Slashdot Mirror


520-Million-Year-Old Arthropod May Have Had the First Modern Brain

An anonymous reader writes "Scientists say that the recently discovered 520 million year old insect brain, the oldest brain ever discovered in an arthropod, is surprisingly complex for its age, and may be the earliest example on record of a modern brain structure. Hailed as a 'transformative discovery,' researchers said that the 3-inch-long fossilized extinct arthropod found in Yunnan Province, China, shows that insects evolved to have complex brains significantly earlier than previously thought. Researchers said that the fossilized brain, which looks very similar to brains of modern insects, may provide a missing link that offers new insight on the evolutionary history of arthropods, a group of invertebrates that includes insects, spiders and crustaceans."

60 comments

  1. Damn corporate web blocker! by Chrisq · · Score: 0

    Access has been blocked because of:
    Tru-View has categorised this page as Drugs

    1. Re:Damn corporate web blocker! by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Funny

      Access has been blocked because of: Tru-View has categorised this page as Drugs

      Mind you the funniest one I have come across was a page about "sharp calculators classed as weapons. Well I suppose a (literally) sharp calculator could be!

    2. Re:Damn corporate web blocker! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Informative

      You didnt miss much. Just some conclusions about the evolution of insects:

      They explained that up until now, research on insects has been divided into two camps. While some researchers believe that insects evolved from the same ancestor that gave rise to malacostracans, a group of crustaceans that include crabs and shrimp, the majority of scientists believe that they were derived from a group of crustaceans called branchiopods, a species that includes include brine shrimp, which have a simpler brain anatomy than malacostracans.

      However, researchers from the latest study say that the new finding shows that insects did in fact evolve from creatures that already possessed complex brains.
      Read more at http://www.medicaldaily.com/articles/12631/20121010/520-million-year-old-bug-creature-first.htm#hclmrDOPXj8WW6PR.99

    3. Re:Damn corporate web blocker! by retroworks · · Score: 0

      This is the opening line from another article on the same page, which is actually more interesting than the insect-brain article. Of course now that I've posted it here, your corporate web blocker may seal off Slashdot... " Performing oral sex or having sex without a condom may benefit both mental and physical health in women, according to scientists who analyzed the effects of semen's "mood-altering chemicals."

      --
      Gently reply
    4. Re:Damn corporate web blocker! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Access has been blocked because of: Tru-View has categorised this page as Drugs

      Whoever wrote Tru-View was so high they thought arthropods were a kind of marijuana.

    5. Re:Damn corporate web blocker! by azalin · · Score: 2

      The feather (or pen) is mightier than the sword, so calculators (especially sharp ones) should be considered dangerous.
      On the other hand I'm have some trouble with the exact level of dangerousness. If pen beats sword (and thereby knife and dagger), what would a pocket calculator beat?

    6. Re:Damn corporate web blocker! by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 2, Funny

      You didnt miss much. Just some conclusions about the evolution of insects:

      I could have got that watching the conservative party conference

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    7. Re:Damn corporate web blocker! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If pen beats sword (and thereby knife and dagger), what would a pocket calculator beat?

      Barack Obama at calculating the deficit?

    8. Re:Damn corporate web blocker! by Rufty · · Score: 2

      While a sharp calculator may have a certain level of dangerousness, to really cause damage you need a spreadsheet.

      --
      Red to red, black to black. Switch it on, but stand well back.
    9. Re:Damn corporate web blocker! by azalin · · Score: 1

      You didnt miss much. Just some conclusions about the evolution of insects:

      What is this evolution you talk of, and how can this insect be 520 million years old, if earth is only 6000 years old?
      I still don't know whether to laugh or cry, when I hear people try to proclaim creationism as science. Otoh trying to get it into the classroom pisses me of for sure.

    10. Re:Damn corporate web blocker! by azalin · · Score: 2

      Nice one... Still the question of what weapon a calculator would beat remains unanswered. A pointy stick, a knife, assault rifle, sarin gas or an icbm? The whole issue is rather tricky. In close combat a pocket calculator is rather worthless, even if thrown in a slingshot. If it is used to calculate ballistic flight paths for artillery things change...

    11. Re:Damn corporate web blocker! by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      Performing oral sex or having sex without a condom may benefit both mental and physical health in women, according to scientists who analyzed the effects of semen's "mood-altering chemicals."

      Citation needed on that.

      Desperately!

    12. Re:Damn corporate web blocker! by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      If pen beats sword (and thereby knife and dagger), what would a pocket calculator beat?

