Slashdot Mirror


Apple's Secret Plan To Join iPhones With Airport Security

Hugh Pickens writes "Currently — as most of us know — TSA agents briefly examine government ID and boarding passes as each passenger presents their documents at a checkpoint at the end of a security line. Thom Patterson writes at CNN that under a 2008 Apple patent application that was approved in July and filed under the working title "iTravel," a traveler's phone would automatically send electronic identification to a TSA agent as soon as the traveler got in line and as each traveler waits in line. TSA agents would examine the electronic ID at an electronic viewing station. Next, at the X-ray stations, a traveler's phone would confirm to security agents that the traveler's ID had already been checked. Apple's patent calls for the placement of special kiosks (PDF) around the airport which will automatically exchange data with your phone via a close range wireless technology called near field communication (NFC). Throughout the process, the phone photo could be displayed on a screen for comparison with the traveler. Facial recognition software could be included in the process. Several experts say a key question that must be answered is: How would you prove that the phone is yours? To get around this problem, future phones or electronic ID may require some form of biometric security function including photo, fingerprint and photo retinal scan comparisons. Of course, there is still a ways to go. If consumers, airlines, airports and the TSA don't embrace the NFC kiosks, experts say it's unlikely Apple's vision would become reality. 'First you would have to sell industry on Apple's idea. Then you'd have to sell it to travel consumers,' says Neil Hughes of Apple Insider. 'It's a chicken-and-egg problem.'"

232 comments

  1. A 1984 device ? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The irony is that the "1984" theme became one of the most successful ad campaign for Apple back then ...

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:A 1984 device ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      how about they just fuck the TSA right off, and everyone can go back to being chilled and not freaking out about being on a plane. TSA has stopped 0 terrorists, but has sexually assulted millions.

    2. Re:A 1984 device ? by jazman_777 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I guess we all just assumed that the hammer-throwing chick represented Apple.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    3. Re:A 1984 device ? by aurispector · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Cell phones are becoming less about communications and more about tracking and identification. Pretty soon big brother isn't going to let you leave home without it.

      1984 was a warning, not an instruction manual.

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    4. Re:A 1984 device ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh for fuck's sake. When you buy an airline ticket your entire life history is available for the taking. You are not traveling anonymously or privately. You are known to the TSA before you ever step into the airline terminal. If you want to blame someone, start with DHS and the TSA. Apple isn't selling you out, your government sold you out.

    5. Re:A 1984 device ? by Mitreya · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Cell phones are becoming less about communications and more about tracking and identification.

      It's a good thing that not every phone is an iPhone then, huh.
      If their patent works out, they are sure to make this iTravel thing a permanent and non-removable staple of iPhone 6S or whatever it'll be by then.

    6. Re:A 1984 device ? by EricThribb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Apple always makes me think of George Orwell - just that it's Animal Farm rather than 1984 that springs to mind

    7. Re:A 1984 device ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't know if I mind if millions of terrorist get sexually assualted.

    8. Re:A 1984 device ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you want to blame someone, start with DHS and the TSA. Apple isn't selling you out, your government sold you out.

      Close but you're one level too shallow which is .. typical. DHS and TSA are effects. Not causes.

      The causes are a bunch of Americans who think being fat and stupid is acceptable. They care a LOT more about who the next American Idol will be, or which football team wins a game (athletes == the really rich people nobody hates) than they do about our progress along a path to our own brand of fascism. Ever see mindless football fans jumping up and down, yelling and screaming etc. over a touchdown? If they got half that concerned and excited about freedom (real freedom, not the "freedom to tell other people how to live" bullshit) we wouldn't HAVE a TSA.

      Fat stupid people who aren't terribly aware of what's going on is an environment. Government tyranny is an organism that thrives in this particular environment. It is not hard to understand. It's just hard for immature minds to accept because there is no nice fluffy-bunny way to say it that will never offend anybody. And to immature minds, being inoffensive no matter how low of a priority that should be in the face of bigger problems, is much more important than dealing with reality.

    9. Re:A 1984 device ? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Funny

      The TSA is actually a wonderful institution that has brought cheap healthcare to thousands in America.

      Now if I take a fall and am afraid I broke something rather than go to the ER and get an X-Ray ($500). Pay the hospital for their time ($500) and then pay the Doctor. ($1000) I just buy the cheapest plane ticket ($200) I can find and go through security with change in my pockets. Enough times that I can get a few good views of the problem.

    10. Re:A 1984 device ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1984 was a warning, not an instruction manual.

      And Apple used it to try to scare people away from flexible PCs to Macs, fast-forward to now and aside from colour there's not much differentiating iPhones, everyone has the same.

    11. Re:A 1984 device ? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't you be going on your "fat people" rant in the BPA thread?

    12. Re:A 1984 device ? by DragonTHC · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's not irony.

      Who will a stolen iPhone identify?

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
    13. Re:A 1984 device ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't you be out jogging instead of being offended by the computer you sit in front of 18 hours a day?

    14. Re:A 1984 device ? by Smauler · · Score: 0

      Do you live in the real world? Honestly, have you met any of these fat people who care more about American Idol & random sport than their paycheck?

      I really don't know where you're coming from with the sports angle - Sports have been interconnected with political movements since their inception. Those most fanatical about their sports are often most fanatical politically.

      Fat stupid people aren't sports fans, generally.

    15. Re:A 1984 device ? by Patent+Lover · · Score: 3, Insightful

      how about they just fuck the TSA right off, and everyone can go back to being chilled and not freaking out about being on a plane. TSA has stopped 0 terrorists, but has sexually assulted millions.

      If only I had mod points. Can we bury this fucking national embarrassment and waste of our tax money already.

    16. Re:A 1984 device ? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Nope, I'm at work (and below average weight). I'm not offended as an object of the post, but as a human being seeing the offensive classism and prejudice.

    17. Re:A 1984 device ? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Cell phones are becoming less about communications and more about tracking and identification. Pretty soon big brother isn't going to let you leave home without it.

      1984 was a warning, not an instruction manual.

      I travel a fair bit for work. Not nearly as much as I used to as I've been trying to travel less. I'm probably a little older than the average /. reader too. But every now an then I end up at the airport and am not in a totally self absorbed rush and it really scares the shit out of me what we have allowed our government to take away from us.

      Air travel has truly made me think that many of the nightmarish versions of the future that were envisioned decades ago are, at least in part, coming true. Anywhere you stand in an airport you hear a repeated announcement every two minutes. Basically an authoritative voice telling you what you can carry on the plane. Or that your bag will be taken and destroyed if you leave it unattended. Or not to trust anyone and report suspicious behavior. It's a far cry from the first time I flew when you were more likely to hear jingles about flying the friendly skies

      Now you get herded through scanners and treated like a criminal. Particularly if you forgot that bottle of water in your carry-on. And the way I have seen people treated who choose to not go through the (non-monitored by sane practices) radiation emitting scanners is terrifying. On multiple occasions I've seen several TSA employees loudly make fun of these people. It's a far cry from the days when you were treated like a valued customer and respected as a person by the people at the airport.

      When I stop to take the time to actually watch and listen to what is happening at airport today; and try to remember my mindset of how things once were I find it's a shame how our way of life has been altered by those in power. I don't know if the cause was Bin Laden and his cowardly attacks on this country. Or if our leaders chose to use it as an excuse to do this themselves. Either way, it saddens me to think that we have lost our way.

    18. Re:A 1984 device ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      you become what you hate.

      1984.

    19. Re:A 1984 device ? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      Just remember that it's all perfectly halal so long as it's for jihad.

    20. Re:A 1984 device ? by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 1

      I think they were inspired by the "It just works" campaign, and thought just having an iDevice on hand will make security "just work".

      --
      Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
    21. Re:A 1984 device ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't blame the people. People are not stupid. They just aren't you.

      Were you asleep during the past two years? Do you not remember Occupy (anniversary of the first OWS was earlier in the week). Heck, do you even remember 2010 and Taxed Enough Already? People care about their rights and show it and have ideas for solutions for our problems (economy,freedoms, etc), they just might not see eye-to-eye on what you think is so obvious or important.

      I'm aware you're probably just complaining, but your "government tyranny" is just a government that you don't agree with. The government that doesn't interfere with their touchdowns and their fat is what they want so they grasp it. If you plan on taking that away from them, you become the tryant of a new kind, who shoves your version of freedom down their throats because you know what's right and what's good for them.

      Now I want people to be intelligent and delliberant too, but blaming them is intellectually lacking. Remember this is a democracy, for better or for worse. You, the individual, don't dictate the rest of society and set their laws. The correct choice of action if you want to combat this "fat and stupid" disease is to spread your view, your intelligence. Tell people your views and see if they agree with them; may be they would agree with you, and may be they haven't seen the perspective you have. Don't write off people as idiots just because "they don't get it."

