Slashdot Mirror


Russian High-Tech Export Scandal Produces 8 Arrests in Houston

Penurious Penguin writes "Millionaire Alexander Fishenko, owner of US-based Arc Electronics Inc, and seven others have been arrested in Houston Texas, with a total of 11 indicted in a conspiracy to smuggle advanced microelectronics from the U.S. to Russia. The technology allegedly involves components of radar, weapons guidance, and detonators. Amongst the evidence are accounting records indicating notable similarity between the revenue of Arc Electronics and the Russian Federation's defense spending; intercepted phone calls and emails; and a letter to Arc Electronics from a Russian domestic intelligence lab complaining of defective microchips . A Russian foreign ministry spokesman has denied there were any intelligence connections in the affair."

56 of 83 comments (clear)

  1. I can no longer sit back by GeneralTurgidson · · Score: 4, Funny

    and allow Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrination, Communist subversion and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious microchips.

    1. Re:I can no longer sit back by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      The US government paid to develop advanced weapons systems that give them a tactical advantage over everybody else -- at least that was their intent. So why shouldn't they get to keep that advantage as long ad they can?

    2. Re:I can no longer sit back by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      and allow Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrination, Communist subversion and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious microchips.

      Somebody makes microchips out of our precious body fluids? Yuk!

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    3. Re:I can no longer sit back by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Somebody makes microchips out of our precious body fluids?

      Yep, kinda

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    4. Re:I can no longer sit back by Noughmad · · Score: 1

      and allow Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrination, Communist subversion and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious microchips.

      Somebody makes microchips out of our precious body fluids? Yuk!

      The silicon mines are dying. Pentiums are people!

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    5. Re:I can no longer sit back by Hillgiant · · Score: 2

      Strictly speaking, the perpetrators in this case were motivated by capitalism, not communism.

      (yes you were making a joke. but really, its been 21 years since the USSR went kaputnik)

      --
      -
    6. Re:I can no longer sit back by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 3, Funny

      But the US can still nuke anyone from the orbit, so the money was not well-spent in the first place.

      We should rather care about the quality of our drinking water. With current safety standards, any Russian spy could put chemicals in it that cause homsexuality, and I guess we all know what consequences that would have.

  2. Microelectronics? by hjf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Microelectronics that are "components of radar, weapons guidance, and detonators". So, a DSP? A microcontroller? FPGAs?

    As if none of that shit is manufactured in asia anyway. Conspirancy to smuggle? More like tax fraud under an heroic excuse.

    1. Re:Microelectronics? by Junior+Samples · · Score: 2, Funny

      His web site says that he specializes in procurement of hard to find and obsolete components. Intel 4004 perhaps?

    2. Re:Microelectronics? by poity · · Score: 1

      Texas Instruments has fabrication facilities in the US (in Texas, no less). They're a major provider of military computer hardware. Their calculators might be made in Asia, but you can bet the chips that the military gets aren't made in Asia.

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
  3. Thank you, moose and squirrel by crazyjj · · Score: 2

    Next time take a page from the Chinese and just convince the target country to manufacture the components in your country in the first place.

    --
    What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    1. Re:Thank you, moose and squirrel by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The problem is that you need to have sufficient manufacturing capability in your country to pull that off first...

  4. re: conspiracy to smuggle advanced microelectronic by dgharmon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is it any news that the Russians 'borrow` a lot of their tech from the west. I understand you could get such 'advanced microelectronics` in a games console. Wasn't it the case, some time ago, that a middle-eastern country was going round buying up games consoles for the chips?

    --
    AccountKiller
  5. Silly Russians by Required+Snark · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Don't they realize that all "US" electronics are made in China? Why are the going through all the trouble to illegally export gear from the US when they can get it directly from the manufacturers in Asia? They are still stuck in a Cold War mind set, where the US is the enemy and Asia is not the major source for technology. They need to stop living in the past.

    Nothing is actually made in the US any more. The big bucks here are in intellectual property and patent litigation: Samsung vs Apple.

    The Chinese are ahead of the curve on this. They know the best way to gain advantage is to use cyber-theft to steal IP. It is very cost effective and produces quick results.

    Unlike export controls, there is no national policy on protecting IP online. Every time someone in the government (Democrats mostly) brings it up business interests scream about government interference, needless regulations and creeping bureaucracy.

    If something is stolen via cyber-theft, their is no legal consequence. Even in the military sector, none of the big defense contractors ever are fined or loose contracts because they leak classified information like a sieve.

