Slashdot Mirror


Camera Technique Captures New View of Space & Time

kkleiner writes "What if you could compress a video clip into a single image? That's what Jay Mark Johnson, an artist and visual effects director, has accomplished through the use of a special camera technique. He calls the images 'photographic timelines,' and his collected works offer quite a shift to conventional perception. Slices of photos are strung together in progression to make a single composite image of a sliver of space spread over an extended period of time."

48 of 75 comments (clear)

  1. GIF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "What if you could compress a video clip into a single image? "

    you get a GIF.

    1. Re:GIF by SuperMooCow · · Score: 1

      Why was PNG finally able to replace GIF but MNG failed to replace the animated GIF?

    2. Re:GIF by dmbasso · · Score: 1

      It is strange how terminology is formed... now 'image' is synonymous to 'static visual image' in computational contexts. In neurosciences it may refer to other modalities, such as 'sound images', or 'tactile images'.
      But that's the beauty of language, it is alive.

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    3. Re:GIF by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      because animated .PNG is a thing, and people are to lazy to change the way the do things.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    4. Re:GIF by Teancum · · Score: 1

      The early animated GIF images really was the only way to effectively perform any sort of animation when they originally came out, thus they got widespread browser and editor support. The MNG file format instead came much later... after there were other alternatives such as motion JPEG, and especially the ubiquitous Microsoft AVI format not to mention Quicktime, Real Media, and MPEG that were all coming out at about the same time. While MNG wasn't really trying to get into the video format business (IMHO a failure of imagination of the group putting together MNG too) those alternate video formats really ended up taking over what niches were left for the MNG format.

      And then ultimately by the time MNG was finalized and in a position to be readily accepted, the LZW patent (or at least the one being pushed by Unisys) expired so people who really wanted to use the GIF file format could do so without worrying about royalty payments... the thing that really pushed the PNG file format forward in a huge way.

      The one niche application that MNG could have done is video (with multiplexed audio), but that "open source and royalty free" application has been taken over by the Ogg file format and thus is relegated to the file format backwater. Some web browsers do support MNG files and some of the chunks can be read by software supporting the PNG format, so it isn't a total waste. Still, it is only a niche application that doesn't offer much of an improvement over other competing animation file formats.

    5. Re:GIF by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      But that's the beauty of language, it is alive.

      Aw, man, you missed the opportunity for a joke. Tomorrow's Halloween. It's.... aliiiiIIIIIVE!!!!

  2. $85000 camera? by dalias · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Pretty sad that it took an $85000 camera to do the same thing you could do with any video camera and a few hundred lines of code...

    1. Re:$85000 camera? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Looks like the same technique they use to take horse race photo finishes.

    2. Re:$85000 camera? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      OK, you first.

    3. Re:$85000 camera? by fragfoo · · Score: 1

      Pretty sad that it took an $85000 camera to do the same thing you could do with any video camera and a few hundred lines of code...

      Or about 3 lines if you use OpenCV.

      --
      Sig? Heil
    4. Re:$85000 camera? by Pedant · · Score: 1

      With a cheap video camera, he could make videos with the space and time axes swapped.

    5. Re:$85000 camera? by JazzHarper · · Score: 1

      There's an app for that. $1.99 at iTunes.

    6. Re:$85000 camera? by grumbel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hundred? Try two:

      mplayer -vo jpeg -vf "crop=$WIDTH:$HEIGHT:$X:$Y" -ss "$STARTPOS" -endpos "$DURATION" "$VIDEOFILE"
      montage -geometry "${WIDTH}x${HEIGHT}" -tile x1 *.jpg "$OUTFILE"

      Set WIDTH to 1 and HEIGHT to the size of the video file. (Warning: will spam the current directory with a whole bunch of jpegs).

