Slashdot Mirror


The Perils of Developers Hooking Up

jammag writes "Who better for a developer to love than another developer? Yet as a veteran coder describes, it's not always a good idea for a programmer to fall for another programmer. He describes his experience observing — and getting partially pulled into — a romance within a development team. Part of the problem, perhaps, is that some developers spend so much time buried in code that, well, they quickly find themselves out of their league. Then again, why not love among the code?"

278 comments

  1. Old wisdom by SquarePixel · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is nothing more than the old wisdom of not dating anyone who is exactly like you. You need someone that shares little same interestst, but who can fullfil things you dont like or do. Yes, you can have one night stands between developers, but then again, majority of female programmers are ugly and insecure as hell, so you might want to get a normal person anyway.

    1. Re:Old wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      *COUGH* BS

      I am a mechanical engineer, wife is electrical. We have worked together have similar interests (though there are differences) and yet we have been together for 20 years!!!! In fact my wife is my mate for life. I don't know what what I would do without her. I also think your comment that a majority of female programmers are ugly and insecure is completely missing the mark. Get out of your hole caveman! Maybe you are the problem, not the women that you are critiquing.

    2. Re:Old wisdom by CoolToe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's true, female programmers tend to be ugly and insecure. We had one in our class and she was shy as hell.

      But why exactly would you want someone exactly like you to be your partner? It works much better when each other complete each other.

    3. Re:Old wisdom by mark-t · · Score: 2

      ...majority of female programmers are ugly

      Citation, please.

    4. Re:Old wisdom by neminem · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Because that way you understand each other. Because that way your eccentricities don't bother her so much, and vice versa. Because that way you can generally simultaneously do things that you enjoy doing and also spend time with the person you enjoy spending time with, rather than picking one or the other exclusively.

      I've never met anyone exactly like myself, though if I were single and did meet such a person, I would be immediately interested, but I wouldn't even consider a relationship with someone I didn't share a majority of interests and a similar worldview with. I've seen where that leads (it leads to a relationship like my parents' :p).

    5. Re:Old wisdom by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Nail on the head. My fiance is a civil engineer, I'm an application developer. Granted she doesn't get into coding in the same way that I do, but our love of classic video games, good sci-fi, and other nerdy pursuits makes us a pretty awesome couple. I've seen some messy workplace relationships in all fields, if anything that is what to avoid (if you're in a small workplace or work together in a small group). You should always be at the same intellectual level as your partner.

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    6. Re:Old wisdom by hawguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's true, female programmers tend to be ugly and insecure. We had one in our class and she was shy as hell.

      That's funny, one of our dev teams is over half female and none of them are ugly or insecure. And what does shy have to do with it? One of our star developers is shy and reserved outside of his team, but he still does great work. It may take longer to get to know a shy person, but it's generally worth the extra work. (I was painfully shy in high school and early college, but now I'm much more outgoing and have no problem giving presentations even to large (100+) groups)

    7. Re:Old wisdom by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Funny

      I am a mechanical engineer, wife is electrical.

      So, she brought the spark with her and you gave her steaming hot sex in exchange?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    8. Re:Old wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PBV.

      (As my old 10th grade calc teacher would say, "PBV" is not acceptable - "proved by vision").

    9. Re:Old wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes!

      I'm in IT, the wife is a CNA. After a day of work, she really doesn't understand what I had to do, nor do I understand some of the stuff she had to do and neither of understand what parts of what we did drive us crazy, made us frustrated, feel like we saved the day with something we did, etc.

      Look at this way. She's an art major (even though she ended up in the med field). I was having her try to teach me what art deco is.. and after her trying to explain and show examples and saying it's not like "this is black and white" type deal or whatever, I was still at a loss looking at stuff on the computer going "okay, so this is art deco? Well hell, this has to be!" and she just wanted to smack me.

      Sometimes being in the same field or fields close enough in relation you can understand when the other talks about work or other interests isn't a bad thing at all

    10. Re:Old wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most of the female programmers I know are actually cute. Granted, they are not absolute gorgeous but they are definitely not ugly.

    11. Re:Old wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, provide evidence that discriminating gender (or genus/species) is a priority. Most developers I know are willing to try (and frequently make use of) experimental functions. Animal, mineral, or vegetable... I'm convinced that developers are trysexuals.

    12. Re:Old wisdom by multipartmixed · · Score: 5, Funny

      > I am a mechanical engineer, wife is electrical.

      Wow, you are SO in the wrong field. I am a software engineer; my wife is biological.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    13. Re:Old wisdom by amicusNYCL · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We had one in our class and she was shy as hell.

      Weird, there was a person in your class who was singled out as being different from everyone else, and she was shy? Not sure I believe that...

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    14. Re:Old wisdom by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2

      A really old joke:
      A preacher, a politician, and a programmer walk into a bar.

      The preacher starts saying "I hope my congregation and my wife don't find out about my mistress on the side"

      The politician says "I hope my constituents don't find out about my love for gay bars".

      The programmer says "I introduced my mistress to my wife and gave them my credit card to go shopping with so I could GET SOME WORK DONE!"

      The only time in my marriage I was tempted to stray was early on with a programmer 5 years younger than myself, when we were both still in our 20s. She was sexy as all get out, despite getting insults at cons about her boob size (B-cup, where my wife's a DD). Why didn't we do it? Because it took 14 hour days in that job just to keep the *critical* software running.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    15. Re:Old wisdom by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Oh, and on the opposites attract thing, I like to say that put together my wife and I have one good brain between us. And she's into soap operas, not sci-fi.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    16. Re:Old wisdom by RearNakedChoke · · Score: 2

      It's true, female programmers tend to be ugly and insecure. We had one in our class and she was shy as hell. But why exactly would you want someone exactly like you to be your partner? It works much better when each other complete each other.

      Female coders are average looking, but so are their male counterparts. So apples to apples.

      Frankly, a male coder most likely will only attract another female coder. What extroverted, hot blonde is going to find some nerd attractive? And no, don't give me examples of the few RICH nerds with hot chicks.

    17. Re:Old wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You aren't an engineer

    18. Re:Old wisdom by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      then again, majority of female programmers are ugly and insecure as hell, so you might want to get a normal person anyway.

      I dunno, I dated a fellow coder in college -- she was by far the least crazy of any woman I've ever been with!

      It was actually pretty great -- no 'drama', no insecurities, no BS. We went all over the country; we did our homework together; we spent every day together and talked about everything from Linux and web development to politics to her cats. And when it finally came to an end...well, we stopped sleeping together but we're still good friends.

    19. Re:Old wisdom by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What it ACTUALLY is, is a misogynistic and discriminatory story that's trying to paint women in the workplace as instigators and troublemakers.

      Here, Adam... just take a bit of this apple.

      The evil attractive woman is added to the team, but "gets by" on her looks and seduces everyone around her. Whatever.

    20. Re:Old wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      one of our dev teams is over half female and none of them are ugly or insecure

      From the waist up, right? How is life in Thailand?

    21. Re:Old wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's it like to be a blind programmer?

    22. Re:Old wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm a developer, my wife is a DBA.
      She hates me, I hate her.

    23. Re:Old wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This is nothing more than the old wisdom..."

      There's the C developer and the Java developer and never the twain shall meet.

    24. Re:Old wisdom by Bengie · · Score: 1

      ROFL... wtb mod points

    25. Re:Old wisdom by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Don't be an asshole. One of my friends is an iron-ring-wearing, B.Eng. holding, stamp-owning, Professional Software Engineer registered with the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia.

      So they do exist, and a lot of universities offer majors in Software Engineering.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    26. Re:Old wisdom by sumdumass · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because that way you understand each other. Because that way your eccentricities don't bother her so much, and vice versa. Because that way you can generally simultaneously do things that you enjoy doing and also spend time with the person you enjoy spending time with, rather than picking one or the other exclusively.

      Or, it is a lot like masturbation without all the work being done by yourself?

      All joking aside, I dated a girl who was almost exactly like I thought I was. I found several things out. First, I wasn't like I thought I was. There was a lot about me I didn't know. Second, and probably most importantly, I couldn't stand her after a short period of time being around each other. She had the same problems, we would eventually drive each other nutz to the point we started fighting/arguing. We made an arrangement so we would never go to bed mad at each other. I would go for a walk and she would go into the kitchen and make something. Perhaps if I like nature better, we might still be together.

    27. Re:Old wisdom by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Okay, I'm glad I wasn't the only one who saw that. Seemed like the story author has a bit of a chip on his shoulder.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    28. Re:Old wisdom by spazdor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can't imagine why more women don't choose to enter the IT and dev professions when tech sites and forums are so full of gems like this one.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    29. Re:Old wisdom by spazdor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      getting insults at cons about her boob size

      What the serious fuck is wrong with people, man?

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    30. Re:Old wisdom by mark-t · · Score: 1

      What's proved by vision is that most of the people in the field seem to be male... not that most of the ones that happen to be female are ugly (although I've seen no shortage of male programmers who would be fugly as hell if they were women).

      In fact, the ratio of attractive women to unattractive women in the field is even higher than the ratio of attractive men to unattractive men.

      But this may be because women in a professional field tend to have more regard for their own appearance than the kinds of guys who are typically drawn into computer programming.

    31. Re:Old wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What extroverted, hot blonde is going to find some nerd attractive?

      It happens, but they may not like it to be known to the general public when it does.

      Get yourself a unique look. You'll be less attractive to some women and more attractive to others. The ones you are attractive to will "lay it on thicker" making it obvious you're not going to get rejected.

      I grew my hair out long out of laziness. Made a comment about how I need to cut it one day when I was feeling insecure when my hair was getting in the way trying to do some computer service. Chick said she liked it and I should leave it. Wife kept saying she liked it, but she always speaks highly of me. She tends to compliment appearances other women don't find attractive so as to reduce the number of women coming on to me. Anyway, I kept growing it out and the number of women coming on to me just keeps going up. Though, I know that some women are repulsed by it. Doesn't matter. Hot women like it.

      No, I don't cheat on my wife. I just like the ego boost from other women. Not many came on to me in high school. Wife understands that's why I like to be flirted with by other women.

