?

    sure it wasnt oil, it was an exotic chemical developed by 3M but the point still stands

      'We're evaluating how (immersion cooling) can change the way data centers are designed and operated,'

    its been proven on machines that produced much more waste heat than today 27 years ago in the cray 2

    not to mention countless people using oil to cool their high voltage transformers and overclocekd P4's, but yay, GO Intel, grats on the prior art, obious patent in the near future

    sigh

    1. Re:Wow your evaluating by afidel · · Score: 1

      The cray2 didn't use that much more power than todays high density systems, 195kw in about the same floorspace as four racks, which is inline with high density designs of today. I'd imagine that's why we're looking at similar solutions.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:Wow your evaluating by Sepodati · · Score: 1

      Of course it works fine and has been done before, but the fact that it's not heavily used (or used at all?) in data centers means the evaluation is valid.

  28. compartmentalization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you're assuming that they will submerse the entire rack in one vat of oil. if they instead do each unit level in its own vat with lines for circulation, you could shut off that unit, drain it and swap the offending blade. might add 10 minutes to the whole ordeal. the oil can be rinsed off in a parts cleaner like you pick up at harbor freight, using odorless mineral spirits or the like.

    1. Re:compartmentalization by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      the oil can be rinsed off in a parts cleaner like you pick up at harbor freight, using odorless mineral spirits or the like.

      I can't wait to see data centers try to get permitting for this shit.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  29. Why don't they put datacenters in cold places? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

    I've always wondered - Why aren't cold places full of datacenters? Just pump the air in from outside. Yakutsk (well known to anyone who plays Risk) is a city that gets down to -50C in the winter, or something like that. In the summer it rarely gets above +20C. You'd figure there'd be a booming business building datacenters in these places.

    1. Re:Why don't they put datacenters in cold places? by symbolset · · Score: 1

      They do. There is considerable expansion in Canadian datacenters right now, and I believe Greenland too. Latencies can be an issue, but for some things like compute clouds it's not a concern. Ambient cooling is making big strides, as is datacenter thermal energy recovery. If you throw off heat it's possible to use it for other industrial uses, to heat human spaces, to melt the ice on streets and sidewalks and so on.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    2. Re:Why don't they put datacenters in cold places? by Funk_dat69 · · Score: 1

      Dew point. Colder than that and you have to deal with condensation.

      Oil works well, but current solutions work with total immersion and that's a freakin mess. And seeing the heatsink capacity of water is higher to begin with, warm water cooling is a much more practical solution.

      --
      FUNK!
    3. Re:Why don't they put datacenters in cold places? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Cold arctic air is often dry. And if you must extract humidity even lower, the compressors aren't going to have to work as hard due to the difference in Delta T. Either way, hosting data centers in colder climate is better than someplace in the sub tropics.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:Why don't they put datacenters in cold places? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      You must have missed the last six months worth of news stories about Facebook's selection of their new datacenter. Not only is the year-round temp ~60F, but it's right next door to a series of giant hydroelectric dams in one of the wettest regions of North America.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    5. Re:Why don't they put datacenters in cold places? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Dew point. Colder than that and you have to deal with condensation.

      Nope.

      There's a very small datacentre in Cambridge that I've been in. It's cooled primarily by external air induction. Cambridge is by no means super-cold: it hovers around zero in winter, occasionally getting colder, but generally it's very mild. Nevertheless, it's still too cold for servers. In the cold months, air is partially recirculated to keep the temperature stable and warm. In hot months, evapouritive cooling is sometimes used to keep the temperature down. This is mainly for the benefit of the operators. Computers are prefectly capable of surviving air inducted at 30C, even hotter, as the high density ones (quad socket, 1U) generally have a temperature gradient of 30C internally. The computers would survive, but the air-blast at the back would be 60C which is unbearably hot.

      Once you hit 15 degrees C, the fans and disks start to die quite rapidly, which is before condensation becomes a problem.

      Besides, either way, you're taking in cold air and warming it up which doesn't generally cause condensation.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    6. Re:Why don't they put datacenters in cold places? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      This has been my question as well. There are 2 North Pole of Cold locations in Yakutia/Sakha Republic @ Verkhoyansk and Oymyakon. So put in as many Itaniums or Xeons or whatever hot CPU that one wants - in fact, have as many CPUs that one wants out there. Unlike in Antarctica, those places would have the electricity to run, and can house the data centers.

