Slashdot Mirror


xkcd's 13-Gigapixel Webcomic

New submitter Nomen writes "Today's xkcd: Click and Drag (Google Maps version) is probably the world's biggest web comic at an RSI-inducing resolution of 165,888x79,872 pixels. It's made up of 225 different images that take up 5.52MB of space. Now, if only the mines were powered by nethack..."

123 of 193 comments (clear)

  1. In unrelated news, by ocean_soul · · Score: 5, Insightful

    there was a huge, worldwide drop in productivity today. Especially at universities, research labs, software development companies etc.

    1. Re:In unrelated news, by buchner.johannes · · Score: 5, Funny

      And a world-wide increase in carpal tunnel syndrome.

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    2. Re:In unrelated news, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I spent my lunch hour (or two) writing and testing a script because I probably already have an RSI.

  2. Insane by filmorris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How do you do it. Hell, how do you even THINK of doing it. This is so great.

    --
    "Hello, IT... Have you tried turning it off and on again? Yeah... No problem."
    1. Re:Insane by macbeth66 · · Score: 1

      How do you know he isn't? He is on slashdot after all. Oh, wait...

  3. Hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Some guy made a keyboard-controllable fullscreen interface: http://ares.aylett.co.uk/xkcd/

  4. Obligatory xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    www.xkcd.com/1110/

    1. Re:Obligatory xkcd by Alyred · · Score: 4, Funny

      Both one of the most amazing, and one of the most annoying webcomics of all time. Loved it.

  5. Mother of God by danbert8 · · Score: 1

    It will take all day to explore this whole thing using the Google Maps version, I can't imagine finding everything using the dragging method.

    --
    Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    1. Re:Mother of God by Zocalo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, the GoogleMaps version really sucks for some reason. Try this one instead.

      Note that is privately hosted, and since a Slashdotting is likely to turn his suspicions about hosting costs into reality you might want to consider a donation, or at least a like to help him with the Facebook "Like" for the image linked from the page.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    2. Re:Mother of God by buchner.johannes · · Score: 1
      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    3. Re:Mother of God by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      Probably because every nerd on the internet just got the link from Slashdot and is likely melting the server as we speak. It doesn't seem like it's actually hosted by Google.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    4. Re:Mother of God by RenderSeven · · Score: 4, Informative

      Someone has already published a complete zoomable image. Its a bit of a spoiler, but saves a lot of time!

    5. Re:Mother of God by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      You just need more monitors. It's almost manageable at 7680x1440. The GM version, that is.

  6. Thumbnail? by joebok · · Score: 1

    Anybody create or know of a thumbnail of the whole thing? I don't want to miss anything!

    That comic should have been put out on a Friday - I only like to waste a lot of time on Fridays. I can only afford a cursory amount of wasted time on a Wednesday. All that clicking and dragging used up most of it, so I'll have to cut this /. post short.

    1. Re:Thumbnail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/images/3/3d/1110_full_tiny.png

  7. wow, massive finger cramps... by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

    only got a fraction of the way through it when my index and middle finger started to seize up like an engine without oil.

    needs a zoom function!

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    1. Re:wow, massive finger cramps... by RenderSeven · · Score: 4, Informative
    2. Re:wow, massive finger cramps... by idontgno · · Score: 2

      needs a zoom function!

      I've heard this said over 50 times today.

      In a way, it's a clear statement that the speaker doesn't get the point. (Or doesn't care to get the point.)

      The word balloon in the "start position" of the final frame says it all: "I just didn't expect [the world] to be so big."

      Your graphospasms are the webcomic equivalent of becoming footsore after attempting to walk the entire surface of the Earth. Zooming out is implicitly cheating.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    3. Re:wow, massive finger cramps... by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

      i'd be more than footsore if i tried to walk the earth my friend!

      fortunately we have google earth to view the world, which is the exact metaphor of the google eath overlay!

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    4. Re:wow, massive finger cramps... by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Not sure if it's a good thing that I saw most of the content yesterday by clicking and dragging. It took quite a while. I missed the stuff in the sky, but saw all the underground and surface events.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  8. Re:Not all that impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Your face isn't all that impressive.

  9. Retirement by PrinceAshitaka · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This would be one hell of a last comic before retirement.

