Slashdot Mirror


Millions of Blogs Knocked Offline By Legal Row

another random user writes with this excerpt from the BBC: "A row over a web article posted five years ago has led to 1.5 million educational blogs going offline. The Edublogs site went dark for about an hour after its hosting company, ServerBeach, pulled the plug. The hosting firm was responding to a copyright claim from publisher Pearson, which said one blog had been illegally sharing information it owned. ... The offending article was first published in November 2007 and made available a copy of a questionnaire, known as the Beck Hopelessness Scale, to a group of students. The copyright for the questionnaire is owned by Pearson, which asked ServerBeach to remove the content in late September."

7 of 162 comments (clear)

  1. It's actually worse than stated... by BMOC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The offending post was published in 2007, which is true, however the material (questionnaire) that was posted was 38 years old. Worse yet, the questionnaire was a suicide prevention questionnaire, so its existence in the public domain might actually save lives. So a DMCA request pulled down millions of blogs because one page that was originally published nearly 4 decades ago supposedly has some copyright value to someone. These times we live in, they're literally not far off from a lot of books I was encouraged to read in high school, but was told would never actually happen.

    --
    I swear they give me mod points to shut me up.
    1. Re:It's actually worse than stated... by BMOC · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was trying to be vague to avoid any possible DMCA takedown notice, now see what you've done...

      --
      I swear they give me mod points to shut me up.
    2. Re:It's actually worse than stated... by chalkyj · · Score: 5, Funny

      What sort of world would we be living in if you couldn't make a big fat profit out of suicide prevention? Certainly not a world I'd want to live in...

  2. Re:A good reason to host your own blog by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If I were serious about blogging then I'd host my own. I wonder why more people don't?

    1. You need an Internet connection that is suitable for hosting your blog (static or rarely changing IP address, decent upload throughput, nothing in the contract that forbids hosting a webserver, etc.).
    2. You need a computer that you can leave on all the time.
    3. You need the technical expertise needed to install and configure a blogging system (and by extension, a web server and database server).

    For us on Slashdot, the only problem is with the first one, and even then, most of us probably know a place that will let us run a server for our blog. For most people, the combination of those three is a daunting task, and so they just pay some hosting company somewhere to take care of it for them.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  3. moral of the story by jest3r · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Unfortunately, in early October automated systems at ServerBeach spotted a copy of the disputed blog entry stored in the working memory of software Edublogs uses to make sure web pages are displayed quickly. The copy of the blog entry was in this memory store - only visible internally"

    So Server Beach has an automated system that detected copyright infringement in a "cache" file and automatically shut down the server before checking to see if it was actually visible to the public (which according to the article it was not)?

    Moral of the story ... stop using Server Beach I guess.

    This is scary for Server Beach customers because any copyrighted material could end up on disk (ie. if someone submits a form that writes to disk or into a database. Then the Server Beach script will nuke your site no questions asked!!!

  4. The original paper by clickety6 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The original paper is available in a number of places - just search for PCA1clinical2011.pdf - and contains the original questions. Not sure how Pearson gets to claim copyright over something that was published in The Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology based on research probably conducted with public money (Univ. of PA, PA General HGopsital, Camden County Community Mental Health Program)

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
  5. Re:No, Actually It's Exactly How It Was Stated by causality · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And yeah, that might be the future with self publishing on the rise but right now they have those texts under laws that are legitimate US Laws.

    If by "legitimate" you mean:

    • Terribly unbalanced against the public domain
    • Pushed upon us with no connection to the will/demand of the people
    • By a tiny minority of monied interests who long ago usurped the political processes of this constitutional republic
    • Written and voted for by legislators who are not representing their constituents because they've been bought and paid for

    ... then yes, it is perfectly legitimate.

    --
    It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein