Slashdot Mirror


How Do You Eat a Triceratops? Start By Ripping the Head Off

scibri writes "Once a Tyrannosaurus took down a Triceratops, how did it go about eating it? By looking at the bite marks on Triceratops fossils, a group of paleontologists have pieced together the steps, and created an illustrated guide. Step one? Pull off the head."

113 comments

  1. Sounds like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds like an afternoon on bath salts.

    1. Re:Sounds like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sounds like my ex-wife's Modus operandi

    2. Re:Sounds like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worst part is when you wake up and realize it's the wife's pooch. Ricky, you got some splainin' to do.

    3. Re:Sounds like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny

  2. MMMM !! BRAINS !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MMMmh ughgh oooo eees szzze !!

  3. Ah Yes! Triceratops ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... the "gummy bear" of dinosaurs.

  4. First shoot it with a .458 magnum - several times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First shoot it with a .458 magnum several times (An elephant gun to those who don't know calibers and it's has MUCH more of a punch than a .50 caliber. A 20mm cannon would be better, but I have yet to see a rifle for that.), start a bonfire (you're NOT going to butcher the beast! IT's too big), and then when it's done, take a machete and hack off chunks.

  5. Step 4 by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 4, Funny

    Step four: feast on the delicacies beneath the frill.

    I am so making a T-shirt with these pictures and captions.

    --
    Time to offend someone
    1. Re:Step 4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i was expecting a '???' step.

    2. Re:Step 4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'll see you in court sir.

    3. Re:Step 4 by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      They're probably copyrighted, and you'd probably get sued.

      But, yes, that would be an awesome T-shirt ... probably pretty popular among the paleontologists.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:Step 4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alternative shirt has Barney and Barney's triceratops friend

    5. Re:Step 4 by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      They forgot step 5, "profit".

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    6. Re:Step 4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was leaning more towards "Step three: nibble on the soft flesh of Triceratops' face."

    7. Re:Step 4 by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      If I go onto a place like zazzle and have a one off one made up that is not put up for sale I don't think there will be a problem. If I decided that I wanted to sell copies using their images and captions then it would be a problem.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    8. Re:Step 4 by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Just saying, the other dinosaurs are always all over stuff like that. ;-)

      I think it would be an awesome t-shirt though, maybe the original authors would agree to using the images.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    9. Re:Step 4 by avgjoe62 · · Score: 2

      I REALLY did not want the image of Barney eating Baby Bop planted in my head. I already suspected that purple monstrosity was perverted - this will just make me cringe even more every time I hear that sodding theme song...

      --

      How come Slashdot never gets Slashdotted?

    10. Re:Step 4 by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      If I could get permission to use the images and captions I would pursue selling them as it seems a lot of people have a dark sense of humor much like mine and they probably would do fairly well.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    11. Re:Step 4 by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      They're probably copyrighted, and you'd probably get sued.

      But, yes, that would be an awesome T-shirt ... probably pretty popular among the paleontologists.

      They'll send around their lawyers, indistinguisable from T. Rex, which will rip your head off.

      Really wondering if this was the case or the bite marks were the result of battle. Once you, as T. Rex, got around those horns and had a good grip, would you risk letting go? Seems more to me like T. Rex would have bull-dogged a Triceratops, attempt to break its neck or get it in a position of asphyxiation, unable to breath through a twisted windpipe.

      But I'm just a software developer, what do I know.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    12. Re:Step 4 by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      Good luck getting them to print it...about two years ago I was trying to have shirts printed for a university club and I couldn't find a printer that would let us include the name of the university due to copyright fears. If they can find your image on Google, they're not gonna print it.

    13. Re:Step 4 by Zordak · · Score: 1

      Pedantic and all, but the name of your university is not copyrighted. It's too minimal. But there may be trademark issues.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    14. Re:Step 4 by ackthpt · · Score: 2

      I was leaning more towards "Step three: nibble on the soft flesh of Triceratops' face."

