Slashdot Mirror


WW2 Carrier Pigeon and Undecoded Message Found In Chimney

BigBadBus writes "The BBC is reporting that the remains of a World War 2 carrier pigeon were found during renovation of a chimney in England. What is interesting is that the pigeon's remains still had its message attached to the leg ring; even more interesting, this is the first recorded instance of a code being used rather than plain text. The successor to WW2 code-breaking HQ Bletchley Park, the GCHQ, is trying to decipher this unique code. Maybe a Slashdot reader can beat them to it?"

287 comments

  1. I got it! by crazyjj · · Score: 5, Funny

    It says, "Dresden agrees to surrender, no need to firebomb, Feb. 12, 1945"

    --
    What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    1. Re:I got it! by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Funny

      "drink more ovaltine"

      doh! I knew it. just knew it.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:I got it! by ByOhTek · · Score: 4, Funny

      One more good reason not to stop for a smoke, eh?

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    3. Re:I got it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It says, "Japan agrees to surrender, tell our US allies no need to H-bomb, Aug. 5, 1945"

    4. Re:I got it! by war4peace · · Score: 2

      Nope, it's a list of future MS Products keys. Office 2020 and Windows 13 included. Those are Volume License keys, which makes them even more valuable.
      I now propose the nice elderly couple who found the message to be interrogated and summarily fined+jailed for Software Piracy. Think of the children!

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    5. Re:I got it! by scotts13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wrong bomb. Fission, not fusion. They're called "A-bombs."

    6. Re:I got it! by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, it's a bit longer, and translates to:
      Don't look like Neanderthals
      Living in a cave
      Stay clean and ready with
      Burma Shave

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    7. Re:I got it! by linear+a · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Getting hungry on the front. Send more pigeons."

    8. Re:I got it! by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

      A Sky King moment for sure. Or was that Winky Dink?

    9. Re:I got it! by gmanterry · · Score: 3, Informative

      "drink more ovaltine"

      doh! I knew it. just knew it.

      That's great. I'm over 70 and I do indeed remember my Ovaltine decoders. I bet a very large percentage of the people here on /. have no clue what your post was about. Thank you sir, for reminding me of some good childhood memories.

      --
      Since when is "public safety" the root password to the Constitution?
    10. Re:I got it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Clearly a cooking instructions for smoked pigeon.

    11. Re:I got it! by wrp103 · · Score: 1

      "drink more ovaltine"

      doh! I knew it. just knew it.

      That's great. I'm over 70 and I do indeed remember my Ovaltine decoders. I bet a very large percentage of the people here on /. have no clue what your post was about. Thank you sir, for reminding me of some good childhood memories.

      Not only did I get an Ovaltine secret decoder ring, but I made my brother drink it, since I couldn't stand the stuff. ;^)

    12. Re:I got it! by ByteSlicer · · Score: 2

      It says: "I lost my pigeon in a chimney. Please send a new one."

    13. Re:I got it! by mcmaddog · · Score: 1

      "A Christmas Story" has been a very popular movie since it came out and so a large percentage of us on /. probably do have a clue even if it's not first hand ;)

    14. Re:I got it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just think, if it had gone through, Slaughterhouse Five would never have been written.

    15. Re:I got it! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      It'll be their children doing the prosecution.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    16. Re:I got it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have us intrigued! I was wondering what that Ovaltine reference was about. Please, elaborate....Ovaltine decoders?

    17. Re:I got it! by evilviper · · Score: 2

      Due to "A Christmas Story" being rather inoffensive, it is played during the holidays with almost as much frequency as "It's a Wonderful Life" once was... Ovaltine decoder rings played a major role in the story, and more people are likely familar with them from the movie, than from first hand experience. And I explect a large percentage of /.ers have seen the film at least once.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    18. Re:I got it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those who've seen the movie "A Christmas Story" will get it. =)

    19. Re:I got it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could, you know, catch 'A Christmas Story' as it runs for 24 hours straight on TNT. :)

  2. Undecoded? by Revotron · · Score: 4, Informative

    So, encoded?

    1. Re:Undecoded? by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      I suppose if it were plain text, then it could be undecoded without being encoded.

    2. Re:Undecoded? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

      It could be random text, in which case it's not encoded, but it is (and will remain) undecoded.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    3. Re:Undecoded? by ddd0004 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I prefer the doubly redundant not not undecoded. Oh well, back to my technical writing job.

    4. Re:Undecoded? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Then it is undeciphered not undecoded.

    5. Re:Undecoded? by Triv · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If a message is "encoded" it doesn't imply one way or another whether it had been decoded at some point. Just because the message is "encoded" doesn't mean it hasn't been decoded; decoding a message doesn't change the state of the original message as it's still encoded.

      Undecoded is more precise.

    6. Re:Undecoded? by HarrySquatter · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, "undeciphered" is more precise. Because that covers the fact that it might not be encoded but the meaning if the message has not yet been interpreted.

