Slashdot Mirror
Wanted: Hackers For Large-Scale Attacks On American Banks
Trailrunner7 writes "RSA's FraudAction research team has been monitoring underground chatter and has put together various clues to deduce that a cybercrime gang is actively recruiting up to 100 botmasters to participate in a complicated man-in-the-middle hijacking scam using a variant of the proprietary Gozi Trojan. This is the first time a private cybercrime organization has recruited outsiders to participate in a financially motivated attack, said Mor Ahuvia, cybercrime communications specialist for RSA FraudAction. The attackers are promising their recruits a cut of the profits, and are requiring an initial investment in hardware and training in how to deploy the Gozi Prinimalka Trojan, Ahuvia added. Also, the gang will only share executable files with their partners, and will not give up the Trojan's compilers, keeping the recruits dependent on the gang for updates."
The attackers are promising their recruits a cut of the profits, and are requiring an initial investment in hardware and training
as any confidence man could tell you, the best marks are those that think they are in on the scam...
Won't give up their "compilers" now will they.. Bastards, I'll drop in my version of GCC and show them! Er, ahem, I think the article means "source code." And even with that a determined reverse-engineering effort could negate that too..
Can I apply right now?
Why bother recruiting people if you can just hire bots, or herd your own? Why go for 100 small ones if just a few bigger ones will yield you the same number of victims?
These seem like either very inexperienced criminals, or indeed, as someone else suggested, scammers that want to rip off botnet herders, not banks. You don't involve people in your gang if you don't absolutely need them. You don't train them, unless you absolutely need them to know things. The less people know as little as possible, the smaller the chance you will get caught. Causing a racket by recruiting up to 100 herders does not fit that MO.
I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
I'm trying to remember, who are the bad guys here, the law-breaking, savings-stealing douchebags, or the guys running the botnet?
They should be hacking banks using OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE and tools. (Strokes beard thoughtfully.) The use of proprietary, closed-source tools takes away from the common, computer using felon the ability to maintain his own malicious code.
~ Richard Stallman
May God the merciful grant you peace. You will be surprised to hear from me. I am MRS. HELENA SHOSTAKOVICH, widow of the late DMITRI SHOSTAKOVICH of hacker fame. My dear husband past away two weeks ago, leaving behind 1,500,000 credit card numbers worth THREE HUNDRED MILLIONS US DOLLARS. As I am unable to realize this sum here in Russia, I have been authorized to advance into your bank account FIVE MILLION DOLLARS for assistance in retrieving this funds. The requirement from you, to show you are an honest man of principle and good faith, is an insignificant small purchase of hardware from the following list: ...
To avoid Putin's spies, I have retained agents in NIGERIA who will handle your transactions. Forward your credit card particulars to:
Mr. JOHN MBUTU
POST OFFICE WILL CALL
LAGOS, NIGERIA
#DeleteChrome
these guys must be morons if they think that they can keep 100 people quiet about anything
Timothy Olyphant's character worked that out with his scheme in Die Hard 4.
1) Hire 100 hackers
2) use their code to crack every bank and utility at once
3) kill the hackers.
4) profit!
Killing all his staff did leave him vulnerable to being tracked by Kevin Smith and taken down by a plucky former LAPD cop though.
Throw out a virtual net and pull 'em in. Maybe even pay out some money and recruit repeatedly. It might even attract the attention of the real 'gang'.
It does sound like a hollywood plot. You wouldn't want 100 people giving away the secrets, and it's not necessary when hackers use computers.
There's two sets of crooks involved here, one set are crooks trying to steal stuff, other set are crooks trying to get budget for security theatre. My guess is that this comes from the latter rather than the former.
1. Start "recruiting" people for the diversion A, to keep the RSA's FraudAction research team, the media and (therefore) the government busy with that.
2. Don't tell anyone about the real plan B.
3. Select the best people from the group working on A, and bring them in on plan B.
4. for the profit part: Do plan B before diversion A
5. for the fun part: don't cancel diversion A, just watch it live on the news.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Bullshit: if this were really happening, this guy would not be aware of it.
Also, the gang will only share executable files with their partners, and will not give up the Trojan's compilers, keeping the recruits dependent on the gang for updates
It's a trap! Who's that fucking stupid?
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
Why are they engaging in such theatrics? So far, most banks in the US don't even use two factor authentication (no, it's not a panacea, but it helps, in particular against man in the middle attacks).
on the banking system with the Iranians being blamed for it...
Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
“This Trojan is not well known. This is not SpyEye or Citadel; it’s not available for everyone to buy,” Ahuvia said. “Security vendors and antivirus signatures are less likely to catch it or be familiar with it. It will be tricky for vendors to detect and block it. This gang is keeping a tight hold on the compiler. By only giving up executable files, they can control how any antivirus signatures are in the wild and keep unique signatures to a minimum.” Again seems plausible. OK
Now if they had been using VOIP to compromise the end users cookie I would have been impressed.
The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.