    Heck, now with the complete lack of controls on campaign contributions it would be cheap to insure that the current online vulnerabilities remain the norm. All you have to do is give some money to the right elected officials in Congress, and stealing US technology will remain as easy as taking candy from a baby.

    The Russians need to get with the program and copy what the Chinese are already doing. They should be spending more money on PACs, and stop wasting effort on smuggling.

    --
    Why is Snark Required?
    1. Re:Silly Russians by PPH · · Score: 1

      Don't they realize that all "US" electronics are made in China? Why are the going through all the trouble to illegally export gear from the US when they can get it directly from the manufacturers in Asia?

      Better prices.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Silly Russians by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nothing is actually made in the US any more.

      Except Construction equipment, tractors, cars, trains, roads, houses, commercial buildings, food, copper piping and tubing, drugs and other chemicals (ever hear of Monsanto?), concrete... No, we make nothing here.

      Gees, guys, wtf?

    3. Re:Silly Russians by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      Don't they realize that all "US" electronics are made in China?

      [snip]

      The Russians need to get with the program and copy what the Chinese are already doing. They should be spending more money on PACs, and stop wasting effort on smuggling.

      Yes, that is what I'm thinking whenever there is "high tech export" which is becoming a bankrupt statement. What the Russians and Americans should learn from Chinese is how to build things. OK so I'm getting factious.

      Anyway, Happy Sputnik Day everyone.

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    4. Re:Silly Russians by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Nuclear weapons, nuclear powered submarines, nuclear powered aircraft carriers, nuclear powered spacecraft, F16's, F18's, F22's, C17's, B2's, B52s, B1B's, A10's, Tanks, EWACS, Up Armored trucks, Air to ground missiles, Ground to Air missiles. Missile to Missile missiles.

      Do you all get the drift here?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:Silly Russians by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Gees, guys, wtf?

      You must be new here - this is Slashdot, we don't deal in facts.

      That the US manufacturing segment is something like the 11th or 12th largest economy in the world all by itself is utterly irrelevant.

    6. Re:Silly Russians by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      US cars suck. Why would I want to copy those? Construction equipment? The Japanese have better.

    7. Re:Silly Russians by cheesybagel · · Score: 2
      Actually the Russians have more advanced nuclear powered spacecraft than the US. B1B? Sucks compared to a Tu-160 which has twice the speed and twice the payload. C17? Sucks compared with an An-225 Mriya and their Il-76 do the job just fine. B-52s? They are okay but the Russians also have the Tu-95 Bear. I doubt there is anything in the F-16 or F-18 that they don't have already done better. B-2s are good to bankrupt yourself.

      F-22s and F-18 Super Hornet have some interesting technology which they are attempting to compete with the PAK FA.

      Tanks is one area where they have been doing some large improvements over their past models but their doctrine is different since they prefer to have more tanks of lower quality than less more expensive higher quality tanks. They used to have two tank models: a cheaper one for mass production (T-72) and a more expensive one for quality (T-80). However their experience in Chechnya showed the T-80s were not worth the cost since they were just as vulnerable. Russia has a larger land border than the US to defend. They could do better in optics, or gun stabilization, or armor but it would require doing things differently. Missiles? They have S-400 Triumf, the Vympel R-73, R-77, P-800 Oniks, etc. The US has somewhat more advanced air to ground weapons but they also have a fairly diverse catalog they can use.

    8. Re:Silly Russians by Mr+44 · · Score: 1
    9. Re:Silly Russians by Required+Snark · · Score: 1
      When I talk critically about the Russians smuggling and not stealing IP on line I am being sarcastic, that is conveying contempt for both Russia and the USA.

      When i praise the Chinese for their efficient on line spying I am being ironic, saying the opposite of what I really feel.

      When I talk about a lack of Federal policy on protecting US assets from cyber attacks, I am being accurate. There is no enforceable federal policy about protecting infrastructure or intellectual property on line. There are a lot of rules about ITAR and security for military programs, but nothing in the civilian sector.

      When you talk about commercial heavy equipment that has no export controls, you are being obtuse. This shows a lack of intelligence on your part.

      I hope that clears things up for you.

      --
      Why is Snark Required?
  6. Re:Weird by Chrisq · · Score: 2

    Why the middle man - why not smuggle the stuff directly from China?

    Put it this way, would you rather get caught smuggling from the USA or from China? I'm sure neither are pleasant, but I suspect that one is considerably worse than the other.

  7. Re: conspiracy to smuggle advanced microelectronic by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, Iraq supposedly bought 4000+ Playstation 2s to model nuclear detonations, there was at least one slashdot story about it.

    Of course, if you believe what the western press reported about Iraqi weapons programs in that era, I have a very nice bridge and 400 kilos of yellowcake Uranium to sell you...

