Slashdot Mirror


Illegal Downloading Now a Crime In Japan With Increased Penalties

eldavojohn writes "Although downloading songs without paying for them in Japan used to be a civil offense starting in 2010, it is now a crime with new penalties of up to two years in prison or fines of up to two million yen ($25,700). The lobbying group behind this push for more extreme penalties is none other than the RIAJ (the Japanese RIAA). The BBC notes this applies to both music and video downloads which may put anime studios in a particularly uncomfortable position."

4 of 286 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Fighting Piracy is Good for Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Except that the only way for anti-piracy to "win" is to take general purpose computers out of the public's hands and move everyone into walled garden ecosystems, which would kill open source software.

    For as long as people can use computers to share files, they will. The only way around that is to replace the public's computers with devices that don't run unsigned software and don't play back unlicenced media.

  2. Re:The goalposts is too mobile. by SAN66 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about we don't wreck anyone's lives?

  3. Re:Why not go after the real problem? by Rogerborg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I get your point, but the kid didn't have $999 in the first place, and the purchasers of bootleg DVDs don't have that $1.3 million. If we accept those numbers, then we're just confirming the delusional math of the the "Associations" (pronounced "cartels").

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  4. Re:The goalposts is too mobile. by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It would be sort of like if you refused to ever prosecute any store break-ins or shoplifting

    No, it's nothing like that at all.

    A store owner has a store full of stuff. If the government disappeared, he'd still have a store full of stuff. He might have to protect the stuff himself, or he may have to pay someone to protect it - but nevertheless, he has stuff. If someone shoplifts, he loses some finite amount of that stuff, and he no longer sells it.

    A songwriter has a pretty tune. If the government disappeared, he'd still have a pretty tune. There is no way to protect this pretty tune - but it doesn't really matter because even if someone "steals" it, he can still hum the pretty tune. If he's lucky, his pretty tunes will turn the head of a patron of some sort and he might actually make some money. He could also make some money by performing the pretty song.

    Short of a patron or a performance, the only reason a songwriter holds anything of value at all is because of a government subsidy. Taking away the subsidy has no moral hazard at all. If the system isn't working to the benefit of society in aggregate, then the system should be changed.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.