    --
    quis custodiet ipsos custodes
  10. Zoomable version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Someone created a zoomable version of today's comic. Makes it a LOT faster to see everything:

    http://xkcd-map.rent-a-geek.de/#1/65/-84

  11. But did you find Waldo? by alexander_686 · · Score: 2

    He's there.

    1. Re:But did you find Waldo? by XDirtypunkX · · Score: 1

      As is his cane.

    2. Re:But did you find Waldo? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      No, but my g/f's name is Becki. That was a nice coincidence :)

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    3. Re:But did you find Waldo? by anyGould · · Score: 1

      That's whose cane it is? I saw the cane, but didn't make the connection.

      Wonder if there'll ever be a poster version of it. (Probably multiple posters you have to assemble yourself..)

  12. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by fm6 · · Score: 2

    Well, you can always enjoy the initial joke, then bookmark it and come back later. My complaint is that all the clicking and dragging gets boring real fast, and isn't adequately repaid by the little jokes you discover along the way. Maybe it would be more fun on a tablet.

  13. Re:Not all that impressive by PrinceAshitaka · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    quis custodiet ipsos custodes
  14. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

    Did you find Super Mario Bros?

    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  15. Webcomics will come to exploit web tech by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I kinda regret seeing this comic immediately when it became live, as just as the working day had just begun here and I sunk an enormous amount of time into exploring it, but I'm nonetheless thrilled whenever webcomics do something that extends the comic format beyond the limitations of paper.

    Earlier XKCD strips could easily be converted to print format, just see the first collection XKCD Volume 0 that Randall published (yes, he found a way to put the alt text in there too). But taking advantage of HTML and Javascript, making the comic interactive to a degree, feels like something fresh. Cyanide and Happiness have also been employing animated GIF elements. There's a lot of room for creativity in the webcomic format.

    1. Re:Webcomics will come to exploit web tech by ericloewe · · Score: 2

      Look at the bright side (besides new stuff for the format): This would make one hell of a poster.

    2. Re:Webcomics will come to exploit web tech by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      the solution is: be able to print any 1 section of the comic that you particularly love as a poster.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  16. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My buddy wrote up a script that pulls the whole map into a big clickable image: http://hydra.drawert.net/xkcd_clickdrag/

  17. Drag click drag click by DeTech · · Score: 1

    I wasted 45 mins dragging around this morning. There's plenty of stuff hanging around and the jokes make it well worth the global productivity drop.

  18. OMG by Master+Moose · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have just found a bigger time waster than Slashdot.

    --
    . . .gone when the morning comes
    1. Re:OMG by tippe · · Score: 2

      Slashdot used to link directly to xkcd (it was in the QuickLinks frame). They stopped that a couple of years ago for some reason. Maybe because the slashdot time waster + xkcd time waster equalled, well, too much wasted time...

  19. Re:Not all that impressive by CCarrot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course it is. It's a digital scavenger hunt :)

    Quite fun, and will probably be the most-bookmarked webcomic of the year as people realize the size of it and flag it for perusal in their off hours.

    Well played Mr. Munroe, well played indeed.

    --
    "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
  20. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by ericloewe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That's easy, try finding these without zooming out:

    2 MD-80s
    2 other airliners, possibly 767s
    Apollo 13
    Two X-Wings

  21. Re:Not all that impressive by Zocalo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Soooo... Glass half empty kind of guy, huh?

    Give Randall some credit, this must have taken ages to put together, and is all the more impressive once you realise that it's more or less all draw to the scale. The real mindfsck is when you read the comment from the girl on the far left and work out that, despite all of that apparently vast area to explore, the whole thing represents is only about five miles from one side to the other. I just didn't expect it [the drawing] to be so small!

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  22. Ooh, look, a Google Maps Version linked from /. by milbournosphere · · Score: 1

    In other news, openmarket's servers just went down in flames.

  23. Re:Not all that impressive by UnresolvedExternal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Agreed - can we drop the tetchy comments? In fairness, it was kinda cool...

  24. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by synnthetic · · Score: 1

    I did a couple screen shots and made the Mario Bros level my facebook cover picture

  25. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Find Icarus ;-)

    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  26. Another Google Maps Style Version by nightstar007 · · Score: 1

    http://servicesbeta.esri.com/demos/web-tiled/xkcd-1110.html Totally amazing work, my favorite XKCD. Now if someone turns it into a game...

    --
    ~M "There is no moral precept that does not have something inconvenient about it." - Denis Diderot
  27. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by ericloewe · · Score: 1

    I knew I had forgotten something!

