Slashdot Mirror


Bruce Perens: The Day I Blundered Into the Nuclear Facility

Bruce Perens writes "I found myself alone in a room, in front of a deep square or rectangular pool of impressively clear, still water. There was a pile of material at the bottom of the pool, and a blue glow of Cherenkov radiation in the water around it. To this day, I can't explain how an unsupervised kid could ever have gotten in there."

57 of 181 comments (clear)

  1. So... I read the article. by Nationless · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is that it?

    1. Re:So... I read the article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      TL;DR

    2. Re:So... I read the article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is that it?

      "The real question is..."What kind of spin doctor excuse covers this lapse of security?"
      Answer: The same kind of bullshit that comes out of the nuclear industry when caught with their pants down. Nuclear is Unclear.

      Why would it need to be more secured than it was? Holy crap, loosen the straps on your tinfoil hat a little.

      It's like a kid finding a box of used needles... zomg how did that possibly happen, what about teh consequences?!!1

      A car barreling down the road at you with nothing but bare pavement separating your path from his is more dangerous.

    3. Re:So... I read the article. by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      I guess cancer is kind of like a super power.

    4. Re:So... I read the article. by cvtan · · Score: 3, Funny

      I thought it was part of the dialog from Zork.
      "You have entered a dark passage. If it weren't for the glow from Cherenkov radiation, you might be eaten by a grue."

      --
      Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
    5. Re:So... I read the article. by F34nor · · Score: 3, Funny

      Have you played text Pac-Man? "You are in a hallway, there are floating balls at waist height to the east and west, in the distance your hear what you think are ghosts."

    6. Re:So... I read the article. by quenda · · Score: 5, Funny

      I guess cancer is kind of like a super power.

      or so Lance Armstrong would like us to believe.

    7. Re:So... I read the article. by rioki · · Score: 5, Informative

      This was a scientific test reactor... The security is at the gate and they passed that. The actual room is totally safe. The "old" neutron test reactor of the TH-Munich could be visited. If you fell into the water you would need treatment; for desalination. That is they would rub you down with lotion, because the distilled water would remove the salts in your outer skin. Now the "new" one on the other hand can't be seen, but not because of radiation, but because it is a high pressure reactor. OMG I saw a nuclear reactor...

    8. Re:So... I read the article. by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Funny

      Is that it?

      No, in some countries the second part is censored. You might not have discovered how he later discovered how he had amazing powers over women and his incredible steamy sex sessions. I will never forget those pictures.

    9. Re:So... I read the article. by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2

      Is that it?

      Indeed. Such rooms are part of the standard guided tours at nuclear facilities. And you do see Cerenkov radiation with your own eyes. Of course the water is enough to shield you.

      Now if he had jumped into the "pool" and took a swim, that would have been a story!

    10. Re:So... I read the article. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Funny

      That is they would rub you down with lotion

      Doesn't sound like the sort of place they should let children into.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:So... I read the article. by rmstar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Does Pac-Man have a waist?

      In the same way most americans have one (sorry, couldn't resist).

    12. Re:So... I read the article. by damien_kane · · Score: 4, Funny

      That is they would rub you down with lotion

      Doesn't sound like the sort of place they should let children into.

      It's better than giving them the hose, again

    13. Re:So... I read the article. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

      Yeah. Sounds like it was probably a TRIGA or similar reactor. These are designed such that drowning is actually a bigger hazard than radiation.

      Seriously - these reactors usually had life preservers to prevent drowning in the event that someone fell into the pool. If you did fall in, unless you were an idiot and intentionally swam down to the reactor, you were more likely to die due to suffocation/drowning than to have any health effects from radiation.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  2. BMRR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    BNL had three research reactors.

    Not sure whether BMRR or HFBR were water-moderated, but I'd bet it was the Brookhaven Medical Research Reactor. A bunch of beautiful glowing stuff at the bottom of a deep pool of water is a common configuration for a research reactor used for the production of medical isotopes.

    1. Re:BMRR? by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      storage of spent fuel is also done in pools with borated water of course. The answer to Bruce's question is that his parent wasn't doing his job. The danger to Bruce even had he swam & dived ten foot deep in the pool was zero (divers even go into flooded cavity with reactor head open during refueling). He should be thankful he got to see the pretty blue glow with complete safety.

