Slashdot Mirror


Google Nexus 4 Prototype Lost In a Bar

theodp writes "A little over a year ago, an iPhone 4s prototype walked into a San Francisco bar, prompting a controversial manhunt by a now-deceased Apple investigator and the SFPD. Now, Wired reports that a Nexus 4 prototype walked into a San Francisco bar last month, prompting Google to sic its security team on 'Sudsy,' a San Francisco bartender who notified Google that he'd found their phone, which was slated to make its debut at a since-cancelled Android event on Oct. 29. When the 'Google Police' showed up at the bar, Sudsy's co-worker sent the 'desperate' Google investigator on a wild goose chase which landed him in an under-siege SFPD Station, from which he and Sudsy's lawyer had to be escorted out of under the watch of police in full riot gear with automatic weapons so the pair could arrange a 1 a.m. pickup of the phone."

200 comments

  1. Google Police by DogManhunt · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Nice to see Google walking around with private investigators and lawyers just because one of their workers "forgot" his phone in a bar. Do no evil, amirite?

    1. Re:Google Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Would you prefer they'd sent a blade runner instead?

    2. Re:Google Police by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Funny

      They should go straight to Taffy's bar.

    3. Re:Google Police by Altanar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I highly suggest you read the article since the summary is highly edited to make Google look bad. Example: Google didn't send a private investigator. It sent a single Google employee who was jerked around by the bartender and his friend because they wanted to cling to their powertrip. The only lawyer was just guy the bartender knew. Google even offered to give the bartender guy a free phone if he promised to be quiet about the leak until the phone was announced at the Android event.

      Bad Luck Google: Sends a guy to pick up a lost phone. Gets screwed around by the people who found it. Still offers a free phone to the guy. Gets called evil by the Internet.

    4. Re:Google Police by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What evil? Someone lost his phone, the company that owns it sends a guy over to collect it. Given the fact that it was an important prototype, it's understandable that the guy was a bit anxious to get it back.

      Then again, Google might have staged the whole thing. I think they are a little jealous of Apple, with their millions of fans going ohh and ahh over fuzzy pictures of a frickin' new docking connector of all things...

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    5. Re:Google Police by r1348 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Brand new /. account posts pretestuos anti-Google comment the same minute the story is published.
      Shill anyone?

    6. Re:Google Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Three Questions.

      How can you loose a phone while showing it off to all your friends in a bar?

      Its already been knocked off in China so whats the big deal?

      Can I have one?

    7. Re:Google Police by mrbester · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not that it's my kind of place, but apparently he's on the level if you want a drink.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    8. Re:Google Police by skegg · · Score: 4, Informative

      You must have somehow missed these lines:

      global investigations and intelligence manager at Google

      He insisted on meeting ASAP, that night, at the bar. Barton refused. Telling co-workers he felt “harassed,”

      “He was little but really pushy, like military. He said he wanted to keep me out of trouble — like I was in any kind of trouble — keep the bar out of trouble. They could file criminal charges, he said.”

      Kind of paints a different picture to yours, oui / non?

    9. Re:Google Police by Maow · · Score: 5, Informative

      I highly suggest you read the article since the summary is highly edited to make Google look bad. Example: Google didn't send a private investigator. It sent a single Google employee who was jerked around by the bartender and his friend because they wanted to cling to their powertrip.

      Bad Luck Google: Sends a guy to pick up a lost phone. Gets screwed around by the people who found it. Still offers a free phone to the guy. Gets called evil by the Internet.

      Not quite how I read it. The guy that came to pick up the phone sent a flood of calls to bartender's teck-savvy friend (who'd contacted Google on his behalf). Bartender felt "harassed" so didn't stick around work for what he seemed to think would be a confrontational meeting.

      Indeed, Google rep was described as pushy and seemed to threaten the other employee and maybe even the bar with some kind of charges, although the bartender was not resisting the return of the phone. Colleague that dealt with the rep didn't like being threatened and sent rep on "wild goose chase" to police station.

      Seemed to me that Google's security team could've done a bit better job on the recovery had they used a bit less bluster and a bit more appreciation (aka people skills).

      Now, I'm not sure how it worked out that the bartender, although offered a free phone to keep quiet, still seems to have provided photos to accompany the story. Should've taken the free phone and shut up about it. I believe the story contained a disclaimer about paying for the photos.

    10. Re:Google Police by beelsebob · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Idiot assumes that someone posting within the first minute on the world's most popular tech news web site must have had something to do with the article... Believe it or not, people who disagree with you are not all shills.

    11. Re:Google Police by r1348 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Moron fails to recognize obvious patterns.

    12. Re:Google Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, yes, they _could_ file charges. If you remember a certain other company losing prototype phone a while ago, retrieval in that case involved a police raid with company's employee present at the scene - despite this not being a usual police procedure.

    13. Re:Google Police by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Bad Luck Google: Sends a guy to pick up a lost phone. Gets screwed around by the people who found it. Still offers a free phone to the guy. Gets called evil by the Internet.

      And the police in riot gear weren't there for the phone, as implied in the summary, from TFA:

      On nearby 14th Street, undercover cops had just gunned down a gang suspect in the road after he produced an illegal TEC-9 semi-automatic pistol and appeared to point it at one of them. The neighborhood erupted in outrage, and dozens of people attacked and vandalized the Mission precinct station while Katz was still inside.

      “It was the night of the riot,” says Ragi Dindial, a lawyer Barton knew through the music scene. “I met Katz there and they hustled us out the back door, past riot police in full riot gear and automatic weapons.”

    14. Re:Google Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Shitty bar. Guy loses something, it instantly becomes bartender's property? No lost and found box? No turning over to the police, or trying to find the owner? It's a bar after all, so, I expect people losing/forgetting stuff is a frequent occurence.

      No wonder the guy didn't want the publicity and tried to spin it. As a bartender he's done.

    15. Re:Google Police by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 2

      Disclosure not disclaimer. Wired actually admits paying the phone finder: "(Disclosure: Wired agreed to pay Barton a freelance fee for the photos published with this article.)"

      But yes, Google wasn't exactly being nice here. Maybe that was part of the comedy act? That "little but really pushy" Google agent going up against the bartender's "well-inked" associate with a "don't-fuck-with-me" attitude.

      What's with all the cloak-and-dagger over some cellphone that resembles every other cellphone made within the past two years? If I were the head of research at one of these mobile companies, I'll order any employee taking out a phone for testing to have the phone chained to his or her wrist.

    16. Re:Google Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Shh... don't you know? When an action is taken by Apple, it's evil. When the same action is taken by Google, it's "protecting themselves". Subscribe to the Slashdot double-standard or be damned!

    17. Re:Google Police by truesaer · · Score: 2

      Being a little pushy isn't a shocking crime. And as they intentionally started fucking with him I would expect security to warn them that they could get in trouble.

      Where was the phone? Did the bartender take it with him? I'm pretty sure bartenders don't get to take lost phones home with them, if I were in security I'd be warning them about that too! The bartender or manager on duty at the bar should have had access to the phone and returned it.

      What's this "meet me at noon tomorrow" garbage? The bar is open, a representative of the phone's owner is there to claim it. He says most people come back in 15 minutes, do all of them have to return the next day at noon?

      In the end, it all worked out fine and I don't think hurt feelings on behalf of a bartender who went out of his way to screw with the Google guy is a big deal.

    18. Re:Google Police by JASegler · · Score: 1

      Try RTFA:
      >Not this phone. It sat by the cash register unclaimed all the next day. “I don’t know anything about this stuff, but I know enough to know this phone was different.”