    --
    0 1 - just my two bits
  8. Gone rogue by CdBee · · Score: 1

    ... Russia, that is, has gone rogue. The whole state is corrupt. This however looks like perfectly normal spying and the sort of thing they have always done, and vice-versa.

    Don't start complaining until they use radiological weapons on your streets, like they did to us...

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  9. Re:That's Not How Export Control Works by crazyjj · · Score: 1

    Duh, you don't need to ship them the schematics. Their hackers have already stolen them. Problem solved!

    --
    What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
  10. Look at the bright side by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    At least he wasn't smuggling it to the Muzzies

    No, Rosoboronexport handled that part.

    Look at the bright side, they might use them against Chechnya, Islam is our common enemy

  11. Re: conspiracy to smuggle advanced microelectronic by CdBee · · Score: 1

    I think that story (using Nintendo chips as missile guidance?) was totally debunked in the end and it was suggested it may have been dreamed up along with the majority of the illegal weapons, to justify a war that was already desired

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  12. Re:Disbelief by ka9dgx · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Example: We used to make rare-earth magnets in Valporaiso, Indiana. The factory was sold and moved to China.

    Without those components, you can't make the high-performance servos necessary to fit into our existing missile designs where they serve to move the control surfaces to steer.

    Conclusion: Thus, if we want to fight a war, we now have to buy parts from China.

    We haven't tested our nukes in ages, we'd forgotten how to make critical parts (fogbank, for example), and they all have a half-life. We import everything. We wouldn't last a year in a world war, and those tend to grind on, in spite of faster transport.

  13. Southwest Houston is a Russian community by concealment · · Score: 2

    Starting in the 1970s, Russian immigrants came to this area in great numbers. They are bordered on the South by a large Hispanic population, on the East by a large East Asian and Indian population, and on the West by rural communities and exburbs.

    1. Re:Southwest Houston is a Russian community by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Grilled beet tacos with plum wine.

  14. Re:Disbelief by jacknifetoaswan · · Score: 1

    We might not manufacture the base components here, but we sure as hell build the final assemblies here. I work for Lockheed Martin, and in my facility, we build the SPY-1 radar arrays that are installed on the US, Japanese, Norwegian, South Korean, and Australian Navy's destroyers, cruisers, and frigates. We might import transistors, chips, whatever, but they're just components. A radar array is much more than just the sum of its parts, and the design knowledge, plus the final manufacture, lives and dies with American workers.

    As for lasting a year in a world war, you're severely mistaken.

  15. Wrong character by wiredog · · Score: 1

    Col. Ripper was the one who was upset about the Commies impurifying our manly juices microchips with fluoride.

    (Side note: HF is actually used in some chip manufacturing.)

  16. Re:Disbelief by poity · · Score: 1

    It doesn't necessarily have to be about obtaining technology for the purpose of "catching up". Even if the US doesn't have technology that is beyond what Russia or China has, it's still useful to those countries to obtain that technology. By studying it, they can find strengths and weaknesses, alter their doctrine to take into account its capabilities, and more intelligently develop countermeasure hardware. It's in the interest of every country to keep these things secret, and it's in the interest of every country to seek these secrets of others.

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
  17. Ho Hum Article by edibobb · · Score: 1

    It's interesting that this article didn't make the front page of latimes.com, washingtonpost.com, or nytimes.com. In 1987, when Toshiba sold milling machines to Russia for submarine propeller manufacture, it was a huge controversy. I believe we are living in a safer world.

    1. Re:Ho Hum Article by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      I believe we are living in a safer world.

      Or just a dumber one.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  18. A/D converters, processors, SRAM, Microcontrollers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    A/D converters, processors, SRAM, Microcontrollers. Basic chinese mass market kit.

    The faulty chips seems to be these ones (from the part number):
    http://www.alldatasheet.com/datasheet-pdf/pdf/81901/AD/ADG819BRT.html

    It's a CMOS single pole, double throw switch. Yes, seriously, takes me back to my childhood! 74LS00's an all.

    Read the indictment:
    http://federalcrimesblog.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/letter-to-the-court-moving-for-a-permanent-order-of-detention.pdf

    Better still read the ACTUAL quotes from the people accused, removing the FBI inuendo:

    Fishenko writes: “in a more presentable format”
    FBI writes:
    "For example, on September 24, 2009, Fishenko engaged in
    an email exchange with an employee of a Russian procurement firm.
    Fishenko requested that the employee get an end user document
    from a Russian factory “in a more presentable format” The next
    day, the employee responded and attached a new end user
    statement, explaining, “This letter is pure forgery. I made it
    using a copy machine.”"