      I feel that I must say this because resentment and blame of a specific group is the beginning of some of the most despicable civic conflicts throughout history and generalizations like the ones you mention fuel these (Nazi's blaming the Jews, for example).

      Finally, I hate the TSA and the encroachment on my personal freedom as you do.

    22. Re:A 1984 device ? by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      you become what you hate.

      1984.

      So Slashdot will become Apple?

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    23. Re:A 1984 device ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      1984 was a warning, not an instruction manual.

      That depends on your point of view.

      And in response to the article, no it's not a "chicken and egg" problem. You can sell Apple users any shiny piece of shit you find laying around as long as it has the iPoop logo on it. They'll even trample each other at the local store to get one, even though their existing iDevice works just fine and the new one offers them nothing substantial to justify the purchase.

    24. Re:A 1984 device ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if the cause was Bin Laden and his cowardly attacks on this country.

      - Going undercover into enemy territory for a long time
      - Defying enemy security while not standing out from the crowd
      - with only a handful of people, overpowering airplane staff and keeping a horde of the enemy cowed into submission

      I'm not sure what you think is so blatantly cowardly about it.

      (ps for the morons: yes I despise those attacks.)

    25. Re:A 1984 device ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Lemme guess, calling Bin Laden a coward is one of your pet peeves. Way to totally miss the point. You're a gotcha queen. Fuck off.

    26. Re:A 1984 device ? by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...or you could move to a country with a healthcare service ....rather than a system run for the benefit of insurance companies

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    27. Re:A 1984 device ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why I Won't Be Buying An iPhone 5

      "Apple still hasn't improved the way that I can interact with their phone. It's just the same thing, again . . . Apple hasn't addressed the one thing that's always bothered me about iOS. The iPhone just isn't personal. It doesn't know me and allow me to adjust it to make it my personal phone. I don't think they understand that their end users aren't a big faceless group of people."

      Owen Williams

    28. Re:A 1984 device ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No we can't bury them. The TSA exists to get you used to the police state the Homeland Security will be rolling out to all Constitution free Zones soon (within 100 miles of water or airport? You have no rights). You don't like it? GTFO. I with I could... I've made too many such comments and am now on a no-fly list.

    29. Re:A 1984 device ? by dargaud · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Anywhere you stand in an airport you hear a repeated announcement every two minutes. Basically an authoritative voice telling you [...]

      When I saw Strange Days in 1995, with its constant authoritative announcements in the background, I thought it was bad science fiction. Then it happened.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    30. Re:A 1984 device ? by stiggle · · Score: 1

      Wheras their manufacturing conditions and end users are explored in "The Road to Wigan Pier."

    31. Re:A 1984 device ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the planes were gassed to knock everyone out, then the planes were taken over via Sat Coms Remote Control, NSA.

      And what did the StarWars program pay for?

    32. Re:A 1984 device ? by aurispector · · Score: 0

      ...and lose the one real advantage the US system has: competition. That's the one factor obamacare completely ignored and the one thing that could have actually increased efficiency and lowered costs.

      Yet despite the fact that basically every big government social program is bankrupt, liberals continue to insist that we pour ever more money into them. The definition of insanity is when you repeat the same actions expecting different results.

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    33. Re:A 1984 device ? by somersault · · Score: 2

      There's still private healthcare here in the UK. The difference is that you aren't forced to use it.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    34. Re:A 1984 device ? by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Does not compute.

      1. Did we have competition before Obamacare? If so, why was healthcare so expensive compared to the rest of the world. If not, how did "Obamacare" miss this?

      2. Competition between what and what exactly? Insurance companies? Still exists. Hospitals and doctors and stuff? That still exists too. (Before chipping in with the regular "But insurance means I get to pick the most expensive... blah blah", no it doesn't, because your insurer doesn't offer you all the doctors at the same prices. That's why you have to pick a doctor out of a catalog when you pick a new insurer, and why your insurance has different rates for "in-network" and "out of network" doctors. Likewise every insurance plan I've seen has at least three different rates for drugs.)

      3. Regardless of whether competition "existed" before Obamacare or not, competition between different healthcare entities within their fields is obviously higher in the US than it is in countries like the UK, where private entities have to compete with "free" and thus have to target relatively small markets. Again, why does the US spend a much higher proportion per-capita on healthcare, and why does it fail to cover such a substantial proportion of the population despite spending being so many times more?

      I'm not defending Obamacare here, but I am attacking the idea that "competition" is the issue. It isn't. The situation hasn't changed pre- or post- Obamacare, largely because Obamacare really didn't change much, which is the major reason it's a piece of shit. Healthcare is expensive in the US because it's inefficient. It's inefficient largely because of competition, not despite it. It's inefficient in part because it's biased towards the needs of the relatively well off rather than aimed at providing a basic, necessary, standard of care for everyone. The most efficient, best bang per buck, parts of the healthcare system in the US today are Medicare (minus Medicare Plus and Part B, for obvious reasons), and the VA Hospital system. There's a reason for that.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    35. Re:A 1984 device ? by beelsebob · · Score: 2

      ...and lose the one real advantage the US system has: competition. That's the one factor obamacare completely ignored and the one thing that could have actually increased efficiency and lowered costs.

      And yet, the US, competitive system of giving health care has given you some of the highest medical costs in the world. No amount of saying "this works" will make it any more so – you tried it, it doesn't work as well as the other experiments being performed in other countries. The scientific method says... Socialised health care is more efficient than Capitalised.

    36. Re:A 1984 device ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot will have a hard time accepting that it was Melinda Gates.

    37. Re:A 1984 device ? by pantaril · · Score: 1

      Fat stupid people who aren't terribly aware of what's going on is an environment. Government tyranny is an organism that thrives in this particular environment

      I agree with your post mostly but i think you are forgetting about slim stupid people.

    38. Re:A 1984 device ? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know if the cause was Bin Laden and his cowardly attacks on this country.

      - Going undercover into enemy territory for a long time

      Yes, this is very difficult in the US where diversity is the norm. I mean, holy shit, they had to keep from firing guns in the air or leave the RPG at home to blend in. That's fucking amazing!

      - Defying enemy security while not standing out from the crowd

      What security? This was pre-9-11. Walking up to the airplane w/o shooting anyone? Damn that must have been difficult.

      - with only a handful of people, overpowering airplane staff and keeping a horde of the enemy cowed into submission

      Only because prior to that day, no one was bat shit crazy enough to hijack a plane and do what they did. If someone robs a bank, they generally don't shoot everybody when they leave. Or blow themselves and everybody up after getting the cash. That didn't work out so well on the fourth plane, did it? And pre 9-11 do you really find overpowering the staff of an airplane manly? A group of mostly women and somehow they managed to overpower them. They must have been Chuck Norris like to be able to do that.

      I'm not sure what you think is so blatantly cowardly about it.

      Because the little pussy did not do it himself. He convinced other fools to do it for him and then hid like a little bitch.

    39. Re:A 1984 device ? by kilfarsnar · · Score: 2

      ...and lose the one real advantage the US system has: competition. That's the one factor obamacare completely ignored and the one thing that could have actually increased efficiency and lowered costs.

      How does competition work in healthcare to bring down cost? Do I shop around for the lowest cost doctor (Hi, everybody!)? Or do I decide whether a doctor's recommended test is too expensive and not necessary? How do I, as a non-doctor, decide what my medical needs are and how they should be priced?

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    40. Re:A 1984 device ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anywhere you stand in an airport you hear a repeated announcement every two minutes. Basically an authoritative voice telling you [...]

      When I saw Strange Days in 1995, with its constant authoritative announcements in the background, I thought it was bad science fiction. Then it happened.

      Strange days indeed! Most peculiar, mama.

    41. Re:A 1984 device ? by kilfarsnar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you want to blame someone, start with DHS and the TSA. Apple isn't selling you out, your government sold you out.

      Close but you're one level too shallow which is .. typical. DHS and TSA are effects. Not causes. The causes are a bunch of Americans who think being fat and stupid is acceptable. They care a LOT more about who the next American Idol will be, or which football team wins a game (athletes == the really rich people nobody hates) than they do about our progress along a path to our own brand of fascism. Ever see mindless football fans jumping up and down, yelling and screaming etc. over a touchdown? If they got half that concerned and excited about freedom (real freedom, not the "freedom to tell other people how to live" bullshit) we wouldn't HAVE a TSA. Fat stupid people who aren't terribly aware of what's going on is an environment. Government tyranny is an organism that thrives in this particular environment. It is not hard to understand. It's just hard for immature minds to accept because there is no nice fluffy-bunny way to say it that will never offend anybody. And to immature minds, being inoffensive no matter how low of a priority that should be in the face of bigger problems, is much more important than dealing with reality.

      While I agree with you overall assessment of the attention level of the American people, I would point out that they are lied to and manipulated by the media and Corporate America, and whomever the CIA has working at ABC, CBS and NBC these days. People are conditioned to think America is just the definition of awesomeness. And awesome doesn't promote fascism. So a lot of them will not come to the conclusion on their own that Uncle Sam is slowly straight-jacketing them.