      Aside from that, one could have data centers in Alaska or Northern Canada - say Ellesmere Island.

  30. Q: What's the best way to get heat out of a CPU? by symbolset · · Score: 1

    A: Don't put it in.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  31. raising the most important question: by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    Do you want fries with that?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:raising the most important question: by InterGuru · · Score: 1

      If you're in Britain you want a computer with efficient chips.

    2. Re:raising the most important question: by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      there's something fishy about your comment

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  32. Re:Here come the FUCKING SHILLS by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

    Then go somewhere else, dipshit. As I recall from the minutes of our last meeting, the Nerd Mafia aren't forcing anyone to read /. against their will yet.

  33. New problem by stox · · Score: 1

    Floor loading. How much is a rack of oil filled servers going to weigh?

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
  34. what's old is new again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cray used to do this.
    http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cray-2

  35. Is it liquid? A lot of cars have sodium ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    inserts in the valves for better heat transfer. That's near water and air and gasoline! Apparently for disposal you're supposed to drill a hole in them and drop them in a bucket of water.

  36. Raised Flooring by MDMurphy · · Score: 2

    I spent most of the 80's working on flight simulators that had rows of cabinets on raised flooring. One sim was supposed to be at 70F and the temp was usually so stable that if it was up more than a few degrees we could tell by feel and smell as soon as we walked in the room.

    By shear luck I worked on simulators in Las Vegas, New Mexico and South Korea, all places that in the summer you really wouldn't want to be working outside. The constant temp during working hours was great ( though I think it made me more of a wimp for temp extremes when I went outside ) Thinking about the oil immersion and what I'd guess would be warmer ambient temps in computer rooms is a little sad. It was the extra cool computer rooms that I worked in that added to the appeal of my job back then.

    1. Re:Raised Flooring by Alioth · · Score: 1

      You don't know anything about Redifon simulators? If so, there is a broken classic Trident 3 simulator of that era in need of repair...

      http://www.flickr.com/photos/neil_lomax/sets/72157624752599289/

      The website's a bit buggered up, but the owner can be contacted via: http://hs121trident.co.uk/G-AWZQ.php

  37. Two birds with one stone by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

    After the oil has been heated up by all those processors, pipe it to nearby fast food restaurants to cook French fries and all those other delicious, fattening foods! Yum!

    1. Re:Two birds with one stone by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Has anyone ever tried cooking w/ Silicone oil, as opposed to Canola or other vegetable oils?

    2. Re:Two birds with one stone by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I would imagine the results would be similar to this.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  38. 1998 by slackware+3.6 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And I was using a mineral oil bath (bar frige guts were used to keep the oil cool) to cool my over clocked Pentium. HDD, optical drives and power supply sat on a grate at the top of the coleman cooler and every thing else was submerged. I even did it with distilled water for a bit but it was to hard to keep the water clean.

  39. hard drives? by amoeba1911 · · Score: 1

    "hard drives [...] withstood the oil just fine"

    I'd like to know if they used off-the-shelf hard drives for this. I find it hard to believe that a hard drive would work in oil. They usually have breathing holes, wouldn't oil get into the drive and interfere with the moving parts?

    1. Re:hard drives? by jibjibjib · · Score: 1

      Hard drives need to be sealed to be immersed, as mentioned at http://gigaom.com/cloud/intel-immerses-its-servers-in-oil-and-they-like-it/ .

  40. So.... by lightknight · · Score: 1

    So, still haven't licked that optical chip problem yet?

