Slashdot Mirror


xkcd's 13-Gigapixel Webcomic

New submitter Nomen writes "Today's xkcd: Click and Drag (Google Maps version) is probably the world's biggest web comic at an RSI-inducing resolution of 165,888x79,872 pixels. It's made up of 225 different images that take up 5.52MB of space. Now, if only the mines were powered by nethack..."

51 of 193 comments (clear)

  1. In unrelated news, by ocean_soul · · Score: 5, Insightful

    there was a huge, worldwide drop in productivity today. Especially at universities, research labs, software development companies etc.

    1. Re:In unrelated news, by buchner.johannes · · Score: 5, Funny

      And a world-wide increase in carpal tunnel syndrome.

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
  2. Insane by filmorris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How do you do it. Hell, how do you even THINK of doing it. This is so great.

    --
    "Hello, IT... Have you tried turning it off and on again? Yeah... No problem."
  3. Hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Some guy made a keyboard-controllable fullscreen interface: http://ares.aylett.co.uk/xkcd/

  4. Obligatory xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    www.xkcd.com/1110/

    1. Re:Obligatory xkcd by Alyred · · Score: 4, Funny

      Both one of the most amazing, and one of the most annoying webcomics of all time. Loved it.

  5. Re:Not all that impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Your face isn't all that impressive.

  6. Retirement by PrinceAshitaka · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This would be one hell of a last comic before retirement.

    --
    quis custodiet ipsos custodes
  7. Zoomable version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Someone created a zoomable version of today's comic. Makes it a LOT faster to see everything:

    http://xkcd-map.rent-a-geek.de/#1/65/-84

  8. But did you find Waldo? by alexander_686 · · Score: 2

    He's there.

  9. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by fm6 · · Score: 2

    Well, you can always enjoy the initial joke, then bookmark it and come back later. My complaint is that all the clicking and dragging gets boring real fast, and isn't adequately repaid by the little jokes you discover along the way. Maybe it would be more fun on a tablet.

  10. Re:Mother of God by Zocalo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yeah, the GoogleMaps version really sucks for some reason. Try this one instead.

    Note that is privately hosted, and since a Slashdotting is likely to turn his suspicions about hosting costs into reality you might want to consider a donation, or at least a like to help him with the Facebook "Like" for the image linked from the page.

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  11. Re:Not all that impressive by PrinceAshitaka · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    quis custodiet ipsos custodes
  12. Webcomics will come to exploit web tech by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I kinda regret seeing this comic immediately when it became live, as just as the working day had just begun here and I sunk an enormous amount of time into exploring it, but I'm nonetheless thrilled whenever webcomics do something that extends the comic format beyond the limitations of paper.

    Earlier XKCD strips could easily be converted to print format, just see the first collection XKCD Volume 0 that Randall published (yes, he found a way to put the alt text in there too). But taking advantage of HTML and Javascript, making the comic interactive to a degree, feels like something fresh. Cyanide and Happiness have also been employing animated GIF elements. There's a lot of room for creativity in the webcomic format.

    1. Re:Webcomics will come to exploit web tech by ericloewe · · Score: 2

      Look at the bright side (besides new stuff for the format): This would make one hell of a poster.

  13. Re:Mother of God by RenderSeven · · Score: 4, Informative

    Someone has already published a complete zoomable image. Its a bit of a spoiler, but saves a lot of time!

  14. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My buddy wrote up a script that pulls the whole map into a big clickable image: http://hydra.drawert.net/xkcd_clickdrag/

  15. OMG by Master+Moose · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have just found a bigger time waster than Slashdot.

    --
    . . .gone when the morning comes
    1. Re:OMG by tippe · · Score: 2

      Slashdot used to link directly to xkcd (it was in the QuickLinks frame). They stopped that a couple of years ago for some reason. Maybe because the slashdot time waster + xkcd time waster equalled, well, too much wasted time...

  16. Re:Not all that impressive by CCarrot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course it is. It's a digital scavenger hunt :)

    Quite fun, and will probably be the most-bookmarked webcomic of the year as people realize the size of it and flag it for perusal in their off hours.

    Well played Mr. Munroe, well played indeed.