      Step 5: T. Rex throws the carcass on a grill, pulls out a few brews and throws a BBQ party.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    15. Re:Step 4 by RivenAleem · · Score: 2

      Step 5 polish the skull and mount it on your spaceship wall.

    16. Re:Step 4 by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Good luck getting them to print it

      So print it yourself! A silkscreen is easy to construct. Anybody can print their own shirts.

    17. Re:Step 4 by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1
      FTFA:

      they noted something important: none of the bones showed any signs of healing, indicating that the bites were inflicted on dead animals that were in the process of being eaten.

    18. Re:Step 4 by camperdave · · Score: 1

      So print it yourself! A silkscreen is easy to construct. Anybody can print their own shirts.

      Oh this is so not true. You need wood to build a frame, and tools to cut the wood. Then you need "silk", but is it real silk, or a special kind of silk? Are there different thread counts? Which one do you need? I know, buy several and try them out. You'll need a staple gun or something to attach the silk to the frame. Next you'll need to some how print the images onto the silk. Is there a photographic process for that? Need the chemicals, oh and a digital projector. That will need to be done in a dark, well ventilated room. I hope you have one of those. Next, the paint. It will have to be some sort of washable fabric dye. Does the color you want exist? Do you have to blend them to get the right color. Fortunately these are monochrome pictures. If they had been color, then you'd want to do some sort of color separation. That would mean halftone-ing the image, and producing several silkscreen frames. Now you'll need some sort of squeegee. You'll also need some sort of smooth board you can put inside the tee-shirt so that you don't squeegee the image right through both the front and the back.

      It would be far, far easier, and far, far cheaper to use those ink jet iron-on kits.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    19. Re:Step 4 by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I've built silkscreens. No, you don't need real silk, a nylon scarf will do. If you're going from a photo you can cut the photo to lay out your pattern. Wikipedia probably has enough info for anyone to be able to make one; they're easy. It's not like building an Atlas rocket or anything, silkscreening is ancient and low-tech.

  6. Read the article! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Step one: get a good grip on the neck frill.

    Geez, come on.

  7. Which end of a hot dog do you bite first? by mmell · · Score: 1

    The end that's closer to your mouth!

    1. Re:Which end of a hot dog do you bite first? by ackthpt · · Score: 2

      The end that's closer to your mouth!

      Most predators I've seen go for the soft tissues, first. Liver, stomach, intestines, etc., muscle tissue usually eaten after it has "seasoned" a few days.

      As they are looking at fossils I'm wondering how they are determining the order in which feeding took place. Perhaps T. Rex hung around such a large kill for days, feeding until it was sated or felt like getting something fresh.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  8. Suck the head ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pinch the tail ...

    Just like crawdads!

  9. One question by AwesomeMcgee · · Score: 1

    After tearing the head off, how much salt did the tyrannosaurus use to make it edible?

  10. The Oatmeal is slacking by boristdog · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Oatmeal should have been all over this guide like...well, like a T-rex on a Triceratops.

    1. Re:The Oatmeal is slacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Qwantz has it covered!. ..OK. it is unrelated. but my god that domain name in the strip makes me laugh.

    2. Re:The Oatmeal is slacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Oatmeal should have been all over this guide like...well, like a T-rex on a Triceratops.

      You think that'd stop Innis from stealing a perfectly good joke? You've got another thing coming, friend. That exact diagram (perhaps redrawn) will either be his next comic, or he'll wait a month until it's not on the forefront of everyone's minds and do it. Make sure you get ready to share it to all your friends!

    3. Re:The Oatmeal is slacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't call what the Oatmeal does 'drawing'.

  11. Taking down a triceratops? by camperdave · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Once a Tyrannosaurus took down a Triceratops, how did it go about eating it?"

    I thought T-Rex was downgraded from a hunter/killer to a carcass plundering carrion eater, like a buzzard. Besides, didn't these Triceratopses have soft underbellies and such? Seems to me that the neck and face bits would be the LAST to go, not the first.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Taking down a triceratops? by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 1

      The soft underbellies were mostly organs and guts -- nutritious but not meaty. The meatiest parts of the triceratops were the huge neck muscles.