      See JPL Mohawk Guy for another example of a unique look attracting women to nerdy men.

    32. Re:Old wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude! That's not a woman!
      The penis should have tipped you off.

    33. Re:Old wisdom by spazdor · · Score: 1

      Thank you.

      I am SO sick of this bullshit.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    34. Re:Old wisdom by neminem · · Score: 2

      Well, she does joke that she likes me because she must be a huge narcissist :p. (I knew I was looking for someone basically like her for as long as I had any desire to be with anyone, while she didn't know she was looking for someone like me (read: herself) until we met ;)).

      I'd argue, though, that if you didn't get along with someone you thought was like you because it turned out you didn't know yourself very well, that's hardly an argument against finding love with someone who's like you - much the opposite, in fact. (Then again, if I was the sort of person who started fights with people, I wouldn't want to be with a girl like me either...)

    35. Re:Old wisdom by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      You...you read the story? Who does that?

    36. Re:Old wisdom by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      I am a mechanical engineer, wife is electrical.

      Help me out here, I"m having a hard time visualizing how that... connection... would work.

    37. Re:Old wisdom by CCarrot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because that way you understand each other. Because that way your eccentricities don't bother her so much, and vice versa. Because that way you can generally simultaneously do things that you enjoy doing and also spend time with the person you enjoy spending time with, rather than picking one or the other exclusively.

      I've never met anyone exactly like myself, though if I were single and did meet such a person, I would be immediately interested, but I wouldn't even consider a relationship with someone I didn't share a majority of interests and a similar worldview with. I've seen where that leads (it leads to a relationship like my parents' :p).

      Exactly! My husband and I are both EE's and we've been happily together for...wow, has it really been 12 years already? Our main interests naturally have a lot of crossover, but it's not like we're clones of each other. We have plenty of other interests to discuss when we don't want to talk shop, and ones that allow us to interact with our (mostly non-engineer) friends. But when it's just the two of us, as you said, we can easily find things that interest us both. Museum of modern art? meh. Museum of scifi/fantasy? Two tickets, please!

      I do think we understand one another in ways that couples who subscribe to the 'opposites attract' theory of life never could. For example: he once got me a NAS unit with four 1TB hard drives for my birthday...and it was incredibly sweet, because it was exactly what I had wanted, right down to the brand of the hard drives. I think he must have snooped my browser history or something, because I hadn't even been hinting about it. Of course, if I do get a hankering for non-tech presents, I do have to hint very baldly indeed...but I know and accept that I won't get perfume for Christmas unless I email him the specific brand and where to buy it, whereas if I want the latest RPG for one of our gaming consoles, well, I just have to say 'hmmm, that one looks interesting' once ;o)

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    38. Re:Old wisdom by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "It worked for me, so you must be wrong" is probably the most horrible retort I ever have to deal with

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    39. Re:Old wisdom by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      So is she equipped with twist lock connections? If so are they water-tite? Also does she conform to ASME specs?

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    40. Re:Old wisdom by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Well, you've got to remember that even 15 years ago, most guys at cons were already distracted by the soft porn that DC and Marvel laughingly call comic books. Worse yet she was a gamer- ever see the drawings they make of women on D&D boxes?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    41. Re:Old wisdom by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Slow day at work.

      I was getting a little worried about where it was heading. "Is the IT department going to flag this?"

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    42. Re:Old wisdom by yotto · · Score: 2

      I married someone who was a very nice person but was different from me. We got divorced.

      I am now dating (Marriage is a sham I won't enter again) someone long-term who is very much like me. Not like I think I am (which I believe was your problem) but like I actually am. Every day is like the day we started dating. It's awesome.

    43. Re:Old wisdom by yotto · · Score: 1

      And using that one data point, you extrapolated a truth about every female programmer out there.

      Based on my observation of you, I predict that all men are GENIUSES!

    44. Re:Old wisdom by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      This.

      My wife and I are damn near the same person and it was obvious literally from day one that the relationship was going to work. Our arguments are usually about things like who was stupider in a dumb situation we encountered (it's either us fighting for the title ourselves, or going back and forth to figure out which idiot in a situation we witnessed was the bigger one). Even when we do argue about something bigger, it doesn't take long for us to realize that an argument has started and turn it playful; and we always resolve whatever the issue was that way.

      The problem people run up against when they go looking for someone just like themselves is precisely what GP stated, he just failed to frame it as such. You can't find someone like you until you've taken the time in your life to reflect on exactly who you are and make any intrapersonal changes that need to be made. Doing so after finding your transgender doppelganger typically results in learning that the other person is, in fact, not so much like yourself; especially when you both do so at the same time unless, by some miracle, you both make the same changes. Or you hate yourself. It's not gonna work ouy then, either.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    45. Re:Old wisdom by spazdor · · Score: 2

      If I'd been a member of this subculture back then, I would have tried to assemble roving gangs of hecklers to identify the guys pulling this sort of shit and follow them around making unsolicited observations about how their physiques differed from the guy on the shirtless-barbarian-warrior character class page.

      (Not that it would be okay for the tiny minority of Adonis-looking gamer nerds to pull this crap either, but still. Ugh. I am embarrassed on behalf of all geekdom when i hear these stories.)

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    46. Re:Old wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My husband and I were both software developers when we met, we've been married 26 years now. While we got engaged and had rings our true engagement hookup was the Apple II we bought together while dating. That's how we knew were serious about each other. ;-)

      And as someone who has often been the only female on a team for many years now, the female in the article was a poor worker, as a software developer or otherwise. It sounds like she was using members of the team to get her work done and that shouldn't be acceptable from anyone, female or male. And I have worked with a man who did that type of thing to get his work done. Was a big surprise to find out he couldn't code after the woman who had been covering for him left the project. And I hope I never see comments like his in code that say "Other developer name told me to do it this way so if it breaks it's not my fault."

    47. Re:Old wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      one of our dev teams is over half female and none of them are ugly or insecure

      From the waist up, right? How is life in Thailand?

      No, female from the waist down - they are very flat chested. If they had big boobs they'd never have gone into programming.

    48. Re:Old wisdom by sourcerror · · Score: 2

      ... and fish on the top.

    49. Re:Old wisdom by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      I guess most hard core IT or software guys wouldn't have much exposure in this area - they don't tend to get out of their field much unless they're working some sort of control system.

      Anyhow, there are many electromechanical interfaces that can be used to make the "connection" between electrical and mechanical components. Basic things like switches or thermocouples or even resistors (remember, heat is mechanical!) on up to electromagnetism. With the right wires and magnets you can make all sorts of mechanical connections to your electrical wife!

      --
      +1 Disagree
    50. Re:Old wisdom by ideonexus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. This is @#$%ing offensive. My wife and I are software developers and she is a million times the better coder than I, she is very attractive, and she was the lead developer at her last company, where she eventually decided to quit because of self-absorbed idiots like the author of this article who were constantly getting heart-bubbles for her and later putting her down when they learned she was out of their league. Today, years later, that same company pays her an exorbitant hourly rate to maintain their code because those same idiot developers can't program worth a damn, but they still try to make themselves feel better by sending her snotty emails criticizing the code she writes (that they could not write themselves).

      The intended audience for this piece are the same guys who read and believe Penthouse Forum. It's exactly this kind of delusional mindset that make the IT department in so many companies intolerable to deal with. I'm embarrassed see this make Slashdot, but maybe I shouldn't be surprised.

      --
      i ~ Celebrating Science, Cyberspace, Speculation
    51. Re:Old wisdom by berniemne · · Score: 1

      ROFL. I haven't seen one female programmer during my good 20 years programming carrier. Tho I live in Europe, so maybe that's to partially blame. Female coworkers yes, programmers nil.

    52. Re:Old wisdom by psithurism · · Score: 2

      It's true, female programmers tend to be ugly and insecure. We had one in our class and she was shy as hell.

      Whoops, it looks like the word female accidentally got into your sentence before your description programmers. You might want to fix that before everyone thinks you're being a total misogynist based on one anecdote that could be said to support half of your theory.

    53. Re:Old wisdom by psithurism · · Score: 5, Funny

      If they had big boobs they'd never have gone into programming.

      Really? Because almost all of the programmers that I know have enormous, hairy boobs. Doesn't seem to have impeded those guys in the least.

    54. Re:Old wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      I would go for a walk and she would go into the kitchen and make something.

      Better be a sandwich.

    55. Re:Old wisdom by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Software Engineering is the most incorrectly used term in history. Sure it legitimately applies in a few cases, but the vast majority of the time I see it used it means something no different than a programmer/code monkey.

      It seems like jobs that are posted with the "software engineer" title are more likely to attract extremely unqualified candidates for some reason.

    56. Re:Old wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because in most places the professional associations don't take this seriously and can't be bothered to do anything about it. In Canada it is illegal to call yourself an Engineer if you're not actually one and the associations do go after people who do that. That's also why Microsoft got sued (and lost) because of their made up "engineer" certificates.

    57. Re:Old wisdom by nbauman · · Score: 1

      Misogynistic. That's the word.

      First, I'm not sure that the story is true. A lot of stories get "improved" with the telling. It sounds like the dialog of some porn movies that I prefer to watch with the sound off. There might be a germ of truth to it.

      Second, if it is true, that girl is one obnoxious bitch. It's one thing to be flirtatious; it's another thing to sleep with everybody in the office for the joy of playing them off against each other. This is a good way to disrupt the office and get fired. If true.

      And I don't see how it's particularly an issue in programming. The (exaggerated) stereotype is that male programmers are socially inept nerds. This sounds like one socially inept woman. If true.

    58. Re:Old wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get with the times. Please define engineering and expain how software engineering does not fit the description.

    59. Re:Old wisdom by dintech · · Score: 1

      Back when we used Visual Source Safe and only one guy could check a file out at a time, you were lucky to have one woman on your team. Resource contention. Now we use Git, there are 50% women and everybody gets their own repository, so to speak.

    60. Re:Old wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a female developer. And yes, I am homely. I am also kind, and funny, and tack sharp, and ambitious (need a startup partner?), and a decent cook, and earn a solid salary that helps finance a home full of toys of all sorts and awesome vacations.

