Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Debuts Kindle Paperwhite, Kindle Fire HD In 2 Sizes

Nerval's Lobster writes "Amazon used a Sept. 6 event in California to debut a range of products, including a front-lit [not back-lit, as originally reported] Kindle e-reader with a higher-resolution screen, an updated Kindle Fire, and the new Kindle Fire HD in two screen sizes. First, Bezos showed off a new version of the Kindle e-reader, the Kindle Paperwhite, complete with a front-lit, higher-resolution screen (221 pixels-per-inch and 25 percent more contrast, according to Amazon). The device weighs 7.5 ounces and is 9.1mm thin; battery life is rated at eight weeks, and the screen brightness is adjustable. He then showed off the updated Kindle Fire, before moving to the Kindle Fire HD, which features a choice of 7-inch or 8.9-inch screens, dual stereo speakers with Dolby Digital Plus, two antennas for better Wi-Fi pickup, and a Texas Instruments OMAP 4470 processor (which Bezos claimed could out-perform the Tegra 3). The Kindle Fire HD's 7-inch version will retail for $199 and ship Sept. 14, while the 8.9-inch version will cost $299 and ship Nov. 20. An 8.9-inch, 4G LTE-enabled version with 32GB storage will be available starting Nov. 20 for $499, paired with a $49.99-a-year data plan."

74 of 307 comments (clear)

  1. Like the multi-user features by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Kindle has a nice idea of how the device can be used in a family, where the parents can control time spent by kids.

    It'll be interesting to see if Apple has anything up and comping to address this same problem, until now they have kind of ignore this.

    I think Amazon could do very well with the new Fire, and also the new PaperWhite kindle - that's the first e-ink Kindle that appeals to me, the others were just too low contrast for me. And even iPad owners could easily be enticed to buy a cheaper e-ink Kindle... that could well help cement them as the leader in e-Books (not that they were not already pretty cemented).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Like the multi-user features by Robadob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would have thought, apples plan is that every user in the house owns their own iDevice, rather than sharing them.

    2. Re:Like the multi-user features by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That probably is Apple's plan. It was easy enough to carry forth when there were no good competitors. But instead of getting each of two kids an iPad, a single Kindle Fire for both is viable... it'll be interesting to see uptake on this vs. Apple's plan, or if Apple decides that in fact they should think about more of a multi-user approach.

      Apple is even sort of well positioned to take up multi-user stuff if they want to thanks to iCloud, each kid could have a different iCloud account and the device could easily switch home directories based on the current iCloud user setting. They just don't make that easy to do right now (I think it would re-sync the device every time you switched users).

      Indeed, Amazon could probably not have managed this this family thing without the Whispersync stuff in place themselves...

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:Like the multi-user features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You've met any siblings? If one wants to do something, the other will want to do the same thing, just because the other does it. Time share plan is a good idea in theory... practice on the other hand ... not so much.

    4. Re:Like the multi-user features by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

      That's a great point but it comes up hard against the economic reality of many families not being able to afford an iPad per kid.

      I know a number of families that make kids share an iPad, it builds character after all. But with a multi-user approach a brother could not screw with his sisters games.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    5. Re:Like the multi-user features by kybred · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But instead of getting each of two kids an iPad, a single Kindle Fire for both is viable...

      I'm guessing that you don't have two (or more) kids. Share is typically not in their vocabulary.

    6. Re:Like the multi-user features by RocketRabbit · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's because of shitty parenting. Proper parenting results in sharing. Shitty parenting results in kids that are rutted and who simply grow, like a cow or a vegetable. Proper parenting involves raising children so that they understand the concepts of sharing, respect, playing nice, etc.

    7. Re:Like the multi-user features by jabelli · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you had the rubber case in the first place, you wouldn't have had the kids.

      Is "Thick rubber case" the modern version of Twain's barrel?

    8. Re:Like the multi-user features by RocketRabbit · · Score: 2

      No, I didn't want to impugn the parenting skills of cattle in comparison to the majority of human parents these days. That'd be downright silly. My apologies.