      It's not clear whether the T-Rex killed the triceratops himself, or found and ate already dead carcasses. But either way, the scientists have concluded from bite marks that this is how the feasting went.

      --
      Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    2. Re:Taking down a triceratops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe after getting to a Triceratops and scaring away whatever was eating it, this was a way to get at 'still good' parts that weren't accessible to smaller dinosaurs yet...

    3. Re:Taking down a triceratops? by Schmorgluck · · Score: 1

      I thought T-Rex was downgraded from a hunter/killer to a carcass plundering carrion eater, like a buzzard.

      Yeah, heard of that too. Something about their body structure being inappropriate for actual fighting. Their wee upper limbs, in particular.

      --
      There's nothing like $HOME
    4. Re:Taking down a triceratops? by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily, I think the pendulum has swung the other way again, more recently.. at least, some.
      And there's this, about their bite force, which suggests (but doesn't prove) predation:
      http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v382/n6593/abs/382706a0.html

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    5. Re:Taking down a triceratops? by lgw · · Score: 1

      This has been debated by experts for over a century now. It's hard to get solid evidence about habits. The teeth of the T-Rex were strong enough to wrestle down live prey (to judge from bite strength, whihc can be determined from bite marks). Its seems likely it could run faster than its prey (to judge form biomechanics, but that doesn't speak to metabolism). T-rex certainly seems able to be a predator, whatever you want to read into that.

      I just assume they were like modern lions: not shy about taking cariron, but willing and able to make thier own when the opportunity arose.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    6. Re:Taking down a triceratops? by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 1

      I've always seen predators and scavengers start on the organy undersides. That's where most of the fats are, and also the parts that will rot the quickest. Seems like dinosaurs would need similar nutrition requirements to todays buzzards?

    7. Re:Taking down a triceratops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Once a Tyrannosaurus took down a Triceratops, how did it go about eating it?"

      I thought T-Rex was downgraded from a hunter/killer to a carcass plundering carrion eater, like a buzzard. Besides, didn't these Triceratopses have soft underbellies and such? Seems to me that the neck and face bits would be the LAST to go, not the first.

      The article specifically says the bite marks in the triceratops frills weren't healed, which to me implies that healed bite marks have been found on triceratops fossils. If you Google tyrannosaur healed bite marks you get a good number of hits with references to specific instances of herbivore fossils with healed tyrannosaur bite marks.

      Figures - like a dog, T. Rex probably ate whatever he could.

    8. Re:Taking down a triceratops? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Ah, but if the jaws are big enough then it doesn't need the arms (and there's some evidence that the jaws were powerful and teeth strong enough to be used for killing large prey). And one theory for why the arms are so small is to allow for such big jaws while staying balanced.

      Of course a predator as big as T-Rex would have still eaten carrion -- or just stole fresh kills from other, smaller predators since that's one of the advantages of being big. Like their modern cousins, the eagles.

      On a somewhat tangential note, those wee arms were a lot stronger than you might think. Tendon attachment marks on fossils suggest that T-Rex arms were extremely strong. One theory is that it used the arms to help it get upright, basically letting it do a small push-up to help get its weight under it.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    9. Re:Taking down a triceratops? by onyxruby · · Score: 1

      That's the wonderful thing about science. It takes 'thought' and turns it upside down. Besides who are we puny humans to argue with a T-rex?

    10. Re:Taking down a triceratops? by Chuckstar · · Score: 4, Informative

      I thought T-Rex was downgraded from a hunter/killer to a carcass plundering carrion eater, like a buzzard.

      There's still debate on this subject, but IMHO there's really too much evidence to the contrary to believe that T.Rex was a scavenger specialist (although pretty much all predators will eat carrion when available). The most interesting evidence are fossil bones of T.Rex prey that have partially-healed tooth marks that could only have been made by T.Rex. This is evidence of an animal that survived a T.Rex attack long enough for bone to partially heal (months/years). That would be hard if T.Rex were only a carrion specialist.