    --
    I am John Hurt.
  41. You can use Air to cool 35KW why bother with oil? by killmode · · Score: 0

    Oil immersion works, but why bother?
    99.99% of datacenters still rely on moving cool air through hot servers to cool them. in some instances you could make a case for mineral oil bath cooling. if you want to push the envelope of server cooling, try using our Vertically cooled servers. www.cirrascale.com. we believe that hot air naturally wants to rise.
    we pack 72 18"tall 1U wide servers in one rack, or 96 13" tall servers. 10's of thousands deployed
    we've been able to cool over 30KW of load in one rack with Air on a non raised floor datacenter. We've been doing it for years, and we don't void warranties to do it.
    "excuse me, Mr. Dell/HP/IBM service center person... this server isn't working.. can you take a look at it please"
    "Be happy to... Um uh, why is it in a plastic ziplock bag?"
    "oh that's to keep the mineral oil from dripping on your service lab floor"
        RMA declined!, Warranty Null & Void!
    mark.skinner@cirrascale.com

  42. Re:Here come the FUCKING SHILLS by ThePeices · · Score: 1

    GOD I hate this fucking site

    You called?

    Oh yes, one would think that most geeks would be quite happy to watch shills fuck, as long as they are pretty enough.

    Please close the door after you hand in your geek card.

  43. Re:You can use Air to cool 35KW why bother with oi by scheme · · Score: 1

    Oil immersion works, but why bother? 99.99% of datacenters still rely on moving cool air through hot servers to cool them. in some instances you could make a case for mineral oil bath cooling. if you want to push the envelope of server cooling, try using our Vertically cooled servers. www.cirrascale.com. we believe that hot air naturally wants to rise. we pack 72 18"tall 1U wide servers in one rack, or 96 13" tall servers. 10's of thousands deployed we've been able to cool over 30KW of load in one rack with Air on a non raised floor datacenter. We've been doing it for years, and we don't void warranties to do it. "excuse me, Mr. Dell/HP/IBM service center person... this server isn't working.. can you take a look at it please" "Be happy to... Um uh, why is it in a plastic ziplock bag?" "oh that's to keep the mineral oil from dripping on your service lab floor" RMA declined!, Warranty Null & Void! mark.skinner@cirrascale.com

    Sure you can cool that with air but if you're adding an extra 50-60% in energy costs to cool it and using immersion cooling will only add 4% in energy costs, that'll certainly get people's attention. Add in reduced costs for CRACS and other related equipment and immersion cooling looks more viable. Finally, if your OEM provides equipment that is spec for immersion cooling, I'm pretty sure that they'll provide warranty support for it as well.

    --
    "When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it
  44. mental arithmetic by dpletche · · Score: 1

    Glancing through the headlines with divided attention, I mentally juxtaposed the headings of two successive stories, yielding "Iran embraces oil immersion for critics".

    1. Re:mental arithmetic by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      As funny as that sounds that wouldn't be news.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  45. Re:You can use Air to cool 35KW why bother with oi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > using immersion cooling will only add 4% in energy costs

    How so? The servers don't need suddenly less power (except a few percent for the now missing fans) and they still produce heat, which one has ultimately get rid off. The individual server might need less energy, but the data center will not.

    I see advantages for overclocking (quicker heat transfer), but fail to see the green aspect. Not to speak of how to get rid of the oil once it is contaminated or the mess, if there would be a leak.

  46. Re:You can use Air to cool 35KW why bother with oi by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    you can pack the chips in higher density with oil, with shorter datapaths.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  47. Re:You can use Air to cool 35KW why bother with oi by Interfacer · · Score: 1

    It is greener because
    a) you don't have to cool entire rooms, just the servers. So there is much less heat dissipation.
    b) heat transfer from metal to liquid and then liquid to metal is more efficient than having a heat transfer from metal to air, and then air to metal.

  48. Re:wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it is not distilled water you want, it is deionized water: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purified_water

    distilled water is still conductive so either you were very lucky to not fry your computer or you are lying about it.

  49. A new career opportunity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, well, well. Looks like I can get into computing business with this hydraulic engineering degree after all.

  50. Re:80s No actually the 50s by Required+Snark · · Score: 1
    The IBM 7030 (Stretch) initially shipped with oil cooled magnetic core memory int 1957-58. The oil temperature control had both heating and cooling capabilities.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_7302

    This was in the days when IBM employees all wore white shirts and ties, and I head stories that the techs would not bother to roll up their sleeves when they worked on these units, because they knew that they would get soaked in oil not matter what they did.

    --
    Why is Snark Required?
  51. Re:wrong by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    distilled water is still conductive so either you were very lucky to not fry your computer or you are lying about it.