  28. Re:Not all that impressive by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 4, Informative

    The real mindfsck is when you read the comment from the girl on the far left and work out that, despite all of that apparently vast area to explore, the whole thing represents is only about five miles from one side to the other.

    Clever. Another way to work out the dimensions would be to scale it to the Burj Khalifa located in the center.

  29. Re:typifies xkcd by Jeng · · Score: 2

    Hey that is just uncool.

    He might damage a car if he plays in traffic.

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  30. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by Garridan · · Score: 1

    Yeah... I read the source, and downloaded the images. Who the hell has time for all that mouse work?

  31. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Facebook? Get out of here.

  32. Re:Not all that impressive by oji-sama · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We are in agreement if by kinda cool you mean one of the coolest, if not the coolest, web comic ever, so far.

    --
    It is what it is.
  33. Re:typifies xkcd by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Funny

    WTF is an "artefact"?

    It's very similar to an artifact, except artefacts are only found by people who don't know what the little red, squiggly line under the word is for.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  34. Randall Munroe is my hero by bziman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I really hope that Randall trolls the internet (or at least slashdot) looking for mentions of his name. It's like having a friend on the internet. He's a genius, and sometimes (well, most of the time), I feel like he's writing and drawing just for me. Thank you.

    1. Re:Randall Munroe is my hero by IronChef · · Score: 1

      I wonder if Kibo still scours Usenet?

    2. Re:Randall Munroe is my hero by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1

      Did you mean "trawls"?

    3. Re:Randall Munroe is my hero by bziman · · Score: 1

      I might have, if I weren't making an internet pun... right?

  35. Re:Not all that impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Really?

    That'll be the day I stop reading it.

  36. Big View in Chrome: by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Informative

    - Right click the comic, select "Inspect Element"

    - in the console, expand the "middleContainer" div

    - select the "comic" div

    - in the box on the right of the console, uncheck "overflow:hidden"

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    1. Re:Big View in Chrome: by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      ^ courtesy xkcd forums

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  37. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by thatotherguy007 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was hoping someone would do something like that. I hope that server can handle some traffic.

    Anyone esle wish that one of the whales in the sky was a flower pot thinking to itself "not again"? (HHGttG)

  38. Re:Not all that impressive by sconeu · · Score: 1

    Or the Saturn V just above it.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  39. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    There are other references to video games. Some of the caves look like the underground map in Another World.

  40. I feel better by tool462 · · Score: 2

    I, for one, am relieved to know that the bottomless pits in Mario Bros. are not truly bottomless. If any of my Mario's survived the fall, they got to live out their days in comfortable pagodas buried deep within the earth.

  41. Randall is truly evil by sconeu · · Score: 1

    In a good way....

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  42. Hahaha by platypusfriend · · Score: 1

    Poop Deck.

  43. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by Archenoth · · Score: 1

    There was also a Minecraft Creeper chasing a miner...

    References are everywhere.

    --
    The arch foe.
  44. Re:and xkcd-sucks.blogspot.com by Archenoth · · Score: 1

    I investigated this, I really wish I hadn't...

    Not because I wasn't expecting it, but because it wasn't scaled to epic proportions so I did it for pretty much nothing... :(

    --
    The arch foe.
  45. scavenger hunt! by v1 · · Score: 1

    Someone needs to arrange a scavenger hunt list for this image. I'll get you started:

    find two x-wings
    find three whales
    find one submarine
    find three comets

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:scavenger hunt! by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      I know I found a blue whale, an x-wing and the submarine (it was subterranean).

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    2. Re:scavenger hunt! by riT-k0MA · · Score: 1

      Those aren't comets; they're Red Spiders.

  46. Re:typifies xkcd by honestmonkey · · Score: 1

    Eye preefur peepil unnerstan whut eyme seyin. Dondt ewe?

    --
    Everything you know is wrong, Just forget the words and sing along.
  47. Re:typifies xkcd by praxis · · Score: 2

    More accurately, it /is/ an artifact. There are multiple acceptable spellings of artifact.

  48. Commander Mark by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the PBS show Secret City, hosted by COMMANDER MARK!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrnwNFmdxvM

    I loved his pen murals.

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
  49. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by Eponymous+Hero · · Score: 1

    so i could go to the click and drag episode, find your mario bros tile, look up the png name in the developer toolbar, then take the png and drag it into a google image search and presto, there you are.