      There was always a lot of skepticism of the scavenger hypothesis. Just looking at T.Rex would tend to create skepticism. T.Rex is big, muscular, has incredibly strong jaws, lots and lots of sharp piercing teeth... definitely was the scariest thing around at the time. The biggest, scariest meat eater in any ecosystem is rarely a scavenger specialist.

      Another problem with the scavenger specialization idea is that T.Rex would have had pretty good binocular vision. Very useful for a predator. Scavengers don't need it so much.

      We still don't have good evidence about T.Rex's hunting style, though. I think one of the reasons the scavenger specialist idea has been so intriguing is that people had a hard time figuring out how T.Rex could take down something like Triceratops, given it's pretty tough defenses. Also, there is some evidence that T.Rex would not have been a fast runner, so how did it chase down some of the prey that seems like it would have been fast runners?

      When they find the partially-healed T.Rex bite marks I mentioned above, however, they tend to be on the prey's back. This would be pretty standard for a failed take-down, even among today's predators. Was it in fact a fast runner catching up from behind? If so, how did it take down Triceratops, which would probably turn and defend itself. Perhaps T.Rex was an ambush hunter, like today's Komodo Dragons, coming out of large brush and attacking from the side. Maybe T.Rex was a social hunter and surrounded its prey. I like to imagine T.Rex could leap over Triceratops horns, get behind it, get a grip on it's back, and shake it to death... But I have NO evidence for that, it's just fun to imagine.

    11. Re:Taking down a triceratops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. T. Rex only had to be faster than it's prey. So what if it was not a fast runner by cheetah or even lion standards. That doesn't matter. What matters Is how fast T. Rex was compared to Triceratops. Or the duck-bill of the era.

      2. How could T. Rex take down prey? With jaws and teeth like that? How about one chomp and wait? Kinda like the komodo dragon, except that instead of waiting for the prey to sicken and die from bite-caused infections, T. Rex could just wait for the prey to bleed out or even just fall over dead right on the spot.

    12. Re:Taking down a triceratops? by Grayhand · · Score: 1

      That's Horner's BS theory. There is no part of a T-Rex to hint at it being a scavenger. His claim is that an excellent sense of smell means scavenger. Most scavengers are small not oversized. His turkey vulture example is a poor one. Their size means they can cover more territory to find food. T-Rexs weren't built as long distant runners, they were built to fight by anyone's standards. They were likely short distance sprinters as in ambush hunters. You don't ambush stalk carrion. If they attacked Triceratop's necks there was a good reason. Necks have major arteries so their teeth would be perfect for opening up arteries so the triceratops would bleed out. They've also been found to have the same pockets in their teeth as Komodo Dragons so bacteria would build up, also not a feature of pure carrion eaters. Once their prey is bitten they'd just have to follow until their prey was weak from infection and blood loss. Their size would keep away the actual scavengers.

    13. Re:Taking down a triceratops? by pkphilip · · Score: 1

      The most interesting evidence are fossil bones of T.Rex prey that have partially-healed tooth marks that could only have been made by T.Rex.

      How does one go about confirming that a specific mark on the vertebrae of an animal definitely came about because a T-Rex bit it? Couldn't it have been caused by a tree trunk falling on the animal or be caused by another animal other than a T-Rex? Even herbivorous animals fight with each other and can cause serious damage to each other.

    14. Re:Taking down a triceratops? by OhANameWhatName · · Score: 1

      That would be hard if T.Rex were only a carrion specialist.

      What if the dinosaur was asleep?

    15. Re:Taking down a triceratops? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      What's funny about the turkey vulture comparison is that of (new world, at least) vultures, they're the only ones with a good sense of smell. I think it's a lot easier to find (non-avian) predators with excellent senses of smell.

      The point about soaring explaining the size of vultures is a good one, though size can still be use. Condors can more easily eat large and thick-hided carrion than the smaller vultures, and this could apply to t-rex. Also just like its size could scare off scavengers, it could also scare predators off a kill for an easy meal - though its doubtless that happened in any case. In vultures its the black vulture who dominates at kills, but there its about their superior dexterity on the ground.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    16. Re:Taking down a triceratops? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      How does one go about confirming that a specific mark on the vertebrae of an animal definitely came about because a T-Rex bit it?