      Still wimpy compared to Technocrat, Bruce, you don't allow comments there. You want a site with traffic again you'll have to open the floodgates of hell. --Ralph

  3. The 60s and 70s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think Bruce might be looking at the past through the lens of today. In the 60s, nuclear plants and labs had a couple of security guards to protect from theft and whatnot. They didn't carry guns. Unless there were secret things going on, these places weren't heavily guarded. Nuclear power wasn't considered a security issue. Nor were airports, train stations, etc.

    1. Re:The 60s and 70s by ceoyoyo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Lots of universities had research reactors (a few still do). They had no more security than some bored grad students working in the outer lab. If it was an open house even they would have been too busy to look after every wandering kid.

    2. Re:The 60s and 70s by hawguy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Lots of universities had research reactors (a few still do). They had no more security than some bored grad students working in the outer lab. If it was an open house even they would have been too busy to look after every wandering kid.

      When I was in high school we did a tour of university's research reactor, and like you said, the only people there were a few grad students and an operator (or maybe he was a professor?) - no armed guards, no fancy security systems, we just had to sign in with the student at the front desk. We weren't allowed in the room that had the reactor pool,but we could see it (and the blue Cherenkov Radiation glow) through a large thick glassed window. They said that the water was sufficient to contain the radiation but they didn't want many people in the reactor room since any contaminants in the water could become radioactive.

      We were standing in the room that had the door to the reactor room, so I don't think it would have been hard for a kid to accidentally gain access to the reactor room if someone inadvertently left the door open or didn't pull it closed after they left the room.

      But at the time, the coolest thing in the building was the remote manipulator arms they used for working with radioactive materials. After playing with those arms, I decided I was going to have a career in nuclear science. Though somehow I ended up in IT instead.

    3. Re:The 60s and 70s by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Back in 2006 I walked directly through Heathrow without ever being checked. Jetlagged all to hell I took a side door, dressed in a business suit and looking authoritative, zombied my way through a maze of corridors and past a desk of men staring intently at a monitor, before finding my way outside the airport.

      On a subsequent trip, confused about the flight, I asked a man with a submachine gun the route to my gate, went there immediately, got there before the security team, and sat down watching every other passenger being frisked and scanned. The security guard was even there, someone pointed me out and obviously asked him a question, he shook his head no.

      The more things change, eh?

    4. Re:The 60s and 70s by bmo · · Score: 2

      In the late 70s I was doing yard work for an oceanographer and biologist down the road from me. We hopped in the truck one day because he had to go to the Graduate School of Oceanography in Saunderstown RI, which was literally a mile away, to get some stuff he was working on.

      The URI GSO has a research reactor. We just walked in, he did his stuff, and we left. No guards, nothing. Not even a receptionist especially on a Saturday. ID? On a 13 year old kid? You kidding?

      --
      BMO

    5. Re:The 60s and 70s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A lot of those research reactors have a lot less material in them than people picture when told it is a nuclear reactor. Some of them require considerable disassembly to remove material. Others would require major operations to actually get the material any distance away due to the radiation. In one case when asked "What if someone just swam down there and grabbed some of the material?" the response was "They would be dead before getting out the door with it." So if anything, the amount of security needed is based on their concern someone will damage equipment or do something stupid, not so much getting away with the radioactive material.

    6. Re:The 60s and 70s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've got you beat: They let us walk THROUGH the reactor in either the 6th or 7th grade as part of one of those summer-school programs. It was on the local military base (not long before the glorious (Clinton? Bush?) era base closures happened. A town with 5+ bases, two of them AFBs, all closed and sold off to commercial interests...).

      Still, one of the most awesome memories of my early life.

    7. Re:The 60s and 70s by Anachragnome · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I used to live in Mountain View, CA. when I was a teen. A friend and I used to ride our bicycles out on the levies that abounded along the southern San Francisco Bay--commonly know as the "Baylands"--often following the wooden catwalks that stretched for miles over the water surfaces that the levies partitioned off. The top of these levies were used as security roads around the eastern side of Moffet Field and Nasa's Ames Research Center.