    9. Re:Like the multi-user features by Cinder6 · · Score: 2

      You've met any siblings? If one wants to do something, the other will want to do the same thing, just because the other does it. Time share plan is a good idea in theory... practice on the other hand ... not so much.

      Talk about a first-world problem. "I had to get little Timmy his own iPad because he and little Johnny were always fighting over the other one." Heaven forbid kids should learn to share. (Strongly resisting the obvious "back when I was a kid" anecdote. I'm only partially successful.)

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    10. Re:Like the multi-user features by jackbird · · Score: 2

      Not true. My one year-old has learned to scream "share!" as she rips a toy out of her older brother's hand....

  2. Re:Price on data plan is suspect by alen · · Score: 3, Informative

    250MB per month before you have to pay more

  3. Re:But it's not the google experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I want to feel warm and fuzzy and covered in the goodness of complete googleness

    I picked up a Fire as a cheap 'Android' tablet while visiting the US. Once I got it back to the UK, it was pretty hopeless. No Amazon Marketplace over here and the odd hardware profile means most apps turn up their nose at it, even with sideloaded Google Market. I will be looking at the Nexus 7 or similar when I come to replace it. Sorry Amazon, nice try, but your walled garden isn't for me.

  4. Re:Paper White!! Wait, what? by crankyspice · · Score: 5, Informative

    I saw paperwhite and was hoping this was a resurgence for E-Ink. Sadly no, it's not.

    It's e-Ink, at least according to http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/06/kindle-paperwhite/. It would have to be, to have an 8 week runtime.

    --
    geek. lawyer.
  5. Re:Backlit?! by Pahroza · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's NOT BACKLIT. Submitter wasn't paying attention. It's an illuminated display, you can turn it off.

  6. Not suspect, that was the highlight by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    They made a big deal in a comparison slide about how the data plan was just $50 for a year of 256mb/month data. I believe that was even global!

    That's a pretty impressive arrangement.

    I do wonder if it will be undercut a bit by shared data plans the carriers are just starting to offer. Bringing a 4G iPad into a home that already has two iPhones means only $10/month extra device fee... that's still $120 though.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Not suspect, that was the highlight by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

      not so much.

      on my phone, i use 250MB in 3 days or so. i just checked my nexus 7, and it has used 2GB is a week

      Sure, but at home the device will mostly be on WiFi.

      256MB/month is actually quite a lot of data if you are mostly around WiFi.

      you are SOL of you have ideas of downloading music or movies or streaming anything or playing online games.

      Music or movies you would have downloaded at home. Online games (especially online tablet games) do not usually use up THAT much bandwidth.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    2. Re:Not suspect, that was the highlight by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

      It also means reading state is properly synced all the time.

      I have an iPhone, without trying especially to conserve data my cellular usage is around 300 MB/month. That's using maps, using the web when out and about, checking email. 256MB is a lot more useful than you are making out especially for more casual data users that are mostly reading.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  7. Re:Are you sure it's not e-ink? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    it's e-ink with a "fiber optic" layer that lights from above.

  8. Backlit? Frontlit? by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

    I think the terms you are looking for are frontlit and thick. Still, I'm a bit disappointed that the DX is such an ugly stepchild. Certainly there's a market for a reasonably priced larger format e-reader.

    I'm thinking about returning my recently acquired kindle gen 4 since I may not get to use it much in the next month, and a built in light is a major feature.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  9. Re:But it's not the google experience by cpu6502 · · Score: 2

    Does Google include 10-20 dollar books that can be borrowed for free? Or Fantasy & Science magazine for a mere $12/year? Or e-ink that is easy on the eyes? Or free 3G web surfing? My kindle has all of that.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  10. Re:Paper White!! Wait, what? by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Was e-ink ever gone ? No LCD beats it for long reading sessions.

    I didn't find that to be the case for previous e-ink kindles, the lower contrast was like looking at dirty paper and bothered me enough I preferred LCD's for hours of reading.