    Distilled water is not meaningfully conductive, but it is still corrosive. Deionized water is not. However, water reacts with itself to form ions, and so DI water rapidly becomes normal water.

    The obvious solution is to include a distiller in the loop :)

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  52. Meh by crossword.bob · · Score: 1

    Been immersing chips in oil for years. Part of the reason I'm the shape I am.

  53. Re:wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Distilled water is not meaningfully conductive, but it is still corrosive. Deionized water is not. However, water reacts with itself to form ions, and so DI water rapidly becomes normal water.

    even if parent is getting double-distilled water, i'm not sure i would trust its purity to be enough...

    The obvious solution is to include a distiller in the loop :)

    or you add a deionization step to the loop instead, since the process is cheaper than distillation : )

  54. seen this in action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The company I work at is currently testing this exact same setup and it is some fairly slick stuff. The cost to retrofit a normal raised floor datacenter to use this would be cost prohibitive though I think.

  55. Putting computers in oil by the_arrow · · Score: 1

    People have been putting their computers in mineral oil for years, clocking their rigs to numbers that would be impressive even today. Must have been well over ten years since I read about it here on /. for the first time.

    --
    / The Arrow
    "How lovely you are. So lovely in my straightjacket..." - Nny
  56. How often should we change the oil? by trevc · · Score: 0

    So we have to take our servers to Jiffy Lube every 6 months for an oil and filter change? Will they try to up sell us while we are there? More memory, faster processor, change the electrolytic capacitor electrolite?

  57. Re:wrong by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    or you add a deionization step to the loop instead, since the process is cheaper than distillation : )

    Well, you're still going to need a filter, and that means a pump that can overcome it. Perhaps you need both. What do you need for DI, electrodes and a power supply?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  58. It's only been 27 years since the first one by garyebickford · · Score: 1

    It's about time dep't:
    The Cray-II was immersed in a tank of Fluorinert (type of Freon). This allowed circuit boards to be stacked eight high in a single module:

    Six months later Cray had his "eureka" moment. He called the main engineers together for a meeting and presented a new solution to the problem. Instead of making one larger circuit board, each "card" would instead consist of a 3-D stack of eight, connected together in the middle of the boards using pins sticking up from the surface (known as "pogos" or "z-pins"). The cards were packed right on top of each other, so the resulting stack was only about 3 inches high. With this sort of density there was no way any conventional air-cooled system would work; there was too little room for air to flow between the ICs. Instead the system would be immersed in a tank of a new inert liquid from 3M, Fluorinert. The cooling liquid was forced sideways through the modules under pressure, and the flow rate was roughly one inch per second. The heated liquid was cooled using chilled water heat exchangers and returned to the main tank. Work on the new design started in earnest in 1982, several years after the original start date.

    --
    It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
  59. Of course it's slick.. by cheros · · Score: 1

    .. it should be with oil :)

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  60. Re:wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Distilled water is not meaningfully conductive, but it is still corrosive. Deionized water is not. However, water reacts with itself to form ions, and so DI water rapidly becomes normal water.

    Pure water always has ions: H+ and OH-. Deionized water is less pure than distilled water. Only the mineral ions (salts) are removed.

  61. Here's a better way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://powerelectronics.com/thermal_management/thermal_management_products/thin-cavity-cooling-of-electronic-circuitry-0629/

  62. Re:wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    High purity deionized water can be more corrosive than distilled water. I work with some water cooled equipment, that includes some immersed high voltage parts, that works fine with grocery-store quality distilled water and a small deionizing filter. But the filter is on a bypass, as otherwise the resistivity of the water sky-rockets beyond the warnings and limits set by the equipment with risks about damaging metal components. A simple water resistivity meter is used to keep an eye on the resistivity and to keep it within the right range (not too high or too low) by just controlling how much flows through the deionizing filter. Typically very little goes through the filter and it hasn't need replacement in years.

  63. Re:wrong by slackware+3.6 · · Score: 1

    Umm I did fry my computer $3000 down the crapper. I did manage to get it to work for a month that is why I switched to mineral oil. BTW my parents had a distiller so it was easy to get the water.