      Cross sectional shape of the mark. Spacing and placement relative to other marks. etc. A falling tree isn't going to hit the animal and put a series of triangular puncture marks on opposite sides of the vertebrae, for example.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    17. Re:Taking down a triceratops? by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Perhaps T.Rex was an ambush hunter, like today's Komodo Dragons, coming out of large brush and attacking from the side. Maybe T.Rex was a social hunter and surrounded its prey.

      Clever Girl...

    18. Re:Taking down a triceratops? by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      Asleep is not dead. If T.Rex was a scavenger-specialist, it would know the difference between a dead animal and a sleeping animal that might get up and fight back.

    19. Re:Taking down a triceratops? by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      Trees are unlikely to leave grooves in bone that would be mistaken for T.Rex teeth marks. In fact, being hit with a tree tends to break bones, not scrape long puncture marks. We're talking about vertebra with 3-5 inch long grooves, which are pretty much perfect matches for the shape and spacing of T.Rex teeth. In the case of intra-species fighting, these herbivores simply don't have teeth or horns which could match such grooves.

      I guess it's possible there was another big predator out there at the time, but it would have to be about as tall as T.Rex, have similar-shaped teeth and have similar jaw strength in order to match the marks. So if it wasn't T.Rex, it would have to be something quite similar. If that were the case, then you'd have to be willing to conclude that T.Rex was a scavenger, but there was an unidentified therapod very similar to T.Rex that was a true predator. Why would that be any more convincing than just believing that this huge land-carnivore might have hunted live prey?

    20. Re:Taking down a triceratops? by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      Besides, didn't these Triceratopses have soft underbellies and such? Seems to me that the neck and face bits would be the LAST to go, not the first.

      I kind of agree with you here. It looks to me like all they showed was what the T.Rex does when it's time to go after the head/neck region. It does not necessarily show that it ate those parts first. However, I haven't seen the detailed study. It is possible that there is evidence that the head was first to be consumed. Maybe T.Rex sometimes abandoned the prey after eating the head/neck region. In such cases, T.Rex marks would only show up on the head/neck, while other scavengers' teeth would show up in the rest of the skeleton.

      Or maybe there's other reason to believe they'd go for the head first. Maybe there's a lot of fat on the neck. Many large predators go for fat deposits first (calories), then organs (calories and micro-nutrients), then muscle (less-caloric macro-nutrients like protein).

    21. Re:Taking down a triceratops? by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      1. Computer modeling points to T.Rex being slower than some of the animals we know it preyed on. Of course, the models could easily be wrong.

      2. Chomp-and-wait against Triceratops only works if you're a stalker (T.Rex was too big for that) or an ambush predator (which was one of the options I suggested). You're probably not going to run down a Triceratops. It wouldn't run away. It would turn and defend itself. That's why I lean towards ambush predator. I just don't know enough about the vegetation to know if there was anywhere a T.Rex could really hide. Komodo Dragons get away with ambushing because there are bushes in its habitat big enough to hide in (and in spite of it's bulk, a Komodo is pretty low to the ground... easier to hide that way). I keep trying to figure out how T.Rex is gonna hide in some bushes. But if the bushes are big enough...

      But another option against Triceratops is that T.Rex had some trick to avoiding those horns. That's why I suggested either social hunting or some kind of leaping move to get away from the horns. Even if it couldn't leap clear over Triceratops, maybe T.Rex could fake one direction, get Triceratops to commit, then quickly leap to the the other side, getting behind the crest and into position to bite Triceratops back. I'm just throwing ideas out at this point, though.

    22. Re:Taking down a triceratops? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Or maybe there's other reason to believe they'd go for the head first. Maybe there's a lot of fat on the neck. Many large predators go for fat deposits first (calories), then organs (calories and micro-nutrients), then muscle (less-caloric macro-nutrients like protein).