    7. Re:Undecoded? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except if you read the TFS you'd see "even more interesting, this is the first recorded instance of a code being used rather than plain text"

      So try again with your more "precise"... Remember kids, pedantry just makes you look like annoying twerp while the rest of society usually "gets it" without your unnecessary input... especially when you aren't right.

    8. Re:Undecoded? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing wrong with pedantry. This attempt failed because one of his premises was wrong---it's quite clear that the text is in fact encoded.

      In order to be successfully pedantic you have to be more rigorous about assembling your facts. That's why trying to be pedantic is worthwhile, because it forces you to better analyze the available material, unless you don't mind looking like an ass.

    9. Re:Undecoded? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was wrong on two counts.

      First by claiming UNDECODED wasn't more precise than encoded the GP referred to. This isn't true even if his implication that "undeciphered" is "more acceptable" than "undecoded" .. (you see I got what he meant even if he was wrong with what he said)
      and
      Second his supporting reason why it was "more acceptable" was completely off base.

      Pedantic fail all around and modded informative to boot. You see how extraneous this conversation is? Exactly my point about pedantry.

    10. Re:Undecoded? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The purpose of language is to convey meaning.

      Leaving it to the unwashed, nigh-illiterate masses to "just get it" inevitably leads to mis-interpretation and misunderstanding.

      The rise of linguistic abominations like ebonics and urban slang is a direct outcome of lazy language use arising directly from others' forbearance of "pedantry".

      With the pervasiveness of your stated position, is it any wonder that the majority of posters on here (and elsewhere) can't determine the correct "their, there or they're" to use most of the time? or need to "aks" you questions?

      Language is a tool; SO USE IT LIKE ONE! ...and like a craftsman, do so with practiced skill and not sloppily like some amateur...

      -AC

    11. Re:Undecoded? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      If you're going to pick that kind of nit, then it was encrypted.

    12. Re:Undecoded? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No probably they can understand it just fine, they just chose to litter our sight with their unnecessary (and also wrong) pedantry..

      "Thanks Sheldon, now let the normal people have a conversation."

    13. Re:Undecoded? by lucm · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you're going to pick that kind of nit, then it was encrypted.

      read the article: the bird died in the chimney, there was no crypt involved.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    14. Re:Undecoded? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, undeciphered is the proper term. It is also a proper word. "Undecoded" is not.

    15. Re:Undecoded? by Shaiku · · Score: 1

      This message is encoded using the English alphabet, but it is not encrypted.

    16. Re:Undecoded? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And his statement was wrong as is yours in response to mine.

    17. Re:Undecoded? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, "undelivered" is even more precise. Given that someone may have checked that it was encoded properly before sending it, (maybe by deciphering it, then we can't definitively say it is "undeciphered". But since it never made it to it's destination, we can be fairly certain it was never delivered.

    18. Re:Undecoded? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Nope, if its actually random then its not enciphered either.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    19. Re:Undecoded? by jkflying · · Score: 2

      +1 Insightful.

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
    20. Re:Undecoded? by fm6 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The pigeon was hidden in the chimney (for 70 years!). "Crypt" is Greek for hiding place. Stupid kids with no education!

    21. Re:Undecoded? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the story says the message is indeed decoded.

    22. Re:Undecoded? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      Plain text is still encoded. Your decoding training was called "learning to read."

    23. Re:Undecoded? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Or it happens to match some pattern and is decoded into something it never was.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    24. Re:Undecoded? by DangerOnTheRanger · · Score: 1

      Unless it's encoded in something other than ASCII. Then things could get complicated...

    25. Re:Undecoded? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See also "undead".

    26. Re:Undecoded? by TenAngryPistols · · Score: 1

      the purpose of language is to woo women

    27. Re:Undecoded? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bird was lost in the chimney. I doubt it was hidden.

    28. Re:Undecoded? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Since this is (allegedly) world war 2, and "Work on the ASCII standard began on October 6, 1960," (Wikipedia), it's a pretty safe bet that it's not encoded in ASCII. It may (or may not) be in Latin script.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    29. Re:Undecoded? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      They may or may not have had an education. If they did have an education, then it doesn't appear to have taken hold.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    30. Re:Undecoded? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except if you read the TFS you'd see "even more interesting, this is the first recorded instance of a code being used rather than plain text"

      Yeah, because the Caeser cipher was only developed long after WW2.

  3. Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It says, "All Germany's base are belong to us"

    1. Re:Translation by kiehlster · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's no wonder the pidgeon was found in a chimney. That pidgeon would have had to fly from Germany all the way across the English Channel and to some place in London. It must have died of a heart attack after such a flight. If such a pidgeon were alive today, we'd have the best IPoAC latency rates ever recorded.

    2. Re:Translation by joelleo · · Score: 1

      BAHAHAHAH if only I had mod points =)

      RFC 1149: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1149

      --
      "In the end, there is simply no weapon more devastating than the truth, delivered in just the right way." - tnk1
    3. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This pigeon has no chance to survive. It will make its time."