    Fishenko writes: “our person,‘zakinuty kazachok."
    I write: zakinuty kazachok translates as "abandoned cossak", I don't know if it means spy, Google translate doesn't say.
    FBI writes:
    "Fishenko has referenced his ties to Russia’s
    intelligence services. For example, in an October 24, 2011
    conversation with another Russian electronics broker, Fishenko
    and the broker discussed an individual who worked at the broker’s
    firm who, they believed, had been an intelligence officer with
    the FBI. Fishenko stated that the man was “our [type of] person,
    ‘zakinuty kazachok.’” “Zakinuty kazachok” (literally “thrown
    Cossack”) is a Russian colloquialism for “spy” or “secret agent.”

    Posobilov writes: "ake sure that those are fishing boats, and not fishing/anti-submarine ones... Then we’ll be able to start working."
    I write: Russian military have Glosnass GPS, they don't use civilian US GPS that doesn't support GLOSNASS, because civilian US GPS can be degraded at will. So we know for sure this wasn't for military use.
    FBI writes:
    "Posobilov has also made explicit statements that
    demonstrate his intent to evade export laws and defraud
    suppliers. For example, on April 4, 2011, Posobilov exchanged
    emails with a U.S. vendor regarding an order for certain parts.
    Posobilov indicated that the parts were for “fishing boat radar
    equipment” and provided the name and address of a Russian end
    user. The vendor informed Posobilov that the requested parts
    required an export license for Russia and indicated that,
    therefore, the vendor would need a more complete end use
    statement. Posobilov then forwarded this exchange to the Russian
    procurement firm, instructing them to coach the end user to
    complete the end use declaration in such a manner as to
    facilitate obtaining the controlled component. Posobilov wrote,
    “[m]ake sure that those are fishing boats, and not
    fishing/anti-submarine ones... Then we’ll be able to start
    working.”

  19. Re:Disbelief by poity · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The US has a trump card of its own. It's still the breadbasket of the world, and while military war machines depend on manufacturing, so too do soldiers depend on food. Additionally, in a world war it also has two huge oceans and the vast Canadian wilderness protecting it from attack (barring people with nukes going insane, of course). Unless someone can convince Canadians or Mexicans to flip their allegiances, it has the option of going pure offense or pure isolationist. Very few countries can do this.

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
  20. Re: conspiracy to smuggle advanced microelectronic by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    How hard can missile guidance be? The software is tricky, but it doesn't demand a great deal of computing power. You could probably run it on a few PICs, with a skilled coder.

  21. Re:Now there's a fishy Russian surname... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    There's nothing unusual in a Russian or Ukrainian guy with a family name of "Fishenko" - it's not a "Western Germanic/English family name" by any measure. Besides, he was born in Kazakhstan.

  22. So, as a Russian... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

    ... I would like to know if what they stole is actually of use? Or is it some kind of commercial grade stuff that you can buy in Radio Shack anyway, and they just pretended to run some super secret covert ops to ship it over to get funding? (given the level of corruption, this wouldn't be unusual or unprecedented)

    I mean, c'mon, I pay taxes which are used to fund this stuff, and then they squander them on the likes of Anna Chapman.

    1. Re:So, as a Russian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The real waste here is in Russian procurement bureaucracy, which has in this case also revealed US export violations. What, 15 units of MAX1480EAEPI at $25 apiece? You need to publish a government tender openly online for that shit and hold a competition, for every foreign intelligence service to peruse at their leisure? I can order this qty myself online in 5 min from stock at Digi-Key (or a number of other suppliers worldwide) and ask my university for reimbursement, no questions asked.

  23. no inteligence involved by perles · · Score: 1

    "... A Russian foreign ministry spokesman has denied there were any intelligence connections in the affair." To be busted obviously no inteligence was involved.

  24. Re:Disbelief by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    Allegiance? Yeah, I think you need to go to Mexico and ask around about how Mexicans think of America. I have a feeling you'd be shocked at their attitudes. Allegiance! Haha.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  25. Re:Disbelief by tibman · · Score: 1

    Civilian manufacturing maybe. But that's up to business owners to make those decisions, not politicians. Blame business owners. They could build it locally for more (or the same cost with less profit) and support local economies. I'm not trying to offend anyone and of course i'm simplifying it.. but that is how it looks to me.