      The only reason I can see for ripping the head off first is that maybe the body was needed intact to act as an anchor or a counterweight. Otherwise it would be far, far simpler to consume the organs and body muscles first, then concentrate on the harder to reach bits. Or maybe it was the second T-Rex that ripped the head off after the first one had gorged itself on steaks and kidneys.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  12. Slashdot title of the year award goes to by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

    This story.

  13. Re:First shoot it with a .458 magnum - several tim by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And what if the T-Rex is left-handed? How is he going to operate the bolt mechanism? It's not like specialty rifles tend to cater for physiological minorities.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  14. Ask Slashdot: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't help but feel like this article should have been an "Ask Slashdot." Inquiring Cretacious minds want to know....

  15. Gone of the Head. by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

    It all seems familiar somehow.
    Step one: "Removing the head, or destroying the brain..."
    Let me guess, step two is: "You've got red on you.",
    and step three involves being "a bit bite-y."

    If that T-Rex is wielding a cricket bat it's proof what killed off the dinosaurs wasn't the asteroid -- It was the Zombies it caused.

  16. Lake Wobegon effect? by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

    Isn't this part of the Lake Wobegon effect? - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Wobegon_effect

    It sure does sound like so.

  17. What a stupid question. by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

    "Once a Tyrannosaurus took down a Triceratops, how did it go about eating it?"

    Any way it wanted to, of course.

    I can just picture Miss manners telling it to place a napkin on it's lap and which fork to use...

    Then becoming one of the hors d'oeuvres

  18. You keep using that word... by EGenius007 · · Score: 1

    "Theirs was the immortal battle"

    --
    I know what you did last summer. Just kidding, I don't work at the NSA.
  19. Simple Answer by Penurious+Penguin · · Score: 1

    - Primordial Bath Salts

    --
    Forward! -- Emperor Norton, 2012
  20. Triceratops by khr · · Score: 4, Funny

    Triceratops... It's what's for dinner!

  21. Easy by PPH · · Score: 1

    I grab the triceatops by the hind legs, flip it on its back and rub its belly. This puts it in a trance and then its helpless

    Bon Apetite.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  22. Re:First shoot it with a .458 magnum - several tim by LiENUS · · Score: 1

    5000 ft lbf of energy is "much more" than 13000 ft lbf? since when?

  23. Re:First shoot it with a .458 magnum - several tim by Nadaka · · Score: 1

    The hecate is a 20mm sniper/anti-material rifle.

  24. Re:First shoot it with a .458 magnum - several tim by Nadaka · · Score: 1

    damn it. That article isn't about the 20mm version.

  25. It's like the elephant joke... by Phydeaux · · Score: 1

    It's like the elephant joke...

    How do you eat an elephant?

    One bite at a time...

  26. This ain't jurassic park by partyguerrilla · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it remove the feathers first? Aren't dinosaurs supposed to be all feathered now?

  27. Re:First shoot it with a .458 magnum - several tim by TubeSteak · · Score: 2

    If you can afford a specialty hunting rifle, you can probably afford to have one made or modified for a left handed grip.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  28. Start by locating the cloaca by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First you have to find the cloaca. It's probably under the tail about here somewhere. Next, you want to get your tongue in there; a triceratops is pretty big, so you might have to use your whole face. Don't be afraid to get a little creative, because the triceratops will appreciate it. Paleontologists are unsure where the triceratops cli... Wait, you didn't say "How do you eat out a triceratops?" Uh, nevermind...

  29. Easier method by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

    Why didn't T. Rex just use it's hands to pull the head off? Oh wait.

    --
    The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
  30. Re:First shoot it with a .458 magnum - several tim by operagost · · Score: 2

    Why do the French need such a powerful gun to surrender?

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  31. Re:First shoot it with a .458 magnum - several tim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe he means the .500 S&W Magnum, and not the .50 BMG... The former has started to be used in rifles, and it's a lot more comparable (both are 300-500 GR, versus the .50's 650-800). Still, ".50 caliber rifle" should imply .50 BMG, and you're right on the money with that being no contest.