      Some of us are naturally suspicious and skeptical of authority. I'm guessing you fall into that category. I know I do. From the moment I heard the US referred to as the "Homeland" I knew something was up. That is a very loaded word that was never used to describe our country before 9/11. But most people are too busy getting through their daily lives to pay attention to higher concepts like control of a population though fear, distraction and subtle intimidation. One can't think about that stuff when he is worried about how to make the rent this month.

      The elite who rule this country understand that people can't really consider their position if they are scrambling for basic needs. A lot of people, when under stress, will look for escape. It is provided in the forms of vapid TV, infotainent "news", and shallow consumerism. The rulers have always understood the value of bread and circuses; today is no different. So I agree that the people of this country need to wake up and smell the authoritarianism. But I also know that there are forces arrayed against them that many are not equipped to resist.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    42. Re:A 1984 device ? by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      you become what you hate.

      1984.

      So Slashdot will become Apple?

      No, Van Halen.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    43. Re:A 1984 device ? by yenot · · Score: 1

      why was healthcare so expensive compared to the rest of the world.

      In order for *price* competition to work in a free market, the party paying for the service needs to be the same as the party receiving the service. In order to restore price competition, health benefits provided by employers need to be taxed as regular income. In the US, we've created a demand side subsidy that distances consumers from payment (a double whammy for increasing prices). The tax subsidies go much deeper than people realize, as health benefits are free from payroll taxes as well as income taxes. The current system is regressive (subsidizes the rich more), as wealthy people have better insurance and spend more on health care. Health benefits are income. If they were taxed as such, most people would choose catastrophic (high-deductible) plans, and routine medical care would deliver much more value per dollar spent.

    44. Re:A 1984 device ? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      It worked just fine for me before Obamacare.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    45. Re:A 1984 device ? by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      For given values of "it worked just fine" – it cost about 4 times more than the socialised health care that works just fine in the civilised world ;)

    46. Re:A 1984 device ? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      For given values of "it worked just fine" â" it cost about 4 times more than the socialised health care that works just fine in the civilised world ;)

      One thing that allows this in much of the other world...is the amount of $$$ the US spends on our military strung out at bases throughout the world, usually there to protect other countries. The EU comes largely to mind.

      I wish we'd pull out over there..save our own money, and see how much you have left for your 'everyone gets it' healthcare system when YOU have to start paying for your own military defense.

      The US is pretty much enabling you to do all this currently.....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    47. Re:A 1984 device ? by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      Uhhhh, you realise those air bases they have in the UK are provided free to the US by the UK government? This was given free after the second world war. Honestly, if you thought that 6 military bases in the UK somehow magically came even close to the tax/NI revenue the UK generates you've actually got to be mad.

      The reason the UK can afford socialised health care is simple – because socialised health care is cheaper than capitalised health care.

    48. Re:A 1984 device ? by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      Competition in Republican-speak means a race to the bottom between states to see who can provide the least coverage. It might help your employer find a cheaper policy, but it's not gonna save you a penny. Those cheap plans don't cover as much, so the rest comes from you.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    49. Re:A 1984 device ? by mhajicek · · Score: 1

      I hate to say it, but I think you and people like you are a big part of the problem. If you see the problem and decide to put up with it anyway, you're giving them permission to continue. The only way to stop this is if enough people refuse to submit. I understand this would be hard, and that you would have to find a different job. I turned down an otherwise promising job offer because it would involve air travel, and I absolutely refuse to submit to TSA.

    50. Re:A 1984 device ? by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      I don't know if I mind if millions of terrorist get sexually assualted.

      I think you would mind if it was your wife or daughter or mother. TFA is a bureaucracy out of control, surviving on fear.

      Pilots cabins are sealed now, and to board a plane with something that can penetrate that security door would take a small cannon. The cannon would have to be hidden in a backpack the size of a breadbox.

      Yes, the better way is to do tit or tat. If one of our planes is attacked, just do it to one of theirs. Sorry, it may not even have to be done, if the counter threat was publicised.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    51. Re:A 1984 device ? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Uhhhh, you realise those air bases they have in the UK are provided free to the US by the UK government? This was given free after the second world war. Honestly, if you thought that 6 military bases in the UK somehow magically came even close to the tax/NI revenue the UK generates you've actually got to be mad.

      I wasn't talking about the rent on the property...but, rather the expense the US has keeping our servicemen there...and all the hardware there, and maintenance on all of it.....

      You also have socialized health care by taxing the shit out of everything to pay for it...if we pulled out, you'd have to spend more of that money on your own defense...I'd think this would be a pretty hefty nickle or two for all countries housing US forces if we took out the defense, not to mention all the money that those bases generate in those areas (tax monies, etc...that the forces spend locally, etc).

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    52. Re:A 1984 device ? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      It worked just fine for me before Obamacare.

      Ahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Oh, wait, you were serious, let me laugh even harder.

      It still isn't quite there post-obamacare, but it's a start.

      What you had pre-obamacare could never, ever, ever be described as "work[ing] just fine".

    53. Re:A 1984 device ? by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      I wasn't talking about the rent on the property...but, rather the expense the US has keeping our servicemen there...and all the hardware there, and maintenance on all of it.....

      Okay, so you have US people, on US soil (in the middle of the UK) getting paid by the US, using the US millitary health systems, and paying US taxes... How does this have any relevance to the UK's ability to pay for socialised health care?

      You also have socialized health care by taxing the shit out of everything to pay for it...

      Right, but the increase in tax to pay for socialised health care is 1/4 of the cost of people paying for health insurance, that's what cheaper means – it costs less >.if we pulled out, you'd have to spend more of that money on your own defense...

      Actually, the UK spends more (as a proportion of it's GDP) on defence than the average country, even the average western country. Believe it or not, the US is not the saviour of the world. In fact, if the US pulled out, and didn't involve us in so many random wars with no purpose we arguable would pay significantly less tax.

      I'd think this would be a pretty hefty nickle or two for all countries housing US forces if we took out the defense

      You realise there are a total of 6 USAF squadrons in the UK, as compared with hundreds of RAF squadrons, right?

      not to mention all the money that those bases generate in those areas (tax monies, etc...that the forces spend locally, etc).

      Right, a total of 600 odd people makes an enormous difference to a country of 70 million people, it increases the tax take massively, especially when those 600 people mostly spend their money on base...

    54. Re:A 1984 device ? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      The UK spends approximately 8% of it's GDP per capita on healthcare. The US is double that, despite the supposedly "superior" system.

      Trying to claim that you are subsidising the entire world's healthcare due to being the "world police" (America, Fuck Yeah!) is the most hilariously stupid thing I have ever heard.

      You think the UK is protected from whatever it is you think the US military supposedly protects it from? Terrorism I guess? This is not our first go around the block with terrorism, both domestic and international. Nice to see the US military "protecting" us so effectively from the IRA in the 70s, 80s and 90s, or from the terrorist bombs in London on 7/7. Mmmm. Real good job you did there.

      Man, you're funny. The presence of US bases in the UK does not appreciably change the cost of our national defence because the US military *does not do that anyway*. The fact that you think the presence of a few token bomber bases and locations for eavesdropping equipment acts as some sort of deterrent that allows us to skimp on defence spending... well... I have a bridge to sell you.

    55. Re:A 1984 device ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More importantly, I'm sure its not hard to jailbreak the thing and then replace the image file of the stolen identity with one of yourself.

    56. Re:A 1984 device ? by yenot · · Score: 1

      You missed the point. Health insurance is tied to your employer in the United States because of the harmful tax code that subsidizes health insurance. Most people would not choose employer provided health plans if health-insurance income was taxed as regular income on the full dollar value. Insurance is for catastrophic things, not regular doctor visits. Your insurance company could require you to visit a dentist once a year, but it *shouldn't* be paying for it. Once individuals are paying for for non-catastrophic health care in large numbers (i.e. people have the incentive to shop around and question the validity of unnecessary procedures), costs will come down.

    57. Re:A 1984 device ? by Patent+Lover · · Score: 1

      I'm with ya brother.

  2. Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by swschrad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    which hasn't happened yet.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by Severus+Snape · · Score: 5, Funny

      iPhone 6, duh. Apple's phones are pretty predictable these days, new tech comes a cycle late.

    2. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      You could do it without NFC. You could use WiFi or Bluetooth or many other technologies. Personally I think it would work even better without any of those.

      The PreCheck system in airports just relies on uploading your photo ID. In fact that seems like the easiest and most secure system all around. But it would require all of the states opening up their ID photos to one database. Then when you walk up to the airport. The facial recognition could confirm that you're on the list of airline tickets registered for the day.

      It would be 100x more reliable than the current system where you print off a ticket that looks authentic and hand them a driver's license which can be easily forged.