      So the phone sat in the bar for a day and then they tried to figure out who owned it. Sounds pretty reasonable to me.

    19. Re:Google Police by sgunhouse · · Score: 1

      Now, I'm not sure how it worked out that the bartender, although offered a free phone to keep quiet, still seems to have provided photos to accompany the story. Should've taken the free phone and shut up about it. I believe the story contained a disclaimer about paying for the photos.

      Easy one. The people he sold the photos to probably offered him more money. Why take one free phone when you could buy several?

    20. Re:Google Police by Ol+Biscuitbarrel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was wondering about this last night. Why are the nerds at Google naming a product after a model of skin job? Are they running some kind of Voigt Kampff test on their clientele?

    21. Re:Google Police by JabberWokky · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Bartender felt "harassed" so didn't stick around work for what he seemed to think would be a confrontational meeting.

      Seriously? If it were your normal phone with photos of your family, and the person who found it took off -- with your phone, that you owned, would that be considered reasonable?

      Forget everything about it being "unreleased". That is moot as hell. There's no provision of ethics that an object being "really really cool" gives you a different standard when it comes to returning lost property.

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    22. Re:Google Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the bartenders friend doesn't like the Google employees tone so, instead of giving the owners their phone back and ending this situation, he sends him on a wild goose chase. Now replace Google with yourself and I'm sure you wouldn't find the goose chase necessary. In fact you'd probably think something fishy was going on.

    23. Re:Google Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To your credit. Your eloquence and mannerisms do speak towards a (market) research director that is failing at gaming the system.

    24. Re:Google Police by torkus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here's the thing...

      The bartender did not own the phone. 'Finders-keepers' is NOT the law. The opposite in fact.

      Yeah, it's not a federal manhunt type case but the guy knowingly in possession of property not belonging to him (the lost vs. stolen line gets blurred quickly) could definitely have criminal charges filed against him. How far they'd get, who knows.

      Of course they insisted on meeting right away. They want to protect their secrecy - and getting the phone back is far easier on everyone than the guy possibly getting arrested. You can't expect a company to just let this type of thing go.

      What I really want to know is why these people are bringing top secret phones to bars in the first place? I understand "testing" and all but is it secret or is it something you're bringing out in public?

      Hell, get one of those bluetooth leashes. Problem solved.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    25. Re:Google Police by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Three Questions.

      How can you loose a phone while showing it off to all your friends in a bar?

      And how can you not ask at the bar you were in if they found your phone for over 24 hours? Unless you wanted somebody to "find" it.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    26. Re:Google Police by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 2

      I highly suggest you read the article since the summary is highly edited to make Google look bad. Example: Google didn't send a private investigator. It sent a c who was jerked around by the bartender and his friend because they wanted to cling to their powertrip. The only lawyer was just guy the bartender knew. Google even offered to give the bartender guy a free phone if he promised to be quiet about the leak until the phone was announced at the Android event.

      Bad Luck Google: Sends a guy to pick up a lost phone. Gets screwed around by the people who found it. Still offers a free phone to the guy. Gets called evil by the Internet.

      Amazing how you skillfully avoided to mention every single bit of the article that could make Google look bad.

      Like the obvious intimidation of the guy who called Google. "Google had him pretty worked up. They told him he could be an accessory or something.”

      Then (unsuccessfully) insisting that the bartender who found the phone stay at the bar to meet him ASAP - after his working hours, when he had a planned gig.

      Continued with the "single Google employee" being "pushy" and threatening another bartender and the whole bar with legal action "He was little but really pushy, like military. He said he wanted to keep me out of trouble — like I was in any kind of trouble — keep the bar out of trouble. They could file criminal charges, he said.”

      Is there a special Google filter you can run on articles that whitewashes Google?

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    27. Re:Google Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose the point is to do as much real world testing as possible. They don't expect reporters to carry with them a list of Google employees with photo so that if they are spotted in public places, hundreds of pictures of their phones can be taken in order to maybe catch a secret.

    28. Re:Google Police by nukenerd · · Score: 2
      Five questions

      Three Questions.

      How can you loose a phone while showing it off to all your friends in a bar?

      Its already been knocked off in China so whats the big deal?

      Can I have one?

      And how can you not ask at the bar you were in if they found your phone for over 24 hours? Unless you wanted somebody to "find" it.

      And WTF is a guy with a commercially secret document/plad/prototype on his person doing hanging around in a drinking establishment? It should have been Office -> car -> home -> car -> office

    29. Re:Google Police by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

      It makes you ask the question - "Then, why can't they make a Cell Phone that can't be left in a bar?" You'd think that with all the wonders of technology, they'd invent a solution to this obviously dreadful and omipresent epidemic danger.

      Apparently, an important real-world test of a cell phone seems to be their performance in a small crowd of people while under the influence of alcohol. You'd think a valuable prototype in Alpha test would be tracked and controlled a little better. No, a LOT better, actually. Like, after the Apple fiasco, rule number one would be "Don't take it into a bar"!

      Pfft. Sounds like another "marketing" stunt to me.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    30. Re:Google Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Single Google employee" being "pushy" is extremely evil, indeed. They should've done like Holy Apple did and send in the police to raid his house instead.

      How dare they be pushy when a bar employee takes someone else's property and just goes away, instead of, you know, leaving it to police or the bar manager. After all, he just wanted to make a little money on the side selling photos to Wired, not sell the phone. They should've known and don't be jerks!

      Get out of that RDF, dude.

    31. Re:Google Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's easy to see why you're the leading asshole in your company.

    32. Re:Google Police by NetNinja · · Score: 1

      It's all about how cool I look with a phone nobody else has. Like it's going to help them pick up chicks. Here is a tip for all those Apple nubs and now Google nubs who think taking a prototype phone to a bar is going to get you laid.

      Open your mouth and say. Hello, my name is _________.
      Take it from there.

    33. Re:Google Police by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Five questions

      Three Questions.

      How can you loose a phone while showing it off to all your friends in a bar?

      Its already been knocked off in China so whats the big deal?

      Can I have one?

      And how can you not ask at the bar you were in if they found your phone for over 24 hours? Unless you wanted somebody to "find" it.

      And WTF is a guy with a commercially secret document/plad/prototype on his person doing hanging around in a drinking establishment? It should have been Office -> car -> home -> car -> office

      Actually I can't see why that secret prototype should ever have left the office.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    34. Re:Google Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google didn't send a private investigator.

      They sent "Brian Katz, global investigations and intelligence manager." Only through the most tortuous definitions of "private investigator" can you conclude that this guy, who is clearly part of Google's security team, is not a "private investigator." He doesn't work for a gov't agency, and he investigates: he is a private investigator.

      He also stalked the bartender and harassed him for an evening trying to get the phone back. From TFA: “He was little but really pushy, like military. He said he wanted to keep me out of trouble — like I was in any kind of trouble — keep the bar out of trouble. They could file criminal charges, he said.”

      Also from the article: "According to Dindial, Katz offered Barton a free phone (it will likely have a retail value of about $300) if he agreed to keep quiet about the incident and not release photos or discuss the phone with the press until after Monday’s press conference. (Disclosure: Wired agreed to pay Barton a freelance fee for the photos published with this article.)"

      Oh wow, "We won't get you arrested, and we'll give you a free shitty phone if you'll just shut up about it." Yeah, Google really was a white knight in this scenario - truly living up that "don't be evil" slogan.