      Maybe one day, the prejudice against ugly women as mates will go the way of the old prejudice against male geeks as mates. There's lots to recommend many, if not most, "ugly" women if you'd just stop to talk to us long enough to learn about it.

    61. Re:Old wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      G cup big enough for you? I earned my first contract programmer money in 1982.

    62. Re:Old wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Protip: Just because they say they like your hair, doesn't mean they're coming on to you.

      A common nerd mistake when dealing with the fairer sex.

    63. Re:Old wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umbrage, the coin of this age, is so easy yet skims over so much.
      In engineering college and at various jobs I have know women who used their looks to good advantage, and did flirt with anyone whom could advance their interests while covering up inadequacies.
      I've also known plenty of guys that tried to get ahead on something other than talent or knowledge.
      The world isn't a meritocracy.

    64. Re:Old wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting story. So it sounds like it was a mutual temptation? I'm sure we'd all love to hear more anecdotes about this experience you had. Girl coders are hot, but so rare.

    65. Re:Old wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you had a perfect relationship! So what went wrong?

    66. Re:Old wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably meant "fiancee", unless she is a man.

    67. Re:Old wisdom by heefeneet · · Score: 1

      ... and fish on the top.

      Miranda, is that you? -- Cat

    68. Re:Old wisdom by pnutjam · · Score: 4, Interesting

      13 Years into our legal agreement that encapsulates dozens of different legal agreements (marriage).

      Some of the benefits of marriage which you may not be able to duplicate with other legal documents:
      -visitation rights in jail or hospital
      -automatic right of survivor-ship on joint accounts/leases
      -next of kin rights for inheritance and medical decisions if incapacitated
      -marital communications privileges during lawsuit or criminal proceedings
      -joint adoption/parenting rights
      -insurance benefits at most jobs
      -able to receive social security, disability, or medicaid benefits
      -able to receive some portion of most pensions after partner is deceased
      -exemption for estate and gift taxes on items given to your spouse
      -joint tax return

      Marriage is more then a piece of paper, even discounting any religious significance.

    69. Re:Old wisdom by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      So, does that mean that even though I am a Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer, I'm really not an engineer? My self-image is ruined! ;-)

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    70. Re:Old wisdom by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Never had the time to find out if it was mutual or not; I was married and with the 14 hour days, we never let the temptation get that far. There was always a *work based* fire to put out first that took priority.

      Then 9-11-01 happened, and within two months, she was laid off, then my mother in law died, then I was laid off. Never saw her again. Never did find out if that company survived, it took me two years to find work again.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    71. Re:Old wisdom by Sentax · · Score: 1

      Thank you. Was just thinking the same reading the "marriage is a sham" comment. A lot of people believe it's the government trying to keep tabs on you, or it's strictly religious, but your points are valid and I know I would want them available to me.

    72. Re:Old wisdom by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1
      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    73. Re:Old wisdom by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Damn. The link was supposed to be "Atheist Misogynist Club" not the description of what they said about this one blogger who now no longer blogs because of it.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    74. Re:Old wisdom by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Yep, that's why it's an MCSP in Canada.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    75. Re:Old wisdom by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "It seems like jobs that are posted with the "software engineer" title are more likely to attract extremely unqualified candidates for some reason."

      That reason would be that more than 80% of the people in the filed are under-qualified or completely unqualified. This is what happens when articles hit the magazines stating that software is the next big thing and that it is going to be a lucrative field (circa 1980s/1990s.) It got flooded with people who were in it to make money even though they couldn't care less about being any good at it.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    76. Re:Old wisdom by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      You made the mistake of listening to an AC. As it turns out, we are not interested in hearing more about it.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    77. Re:Old wisdom by jythie · · Score: 1

      Unlikely (but obviously happens).

      Many female programmers will not date within their profession. It can be hard enough to be seen as a person in such an environment in the first place, dating around the office just cements the problem.

    78. Re:Old wisdom by PurplePhase · · Score: 1

      I love your story! Mod points wouldn't be enough for your post 8)

      I love your .sig too ;)

      8-PP

    79. Re:Old wisdom by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      While we're on the subject of "was I the only one?", was I the only one who thought for sure that when Chuck entered the room we were finally going to get to the pr0n part of this Penthouse Forum reject?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    80. Re:Old wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What it ACTUALLY is, is a misogynistic and discriminatory story

      ... you can just stop right there.

      Was it me or... did that read like a piece of contrived fiction designed to be some sort of parable?

      I think that this soft of thing happens irrespective of profession, and mature men (and women) will detect and shut that shit down pronto. I suspect the lads in this "article" (I'm assuming it's based on a real incident) are not particularly adroit and fluent in their dealings with the opposite sex. There are manipulators in all professions, and of both sexes. Keep your head on a swivel.

      The following is firmly in TL;DR territory on nerds/geeks and relationships.. many of my friends fall into that category. Now that I work with grad students I see this sort of thing with SOME (definitely not all) of them as well. If you consider yourself well adjusted and have had relationships, read no further; the following it for those who have absolutely no clue.

      I've realized after hanging out here on Slashdot that I'm not a geek (already turned in the card)... maybe it's that I have varied interests.. maybe it's that I have that "don't give a fuck" attitude when meeting women for the first time.. but I'm a divorced engineer in my 40s (who had been married to another engineer) who stays in shape. I'm not rich. I'm not particularly good looking. And I have NEVER had a problem getting a date. I'm not bragging, I'm just saying that if I can pull this off, you can too. Now send me ten bucks for a pdf on the subject. Just kidding.

      The following is for you guys who really, really have no game at all. I know you're out there. I know you're lonely. And I know some of you do NOT know how to channel that initial excitement when you first meet somebody you really really like. I've seen guys literally bounce around... I've seen some guys damned near paw women out of enthusiasm. Not necessarily evil, just inappropriate and misguided. First: she's a human being. Treat her as such. Then check yourself. Do a self analysis. Ask yourself before you even open your mouth "am I about to say or do something really stupid?" Am I hopping around like Jerry Lewis on a Starbucks triple-shot? Just calm the hell down.

      Disclaimer: I only date women that I perceive to be introspective and mature. If you end up with somebody vapid this may not be the way to go. I love the aesthetics of the female form, but the people I pursue are the ones who have said or done something I find to be interesting or intriguing.

      When I first meet somebody of the opposite sex that I'm interested in, after a bit of casual conversation to determine if there's a chance, I ask if they'd like to go out for lunch or a light dinner (little to no alcohol). My modus operandi is this: I mediate a bit before the date, and calm the fuck down. Sometimes I will get there early and cheat a bit and knock down a single glass of Merlot.

      Then.. after the initial meeting and you're sitting down to eat.. you might find she's nervous too. Then.. you have to work this out for yourself.. but.. my "line" is this (with a very easy going, earnest delivery accompanied by a gentle smile): "We're just trying to figure it out.. you know.. find the right one for us. No need to stress about it." Don't dominate the conversation, but do cultivate the conversation. Listen to what she's saying. I've seen guys with nervous energy rip off at the mouth like a belt of 7.62mm out of Rambo's M-60. Be nice! One more time (Shaft!) say it with me: calm the hell down. End the date calmly and courteously (shake hands if mediocre, hug or a light kiss if she makes the move), resist the urge to go to each other's place on the first night, and after you're away from her think about what just happened.

      Think I'd better hit the AC box on this one. ;) Apologies to Richard Roundtree.

    81. Re:Old wisdom by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      It's an article about a sociopath, who just happened to be an attractive female. The story, American Psycho, is no more sexist than this particular anecdote, only it happens to be about an attractive male sociopath.

      Your reaction makes a fair number of assumptions about the aim of the article. All it's trying to say, is don't get too mixed up with pretty people at the work place before you get to know them. That pretty much goes for men AND women alike. I think the workplace modifier is there because it's your place of employment - it makes things far more complicated than the equivalent mistake being made between visitors at a bar.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    82. Re:Old wisdom by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

      Do you suffer from a syndrome in which it's impossible to tell the difference between reality and fiction?

      The author of the story is purporting that is tale is real. American Psycho is a work of fiction.

      Further, American Psycho was about a guy that imagined everything.

      The fact that you think that the story is the same as a guy who thinks he murders people (both men and women) tells a lot more about you than anything else.

    83. Re:Old wisdom by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      I love your story! Mod points wouldn't be enough for your post 8)

      I love your .sig too ;)

      8-PP

      Thanks! That story usually gets a chuckle and rolled eyes from those who know us :)

      It just goes to show that having lots in common with your partner isn't 'boring'...in fact, I think it's essential if you want to build a long-term, trusting relationship. I'm not saying that pilots and accountants can never be happy together, they had just better have a *lot* of other areas of interest in common :o)

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    84. Re:Old wisdom by fdrebin · · Score: 1
      I totally agree, but one interesting point here:

      My wife and I have shown our marriage certificate exactly ONCE in the 31 years since we got married, and that was to change her name. In effect, we're married because we SAY we're married.

      Interesting legal position, I presume.

      --
      Stupidity... has a habit of getting its way.
    85. Re:Old wisdom by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      In 10 states (and other states you move to after that), you aren't just _in effect_ married because you say you are.. You ARE legally married because you say you are.. Common law marriage.

    86. Re:Old wisdom by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 1

      You should always be at the same intellectual level as your partner.

      This could be the best advice I ever read on Slashdot...

      --
      "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
    87. Re:Old wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah

    88. Re:Old wisdom by Young+Master+Ploppy · · Score: 1

      I'm a developer, my wife is a DBA. She hates me, I hate her.

      ....and she keeps denying you privileges?

      I'm not even going to start making jokes about penetration testing...

      --
      http://instantbadger.blogspot.com
    89. Re:Old wisdom by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I was trying to yank the conversation back to the issue that I originally posted the joke for: Who the hell has time for an affair when there is much more important work to be done?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    90. Re:Old wisdom by pnutjam · · Score: 2

      Yeah, there are good reasons gay people want the right to marry. It's not just to piss off religious people.

    91. Re:Old wisdom by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Couples with common interests do stay together for life or very very long times. Parents are one example, small store owners are another, and people in NGOs are a third group.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  2. You've changed... by Translation+Error · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why don't you ever comment anymore?