    7. Re:$85000 camera? by tsa · · Score: 1

      Yes, I also don't see what's new here.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    8. Re:$85000 camera? by bandy · · Score: 1

      Because people have no sense of history. Instagram isn't (necessarily) cross-processing. Most of the effects just make photos look as if you've stored them in sunlight for a few years. Photos back then didn't look like that - they were a bit grainier than what we expect now, but they certainly didn't look washed out.

      --
      "You might as well get your son a ticket to hell as give him a five string banjo." -unknown minister
    9. Re:$85000 camera? by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 1

      Handy!

      I wrote a slightly longer script to do the same (in PHP, stop laughing) to do some large-scale 'scanning' from public transit in Seattle. Firstly, I need a camera with a higher framerate (60fps isn't really enough) and secondly, I need to lock exposure, white balance and so on. But the very first attempt turned out quite well.

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    10. Re:$85000 camera? by Rotaluclac · · Score: 1

      And photo finishes of a rowing race.

      As far as I know, this type of equipment exists for at least 30 years. It's called a line camera.

    11. Re:$85000 camera? by kramulous · · Score: 1

      Yeah? What would those three lines of code be exactly? Time to put your money where your mouth is.

      --
      .
    12. Re:$85000 camera? by dalias · · Score: 1

      No need for ImageMagick. MPlayer has its own tile filter.

  3. Not New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    They have been doing this for years... Go look at the "photo finish" of any horse race to see the same effect.

    1. Re:Not New by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      Even worse, it shows that many people aren't actually exposed to x-t diagrams in high school physics, otherwise they wouldn't be able to come up with the silly idea that they actually invented something new.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Not New by Kjellander · · Score: 1

      Totally Agree. Also, my students used to do this as an art project 7 years ago. They did nice slices through a whole football (non-american) game.

    3. Re:Not New by Sqr(twg) · · Score: 1

      ...or Google "slit scan camera". There's a smartphone app for this.

  4. Slit Scan Photography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I believe we've called this "slit-scan" photography and it's been in use for just about as long as there have been cameras. In fact, this can be seen as an undesired effect called "rolling shutter" in CMOS cameras, just taken to an extreme.

    Anyone interested in this topic should really check out the work done by Amnon Owed and Processing (processing.org):
    http://amnonp5.wordpress.com/2011/01/16/eternalism-the-art-of-slitscanning/

    1. Re:Slit Scan Photography by MangoCats · · Score: 1

      But, the point is, he's an artist and his stuff looks cool... it's not his fault he was raised under a rock and rediscovered the wheel a century after its invention.

  5. Re:A movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    She's split into pieces because she was in different places at different times when the vertical line was being sampled. Sometimes she was moving through that slit, and sometimes she was not.

  6. Photo Finish by Lev13than · · Score: 5, Informative

    In other words, he's using a slit camera to make photo finish images (but with the subject something other than finish lines). Technology is being repurposed for a potentially interesting effect, but not technically revolutionary.

    --
    When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
    1. Re:Photo Finish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've seen this being re-purposed for "art" before too, and even back then the artist/ audience realized it wasn't that great. This guy hasn't done anything innovative since then....other than with digital gear?

      The images are still uninspiring. I wish I could name the artist who did this in the 70s.... maybe he was a photojournalist for the AP.

    2. Re:Photo Finish by jovius · · Score: 1

      Yeah, an interesting and unique artistic application of the tech. There's a preset example in Processing (Library/Capture/SlitScan) which one can use to create custom slit scans from live video or movement. It's widely used as the basis for such projects, and there are many examples on YouTube.

      I've seen one piece where the slit scan was created in sort of 3D and the depth of the image captured the different time frames. The frames could be revealed at any point and sort of dug and sliced into, but that was many years ago and can't remember who it was...

  7. Old News from 1992 or earlier by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    http://cs.iupui.edu/~jzheng////RP/index.html
    "A route panorama captures and displays miles of scenes along a route optimized to use as little data as possible. It captures scenes with a slit in the frame of a camera moving along a certain route. This presentation details new techniques which do not require image stitching and thus simplifies the input process."