  4. Got it too: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Eat me with a peeper sauce and a good wine.

    1. Re:Got it too: by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Is peeper sauce made with peeps?

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:Got it too: by YodasEvilTwin · · Score: 1

      peeper sauce

      OH GOD

    3. Re:Got it too: by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      I believe I saw this in Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom...

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:Got it too: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe you mean "hasenpfeffer".

      http://looney.goldenagecartoons.com/tv/bugstweety/bnt87-88.html

  5. Undecoded by rwise2112 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    WW2 Carrier Pigeon and Undecoded Message Found In Chimney

    I guess that's code for coded.

    --

    "For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert"
  6. Serialz.pigeon.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Obviously they were just sending serial numbers to aid in pirating punch card software.

  7. Packet loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    They had huge latency and packet loss back then, didn't they?

    1. Re:Packet loss by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 2

      They had huge latency and packet loss back then, didn't they?

      There may be huge latency and packet ordering problems, but hey... it's been over 60 years and they're still able to completely recover those packets!

      Now the issue will be buffering them up and getting them in order....

  8. recovering an RFC 1149 "lost packet"??? by RobertLTux · · Score: 3

    i wonder how the bird got in the chimney in the first place

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    1. Re:recovering an RFC 1149 "lost packet"??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That should be painfully obvious. It wasn't carrying a coconut.

    2. Re:recovering an RFC 1149 "lost packet"??? by xevioso · · Score: 1

      This is a very good question.

    3. Re:recovering an RFC 1149 "lost packet"??? by crazyjj · · Score: 4, Funny

      i wonder how the bird got in the chimney in the first place

      It walked there.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    4. Re:recovering an RFC 1149 "lost packet"??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I would say the pigeon landed on the chimney for the warmth. It was overcome by the smoke from a fire below and fell into the chimney.

      A workman found dead ducks in my fireplace. I guess it is pretty common for an uncapped chimney. (I put caps on my chimneys... also keeps bats out of the fireplace.)

    5. Re:recovering an RFC 1149 "lost packet"??? by gman003 · · Score: 5, Informative

      England, as you may be aware, is often cold. A bird could easily decide to perch next to a chimney to keep warm. It then passes out from carbon monoxide inhalation, and topples into the chimney, where it becomes lodged.

    6. Re:recovering an RFC 1149 "lost packet"??? by swanzilla · · Score: 4, Funny

      Very small helicopter.

    7. Re:recovering an RFC 1149 "lost packet"??? by DulcetTone · · Score: 5, Funny

      It flue in

      --
      tone
    8. Re:recovering an RFC 1149 "lost packet"??? by wooferhound · · Score: 1

      England, as you may be aware, is often cold. A bird could easily decide to perch next to a chimney to keep warm. It then passes out from carbon monoxide inhalation, and topples into the chimney, where it becomes lodged.

      But then the fireplace was never used again . . . which is odd . . .

      --
      We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
    9. Re:recovering an RFC 1149 "lost packet"??? by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it was flying in a circle, and the built the chimney around it?

    10. Re:recovering an RFC 1149 "lost packet"??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Odd that such a thing just so happened to occur on the VERY LAST instance of said chimney being used for somewhere around SEVENTY YEARS....

      I assumed from the summary that it had gotten somewhere within the body of the chimney itself (but outside the flue) where it eventually died of [exposure/thirst/hunger] and was thus somewhat protected from the elements AND the function of the chimney for the seven decades since.

      Admitedly, having trolled here for nigh on a decade myself, I didn't RTFA...

      -AC

    11. Re:recovering an RFC 1149 "lost packet"??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Fireplace may well have been used, without anyone realising a dead bird was being smoked in the chimney.

    12. Re:recovering an RFC 1149 "lost packet"??? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Pffft, everyone knows pigeons take the elevator.

    13. Re:recovering an RFC 1149 "lost packet"??? by adolf · · Score: 1

      We don't know that it was a fireplace, do we?

      Three out of four houses I've lived in had brick chimneys, used variously for venting furnaces or water heaters or both. None of them had fireplaces.

      There is generally a quiet and cool place at the bottom of such a chimney, often with a door allowing for cleanout. In my experience, dead birds tend to gather there.

    14. Re:recovering an RFC 1149 "lost packet"??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TFA was about a guy restoring an old fireplace, cleaning out debris, finding pigeon. So yes, fireplace.

    15. Re:recovering an RFC 1149 "lost packet"??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By that logic, England, being often cold, should have far fewer birds. Either that or chimneys are frequently stuffed with birds.

      Which they may be, but I'm not from England so can't say.

    16. Re:recovering an RFC 1149 "lost packet"??? by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      i wonder how the bird got in the chimney in the first place

      I don't know how they do it in your country, but In some places in the world it's quite common to leave the top of the chimney open to the atmosphere.