      Barack Obama at calculating the deficit?

      Congress at creating a budget.

    13. Re:Damn corporate web blocker! by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

      You didnt miss much. Just some conclusions about the evolution of insects:

      What is this evolution you talk of, and how can this insect be 520 million years old, if earth is only 6000 years old?

      I still don't know whether to laugh or cry, when I hear people try to proclaim creationism as science. Otoh trying to get it into the classroom pisses me of for sure.

      Don't be absurd. Evolution is a Lie from Hell. I have that straight from the congressional panel on Science and Technology.

    14. Re:Damn corporate web blocker! by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      When in actuality, it should have been categorized as Bugs...

    15. Re:Damn corporate web blocker! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      While a sharp calculator may have a certain level of dangerousness, to really cause damage you need a spreadsheet.

      Spreadsheets are truly the weapons of math destruction.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    16. Re:Damn corporate web blocker! by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      "Performing oral sex or having sex without a condom may benefit both mental and physical health in women, according to scientists who analyzed the effects of semen's "mood-altering chemicals."

      Citation needed on that.

      Desperately!

      I can't speak to the accuracy of the claims, but here. Pretty much verbatim.

      Anecdotally, I know what being on the receiving end does for my mood though. ;-)

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    17. Re:Damn corporate web blocker! by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that, nice to know. If I ever get out of my mom's basement and get a 'real' girl, I need to make sure she reads this. "There's your proof right there on the internet, honey, so it's really true! Now..." :-)

  2. offensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Frankly I find the idea of a bug that thinks offensive.

    1. Re:offensive by Walterk · · Score: 3, Informative

      Note to mods: the above is a reference to famous sci-fi Starship Troopers.

      Would you like to know more?

    2. Re:offensive by azalin · · Score: 1

      "If it's got more than two legs, shoot it!" (or something along this line, it's been to long)

    3. Re:offensive by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      "Come on, you apes! You wanna live forever!?"

      I think the quote from the book is slightly different:

      "Move it, Apes! Do you want to live forever?"

      Would you like to know more?

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    4. Re:offensive by wolverine2k · · Score: 1

      Well, now we can legally call someone bug head or insect head...

    5. Re:offensive by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3, Funny

      Frankly I find the idea of a bug that thinks offensive.

      You have not seen the AI code in development. Sometimes the code becomes sentient prematurely and the bugs think they are features.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    6. Re:offensive by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      I really would love it if they remade that movie to actually include powered armor.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    7. Re:offensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That armor has some interesting credits.
      I believe I read that they re-used it in Firefly for the military...

    8. Re:offensive by rossdee · · Score: 2

      I am sure that Robert Anson Heinlein tirns over in his grave whenever anyone mentions that crappy movie.
      He would like to be remembered for the book though.

    9. Re:offensive by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Also an Asimov short story with aliens that breathe chlorine and look like giant houseflys, titled C-Chute. Unfortunately, the linked wiki article doesn't mention their looking like insects.

    10. Re:offensive by Zaphod-AVA · · Score: 2

      Not entirely fair. It's certainly a terrible attempt at a Starship Troopers movie, however when I mentally rename it to "Bugs From Space" and ignore the sound of Heinlein spinning in his grave, it becomes a lot more enjoyable. The effects are decent, it has a good sense of humor, a lovely redhead, and Neil Patrick Harris

    11. Re:offensive by Genda · · Score: 1

      I find Heinleins spinning in his grave, gives the movie soundtrack an edgy whine that makes it more suspenseful. I would actually change the name of the movie to "RRRRAAAAIIIDDDD!!!"

    12. Re:offensive by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure sure. It did the RIGHT thing in that it didn't slavishly follow the book--most movies that do fail because books aren't the same as movies, so doing a 1-to-1 translation doesn't really work.

      Heinlein also had certain political views that he trotted out in his books: citizenship through service, government control, propaganda, etc. The Starship Troopers movie actually does a really good job of a lot of that. Despite the big explosions and (sometimes) goofy dialogue and meaningless romance/sex scenes, the political undercurrent of the stories is still there. The movie has real political messages, if you're willing to look at them and not spend all the time watching the movie lamenting that it's not the same as the original.

      I think RAH would have liked it. :)

  3. And the Scarecrow said by oDDmON+oUT · · Score: 2

    "Finally".

    --
    Some days it's just not worth
    chewing through my restraints.
    1. Re:And the Scarecrow said by should_be_linear · · Score: 1

      It said "First Post!"