    --
    "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
  17. Re:wow, massive finger cramps... by RenderSeven · · Score: 4, Informative
  18. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by ericloewe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That's easy, try finding these without zooming out:

    2 MD-80s
    2 other airliners, possibly 767s
    Apollo 13
    Two X-Wings

  19. Re:Not all that impressive by Zocalo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Soooo... Glass half empty kind of guy, huh?

    Give Randall some credit, this must have taken ages to put together, and is all the more impressive once you realise that it's more or less all draw to the scale. The real mindfsck is when you read the comment from the girl on the far left and work out that, despite all of that apparently vast area to explore, the whole thing represents is only about five miles from one side to the other. I just didn't expect it [the drawing] to be so small!

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  20. Re:Not all that impressive by UnresolvedExternal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Agreed - can we drop the tetchy comments? In fairness, it was kinda cool...

  21. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Find Icarus ;-)

    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  22. Re:Not all that impressive by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 4, Informative

    The real mindfsck is when you read the comment from the girl on the far left and work out that, despite all of that apparently vast area to explore, the whole thing represents is only about five miles from one side to the other.

    Clever. Another way to work out the dimensions would be to scale it to the Burj Khalifa located in the center.

  23. Re:typifies xkcd by Jeng · · Score: 2

    Hey that is just uncool.

    He might damage a car if he plays in traffic.

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  24. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Facebook? Get out of here.

  25. Re:Not all that impressive by oji-sama · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We are in agreement if by kinda cool you mean one of the coolest, if not the coolest, web comic ever, so far.

    --
    It is what it is.
  26. Re:typifies xkcd by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Funny

    WTF is an "artefact"?

    It's very similar to an artifact, except artefacts are only found by people who don't know what the little red, squiggly line under the word is for.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  27. Randall Munroe is my hero by bziman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I really hope that Randall trolls the internet (or at least slashdot) looking for mentions of his name. It's like having a friend on the internet. He's a genius, and sometimes (well, most of the time), I feel like he's writing and drawing just for me. Thank you.

  28. Re:Not all that impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Really?

    That'll be the day I stop reading it.

  29. Big View in Chrome: by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Informative

    - Right click the comic, select "Inspect Element"

    - in the console, expand the "middleContainer" div

    - select the "comic" div

    - in the box on the right of the console, uncheck "overflow:hidden"

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    1. Re:Big View in Chrome: by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      ^ courtesy xkcd forums

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  30. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by thatotherguy007 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was hoping someone would do something like that. I hope that server can handle some traffic.

    Anyone esle wish that one of the whales in the sky was a flower pot thinking to itself "not again"? (HHGttG)

  31. I feel better by tool462 · · Score: 2

    I, for one, am relieved to know that the bottomless pits in Mario Bros. are not truly bottomless. If any of my Mario's survived the fall, they got to live out their days in comfortable pagodas buried deep within the earth.

  32. Re:wow, massive finger cramps... by idontgno · · Score: 2

    needs a zoom function!

    I've heard this said over 50 times today.

    In a way, it's a clear statement that the speaker doesn't get the point. (Or doesn't care to get the point.)

    The word balloon in the "start position" of the final frame says it all: "I just didn't expect [the world] to be so big."

    Your graphospasms are the webcomic equivalent of becoming footsore after attempting to walk the entire surface of the Earth. Zooming out is implicitly cheating.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  33. Re:typifies xkcd by praxis · · Score: 2

    More accurately, it /is/ an artifact. There are multiple acceptable spellings of artifact.

  34. Re:is it funny? by Translation+Error · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are you sure the whales are flying and not falling? I assumed it was a Hitchhiker's Guide reference.

    Impossible to tell until they reach the ground and we see whether they miss it or not.

    --
    When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
  35. Re:typifies xkcd by xaxa · · Score: 2

    It's the normal British spelling of artefact. No red squiggly line for me :-)

  36. Re:is it funny? by tom17 · · Score: 2

    I was disappointed by the whales. I thought should have been a whale and a bowl of Petunias.

  37. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by Kal+Zekdor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Did the same thing myself the moment I saw the comment. Didn't combine them into a single image, but got every bit of detail within a 100x100 panel square. Nothing was found further than 25 panels from the center, though.