    35. Re:Google Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What I really want to know is why these people are bringing top secret phones to bars in the first place? I understand "testing" and all but is it secret or is it something you're bringing out in public?"

      It is part of usability and use case testing.

      Example, I have used now a one month new smartphone from Jolla. I can not take photos from it and post them online nor I can actually talk anything about it. I have shown it to one of my friends who actually takes any secrecy very seriously. But I wouldn't let him even take photos from it. He has used the phone and have got strong personal opinion of it. I have as well my own personal opinions of it but I can not even say what kind.

      I use the phone in daily basis, doing different use case scenario testing, trying to solve specific tasks and so on. And I report them in real time. I have even a contact what can give more real time tech support if needed.

      Even when I have hold this phone in line ups in local food stores and movie theater, no one actually care what kind phone you do have because it is so common to see someone standing somewhere with a smartphone or even a tablet. But if I would start talking aloud about it, showing display and presenting it so people around would notice it, they would come to check it out.

      So unless you are in bar, placing phone on next seat or table and forgetting it there or allowing someone to snatch it, then it is huge problem.
      We can not do hardware nor software testing in laboratories or in van driving around city or hiding in shadows at night.

      Once I got caught by one tech nerd and all what I could do was act naturally and place it back to pocket and answer for queries of manufacturer and model just "I just got it".

    36. Re:Google Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yep, Apple employees lost a prototype phone in a bar twice and now Google does it. Wouldn't be surprised if Apple had a business method patent on something like a "controlled method of leaking information to increase hype".

    37. Re:Google Police by thoughtlover · · Score: 1

      It makes you ask the question - "Then, why can't they make a Cell Phone that can't be left in a bar?"

      You'd have to have a separate device that you always carry that syncs/pings the other device. I'm thinking Bluetooth. Once the phone is out of range, your Bluetooth headset or a similar device on your keychain can beep/vibrate. Using signal strength, you might be able to devise a tracking scheme where you get more beeps as you get closer to the device (in the case someone took your phone, at least you will be close to them; then ask a friend to call your phone, hear the ring, see the person answer it and bust em!). I'm not really sure this is possible given the low bandwidth of Bluetooth and I'm pretty sure you'd need low latency, too. I configured my computer to lock the screen if my phone leaves the range of its Bluetooth signal.

      --
      No sig for you! Come back one year!
    38. Re:Google Police by Maow · · Score: 1

      Bartender felt "harassed" so didn't stick around work for what he seemed to think would be a confrontational meeting.

      Seriously? If it were your normal phone with photos of your family, and the person who found it took off -- with your phone, that you owned, would that be considered reasonable?

      Forget everything about it being "unreleased". That is moot as hell. There's no provision of ethics that an object being "really really cool" gives you a different standard when it comes to returning lost property.

      If I found a phone, had a friend contact the owner, then *pulls number from arse* a dozen calls came back about it instead of, "thanks, I'll be right there", I might question the sanity of the owner.

      If the owner then started making demands on me, I'd be right pissed off. Wouldn't feel bad at all about going out to do something else if I'd been ordered to stay put or interrogated when trying to locate the owner.

      You wouldn't?!?

    39. Re:Google Police by Maow · · Score: 1

      Shitty bar. Guy loses something, it instantly becomes bartender's property? No lost and found box? No turning over to the police, or trying to find the owner? It's a bar after all, so, I expect people losing/forgetting stuff is a frequent occurence.

      No wonder the guy didn't want the publicity and tried to spin it. As a bartender he's done.

      Interesting how you learned to write without learning to read.

    40. Re:Google Police by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      And I'm sure you said the same thing about the incident with the iPhone prototype.

    41. Re:Google Police by s73v3r · · Score: 2

      These phones need to be tested in real world environments.

    42. Re:Google Police by Maow · · Score: 1

      So the bartenders friend doesn't like the Google employees tone so, instead of giving the owners their phone back and ending this situation, he sends him on a wild goose chase. Now replace Google with yourself and I'm sure you wouldn't find the goose chase necessary. In fact you'd probably think something fishy was going on.

      If I were Google I might think something fishy were going on, but silly me with my super power called "introspection" I might think, "maybe I shouldn't have called back 10 times, making demands & threats. Maybe I should've said thanks and arranged the meeting."

      Catching flies with honey instead of vinegar, etc.

    43. Re:Google Police by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      Except, just about everything you described would be the actions of an asshole. I thought we believed Google to be better than that.

    44. Re:Google Police by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      Being a little pushy isn't a shocking crime.

      And yet everyone here would condemn Apple for doing the same thing.

    45. Re:Google Police by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      They should've done like Holy Apple did and send in the police to raid his house instead.

      You mean to the guy who sold the prototype, knowing it wasn't his, and knowing that the people he sold it to would publish photos of it?

    46. Re:Google Police by Meski · · Score: 1

      The only question I have is, when is it being released now, and did this event have any connection with the delay?

    47. Re:Google Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Google's failure is inability to calculate that it wouldn't be like this this time.

      I mean, they know when you go to pee, but they couldn't calculate this guy just wanted to hold it for awhile and won't sell it or run to journalists for a quick buck? How lame.

      Isn't it usual practice for employees to take whatever they find at the job with them everywhere, instead of leaving it with local pollice or their management?

    48. Re:Google Police by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

      They got 'em.

      http://www.amazon.com/ZOMM-Wireless-Bluetooth-Speakerphone-Personal/dp/B003N3J6F6

      Why the hell Google can't spring for a lousy 50 dollar gadget to protect a multi-millon dollar prototype phone is completely beyond me.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    49. Re:Google Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because this is clearly a staged publicity stunt by Google, hoping to generate buzz in its lackluster, flagging Nexus line.

      "Worked for Apple," they said!

    50. Re:Google Police by r1348 · · Score: 1

      We're all sorry you couldn't live up to your father's standards, but it's really time to undertake anger management therapy and move on with life.

    51. Re:Google Police by JabberWokky · · Score: 1

      I certainly might. In which case I'd chuck the phone into the bar's lost and found box and leave. I would not take something that had been found at the bar, that I knew was not mine, and that I knew somebody was really trying to get back, with me to my other job and have somebody lie about where I -- and their phone that I had taken with me -- was.

      You would?

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    52. Re:Google Police by Maow · · Score: 1

      I certainly might. In which case I'd chuck the phone into the bar's lost and found box and leave. I would not take something that had been found at the bar, that I knew was not mine, and that I knew somebody was really trying to get back, with me to my other job and have somebody lie about where I -- and their phone that I had taken with me -- was.

      You would?

      If I found something very valuable, I'd keep it with me so I could ensure it got to the rightful owner and not get stolen from the lost & found, as it may get pinned on me. Especially by such a pushy owner.

      And, he didn't have somebody lie, the somebody did that because of the threatening behaviour of the Google guy.

    53. Re:Google Police by JabberWokky · · Score: 1

      Okay, so you'd do things differently. I just hope you're not the one taking off with somebody's lost phone. I doubt most people could jump through your hoops with an associate lying about where their phone is rather than (what is usually the case) just go by the bar where they left it and pick it up.

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    54. Re:Google Police by the+plant+doctor · · Score: 1

      Three Questions.

      How can you loose a phone while showing it off to all your friends in a bar?

      Its already been knocked off in China so whats the big deal?

      Can I have one?

      One question.

      How do you loose a phone in a bar? It's an inanimate object, or so I'd suppose.

      C'mon, this is /. We're supposed to be an educated crowd here.