      We soon realized that as long as we bypassed a security check-point near the north end of the base, using the catwalks, that once we were beyond the security roads on the levee, nobody gave us a second glance. I guess they assumed we were military kids or something, because we were able to ride our bicycles right past the tarmac by going through an open gate in the security fence--only once did anyone say anything to us and that was to tell us that we were supposed to walk our bikes when we were inside the hangars. We spent many hours wandering around those hangars that summer. Ames had the neatest stuff--helicopters with wings, jets with VTO rotors, a helicopter with no windshield (mind you, this was the early 80's--I'd never heard of a "drone" before), models of every sort lined up for wind-tunnel testing, etc. We once went out there in the middle of a hot, summer night and watched a large jet take off (judging by the lights and noise) and barely caught sight of a totally silent aircraft follow it off the ground less then 3 seconds behind the first, this second aircraft only being visible by virtue of creating a silhouette against the brightly lit Bay-Area sky--otherwise it was totally silent and had zero lighting. Not sure why they'd be doing so, but it looked like they were towing another aircraft under cover of darkness. Pretty exciting, especially for a kid.

      I somehow don't think that one could stroll into that place as easily these days. Lucky we didn't get shot.

    8. Re:The 60s and 70s by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Informative

      When I went to the Cyclotron (the name for the Texas A&M nuclear reactor), there was no security, other than a badge-swipe door that runs off student ID. I was escorted, so no idea if mine would have worked. Once in, there was no security at all I could see. There were few other people, but we were escorted by an "elder" of the facility, so they likely knew him by sight.

    9. Re:The 60s and 70s by cbelt3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Bingo. I can recall being in the research reactor at U Mo in Columbia in the early 1970's. People forget how accessible facilities were before 9/11 . Apparently we're so used to the Police State that we've created that it's pretty much taken for granted.

      Which is a great pity. The less accessible cool research is for our children, the less interested our children will be in becoming cool researchers. Big Bang Theory and Mohawk Guy nonwithstanding.

    10. Re:The 60s and 70s by Bootsy+Collins · · Score: 2

      No, he's trying to tell you that cyclotrons and nuclear reactors are completely different things. What you said was inaccurate.

  4. This is it! by binarylarry · · Score: 3, Funny

    This explains Bruce's Open Source super powers.

    It's like peter parker but instead of a spider, its a pool of radioactive cherenkov radiation.

    I knew it!

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    1. Re:This is it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Some radiation is in fact radioactive. In particular neutron radiation can undergo beta decay.
      Cerenkov radiation, however is stable.

    2. Re:This is it! by QuantumPion · · Score: 2

      While free neutrons are unstable, unless they are flying through empty space you would not notice. The mean lifetime of a neutron bouncing around matter before being absorbed is on the order of microseconds, while the half-life is 10 minutes.

  5. Adventure? by Holistic+Missile · · Score: 2

    The way it starts out, it reminded me of the old Scott Adams adventure games from the Atari 800 days...

    --
    When you're dead, you don't know you're dead. It only affects the people around you. Same thing when you're stupid.
  6. Umm... by SGDarkKnight · · Score: 2

    Thats the whole story? I was sort of expecting more. Well, to the final question of that rather short article. It was most likely the area where they kept their spent fuel bundles. I know in some nuclear power plants, the spent fuel bundles have to be kept in a pool of water for a number of years until their half life is met, and they can be transfered to a dry storage facility. Normally the "pool" is not guarded or locked due to personel constantly going in and out, but there is radiation checks that are done upon exiting the area, also you wear a device for monitoring your radiation dose.

    As for the blue glow, you can read all about it on wiki

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherenkov_radiation

    --

    ...A no smoking section in a restaurant is like having a no peeing section in a swimming pool...
    1. Re:Umm... by Radworker · · Score: 2

      I can assume that you have not been in a commercial plant. The spent fuel pool is a locked room inside the vital area and is key card access controlled. The fuel is not being kept there because it is too radioactive. It is being stored there until decay heat becomes manageable. The area is typically monitored by area radiation monitors (ARM) and you will typically have a self reading dosimeter (MG,SAIC, or similar ) as well as a TLD (thermo-luminescent dosimeter) for record purposes. You may or may not use a frisker when you leave the immediate area depending on what work is being performed at the time. You will do a full body frisk when you leave the RCA (radiation controlled area). These terms and procedures are US ones but the rest of the world has basically the same setup that I describe assuming that we are talking about a PWR type reactor.