    --
    When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
    1. Re:You've changed... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Funny

      (mumble) perl necklace (/mumble)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:You've changed... by CoolToe · · Score: 2

      Oh you dirty guy, call my constructor function!

    3. Re:You've changed... by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oooh, dereference my pointer.

    4. Re:You've changed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I tried, but ran into NullPointerException.

    5. Re:You've changed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm gonna violate array bounds like nobody's business.

      You won't even have time to garbage collect before I'm dumping core.

    6. Re:You've changed... by wcrowe · · Score: 4, Funny

      unzip, strip, touch, finger, grep, mount, fsck, more, yes,fsck,fsck,fsck,umount, sleep

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
    7. Re:You've changed... by X0563511 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe you just need to spend a bit more time initializing your pointer.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    8. Re:You've changed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you are trying to make a joke, atleast do it properly. Use a semicolon instead of the comma, and it makes sense in both english and bash.

    9. Re:You've changed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would comment more, but I don't understand your methods anymore.

    10. Re:You've changed... by jmerlin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Where's the MilkFactory?

      RIght there, I'm pointing to it.

      I don't se..
      Segmentation Fault

    11. Re:You've changed... by jmerlin · · Score: 1

      You forgot the curl between the umount and sleep.

    12. Re:You've changed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call shenanigans. I don't remember that Proverbs verse.

    13. Re:You've changed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      if you just unmount, sleep without at least some touch, you probably getting an access denied when you try to logon the next time...

    14. Re:You've changed... by Translation+Error · · Score: 3, Funny

      You ass! You promised me you were in safe mode!

      --
      When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
    15. Re:You've changed... by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 4, Funny

      unzip, strip, touch, finger, grep, mount, fsck, more, yes,fsck,fsck,fsck,umount, sleep

      And remember, folks: using sudo is NOT OK!

    16. Re:You've changed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the curl between the umount and sleep.

      This is probably from a guy's perspective, but curl is optional, right?

    17. Re:You've changed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forgot about the:

      cd pub; cat beer; more beer; cd home; unzip...

    18. Re:You've changed... by rylin · · Score: 1

      rapist.

    19. Re:You've changed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that sleep call will get you every time... just ask Julian Assange.

    20. Re:You've changed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't the colon make it confusing?

      c: enter: ###

      Guess not. Go on.

    21. Re:You've changed... by da007 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why don't you ever comment anymore?

      Because you don't commit.

    22. Re:You've changed... by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why don't you ever comment anymore?

      Because you don't commit.

      Maybe I'd be more willing to commit if you'd be more willing to fork.

    23. Re:You've changed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The semicolon is an advanced technique, and is only to be used if you and your lady are adventurous.

      It requires lots of lubricant and a very gentle touch.

    24. Re:You've changed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just can't commit; right now.

    25. Re:You've changed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You won't even have time to garbage collect before I'm dumping core.

      A big-O of 1...a bit selfish, no? Then again if she's trying to free up that memory, maybe it's polite to finish that quickly.

    26. Re:You've changed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm only interested in an unconditional jump.

    27. Re:You've changed... by Grog6 · · Score: 1

      I wore protection.

      I wear this ground strap everywhere...

      --
      Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
    28. Re:You've changed... by Grog6 · · Score: 1

      Using sudo is perfectly fine if she's a submissive.

      --
      Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
    29. Re:You've changed... by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      unzip; strip; touch; finger; grep; mount; fsck; more; yes;fsck;fsck;fsck;umount;boot;clean;sleep

      --
      ~X~
    30. Re:You've changed... by MarkRose · · Score: 2

      Hey, I can't help that I'm an object oriented guy.

      --
      Be relentless!
  3. The perils of programmers marrying by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have to assume gestation takes about 17 months. And the resulting baby in no way resembles what everyone was expecting.

    1. Re:The perils of programmers marrying by SJHillman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Babies have scope creep written all over them.

    2. Re:The perils of programmers marrying by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 5, Funny

      But if you have nine people involved, it only takes one month! Or so my manager told me once.

    3. Re:The perils of programmers marrying by Bogtha · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just wait until you hear about how long you've got to support it. And you go to jail if you EOL it!

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    4. Re:The perils of programmers marrying by Translation+Error · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you end up having twins (or triplets, etc.), do you tell everyone that your pregnancy forked?

      --
      When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
    5. Re:The perils of programmers marrying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The worst part is garbage-in, garbage-out. Except frequently, you don't know the garbage that went in (A Lego? Playdough? Why are their lips purple?) so you find yourself attempting to debug their garbage out. That's one of the worst jobs ever...

    6. Re:The perils of programmers marrying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Refactoring...throwing the baby out with the bathwater!

    7. Re:The perils of programmers marrying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume he meant 9 people (of a specific gender) plus the manager. Or else I dont see how that is possible.

    8. Re:The perils of programmers marrying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if they are identical.
        Else it is a simple case of not using a Singleton function.

    9. Re:The perils of programmers marrying by Megahard · · Score: 1

      Don't call it a baby, it's a "marriage artifact".

      --
      I eat only the real part of complex carbohydrates.
  4. How did that piece of fiction make it to slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    seriously, this can't be real.

  5. My wife doesn't understand me by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    said perl, that's why I brainfuck around.

    --
    Nullius in verba
    1. Re:My wife doesn't understand me by froggymana · · Score: 1

      said perl, that's why I brainfuck around.

      I C what you did there.

      --
      "To prevent this day from getting any worse, I'll just read ERROR as GOOD THING" 1GJU8xLuDKDxEs4KLf8fAGyptoDsqvEsBT
  6. Even a dog knows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...not to shit where they eat.

    Hooking up with cow-orkers often ends badly -- the line of work has nothing to do with it.

    1. Re:Even a dog knows... by TWX · · Score: 1

      ...not to shit where they eat.

      You've obviously never met the dog that we had when I was a kid...

      To be polite about it, the dog was kind of confused as to what was food and what was not food...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:Even a dog knows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      | Hooking up with cow-orkers

      Someone said they were ugly, but not cows.

    3. Re:Even a dog knows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he is a redneck programmer. You know code a while, look amorously at cows, get the juices flowing. And then bam 9months later there is a brand new cow.

    4. Re:Even a dog knows... by TheInternetGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Even a dog knows...not to shit where they eat.

      I beg to differ, and so does Matt Inman it would seem. http://theoatmeal.com/comics/dog_paradox

      --
      If my comment didn't sound as good in your head as it did in mine, then I guess we all know who's to blame
    5. Re:Even a dog knows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just dogs. Everything is food to a dog - even their own puke.

  7. Ugh by Bogtha · · Score: 4, Informative

    What's this rubbish doing on Slashdot? It's a badly written co-worker romance short story.

    --
    Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    1. Re:Ugh by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's a badly written work of fiction. I'm guessing it got posted on Datamation because even Harlequin has standards.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Total fiction and uninsightful.

    3. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Submitter's URL is 'datamation.com'...

    4. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Slashdot isn't about technology anymore. If it were it would lose at least 75% of its dwindling user base.

    5. Re:Ugh by tatman · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing. In fact, I thought I just read the same story in letters to ....

      --
      I've always said English was my second language. Had Romeo and Juliet been written in C, I might have understood it.
    6. Re:Ugh by billybob2001 · · Score: 1

      This really should have been written something like:

      #696969 #6A6A6A #6B6B6B #6C6C6C #6D6D6D
      #6E6E6E #6F6F6F #707070 #717171 #727272
      #737373 #747474 #757575 #767676 #777777
      #787878 #797979 #7A7A7A #7B7B7B #7C7C7C
      #7D7D7D #7E7E7E #7F7F7F #808080 #818181
      #828282 #838383 #848484 #858585 #868686
      #878787 #888888 #898989 #8A8A8A #8B8B8B
      #8C8C8C #8D8D8D #8E8E8E #8F8F8F #909090
      #919191 #929292 #939393 #949494 #959595
      #969696 #979797 #989898 #999999 #9A9A9A

      ...or your preferred 50 shades.

    7. Re:Ugh by MrMadnutz · · Score: 2

      Yep, "fifty shades of ones and zeros" would be better than this shite.

    8. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the fakest story ever faked since the moon landing.

    9. Re:Ugh by mjwx · · Score: 2

      It's a badly written work of fiction. I'm guessing it got posted on Datamation because even Harlequin has standards.

      //Fifty Shades of Green (colour may vary depending on IDE)

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  8. Simple Rule by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't fuck where you eat.

    1. Re:Simple Rule by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      Unless you want to be the Edmund Hillary of shitting where you eat

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Lm6CD__BJw

    2. Re:Simple Rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't fuck what you eat.

      FTFY

    3. Re:Simple Rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never done it on the kitchen table...? Oh, right. Slashdot. Never mind...

  9. Don't crap where you eat... by TWX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's generally not a good idea to have an office romance with someone that you spend most of your workday working closely with, regardless of the profession, but especially in working groups that are very stable and unchanging.

    You see this person about eight hours a day, and might even work in the same group-cubicle. If your relationship gets serious then you're likely to see them many hours a day beyond the workday too. For probably most of us, best case and the relationship goes well, one gets a little tired of the significant other after awhile, but literally can't escape because of the enforced time at work together. Worst case, the relationship ends, badly, and you're stuck with them in the same confined space but now can't stand each other.

    Eight or so years ago I dated a gal for a few months that works at one of the sites I support and it's still a little awkward running into her when I go there. I can't imagine the awkwardness if we worked at the same site, let alone the same department. It would probably also complicate my subsequent marriage, as I doubt my wife would be very happy with me working closely with an old flame.

    If working groups are varied and dynamic and if the organization is large enough that one doesn't constantly see the other, then it might work okay to date a coworker, but even then it has its perils, not even getting into career choices.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Don't crap where you eat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or, one is promoted and another has to admit the romance occurred even though they're both married. This causes many issues up to and including one party losing out on the promotion because they didn't disclose it first and the other feeling alienated by their superiors and having fear of future jobs loss, etc and then having to change jobs to avoid any future issues at that organization.

      Seriously, take it from someone who knows: keep your hands to yourself at work.