    17. Re:recovering an RFC 1149 "lost packet"??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fireplace shown in the video sure looked like a real fireplace to me.

    18. Re:recovering an RFC 1149 "lost packet"??? by someone1234 · · Score: 1

      Misconfigured firewall.

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    19. Re:recovering an RFC 1149 "lost packet"??? by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      i wonder how the bird got in the chimney in the first place

      It was attempting a chimney offload.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TCP_offload_engine

    20. Re:recovering an RFC 1149 "lost packet"??? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2
      In the 1940's Central heating had not been invented. EVERY house in the uK had fireplaces in every room. That was how you kept warm.

      And yes, a cold bird resting in the warm flue gasses would rapidly be paralised by carbon monoxide poisoning, and fall down the chimney.

      It is also highly likely that the chimney would have fallen into disuse shortly afterwards - perhaps due to fuel shortage, and then, shortly after the war, buring coal in open fires was banned, so it was never used again.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    21. Re:recovering an RFC 1149 "lost packet"??? by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Well, not till the seventies (ish) and then only in towns. We still burn whatever we like in the country.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    22. Re:recovering an RFC 1149 "lost packet"??? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Not where I come from. It lets the water - and hanimalcules - in.

      Picture a contraption like the muzzle brake from a howitzer with a Chinaman's hat on top.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    23. Re:recovering an RFC 1149 "lost packet"??? by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      ...and it's pining for the fjords ;-)

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    24. Re:recovering an RFC 1149 "lost packet"??? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      In the 1940's Central heating had not been invented.

      Central heating was invented several centuries BCE by the Romans (I don't know of any earlier ; I'd welcome hearing of any earlier).

      EVERY house in the uK had fireplaces in every room.

      Not correct. I've recently moved out of a house which was built in approximately 1938 (a friend and former colleague lived in the house next door when being strafed in 1941). All of the houses of that design - thousands of them in this town alone - had a single fireplace in the living room with a "back boiler" which heated water for washing and bathing. Cooking was by town gas (dry distillation of coal) or electricity. In the late 1970s the city council (landlords) added a central-heating system also fired off the back boiler, while simultaneously replacing the open fire places with gas fires.

      There was no heating outside the living room, kitchen and bathroom. I added bedroom radiators to the house myself.

      And the building's insulation was crap. Waking up to find ice on the inside of the windows was nothing unusual.

      Kids today are poofs, even the straight ones.

      And yes, a cold bird resting in the warm flue gasses would rapidly be paralised by carbon monoxide poisoning,

      If and only if the fire in the grate below was under-ventilated. Otherwise, the amount of carbon monoxide produced (and the consequent formation of carboxy-haemoglobin, and it's slow decay compared to oxy-haemoglobin) wouldn't be sufficient to kill the animal. A properly ventilated fire isn't a problem, as the fucking pigeons who would nest on the top of my chimney every year at the above-mentioned house can testify. I've come worryingly close to being rendered unconscious by carbon monoxide poisoning in the past (different flat, "unfit for human habitation", portable gas heater in the depths of winter with all the windows closed ; fucking dangerous bits of kit) but it's not an automatic death sentence.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    25. Re:recovering an RFC 1149 "lost packet"??? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Smoke-free zones were started in the largest cities in the late 1950s, particularly after the "great smogs" in London in IIRC 1956-7. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_Air_Act_1956 tells me it was a little earlier.

      The move to natural gas from the late 1960s made a big difference too.

      I'm not sure if you can still buy plain un-treated coal. I'll have to keep my eyes peeled - good for fossils, and you occasionally get some nice iron pyrites crystals too.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    26. Re:recovering an RFC 1149 "lost packet"??? by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Didn't realise it was that early. But yes, outside the smoke free zones you can still buy it freely. I burnt it up until 2006 when I moved.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
  9. One for the Brits by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 5, Funny

    It read "This pigeon is under no circumstances to be shot and eaten, nor allowed near chimneys"

    --
    Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
  10. Decoded! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Don't forget to drink your Ovaltine"

  11. Don't know why, but It's some sort of German by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Wenn ist das Nunstuck git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!"

    1. Re:Don't know why, but It's some sort of German by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No wonder pigeon is dead. Or is it? Maybe it's just pining for the fjords.

    2. Re:Don't know why, but It's some sort of German by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Ich bin ein Holzfller und fhl mich stark
      Ich schlaf des Nachts und hack am Tag

      Er ist ein Holzfller und fhlt sich stark
      Er schlaft des Nachts und hackt am Tag

      Ich flle Bume, ich ess mein Brot
      Ich geh auf das WC
      Am Mittwoch geh ich shopping
      Kau kekse zum kaffee

      Er fllt die Bume er isst sein Brot
      Er geht auf das WC
      Am Mittwoch geht er shopping
      Kaut kekse zum kaffeev

      Er ist ein Holzfller und fhlt sich stark
      Er schlaft des Nachts und hackt am Tag

      Ich flle Bume und hupf und spring
      Steck Blumen in die Vas
      Ich schlupf in Fraukenleider
      Und lummel mich in Bars

      Er fllt Bume, er hupft und springt
      Steckt Blumen in die Vas
      Er schlupft in Fraukenleider
      Und lummelt sich in Bars...?

