Slashdot Mirror


Kim Dotcom Outs Mega Teaser Site, Finalizes Domain Name

hypnosec writes "Kim Dotcom has let out more information about the launch of Megaupload's successor Mega, which he claims will be 'bigger, better, faster, stronger, [and] safer.' Mega is currently looking for partners willing to provide servers, support and connectivity to become 'Mega Storage Nodes.' The prime requirement, according to Dotcom, is that the servers should be located outside the U.S. and that the companies should also be based outside of the U.S. For this reason, Dotcom has decided that the new service will be launching with 'Me.ga' domain name."

46 of 195 comments (clear)

  1. Have to say... by santax · · Score: 3, Interesting

    He has pretty big balls. I wish him all the best. But this time, I hope he will build a safe-room, in a safe-room because this is going to upset a lot of tier 1 criminals, eh businesspeople.

    1. Re:Have to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Somebody has been playing a lot of minecraft

    2. Re:Have to say... by MoaDweeb · · Score: 4, Funny

      He DID have a safe room and went and hid. The Police enticed him out later with candy bars and threats.

      --
      New Zealanders are well balanced with a chip on each shoulder. One represents Australia, the other the rest of the world
    3. Re:Have to say... by nullchar · · Score: 2

      Why don't you purchase one of these properties?

  2. Looking forward to downloading warez & pr0n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Kim,

    Thanks for fighting the good fight.

    Yes!

  3. How long until: by ledow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "The domain name associated with the website Me.ga has been seized pursuant to an order issued by the U.S. District Court"

    (or equivalent).

    1. Re:How long until: by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Funny

      And the more important question: will he be changing his name to Kim Dotga?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:How long until: by ledow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, the US would never interfere in foreign countries where they have no jurisdiction to get their hands on a suspected copyright-infringer, would they?

      Gabon looks like just the kind of place that a little backhander and/or exchange of oil purchases could make anything happen.

    3. Re:How long until: by SuricouRaven · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In theory, yes - though it'd take some time to be implimented. It'd be a big step though, as it would undermine all trust in the DNS system, and that is something the US can't afford to do right now. The UN is already pressing for a more multinational management - an abuse of power by the US would only prove them right.

    4. Re:How long until: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The .ga TLD is operated by Gabon Telecom SA, which is owned by Maroc Telecom, which is owned by Vivendi SA.

  4. It should be obvious whos internet will win. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And its not going to be "America's" internet.

    We are going back to our old ways of isolating ourselves from the world because of the greed of a very few.

    While Kim may be greedy and potentially an asshole, he's going to win and is playing by rules far more legitimate then our current IP circus.

    To those of you in the MPAA, RIAA, and software, mobile phone, and ISP industries. You cannot fight this. Learn and adapt or you will fail while people like Kim refuse to lay down and prosper.

    1. Re:It should be obvious whos internet will win. by misexistentialist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not like the governments of other countries are enthusiastic about an open internet.

    2. Re:It should be obvious whos internet will win. by PraiseBob · · Score: 4, Interesting

      While Kim may be greedy and potentially an asshole, he's going to win and is playing by rules far more legitimate then our current IP circus.

      Except he had his personal assets seized, his companys assets destroyed, and is facing huge legal fees along with possible extradition and decades of prison time. You say he will win the legal battle, but everything done to him so far has been illegal and yet it was still done. The forces working against him don't really care about following legal procedure, they care about ruining his life. And anybody who wants to follow his business models certainly has to carefully consider how much of their own life they are putting at risk by going against the current IP circus. Or take a look at the guys from Pirate Bay, locked in cages in solitary confinement. Are they winning the fight?

      I'm all for a more open internet, but your viewpoint is full of idealistic assumptions that are by no means assured.

    3. Re:It should be obvious whos internet will win. by houghi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To those of you in the MPAA, RIAA, and software, mobile phone, and ISP industries. You cannot fight this.