    The new Paperwhite display looks like a winner to me though, finally realizing the full potential of electronic paper along with a great lighting solution. I think it could be the first e-ink I really do find preferable to an LCD, and it has a decent PPI for rendering text.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  11. I read "Paperweight" instead of "Paperwhite" by joelsanda · · Score: 4, Funny

    I read "Paperweight" instead of "Paperwhite"

    --
    The Luddites were ahead of their time.
  12. Re:All this technology... by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sales tax is not state by state, it is county by county or in some states town by town.

    I have been involved in projects to do this and it is a huge PITA. State sales tax is easy, town or county are hard since zip codes and other such normal address data do not tell you if they are within a town/county or not.

  13. Re:But it's not the google experience by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

    and a nice horribly slow refresh rate, no games, no netflix, or any other useful application.

    Eink is not a tablet replacement.

  14. OMAP 4470 can't do shit by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

    OMAP 4470 "Can outperform the Tegra 3"? The Tegra 3 has 1.2-1.7 GHz QUAD CORE ARM Cortex-A9 application-optimized cores with NEON. The OMAP 4470 has 1.5-1.8GHz DUAL CORE ARM Cortex-A9 application optimized cores with NEON. You know that means the slowest Tegra has 1/3 more processing power available than the fastest OMAP 4470, and its single-core speed is 2/3 that of the OMAP? If you went with the Tegra 3 T33 used in the Asus T700 at 1.7GHz, you'd have 95% of the single core speed and 90% more total processing power available.

    There is no way you can outperform the Tegra 3.

    1. Re:OMAP 4470 can't do shit by Bryansix · · Score: 2

      I know its 2012 and all but not everything is multi-threaded for quad core optimization. The faster clockrate may in fact yield better results in some cases.

    2. Re:OMAP 4470 can't do shit by msauve · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're like the NASCAR fan who can't understand why their favorite car could never be competitive in Formula 1.

      You're focused exclusively on processing speed, you've totally ignored power consumption, display functions, and surrounding support chips. As I said, you don't understand systems, or the difference between raw speed and performance. If Amazon says the OMAP provides better performance, I believe them, since they have to take very much more into account than just MIPS.

      Oh, and you've gotten your facts very wrong. The OMAP 4470 is a 4 core processor, and the Tegra is a 5 core processor. The OMAP, in addition to the 2 A9 cores, it has 2 M3 cores, which consume only 32 uW/MHz (a regular A9 core consumes ~300 uW/MHz at its most efficient) . This is very likely why it outperforms the Tegra in this application.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    3. Re:OMAP 4470 can't do shit by Tr3vin · · Score: 2

      You're forgetting the SGX554, clock for clock it's twice as powerful as the GeForce ULP.

      THIS. In mobile, the GPU tends to be a bit more important than raw CPU power. This is because we are doing a lot of pixel pushing to render the final UI. On something like the Tegra 2, the UI could be slow because the fill-rate on Tegra 2 was comparatively low. A SOC with a better GPU but worse CPU would feel much smoother when navigating the UI. It is not often that you are maxing out a core, let alone four of them.

  15. Re:8 weeks instead of 2 months battery? by oji-sama · · Score: 5, Informative

    Interesting change in wording. That means 56 days of reading 1-hour per day instead of 62 days. Meanwhile Barnes advertises "over 2 months" for their nooks.

    Are you quite sure?

    Barnes on Nook Glowlight:
    Read for over 1 month on a single charge with GlowLight on (based on a half hour of daily reading time)1 Read for over 2 months with GlowLight off (based on a half hour of daily reading time)1

    Amazon on Kindle Paperwhite:
    "So we worked on our power management — Kindle paperwhite can get eight weeks of battery life even with the light on.

    --
    It is what it is.
  16. Steve jobs would never have allowed this by alen · · Score: 3, Funny

    Steve jobs would never have allowed this to happen

    He would have had bezos killed by his secret ninja assassins a long time ago

    1. Re:Steve jobs would never have allowed this by swb · · Score: 5, Funny

      Bezos uploads a backup of himself daily to S3. You can't kill him, you can only return him to the last backup point.

