Slashdot Mirror


Black Hole's "Point of No Return" Found

dsinc writes "Using a continent-spanning telescope, an international team of astronomers has peered to the edge of a black hole at the center of a distant galaxy. For the first time, they have measured the black hole's 'point of no return' — the closest distance that matter can approach before being irretrievably pulled into the black hole. According to Einstein's theory of general relativity, a black hole's mass and spin determine how close material can orbit before becoming unstable and falling in toward the event horizon. The team was able to measure this innermost stable orbit and found that it's only 5.5 times the size of the black hole's event horizon. This size suggests that the accretion disk is spinning in the same direction as the black hole. The observations were made by linking together radio telescopes in Hawaii, Arizona, and California to create a virtual telescope called the Event Horizon Telescope, or EHT. The EHT is capable of seeing details 2,000 times finer than the Hubble Space Telescope."

7 of 130 comments (clear)

  1. Editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    What in the name of everything you hold holy were you thinking when posting this?

    Sure, the news is interesting, but while we're getting used to spelling errors and broken links on the front page, a blatantly mis-formatted link is something new, I think.

    1. Re:Editors by Rhinobird · · Score: 5, Funny

      What in the name of everything you hold holy were you thinking when posting this?

      I think you meant to say:

      What in 'http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2012/10/the-name-of-everything-you-hold-holy-were-you-thinking/the name of everything you hold holy' were you thinking when posting this?

      --
      If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
  2. That link cleaned up by madcarrots · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    "Knock the stones together, guys!"
  3. Re:I thought they were both the same. by madcarrots · · Score: 5, Informative

    as i understand it, the Event Horizon is the singularity limit from which light cannot escape. the Innermost Stable Orbit is the closest distance a physical object in space can orbit the black hole without being sucked into it.

    --
    "Knock the stones together, guys!"
  4. Re:Unstable? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anyone versed in GTR here to help?

    When the heart rules the mind
    One look and love is blind
    When you want the dream to last
    Take a chance forget the past

    Seasons will change
    You must move on
    Follow your dream

  5. Re:I thought they were both the same. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nonsense. Light can fall into a stable orbit too! And light, because it's moving, has mass too.

    Maybe you meant matter, when talking about the stable orbit.

    Ugh. No. Photons have no mass. They have momentum. Relativistic mass isn't actually mass, and in fact, physicists have been trying to get rid of the term, because of the confusion it causes.

    Point of no return = distance below which no stable orbit can exist. If you have thrust, you can actually get out of the "point of no return", it's further away than the event horizon. You just can't have an unpowered orbit that won't eventually decay into the event horizon.

  6. Re:Unstable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Comment posting limits (and time...) won't let me respond to many individual comments, so I will see if I can address a few things at the same time here.

    For a given angular momentum of something going around a black hole, you can work out what potential energy it would have at different radii. In a normal Newtonian case, you can think of having some satellite orbiting at some speed. If you try to push that satellite further in, while still maintaining its angular speed, it will try to pop back out since it is essentially going too fast to orbit at a smaller radius. There is a minimum in the potential energy of the satellite where it would have a circular orbit for that given angular momentum, as it would just stay at that radius. The potential energy about this radius would be like a bowl, if you push the satellite inward, it would roll back down toward the radius corresponding to a circular orbit. Momentum would of course carry it beyond that point, so it would oscillate in radius between some place closer and some place further from the circular orbit. This would give you an elliptical orbit where the radius goes between two values. The potential energy for over radius for a given angular momentum would look roughly like the red curve in the image here.

    Now, for a black hole, GR gives some differences from Newtonian gravity when you get closer. The potential energy curve now looks more like this. There is still a stable orbit, as you can see it could oscillate around the minimum there like a marble in a bowl. In other words, small pushes on a perfectly circular orbit will turn it into a slightly elliptical orbit that is still pretty close to the circular one. However, if you push it far enough inward to get over that bump, the orbital radius would be like a marble just rolling down that hill toward the black hole. Now, the size of that bump changes depending on what angular momentum you are talking about. As you increase the angular momentum, which in Newtonian gravity would just give you a smaller radius for a circular orbit, that bump gets smaller. There is a point where the bump goes away, such that you just now have a curve that decreases with decreasing radius. Hence, a particle in such an orbit would continue to move closer to the black hole, as there is lower potential energy the closer it gets.

    This is all due to the geometry of space around a black hole. Weird stuff like the circumference of a circle not being 2 pi r depending on how you measure the r from the black hole, which is why orbits no longer have the same stability they have in Newtonian gravity. This is not an effect due to gravitational waves. The orbiting particle can be something like a proton where the gravitational waves would be too small to matter. However, if you are talking about the orbit of a massive object, like a star or second black hole, then the gravitational waves become significant. In that case, the orbit at any radius would slowly decay due to emitting gravitational waves. Once the decay orbit hits the radius of the innermost stable orbit, the decay would greatly accelerate.

    This is also not an effect of rotation or frame dragging, as it happens with a non-spinning black hole solution too. However, spinning black holes and frame dragging do factor into it, such that for a spinning black hole, the inner most stable orbit is smaller if you are going in the right direction around the black hole. Although there are other effects that the frame dragging causes. You get things like the ergosphere, a region where due to frame dragging, you would have to go faster than light to look stationary from an outside viewer, so all matter within that region is spinning around the black hole.

    This is also quite distinct from the event horizo