      Sure they can fight this. They have been fighting since Gutenberg. OK, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_copyright_law says :
      Pope Alexander VI issued a bull in 1501 against the unlicensed printing of books.
      And :
      Popes conceded at different times to certain printers the exclusive privilege of printing for specific terms (rarely exceeding 14 years)
      That is 50 years after Gutenberg started printing.

      So don't say they can't fight it. They have been fighting it for a LOT longer then you and me are around and they will continue fighting it.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    4. Re:It should be obvious whos internet will win. by xigxag · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately they can fight it, and have continued to fight even after the death of megaupload. Almost every filesharing service which was predominant two years ago has folded or has severely tightened its policies. Almost none of them now accept paypal; you have to pay with a credit card or wire transfer using some dodgy offshore middleman.

      And once "me.ga" is deemed an outlaw business by the USA, then subscribing to the service, or advertising on the service, or linking to the service will be considered "terrorism" or "money laundering" or some other highly criminal activity. So, Kim Dotcom's new service might prosper, but it will not be something that American citizens will be able to share in. We'll still be held hostage by the MAFIAA, as usual.

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    5. Re:It should be obvious whos internet will win. by runeghost · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wanting to get paid for your work is not greedy. Charging many multiples of a product's 'fair market value' by leveraging legislative or other control channels you possess (aka. rent extraction), or preventing people from legally-mandated fair access to content they have bought and paid for, is both greedy and wicked.

      The public does not make nice distinctions between "oh, the restrictions on this IP here are pretty reasonable while those on that IP over there are just crazy". To the vast majority of people, IP and copyright are fungible concepts that do not vary from one product or author to another. Most readers had a very good idea of what was fair (checking out a book from a library, lending it to a friend, selling it to a used bookstore) and what wasn't (printing copies of books and selling them for personal profit, stealing ideas or entire texts without attribution). Those institutions that dominated the IP regime in the United States for decades (the MPAA and the RIAA, among others) decided that they were going to play hardball and lock things down so hard that people should consider themselves fortunate to be allowed to read their own books or listen to their own music. They lost. And then they doubled-down and lost again, and again and again. Now that they've finally screwed themselves (and the basic idea of Intellectual Property among a whole generation) to the point where they can see their own deaths approaching, NOW they're suddenly crying, "Omg! Won't someone think of the poor IP creators?". (The IP creators who the corporations screw over every chance they get.)

      Too bad. They blew it. Do I feel bad for those talented folks who are going to find it difficult or impossible to make a living on their work? Do I mourn the creations that might have been but now never will be? Absolutely. But the bloated corporate monstrosities that killed the very of idea of decent copyright? They can burn, and when they run up to me begging, I may laugh, but I certainly won't put the fire out, not even if it gives me a chance to piss on them.

      I'll just leave your false equivalence between digital and physical goods to lie there and rot, as it deserves.

    6. Re:It should be obvious whos internet will win. by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's a very Machiavellian philosophy, tantamount to Realpolitik. Realpolitik is why the USA supported so many corrupt dictators and bloody warlords during the Cold War. We looked the other way when they committed human rights abuses and atrocities, because they were seen as a stabilizing influence and loyal anti-communists.

      Yes, the US is embarking on another campaign to piss off the planet by causing trouble in other countries to push their agenda. We were willing to abandon all our principles when it came to fighting communism. Then again with the war on drugs. And again with the war on terrorism. And again with the war for IP. It's one of those cases where the slippery slope really did happen. If you told someone 100 years ago that the US would be spending trillions to push the corporate agenda of corporations that own nothing but ideas and sell nothing but 1s and 0s, they'd have laughed at you, and if you persisted in telling that correct future, then you'd likely have had part of your brain removed to shut up your insane rants. After all, the government isn't there to fight foreign wars for oil, or make marijuana illegal because the cotton industry found it a threat. Oh wait, it is, and it has. Too late. The only fix is a revolution, and the fat lazy American's are too happy with their bread and circuses.

    7. Re:It should be obvious whos internet will win. by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      But don't imagine for a moment that any other nation would do better.

