Slashdot Mirror


UK Gov't Official Advises Using Fake Details On Social Networks

another random user writes "A senior government official has sparked anger by advising internet users to give fake details to websites to protect their security. Andy Smith, an internet security chief at the Cabinet Office, said people should only give accurate details to trusted sites such as government ones. He said names and addresses posted on social networking sites 'can be used against you' by criminals. ... 'When you put information on the internet do not use your real name, your real date of birth,' he told a Parliament and the Internet Conference in Portcullis House, Westminster. 'When you are putting information on social networking sites don't put real combinations of information, because it can be used against you.' But he stressed that internet users should always give accurate information when they were filling in government forms on the internet, such a tax returns."

10 of 175 comments (clear)

  1. Sure, great for the UK by crazyjj · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What about in the U.S., where the corporations ARE the government?

    --
    What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
  2. Sadly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The social networks are getting smarter, and even if you don't give them the information, they may already have it. Unless you're doing this and not associating with anyone who knows you in real life, they will be able to match you up to your real self.

    1. Re:Sadly by ciderbrew · · Score: 5, Informative

      That right. FB didn't have my really birthday until others entered it into their calendar. I still get emails from friends asking me if I've moved? Well maybe I want to be a 48 year old women from Kenya! No website get real info. All websites get misspelt something in the name or address to track how that data is moved about. Sadly I "need" to use FB to organise and keep up with other people. I'd rather in not be on FB; but I can't stop the 300 people I network with from using it.

  3. awesome, advocate violating the terms of service by Nadaka · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And that is a considered a felony hacking crime in some countries.

  4. He's wrong by e065c8515d206cb0e190 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You shouldn't (always) trust the government either.

    1. Re:He's wrong by godrik · · Score: 4, Funny

      maybe, but lying on tax forms is typically a very bad idea!

  5. The real story... by Xest · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The other story here is that in response some whiny bitch of a Labour MP said she was shocked that a government worker would dare make a suggestion that we try and protect our privacy and anonymity because anyone doing so is obviously a cyber bully and has something to hide.

    Which reminds me once again why I don't know if it's worth even voting next election because it's a choice between spoilt milionaires who were born with a silver spoon yet still want more and seem to spend more time legislating about what furry animals they can kill next rather than doing much of actual value, and fascists that want to control every aspect of our lives and pay us enough benefits to bankrupt the country if we can't be arsed to work.

    Honestly, for once a government official speaks sense, and still it gets turned into party political bollocks trying to take a swipe at them over it.

    This guy, whoever he is, for PM. He's made the most sense of any government worker I've ever seen.

  6. Steam Users by baoru · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Someone should tell the 27 million Steam users born on January 1st that they should not use their real birthdays.

  7. Re:awesome, advocate violating the terms of servic by Nadaka · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/09/aaron-swartz-felony/all/

    "The government, however, has interpreted the anti-hacking provisions to include activities such as violating a website’s terms of service or a company’s computer usage policy, a position a federal appeals court in April said means “millions of unsuspecting individuals would find that they are engaging in criminal conduct.”"

  8. Re:awesome, advocate violating the terms of servic by Nadaka · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1030