    3. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by pnot · · Score: 3, Interesting

      iPhone 6, duh. Apple's phones are pretty predictable these days, new tech comes a cycle late.

      The first phone with NFC was the Nokia 6131, which came out a year before the first iPhone. So maybe new tech comes six cycles late...

    4. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by Severus+Snape · · Score: 1

      Nice fact but you know what I mean, NFC is now a expected feature for the top of the range smart phones but Apple have done LTE this cycle, NFC next cycle.

    5. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by icebike · · Score: 1

      No, you can't do it with wifi or bluetooth. The range is too great, and its too easy to hack.

      Actually you can't do any of this stuff at all, because as soon as TSA authorizes any of this stuff, the other
      phone makers are going to be in court demanding no special favors to one company.

      Its a useless patent, because government wouldn't dare try to implement it.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    6. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by pnot · · Score: 1

      Well yes, I was half-joking. But I feel as though they're more like two cycles behind on this -- 2011 was when NFC really hit the mainstream, there was a fair bit of speculation that the 4S would have it.

    7. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by BasilBrush · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nice fact but you know what I mean, NFC is now a expected feature for the top of the range smart phones

      Why? I've never seen a place where you can use it. Similar schemes for cards/devices to replace small change etc. have failed to find any traction many times before.

      As it stands for those phones that have it, at best it's a pointless novelty.

      If Apple introduce it it'll be when and if it gains traction, or if before that, it'll be when Apple themselves can put together enough partners to make it worthwhile.

    8. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by alostpacket · · Score: 1

      New? They just haven't invented it yet.

      --
      PocketPermissions Android Permission Guide
    9. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by EGSonikku · · Score: 2, Informative

      As opposed to non-hackable NFC?

      "Summary: Using a pair of zero day vulnerabilities, a team of security researchers from U.K.-based MWR Labs hacked into a Samsung Galaxy S3 phone running Android 4.0.4 by beaming an exploit via NFC"

      http://www.zdnet.com/exploit-beamed-via-nfc-to-hack-samsung-galaxy-s3-android-4-0-4-7000004510/

      --
      - "Scientia non habet inimicum nisp ignorantem"
    10. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by icebike · · Score: 4, Informative

      They were 1 centimeter away from the back side of the phone.

      Don't you think someone would notice that? The exploit was not NFC specific, and BOTH sender and receiver had to be manipulated to authorizet the transmission. Way to troll.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    11. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by djdanlib · · Score: 1

      You could have it in a bag and run into someone at the store, library, subway, airport... heck, even out on the street. When was the last time you thought twice about someone bumping into you accidentally?

    12. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      Yes you have seen it, just not on your phone its on you credit/debit card. Only its called paypass or blink but the technology is the same.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    13. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 0

      have you never bumped into someone or been bumped into in a crowd, or a rave, or a moshpit, or in busy airport, or any of a million other place where people come in close contact with each other. people have been pick-pocketed for millennium without noticing they were having things taken out of their pockets. now they don't even have to touch you.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    14. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by afidel · · Score: 1

      Hehe, a similar tech is already in the passport, most western passports now include RFID chips. Now we just need Congress to withhold highway funds until the states include RFID in drivers licenses and we're at the same end goal without needing an expensive smartphone with a charged battery available.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    15. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 0

      So? Multitouch was being worked on in the 70s-80s. Didn't stop Jobs from claiming to have invented it when the first iPhone shipped. When they put this in the iPhone 5s they will claim it's this amazing new thing that they invented.

    16. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why? I've never seen a place where you can use it.

      That is because you are an American. The rest of the world is far ahead on this.

    17. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by icebike · · Score: 3, Informative

      Every time I'm bumped and the guy asks me to open my phone and tap OK, it sticks in my mind.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    18. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by icebike · · Score: 2

      Dude ; Read.

      NFC requires that you have the phone awake, and that you tap the screen to confirm the transfer.

      If they pick your pocket they aren't going to use NFC.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    19. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't if it's been hacked or exploited.

    20. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by djdanlib · · Score: 1

      Hmm, is that the default setting for it? If so, then never mind, that would be unlikely to happen.

      If it becomes ubiquitous I'm sure it'll be like ActiveX warnings eventually... people will be trained to just click the button to make the message go away when it appears.

    21. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      GPs point was that whenever you see a terminal with PayPass marking, you can use an NFC-enabled phone to pay there. At least this is the case with Google Wallet on Android.

    22. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      No, it's because he's clueless. There are numerous PayPass terminals throughout the US. My local supermarket has that, for example. Even many fast food joints have it, esp. on drive-through.

    23. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by phayes · · Score: 1

      NFC Is not an "expected" feature. It is a feature hoped for by those pushing this unwanted immature technology. The rest of us do not want NFC in our phones.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    24. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by stiggle · · Score: 1

      Thats because Jobs added "on a mobile device" to the patent application :-)

    25. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      Version 2 will be a plastic RFID covered chip containing 1Mb of personal info/photos/dna/history, 5mm wide, and will slip under the skin for perm usage. It will be on the right hand also.

      The mark is coming.

      Planet Earth Prison Complex #715 complete with 7 billion employees. For sale to any aliens.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    26. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      And yet, NFC was predicted in the 3GS, the 4, the 4S and the 5... Still hasn't shown up. All the rumor mongers do is repeat the same tripe until a small section happens to be true, and then go "look look, we were right". It's not hard to be right when your prediction is "the phone will have a faster CPU" (hence why they were right about that), but it is hard to be right when your prediction is "the phone will have a short range communication tech that no one's really thought of a good use for yet".

    27. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      Hit the main stream? I'm not aware of a single "mainstream" individual who even knows what NFC is. I'm aware of plenty of geeks who know what it is, but not yet one who's actually found a use for it. And no "oh oh oh, I can use it to pay for my starbucks" doesn't count – because it isn't actually solving a problem... I could already pay for my starbucks with items (credit card or cash) that I still have to carry about with me due to NFC payments being only possible for very small amounts.

    28. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      No, I have never seen anything called paypass or blink. I'm not saying it doesn't exist. I mean it's possible that it's built into some payment terminals, but I haven't ever seen it being offered as an option.

      If it's not being marketed so that consumers are aware of it, then its pointless. Maybe it's marketed more where you live than where I do.

    29. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      And my earlier point is that I've never seen such a terminal out in the wild. It probably depends where one lives.

    30. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      Seriously? Every time someone bumps into me I check my pockets and bags to make sure nothing's missing or unusual. Maybe I'm paranoid but I've seen enough pickpockets and traveled in enough places where they frequent that it just makes good sense.

      Not to mention, as someone else said, it still takes manipulation on both sides of the transaction to make the exploit work.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    31. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      Seriously? Every time someone bumps into me I check my pockets and bags to make sure nothing's missing or unusual.

      I got into that habit living in Las Vegas for a few years. Wallet goes in the front pocket, any "accidental" bump or jostle prompts a pocket check (even, or perhaps especially if it's a little kid because scumbags can use them as distractions).

    32. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You've never seen a terminal with this logo (usually combined with the normal slot to swipe your card)? I find it extremely surprising. There are loads pretty much everywhere on the West Coast.

    33. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      weird my local bank has made it default on all debit cards and i have seen it on credit cards and all of the card reader in my area have it and now many of the vending machines have it even. unfortunately the vending machines at my collage can't uses it due to the IT refusing to allow them have a network connection the card readers are useless. and i usually don't get a lunch break between classes so it is particularly annoying.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    34. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      It really depends where you live. I live in NW PA and you simply won't see 'paypass' anywhere here. Even in a city with over 150,000 people here you simply won't see them. I can however drive south to Pittsburgh, East to Buffalo, or west to Cleveland and find some in the better neighborhoods. The poorer areas don't have them either even int these larger places.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    35. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      No, never. I live in the UK.

    36. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      What is there to hack? It just needs to transmit your name. If people want to know my name they don't have to hack my phone to figure it out. They just have to say "Hi I'm, _______".

      The interesting information is all at the security console.

    37. Re:Also, Apple would need NFC in their phones by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      No, it's because he's clueless. There are numerous PayPass terminals throughout the US.

      Both of you are wrong and presumptuous. I live in the UK.

  3. fanboys by masternerdguy · · Score: 0, Troll

    keep buying apple

    --
    To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
  4. I am glad NFC is available on iPhones by thammoud · · Score: 1

    Apple's patent calls for the placement of special kiosks (PDF) around the airport which will automatically exchange data with your phone via a close range wireless technology called near field communication (NFC).

    1. Re:I am glad NFC is available on iPhones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  5. shrug. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    well, patenting it is a good way to ensure it won't happen for 20 years. Patents retard innovation, as is well understood by now.

    1. Re:shrug. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, patenting it is a good way to ensure it won't happen for 20 years. Patents retard innovation, as is well understood by now.