      To kill Bezos, you have have to kill S3.

  17. Re:But it's not the google experience by dffuller · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nor is a tablet a suitable replacement for an Eink reader.

  18. Re:But it's not the google experience by Bryansix · · Score: 2

    The Kindle app is in the Google Play marketplace. I don't know what this has to do with anything.

  19. Re:But it's not the google experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That is just a bizarre comparison. BBC is paid for by the *government*, Amazon is a private company. I don't see why a Kindle couldn't work perfectly outside the US.

  20. Re:Price on data plan is suspect by Anubis+IV · · Score: 3, Funny

    8MB of bandwidth per day ought to be enough for anybody. ;)

  21. Re:Price on data plan is suspect by Desler · · Score: 2

    You pay $20 per year to get 2GB of data each month?

  22. Re:But it's not the google experience by Jethro · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It is absolutely trivial to transform a Kindle Fire into a regular Android tablet. My mom did it. I got a refurb one specifically for that purpose. It is currently running Jelly Bean pretty smoothly.

    --


    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
  23. nope.jpg by wasabioss · · Score: 2

    In other words that's about twice as expensive as $20 for 2GB that I pay to my cell phone company.

    Your calculation is wrong, but even if your calculation was right, it would certainly not be the case. People don't use up to their limit all the time. $20 for 2GB, $10 for 1GB or $5 for 500MB or $1 for 100MB are certainly not the same plan. I would be super happy to have a $1 for 100MB, pretty upset with $10 for 1GB and feel ripped off with $100 for 10GB.

  24. Re:Backlit?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I watched the live presentation. It is a front lit display using a new technology to light the front of the display using nanoimprinted light channels in the glass. It acts like ambient light but it is not a backlight in any way shape or form. It also claims 8 weeks of battery life with the light on. I guess the closest thing you could call it is redirected side lighting? The live blog from gizmodo has a picture of the tech as it was show on the bigscreen. http://live.gizmodo.com/page5.html.

  25. No page turn buttons :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why why why Amazon? Pretty much everything about the new Kindle sounds great except for the lack of page turn buttons. I'm still using my 3rd generation Kindle and I'd love to upgrade it to a higher contrast screen with built in lighting, but touchscreen-only navigation is a killer. It makes one handed reading more difficult and uncomfortable, will cause screen smudges, and will be nearly impossible to operate with gloves.

    1. Re:No page turn buttons :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I thought the same thing until I actually started using the touch. I had the previous generation before and it got stolen. I thought the lack of page turn buttons would bother me, but after about an hour worth of reading I got used to it and like it just fine. What I really don't like about the touch is the light on Amazon's lighted case, you have to hold it down at an angle so it doesn't shine right in your eyes (probably because it was designed to light up the Amazon logo at the top of the Kindle), the light on the previous generation case was much better. Since this new one has a built in frontlight, if they did a good job with it that'll solve that problem and make it worth it to me to upgrade solely for the light.

    2. Re:No page turn buttons :( by coljac · · Score: 2

      This was my reaction exactly. However I've never tried a Kindle touch, and imagined there was some sort of swipe gesture required. I just had a look on youtube though and it seems pretty tolerable.

      --
      Everyone knows that damage is done to the soul by bad motion pictures. -Pope Pius XI
    3. Re:No page turn buttons :( by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2

      I own a Kindle Touch. You tap the screen to navigate pages; The left-most 1/5 of the screen is for back a page, the rest is forward a page. You can easily hook the right hand side of the screen with the base of your thumb, and use the tip to skip pages, or with a decent case you just rest it on your knee and tap when you want. Pressing near the top brings up the menu. Swipe up or down to navigate through chapters.

      I've not used a non-touch Kindle, but I can't imagine it being any easier than the Kindle Touch. I would like a little more consistency from the screen; Sometimes it takes a couple of taps to register, sometimes it will skip a page if I stare at it hard enough, but it's so easy to move back again it's hardly an issue.

      I love it, but YMMV as always.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  26. Re:But it's not the google experience by nospam007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "My kindle has all of that."