      I moved out of the US because it's broken. I moved to a place that doesn't do this. There are nations out there that are better. Not everyone was founded on the purityranical foundations of the US where there's an immense fear that someone, somewhere is doing something we don't approve of, and we must stop them, or we passively endorse the act in question. We've alreade done that with Cuba and sex, I'm surprised we haven't done that for drugs. It's illegal to fly to someplace with a consent age below 18 to have sex with someone under 18, even if no laws are broken in that country and it would have been legal in the US. It's illegal to leave the US to perform a legal act because we wouldn't want to be seen to encouraging illegal acts when no illegal acts were committed.

  5. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's funny. He feels the same way about you, and he doesn't even know you exist.

  6. Re:Ugh by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sick of hearing about the US projecting its bad laws outside its jurisdiction.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  7. Oblig Futurama by Revotron · · Score: 4, Funny

    "You can't shut us down. The internet is about the free exchange and sale of other people's ideas!"

  8. US IP Laws by spottedkangaroo · · Score: 2

    Seems like our IP laws are really helping our industries right now. Soon all data centers will be located out of the reach of *AA ?

    --
    Imagine if you weren't allowed to use roads because a bus company complained about your driving 3 times. --skunkpussy
    1. Re:US IP Laws by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seems like our IP laws are really helping our industries right now. Soon all data centers will be located out of the reach of *AA ?

      Out of reach? Given the way the US is exporting its IP laws with some serious diplomatic pressure ... if SOCOM can rustle up someone to go in and do a raid where they're not supposed to be, I wouldn't put that past the influence of the *AAs.

      American foreign policy is in large part driven by what those guys want. To the point that documents written by industry are part of governmental briefings -- even if the conclusions in the document is entirely in the service of the interests of the *AAs.

      Welcome to the oligarchy. It's hard not to come to the conclusion that it's the industry calling the shots, not the government.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  9. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Well you're doing it to your self as the summary makes no referance to the ongoing legal case.

  10. Gabon .ga registry problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm really not sure that .ga (Gabon) was the best choice - see: http://www.internetnews.me/2012/01/13/is-the-gabon-registry-offline/

  11. Oh look he wants investors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Looks like yet another classic Kim Dotcom scam.

    This guy isn't an internet hero, he is a piece of shit.

    1. Re:Oh look he wants investors by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Informative

      Whoever wins, we win.

      Not even slightly.

      It's a normal asshole verses one of the biggest douche-bags of all time.

      It's clearly better for the MPAA to loose because they are much much worse.

      Anyway, is he an asshole? I had a paid up megaupload account which I only used for legal stuff. It worked really well.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  12. Re:Ugh by BetterSense · · Score: 5, Interesting

    According the the article I read in my dead-tree Wired issue, plus speculation, the new service is going to be fully encrypted, forcing all users to encrypt their uploads so that the upload service itself cannot see what the content on its severs is, and so they have total plausible deniability, with the added bonus that the government also can't find clear-text data on their servers to incriminate them with.

    This might also allow you and your trusted friends to upload anything you want, and megaupload/your ISP/the government cannot then bust you for copyright infringement or whatever, for the practical reason that they don't know what the data is. Of course this is possible now with current technology, but a cloud storage service with a good user interface with this feature 'built-in' and mandatory might be what it takes to get ordinary people to encrypt their content. Imagine Dropbox with mandatory encryption. True cypherpunks would argue that everything should have always been like this anyway.

    Of course, Big Content doesn't roll over for such technicalities so I expect this to simply spawn more anti-cryptography laws.

  13. Re:Ugh by funwithBSD · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just wait until it is the UN dictating the rules.

    They are already lining up "blasphemy" laws restricting free speech and eyeballing a global Internet Tax.

    --
    Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
  14. [US] is not safe for ... any business by mounthood · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From the page on server limitations:

    Unfortunately we can't work with hosting companies based in the United States. Safe harbour for service providers via the Digital Millenium Copyright Act has been undermined by the Department of Justice with its novel criminal prosecution of Megaupload. It is not safe for cloud storage sites or any business allowing user generated content to be hosted on servers in the United States or on domains like .com / .net. The US government is frequently seizing domains without offering service providers a hearing or due process.