    2. Re:Don't crap where you eat... by Bengie · · Score: 2

      Rules at my work is dating only across departments. We have many married couples working here, but always different departments and never a direct superior.

    3. Re:Don't crap where you eat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There were no rules about it except for someone not being allowed to supervise someone they were or had been seeing. The problem in this instance occurred when the superiors took a negative view of the relationship because both of those involved were married to other people and the person being promoted did not previously disclose the relationship knowing they would be over the person they had the relationship with.

    4. Re:Don't crap where you eat... by dkleinsc · · Score: 2

      The more general version of this is that dual relationships (that is, where 2 people have a professional relationship of any kind with a close friend or partner) are risky, because problems in one area tend to spill over to the other. That's why banging your clients is typically barred by professional organizations, and why banging your coworkers is usually at least questionable at many companies. In the case of medical professionals, they're generally advised against treating family members as well except in emergencies. It makes things far less complicated.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    5. Re:Don't crap where you eat... by russotto · · Score: 1

      Rules at my work is dating only across departments. We have many married couples working here, but always different departments and never a direct superior.

      Yeah, rules. If you're interested in her and she's interested in you, are the two of you going to let office rules stand in the way? I mean, certainly many people are faithful to their marriage, and some (even today) to religious constraints. But how many people with any passion at all would be faithful to office rules? Not too many.

  10. Personalities by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    Job focus, education, political leanings - while they may help form who you are, they are not criterion upon which lasting relationships are founded.

    IMO, It boils down to A) the personalities involved, and B) how well one person deals with the other person's annoying little quirks.

    As for B, well... patience goes a long way. Doesn't hurt if you really love the other person, too - makes those little annoyances far easier to deal with.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  11. "why not love among the code?" by Virtucon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Because you'll get the keyboards all sticky!

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    1. Re:"why not love among the code?" by denvergeek · · Score: 1

      Damn, you beat me to it.

    2. Re:"why not love among the code?" by tool462 · · Score: 1

      Mountain Dew and Cheetos, when properly mixed, make an excellent liquid repellent.

    3. Re:"why not love among the code?" by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Generally, it's beating yourself to it that results in a sticky keyboard.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    4. Re:"why not love among the code?" by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      Or a spermacide?

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  12. Dating a co-worker can be bad for your health by proca · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Inter-office romance shouldn't be banned, but you better be damn sure before jumping into a relationship with a co-worker. I don't see how the job description changes that fact. Life isn't fair, and if the relationship ends badly (and it surfaces at work), the woman is more likely to be the subject of gossip and office drama among colleagues.

    1. Re:Dating a co-worker can be bad for your health by hawguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Inter-office romance shouldn't be banned, but you better be damn sure before jumping into a relationship with a co-worker. I don't see how the job description changes that fact. Life isn't fair, and if the relationship ends badly (and it surfaces at work), the woman is more likely to be the subject of gossip and office drama among colleagues.

      As a manager I wish office relationships were banned. No matter what the intentions are when starting a relationship, the truth is that many relationships die, and sometimes die a horrible, prolonged death. And when it involves two people that have to work together, the whole team suffers.

    2. Re:Dating a co-worker can be bad for your health by dkleinsc · · Score: 2

      You can't be damn sure before jumping into a relationship.

      Some of the things you almost definitely don't know about somebody before you start a relationship, and would sound very weird asking about before you got into one: Do they snore, steal the blankets, or have other annoying nighttime habits? What are they like when they first wake up? Do they like to have the same kind of sex you do? Do they want to have children? If you both want to have children, what kind of parent would they be? Do they have the same expectations of sexual exclusivity or lack thereof as you do? Do they have a crazy and jealous ex? What kind of deep personal conversations do they like to have? Are they a financial spender or saver?

      These kinds of issues all have profound effects on whether a relationship will be successful, and you have absolutely no way of really knowing before you get into it.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    3. Re:Dating a co-worker can be bad for your health by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Inter-office romance shouldn't be banned, but you better be damn sure before jumping into a relationship with a co-worker. I don't see how the job description changes that fact. Life isn't fair, and if the relationship ends badly (and it surfaces at work), the woman is more likely to be the subject of gossip and office drama among colleagues.

      As a manager I wish office relationships were banned. No matter what the intentions are when starting a relationship, the truth is that many relationships die, and sometimes die a horrible, prolonged death. And when it involves two people that have to work together, the whole team suffers.

      Well I'm glad you don't get to decide that dipshit, because historically husband and wife teams have done some excellent work.

    4. Re:Dating a co-worker can be bad for your health by hawguy · · Score: 2

      Inter-office romance shouldn't be banned, but you better be damn sure before jumping into a relationship with a co-worker. I don't see how the job description changes that fact. Life isn't fair, and if the relationship ends badly (and it surfaces at work), the woman is more likely to be the subject of gossip and office drama among colleagues.

      As a manager I wish office relationships were banned. No matter what the intentions are when starting a relationship, the truth is that many relationships die, and sometimes die a horrible, prolonged death. And when it involves two people that have to work together, the whole team suffers.

      Well I'm glad you don't get to decide that dipshit, because historically husband and wife teams have done some excellent work.

      Given my experience at the workplace, I'd say that about 10% of office romances last more than a year. About 30% of the remainder end in emotional mess, leaving one or both partners unable to work at their full potential for weeks or months (or never, leading one to transfer or quit), the the other 70% end quietly, with just some gentle tension between the former partners.

      How many of these great husband-wife teams have worked successfully at a company? (as opposed to working for themselves... my own wife and I have been successfully running a small business, but that doesn't mean that I'd want her to be a coworker at the office).

    5. Re:Dating a co-worker can be bad for your health by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Inter-office romance shouldn't be banned, but you better be damn sure before jumping into a relationship with a co-worker. I don't see how the job description changes that fact. Life isn't fair, and if the relationship ends badly (and it surfaces at work), the woman is more likely to be the subject of gossip and office drama among colleagues.

      As a manager I wish office relationships were banned. No matter what the intentions are when starting a relationship, the truth is that many relationships die, and sometimes die a horrible, prolonged death. And when it involves two people that have to work together, the whole team suffers.

      Make prospective couples fill out a form for notification of romantic entanglement. Add a clause like "If the relationship terminates and the two of you are no longer able to work together, one of the couple will be asked to cease employment. The decision will be made on the basis of coin toss, or management discretion. You won't know which."

    6. Re:Dating a co-worker can be bad for your health by swilly · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, form B, the Notification of Romantic Entanglement. Just remember to stamp it five times.

    7. Re:Dating a co-worker can be bad for your health by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many of these great husband-wife teams have worked successfully at a company? (as opposed to working for themselves... my own wife and I have been successfully running a small business, but that doesn't mean that I'd want her to be a coworker at the office).

      What? You think scientists most often work for themselves?

      Marie and Pierre Curie.
      http://www.princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S24/53/41M02/index.xml?section=science

      How about business?
      http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703293204576106070417989688.html

      That took a couple of seconds to Google. If you are interested you can find plenty of examples.

      Just because YOU can't get along with your wife, doesn't mean you should be permitted to make rules for other people who are not you and do not have your shortcomings (individual or as a couple). Not every couple is up to the challenge, but some are. The ones whose relationships fail spectacularly at work have bigger problems to begin with.

    8. Re:Dating a co-worker can be bad for your health by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Just because YOU can't get along with your wife, doesn't mean you should be permitted to make rules for other people who are not you and do not have your shortcomings (individual or as a couple). Not every couple is up to the challenge, but some are. The ones whose relationships fail spectacularly at work have bigger problems to begin with.

      I don't know if you'd bothered to read my post, but I asked how many successful husband wife teams work at a company, not how many of them founded a company or did great science. Couples that start a company together have already demonstrated that they can work well together, and if they are the founders, if they come out of the copy room half-dressed, there's not going to be any office gossip about the boss sleeping with his wife, and if they go through a messy divorce it's going to affect the company whether or not they both work there or not. The rules are different for company founders versus rank-and-file employees, which is where I've had the worst experiences with office romances.

      And I said that my wife and I *do* run a small business, relatively successful in that it pays for its expenses (including a couple employees) and a decent profit. yet despite our success at running the business ourselves, I'd cringe if our employees started dating amongst themselves, knowing that there's a good chance that we'd end up losing one or both of them as employees when the relationship fails.

    9. Re:Dating a co-worker can be bad for your health by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      There's always some arsehole who's ready to shit all over a balanced and reasonable opinion with hostile bullshit because it doesn't match their opinion; regardless of another's experience, their own opinion is the only one worth considering.

      Thank you for taking the time to overlook this crap and provide a mature and insightful response.

      As the owner of a tiny two-person IT shop I'm very interested in your experiences on the topic. My first priority is to my staff's needs, because of my belief that staff are the most important part of my business. I've run and sold slightly larger companies in the past and am starting all over again but feel I've still much to learn on the topic. What I find particularly difficult is the balancing of short term needs versus long term harm, such as you describe with office romances.

      It's not my place to act as 'parent' to my employees but where I must play parent is to my infant business, busy burping and purging itself of yellow....stuff....when I gently massage its back.

      That means it's often only myself that is thinking of the future, planning for potential problems etc. Well, that's to be expected! I am the 'boss' after all. However, my point is that in matters of emotion people tend not to have the objectivity that a third party maintains. That said, I don't want try to dictate anything to anyone about their private life... so 'round we go again.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  13. Compartmentalize. But it ain't easy. by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    Speaking from experience, it can be fine if you're not working together on the same project. Otherwise, it takes a lot of effort to compartmentalize. You cannot allow personal stuff to leak into work stuff. Imagine the following conversation:

    Person A: "That structure doesn't look right. You should do something like this." (demonstrates)
    Person B: "There's nothing wrong with it."
    Person A: "It's inefficient."
    Person B: (Irritated) "Oh yeah? Well, I don't like the way you slurp your coffee!"

    At this point things begin to spiral out of control...

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  14. s/developers/people by edsousa · · Score: 2

    Clearly the guy only knows programmers... the story he tells has nothing to do with the job. And the girl is a bitch.