  7. A: Blundering into a nuclear facility by slew · · Score: 4, Funny
    1. Re:A: Blundering into a nuclear facility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This.

      Whoever submitted this is either Bruce himself, or some blog reading whore. Nothing more than a "me too" attention whoring. The editors should be ashamed of themselves.

    2. Re:A: Blundering into a nuclear facility by fustakrakich · · Score: 4, Funny

      Q: What do Bruce Perens and an 82-year old nun have in common?

      Both are creatures of habit?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    3. Re:A: Blundering into a nuclear facility by binarylarry · · Score: 3, Funny

      Both are virgins, of course.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    4. Re:A: Blundering into a nuclear facility by plover · · Score: 4, Funny

      Q: What do Bruce Perens and an 82-year old nun have in common?

      Both are creatures of habit?

      You can kiss a nun once or twice, but don't get into the habit.

      --
      John
  8. Glowing Cousin by newsman220 · · Score: 2

    I have family who lived in and around Oak Ridge in the 50's. Some of them got booted to make way for the plant. Legend has it one cousin was a technician at the plant, walking around with his clipboard up when he went through the wrong door. He stopped walking, looked down, and realized he was standing at the edge of the pool with the nuclear pile in it. He described the same blue glow. Dropped the clipboard, quit his job and moved to the Bahamas to track satellites for NASA.

    1. Re:Glowing Cousin by muon-catalyzed · · Score: 2

      It's called radiation theraphy. The reactor pool is best for treating your rheuma, take a 5 minute dip, swim around a bit, just keep your 6 feet safe distance from the Cherenkov glow and the fuel rods, it is pretty refreshing!

  9. This sounds very improbable by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 4, Funny

    The only way this could happen is if the guy in sector 7g was grossly incompetent.

  10. So what? by Charliemopps · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I live about 4 miles from a reactor. You can walk in and look down at the reactor during business hours. They commonly take local school children on tours. Unless you're going to dive into the water and start trying to yank fuel rods out by hand I don't really see what you could do with it. I suppose you could drop a pipe bomb in there but I don't really think it would do much.

  11. And that's a minute or so of my life... by logicassasin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... that I'll never get back.

    This was not "News For Nerds", it was "the ramblings of a guy on the internet".

    --
    Fifty watts per channel, baby cakes.
    1. Re:And that's a minute or so of my life... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think Bruce Perens has done enough for computing that he's considered more than "a guy on the internet."

  12. Oak Ridge used to hand out "hot" dimes by dltaylor · · Score: 3, Informative

    Lived in Chattanooga for a while "back when"; school trips sometimes went out to Oak Ridge. Souvenirs included a dime in a little case, and it was "fun" to watch a Geiger counter react to it.

    Doesn't surprise me that Bruce could get near a non-weapons reactor.

    1. Re:Oak Ridge used to hand out "hot" dimes by dltaylor · · Score: 5, Informative
  13. And then I found $10! by djnanite · · Score: 2

    Which was nice...

  14. Description reminds me of... by hotdiggity · · Score: 3, Funny
    You find yourself alone in a room, in front of a deep square or rectangular pool of impressively clear, still water.

    There is a pile of material at the bottom of the pool, and a blue glow of Cherenkov radiation in the water around it.

    > TAKE PILE

    You cannot take that item.

    > INVENTORY

    You have:

    • a rope
    • a watch
    • non-radiation-resisting clothes

    > GO NORTH

    You cannot go that way.

    > JUMP IN POOL

    Sorry, I don't know what you mean.

    > ENTER POOL

    You have jumped into the pool.

    You have died from radiation poisoning.

  15. Negligent escort. by dfenstrate · · Score: 2

    At some of these research reactors, you can pull the rods out of the reactor shortly after criticality and take your measurements with the fuel rod in your hand.
    Individual research reactor loads may or may not be particularly dangerous- you can have a radiation well above background level, but far below the rate required to cause health issues.
    However, a recently irradiated fuel assembly from a power reactor will kill you in short order*, if not shielded by a lot of water.