    When people ask "why use me.ga?" they're going to hear the Kim DotCom story. Eventually it'll be taken for granted that Hollywood has corrupted the Justice Department. This could be the PR move that turns ordinary people against Hollywood.

    --
    tomorrow who's gonna fuss
  15. Re:Ugh by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's a procedure to follow, though. Anti-crypto laws are tricky things to get through politically. Doable, but it needs a good excuse, and 'Hollywood isn't rich enough' is not going to do it easily. The obvious justification is child porn. The mere suspicion of child pornography is toxic today, and any acts justified as opposing child porn are near-impossible to argue against without being branded a pedophile-enabler.

  16. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Imagine Dropbox with mandatory encryption. True cypherpunks would argue that everything should have always been like this anyway.

    There are reasons why this isn't the default -- Dropbox relies on de-duplication to reduce their storage and bandwith costs.
    Encrypting the data before upload would remove that possibility.
    Not that it's not worth doing -- but it will be more expensive than a non-secure equivalent.

  17. Huh... by koan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I get the feeling the RIAA, MPAA and the rest of the anti-piracy morons are holding us back, dragging us down.

    At some point I stop caring about your "intellectual property" and "media licenses" and long for you to disappear.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  18. re: encryption and legislation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I just pointed out to a friend of mine in I.T., last week, that it seems odd how U.S. govt. largely forgot about their interest in controlling encryption. I mean, it wasn't THAT long ago that they were still forcing Microsoft to make a separate version of Internet Explorer because it was a federal crime to export it with 128-bit encryption capabilities in it. And remember how worked up they got over the Pretty Good Privacy software when it was first released to the public?

    But despite CPUs getting many times more powerful and the "common man" encrypting things with 1024 bit encryption in many cases as default settings in programs, you don't really hear a peep out of govt. about it these days.

    I have to assume this means they're capable of breaking it on-demand, so they're happy to let people use the stuff freely and get a false sense of security. Maybe there's a back-door or flaw in the math the NSA knows about, or they simply have such massive super-computer data centers at their disposal now, they can brute force break it? I don't know ... but it's HIGHLY unusual for government to just quit concerning itself with something it was really paranoid about just years earlier, when it purports to make sure they can't view the contents of communications between people.

  19. Re:Ugh by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sure, the MAFIAA can trawl file sharing sites and get the password to the key. But they can't trace it back to who uploaded it, so they can't sue you. And Mega can't know that you've posted the key, so Mega can't know what's in the encrypted file. So they can't sue Mega either.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  20. Re:Ugh by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

    Why would he be re-launching his site (the explicit topic at hand)? I'll give you a hint, it' because the US projected it's power outside its jurisdiction.

    Meh, the Internet will just route around the damage. The problem is that the "damage" is the USA.

  21. Re:Wheres the old stuff going? by Spy+Handler · · Score: 2

    Carpathia still has the warez on their servers. Which are still frozen by DoJ.

    http://www.gamepolitics.com/2012/10/05/report-seized-megaupload-data-be-subject-future-us-court-hearing

  22. Domain name/public internet access by nurb432 · · Score: 2

    Is the wrong way to go. It provides several points of failure that are hard to get around, and has proven to be vulnerable time and time again as we lose sites like Demonoid and Library.nu ( and countless others before them ).

    Best bet is to go underground with something like Freenet or I2P. Sure, it may not be as 'transparent', but that is fixable by creating brain dead installers and multiple public access points. ( then you play whack-a-mole as those are shut down ). The days of the 'open net' is limited.

    This way there is nothing specific to shut down.

    Of course if there is a money trail, and there will be with Kim, that is still vulnerable.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Domain name/public internet access by kenorland · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Kim DotCom cannot get rich with Freenet or other such technologies. Whatever he (or anybody else) comes up with as a business automatically has a single point of failure: the people running it.