    55. Re:Google Police by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      And WTF is a guy with a commercially secret document/plad/prototype on his person doing hanging around in a drinking establishment? It should have been Office -> car -> home -> car -> office

      Because you want to test it in a real world situation.
      I've worked on one of these "super secret" devices. I was never told not to take it in public. Although for me, mine stay on my desk. But my boss took his home, and worked on it on the bus. I know the testers went to the local starbucks.
      Devices such as these are designed to be in places other than the Office, car, and house. So you need to take them there.

    56. Re:Google Police by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      Seemed to me that Google's security team could've done a bit better job on the recovery had they used a bit less bluster and a bit more appreciation (aka people skills).

      Have you ever met one of these guys? They are proof of reincarnation because no one could learn to be such a dick in just one lifetime.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    57. Re:Google Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If I find your damned phone, I'll return it to you ASAP. That does not include skipping my child's soccer game, skipping class, or probably even showing up at work on my day off (especially if you are being a DICK.) "You'll bring my phone down here RIGHT NOW!" equals a toss in the nearest body of water, period.

    58. Re:Google Police by Nikker · · Score: 1

      By just a hand full of people all in the same city? You work for any Canadian telcoms by chance?

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    59. Re:Google Police by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      Actually I can't see why that secret prototype should ever have left the office.

      Real world testing conditions.

    60. Re:Google Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Except they didn't do the same thing.

      They went all gestapo on his ass.

      Don't even try to relate the two. Someone being a little pushy to get a secret prototype is vastly different than raiding the persons home and confiscating his unrelated gear.

    61. Re:Google Police by Yakasha · · Score: 1

      Here's the thing...

      The bartender did not own the phone. 'Finders-keepers' is NOT the law.

      It is sometimes.

      the guy knowingly in possession of property not belonging to him (the lost vs. stolen line gets blurred quickly) could definitely have criminal charges filed against him.

      Nope. If there are clues to the real owner, you must make a reasonable attempt to contact the owner and return the property (California penal code section 485). The bartender did. The investigator was a lying dick.

    62. Re:Google Police by jabelli · · Score: 1

      Even the cheap $30 earpiece I got from Wal-Mart tells me when it's not connected to the phone. Just this morning, I started pulling out of my driveway when it said "Lost connection." I had left the phone on my desk in the living room. If I turn it on and my phone isn't in range, it says "No phone is connected" instead of "Phone one connected" after announcing the talk time.

    63. Re:Google Police by Khyber · · Score: 1

      I don't have to game a system when my product does what it purports to do and NOTHING ELSE.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    64. Re:Google Police by Khyber · · Score: 1

      I did anger management, from several different doctors in Texas, Tennessee, and California.

      Turns out, I'm not angry. I have a better grasp of reality than all of you and react appropriately.

      Enjoy your fantasy world while I continue to quietly dominate the agricultural market. Eventually, you'll be praising me, not God, for your food.

      ~designer of zero-light food production, not just germinating fodder grass

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    65. Re:Google Police by r1348 · · Score: 1

      Did you call your dog Napoleon?

    66. Re:Google Police by Khyber · · Score: 1

      I don't own dogs.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    67. Re:Google Police by r1348 · · Score: 1

      Too bad, it would be a perfect match for your megalomaniac profile.

  2. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is difficult to take seriously.

    1. Re:Really? by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 3, Funny

      All that's missing is the hard bitten gumshoe and the dame with legs that go on and on...

  3. nope by jmd_akbar · · Score: 2

    nope.. don't believe it!!

    --
    Nothing here... So... SHOOO!!!
  4. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    why wouldn't you just return the fucking property?

    why play hide and seek? why play games at all? just give them their property, FFS.

    1. Re:WTF? by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      It says right there in the fucking article: "What was I supposed to do, look for the guy with Google shirt? How did I know this guy didn't work for Apple?"

    2. Re:WTF? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2

      Because obviously Apple would be monitoring Google's phone lines and sending ninja impersonators to intercept Google's business dealing.

      Whether TFA said that or not, how would that even work? You call Google. Google says they'll come to the place you're calling from. How likely is it that someone else is going to show up there, then, looking for the caller?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    3. Re:WTF? by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

      I also rather suspect Google employees carry some sort of card that identifies them as a Google employee. Easy to forge? Perhaps, but probably sufficient for this purpose.

    4. Re:WTF? by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

      Yes, I have a whole pile of them. They're these little cardboard rectangles called "Business Cards".

      They also probably have google-issued smartcard ID's of some sort as well.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    5. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... the bartender being a normal human being (not a lawyer) probably doesn't know to what extent he's liable for this "lost prototype." Ya granted Apple won't do that because it would be really stupid for an established business to do but you don't know what some random asshole is going to try. You also don't know the full extent of your liability and then you understand why the bartender is paranoid. Right, he should put the rest of his life and his savings and small business on the line because google fucked up. Whatever.

    6. Re:WTF? by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      Probably had been paid to let some hack have the phone over night hence wanting to return it the next day.

    7. Re:WTF? by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      This is also a detail that TFA discusses, noting that the Google ID badge just has the employee's name on it, and is relatively nondescript otherwise. All the rest of the info is RFID or something. (I'm sure somebody from Google could confirm/deny this, if anyone's still reading this thread at this point.)

  5. What is this fucking summary about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It does not parse right in any of the 6 natural and about 12 computer languages I know well. Can someone translate?

    1. Re:What is this fucking summary about? by ericloewe · · Score: 2

      Have you tried 'idiot'? I hear it almost sounds like English at times.

      I doubt it'll sound better in 'idiot', though, it sounds pretty absurd in English.

    2. Re:What is this fucking summary about? by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's in two layers! Layer one is a factual summary about a barman finding a lost Google prototype. Layer two is a veiled rant about companies overreacting when their trade secrets may be compromised.

    3. Re:What is this fucking summary about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer 'stupid'. Much easier to pick up than 'idiot'.

    4. Re:What is this fucking summary about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It does not parse right"? It looks like you should study those 6 natural languages a bit more, and stop being such a hypocrite.

    5. Re:What is this fucking summary about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? What's your complaint, that language should "be parsed" rather than "parse", or that "right" can't be an adverb?
      You're wrong on both counts, you prescriptivist moron.

    6. Re:What is this fucking summary about? by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      Here you go:
      "Yon ti kras plis pase yon ane de sa, yon iPhone pwototip 4s mache nan yon San Francisco bar, sa ki pouse yon manhunt kontwovÃsyal pa yon kounye a-moun ki mouri anketà Apple ak SFPD la. Koulye a, Wired rapà ke yon Nexus 4 pwototip mache nan yon bar Francisco dÃnye San mwa, sa ki pouse Google nan sik ekip sekirite li a sou ', savoneuz' yon San Francisco Bartender ki avize Google ke li ta jwenn telefÃn yo, ki te chache fà okazyone li nan yon depi-anile evÃnman android sou OktÃb 29. Là a 'Google Polis' te montre yo nan bar la, nan savoneuz ko-travayà voye 'dezespere' Google anketà a sou yon Chase zwa sovaj ki te ateri l 'nan yon anba-sÃnen toupatou Station SFPD, ki soti nan ki li menm ansanm ak avoka savoneuz a te dwe akonpaye deyà nan anba gade a nan polis yo nan KovÃti pou revÃlt plen ak zam otomatik se konsa pà a te kapab fà aranjman pou yon 1 am vin chÃche nan telefÃn nan. "

    7. Re:What is this fucking summary about? by Provocateur · · Score: 2

      But shouldn't we be worried about an under seige SFPD station? It's like that joke about the detergent being able to get the blood off the shirt...