  8. The only way I can look at these by istartedi · · Score: 1

    The only way I can look at these is to think, "what moves is what matters", and "what matters most gets squished". There's some aesthetic amusement when I don't think about it too. The chopped up dancer is... well... interesting. I'm not ready to order framed prints though. It might be interesting to play with the "what matters" and "what matters most gets... " parameters. Oh, and the first one is confusing until you realize it's not a short movie taken at one time. It had to be at least two short movies, because of the way the shadows are.... right?

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  9. Been done by stewsters · · Score: 1

    What if you could compress a video clip into a single image? - Animated Gif.

  10. What's "news" about this? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
    It's called a streak camera and it has been done for decades. It's used not only for photo finishes of almost every race that has a photo-finish capability, but it was done decades ago in atomic spectroscopy as a detector for spark and arc spectrometers. And it's done on a daily basis for many other sciences, like studying waves running up the beach. (I'd give a link but I don't want to /. the site.)

    Hell, there's even an app for that on the new iphone. All it takes is a simple video camera and a few lines (not even hundreds) of code (pull the middle five columns out of a video stream and put them next to each other in a bigger image. Rotate the camera at some rate. Or move the object past the camera. Streak cameras move the film to do the same thing with a fixed camera position.)

  11. its called slit scan and its not at all new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://www.flong.com/texts/lists/slit_scan/
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slit-scan_photography
    http://seriss.com/people/erco/2001/

  12. I don't get it? by gth740k · · Score: 1

    To me, the images seem more like abstract art (which I generally don't connect with) than a revolutionary camera technique.

  13. does anyone else think... by roc97007 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...that some of the images look like an updated game of Frogger?

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  14. Post Processing by Dan+East · · Score: 1

    I don't see why this can't be done by post-processing a video (as long as the camera doesn't move, pan or zoom). It's unique that it can be done with a specialized camera, but I don't think that is necessary.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  15. David Hockney by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

    David Hockney has been making art by slicing together stills to create the impression of a motion event for years. And frankly, his results are a lot more "artistic" that this mechanised and rather dull-lloking technique.

  16. Re:Old News from 1912 or earlier by oodaloop · · Score: 1

    This painting, and the photo/video by which it was inspired, were my first thoughts as well.

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  17. Not new at all by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

    This isn't new. And it's also not as interesting as this.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  18. Re:Old News from 1912 or earlier by grumbel · · Score: 1

    That's different, as that's just overlapping all the frames. The fun part with slitscan is that you only expose a single vertical line and don't overlap anything. That way the x-axis ends up capturing time, not space, which leads to quite a few interesting and unintuitive results.

  19. Science? by nekad · · Score: 1

    Why is this article tagged as science? An attempt at shoehorning general relativity is made in the article. Other than that, it is not news worthy under the umbrella of science.

  20. AKA BLUR by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    This. I had this down pat with my Kodak Brownie 110 in 1982! Fuck's sake...!

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    1. Re:AKA BLUR by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      mod parent up, that's just too damn funny! Extra karma for a Groening reference. Oh, shame, you posted AC! :D

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  21. It's an old story in Art too by Kittenman · · Score: 1

    A few years back I was in the Sistine chapel (I'm an art-lover: so shoot me). There's some stuff on the wall that tells bible stories in art. Example (I'm making this up, as I can't remember but do remember the technique) Moses on the mountain, getting the commandments from the man upstairs. Moses coming down the mountain, seeing the wild party, Moses smashing the tablets... each vignette has Moses in in at a different time in the story, but in the same painting. He's dressed identically, surrounded by the same people. He might be on the road, top right, then on the same road, middle centre.

    So yeah, done before - in the renaissance.

    --
    "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
  22. This might not be new! by dohzer · · Score: 3

    Hey guys, I think this technique may already exist.
    I'm just going by the fact that fifteen other people have independently pointed out the same thing.

    1. Re:This might not be new! by ishmaiel · · Score: 1

      I've been doing it for a large number of seconds - HDTR