    Here's the python script I threw together. It's crude, but gets the job done. (Note that it needs wget on the path or in the same directory, didn't feel like tinkering with binary writes.)

    import os, urllib

    baseUrl="http://imgs.xkcd.com/clickdrag/"

    def convert(coords):
        st = ''
        if coords[0]>0:
            st+=str(coords[0])+'n'
        else:
            st+=str(abs(coords[0]))+'s'

        if coords[1]>0:
            st+=str(coords[1])+'e'
        else:
            st+=str(abs(coords[1]))+'w'

        st+='.png'

        return st

    x=1
    y=1
    flipX = 1
    flipY = 1
    while True:
        coords = (x*flipX, y*flipY)
        print coords
        u = urllib.urlopen(baseUrl+convert(coords))

        firstLine = True
        img = False
        for line in u:
            if firstLine:
                firstLine = False
                if line == '\x89PNG\r\n':
                    print 'Found Image!'
                    os.spawnl(os.P_WAIT, "wget"," -nc ",baseUrl+convert(coords))
                elif line == '<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>\n':
                    pass
                else:
                    print line
        u.close()
        if flipY==-1:
            flipY = 1
            y+=1
            if y>x:
                y=1
                if flipX==-1:
                    flipX=1
                    x+=1
                else:
                    flipX=-1
        else:
            flipY = -1

  38. Re:Not all that impressive by jIyajbe · · Score: 4, Funny

    Soooo... Glass half empty kind of guy, huh?

    Oblig: http://what-if.xkcd.com/6/

    --
    "Don't blame the log for the fire." --Andrew Ratshin
  39. Re:Not all that impressive by gknoy · · Score: 2

    It was extremely cool, but having to actually scroll all over, combined with a small scrollable window, made my hands hurt enough that I eventually gave up. I'm very thankful for the (multiple) people that repackaged it as a zoomable map.

  40. I have a friend who does images on a similar scale by ksandom · · Score: 2

    When you look at this, take into account that the full resolution is closer to this.

    --
    Funnyhacks - Wierd, unusual, and fun hacks
  41. Re:Not all that impressive by icebraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No life? Drawing XKCD is his job.

  42. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by lucm · · Score: 4, Funny

    You must be one of those persons who read tomorrow's comic on their dilbert calendar.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  43. Re:is it funny? by stepho-wrs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe the whales are a reference to "Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home".

  44. Re:Not all that impressive by steelfood · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's so big. Yet so really, really small when you compare it to the real world. More size comparisons:

    Based on the Burj Khalifa being 829 meters, each image (cell) is about 100 meters.

    The full image is 81 cells wide, 32 cells high. The highest point where the whales are at is 13 cells high (including the initial ground level), while the lowest point is around 19 cells deep (not including the initial ground level).

    Mt. Everest is slightly higher than the image is wide (88.5 cells).

    The deepest mine in the world is about twice the depth of the caves from ground level (39 cells).

    In fact, the deepest hole ever drilled is about six times as deep (122 cells).

    If the jumbo jets' cruise altitude were drawn to scale, they would be close to ten times the height of the whale from ground level (124 cells).

    If this was a map of Manhattan starting at the tip of Battery Park, it would end near the southern parts of Central Park, specifically the whereabouts of the skating rink (according to Google Maps anyway).

    Also, apparently, some forum-goers have found the images at the four 11x11 corners to be blank (present but blank, whereas the rest of the empty space is not an actual image). The theory is that this one, 1110, will be either the last or the penultimate comic (with 1111 being the last comic, or just blank). The last comic theory comes from the obvious reference to Calvin and Hobbes, and a reference to the very first comic at the eastern-most cell. There are more blank images at 1n4e, 1n5e, 2n1w, 2n3w, 8n1w, but its meaning has not been cracked yet.

    --
    "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  45. Re:Not all that impressive by pantaril · · Score: 2

    IMO nicer version: http://xkcd-map.rent-a-geek.de/

  46. Corcovado by Joao · · Score: 2

    The mountain seems to be the famous Corcovado Montain (the one with the big Jesus statue on top) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. See here for comparison.