  15. Absolutely don't date a developer (for men) by Shompol · · Score: 1

    The absolute majority of developers are male, which stacks the "market" against us. There is usually little to no selection, while the sole lady in the group gets all the attention of the 120+ male programmers. I suspect that this is the root cause of the "mom's basement" paradigm. I lost count how many times I wished to be an Accountant or something.

    So, to those single devs on this thread: get off your little couches and your home gaming rigs, and find someone outside the office. I recommend friends of friends, or some sort of community. Can even go back to school and get a non-technical degree (like Accounting!).

    1. Re:Absolutely don't date a developer (for men) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was just hoping that I'd get assigned to a marketing project. But they were only ever interested in the finance guys......apparently the marketing girls liked money instead of technology. :)

    2. Re:Absolutely don't date a developer (for men) by Spy+Handler · · Score: 2

      get off your little couches and your home gaming rigs, and find someone outside the office.

      Church is recommended for the ~1% of Slashdotters who actually have a religion. Lots of normal females to meet there.

      For the 99% who are atheists, I recommend music. If you played a musical instrument in middle/high school, go to a local community college and enroll in a performing class. If you're actually (still) proficient, you can join some kind of a community orchestra.

    3. Re:Absolutely don't date a developer (for men) by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      If you played a musical instrument in middle/high school, go to a local community college and enroll in a performing class. If you're actually (still) proficient, you can join some kind of a community orchestra.

      One time ... at band camp ...

      But, slightly more seriously ... that's it? Church or music? I'm betting you've covered 2% of everyone here and that "not religious and not musical" covers a huge swath of people.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:Absolutely don't date a developer (for men) by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      For the 99% who are atheists, I recommend music. If you played a musical instrument in middle/high school, go to a local community college and enroll in a performing class. If you're actually (still) proficient, you can join some kind of a community orchestra.

      I second this; having been a member of several small, local theater groups in my youth, I can say with assurance that participating in the performing arts is a great way to get some tail.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    5. Re:Absolutely don't date a developer (for men) by Voyager529 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Church is recommended for the ~1% of Slashdotters who actually have a religion. Lots of normal females to meet there.

      Let me guess - you're the 99%.

      As one of the handful of Christian Slashdotters, I can tell you that this is patently not the case. A "nonreligious" girl will say something like, "I'm not feeling it" or, "you're a nice guy, but...". The majority of the girls with whom I spent my adolescence with in church would say, "I don't feel led to date you" or "You're a nice guy, but God told me to date Mr. Tall-dark-wealthy-handsome over there." At one point I learned that trying to beat them at their own game by saying something to the effect of, "I understand, and am certain that you have been praying about it for some time, since Exodus 20:7 does condemn using God's name to justify actions that you take at variance with His direction, right?" at which point I learned that turning things into a scripture war isn't exactly the best way to win her heart, even if I win the argument. To sum up, girls in church generally only differ from the majority of girls outside of church in that church girls will justify their lack of interest by blaming God, whether or not God genuinely gave her direction in this regard. Hence, this church filled with normal, single girls you speak of is not one I've yet visited.

      What I *will* say though, is that there's a pretty good way of weeding out the girls who are actually decent people and getting to know them: sign up for service projects. 3,000 people attended my church weekly. When it was time for the semi-annual church work day where we'd rake leaves, mop floors, reorganize cabinets, run wires, etc., on the good years we'd end up with MAYBE 25 people. Some of the most fun times I've ever had at the church were spent in the kitchen slicing 50 pound bags of onions and potatoes as we threw a banquet for several hundred homeless people in our area. Again, a church of 3,000, but a dozen people helping in the kitchen and having a blast in the process. The people who showed up for those kinds of events were there to actually help out others and were willing to sacrifice their time to do it. A resistance to doing those kinds of things when one's day is otherwise uncommitted speaks louder about that person than even the most complete profile on eHarmony - but the opposite is also true. I met more than one of my best friends through those kinds of things, and even if things don't work out, or you have one of those random silences that would be problematic and awkward if done on a first date, the worst case scenario is that you've got organized cabinets, a pan of chopped onions, or a yard whose leaves are raked. On top of that, when you're performing an activity together, it helps with the other issue that I frequently have - when sharing a task, you're all but guaranteed to find something to talk about without guessing if the other person can relate.

    6. Re:Absolutely don't date a developer (for men) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Agreed. If you want to meet a girl, you have to go meet LOTS of girls in varying social settings. Whether it's church, night classes at the local college, the local bar/pub, a theater group, a community orchestra, local beer league sports, the key is, "go out, get involved with other people, and introduce yourself to the women you meet, and the guys you meet too." (Those guys might have single female friends, sisters, girlfriends with friends... you never know.)

      You're going to get turned down by (or be fundamentally not that attracted to) MOST of the women you meet. The key thing to remember in that case is, it's not personal - if she's not interested, she's not interested, and you can move on to talking to the next girl. If you're not interested, and she is, then let her down nicely, and try to remain friendly - she might have friends, and bad word-of-mouth will haunt you.

      Your chances aren't necessarily "better" at church than anywhere else, but they're about 100% better at church than they are sitting at home, alone, reading slashdot.

    7. Re:Absolutely don't date a developer (for men) by neminem · · Score: 1

      Unless your perfect girl is the sort of person who sits at home alone (or with you :p), reading slashdot (or equivalent sites). In which case I recommend okcupid. (Because that's where most of the people like that hang out, assuming they're looking for a partner to be antisocial and shun the world with.)

    8. Re:Absolutely don't date a developer (for men) by dkleinsc · · Score: 2

      Church is recommended for the ~1% of Slashdotters who actually have a religion. Lots of normal females to meet there.

      For the atheists, be aware your views would be welcome at a Unitarian Universalist church too. Just be aware they welcome theists of all stripes as well.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    9. Re:Absolutely don't date a developer (for men) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck accounting, the babes are all in Marketing

    10. Re:Absolutely don't date a developer (for men) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also for atheists, please be aware that when you try to share their "deep thoughts" and "insights" about how "fucking stupid all these believers are to believe in their fairy godfather sky daddy bullshit," you often come across like:

      1) this obnoxious cuntbag: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEIbUWyg8RI
      2) this pathetic creature: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0sawTzHwtc

      It's possible to be an atheist and not enrage the people around you into wanting to choke you out with a strapon dildo, but you should probably not expect people, even at a UU church, to be happy about being ranted at by a fat neckbeard.

    11. Re:Absolutely don't date a developer (for men) by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Unless your perfect girl is the sort of person who sits at home alone (or with you :p), reading slashdot (or equivalent sites). In which case I recommend okcupid. (Because that's where most of the people like that hang out, assuming they're looking for a partner to be antisocial and shun the world with).

      This is very much a YMMV (says the person waiting for his fiancee to get home from a rehearsal for a play coming up next month). Another interesting date from OKC was a (smoking hot) law student and serial entrepreneur -- frankly, I might have pressed more for a follow-up if it had felt more like a date and less like a competition over who had the more interesting career (and that would be her, by quite a long shot).

      Back to the fiancee -- when she was first introducing me to her friends, they were utterly flabbergasted to learn that was where we met, since "nobody" finds Mr/Mrs Right on OKCupid. That said, our relationship otherwise isn't topical -- completely different fields; her various careers have included catering, jewelrymaking, acting (mostly stage and a few indie films), teaching, nannying... the closest thing we have to an overlapping skillset is entry-level DBA work.

      Frankly, I quite like that we have large areas of knowledge that overlap very little -- there's a very great deal I can learn just from being around her, which is something I quite enjoy. I dated an electrical engineer for a bit in college, and found that most of the places where our knowledge bases overlapped tended to be points of friction.

    12. Re:Absolutely don't date a developer (for men) by neminem · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm not saying you can't find all manner of people on OKC (it seems to be the spot for eccentrics of all variety, the nerdy shy computery type only being one subset. A subset I was looking for (I'm sitting here next to her right now; she's playing an internet game :p)), but certainly not the only type.

      I like that we're not obsessed with *all* the same things, so we can learn from each other in that manner, but I wouldn't want only minor overlap, either.

    13. Re:Absolutely don't date a developer (for men) by TranquilVoid · · Score: 1

      The majority of the girls with whom I spent my adolescence with in church would say, "I don't feel led to date you"

      I think this is heavily dependent on the type of church as to how much 'spiritual direction' is required for these decisions, unless they were just looking for an easy let-down.

      The one advantage you have as a male is that churches tend to be over-represented by females. To be a little cynical, as you, and they, age girls will become more pragmatic and less prone to romanticising relationships. Guys perhaps suffer less from this early on as promiscuity can be emotional, not just sexual, although that could be a form of romanticism. Honestly I dont' know, I've never understood people :)

    14. Re:Absolutely don't date a developer (for men) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing normal about believing in nothing.

      See, opinions differ.

  16. Old Saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Don't get your Honey, where you get your Money!

  17. This falls into the category of by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    Never shit where you eat. It's served the animal kingdom well enough for eons and by god, it should be the same in any I.T. shop.

    1. Re:This falls into the category of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Never shit where you eat. It's served the animal kingdom well enough for eons and by god, it should be the same in any I.T. shop.

      Actually I am pretty sure it falls under "rejected letters to penthouse" with a slightly, um, 'redacted' ending. The story was the shortest, most predictable bit of fiction I have seen since Kim Kardashian's wedding. There is nothing there even remotely unique to IT or technology, much less programming.

    2. Re:This falls into the category of by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Never shit where you eat. It's served the animal kingdom well enough for eons and by god, it should be the same in any I.T. shop.

      How do you explain cows then?

      I know many people who have spent time around cows which will tell me a cow will shit in its water bucket, on its food, on itself, and pretty much anywhere else it can manage.

      It's a nice guide, but I'm not convinced the animal kingdom is that aware of it. But maybe it's just cows. :-P

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:This falls into the category of by karnal · · Score: 1

      The cows are secretly trying to poison themselves to take themselves out of the food chain for the Earth.

      --
      Karnal
    4. Re:This falls into the category of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I agree that relationships at work can easily be problematic, I would like to point out that many animals eat their own poop and therefore do shit where they eat.