    Mine too. I own all the models but the touch has a problem in country life.
    Each time a fly lands on it, there's a page change, back or forward, depending on the landing zone.
    Sometimes the fly also looks-up a word in the dictionary.

  27. Re:But it's not the google experience by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually it is. I use one in that fashion regularly.

  28. Re:But it's not the google experience by WaywardGeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Amazon's walled garden is the #1 strength of the Nexus 7. Also, the latest Android is nice. I have the Amazon Kindle app, the B&N Nook app, Google's Play Books app, and of course an audio-book player which is what I use most often. I was wondering what Amazon could offer that would make me wish I had a Kindle Fire HD. Looks like nothing.

    On the positive side, the $300 price point for the larger device is eye-opening, though I'm pretty happy with my 7". My family keeps stealing it, and my wife travels with it, even though she has an iPad. The Nexus 7 is simply a better e-book reader than any current iPad.

    --
    Celebrate failure, and then learn from it - Nolan Bushnell
  29. Re:But it's not the google experience by Artifakt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What's really weird about your counterpoint is: There was a time in the 80's and 90's when the US donated launch vehicles to put up BBC's satelites over various tropical locations such as the Carribean, and the treaties that made this possible spelled out that US citizens who could get line of sight to those birds could legally access the programming. Living in Fla. at the time, I was one of the people who did it. Later, i was told by a US government source that they never meant to have that knowledge become generally public, and actually wrote the BBC to confirm it was as I remembered. BBC reps actually sent me a government address to contact if I wanted more information and confirmed that was their understanding as well, so I have no idea who the US government was acting on behalf of.

    --
    Who is John Cabal?
  30. Re:But it's not the google experience by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 5, Informative

    The new kindle paperwhite includes a page light, so this is no longer true.

  31. Re:But it's not the google experience by hawguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >>>Sorry Amazon, nice try, but your walled garden isn't for me.

    One could say the same about the BBC and their "walled garden". Why on earth did you think you could use an amazon tablet outside of its home country? I certainly don't expect to be able to hear/watch BBC outside of the UK.

    Because I paid for the tablet, but I don't pay for the BBC?

  32. Re:But it's not the google experience by MozeeToby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As has been reported recently on Slashdot (and known to people with circadian rhythm disorders for much longer) staring at a backlit screen at night can seriously screw up your sleep schedule. Not to mention many people have more eyestrain from backlit screens than non-emissive ones. For many people, a tablet is a terrible replacement for an eInk ereader. Does make me wonder if this Paperwhite will have the same problems though.

  33. Re:But it's not the google experience by Coppit · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hold long will the (hu)man hold down the proud black fly?

  34. Re:All this technology... by Solandri · · Score: 2

    This really needs to be handled at the Federal government level. The way it's done right now is ludicrous. You have companies which purport to provide updated tax tables. They have to monitor every municipal government in the country for any new or changes to the sales taxes. Basically the equivalent of polling in CompSci. The thing is, none of them will indemnify you against errors they make. If they screw up and you've been charging the too little tax for a week, you have to pay for the shortfall, not them.

    The Federal government should makes a sales tax website. States, counties, and cities report their sales/use tax rates to this website. Businesses can then download the latest tax tables from the site every day. If a local government fails to update their tax rate, then they're responsible for losing out on any uncollected taxes. If a business fails to update its tax tables, then it's responsible for any uncollected taxes. No shifting of liability, no stupid polling, no duplicated work.

  35. Re:But it's not the google experience by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

    That study did not seem very complete. I would bet on a strong placebo effect.

    Eyestrain from backlit screens is another one of those bullshit conditions. People spend 8 hours looking into an LCD, then go home and spend another couple hours looking at a bigger LCD. No one ever complains about the monitor or the tv, but if its a book they say "oh noes lcd will burn the eyeballs out of your sockets!!".