    As for the young Mr. Peren's misadventure, these places are built for adults with the security clearance and knowledge required to get into the facility in the first place. These knowledgable, responsible adults may then escort visitors on arranged tours.

    A visitor can be shown (more or less) whatever their escort has access too. The escort's duty is to keep the visitors out of trouble while showing them around. It seems as though Bruce's escort was a bit negligent (and knew it, from the student's displeasure.)

    *perversely, the high radiation level of a used fuel assembly is a bit of a security feature. You can't steal something that will kill you before you can get out the door.

    --
    Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
  16. The 60s and 70s? Try modern times. by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can still see the characteristic and beautiful Cherenkov radiation at the research reactor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. I've seen it a number of times.

    Up until recently, it contained 1400 pounds of highly-enriched (weapons grade) U-235 in 58-pound bundles. It is in a building across from a 7-level parking ramp and an 80,000-person football stadium.

    There are a number of such "Research and Test Reactors" around the US.

    A 2005 ABC News report found:

    - "No guards. No metal detectors. Bags were brought into the reactor room. Doors to the building are open during the day, and no IDs are required for entry."

    - "The building was undergoing major renovation, and construction workers, large trucks and building materials surrounded the rear exterior."

    - "The university Web site includes a 'virtual tour' and detailed photos, descriptions and diagrams of the reactor, the fuel elements and the control room. The reactor manager informed the Fellows that tours had to be scheduled three weeks in advance and that a locked door with a window view of the reactor was the closest they could get. But a friendly professor told the Fellows about a basement entry to the reactor room, where a reactor operator opened the door and let the Fellows photograph the reactor from the doorway. Two other operators allowed the Fellows to come inside carrying their tote bags, and briefly take photographs about 15 feet from the reactor's base. No campus security ever approached the Fellows."

    An 2004 New York Times report found:

    - "[UWNR's] fuel is weapons-grade uranium. If it were stolen, experts say, it could give terrorists or criminals a major head start on an atomic bomb."

    - "[...] out of concern that the uranium might be turned into bomb fuel, the Department of Energy has spent millions of dollars to develop lower-grade fuel and convert scores of reactors to run on it. [...] But the six campus reactors in this country are not among them."

    - "Campus reactors have far less security than places where the government keeps bomb-grade uranium, and they may have foreign students of unknown political sympathies."

    - "[...] the fuel now in the campus reactors is dangerously radioactive, making it hard to handle. [...] however, that highly enriched uranium was an easier fuel from which to build a bomb than is plutonium."

    - "The reactor operators are paid $10.50 an hour. They recently got a raise to that level [...] because someone discovered that campus file clerks were paid more than the reactor operators.

    - "[...] the current fuel load will last about 108 years at current rates of use."

    "The truck is the real threat. You want to make sure the truck stays away 250 feet minimum." - Ronald Timm, Former Department of Energy security analyst

    Here, the primary entrance to a major parking ramp is about 50 feet away.

    Also, it's not like it's really a mystery what he saw at BNL. There have only been so many reactors there in the last 60 years. It's odd, beautiful, and I suppose comparatively rare for a person to see, but it's not a big deal.

  17. this isn't Hollywood by v1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    "They would be dead before getting out the door with it."

    My initial reaction to this is "this isn't Hollywood, where two 9mm bullets makes a car explode." Radiation in fatal doses takes at leas hours and usually days or weeks to kill you. If it's extremely high it could give you a pounding headache, dizzy, very sick to your stomach, or possibly even pass out. But if you got to that point quickly you'd have been many times over the fatal dose. A high enough dose of xrays can knock you unconscious, but even that requires a more energetic source than decay.