  32. Pull off the head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fnar, fnar

  33. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After suffering through so many useless science and technological news stories, Slashdot has finally posted something of practical use for its readers.

    Signed,
    A Tyrannosaurus Rex

  34. What Wine Would You Serve? by avgjoe62 · · Score: 3, Funny

    White? Red? Or would you serve it with some fava beans and a fine chianti?

    --

    How come Slashdot never gets Slashdotted?

    1. Re:What Wine Would You Serve? by LMariachi · · Score: 1

      Poultry normally goes with whites, but the meat of large muscular birds such as ostrich more closely resemble beef than chicken. However, large sedentary reptiles’ meat is more “chickeny.” I don’t picture a Triceratops doing a whole lot of running around, but it’s hard to say whether it would be more akin to an ostrich or an alligator. A Zin (NOT white Zin, ever) should cover the bases if you don’t know what you’re getting into, although it probably wouldn’t be the ideal choice for either. And of course all bets are off if you’re heavily spicing it, making a curry stew or whatever.

  35. Re:Ah Yes! Triceratops ... by Genda · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, more of a Jurassic Pinata.

  36. This is not science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While it is an interesting "story", this is not science. Every man and his dog can look at marks on a rock you pick up from the street on your way to work, and tell you "the history of it", the hypothesis of how it acquired the marks, etc. It will be an interesting story, but it is not science.
    Why? Because there is no way to test that hypothesis. There is no way to test whether these assertions are true.
    So while interesting, it just remains as stories. Plausible stories perhaps, but nothing more.

  37. Re:First shoot it with a .458 magnum - several tim by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

    Surrender is safest and easiest when the enemy is dead.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  38. Apparently just like a chocolate bunny by jbezorg · · Score: 2

    / that's all I got...

    --
    I've lost all my marbles except one & It's fun to test angular & centripetal acceleration in my skull
  39. The important question remains unanswered... by hey! · · Score: 2

    Hot sauce or garlic butter?

    If the flavor is kind of just "meh", you break out the pepper sauce. If the taste is *nasty* you go for the garlic butter.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  40. Re:First shoot it with a .458 magnum - several tim by gonzonista · · Score: 2

    Doesn't matter. Have you seen those tiny arms? T Rex will never be able to shoot straight.

    --
    If absolute power corrupts absolutely, what does this say about renewable power?
  41. This most emphatically is science by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

    While it is an interesting "story", this is not science. Every man and his dog can look at marks on a rock you pick up from the street on your way to work, and tell you "the history of it", the hypothesis of how it acquired the marks, etc. It will be an interesting story, but it is not science. Why? Because there is no way to test that hypothesis.

    Incorrect. Hypotheses about behavior inspired by review of any set of fossil evidence, like the one here, will produce predictions about what can expect to be found (and, more important, about what would not be expected to be found) in other fossil evidence not in the examined set on which the hypothesis was based. This provides a route to falsification of exactly the type seen everywhere else in empirical science.

    You can't directly observe the hypothesized behavior, but that's typical of scientific models -- what you can do is validate whether future observations match or conflict with what you would expect to be true if the hypothesis drawn from current observations were correct.

  42. Re:Ah Yes! Triceratops ... by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually, when I eat gummi bears, I usually eat the legs first, then the arms, then head, leaving the torso for last. Yes, I like my gummi bears to suffer and probably need some professional help.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  43. Re:First shoot it with a .458 magnum - several tim by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    one of those new Iranian 14.5mm sniper rifles would do nicely, assuming they don't blow apart when fired and they actually exist, rather than being some more iranian photoshop derived weapons

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  44. Re:First shoot it with a .458 magnum - several tim by Golddess · · Score: 1

    Have you seen those tiny arms? T Rex will never be able to shoot straight.

    He can with science!

    --
    "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
  45. Just in time for the American Thanksgiving feast.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was getting tired of turkey anyways...