  36. Still nothing for college textbooks. by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Kindle DX2 please. 11 inch screen with this new screen tech please.. I know a LOT of people that would kill for an A4 size screen.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Still nothing for college textbooks. by wiedzmin · · Score: 2

      Yes, and this time actually support it please. My original Kindle DX feels about as abandoned as they get - not a single update, unlike the smaller, non-premium cost models, to browser functionality, only one freaking image per periodical... it's ridiculous. I will not buy another Kindle until I see assurance that it isn't going to get ignored, support wise, the same way the original DX has been.

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
  37. Re:WAY too little too late. by Lumpy · · Score: 3

    "Why would I give up one walled garden to go to another? With Android you have choice."

    With the properly chosen android device you have choice. Please dont sugar coat it, the Kindle Fire is android and it has NO choice unless you hack it. In fact the only tablets I know of that give you freedom of choice is the nexus 7 from google. Unlocked bootloader and pure Jellybean os with no crap installed. Unlike the Xoom.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  38. Re:The crossover by mikestew · · Score: 2

    And if you like the eInk Kindle why would you not start to consider the Fire?

    Because if I want an eye-searing backlit reader to use after the lights go out, I'll use my wife's iPad 3 which has a much better DPI than the Fire. Horses for courses, and for reading I'll use my e-ink Kindle whenever I can (and maybe I'll get the new Paperweight to solve the after-dark problem). When I want to use a tablet for tablety stuff, the Fire is not my first choice.

  39. Re:All this technology... by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

    The tax rates available from the state generally is only updated once a year, and not at the same time as the county/town. This means you have to buy a subscription to a service to handle this, and they well may not be 100% up to date either. Then you have to check if the user in the county/town whatever, for practical reasons they means asking like you have seen.

    Hard is the wrong word though, it is not a hard problem just one you have to solve over and over. The real problem is when you find out you did it wrong for a location, which will happen. Then your lawyer decides what you do about it.

  40. Re:But it's not the google experience by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

    I am not a homosexual, not sure why you would think I was. I have some gay friends I can introduce you to if you are looking for a date.

    I own only 1 apple device, a macbook air running linux. I despise the iOS devices.

    I have a nook, which has an lcd and it works great.

  41. Possibly yes by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Wow, they can use the device to make sure kids read?

    The parental controls could in theory, allocate the amount of time permitted between apps and books.

    I have no idea if they do, but they could.

    That doesn't technically make them read but reading on a tablet might be "cool" enough even a kid that did not otherwise want to read would do so.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  42. [citation needed] by DragonWriter · · Score: 3

    The U.S. doesn't allow exports of U.S. copyrighted works w/o permission of the owner.....

    Huh. I'm looking at Title 17 of the US Code, and nowhere among the exclusive rights of copyright holders is "export" listed. So, I'm thinking, some kind of evidence supporting this claim would be nice.

    and the UK government protects its local artists/authors by not allowing imports unless registered under UK copyrights.

    This would suggest that the UK doesn't allow imports of anything that could be subject to copyright unless it had a registered UK copyright. Aside from the fact that this would be impossible to enforce (given the scope of things that are subject to copyright protection and how impossible it would be to verify that for every import it would apply to), this is, like the last, a pretty extraordinary claim for which some evidence would be welcome.

    1. Re:[citation needed] by DragonWriter · · Score: 2

      Amazon is not allowed to broadcast videos outside of North America per the contract it signed with the Hollywood company, and as enforced by U.S. copyright law.

      It is extraordinarily misleading to claim that this supports the claim that the US prohibits exports without the copyright holders permission. No "export" -- which would require a tangible good -- is involved here, and the only reason that copyright law might be involved (as opposed to contract law) is because what you call "broadcast" is actually electronic copying, not "export".

      If you had a legally-purchased tangible object containing a copy of the data, the copyright holder's lack of permission to export it wouldn't be given any weight in the US.

  43. Re:But it's not the google experience by lexman098 · · Score: 2

    LED screens don't have a backlight, so you can turn down the brightness and use dim white text on a pure black background. No e-ink required.

  44. Re:But it's not the google experience by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, it has a light, but does it do PDF annotation? Can you zoom and navigate and crop PDFs easily? No.