    Basically what I'm saying is radiation poisoning isn't instant. All but the most intense exposure will simply write your death sentence. It will take at least many hours to play out and actually stop you from breathing. You could probably swim down and grab a rod and try to muscle it to the surface. (it's very dense) By the time you got to the surface you might even be starting to show signs of blistering on your hand that is holding the rod, but even that is more likely to be in the 10 minute range. The heat the rod is producing without the water cooling it would probably be more of a bother for you. If it was radioactive enough, you'd be a dead man walking, but walking for sure, for awhile. (and setting off every radiation alarm you got near on your way out the door with the rod) Oh, and it might be messing with your vision when you got close to the rods. Some of the people that were cleaning up at chernobyl got their skin tingling and got to see the "fairy lights" sparkling around them, which had nothing to do with actual sparkles around them, it was messing with their nervous system at that point. A lot of those people died, a good chunk of them 2-20 weeks later.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:this isn't Hollywood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are multiple ways radiation can kill you on several different time scales. You can't just give a "typical" number, because it depends on the does. Weaker doses that mess up your ability to regenerate blood can take weeks to kill you, higher doses that stop you from being able to absorb nutrients from food can kill you in several days. Damage to the nervous system can be from days to hours or less depending on the dose.

      And remember, one of the potential reasons to have research reactor is to generate short half-life, high activity materials that would decay too fast to be produced and shipped from somewhere else. The dosing could fall anywhere on the scale depending on exactly what research they are doing. Not to mention the really high stuff I've read reports of from national labs (although they would have much higher security than a university), where in one case, efforts to dislodge a stuck sample was foiled at one point by the radiation melting plastic tools being used by a remote controlled robot.

    2. Re:this isn't Hollywood by QuantumPion · · Score: 4, Informative

      Dose from an unshielded spent fuel bundle (or research reactor) is far greater than other typical sources - on the order of 50,000 to 1,000,000 R/hr. These kinds of doses can be instantly fatal. An HP tech explained to me once that if you placed a spent fuel bundle on a football field, and ran towards it as fast as you could, you would drop dead before you could touch it. If you swam to the bottom of a research reactor to try to touch the fuel you would most certainly become incapacitated by the time you got close enough to touch it.

  18. Research facilities by drolli · · Score: 3, Informative

    are the most unsafe place you can imagine. I worked in a lab where a small accelerator building was attached. All doors were unlocked an unsupervised (only the "tritium" room where most radioactive sample were stored) was locked. The rest was only locked/with alarms when the accelerator was running. Some (quite small, but highly active) source used for the lab courses were (in a pile of shielding material), essentially open around the clock; and that was in the mid-90s. Everybody who knew where these were could just go in the building, enter the room and take them (if you are stupid enough....). In the same building i opened a shelf (which had no warning signs) and suddenly found contaminated tools (which were marked).

    If we had an open day, and the hand of a four year old would have been small enough to insert into the hole into which the samples were let down by a rod to activate them, also something bad could have happened.

    At least fore radioactive stuff there was a mandatory handling lesson, and standard procedures. What really annoys me is when it comes to chemicals in science labs. You would be surprised how much radioation it takes to result in the same increase in cancer rate as for certain chemicals commonly used; which is exactly the reason why industry either banned these or is using them with very good precautions and good working equipment, while in sciene any untrained grad student just uses these without gloves.

    I agree that even on a 'open door' day a door with seriously radioactive material in an large accellerator facility should be locked, but its easy for me to imagine that its not. I believe that the biggest problem is "build a fence around the facility and we know everybody inside" method. That worked in the last century during normal operation (some other person would be spotted quite reliably), but on open door days it obviously does not work and i seriously doubt it works with the current fluctuation of inhabitants of a scientific building.

    After one or two years in science, the first thing which i did when entering a new working space in an unknown area was to clean the table very carefully and look in all drawers on my desk. (and radioactivity was the least of my concerns....).

  19. Re:Spent Fuel Pool by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 2

    Exactly. A kid shouldn't be able to walk in and see a 30 foot deep pool of water without the presence of a trained lifeguard and the availability of a suitable sized flotation device.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  20. My father did probably worse by damaki · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My father use to work for the French national police force. It's a half police, half military police corp.
    One day, he visited a nuclear power plant for whatever security reason. With a group of people, he walked around one of these famous pool, then just clumsily fell in it. He was of course decontaminated as soon as I happened, and well, he still has no cancer decades after, even as a heavy smoker.
    Sadly, he did not get any superpower either, just a smart kid, years later ;)

    --
    Stupidity is the root of all evil.
    1. Re:My father did probably worse by TuringCheck · · Score: 2

      You'd have to dive to get any signifficant dose of radiation. For the typical research reactors I doubt anyone can hold his breath enough to take a lethal dose (munching at the material excepted :-)