      Umm, no. That's NOT what that says:

      We show through theory and example that intellectual monopoly is not necessary for innovation and as a practical matter is damaging to growth, prosperity and liberty.

      Where's the "retard innovation" there?

      Even if you accept the authors' claims, they're not claiming patents retard innovation. So how the hell can you claim that's "well understood" when your documentation doesn't even say that?

    2. Re:shrug. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Its not the same...

      Patents retard innovation
      Retards patent innovation
      Retards patent retard innovations
      Patent retards retard innovation

  6. Companies: Apple isn't forever by Kittenman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've attended a couple of Tech conferences where the presenters seem to assume that
    - everyone is, or will be on Facebook
    - everyone has, or will have an Apple device (iphone or ipad)

    All rather short-sighted. In the past we've seen new ideas come along and be embraced by society and then abandoned. Skateboard parks, CB radios, kung fu ...

    Not to say that Apple doesn't have a large customer base now - but it won't always. Is it really that worthwhile to introduce special handling for people with a special type of device?

    --
    "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:Companies: Apple isn't forever by 0123456 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Clearly once this technology was introduced, owning an iPhone would become compulsory for travellers who didn't want to be butt probed.

    2. Re:Companies: Apple isn't forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple has out lasted,

      Alliant Computer Systems, Altos Computer Systems, Amdahl Corporation, Amiga, Apollo Computer, Apricot Computers, Ardent Computer, AST Computers, Austin, Computer Systems, Burroughs, Be, Celerity Computing, Commodore International, Compaq, CompuAdd, Computer Automation, Control Data Corporation (CDC), Convex Computer, Corona Data Systems, Cromemco, Data General, Digital Equipment Corporation, e-WIS computers, Eagle Computer, Encore Computer, English Electric, Everex, Evesham, Fountain Technologies, International Computers and Tabulators (ICT), International Computers Limited (ICL), Kaypro, Leading Edge, Liebermann Computers, Luxor AB, Magnuson Computer Systems, Maxdata, Mitsubishi Electronics, MPC, Multiflow Computer, Nixdorf Computer, Northgate Computer Systems, Osborne Computer, Packard Bell, PC Brand, Printaform, Processor Technology, Psystar, Pyramid Technology, Radio Shack, RCA, Remington Rand, Scientific Data Systems, Sequent Computer Systems, SGI, Simply Computers, Sinclair Research, Solbourne Computer, Sperry, Sperry Rand, Stardent, Stellar Computer, Sun Microsystems, Systems Engineering Laboratories, Tandy Corporation, Tiny Computers, Wang Laboratories, XByte Computers, Zeos, Zepto Computers, Amstrad, Data General, Tulip Computers, Gladius Computer, Domtech multimedia communication ltd, Egenera, Vigor Gaming (USA), e-WIS Computers, VoodooPC

      In short Apple isn't going anywhere any time soon. But I will tell some compaines that will either be out of business or no longer selling android phones in 5 years.
      LG, HTC, Motorola, Blackberry, Nokia, ZTC, Sony Ericsson, etc...

    3. Re:Companies: Apple isn't forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming everyone is on Facebook is not a bad assumption.

      Assumption is bad, but that assumption is one of the worst.

    4. Re:Companies: Apple isn't forever by trout007 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It depends. Consumers had abandoned General Motors and drove them into bankruptcy. But luckily for them they own enough politicians so they just stole $50 Billion from Bond holders and another $50 Billion from the same people that won't buy their cars and BOOM back in business making cars nobody wants.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    5. Re:Companies: Apple isn't forever by OhANameWhatName · · Score: 1

      Not to say that Apple doesn't have a large customer base now - but it won't always

      But between time period A and time period B, the customer base is getting larger, not smaller.

    6. Re:Companies: Apple isn't forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've noticed that trend as well. It is like you are talking to a newly converted religious zealot that fails to grasp the notion that many people do not use Facebook nor Apple. Google was started in a garage by a couple of maths grads that build a search engine and Facebook by some students that has a simplistic idea. The notion that these companies are the final evolution in terms of how we use the Internet is laughable - we have only scratched the surface. The evolution will continue and new business models will emerge.

    7. Re:Companies: Apple isn't forever by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Clearly once this technology was introduced, owning an iPhone would become compulsory for travellers who didn't want to be butt probed.

      Actually, it prepares travelers to be probed. They already take it up the Jacksie from Apple, why not the TSA too.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    8. Re:Companies: Apple isn't forever by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      And if Microsoft hadn't bailed out Apple and committed to MS Office for OSX to beat the charges of monopolizing the market, Apple would have been on the list you just made. Apple with out one of the Steve's in command is doomed to to fall. Apple was at one time king of the personal computer then Microsoft began to sell DOS and NT to IBM and all of the PC clone manufacturers, which resulted in a situation very similar to the modern smart phone wars. by the way Apple tried pulling patent wars then to suing MS over the W.I.M.P. interface that they didn't invent much like they are currently suing over interfaces and other standard design elements now. Android for better of worse will probably be the next Windows in that it will be on everyones devices. Hopefully it Linux's influence and openness will stay with it keeping Google form being the next Microsoft.

      to quote battle star galactica

      "All this has happened before, and all this will happen again."
      or
      Apple's had held the consumer computing market before and they will loose it again

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    9. Re:Companies: Apple isn't forever by jbolden · · Score: 2

      Apple was not king for very long about 77-80. Commodore outsold them almost immediately with the Vic 20. The Vic 20 approached 1m units a year, and the Commodore-64 did 3x the volume the entire Apple ][ line ever did. IBM's PCDos based system were outselling Apple clones or no clones.

      You are conflating the late 70s with the early 80s too much. Things changed faster than, more like phones today.

    10. Re:Companies: Apple isn't forever by c0lo · · Score: 1

      I've attended a couple of Tech conferences where the presenters seem to assume that
      - everyone is, or will be on Facebook
      - everyone has, or will have an Apple device (iphone or ipad)

      All rather short-sighted.

      Short-sighted you say? Well, what more sort-sighted do you want when a big company (not related with the defense sector) assumes that TSA is forever or at least for long enough to construct a business case on its existence.

      The worst is not that Apple would be wrong... on the contrary, the worst is that it makes business sense already to capitalize on the "sheepness factor" of the consumers (can't even be called customers) which will accept the govt invasion on their rights without limits (at least, no temporal limits in sight).
      If they accept the govt, accepting Apple's control or letting themselves fleeced by Facebook is a piece of cake: with such a reaction, chances are Apple and Facebook will exist forever.

      (yeah... what do I expect? The 3 different pigs have won long ago - I suppose they are no longer just 3 - and we are zigzagging through boredom and pain looking for pigs on the wing).

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    11. Re:Companies: Apple isn't forever by kommakazi · · Score: 2

      I don't think Apple assumed everyone would have an iPhone in applying for this patent. they were simply positioning themselves to be the first to offer this type of service and roadblock the competition should it become viable.

  7. Chicken and egg problem by pokoteng · · Score: 2

    ... that shouldn't even be a problem in the first place. What's so wrong with passports again? They already have various other security (like RFID chips, iirc), and they're much more tightly controlled than phones you can buy off ebay.

    --
    the game
    1. Re:Chicken and egg problem by PPH · · Score: 2

      Having Apple handle my identity credentials is more like an alien and egg problem.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Chicken and egg problem by noobermin · · Score: 1

      F=q(E+vXB)

      Sorry, I couldn't help myself.

  8. Everything is temporary by MrEricSir · · Score: 2

    Not to say that Apple doesn't have a large customer base now - but it won't always. Is it really that worthwhile to introduce special handling for people with a special type of device?

    You mean for the security theater that didn't exist a decade years ago in a type of travel terminal that didn't exist a century ago? Stop kidding yourself: nothing lasts forever.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  9. USA government already ahead of industry on this by Scowler · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We have RFID tags in our passports already, so they are already moving us towards electronic IDs. It's a foregone conclusion that the type of ID done for international flights will eventually crop up in domestic travel as well, for better or worse.

    Consumers won't fight phone ID provided there is some added convenience that comes with it. Perhaps if we didn't have to remove shoes, for example (even though that security theatre seems unrelated to digital identification).

  10. Haven't they seen Touch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the first episode, the guy picks boxes and boxes of lost phones in the airport for his kid!

  11. Re:USA government already ahead of industry on thi by Tough+Love · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why should Apple allow the US government to own a monopoly on creepiness?

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  12. iTravel. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Because Microsoft already tried to trademark "Passport."

    1. Re:iTravel. by rwise2112 · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they would have trouble with iTravel2000?

      --

      "For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert"
  13. better late or never by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 1

    Time to move to a nice "backward" country, where this might be 10-20 years late or completely derailed by other considerations. This serves the system, not the consumer or citizen.

  14. Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Informative

    Apple submitted the patent in 2008, it was approved in July, and both Slashdot and CNN are talking about it today, so this is "secret" HOW?

