Slashdot Mirror


Google Bans Online Anonymity While Patenting It

theodp writes "'It's important to use your common name,' Google explains in its Google+ ground rules, 'so that the people you want to connect with can find you.' Using a 'secondary online identity,' the search giant adds, is a big Google+ no-no. 'There are lots of places where you can be anonymous online,' Betanews' Joe Wilcox notes. 'Google+ isn't one of them.' Got it. But if online anonymity is so evil, then what's the deal with Google's newly-awarded patent for Social Computing Personas for Protecting Identity in Online Social Interactions? 'When users reveal their identities on the internet,' Google explained to the USPTO in its patent application, 'it leaves them more vulnerable to stalking, identity theft and harassment.' So what's Google's solution? Providing anonymity to social networking users via an 'alter ego' and/or 'anonymous identity.' So does Google now believe that there's a genuine 'risk of disclosing a user's real identity'? Or is this just a case of Google's left hand not knowing what its right hand is patenting?"

7 of 188 comments (clear)

  1. Prior Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I claim it.

  2. Oh, Google is fine with anonymity... by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...so long as they alone know who they really are so the data aggregated goes in the right buckets.

    Nothing's stopping Google+ from offering a secondary ID you can become, while Google still knows who you are.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  3. real identity by skyggen · · Score: 5, Funny

    How can they know who the real me is when I can even answer that question without having a quorum among myself.

  4. Exactly why I'm not on Google+ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "There are lots of places where you can be anonymous online. Google+ isn't one of them."

    Yes, that's why I'm not on Google+ or Facebook.

  5. Re:This BANS others from OFFERING anonymity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This prevents nothing from anyone, really. It's only corporations who have to play in the little corner they painted themselves into.

    Meanwhile the hacker community, hobbyists and all the netizens boldly go where no man has gone before, regardless of what some lawyer says or thinks they're entitled to!

    The patent system has lost its meaning. It's no longer an incentive to create. The single inventor could never afford to patent something, or to defend it in court. The big ones can. Thus patents create artificial barriers of entry and stifle innovation.

    Furthermore, patents are now simply legal weapons used to cement monopolies and prevent innovation from disrupting established revenue streams from stagnated giants who output more Powerpoint fluff than actual progress.

  6. Useful google+ information by ubergeek65536 · · Score: 5, Informative

    To delete your profile:

            Sign in to your Google profile.
            Click Edit profile.
            Click the About tab.
            Click Delete profile and disable Google Buzz completely.
            Click Yes, delete my profile and posts.

  7. But fake names are OK if you're the boss by rudy_wayne · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Or famous.

    The executive in charge of Google+ is Vic Gundotra. But his name isn't really Vic. Mr. Gundrota is Indian and his real first name is Vivek. Yes that's right. The person mandating that you must use your real name, is using a phoney name.

    Then there are the celebrities, like Fifty Cent and Lady Gaga who are allowed to use their fake names.

    Google gets a +1 for hypocrisy.