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  6. fdsfds by bmo · · Score: 4, Funny

    A lawyer, a priest, a rabbi, and a Nexus 4 prototype walked into a San Francisco bar ....

    --
    BMO

    1. Re:fdsfds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no need for dirty jokes on Slashdot.

    2. Re:fdsfds by roman_mir · · Score: 4, Funny

      but only one was good enough for the bartender to pick up.

    3. Re:fdsfds by JamesP · · Score: 5, Funny

      The real mystery is: what kind of Google employee goes to a bar?

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    4. Re:fdsfds by martin-boundary · · Score: 2

      Gee, I hope he didn't try to pick up the 1-year old...

    5. Re:fdsfds by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The PR goon who is supposed to somehow create a story about their new phone. Duh.

      But it was already old when Apple pulled the stunt.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:fdsfds by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

      The real mystery is: what kind of Google employee goes to a bar?

      ...the kind that drink.!!!!

    7. Re:fdsfds by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      Maybe searching for love on Google wasn't working out so well...

    8. Re:fdsfds by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      what kind of Google employee goes to a bar?

      I realise that I only know a subset of Google employees and that there may be some selection bias involved, but extrapolating from my experience: all of them. Although only when they get bored of the beer that Google provides in the office.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    9. Re:fdsfds by plover · · Score: 2

      A lawyer, a priest, a rabbi, and a Nexus 4 prototype walked into a San Francisco bar ....

      Stop! I've heard this one before.

      --
      John
    10. Re:fdsfds by aliquis · · Score: 1

      No that was the priest.

    11. Re:fdsfds by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2

      A lawyer, a priest, a rabbi, and a Nexus 4 prototype walked into a San Francisco bar ....

      Also a policeman, Indian, sailor, and construction worker.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    12. Re:fdsfds by bmo · · Score: 1

      That works too...

      But the Village People was a NY group...

      --
      BMO

    13. Re:fdsfds by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      I found out last week that I work a block away from the YMCA, as in, the YMCA. They might be a NY group, but we've heard of them here in SF.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    14. Re:fdsfds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm thinking if Apple and Google stopped putting feet on their products, their products would stop walking into bars.

    15. Re:fdsfds by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      I regularly meet Google employees in bars.

    16. Re:fdsfds by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      I've experienced the beer that Google serves in the office. To be fair, I'm a big beer nerd, but I haven't found that beer to be satisfactory.

    17. Re:fdsfds by bmo · · Score: 1

      You mean like this?

      http://www.blogcdn.com/www.tuaw.com/media/2010/10/bananajr6k.jpeg

      These days it's not limited by the cord length.

      --
      BMO

  7. Yanno? by Bieeanda · · Score: 5, Funny

    With a character named Sudsy and a police station 'under siege', this would make a better script for a story where Dick Tracy misplaces his wrist radio.

  8. Just in case you're wondering about the riot cops by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 5, Informative

    under the watch of police in full riot gear with automatic weapons

    This had nothing to do with the lost phone. Some punk got shot and people went nuts.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  9. Re:Just in case you're wondering about the riot co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What about the now-deceased investigator, does it have anything to do with the lost phone?

  10. Re:Just in case you're wondering about the riot co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Absolutely. If the news is about the iphone lost a year ago, and not really a news article but more of a special episode of "where are they now".

  11. Re:Just in case you're wondering about the riot co by oodaloop · · Score: 5, Insightful

    TFS failed to mention that the CEO of the company that lost the iPhone is dead too. Coincidence?

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  12. Google Police Uniforms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I am hoping some photoshop guru will give us an insight in to just what "Google Police" wear for every day uniforms.

    1. Re:Google Police Uniforms? by JustOK · · Score: 1
      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    2. Re:Google Police Uniforms? by CodeheadUK · · Score: 2
  13. Re:Just in case you're wondering about the riot co by someone1234 · · Score: 2

    Several employees of Apple have been reported dead.

    --
    Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
  14. "lost"? No-one believes *that* story anymore! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those are deliberate "leaks". Nothing more!

  15. Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wanna do a press release, do a press release. Stop these faked prototype-lost-in-bar cloak-and-dagger stories. It's not like anyone believes this stuff.

  16. Re:Just in case you're wondering about the riot co by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't really get this either. The guy gets shot while he is in the act of brandishing a weapon against a police officer. Weapon turns out to be loaded and ready to fire. The guy doesn't even suffer any shots that would be otherwise lethal. Yet a riot forms and they spray paint killers on the walls of the police station?

    Weird city. I wonder if they'd prefer having no cops at all. I remember there was some group around Berkley demanding that the city get rid of its police officers, maybe these are them?

    --
    Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
  17. WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, you need riot police, armed with guns... to recover a lost phone prototype...?

    Crazy.

    1. Re:WTF by tuppe666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wait, you need riot police, armed with guns... to recover a lost phone prototype...?

      Crazy.

      Tenuous Link from the article.

      "Shortly after an officer-involved shooting in which a plainclothes officer shot a suspect who pulled a gun on the officer Thursday night, dozens of rioters surrounded San Francisco’s Mission District Police Station while one person vandalized the police station, according to San Francisco police."

      14 people were killed in a cafe suicide bominbg in Somalia too, not sure why Google is not being blamed for than too.

    2. Re:WTF by bobstreo · · Score: 1

      Wait, you need riot police, armed with guns... to recover a lost phone prototype...?

      Crazy.

      Tenuous Link from the article.

      "Shortly after an officer-involved shooting in which a plainclothes officer shot a suspect who pulled a gun on the officer Thursday night, dozens of rioters surrounded San Francisco’s Mission District Police Station while one person vandalized the police station, according to San Francisco police."

      14 people were killed in a cafe suicide bominbg in Somalia too, not sure why Google is not being blamed for than too.

      No, that was just a bad battery on a Surface tablet.

  18. Re:Just in case you're wondering about the riot co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article makes it sound like a plain clothed officer was chasing the guy. I don't know about you, but if some random guy started harassing me on the street and following me when I'm trying to get away from him I'd be concerned. You don't know if a plain clothed officer really is a police officer or just a crazy nut out to mess with people.

  19. Google? Are you sure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you sure it was Google? I thought it would have been Samsung...

    I kid! I kid!

    1. Re:Google? Are you sure? by tuppe666 · · Score: 0

      Are you sure it was Google? I thought it would have been Samsung...

      I kid! I kid!

      You comment makes no sense on so many levels. The main one being the Phone was manufactured by LG...which I think should be bigger news than this trash piece.

  20. A PR Stunt? by Dupple · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Google’s Andy Rubin: ’I’d Be Happy’ If Someone Left Prototype Android Phone In A Bar ‘And Someone Wrote About It’

    http://www.businessinsider.com/googles-andy-rubin-id-be-happy-if-someone-left-prototype-android-phone-in-a-bar-and-someone-wrote-about-it-2010-4#ixzz2ASEIo0n1

    --
    Watch those corners
  21. theooneinthepinkoneinthestink by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    prompting Google to I know this is grammatically wrong but it's like that in the source its security team on 'Sudsy,'

    That doesn't make any sense at all, even by theo's standards.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:theooneinthepinkoneinthestink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Er, that was the one bit of the summary that did make sense.

      sic v.t. followed by on: set (a person) to work on a task; set (a person) to follow, pursue, etc., another.

  22. Re:Just in case you're wondering about the riot co by Megane · · Score: 2

    Including a former CEO.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  23. Also in the news by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Funny

    An Apple spokesperson immediately commented on the incident.