    In all likelihood, it would be a service that would be available *IF YOU WANT IT*

    Christ, people, if you suffer from this type of PARANOIA regularly, seek professional help.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > In all likelihood, it would be a service that would be available *IF YOU WANT IT*
      Just like using SSN for anything but social security...oh wait...

    2. Re:Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by mounthood · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In all likelihood, it would be a service that would be available *IF YOU WANT IT*

      Christ, people, if you suffer from this type of PARANOIA regularly, seek professional help.

      Optional today, required tomorrow. But don't worry because it'll work with Android and Windows Phone 8, and you'll get to choose the software you like best!

      Swearing about PARANOIA seems more than a little unfair since the government has tried this strategy -- but without the iPhone -- before. It looks like they're currently calling it TSA PreCheck but they'll probably change it to "PhoneCheck".

      --
      tomorrow who's gonna fuss
    3. Re:Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said.

    4. Re:Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by Mitreya · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In all likelihood, it would be a service that would be available *IF YOU WANT IT*

      Indeed. To give a more recent example (than SSN given by someone else), consider the electronic toll-booths.

      First, it was a discount pilot program for those who want it

      Then it was a normal-price convenience

      Then the cash-booths dwindled to one or two per road

      And I have already ran into some booths in Illinois with "no human operator present". And ran into something like that in Canada (no cash payment option, apparently, but they can charge and fine you later with plate recognition)

      It doesn't even take that long to go from "optional convenience" to "optional if you like to suffer and pay extra"

    5. Re:Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      The Illinois system is free* to sign up

      *$10 refundable deposit/$40 prepaid tolls you do get the prepaid tolls back when you close your account.

      You do need to buy a cell phone + data plan to use it.

    6. Re:Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by OhANameWhatName · · Score: 3, Funny

      if you suffer from this type of PARANOIA regularly, seek professional help.

      Trust a psychiatrist? .. that's crazy talk!

    7. Re:Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about people driving across country? They wouldn't want to sign up for that.

    8. Re:Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Illinois system is free* to sign up

      Some people don't want to be in yet another tracking and easily accessible database. Other people like to easily determine how much they pay per passage and notice any price changes right away. It's not about the cost, it's about having the option of "thank you, not interested".

    9. Re:Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Just like using SSN for anything but social security...oh wait...

      I'm sorry, we're all required to carry Smart Phones now?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    10. Re:Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2

      Optional today, required tomorrow.

      Last time I checked, Smart Phones were not required by government decree.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    11. Re:Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      Christ, people, if you suffer from this type of PARANOIA regularly, seek professional help.

      I'll be sure to echo that back to you when you get an $800 speeding ticket you can't refute in court for whateverreasontheycanthinkof.

    12. Re:Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by jhobbs · · Score: 1

      Personal problem. You choose to live in a state where toll roads are a legal option for funds generation for the state highway department. We have four constitutional branches of government in Arkansas. Executive, Legislative, Judicial, and Transportation. Since they can't spend money they don't have (constitutional pay-as-you-go state) they only way to go into debt is to ask voters to approve a bond and associated increase in tax. No toll booths. Never had em, never will. I'm sure if they did build one it would last about as long as motorcycle helmet laws or vehicle inspections did.

    13. Re:Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey if the USgov is willing to give everyone in the US and everyone that travels to the US an unlocked smart phone to ID themselves with, then who are we to complain.

    14. Re:Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      and you weren't required to use ssn for anything else originally either.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    15. Re:Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      no they are evil and want to put the ghosts of the sentient alien space clams back in my head.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    16. Re:Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by afidel · · Score: 1

      Are you seriously holding up Arkansas government as a model for anything but failure?

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    17. Re:Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      Yes they would. It's much faster than using tolls in the first place. Also, it works all the way out and up the east coast, and down to Virginia. In fact, you can get one as a resident of any other state, as it's cheaper than most of the other toll pass options which include a yearly fee in most cases.

    18. Re:Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Then you pick another road. I bypassed one of the toll roads in IL when I drove through because the cost was high and there were other routes. In PA, I couldn't avoid the road. It was the worst interstate I'd ever been on, and I had to pay to drive it. Insult to injury.

    19. Re:Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by flabbergast · · Score: 1

      The booths in Illinois with "no human operator present" existed before I-PASS became so dominant. I remember running a few toll baskets in the suburbs in 2000 because I didn't have any change.

    20. Re:Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The secret part is the NFC chip in the iPhone 5.

    21. Re:Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by sootman · · Score: 1

      And to top it all off, Apple is famous for having patents for things that never see the light of day. I've been waiting ten years for my color-changing case. Like all companies, they patent everything they can think of (which is a whole other problem) but only a fraction of it ever gets made.

      So, long story short: don't worry about it until it's available. And then, DON'T BUY IT.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    22. Re:Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by Godai · · Score: 1

      For the Canada example, I assume you're talking about the 407, the only toll highway in Ontario (and one of two in the country, the other being in Nova Scotia I believe). The 407 is the electronic one.

      I know it's splitting hairs, but it doesn't 'fine' you, it just uses plate recognition to manage the toll. You pay something like $0.25 a kilometre (which is pretty outrageous) and you get charged $3.50 per trip for the 'video recognition' charge. You can knock that down to $0.60 if you have a transponder (yay?). Frankly, it's a sore point with more Toronto residents as the highway is largely empty because of how much it would cost to use. E.g., if you used it to cross the top of the city each way, five days a week, you'd pay something like $300 a month. Of course, that does mean it's never got traffic problems :P

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    23. Re:Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by Mitreya · · Score: 1

      I assume you're talking about the 407,

      Yes, yes, I am. That's the one. Thanks for the response.

      I know it's splitting hairs, but it doesn't 'fine' you, it just uses plate recognition to manage the toll.

      Ah, but what if you are on a rental car? :) According to Budget bastards, _they_ have been charged $50 fine on top of the toll (~$13) and they kindly offer to only charge me only a $25 fine this one time.
      So the plate recognition charge is $3.50? That is very useful, thank you.

    24. Re:Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      But don't try and use it in Florida... they have a different system. And the west coast is different too. IF it's "universal" people would want the convenience, but the toll systems right now are anything but universal.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    25. Re:Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm curious how discussing this equates to paranoia.

      Had you heard of it before now?

      Secret may not be the right word, but I assume you aren't making such comments in all articles with questionable words in the headline.

    26. Re:Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I should add that this is obviously the direction society is headed in, in an incremental fashion, and will likely have different competing implementations (of which iTravel is one).

      But I guess being aware of that and discussing it's implications is "paranoia" and thus should be avoided for the weak minded.

    27. Re:Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      You included an example of not being able to pick another road after you advised someone to just pick another road. Just sayin'.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    28. Re:Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by Godai · · Score: 1

      They claim a $50 fine? God, every time I think I understand how criminal those SOBs are, I find out they're worse than I thought! Well, them or Budget, I'm not sure who are the real bastards here (maybe both?)

      And I just double-checked, it's actually $3.80:

      Video Toll Charge: $0.00 per Trip (with transponder), $3.80 per Trip (no transponder)
      Trip Toll Charge: $0.60 per Trip (with or without transponder)

      So I guess you actually kind of pay $4.60 just for getting on, if you don't have a transponder, and $0.60 if you do.

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    29. Re:Secret HOW? Nice Headline Slashdot... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The conversation was about IL. Many of the interstates in IL were laid next to SHs that were never closed. There are easy options in IL to avoid the toll roads. But I also conceeded that may not be the case everywhere.

      What, you are complaining that I was rational? I should have just said "Pick another road, you fucking lazy idiot." Is that the Slashdot way? Oh, and the toll roads in PA all took cash. Which also excludes them from the forced tracking discussion.

  15. When/if that happens by Gonoff · · Score: 1

    It will be yet another reason to not have an iPhone.

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    1. Re:When/if that happens by EGSonikku · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because no one else uses technology to make life easier. And doing so is evil. Apparently.

      --
      - "Scientia non habet inimicum nisp ignorantem"
    2. Re:When/if that happens by Gonoff · · Score: 1
      Broadcasting my ID across a roomful of strangers to make it simpler for spooks and bureaucrats to keep an eye on me does not improve my life easier in any way that appeals to me.

      I have no wish to make it harder for them though. That would be masochistic and just mean.

      --
      I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
  16. This is getting silly.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What was wrong with a passport? KISS!

  17. the righteous by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 0

    don't see their own hypocrisy

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  18. iPapers please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Destination 1984

  19. Leave your cell phone at home... by jd659 · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    There's no such thing as "illegal download"
    1. Re:Leave your cell phone at home... by siddesu · · Score: 1

      I say we should go all the way and travel naked and blindfolded. That ought to solve all problems.