  46. Re:First shoot it with a .458 magnum - several tim by MDMurphy · · Score: 1

    First shoot it with a .458 magnum several times (An elephant gun to those who don't know calibers and it's has MUCH more of a punch than a .50 caliber. A 20mm cannon would be better, but I have yet to see a rifle for that.), start a bonfire (you're NOT going to butcher the beast! IT's too big), and then when it's done, take a machete and hack off chunks.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.950_JDJ

  47. Where the rubber meets the road: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://i.imgur.com/CsCxz.jpg

  48. The lie of dinosaurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there a consensus dinosaurs ever existed? Many paleontologists seem to be full of their own speculative crap.

  49. Re:Ah Yes! Triceratops ... by jonadab · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wait...

    There are people who eat gummy bears one at a time (as opposed to just tossing handfuls of them into your gaping maw)?

    Huh. I learn somethin' new every day. Thanks, Slashdot.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  50. How did T-rex eat a Triceratops? by reboot246 · · Score: 1

    A very clumsy 69?

  51. Re:Ah Yes! Triceratops ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yes. It might be a shock to you, but some of us aren't fat asses.

  52. Headless Chicken Triceratops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If dinosaur brains were par for retarded chickens, then removing the (hard to get at) head might still leave the hindbrain running around with the much more yummy rest. If the crest wre really blood-filled, mauling it might cause fainting from blood-loss and hypotheria - thoiugh Dame Nature probably had emergency reactions for such situations. Cracking the hindbrain first - like big cats "do" - would make much more sense. Then bite off enough from the rear to quickly bleed it to death. Besides, triceratops didn't have armored underbellies, did they? Remember. A wounded predator, is often a dead predator.

  53. Wayback Machine by sudonim2 · · Score: 1

    Trilobite! Trilobites! Betcha can't eat the heads!

  54. If you eat a triceratops when you first wake up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you eat a triceratops when you first wake up... nothing worse will happen to you all day, unless later on in the day the Earth is struck by a giant meteor, ultimately wiping out every species with a mean adult body weight over 25 pounds.

    Incidentally, if you can eat a triceratops, you probably fall in this category.

  55. Re:First shoot it with a .458 magnum - several tim by Aighearach · · Score: 1
  56. Really? by kakaburra · · Score: 1

    How the hell is this on /.??

  57. Re:First shoot it with a .458 magnum - several tim by nicomede · · Score: 1

    It's common knowledge that the military equipment preferred by Tyranosaurs is the F-14 Tomcat. Soooooo cool!

  58. Who knows anymore by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    One tactic T-rex might have used is the same as the giant lizard (komodo dragon), it rushes the prey, takes one septic bite, then trails the enemy till it dies.

    The hyena was considered a carrior eater but makes more kills then the lion who was considered a predator.

    And considering build, the Hyena seems closer to the T-rex then a buzzard. Powerful jaw and neck muscles that can deliver a massive traumatic bite to anything living or dead.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  59. Re:First shoot it with a .458 magnum - several tim by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 1

    Doesn't matter. Have you seen those tiny arms? T Rex will never be able to shoot straight.

    Exactly

    --
    Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
  60. Re:Ah Yes! Triceratops ... by jonadab · · Score: 1

    Actually, personally, I don't eat gummi bears at all. I've never cared for them.

    (This does not stop me from getting fat eating other foods, of course...)

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  61. Re:Ah Yes! Triceratops ... by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    Well, since I really only like the green and red ones, I pretty much have to eat them singularly, or at most 2-3 at a time.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  62. What? by g0bshiTe · · Score: 0

    This makes no sense, why would you start with the head, it's an animal that's in your diet you would know that the head and accompanying plate is the hardest part of the animal. When a lion kills a gazelle or zebra it doesn't start eating the head, it goes for the tender gut where there are fewer bones and more meat. They also don't start eating the animal until it's dead, it's just too dangerous for them to start chomping away. They will bite the neck to suffocate the animal. Perhaps these people are mistaking that type behavior in trex. I could see a trex biting down on a tyrannosaur neck to suffocate it before it started gobbling up the middle part. It would also not go for the head because there would be competition, it wouldn't take long before other dynos appeared at the buffet, this would be more reason for it to start with the tender guts, it could eat more before others showed up.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!