  18. On a serious note.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Studies have shown that the risk of kids having Autistic spectrum disorders is drastically increased when both parents are borderline Aspergers or whatever (this shouldn't really come as a surprise). So it may be a very good idea for programmers to aim as high as they can when finding a spouse and try to get someone who at least has a normal amount of extroversion. If that's not possible and you do end up with someone of a similar personality, candidly assess your own mental state and think seriously about the risk/reward of having your own kids.

    1. Re:On a serious note.. by neminem · · Score: 1

      I have seen those studies, and they are interesting.

      That said, as someone with supposedly high-functioning Aspergers, I'm generally attracted to other people who are also similar; furthermore, I have a feeling if I was ever a dad, I'd be a better dad to a kid whose brain I understood better, too. So I'm not seeing that as completely a bad thing. :p

      (Obviously, having a kid with crazy Autism would suck horribly for both me and the kid, but I honestly don't really think that kind of crazy Autism is even -related- to the generally-socially-awkward-and-kinda-eccentric high-functioning Aspergers that is common among programmers and other geekish professions, and I haven't really seen any evidence stating otherwise. People just call them a spectrum cause... they're a spectrum along social awkwardness, I guess? I'm not even entirely convinced the diagnosis of "Aspergers" is a single thing, as opposed to just a broad range of "abnormalities" given one label for convenience of discussion.)

    2. Re:On a serious note.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Studies have shown that the risk of kids having Autistic spectrum disorders is drastically increased when both parents are borderline Aspergers "..

      Dr. Bob will tell you it's just the sub-luxations that need to be fixed.

    3. Re:On a serious note.. by DerekLyons · · Score: 0

      candidly assess your own mental state

      Since they've already decided they have "Aspergers or whatever", this is pretty much a useless admonition. They've already demonstrated an inability to "candidly asses their mental state".

    4. Re:On a serious note.. by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Kanners and Asperger's are not related genetically as far as we can tell. They are a spectrum of severity, not a spectrum of causality.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    5. Re:On a serious note.. by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      We need MORE human beings with Asperger's for the next 500 years or so, not fewer.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    6. Re:On a serious note.. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I do think Autism/Aspergers are related. I always think of Autism as introverted to the point of not even knowing how to relate your thoughts to the outside world.

  19. Programmers should NEVER directly interact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There should always be some sort of adapter class between them.

    Please refer to the Ménage pattern for more info.

  20. Drama queens make terrible co-workers by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    No matter what the profession, drama in the workplace, at the level described in TFA, is best reserved for Prime Time TV. It's really annoying to those of us who are actually working.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  21. Don't dip your pen in the company ink by juancnuno · · Score: 1

    Jesus. The problem isn't falling for another developer. The problem is falling for and going out with a developer on your own team which just isn't a good idea.

    Don't dip your pen in the company ink.

    1. Re:Don't dip your pen in the company ink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, pretending "hooking up with another developer" == "a romance within a development team" should make this the stupidest post ever. (Well, it would, but this is /., so there's lots more where that came from...)

  22. nothing to do with 'developers' by hawguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Office romances (especially within the same team) are always bad news. Though the story comes off as a poorly written romance novel - a sort of Shades of Grey fantasy novel for geeks.

    That said, I've dated girls in my field and girls outside of my field, and I've found that I get along better with those outside my field. We don't need work to be our 'common ground', and we don't find ourselves telling each other how to do each other's job. When she tells me about her workday, I don't feel so compelled to tell her how to solve her problem since I have no expertise in her field. And vice-versa. On the flip side, if I'm looking for advice about some specific problem I'm facing, I can't go to her, but that's what friends are for.

    1. Re:nothing to do with 'developers' by assertation · · Score: 1

      I haven't really found dating other programmers to be something special apart from dating non-programmers. I haven't ever been able to articulate why

  23. did I mistype the URL? by udachny · · Score: 1

    I thought I typed /. but it looks like I am on playboy letters to the editor section, and it's not very good.

    I could tell you stories about office situations like that but that's the thing, I don't think people who have stories to tell actually want to tell them to anybody, the world is too small.

  24. Re:Hooking up? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    Yes. Next stupid question?

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  25. Imagine the bedroom banter.... by mcwop · · Score: 1

    while (me=horny)
    {
    service me;
    }

    --

    "I don't think it's selfish, to eat defenseless shellfish." -NOFX

    1. Re:Imagine the bedroom banter.... by NewWorldDan · · Score: 1

      Careful there cowboy. Sloppy syntax can send you into an infinite loop.

    2. Re:Imagine the bedroom banter.... by mcwop · · Score: 1

      That is the funny part, when they start correcting each other. Spewing unintelligible error codes.

      --

      "I don't think it's selfish, to eat defenseless shellfish." -NOFX

    3. Re:Imagine the bedroom banter.... by Bengie · · Score: 1

      Buffer overflow detected. Code was not "safe". Executing unexpected code. Malware detected. Congratulations, it's a girl.

  26. Don't get your meat where you get your bread. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  27. Title unrelated to subject by neminem · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Title made me curious why someone would be claiming developers shouldn't hook up (possibly a new study about the prevalence of high-level autism in the Silicon Valley?) Being a developer who is dating another developer and who might eventually want kids, that would have been potentially relevant.

    But no, this was just another random story of a hot programmer flirting with teammates, which, as a jillion people have aready said, is generally a bad idea whether you're a programmer, or have any other career that involves working in a group. I don't think it'd be any different or less awkward for someone on my team as a developer to hook up with a tester or a graphic designer or a documentation writer on the same team as for them to hook up with another developer.

    Inversely, a while ago I learned one of the testers on our team had requested to move to a different team; a few months later I learned it was because she'd started dating a developer on that team. They've been happily married a couple years now, and both still work here. Probably smart of them to be in different teams, though (though both still on the development floor, which I see nothing wrong with at all.)

    1. Re:Title unrelated to subject by Mia'cova · · Score: 1

      I had something similar. I started dating another dev from the same org. We worked on the same floor and often wandered over to hang out when stressed or bored. It was nice having someone who was on the same product cycle as I was. Crunch time, bug bashes, etc were never an issue, etc.

      The story sounds a whole lot more like the perils of putting a flirty hot girl among a socially awkward group of guys. Obviously she'll be able to take advantage. And while it won't happen every time, it's pretty obvious it'll happen some of the time. Poor guys.

  28. the PERLs of Developers Hooking-Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It all starts-out with that flirtatious morning JAVA, and soon, it's on to PERL necklaces, and RUBY on rings.

  29. Son of Software by carrier+lost · · Score: 3, Funny

    My mother was a web-app, my father was mobile. I am the result of a one-time backend synchronization.

    1. Re:Son of Software by asylumx · · Score: 1

      I don't think a backend sync can result in a child process...

    2. Re:Son of Software by carrier+lost · · Score: 1

      I remember once having a conversation about spawning and reaping children overheard by an admin assistant who got the idea that programming was a pretty violent occupation.

  30. Horrible idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Never date anybody you work with unless you have a routine, easily replaceable job like working in a bar, restaurant, or retail outlet.

    It's a horrible idea to have any type of romance at a serious, white collar job. You're just asking for a sexual harassment dismissal or worse. People are very uptight and paranoid at these jobs. Don't jeopardize your job or anybody else's.

    Find your partner outside your job. That means you'll have to work less hours and make less money. It's a fair trade off for a better sex life.

  31. News for nerds... by jmerlin · · Score: 1

    that doesn't really matter.

  32. Example by Sparticus789 · · Score: 1

    if foo
    then blah
    else foo 2
    #crashes like you do after work -John
    while blah
    #double-check it was actually done, you should try it sometime -Jane

    --
    sudo make me a sandwich
  33. What a load of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That article reads like some kind of Dear Penthouse letter for geeks or something. Even if it's real, the coding had *nothing* to do with that situation...

  34. Re:Hooking up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bannana!!

  35. That story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is not very believable, more like someones dream.

  36. Additional necdotal counterpoints to GP by moogla · · Score: 2

    I also know of two pairs of now-married employees in my corporation are both very similar.
    One such couple are both very narrowly focused in aligned skills and interests, geospatial app development.
    Another such couple are both high-level engineers that do program management.

    I think it just depends on the people. If you put your career first, and then the relationship happens later, then I think it works great! This particular story is one of people getting involved with someone they just met on a particular team, and this particular individual sounds like a leech (and I know of a few in our corporation too, we tell people to stay away from them).

    --
    Black holes are where the Matrix raised SIGFPE
    1. Re:Additional necdotal counterpoints to GP by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

      This is not about coding but about careers in general. There are pluses and minus with having your spouse in the same industry and/or same company. Partly it depends on the people.

      However, for a absolute minus, when a slowdown hits - it hits both people. I have seen cases where they both get the pink slip on the same day.

  37. I bow down before thee... by macbeth66 · · Score: 1

    Although, I have to say, my wife does not like to be grepped. She feels that I'd just be looking for the desired parts...

    Well, duh!

    And use a semi-colon for Dog's sake!

  38. nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because a duplicitous girl caused trouble in your office doesn't at all mean developers hooking up is perilous.

    If I wanted that sort of unfounded extrapolation I would follow politics instead of "news for nerds".

  39. Re:Hooking up? by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 0

    Ok:
    Does touching each others dongs and playing butt-butt count as hooking up?

  40. Don't let this sad tale scare you by SirGarlon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the author is trying to generalize a lesson from that story, he's more naive about women than he claims Jerry is. The moral is not "don't get involved with a colleague," it's "don't get involved with a psycho bitch from hell." A lesson I, personally, had to learn the hard way. :-)

    --
    [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    1. Re:Don't let this sad tale scare you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Judging from what is written it looks to me like Suzanne could be personality disordered. Possibly borderline personality disorder (BPD). These people go through life leaving a wake of tragedy and destruction wherever they go. A lesson I had to learn the hard way too.

  41. What the hell is this article? by Grismar · · Score: 1

    ... 50 Shades of Grey for Developers? It clearly isn't informing us of anything worthwhile and on top of that it is wrong, as others have already pointed out. I can add two more success stories about developers hooking up, getting married and having kids (and still loving each other) just from my own close friends. I myself (a developer) married a mathematician who manages software projects, so I won't count that (although we have been together for 13 years now). A load of crock, this article.