      Er ist ein Holzfller und fhlt sich stark
      Er schlaft des Nachts und hackt am Tag

      Ich flle Bume, trag Stockelschuh
      Und Strumpf und Bustenhalter
      Wr gern ein kleines Mdchen
      So wie mein Onkel Walter

      Er fllt die Bume, tragt Stockelschuh
      Und Strumpf und Bustenhalter...?

    3. Re:Don't know why, but It's some sort of German by BlueMonk · · Score: 2

      Does Slashdot need to allow the "Funny" score of a post to go up to "6" for "Fatally Funny" and require a release form to be signed if you want to browse at a level that allows you to see posts with a rating of 6?

    4. Re:Don't know why, but It's some sort of German by jkflying · · Score: 1

      The second part of the message:
      "Die ist ein Kinnerhunder und zwei Mackel uber und der bitte schön ist den Wunderhaus sprechensie. 'Nein' sprecht der Herren 'Ist aufern borger mit zveitingen'."

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
    5. Re:Don't know why, but It's some sort of German by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a very good translation.

    6. Re:Don't know why, but It's some sort of German by janisozaur · · Score: 1

      If only I had mod points, +1 insightful

  12. I Figured It Out! by kaellinn18 · · Score: 1

    "Be sure to drink your Ovaltine."

    --

    --------
    This isn't the sig you're looking for. Move along.
    1. Re:I Figured It Out! by lucm · · Score: 1

      And everybody else figured out that you don't read the other comments or you would have seen that a bunch of people made the same joke already. You must be one of those write-only readers.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    2. Re:I Figured It Out! by kaellinn18 · · Score: 1

      When I wrote it, those other comments didn't exist on my screen. Sorry for ruining your day!

      --

      --------
      This isn't the sig you're looking for. Move along.
    3. Re:I Figured It Out! by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      Everybody meet Buzz Killington.

    4. Re:I Figured It Out! by lucm · · Score: 0

      From a quick count, 8 posters made the same joke (many after you), and this represents roughly 5% of the comments at the moment of counting. This should not come as a surprise in a world where more tweets and facebook status are posted than read, yet I can't help but feel disappointed.

      You did not really ruin my day however, because when I called my voodoo priest to put a curse on you he told me that his daughter is single again (the unpleasant boyfriend was mysteriously stoned to death while alone in a stalled elevator) so I'm taking her out tonight and I'm definitely gonna tap me some of that black magic. Meanwhile since I noticed that other people made the same joke after you I altered the curse and made it a wildcard, which means you will only get a fraction of the misery unleashed by the death of a small goat. Pinga!

      I hope this will be a learning experience for you. Also please note that wussiness (i.e.: giving an explanation instead of quietly accepting a blame from a stranger about posting a joke someone already posted on Slashdot) is one of the least attractive attitudes one can exhibit, and it is made even worse by a fake apology. As for posting a true apology, it's a good idea only for females as studies have shown that it makes men look weak.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
  13. decoded message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eat your ovaltine!

    -db

  14. What are the lapel pins? by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

    Looks like a red flower, maybe a poppy. Is it some local or national thing? Can any slashdotter not working on decoding enlighten, please?

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
    1. Re:What are the lapel pins? by They'reComingToTakeM · · Score: 3, Informative

      Looks like a red flower, maybe a poppy. Is it some local or national thing? Can any slashdotter not working on decoding enlighten, please?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remembrance_poppy

    2. Re:What are the lapel pins? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Annual thing : http://www.britishlegion.org.uk/support-us/

      The date is the anniversary of Armistice Day: 11/11

    3. Re:What are the lapel pins? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poppies are worn to mark Rememberance Day (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remembrance_Day)

    4. Re:What are the lapel pins? by SonnyDog09 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In Flanders fields the poppies blow
      Between the crosses, row on row,
      That mark our place; and in the sky
      The larks, still bravely singing, fly
      Scarce heard amid the guns below.

      We are the Dead. Short days ago
      We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow,
      Loved and were loved, and now we lie,
      In Flanders fields.

      Take up our quarrel with the foe:
      To you from failing hands we throw
      The torch; be yours to hold it high.
      If ye break faith with us who die
      We shall not sleep, though poppies grow
      In Flanders fields.

      -- John McCrae

      --
      Your "fair share" is NOT in my wallet.
    5. Re:What are the lapel pins? by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      Where are the bloody mod points when you need them ?!?

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    6. Re:What are the lapel pins? by jdavidb · · Score: 0

      Take up our quarrel with the foe:

      No thanks. I have no quarrel. My foes are the people in the institution that pressed my ancestors into service for war and stole their income to support war.