    The primary use for an e-ink reader is to read novels. PDF is not a suitable format for that. Although the Sony reader has the features you ask for, for those of us who don't read children's books they are not necessary. Technical reference works is not really what it's designed for either, but it's quite adequate, and far better than the tablet I left at home.

    Look, if you don't read novels e-ink is not for you. Get a tablet for your games, browsing, magazines and illustrated PDFs. We who *do* read novels are quite happy with our readers. BTW, I also have a tiny clip-on reading light which works perfectly well, but I almost never bring it because I don't need it.

    --
    Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
  45. Re:But it's not the google experience by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 2

    "My kindle has all of that."

    Mine too. I own all the models but the touch has a problem in country life.
    Each time a fly lands on it, there's a page change, back or forward, depending on the landing zone.
    Sometimes the fly also looks-up a word in the dictionary.

    At one time an ant highlighted the words "advocate leniency" on a page in my Sony reader. Maybe those insects have more communication skills than we give them credit for :)

    --
    Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
  46. Re:But it's not the google experience by Cinder6 · · Score: 2

    I have the GlowLight model. B&N's hardware is nicer than Amazon's, as is their software, but their actual ebooks leave something to be desired. I've encountered a lot more formatting errors than I did on the Kindle, and even several books that didn't let me change the font. I actually had to resort to stripping the DRM from the EPUBs (or just downloading pirate copies of books I bought), unzipping them, and manually adding the font files and editing the manifest, CSS, etc. It's a damn pain, and the reason why I preordered the Paperwhite.

    I bought the Nook in part because I wanted to support someone who wasn't Amazon, and I don't want this to become a market dominated by one player. Honestly, though, Amazon's doing a better job. This isn't even getting into the poor syncing between the Nook and the iOS app, or the fact that sideloading is more difficult than on the Kindle (no syncing there, and you can't sideload into the iOS app).

    --
    If you can't convince them, convict them.
  47. Re:Altered Carbon - this is the main plotline by swb · · Score: 2

    Hah, where do you think I got the idea? Irony points: I read it via Kindle app on the iPad.

  48. Re:But it's not the google experience by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the UK government protects its local artists/authors by not allowing imports unless registered under UK copyrights.

    What? What?

    Bullshit.

    I've exported plenty of books to the UK, (when I worked for a publisher) never heard of this requirement.

    Maybe you're thinking of North Korea or wherever it is you live, because "copyright registration" is not a requirement" to sell books in any civilised country.

    However, I'm sure publishers do want to restrict the marketing regions. They will have contractual arrangement with Amazon to do so. But that's nothing to do with either copyright or the UK government.

  49. DPI by manekineko2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    iPad 3 which has a much better DPI than the Fire

    iPad 3rd Gen has a resolution of 2048×1536 on a 9.7" screen, giving it a DPI of 264.

    Kindle Fire HD 8.9" has a resolution of 1920x1200 on a 8.9" screen, giving it a DPI of 254.

    For all intents and purposes, the Kindle Fire HD has the same DPI as the latest iPad.

  50. Re:But it's not the google experience by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 2

    Why would you need to annotate a PDF when you're reading an epub? Why would you need to zoom and crop a novel that has been reflowed with whatever text size you have chosen?

    the e-ink readers are designed for just that.. reading. Expecting one to be a PDF editor is pretty retarded.

    The comment was about e-ink readers not being useful in the dark, that was what my reply was in response to. Moving the goalposts doesn't make you look smarter, it makes it clear you're not.

  51. Re:But it's not the google experience by chrismcb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Get back to me after you spend most of the 8 hours of your 10 hour flight reading... and then immediately get on a train for a 10 hour train trip. How's that tablet working now?
    I like eink as I don't have to stare at a light bulb to read. Plus it has about a one month battery life.

  52. Re:But it's not the google experience by chrismcb · · Score: 2

    I'm at the point in my life where I don't want to manage a shitload of different devices.

    If you don't read books, then an ebook reader isn't for you. But if you do read books, what would you rather do? Manage a single device, or manage a shitload of different books?