  42. It Was A Documented Affair by nurbles · · Score: 3, Funny

    When I was in the USAF in the '80s I was maintaining a system written by some folks from Sandia Labs in Albequerque. Apparently, two of them were having a bit of an affair (when they visited our site, at least) and they'd taken to leaving notes for each other in the code comments. While those comments didn't help me resolve issues with the code (and there were quite a few) they did occasionally provide some welcome humorous relief while searching for bugs. Especially when a few were found and we tried to match them up without any context or sequence info...

    Good thing their spouses weren't cleared to see the code...

  43. Wow, just wow.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "it's not always a good idea for a programmer to fall for another programmer"

    Um, falling in love is not an "idea" that just springs into your head one day. You don't wake up one morning and decide "hey, you know, I think I'm going to fall in love today."

  44. Out of all the things that never happened by seann · · Score: 0

    ^----

    --
    I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
  45. BPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't about programmers dating programmers, this is about anyone dating someone who has borderline personality disorder. They are like chameleons and will change into whatever you want them to be (becoming your perfect person, loving everything you love etc..) and put you on a pedestal... that is, until the honeymoon period is over. This chick sounds exactly like anyone I've know with it.

  46. Your sample size is... 1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, you're not a statistician. That's forgivable.

    How is this an issue?

    Have you seen your fellow coders? If you divide up the room between "ugly and insecure" and "Not" will the room have an empty side?

    If a girl is 30 lbs overweight, and hard to get to know, but she can kick my ass at TF2, game on.

  47. Misleading TItle by assertation · · Score: 1

    The original article isn't so much about developers hooking up with other developers as it is about the relearning the time tested advice to avoid getting into a romance where you work.

  48. It's just one anecdote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is just a single anecdote. Not all women are manipulative, just as not all men are naïve and malleable. Developers included.

  49. Against HR policy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be more serious than this story deserves, most large companies will have a policy against inter-office 'romance' which would lead to dismissal or relocation.

  50. Re:Hooking up? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    Most likely. If women can practice tribadism, I'm not sure why men can't try. equal rights and all- if you're into the sort of thing that is.

  51. too stupid; didn't read by jlusk4 · · Score: 1

    Sorry -- I couldn't get past the opening line: "She is hot!"

    Ok, now I know the crew. Thanks, Datamation article, we'll call you!

  52. Has nothing to do with being a developer. by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 2

    This has nothing to do with being a developer. Most workplaces discourage or outright ban workplace romances because they rarely work out and the fallout is detrimental to the organization.

    1. Re:Has nothing to do with being a developer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've worked in a place where romances often did work out. It was a pleasant company where people tended to stay for decades, and that produced quite a number of marriages. I'm not aware of a single romantic relationship breaking up that caused serious problems. I am aware of two coworkers who used to be close friends taking a conflict to work, with severe consequences, but that was exceptional. The large majority of problems I've witnessed between coworkers had nothing to do with friendships or romances, and the worst cases were caused by managers incapable of getting along with people.

      Perhaps we should discourage managers.

  53. if i were the author by Eponymous+Hero · · Score: 1

    i would help my naive little coworker out. first, there'd be none of this "but..but.. you're his girlfriend..." she'd get exactly what she asked for (and a lot more) and i'd get pictures (video if she lets me, and she probably will). then i'd show poor jerry and say "your girlfriend's a slut, so i did you a favor. now you can get the upper hand and dump her." and if he's a friend worth keeping, he'll get over it.

    friends don't let friends get strung along for weeks or months by sluts. the author never learned this, but the manager, chuck, did.

    oh, and pics or it didn't happen. it's sad when a code geek turns to harlequin fantasies to prop up his need to feel wanted.

    --
    insensitive clod overlords obligatory xkcd car analogy russian reversals whoosh pedant fanbois ftfy in 3...2...1..PROFIT
  54. Where are all the "pair programming" jokes? by John+Hasler · · Score: 2

    Bad ones, of course.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  55. Re:Hooking up? by Larryish · · Score: 1

    ... tribadism.../quote?

    Rule 34, gentlemen.

  56. This story isn't about programmers by artfulshrapnel · · Score: 2

    This story doesn't really support your claim. This story only proves that manipulative women who hook up with every guy in their workplace are poor relationship material, the fact that she happened to be a programmer is incidental to the story. You can tell because if you replaced "programming" with say... "painting" or "accounting" and change the other terms to match, the story still works exactly the same. I for one am a web developer, as is my girlfriend. We've been together six years and are very happy.

  57. I saw that episode of M*A*S*H by efalk · · Score: 1

    I saw that episode. Henry hooks up with a hot young thing that seems too good to be true, and then she runs around the camp hitting on all the other officers too, stirring up no end of trouble.

    Assuming this story is even true, the only morals to be gleaned are: "If it seems too good to be true, it probably is" and "don't stick it in the crazy". There is nothing to be learned here about relationships and technology.

  58. The Geek Syndrome by Relayman · · Score: 1

    When an autistic person marries another autistic person, they can have profoundly autistic children. Wired Magazine dubbed it The Geek Syndrome.

    So if you're autistic, like many engineers and programmers, try to avoid marrying someone like yourself if you're thinking of having kids.

    --
    If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
  59. For the best by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    Bunnies are better.

  60. Complete and utter bullshit by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

    This reads like a crappy romance novel trying to make a point about how women shouldn't be in IT because they'll destroy team morale. I don't believe it for a second.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  61. Don't get involved romantically with a coworker by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    As someone who ventured down that path I can tell you that almost without fail it ends disastrously. It doesn't matter how much you have in common with that other person or how solid you think the relationship is. Something most likely will go wrong, at least in part due to the abnormal amount of time you're spending together. And when it goes wrong it will likely go very, very, wrong.

    Just. Don't. Do. It.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  62. Nothing to do with geeks by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 2

    "Office romances (especially within the same team) are always bad news. Though the story comes off as a poorly written romance novel - a sort of Shades of Grey fantasy novel for geeks."

    If it's Shades of Grey for geeks, show me the pr0n. It's more like Days of Our Lives, soap opera reruns for bored code monkeys. There's more sex in Twilight than in this drivel. Of course that may be the point. The guy didn't get shagged because he was too busy getting fragged by the girl.

  63. Some people aren't dogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...not to shit where they eat.

    Hooking up with cow-orkers often ends badly -- the line of work has nothing to do with it.

    http://www.uthscsa.edu/mission/article.asp?id=545

    and look up all the husband and wife teams who've done amazing things in science.

    Perhaps the problem is that you're treating your need for a relationship the way you treat your need to defecate.

  64. Nonsense by Robert+Bowles · · Score: 1

    This little tale of immature daring do is utterly irrelevant. At best, it aspires to be Penthouse letters for nerds.

    The snickering inexperience of the men (boys) on the team (author included) is reprehensible and pathetic. Most of the best computer folks I've known in my 20+ years in the computer industry have dated in college, are comfortable and mature around members of the opposite gender, and are or have been married.

    Petty jealousies, misunderstandings about the seriousness of a relationship, love triangles and narcissistic authors are common in all walks of life. The scenario { A and B are friends, A dates C, C gets bored with A and expresses interest with B } exists within every setting, in and out of the computer industry, amoung co-workers, high school friends and brothers.

    I expect this story is just that, a single data point of no statistical significance, an edge condition. The people in it, for practical purposes, don't even exist.

    --
    /* MAGIC THEATRE
    ENTRANCE NOT FOR EVERYBODY
    MADMEN ONLY */
    1. Re:Nonsense by russotto · · Score: 1

      This little tale of immature daring do is utterly irrelevant. At best, it aspires to be Penthouse letters for nerds.

      It's worse than that; read the other "Eric Spiegel" articles at the site. They're apparently all morality plays or cautionary tales, about as credible as the one about the guy who took LSD and stared at the sun.

  65. the aftermath by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    If things don't go well and you break up, your program's comments are going to go downhill fast. They'll be like "declare the array for later use in the inventory function and also, by the way, fuck you"

  66. BSD developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BSD developers Kirk McCusick and Eric Allman seem to have a successful long term relationship.

  67. Only a programmer... by MadKeithV · · Score: 1

    Only a programmer could come up with a *fictional* romance story where the utter pinnacle of the protagonist's romantic achievement is embarrassment at a single stolen kiss.
    It's a bullshit made-up story, it's misogynistic, and it draws a general conclusion from the flimsiest of data. Kill it. With fire. From orbit.

    1. Re:Only a programmer... by Geeky · · Score: 1

      Thank you for saving me the read. Seriously? A single kiss?

      I've seen plenty of casual hookups in the office, many of which led to no complications afterwards - it was just a thing at the Christmas party or whatever. The younger people (I'm over 40, so we're talking 20 - 25) do seem to have a more casual attitude to it than most of my generation. In my experience at least - maybe I just had a sheltered 20s, but it was quite a politically correct era when everything seemed to be taken very seriously.

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
  68. they find her attractive by r00t · · Score: 1

    When a guy feels attraction, but has the social skills of an elementary school kid, this is the sort of thing he may do. He can't resist the thrill of interacting with a real-life pretty woman, but he is unable to properly admit his feelings and/or is unable to properly express them. He regrets it later. He may fantasize about her for months afterward or worse.

  69. extreme but believable by r00t · · Score: 1

    I've seen most of it. I saw a woman go from man to man, though she did seem to be an OK or good worker. I also saw a man have nearly the same success, despite a dire sex ratio working against him.

  70. not really by r00t · · Score: 1

    It's long-term, but not successful. At this point, I don't think we're ever going to see a pregnancy.

  71. Not a problem with them being geeks by kria · · Score: 1

    There are several problems there, but I don't think I'd say any of them are because they're both programmers. 1) Romance within a team is fraught with peril 2) Er, she tried to two-time her boyfriend? She lied a lot? I'm female programmer (oh, shut up) and my ex-husband is a male programmer turned "entrepreneur" or small business owner. Our marriage didn't end because we had too much in common, it ended because of our differences, none of which had to do with work, but with differences in our fundamental goals for the future. I'm dating a man who has a degree in art, and we are together because of how well we relate together, not because "opposites attract" - I may be more left-brained than he is, but we are in no way opposites.