    "I have to inform Google that we will sue for a billion dollars. We have already patented the marketing trick of "losing" phones. We got prior art, dammit!"

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  24. Google taking more ideas from Apple by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    Can't they find new ways to create hype? The should have seen through this and just smashed it and put it in the bin.

  25. Worst Slashdot Summary ever by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 1

    And that is quite a mark for /.

    The police station was "under-siege" (in reality just some protesters and vandals in front of it) for something totally unrelated to the phone (if it is not related to the news, why post it?). And why in the world is relevant that the Apple investigator is now dead? Maybe are they suggesting that Steve Jobs killed him to cover something?

    Future posts I suggest to the /. editors

    • Bloody dictator X uses a Windows 8 tablet.
    • Research discovers that Nazi Germany used phones invented in the USA.
    • Patient Awakens From Comma in Hospital located 2000 KM away from RMS home

    Where is the "Delete my account" button?

    --
    Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
    1. Re:Worst Slashdot Summary ever by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

      I'm telling you, if child handed that mess into their grammar school teacher, it would make their teacher cry.

      --
      You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    2. Re:Worst Slashdot Summary ever by supercrisp · · Score: 0

      Fisting without lube is painful.

  26. Lawsuit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The real question is how long it will take Apple to sue Samsung for having one of their prototypes stolen in the same manner as one of Apple's.

    1. Re:Lawsuit! by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

      The real question is how long it will take Apple to sue Samsung for having one of their prototypes stolen in the same manner as one of Apple's.

      Because the manufacturer is LG....about four weeks.

    2. Re:Lawsuit! by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      The real question is how long it will take Apple to sue Samsung for having one of their prototypes stolen in the same manner as one of Apple's.

      Since it wasn't stolen, but left untouched for a day at a crowded bar - never.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  27. The bartender was giddy at first by bedouin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    . . . but after making a few dozen phone calls realized no one gave a shit, much less was willing to pay money for access to a Google prototype. To compensate for his disappointment, he dicked around with the Google employee.

  28. Re:Dayum... by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

    What is is about telephone prototypes that drives people to drink?

  29. Summary is nonsense by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

    Somebody needs to get a proof read things before they're published.

    I dare you to understand the story based on that summary -- its like random words strung together.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
  30. Just a failed publicity stunt by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

    What's really funny about this is that it's a transparent publicity stunt -- but almost no one in the mainstream press even noticed.

    Even if you're Google, you can't create much buzz about the release of yet another Android phone into an already overcrowded marketplace. It's about as exciting as a new inkjet printer.

    Outside of the nerdosphere, there really isn't a lot of call for a phone that is almost the size of a small tablet . It dwarfs the iPhone 5 shown next to it, and bigger isn't always better in something that is supposed to be portable. Well-heeled consumers can afford both a smartphone and a tablet. They don't need a phone so large that it requires its owner to only buy clothes with massive pockets.

    1. Re:Just a failed publicity stunt by Xacid · · Score: 1

      Almost looks like a publicity stunt. Can't really see why someone would go through the effort of having someone run all around - it's not even that funny.

      Regarding the size of it - I actually don't think I'd mind it, but I typically wear clothes that happen to have large pockets. I'd have to try it out for a while and see if I'd get used to it. Personally I think it'd be kind of sweet to have a phone that could almost be a laptop replacement for all my routine stuff while not destroying my eyes. If only I could get something like this with a keyboard though...

    2. Re:Just a failed publicity stunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm - if that is true, I wonder why Google wants to create the impression it has a security team that is quite happy to pretend to be law enforcement. I would have LOVED to have that conversation - he would have left pretty damn quickly.

      But hey, sending him on a wild goose chase is almost just as good.

    3. Re:Just a failed publicity stunt by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      I don't think it was intended to be funny. I think that it was intended to make people think that there is the same kind of buzz around this phone that there was around the iPhone that was left in the bar. The whole intimidating security routine was all part of the "just like Apple" routine they were doing.

      I'm sure that there are some folks with big pockets that will like the phone, but I just don't see it having the kind of mass appeal that the iPhone does. On the other hand, a huge phone definitely can't be missed on a display filled with normal size phones, so it will get attention at Best Buy.

      I've seen women with hands big enough to hold this phone comfortably. Of course, they used to be men. ;)

      If you can imagine a 4.7" display functioning as a laptop replacement for routine stuff, you've got way better eyes than I have. I go nuts having to work on a laptop with a 13" display.

    4. Re:Just a failed publicity stunt by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      Hmm - if that is true, I wonder why Google wants to create the impression it has a security team that is quite happy to pretend to be law enforcement.

      Because, unlike Apple, they could not get actual law enforcement interested in getting involved. So they needed to do something to add some drama, intrigue, and a sense of danger to the situation.

    5. Re:Just a failed publicity stunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did get them involved, and how!

      ... which landed him in an under-siege SFPD Station, from which he and Sudsy's lawyer had to be escorted out of under the watch of police in full riot gear with automatic weapons so the pair could arrange a 1 a.m. pickup of the phone.

      It's like retrieving super-important diplomatic secrets from the war zone! He should've worn them Google Glasses and streamed everything live. Explosions, gunfire and helicopters can be edited in later.

    6. Re:Just a failed publicity stunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      speaking of, is there a trendy fashion shop in the mission selling massive pockets?

    7. Re:Just a failed publicity stunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess the millions of people who have a Galaxy S3 and a Galaxy Note should return their phones, all because of some random guys on the internet. I know at least one woman who says the SGS3 is the best phone ever, and she's not excessively tall or big.

      You do realize that even the picture you posted ... the N4 and other "large" devices is not very much wider (a few millimeters), and most people's pockets are long enough to accommodate the additional length (barely a centimeter) without poking out. Putting a Nexus 1 (a smaller 3.7 inch screen device) right on top of my Galaxy Nexus (4.7 inch) is not much bigger.

      Fail argument is fail. (Overly excessive description is excessive?)

    8. Re:Just a failed publicity stunt by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      I realize that you are personally invested in seeing this phone succeed, and that you can site some minority of smartphone users who are fine with massive phones, but it doesn't change the fact that my argument is sound. If you want to talk into something the size of a small tablet, I'm not going to stop you, but don't be surprised when Apple outsells it with phone-sized phones.

    9. Re:Just a failed publicity stunt by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      Probably not, people aren't usually willing to replace their wardrobe to accomodate their smart phone.

  31. What the story doesn't say by lord_rob+the+only+on · · Score: 2

    A client (we'll call him Tim C. for anonymity) is said to have thanked the barman for having prevented a bad guy from stealing his new iPhone prototype.

    1. Re:What the story doesn't say by Meski · · Score: 2

      A client (we'll call him Tim C. for anonymity) is said to have cursed foully the barman for having prevented a bad guy from stealing his new iPhone prototype. Tim will bid higher next time... There, fixed it.

  32. Do No Evil by nurb432 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Unless it brings you free press. It was staged, just like the apple incidents were.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  33. Re:Just in case you're wondering about the riot co by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The article makes it sound like a plain clothed officer was chasing the guy. I don't know about you, but if some random guy started harassing me on the street and following me when I'm trying to get away from him I'd be concerned. You don't know if a plain clothed officer really is a police officer or just a crazy nut out to mess with people.

    Yeah, as a gang member on parole I'd certainly pull a gun. What else am I expected to do, ask for ID?

    --
    -- Using the preview button since 2005
  34. Re: summary written by whale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The summary was written by a whale imitating a human moron telling a joke about a phone going into a bar.