      The torch; be yours to hold it high. If ye break faith with us who die We shall not sleep, though poppies grow

      Sorry about that, but I do not consent. Throwing bad money after good is never a good idea, and when it's used as encouragement to warfare, the idea is downright reprehensible.

    7. Re:What are the lapel pins? by quacking+duck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Poignant as the words are, recently (last 10 years or so?) someone scored them to music for Remembrance Day ceremonies. Let me tell you, listening to these words from the dead, sung by school-age children, is one of the most powerful and haunting things you can hear.

    8. Re:What are the lapel pins? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The poem refers to WW I, or "the war to end all wars" as it was known then. The brits had a habit of trying random generals until they found a competent one. The much more common incompetents would do what the guy before him did, mass offenses in trench warfare, thus mass casualties.

      "The flower of england, face down in the mud"

    9. Re:What are the lapel pins? by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      Take up our quarrel with the foe:

      No thanks. I have no quarrel. My foes are the people in the institution that pressed my ancestors into service for war and stole their income to support war.

      The torch; be yours to hold it high.
      If ye break faith with us who die
      We shall not sleep, though poppies grow

      Sorry about that, but I do not consent. Throwing bad money after good is never a good idea, and when it's used as encouragement to warfare, the idea is downright reprehensible.

      You have an interesting view of England's role in WWII. You would have preferred that no one oppose Germany's plans of occupying Europe?

    10. Re:What are the lapel pins? by neonsignal · · Score: 2

      You would have preferred that no one oppose Germany's plans of occupying Europe?

      "In Flanders Fields" was written during the Great War, not World War II.

    11. Re:What are the lapel pins? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Please tell me that you are not native to any English speaking nation.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    12. Re:What are the lapel pins? by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      You have an interesting view of England's role in WWII. You would have preferred that no one oppose Germany's plans of occupying Europe?

      They were all bad guys if you ask me.

  15. When decoded it reads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Gotcha!, He He!

    Mutley

  16. Decoded by wcrowe · · Score: 0

    It says, "besuretodrinkyourovaltine"

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  17. If you are reading this by trevc · · Score: 0
  18. If it was encoded with a one-time pad... by thenendo · · Score: 2

    ... it may never be decoded :(

    1. Re:If it was encoded with a one-time pad... by MrSteveSD · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Fundamentally uncrackable provided the pad is truly random. The only chance is if they can find the pad in the archives, but I wouldn't pin my hopes on that.

  19. Encoded string by thrill12 · · Score: 4, Informative

    At least what I could read of it thus far from the image, some letters in parenthesis if I was unsure, and probably not everything correct: (please reply with your corrections)
    A(C)AKN HVPKD (F)NFJU YIDD(C/L)
    RQX(Q)R DJHFP (E/F)OVFN MIAPX
    PABUZ WYYNP C(M)PNW HJR(C)H
    NLXKE MEMEK ON(O)(I/L)B AREE(G)?
    UAOTA RBQRH DJOFM TPZEH
    LKX(E/P)H R(E/F)(E/F)HT JRZCQ FNKTQ
    KLDTS (E/F)QIRU AOAKN (2)7 1525/6

    NURP 40 TW 194
    NURP 37 DK (7/1)6

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
    1. Re:Encoded string by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The letter frequencies appear much close to what you'd expect if they are totally random. This might mean it's a one-time pad in which case it can't be decoded at all.

      'A': 9, 'N': 9, 'R': 9,
        'H': 8, 'K': 8,
      'D': 7, 'O': 7, 'P': 7,
      'E': 6, 'F': 6, 'Q': 6,
      'G': 5, 'J': 5, 'M': 5, 'T': 5,
      'I': 4, 'U': 4, 'X': 4, 'Z': 4,
      'C': 3, 'B': 3, 'L': 3, 'Y': 3,
      'W': 2, 'V': 2,
      'S': 1

    2. Re:Encoded string by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There are two possibilities. First this is a substitution cipher with the letters regrouped into 5 letter groups. This might be breakable with statistical cryptanalysis. However, it's also possible a codebook was used, which would map each 5 letter group to a word or phase (although it's a little wordy for that). In which case a single message won't provide sufficient context to decode the message without the codebook.

    3. Re:Encoded string by linebackn · · Score: 1

      Looks like a set of Windows 8 license keys. DMCA takedown in 3..2..1..

    4. Re:Encoded string by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless the GCHQ or the Germans (was the pigeon inbound or outbound?) still have the original decoding pad.

    5. Re:Encoded string by GreyFish · · Score: 2

      I get:

      AOAKN HVPKD FNFJU YIDDC
      RQXSR DJHFP EOVFN MIAPX
      PABUZ WTYNP CMPNW HJR?H
      NLXKE M?M?K ONOIB A???Q
      UAOTA RBQRH DJOFM TPZLH
      LKXEH REEHT JRZCQ FNKTQ
      KLDTS EQIRU AOAKN

      The F's are quite square, but the E's are rouned.

      note that it starts and ends with AOAKN to tell whoever is decoding it how to generate the key.