    --
    insensitive clod overlords obligatory xkcd car analogy russian reversals whoosh pedant fanbois ftfy in 3...2...1..PROFIT
  50. Re:is it funny? by Translation+Error · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are you sure the whales are flying and not falling? I assumed it was a Hitchhiker's Guide reference.

    Impossible to tell until they reach the ground and we see whether they miss it or not.

    --
    When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
  51. Magnum Opus by ivoras · · Score: 1

    This is Randall's Magnum Opus.

    --
    -- Sig down
  52. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    See if your buddy can add a gray background color, to make it easier to find clickable areas in the 'sky'

  53. Re:typifies xkcd by xaxa · · Score: 2

    It's the normal British spelling of artefact. No red squiggly line for me :-)

  54. Re:typifies xkcd by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    More accurately, it /is/ an artifact. There are multiple acceptable spellings of artifact.

    Ha, yea, I actually remembered that shortly after hitting the submit button. Where's a time-limited edit button when you need one?

    My high school English teacher is probably spinning in her grave...

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  55. Re:typifies xkcd by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    Still funny, though.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  56. Re:is it funny? by tom17 · · Score: 2

    I was disappointed by the whales. I thought should have been a whale and a bowl of Petunias.

  57. Re:typifies xkcd by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    I love the way you crafted this slam without actually specifying what you consider to be "modern culture", other than that you agree with the xkcd fans that Lady Gaga doesn't qualify. All the reward, none of the risk. Excellent.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  58. Re:Not all that impressive by UnresolvedExternal · · Score: 1

    Yep indeed - so far - I hear there are ponies in it but I haven't found them yet

  59. Childhood memories by phrank · · Score: 1

    When I was a bit younger, I used to draw labyrinths in MS Paint, zoom in and try to find the way out, sometimes cheating with Ariadnes red 1 pixel line. Well, I was never good at football.

  60. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by Kal+Zekdor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Did the same thing myself the moment I saw the comment. Didn't combine them into a single image, but got every bit of detail within a 100x100 panel square. Nothing was found further than 25 panels from the center, though.

    Here's the python script I threw together. It's crude, but gets the job done. (Note that it needs wget on the path or in the same directory, didn't feel like tinkering with binary writes.)

    import os, urllib

    baseUrl="http://imgs.xkcd.com/clickdrag/"

    def convert(coords):
        st = ''
        if coords[0]>0:
            st+=str(coords[0])+'n'
        else:
            st+=str(abs(coords[0]))+'s'

        if coords[1]>0:
            st+=str(coords[1])+'e'
        else:
            st+=str(abs(coords[1]))+'w'

        st+='.png'

        return st

    x=1
    y=1
    flipX = 1
    flipY = 1
    while True:
        coords = (x*flipX, y*flipY)
        print coords
        u = urllib.urlopen(baseUrl+convert(coords))

        firstLine = True
        img = False
        for line in u:
            if firstLine:
                firstLine = False
                if line == '\x89PNG\r\n':
                    print 'Found Image!'
                    os.spawnl(os.P_WAIT, "wget"," -nc ",baseUrl+convert(coords))
                elif line == '<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>\n':
                    pass
                else:
                    print line
        u.close()
        if flipY==-1:
            flipY = 1
            y+=1
            if y>x:
                y=1
                if flipX==-1:
                    flipX=1
                    x+=1
                else:
                    flipX=-1
        else:
            flipY = -1

  61. Re:Not all that impressive by jIyajbe · · Score: 4, Funny

    Soooo... Glass half empty kind of guy, huh?

    Oblig: http://what-if.xkcd.com/6/

    --
    "Don't blame the log for the fire." --Andrew Ratshin
  62. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    Since the images only take up 5.52mb, I'd say it should be okay (if implemented well).

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  63. The statistics by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    165,888x79,872 pixels.

    Wow!

    It's made up of 225 different images

    Wow.

    that take up 5.52MB of space.

    W- meh.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:The statistics by the_other_chewey · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but take into accountthat this is the compressed size – and it uses 1bit
      "colour", so it compresses really well. Uncompressed, it's quite a bit more.

    2. Re:The statistics by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Looks like 8-bit to me (maybe 4-bit). I just enjoyed the contrast of the big number, the mediocre number, and the boringly small one at the end.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  64. Re:Not all that impressive by gknoy · · Score: 2

    It was extremely cool, but having to actually scroll all over, combined with a small scrollable window, made my hands hurt enough that I eventually gave up. I'm very thankful for the (multiple) people that repackaged it as a zoomable map.