    2. Re:Leave your cell phone at home... by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      or just don't charge the battery and it be dead when you get to the airport, and toss one of the AA-battery powered phone chargers in your carry-on and charge it in route to your destination.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    3. Re:Leave your cell phone at home... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      In fact, forget the travel. And the blindfold.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  20. Chicken and egg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . 'First you would have to sell industry on Apple's idea. Then you'd have to sell it to travel consumers,' says Neil Hughes of Apple Insider. 'It's a chicken-and-egg problem.'"

    How is the above a chicken & egg problem? FTA's author outlines the steps.

    Not saying I think it's a good idea, but please, write non-garbage for once.

  21. The iProbe by bdwoolman · · Score: 1

    iThought of it first. Mine!

    But will it also photograph and then lase the polyps it finds. Put that in your Instagram.

    Okay. I am going no further with this.

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
  22. the idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thinks that the hipocrisy of others justifies their own

  23. Nice way to spread FUD by Guspaz · · Score: 2

    Somehow a publicly published idea about how to get people through airport security faster and easier is now a "secret plan for searching you at the airport" and comments equating it to all sorts of nasty things...

    It's a public patent, and the goal of the thing is clearly the opposite of what everybody seems to be claiming...

    1. Re:Nice way to spread FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The goal of the thing is for Apple to profit from yet another erosion of your liberty.

      Optional tomorrow, compulsory the day after.

      You. Fucking. Moron.

  24. Attention Obama Drones! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is it we call collusion between the state and industry?

    It's not freedom people. Wake up and smell the tyranny.

  25. Fandroids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just keep eating all the FUD they can serve up.

  26. Re:USA government already ahead of industry on thi by Scowler · · Score: 2

    Ask any big defense company. Government contracts are fabulous things.

  27. Patent Attroneys by kromozone · · Score: 2

    I've spent most of my life reading patents for money. No one, at any company, gives a crap about right and wrong. If it's a novel idea and you think there's some chance of making money on it, you patent it. I'd be reviewing applications for Zyklon B if there was a way to monetize murder.

  28. seems like a slam dunk to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    let's see:

    will it cost a lot of $ to implement? check!

    will it further erode privacy/civil rights? check!

    will it be completely ineffective, demonstrably useless & not improve actual security (vs theatre)? check!

    seems like all Apple need to do is hire Chertoff, misplace a couple of briefcases full of $ and this is a done deal...

    am I missing something?

  29. The jackass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is smug but can't even spell "hypocrisy."

  30. And then by cvtan · · Score: 1

    And then you would have to sell me an iPhone. Urrp.

    --
    Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
    1. Re:And then by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Or get Congress to force you to buy one. They can do that now according to the Supremes (assuming you're American).

    2. Re:And then by causality · · Score: 1

      (assuming you're American)

      Don't worry, they have some of the best working on that one. All they have to do is raise a big enough stink over enough time and artificially generate enough of an outcry. Then they will manage to "harmonize" all of the "security laws" the same way they have internationally harmonized so many copyright laws.

      After all, you don't want the terrorists to win.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    3. Re:And then by afidel · · Score: 1

      No, they actually can't force you to buy one, they can however levy a tax on you if you fail to buy one (a perhaps subtle but important distinction, one expands the commerce clause the other relies on the taxing power).

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  31. again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oblivious hypocrisy strikes.

  32. Finally! A good Apple patent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Thanks to Apple patenting this idea, there is no way this crap will ever make it's way to other devices. Thankyou Apple!

  33. Tin foil hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple's patent calls for the placement of special kiosks around the airport which will automatically exchange data with your phone via a close range wireless technology called near field communication (NFC)

    Tin foil hat bullshit.

    NFC has a range of less than an inch, if you're lucky. It often requires physical contact.

    There is nothing "automatic" about a security checkin where I have to take out my phone and hold/tap it against a scanner.

  34. Better solution by t1oracle · · Score: 1

    Face recognizing cameras. They already have it and it doesn't require a phone that could be hacked. An iPhone ID would only punish the innocent while letting guilty in through the front door.

  35. Sheeple by Eyezen · · Score: 1

    While there will be those of us that know otherwise the masses will eat it up and not think one iota about the consequences.

    1. Re:Sheeple by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      Damn...never a mod point around when I want one. I used to object to the term "sheeple". Not anymore.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  36. Or do the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop checking IDs at all and only search for explosives. Stop the police state. I flew for decades with either no ID or a drivers license. Including to Mexico and Canada.

    The overlords own us.

    1. Re:Or do the right thing by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      not that i disagree but you can kill lots of people on a plane with a gun/knife so I would add weapon searches but make it reasonable, my swiss army knife is not going to be an effective weapon neither is a toenail clippers.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  37. it is not a secret anymore by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    I just read about it on Slashdot.org

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  38. Trusted Travler Programs already exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The TSA has several "Trusted Traveler" programs already. Global Entry, SENTRI, and NEXUS are three of them for "rapid" entry into the US and TSA Preâoe" works in conus.

    I travel a lot but mainly through 5 or 6 different airports. I know which checkpoints are better than others at each airport. That knowledge can easily save me 30-60 minutes each time going through security even through I may have to walk a little further once through.

  39. and ATT will tie a added fee to this by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    and ATT will tie a added fee to this and get apple to lock it down.

  40. Sounds like iOS 6's Passbook by EGSonikku · · Score: 1

    This sounds like a "Proto" version of Apple's "Passbook" app that launched today, alongside iOS6. Not the security part, but flight boarding passes, and expanded beyond travel for movie theater tickets, gift cards and what not.

    http://www.apple.com/ios/whats-new/#passbook

    I'm not seeing a secret apple conspiracy plan, and even if there was one, they decided against NFC and went with Passbook.

    --
    - "Scientia non habet inimicum nisp ignorantem"
  41. Lake In Salt Lake City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lake In Salt Lake City: http://lakeinsaltlakecity.com/

  42. Friendly public reminder. by Yaztromo · · Score: 2

    Before too many more people go off half-cocked, please allow me to remind everyone that every major tech company, particularly Apple, patents all sorts of crazy stuff that they never use. Here is an article detailing 10 patents from the last few years (the article is a year old) of crazy things that had /.ers (and others) predicting all sorts of weird and crazy stuff -- and not a single product has been released using any of them.

    Remember when Apple patented touch gestures for the rear of an iPhone-like device? In the four or five iPhones released since then, have they ever implemented it? No. Seems doubtful they ever will at this point.

    I'd wait until such a device actually exists in the wild before getting excited about it. Like a lot of companies, Apple simply builds up their patent portfolio for offensive and defensive purposes.

    Yaz

  43. Needs NFC by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

    This might be worth talking about if Apple made anything that has NFC, but they don't.

  44. As seen on the commerical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe it is possible to replace all the TSA with Apple genius, I think one of the commercial already giving us a hints.

  45. Your Unique Voice Print by dos4who · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing they plan to use your unique voice signature... which is probably already in their database. C'mon... you telling me that every time you use Apple's Siri or Google's voice-to-text, etc that those giants are not saving all that data? My money's on the fact that they're building a massive biometric database on every single one of us. Thanks, Siri ;)

    --
    "Yes, I have a Disaster Recovery Plan. It's called my Resume"
  46. We all know by kiriath · · Score: 1

    Apple just patented that so it can sue the pants off of any company that tries to do that...

    No conspiracy here, move along...

  47. Re:USA government already ahead of industry on thi by mgbastard · · Score: 1

    We have RFID tags in our passports already, so they are already moving us towards electronic IDs. It's a foregone conclusion that the type of ID done for international flights will eventually crop up in domestic travel as well, for better or worse.

    I microwave any RFID they dare to put in my papers. So should you.

    "oh? no workee? I have a magnetic personality. Electronics just fail around my person."

    --
    Anyone seen my low uid? last seen 10 years ago while panning the #@$# out of Taco's 'web based discussion system'
  48. Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Makes sense, since the phone is a tightly controlled tracking system.
    It is the way that people with an agenda in power can find not just your location but do an extremely sensitive psychological profile and human network analysis with optional real time wiretapping.
    What people don't understand is that to a supercomputer, keeping tabs on the movements, communications and activities of a measly hundred million people or so is really easy, especially when police, traffic control and data carriers are all funneling information into it patriotically. It's really easy. Not anywhere near the realm of simulating nuclear fusion or whatever. You just maintain a huge rolling archive, and then can data mine to your heart's content with a user-friendly interface.
    Of course posting anonymously is most likely not a major barrier to finding someone's identity but since I am having a bad day I figure why not just post what I think today, instead of what I usually do which is to think twice about whether I want what I write to be stored and analyzed forever, either by the government, a potential employer or customer, a friend, etc.. Usually I hit the cancel button before I finish a post. The world is really quite a nastier place than it used to be and the people everyone lets run the place seem to be a lot more cynical and rapacious.

  49. I was surprised, but wait.. by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

    I would like to think Apple would be against such intrusive invasions of privacy and human rights. Oh, hold on, look at Foxconn. Apple continues to support that company and its practices.