    --
    http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
  26. Re:Disbelief by Megane · · Score: 1

    Unless someone can convince Canadians or Mexicans to flip their allegiances

    Because Mexico would never turn on us.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  27. Pre-election propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Russia has the capability to make its own microprocessors. I very much doubt that any of this gear was intended for official military uses, and it seems very unlikely that the Russian military would ever allow it.
    I understand that the components of recent Russian radar systems like the NIIP Tikhomorov EASA system (including GaAs Tx/Rx modules), are all domestically manufactured, as is the multi-core VLIW CPU at the heart of its computer system.
    There are a few instances of usage of commercial grade FPGAs in Russian military equipment, like Almaz-Antei missile systems, but nothing exotic that can't be bought from any electronics catalogue.
    This sounds more like pre-election propaganda from the ruling US regime.

  28. Re:Disbelief by poity · · Score: 1

    Oh I'm not ignorant of that little fact. Back in the turn of the century when the US was an emerging power, that may have worked (however unlikely, since Mexico lost its stature as an equal regional power 100 years before that time). And even then, Mexico would have risked everything by doing so. I don't envision Mexico ever becoming hostile to the US before matching it in war-making ability.

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
  29. Re:Disbelief by poity · · Score: 1

    Mexican citizens may be dissatisfied with US drug and immigration policies, but I hardly think invasion is on their minds. The greatest hostility they'll show to Americans is probably to regard them with the same condescension they regard Guatemalans. In any case, allegiances are made by the government, and those decisions are rarely made on a sentiment. Barring Mexico descending into ungovernable chaos, the government is going to act conservatively. Now, you might think the drug cartels would want to undermine the US, but their very existence is dependent on a wealthy and hedonistic US populace, and if anything I would expect them to become a new group of 'Contras' in a WW3 scenario rather than back any militant anti-US movement.

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
  30. Yada yada yada by tlambert · · Score: 1

    But the US can still nuke anyone from the orbit, so the money was not well-spent in the first place.

    People keep saying this, but it never happens; the US keep sending conventional troops places to get shot up instead.

    I say put up or shut up.

  31. Particularly... by tlambert · · Score: 1

    I think that story (using Nintendo chips as missile guidance?) was totally debunked in the end and it was suggested it may have been dreamed up along with the majority of the illegal weapons, to justify a war that was already desired

    Particularly when it is well known that you can defeat missiles using that kind of control system with something as simples as a track ball and three buttons. Here's a picture of the operator console for such a system: http://cdn.chud.com/a/a2/a23bbcb6_11011101.jpeg

  32. Monsanto... aren't they that company from... by tlambert · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Monsanto... aren't they that company from... by tlambert · · Score: 2

      Actually, Dow Chemical owns UCC since 2001 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dow_Chemical_Company#Bhopal_disaster but thank you for the correction, I misremembered the acquisition of UCC, whose subsidiary UCIL ran the Bhopal plant.

      Monsanto, however, is a global company with 21,000 employees in 404 facilities in 66 countries, not a US one; here is a list of worldwide facilities from their web site: http://www.monsanto.com/whoweare/pages/our-locations.aspx

      Likewise, Caterpillar does it's manufacturing close to its customers in various countries: http://www.caterpillar.com/company/global-footprint

      Case tractors are also manufactured outside the US in many instances: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_IH#Factory_locations ; most of the engines used in the US models are manufactured in Brazil.

      General Electric, which manufactures most of the train locomotives used in the US, makes nearly 2/3rds of its money outside the US, and has reduced their US workforce by 1/5 from 2002 to 2011: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/25/business/economy/25tax.html?scp=2&sq=ge&st=cse

      I'll point out that most steel beams used in large construction are manufactured in China and shipped over for use in the US, since the US no longer has the facilities to manufacture them; for example, most of the recent San Francisco Bay Bridge superstructure is from China: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-07-11/sf-bay-bridge-gets-5-300-ton-delivery-from-china.html

      The other stuff is transient local infrastructure (why bring in concrete from another country, unless you are talking pre-stressed concrete girders, which, again, tend to get shipped from China).

      So tell me again how the US is doing?

  33. Re: conspiracy to smuggle advanced microelectronic by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    1988 Iraq, Project Babylon. Objective: to build a supergun and eventually shoot stuff into orbit starting with 'Big Babylon'.

    Basically, it was a wacky idea. So the idea of using 4k PS2s (another wacky idea) shouldn't be scoffed at too. We are talking about Saddam Hussein. He wasn't a level headed kind of guy. He was a dangerous guy with delusions of grandeur. Good riddance.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  34. Re:Weird by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    So which is worse? A lifetime of prison rape in the US or a Chinese bullet to the back of the neck?

    I guess it depends if you're going to end up on the top or the bottom bunk.