  35. Security by fph+il+quozientatore · · Score: 1

    Are these the same Google employees that have the master passwords to read half of the world's e-mail? Just curious...

    --
    My first program:

    Hell Segmentation fault

  36. Re:Summary is nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lol. Classic /. quote:

    Somebody needs to get a proof read things before they're published.

    Also: "it's."

  37. Re:Just in case you're wondering about the riot co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The underlying issue is that the police have lost the trust of people.

  38. Re:Just in case you're wondering about the riot co by SpzToid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One of the officers attempted to talk to one of the two people who ran from police with the officer in pursuit.

    While running, the suspect pulled a gun, later determined to be a TEC-9 pistol, and the officer ordered him to drop the weapon, Andraychak said.

    Instead, the suspect turned toward the officer and began to raise the pistol. The officer feared for his life and shot at the suspect, Andraychak said.

    Police said the suspect was hit twice and was then taken to San Francisco General Hospital where he is being treated for non life-threatening injuries.

    A TEC-9? Seriously, the guy pulls out a loaded TEC-9 and points it, (at anyone?)? I think that is *two* lucky people who both still alive; especially the police officer who had to square off against that thing! Wikipedia it like I did; I'm not going to cite the link for it. Cheers for the cop who seems to have handled the situation well!

    --
    You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
  39. Proof Google is copying Apple by mkraft · · Score: 0

    Does Google need to do everything Apple does?

  40. This wasn't an accident by tarellel · · Score: 0

    This wasn't an accident, why would any major corporation pass up on a free PR opportunity.

    --
    http://theworkaround.com/
  41. The whole thing stinks - Stupid advertising ploy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story is a bunch of bullshit. The fact that we are talking about it says that bullshit sometimes works.

  42. Google Calls Finders-Keepers on Your Stuff by theodp · · Score: 1

    Google TOSWhen you upload or otherwise submit content to our Services, you give Google (and those we work with) a worldwide license to use, host, store, reproduce, modify, create derivative works (such as those resulting from translations, adaptations or other changes we make so that your content works better with our Services), communicate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute such content. The rights you grant in this license are for the limited purpose of operating, promoting, and improving our Services, and to develop new ones. This license continues even if you stop using our Services (for example, for a business listing you have added to Google Maps).

    1. Re:Google Calls Finders-Keepers on Your Stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      > The rights you grant in this license are for the limited purpose of operating, promoting, and improving our Services, and to develop new ones.

      Did you notice this one? Same clause is in every major online services' EULAs, you might check Microsoft's, for example.

      What was your point, except showing that you might have deliberately made the submitted summary misrepresent what exactly happened to show your hate towards Google?

    2. Re:Google Calls Finders-Keepers on Your Stuff by theodp · · Score: 1

      Just thought it was worth pointing out that a company which felt it necessary to send out an investigator to make threats to get its own IP back (rather than waiting until noon the next day) won't ever give others their own IP back. And for a company that helps itself to information that others unintentionally leave out where it can be grabbed - e.g., the Street View and browser privacy bypassing debacles - Google seemed to get overly outraged and aggressive when the shoe was on the other foot and they found their own information carelessly left in the possession of another innocent party. :-)

    3. Re:Google Calls Finders-Keepers on Your Stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, companies get pretty nervous about pre-release leaks - he did sell photos to Wired after all, and no, sending someone from their security team to negotiate the return isn't something extraordinary. Compare and contrast to Apple not just threatening, but indeed sending California police after Gizmodo's editor. That barmen had no more rights to take the phone with him as that editor.

  43. Re:Summary is nonsense by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I was laughing too hard.

    And my comment at least made sense.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
  44. Non story, bad writing by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 5, Informative

    So when you take the drama out of the ridiculous article, here's what you get:

    Dude finds phone. Some drama round giving the phone back,

    Dude finds a phone. Talks to a friend. Friend contacts google. Google wants to get the phone right now, bartender wants to do it next day. Google security dude goes out ot the bar to pick it up. Bartender is out playing a gig somewhere else. Bartender's coworker for some reason tells security dude that bartender is at the police station.

    Security dude goes to police station in the middle of a riot. Calls a random lawyer who gets involved for some reason - or at least makes a statement to Wired.

    Then they meet up and after the security dude proves his ID, bartender returns the phone to him.

    WTF?

    Why was this made to sound like the bar was stormed by Google Secret Service or some such crap?

    1. Re:Non story, bad writing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wired's level of anti-Google, pro-Apple bias is reaching hysterical levels. They have always been a pro-Apple magazine, and theres nothing wrong with that, but lately they have just become completely unfair. They spin any opportunity whatsoever to attack Google and promote Apple at every turn. Literally any Wired story from the last year would provide illustrate my point, but as one example take a recent series of stories they were running on mobile payments and ongoing effort to replace your credit card with your phone. You would think they would mostly be writing about Google Wallet on Android phones, with maybe a secondary talk about Square and whatever the carries are trying to do, right? No, the first article in the series the author spends the entire space promoting passbook and the iPhone, as is a bunch of stupid vouchers has anything at all to do with the huge effort to reshape global commerce by eliminating credit cards (I dont know how to link properly on slashdot but its here: http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2012/09/walletless-week-1/?utm_source=Contextly&utm_medium=RelatedLinks&utm_campaign=MoreRecently). To be fair, she later writes about google wallet in the follow up, but what the fuck was the point of the first article? Reading Wired is like watching an Apple PR video.

  45. This stuff is getting absurd... by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 1

    Why does every situation involving missing prototype phones turn into such a clustastrophuck? Is WWIII gonna be started over the iPhone 7 or something?

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  46. The tables turn by laffer1 · · Score: 2

    After all the Google fan comments about Apple's lost phones, we now have the reverse situation and all the apologists can't fall over themselves fast enough. This is no different than the apple incident. Before you say anything, remember there's two sides to any story.

    This was probably a PR stunt just like the apple incidents. However, I don't think it worked as well simply because most people are not familiar enough with different android devices to know something is a prototype. There are too many android devices to tell the difference between them!

    I think it's fair for every apple fanboy to rail into google fans on this one just because of the BS comments we've seen in the past on slashdot. You guys are just as bad. I'm sure most of this story is not true, but I don't believe the apple stories 100% either. If google pulls this one more time, everything will be even. :)

  47. Re:Just in case you're wondering about the riot co by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The police in the bay area have become increasingly heavy-handed and more than a bit trigger-happy over the last few years. And the public has been responding by an increasing withdrawal of their trust and goodwill.

    Johannes Mehserle, and the pittance of a slap on the wrist "punishment" for his murder of Oscar Grant*, for example, probably set relations between the police and the black community back by a good decade or so alone. Then, for an encore, they went about gunning down a mentally ill homeless man on a different BART platform, shooting an Iraq war veteran in the head with a tear gas canister during the occupy protests, and switching off telephone and internet service... something that you expect in North Korea or middle-eastern theocracies and dictatorships, not the United States... to suppress speech and communication during another protest (of the aforementioned killing of the mentally-ill homeless man). These sorts of things are not exactly going to engender trust or goodwill, especially amongst minorities or otherwise marginalized communities.

    (* Yes, I know, Oscar Grant was kind of a scumbag. That's not relevant though. This is the United States. We're just not supposed to *DO* summary executions here... at all And being a scumbag doesn't change the fact that Grant was unarmed, unresisting, and lying prone and motionless when Mehserle decided to shoot him in the back.)