      SOE used "Poem codes":

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poem_code

    6. Re:Encoded string by jonadab · · Score: 1

      A third possibility is that it's a rotating substitution cipher (perhaps using Enigma). The part at the end could indicate encryption settings, either directly or via lookup in a schedule. This would make it similar to what the German navy used, for example.

      The thing that's going to make the encryption hard to break is the fact that the message is so short and was recovered in isolation.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    7. Re:Encoded string by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would the pigeon handler have access to an Enigma? Was a little bulky for field use, and if you're using pigeons, you're probably not travelling too heavy.

    8. Re:Encoded string by jemtallon · · Score: 1

      Given that the form on which the code is written is in English, I'd hope we can rule out the case of an incoming message from Germany.

    9. Re:Encoded string by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the division into groups of 5 is for readability. That's a standard way to write a ciphertext on paper. The division into groups of 5, I guarantee you, will provide no meaningful clue to the plaintext message.

    10. Re:Encoded string by slew · · Score: 1

      This is most likely a ADFGX-style cipher given the 5-character length units.

    11. Re:Encoded string by drkim · · Score: 1

      Would the pigeon handler have access to an Enigma? Was a little bulky for field use, and if you're using pigeons, you're probably not travelling too heavy.

      The Enigma was used by the Germans, not the British.

    12. Re:Encoded string by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing spies would never use dirty tricks to avoid identification of secret messages...

    13. Re:Encoded string by slew · · Score: 1

      Actually, now that I think about it some mroe, given the digraph letter frequencies, it's probably more likely a double playfair cipher (which was in common use at the time). The ADFGX-like cipher wouldn't have this type of letter frequency distribution...

    14. Re:Encoded string by dch24 · · Score: 1

      If it is either of these ciphers, that means it was a message encoded using a German encryption scheme.

      I think that means the message was from a German spy in England or for a British spy in Axis territory. (And the pigeon's number on the band was an "unregistered" number.) Either way, it should be a very interesting message.

    15. Re:Encoded string by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Interesting, though by the middle of WWII the "German" spies in England were all double agents. The Brits were so good at breaking ciphers that they basically could just meet the spies as they came ashore and sign them up, and of course once you have half the network penetrated you know about the spies that are headed your way before they even get their own assignments.

    16. Re:Encoded string by dch24 · · Score: 2

      http://www.bletchleypark.org/news/docview.rhtm/675670 says the red capsule attached to the pigeon is an Allied capsule, so if the code is German the message is from a German spy.

      It's more likely the code is British. It has "AOAKN" twice - once at the start and once at the end, and from the digraph frequency (below), "AO" "FN" and "AK" stand out. I think that rules out any Enigma-based codes (e.g. the British TypeX), as well as the US SIGABA - the AOAKN would not be repeated at the beginning and end. I haven't found a description of BAMS yet.

      Digraph frequency:
      2 AR
      2 DJ
      2 GH
      2 JR
      2 ME
      2 RZ
      2 UA
      2 OA, 2 AK, 2 KN (this is AOAKN twice)

      3 AO
      3 FN

    17. Re:Encoded string by dch24 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ok, never mind about the AOAKN: http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2012/11/02/dead-pigeon-sparks-ww2-cipher-mystery

      And decryption efforts are being coordinated here: http://en.reddit.com/r/cryptography/comments/12jipi/ww2_pigeon_carried_an_encrypted_text_here_it_is/.

      (Thanks, by the way, for the info about all WWII German spies in the UK.)

    18. Re:Encoded string by scubamage · · Score: 1

      Thank you guys, I was really starting to fret when I realized I was almost half way through the comments before I saw an actual interest in the cool puzzle in front of us. Nothing but jokes and snark... sort of disheartening.

    19. Re:Encoded string by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 1

      Unlikely, but what if the operative found an encoded message in a German HQ and was sending it on knowing it could be decrypted by the spooks? Might explain why it is one of a very rare class of message.

      --
      Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
    20. Re:Encoded string by drkim · · Score: 1

      Unlikely, but what if the operative found an encoded message in a German HQ and was sending it on knowing it could be decrypted by the spooks? Might explain why it is one of a very rare class of message.

      It's possible he may have found an Enigma encoded message; but I think this thread was suggesting he was dragging around an Enigma machine of his own, and was using it to encrypt.

      This is unlikely since this message was intended for the British, (delivery instructions in English and pigeon found in England.)

    21. Re:Encoded string by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

      The Enigma was used by the Germans, not the British.

      True enough, but there is a record of the Brits and the French (who were in the unoccupied part of France) exchanging German Enigma keys which had been encrypted with Enigmas!