  65. Re:Not all that impressive by EdIII · · Score: 1

    The fact this got modded +5 Insightful makes the burn all that more impressive.

    Ohh, and the guy in the grass is masturbating.

  66. I have a friend who does images on a similar scale by ksandom · · Score: 2

    When you look at this, take into account that the full resolution is closer to this.

    --
    Funnyhacks - Wierd, unusual, and fun hacks
  67. Re:Not all that impressive by icebraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No life? Drawing XKCD is his job.

  68. Lode Runner? by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

    Randall must have played too many games back in the day.

  69. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by lucm · · Score: 4, Funny

    You must be one of those persons who read tomorrow's comic on their dilbert calendar.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  70. art by brucer42 · · Score: 1

    Take your time. scroll around. let those associatrons work. look at the walls. Rorschach is hiding somewhere. Take your time. There's galleries in this gallery, matey. Obligatory ITLAP.

  71. Re:Not all that impressive by chebucto · · Score: 1

    Ohh, and the guy in the grass is masturbating.

    On a related note, Randall watches Peep Show.

    --
    The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
  72. For the impatient... by seandiggity · · Score: 1

    ...like me, here's a zoomable version. As for the comic itself, the idea isn't genius, but the implementation is very smart.

    --
    Geeks like to think that they can ignore politics, you can leave politics alone, but politics won't leave you alone.-rms
  73. Re:is it funny? by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

    Only there are 2 whales (falling) and no bowl of petunias.

    There were of course two missiles in the source material.

    --
    Sara
    Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  74. Re:Not all that impressive by EdIII · · Score: 1

    On a related note, Randall watches Peep Show.

    Fucko, we like to call it inter-species erotica.

  75. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by T-Bucket · · Score: 1

    You forgot the Q400 in a drastic nose-up pitch. (possibly about to stall)

  76. Locations by koshatul · · Score: 1

    I added some code by jywarren to do a hashbang with location, so you can copy/paste references to direct locations. (latitude/longtitude/zoom reference)

    http://code.nervhq.com/xkcd_map/

  77. Randall, what project are you avoiding... by CityZen · · Score: 1

    that you had to do this instead? Clearly, it must be something big.

    And just how did you do it? Did you just use Gimp, find some nice images to threshold, cut and paste, or did you set up a custom pipeline?

    (Note regarding tone of this message: please read with "awe", not "sarcasm".)

  78. Re:is it funny? by stepho-wrs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe the whales are a reference to "Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home".

  79. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I was disappointed because it comes up blank for me. Maybe it requires JavaScript, but I'm not going to whitelist some unknown, random web comic site.

    Oh well, too bad for them.

  80. Mouse wheel tilt left/right by aapold · · Score: 1

    I finally found a use for it.

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
  81. Re:Not all that impressive by steelfood · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's so big. Yet so really, really small when you compare it to the real world. More size comparisons:

    Based on the Burj Khalifa being 829 meters, each image (cell) is about 100 meters.

    The full image is 81 cells wide, 32 cells high. The highest point where the whales are at is 13 cells high (including the initial ground level), while the lowest point is around 19 cells deep (not including the initial ground level).

    Mt. Everest is slightly higher than the image is wide (88.5 cells).

    The deepest mine in the world is about twice the depth of the caves from ground level (39 cells).

    In fact, the deepest hole ever drilled is about six times as deep (122 cells).

    If the jumbo jets' cruise altitude were drawn to scale, they would be close to ten times the height of the whale from ground level (124 cells).

    If this was a map of Manhattan starting at the tip of Battery Park, it would end near the southern parts of Central Park, specifically the whereabouts of the skating rink (according to Google Maps anyway).

    Also, apparently, some forum-goers have found the images at the four 11x11 corners to be blank (present but blank, whereas the rest of the empty space is not an actual image). The theory is that this one, 1110, will be either the last or the penultimate comic (with 1111 being the last comic, or just blank). The last comic theory comes from the obvious reference to Calvin and Hobbes, and a reference to the very first comic at the eastern-most cell. There are more blank images at 1n4e, 1n5e, 2n1w, 2n3w, 8n1w, but its meaning has not been cracked yet.