  23. Re:Ugh by Abreu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's funny how right wingers in the USA seem to think the United Nations is all-powerful.

    Guys, the UN has no power whatsoever, it cannot dictate laws to member states, much less enforce them.

    --
    No sig for the moment.
  24. Re:Ugh by EdIII · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem is that the "damage" is the USA.

    HARDLY

    The USA is not alone in this bullshit by any stretch. There are just as many problems in the EU right now. ALL governments right now are corrupt and owned by very powerful groups with intense interests in protecting the revenue from their copyrights.

    Nobody wants to change, and there are a bunch of rent seeking sociopaths that are trying to kill freedom as quickly as possible, because it is the most direct route to having the control required to protect their business models and assets.

    To say it is the USA only, gives a huge pass to those governments in the EU.

  25. Re:Ugh by kenorland · · Score: 2

    Guys, the UN has no power whatsoever, it cannot dictate laws to member states, much less enforce them.

    There are tons of bad treaties that come out of the UN and that are nearly impossible for member nations to leave. For example, the US couldn't legalize drugs however much it may want to. These treaties often represent policy laundering and are imposed undemocratically by the executive branch. Furthermore, the UN has something much stronger than military, namely the power to punish states through trade penalties, and those penalties are imposed on any nation that steps out of line, including the US.

    The UN isn't all powerful, but it is also far from powerless. And we should never forget that the UN is not a democracy and has no moral authority; the majority of its members are undemocratic or worse. The UN is merely a body where states can try to work out their differences, nothing more.

  26. Re:Ugh by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

    Nah, the US is the damage. Just like nobody outside China is affected by the great firewall, and most inside don't know or aren't affected by it (the damage routing has already been done), the routing around the US is happening now. Europe and such are better, at least most placed don't allow patents on math, yet, so no software patents. Strange that the US law prevents a sorting algorithm on paper from being patented, but if you patent it "on a computer" that patent can be applied t the algorithm on paper. That kind of insanity is damage and will be routed around.

    THe ??AA have the choice to adapt before irrelevance is complete, or they will be routed around, no matter how may of who they buy. Sure, they can shut down Napster and megauploads, but how's that doing for online piracy? Still going up? How about CD prices? Still increasing as downloads increase? You can (economically) prove the system is broken just from that. Demand goes down and supply goes up while prices go up. A person sufficiently cynical would argue they are keeping CD prices artificially high (and restricting authorized online availability) to push people to illegal downloads to then go out and make all that illegal, when dropping the price on CDs to $5 or $10 each for everything would greatly increase profits and revenues.

  27. Re: encryption and legislation by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 2

    Possibly. But encryption is needed for internet commerce, which is worth $684B in the US. If there is anything that talks louder than the military, it's money.

  28. Re:Ugh by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

    Panem? Check. Circenses? Check. Revolution averted.

    You're right. Pedophile enabler is stupid. And yet, it works. Do not underestimate public ignorance and desire for a good old-fashioned moral outrage, or a legitimate target to hate. Pedophiles are the new communists, or witches. A little flimsy evidence is all you need to ruin someone's life. After all, if they won't reveal the key, they must be guilty.

  29. Re:Ugh by tqk · · Score: 2

    To say it is the USA only, gives a huge pass to those governments in the EU.

    The thing is, though, it seems very much to be USA driven., and the Euros (from what I've read) have been fighting against it harder than pretty much anyone. TPB is Swedish, yes? SOPA, PIPA, TPP, DMCA, yada, yada, yada: USA! When it showed up in Poland, thousands (tens of thousands?) of people actually hit the streets (literally) in lousy weather and scared Polish politicians silly enough to kill it. France is "this close" to killing their "N Strikes" (HADOPI?) thingy. Portugal, Spain, ... don't appear to think this's a problem worth their time, or that kind of a solution to the problem is worse than the problem itself.

    The US, on the other hand, continues full speed ahead; damn the torpedos! The USA's legacy entertainment industry is definitely the prime mover behind most of this madness.

    [I love Poles. :-) This world needs lots more people like them.]

    --
    "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.