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  48. Freedom to lose phones by republicancaranalogy · · Score: 0

    Imagine if you went into a bar and left your car there and then 2 hours later you realized you had left your car there but the barman did not want to give you back your car and you were in Canada so you couldn't shoot the bastard. This is what these jokers want from us. If we stop here we'll have no freedom left. Imagine if your phone was a car and every time you used it the government wanted you to vote for them and then the goverments just get bigger until there's notthing but government around here. This is what these jokers want from us.

  49. Re:Just in case you're wondering about the riot co by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    See, this is exactly the problem when people blow a gasket when they see an "assault weapon", You take a look at a picture of a TEC-9 and say "Oohh. that is a nasty-looking weapon". It's not, it just looks that way. It looks like a military style machine gun, but isn't. It's a semi-automatic pistol that shoots the exact same 9mm rounds in the same way that the police handguns do. In fact most police use 40cal rounds that are actually larger and more deadly nowadays. So-called "assault weapons" are simply pistols with slightly larger magazines. The reason they were made and got popular is they are inexpensive to manufacture, before all the bans, restrictions, and hoopla they cost about half of what a regular handgun cost because they are made of stamped steel rather than precision machined parts. They hold about 25 rounds, while the police guns hold 18, so for the fact that it holds 7-10 more bullets than a normal looking pistol, these weapons have been vilified and unjustly singled out. This is complete nonsense. This is also why after the initial knee-jerk reaction by the anti-gun nuts to ban them, most of the bans are not being renewed or allowed to sunset. People are starting to realize these legal, semi-automatic weapons aren't really any different than conventional pistols, save a few physical features.

    That said, the guy is a moron for carrying ANY gun when on probation, and he's damn lucky the cop was a good shot and quick-thinking so they are both still alive to tell the tale.

    --
    -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
  50. The bartender did not own the phone. 'Finders-keep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The bartender did not own the phone. 'Finders-keepers' is NOT the law. The opposite in fact."

    IANAL, although I daydream a lot of the time that I know the law....

    Another reason it doesn't belong to the bartender. If property is lost or left unclaimed on private property, and the owner can't be found, the new owner is not the employee bartender, but the business owner or the property owner.

    Maybe the bartender's boss should the guy for trying to 'steal' his, the bar owner's found cell phone.

    Regarding "the owner can't be found," if you find anything over a certain value you are supposed to turn it over the local police. If they can't find the owner in a certain time, then it's yours. The details vary in different jurisdictions.

  51. Who to blame? by mschaffer · · Score: 1

    At least with Apple, we knew who the ass abusing power was. Who at Google demanded the crackdown on Sudsy?

  52. Re:Just in case you're wondering about the riot co by DCFusor · · Score: 2

    Yup. I own a shooting range. Some kid brought a tec-9 to shoot, he bought it because it looked good on TV. Not a very scary gun as these things go. The kid was a decent shot with other guns, but with this one? At 10 paces he had trouble hitting a 30 gal water heater tank once between jams. My results weren't much better, and I'm an often-winning competitive shooter. I'd never own such a piece of crap myself.

    --
    Why guess when you can know? Measure!
  53. It looks like a PR Stunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why didn't Google design an app/tool that renders the prototype unusable if it is reported stolen/lost?

  54. Time for Apple to sue Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google is clearly copycatting Apple's iPhone PR strategy verbatim.

  55. This sounds like a joke... by BevanFindlay · · Score: 1

    "An iPhone and a Nexus 4 walk into a bar..."

    So what's the punchline?

    1. Re:This sounds like a joke... by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      Take a little more from TFA and you get even better possibilities...

      An iPhone and a Nexus 4 walk into a bar in San Francisco...

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
  56. 'Tyrell Corporation were unavailable for comment.' by extar · · Score: 1

    You Nexus, huh? I design your eyes.

  57. Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So this is the same louse at Apple who 'lost' two iPhone prototypes before Apple showed him the door.

    Looks like Google needs to show him the door, and quick.

  58. Re:Summary is nonsense by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

    Somebody needs to get a proof read things before they're published.

    Maybe someday /. will become big enough to hire some editors.

    --
    'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
  59. Re:Just in case you're wondering about the riot co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be fair the officer should actually be required to the shooting range. Lethal force was required and the officer wasn't effective in that one.

  60. Secret prototype does not belong in drinking hole by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    I dunno about you, but if my company assigns me a top secret prototype I would not bring it to a bar, or a pub, or a nightclub, or a karaoke lounge, or any place near where people are drinking alcohol and getting drunk.

    It's known as common sense.

    It's also about responsibility - that I'm responsible for my action.

    This "lost prototype phone in bar" scene had happened twice to Apple and once to Google.

    I hope, from now on, tech companies will learn from this and institute a STRICT RULE prohibiting employees to bring valuable company assets to bars or pubs - and if violation continues, said company could be fired, and then sued, for breach of trust.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  61. Re:Just in case you're wondering about the riot co by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

    I'm having a hard time believing that the cops are the instigators. I've heard what goes on in San Jose for example, when a local sports team wins a game. Bonfires in the middle of the street and destruction of private property aren't uncommon.

    I can't think of any sane reason that the general populace would be this way, except maybe one. I keep hearing this fear mongering about people owning assault rifles and politicians wanting to ban them, yet statistics have always shown that the more you restrict the ownership of firearms, the higher the rate of weapons violations. DC saw a 25% decrease in firearms offenses after SCOTUS ruled their restrictions were unconstitutional. Chicago has some of the tightest firearms laws in the US, yet their crime rate per capita is more than double that of Phoenix, which has some of the most lax weapons laws in the US (anybody can conceal carry - no permit required, although they are available if desired.)

    California has a ton of firearm restrictions (though not quite as bad as Chicago.) Are we seeing a pattern yet? Harvard Law does:

    http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol30_No2_KatesMauseronline.pdf

    Also note that everywhere in the world where firearm ownership is reduced, murder rates AND suicides go up. US vs Europe is an anomaly, because its murder rates were very high, high even before Europe started restricting the ownership of firearms, as noted by Harvard. When people say guns are the reason America has more murders, that isn't accurate at all. Look at Canada for example, whose laws are very similar to ours, yet their murder rates are similar to Europe. Also note that in England, police don't investigate burglary and minor assaults unless they catch the perp in the act, and even then they often let them go with a warning and no prosecution. So you get crime rates reported lower than they actually are.

    --
    Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
  62. Re:Secret prototype does not belong in drinking ho by Nikker · · Score: 1

    They lost it just weeks before release date, not some 3-5 year in the future prototype.

    This is just a PR stunt, it's OK, all will be well.

    --
    A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
  63. Re:Secret prototype does not belong in drinking ho by KingMotley · · Score: 1

    Taken completely out of context.

    These phones are meant to iron out any issues that may arise during normal usage. Such as well, "holding it wrong", lol. How would you like to get your brand new phone only to realize that it shatters if you place it down on a laquer coated table top, like a bar typically has, or that reception inside most buildings is terrible because they decided to never take it outside of the lab?

    I hope, from now on, tech companies will learn from this and institute a STRICT RULE demanding employees to bring prototypes with them on their everyday activities to ensure when they are released they work as advertised.

  64. Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't there a story not long ago about an iPhone proto lost in a bar? What is it with bars and smartphone prototypes? :p

  65. I'm done. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's it, I'm done here. I re-read that summary three times. As 'cool' as Slashdot is, I think I'm never coming back after this one.

  66. How much did they pay the bar for publicity stunt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm wondering how much they had to pay the bar in Google shares for this obvious publicity stunt?