    --
    "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  82. art by Tom · · Score: 1

    This was one of the coolest things I found on the Internet since quite a while.

    And, despite the RSI-effect and all, it kind of loses something in the various maps, deep zoom, etc. versions. As soon as you can zoom, it doesn't have the scale/size feeling anymore. Something is lost.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  83. Re:Not all that impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    About the plane, it's flying with wheels out so it's probably going down for landing. IE any altitude is valid.
    Also, just to be a tard, it's not a "Jumbo Jet". That is usually what you call a Boeing 747, and the second floor is missing.
    Sorry. I just had to get it out of my system.

  84. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by The+Rizz · · Score: 1
  85. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by FlameWise · · Score: 1

    Hehe, someone quoted the X-Wing calling a Red pilot and I'm going no wait, wasn't the X-Wing calling Gold Leader?

    Then someone else said he'd started going west and I'd been exploring east, but was coming back through the tunnels and was wondering whether we'd meet, and we discovered we actually were just going through the same landcape.

    Would be cool if you could see others exploring multi-player style, but too hard to code I suppose.

  86. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by Maavin · · Score: 1

    1n35e.png: my new Wallpaper :)

    --


    Crivens! I kicked meself in me own heid!
  87. Drawing by ledow · · Score: 1

    When I was younger, my brother and I would often have a sort of pseudo-game for those rainy afternoons.

    We would draw a simplified piece of terrain on A4 paper, usually just a wobbly line that went up and down (a bit like a Scorched Earth kinda outline, similar to the game we used to play on the Spectrum: Tank Trax).

    Then we'd fill it it with various stick figures, with various comedy elements. With two of you, you could work on different bits and then show each other what you'd done and tie it in with the other drawings on there. And because half was mountain, half was sky, there was opportunity for all kinds of things. Some of the things we used to include were:

    A "cave" with no entrance/exits in it, and a stick-figure either bored or skeletal within in (how he got there, we never explained), something like a sports car "jumping" off a ramp in the terrain, maybe a little water somewhere collecting in a small valley and "dripping through" or cracking the "rock" below it, a little mine with stick figures pushing carts along rails, etc.

    This very much reminds me of those drawings we used to do, on a much larger scale, even down to having odd little characters every now and then and a mine system.

  88. Re:Not all that impressive by cyborg_zx · · Score: 1

    This comic is very morish.

  89. Re:I was actually disappointed by this. by BillCable · · Score: 1

    I did it with nested loops in ColdFusion. There are 33 "w" lengths and 48 "e" lengths. 11 "n" and 19 "s". Had to limit the outer loop because my server would time out, but with a bit of grinding I was able to generate a list of all the tiles.

    <cfloop from="19" to="20" index="y">
    <cfloop from="1" to="33" index="x">

    <cfset testUrl="http://imgs.xkcd.com/clickdrag/#y#s#x#w.png">

    <cfhttp method="head" url="#testUrl#"
    resolveurl="no" throwonerror="no" />

    <!--- Check if no status code or status code 404 --->
    <cfif NOT IsDefined("cfhttp.responseheader.status_code")
    OR cfhttp.responseheader.status_code EQ "404">
    <cfset result=false>
    <cfelse>
    <cfoutput><a href="#testUrl#">#testUrl#</a></cfoutput><br />
    </cfif>
    </cfloop>
    </cfloop>

  90. Re:Not all that impressive by pantaril · · Score: 2

    IMO nicer version: http://xkcd-map.rent-a-geek.de/

  91. Re:Not all that impressive by hattom · · Score: 1

    Just because I feel like it... I think you mean any positive altitude is valid. And given the type of plane, probably not in space either.

    But yeah, I know what you mean ;)

  92. Re:Not all that impressive by chebucto · · Score: 1

    That's what I was referring to :)

    --
    The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
  93. Corcovado by Joao · · Score: 2

    The mountain seems to be the famous Corcovado Montain (the one with the big Jesus statue on top) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. See here for comparison.

  94. Re:is it funny? by CommieLib · · Score: 1

    I thought perhaps the flying whales in the Pines of Rome sequence from Fantasia 2000.

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
  95. Re:is it funny? by NoseyNick · · Score: 1

    I found the petunias first, and didn't get the reference until I saw the whales. There's plenty of missiles too, but nowhere near the whales (yet?)

    --
    Nick Waterman, Sr Tech Director, #include <stddisclaimer>