    --
    Chewbacon
    The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
  50. Secret Plan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Secret Plan?" It's a patent application, FFS. Published, on the web, for all to see. Nothing secret about it.

    Hey, let me tell you about my moneymaking plan. It involves putting all my money into cash and tossing it out the window as I drive through NYC.

  51. Re:USA government already ahead of industry on thi by fermion · · Score: 1
    And how is this new, or secure? Presumably they could already receive signals from our phone. The US government has already received records from all the phone companies, and there is no reason to believe that those records are not updated in a an effectively continuous fashion. The only reason that they may not continuously track us using our phones is that the communication and computing hardware is simply too expensive. This is why paranoid people buy prepaid cell phones and then minutes with cash.

    OTOH this would be the most stupid way to screen passengers. If a terrorist was going to carry an iPhone, it could be register to a perfectly legitimate person. Is it illegal to carry a phone that is not registered to you? What people are missing is that as soon as you buy a ticket, all this information is available. I don't think they are talking abut dumping all your content into a government computer. That can be done already when you hook your phone to a USB charger at the airport. What they are talking about is using your phone for ID. And that is a stupid thing to do. Driver licensees are already forgeable. If an iPhone is ID, then we will have planes being blown up all over the place.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  52. Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if my phone is able to pass security, does it matter who is holding it?

  53. Terrorists caught by malbosher · · Score: 1

    How many terrorists has the TSA caught...0

  54. Okay, new plan Achmed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New plan Achmed, with which, Ynch Allah, we crush the infidels. We hack Apple, THEN jack jets. We... iJack them! Hahahahahah

    Shookran, Cupertino! Allah O Akbar, yiyiyiyiyiyiyiyiyyiyiyeeeeee!!!

  55. Re:USA government already ahead of industry on thi by Scowler · · Score: 1

    I am not saying this is new, or secure, or even a good idea. It just seems to be what US policymakers have decreed.

  56. chicken and egg by holophrastic · · Score: 1

    I think people are idiots. The chicken and egg problem isn't a cause and effect problem. It's a language definition problem. The question's the only issue.

    1. eggs came first because lizards laid eggs long before chickens evolved. so we're talking about "chicken eggs" not "eggs". So we rephrase: "what came first, the chicken or the chicken egg"

    2. at some point, something that wasn't a chicken laid an egg from which a chicken hatched

    3. if your definition of a "chicken egg" is "laid by a chicken", then the chicken came first, necessarily by your definition. on the other hand, if your definition of a "chicken egg" is an egg that hatched into a chicken, then the chicken egg came first, necessarily, by your definition.

    4. if you don't believe in evolution, then the whole question is meaningly, since your god probably made them both together about ten years ago, when he created you as a full-grown adult.

    So it's a stupid question because all it actually asks is for your definition of a chicken egg. And that's really of no interest most of the time. Most scientists define evolution as happening within the egg, so the egg would be a chicken egg after it was laid and before it hatches. So the egg comes first.

  57. ...Apple is smoking Cannabis, lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, just wow.. that's all I have to say really. It's yet another reason among more and more they seem to just toss out there for us to NOT buy or even want to buy apple, if the double,tripple,quadruple price tag versus better phones or tablets running android were not enough.

  58. Ever heard of Amtrak? by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

    Or Eurail?

    I suggest you try a train next time.

    1. Re:Ever heard of Amtrak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TSA is there, too. I guess iPhones will be mandatory for citizens to buy now, like health insurance.

    2. Re:Ever heard of Amtrak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Outside of a handful of corridors, Amtrak is pretty horrible. I did look in to using them not that long ago, so here's how the breakdown came out.

      Driving: 6 hours.
      Flying: No direct flights between the two cities, so once you take the plane change and dealing with security into account, about 6 hours.
      Amtrak: Actually cost more than the plane tickets. Not by much, but still more. No direct routes, so there was a train change. Unfortunately, that meant an 8 hour layover waiting for the connection.

      I drove.

    3. Re:Ever heard of Amtrak? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      Or Eurail?

      I suggest you try a train next time.

      Certainly. What line do I take to go from the east coast of the US to the EU? How do I get home from Calgary, AB? How many transfers are needed between Japan and the east coast?

  59. Apple's just doing what they know best here by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 1

    Seeing an opportunity to take money from TSA (if they can get them to buy into this crazy scheme), they've put out some feelers. After all, who doesn't like nice shiny new tech gadgets? Like those backscatter scanners over there!

    //can't cry any more, must laugh at the absurdity of it all

  60. Who told you public healthcare == no competition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Here in the UK we have public healthcare. We also have private healthcare. And competition.

    Seriously, your "competition" you have over there is the same as the old Soviet competition: a choice of one.

    Unless you are going to emigrate to a different state just because you want to change healthcare provider, you have no competition.

  61. Outrageous patent by ArgumentBoy · · Score: 1

    A truly outrageous patent. How in the world can a company patent a way to communicate with the U.S. government? The government has to design the socket and that controls what the plug has to be. Not just for this reason alone, the patent system has to be blowtorched and started up again from scratch.

  62. probably Zuckerberg's idea by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Hmm so a device constantly transmits all my most important personal info using a VERY insecure technology. Are you sure this wasn't Zuckerberg's idea? Plus, anyone planning or already convicted of something bad would probably purposely NOT CARRY AN iPHONE! So this does absolutely nothing. I say go for it, Apple! I'm waiting patiently for Apple to burn to ground for making such stupid decisions and being so unbelievably evil and this will speed it up a lot.

  63. This is invention? by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    HOW?

    Seriously, can we just abolish patents...this would be funny if it wasn't so darn sad.

  64. Jailbreak by rolakyng · · Score: 1

    I can see someone hacking and using the NFC to get the info needed. Similar to the wave on credit cards.

  65. You see?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apply just wants to control everything. Now they are getting in bed with the government. Who knows what other information they will give the TSA, as theoretically, they could tell the TSA anything you do with your phone.

  66. How to avoid X-ray scanners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last time I flew from JFK it appears they installed X-ray machines on every checkpoint and run everyone through them, no questions asked. (It does not say anywhere that those are X-ray, but they are not metal detectors either.) So next vacation I will need to travel with my 3-year old, and exposing him to unknown level of radiation is the last thing I want to do. I cannot afford to become a carriage-traveling luddite either, my spouse would not approve. (She thinks TSA is needed to make her safe.)

    Any suggestions how to avoid X-ray without police and fire crew being summoned?

  67. Yawn by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

    On my way home yesterday, I misplaced my boarding pass somewhere between the airport coffee shop and the TSA checkpoint. I was able to use the airline app on my Android phone to present an electronic version of my boarding pass and was able to board my plane. I was also able to board my connecting flight using the same app. I don't see how Apple's current version would act any different, especially since the iPhone doesn't have NFC.

    Sure Apple applied for a patent, but it as past performance has shown, it doesn't necessarily mean that they will actually deliver it to the consumer. At least not right away. When and if they do, if it means going through the checkpoint faster then I'm all for it. I mean TSA is already rummaging through my stuff and looking at my naked image, how much more intrusive can they really get?

    --
    These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
  68. Re:USA government already ahead of industry on thi by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

    We have RFID tags in our passports already, so they are already moving us towards electronic IDs. It's a foregone conclusion that the type of ID done for international flights will eventually crop up in domestic travel as well, for better or worse.

    I microwave any RFID they dare to put in my papers. So should you.

    "oh? no workee? I have a magnetic personality. Electronics just fail around my person."

    While I agree with the sentiment, that's illegal when it comes to passports. They are government property, not yours, and you can be charged with destroying government property if you microwave one. Or you could just be refused entry when you arrive somewhere with a defective passport.

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  69. Are you even listening to yourself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How would you prove the phone is yours??
    By your face--just as you stated.
    That's all the TSA has to go on right now, when you're asked for your driver's license.

    Man, /. sucks.

  70. Re:Who told you public healthcare == no competitio by wooferhound · · Score: 1

    ObamaCare does not provide health care
    it raises the cost of health insurance
    then forces you to buy it . . .

    --
    We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
  71. Medicine is a cartel, of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FDA enforces the cartel on medicines and medical devices.
    State licensing requirements enforce the cartel of personnel and hospitals.
    State licensing requirements enforce the cartel of insurance services.

    The US is a cartelized economy, it can't possibly perform with a free market in these services, and doesn't even have to try.

    The scientific method says you haven't done the experiment yet.

  72. Ask friends and neighbors, other MDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone has to do this every time you change communities : find a dentist, MD and auto mechanic. Diplomas on the wall aren't the answer, as the difference between best and average in all measurable aspects of human performance is 10 : 1. E.g. heart surgeries and measures of morbity and mortality.

    It is really important to not get the guy who is in the lower 10% of heart surgeons.

  73. NFC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's not forget that Apple would have to actually put NFC into a phone, so this could be another 2-4 years before that happens. Let the others work out the bugs first, then they can add it in and say they invented it.