      --
      839*929
  4. And in China.... by busyqth · · Score: 1

    You know for sure that the first thought through the minds of Chinese researchers upon finding this fossilized bug: "What does it taste like?"
    I mean, that was pretty much my first thought.. well, right after "what's the best way to cook it?"

    1. Re:And in China.... by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      The fossilized arthropod probably tastes like fossilized chicken.

  5. We came to find you by slashdime · · Score: 1

    Over half a billion years. As far as we know, it's only been 13.75 billion years since (the|this most recent) big bang. That's 3.636% (repeating of course) of the age of the universe we've spent evolving our minds. And now we cast our gaze back over half a billion years in wonder.

    1. Re:We came to find you by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      still... nearly half the bug's DNA should still be viable ;)

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    2. Re:We came to find you by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      my bad - misread the first article, what I should have said was:

      still... nearly 0.5^998080 fraction of the DNA should still be viable.

      I think it lost the giggle factor second time round...

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  6. Damn by nospam007 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Reading this from the couch on the TV with large fonts, I read the title as:

    520-Million-Year-Old Arthropod May Have Had the First Modem!

    and I thought, damn, news for nerds, finally!

    1. Re:Damn by Genda · · Score: 1

      And you never heard crickets downloading Katydid porn on a warm summer night?

      Slash-dotters lead such sheltered lives...

  7. Holy dilemma, batman! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    But if it wasn't sharp it'd infringe Apple's patents.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  8. Uhhhhhh by Giant+Electronic+Bra · · Score: 3, Interesting

    520 million years, or a good ways into the Atdabanian Stage. At that point trilobites have been around for at least 6 million years already. Surely they had fairly sophisticated arthropod brains. I dunno, this seems a little late, the primary radiation in Euarthropoda almost certainly came before this guy lived. In any case the systematics of arthropods are a mess.

    --
    "Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem." -- Jefferson
  9. She's gonna be disappointed by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

    My daughter thinks SHE has the first modern brain.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:She's gonna be disappointed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just how did you ever convince a female to mate with you, anyway?

      You're a total grump.

    2. Re:She's gonna be disappointed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey PopeRatzo- whatever else you say about your daughter, at least she reads Slashdot!

    3. Re:She's gonna be disappointed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My daughter thinks SHE has the first modern brain.

      80% of the posters on slashdot seem to think that as well.

  10. Evidence against evolution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So after 520 million years, insect 'brains' haven't really evolved at all? What could that mean?

    1. Re:Evidence against evolution? by NEDHead · · Score: 1

      They are the backbone of the Republican Party! (insert comments about lack of spine, segmented bodies, etc. here)

    2. Re:Evidence against evolution? by rossdee · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you add up all the intelligence of all the Republicans on the House science committee it would still be less than one of those bugs.

  11. Re:Bet it could out-debate Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's incredibly old and has a relatively primitive brain- sounds like a typical Romney supporter. During the debate, will it also get to make up its own facts?

  12. Who knew... by bodland · · Score: 1

    Paul Ryan was that old....

    1. Re:Who knew... by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Paul Ryan isn't that old. John McCain, Mitch McConnell, and Joe Lieberman, on the other hand ...

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  13. What I'd like to know is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where was the air cover, the artillery, the AFVs; even arming the troopers with RPGs would have been more effective. And no one in charge seemed to have even an elementary appreciation of battlefield tactics. I suppose the real subtext was that the war with the bugs was just a way of thinning out the surplus human population.

    But it was fun watching everyone getting chewed up by the Red Menace... Oops! I meant the bugs........

  14. Wait a minute... by musixman · · Score: 2

    You mean the earth wasn't created 6,000 years ago?

    1. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who says these guys are right? Funny how everyone loves to assume a lot and call it fact. Hum....

      LOL, my captcha turn out to be "Presume". ROFL

  15. He may have had the first modern Brain, but . . . by DickBreath · · Score: 1

    He did not have the first modern birth control and must have coupled with someone of the opposite gender.

    And here we are today with imaginary "Intellectual Property".

    Oh, look, Joe found a better, faster way to make fire! Too bad the rest of us aren't allowed to do that.

    Oh, look, Bill found that a spear works better than a club for killing prey! Too bad the rest of us can't do that.

    Oh, look, John found that using round wheels work better than rectangles with rounded corners! Too bad the rest of us can't use that idea.

    Oh, look! ! ! Ted found a way of having sex that looks like a lot more fun. Too bad . . .

    Etc, etc.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  16. modern brain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    modern? 520 million years ago? i dont think that word means what you think it means