      I am not a professional cryptographer, but I was astonished beyond words at reading about this usage of Enigmas, as it would seem that some bright Germans might have realized that Enigma-encrypted traffic was originating from England!

      --
      Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
    22. Re:Encoded string by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > The Enigma was used by the Germans, not the British.

      Yes, but they didn't just use it _in Germany_, and it is reasonable to imagine that they may have had people in England. I was not aware that we knew which side sent this particular message.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    23. Re:Encoded string by drkim · · Score: 1

      > The Enigma was used by the Germans, not the British.

      Yes, but they didn't just use it _in Germany_, and it is reasonable to imagine that they may have had people in England. I was not aware that we knew which side sent this particular message.

      The form appears to be English:
      http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/multimedia/archive/00351/115804953_02_351757c.jpg

  20. Activation Keys by DutchMasterKiller · · Score: 1

    Just a couple of Windows Activation keys @ 1:39

  21. Blackadder by ledow · · Score: 2

    George: "It's a bit charred. Something something at once..PS, due to communication crisis, the shooting of carrier pigeons is now a court-martial offence. I don't see what's so funny about that, sir."

    1. Re:Blackadder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh Bugger!

  22. But ofcourse... by thrill12 · · Score: 1
    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
  23. Clearly it was an open access point by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

    Put yourself in the carriers position. You are under a DDOS attack and you still want to deliver the packet. So you attempt to route around the damage.

    --
    You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  24. Re:'Undecoded message' by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

    Well, yes, but a "coded message" might not be an "undecoded message". That is, a "coded message" might have been decoded at some point, whereas an "undecoded message" has never been decoded.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  25. Swallow Pigeon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If only we had a few good African swallows, we could have sent a coconut too big to fall into chimneys"

  26. ciphertext? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone ought to post the cipher text.

  27. Really? by saveferrousoxide · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've boiled down the 32 comments (so far) to 2:
    "Drink more ovaltine! (ha ha)" and the like
    Undecoded = unnecessary double negative.

    Glad to save you some time, Dear Reader.

    1. Re:Really? by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      And no comments on the ridiculousness of "this is the first recorded instance of a code being used rather than plain text."

      The use of coded messages goes back thousands of years. I doubt the first recorded instance would be found on a pigeon from WWII.

    2. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why slashdot comments jumped the shark a long time. Too much stupidity where there used to be intelligence.

    3. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And no comments on the ridiculousness of "this is the first recorded instance of a code being used rather than plain text."

      The use of coded messages goes back thousands of years. I doubt the first recorded instance would be found on a pigeon from WWII.

      Well, since that quote was in the context of WWII carrier pigeon messages, your doubt is erroneous.

  28. Re:Undecoded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, it's natural language's wonderfully concise way of expressing "coded, but subject to ongoing attempts at decoding it" so that everybody who occasionally talks to people instead of machines immediately understands it.

  29. It says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Help, I'm stuck in a chimney. I'm attaching this message to the leg of a carrier pigeon. Oh crap, I am a carrier pigeon, and this is my leg."

  30. Re:Undecoded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah double negative so what.. in this case it's probably apropos...
    I don't know, perhaps it's indicating to you that it's coded and they haven't decoded it yet.. vs if they had just said "coded" which is ambiguous because you don't get any indication if that means they know how to decode it.

  31. Original code by smitsco · · Score: 5, Informative

    AOAKN HVPKD FNFJU YIDDC
    RQXSR DJHFP GoVFN MIAPX
    PABUZ WYYNP CMPNW HJRZH
    NLXKG MENEK ONOIB AREEQ
    UAOTA RBQRH DJoFM TPZEH
    LKXGH RGGHT JRZCQ FNKTQ
    KLDTS GQIRU AOAKN 27 1525/6

    NURP 40 TW 194
    NURP 37 DK 76

    lib 1025

    1. Re:Original code by F-3582 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Didn't expect the British to already use Windows back then. Why they shared those serialz via carrier pigeon is beyond me, though...

    2. Re:Original code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Reads as follows:
      Distract the pigeon. Tell him to look out window.
      While distracted, deliver a blow to the back of his head knocking him out
      Quickly behead, pluck and clean the carcass.
      If you are British, cook the entrails in oven for three hours. Enjoy.
      If American, cook the carcass in an oven with veggies for three hours. Enjoy

      Don't let the pigeon see this message
      He may be on to us

    3. Re:Original code by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 2

      Does it have \r\n or just \n?

    4. Re:Original code by pat0009 · · Score: 1

      The third word looks like ENEMY and the last word looks like EVENT.

    5. Re:Original code by pat0009 · · Score: 1

      Looking closer that if the last word is EVENT then the first word could be EVENT as well.

    6. Re:Original code by smitsco · · Score: 1

      Used the Slashdot comment box with Chrome browser. I didn't use an external editor and I didn't check for \r\n or \n afterward.

    7. Re:Original code by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      Well, Googling that was a waste of time...

    8. Re:Original code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably used a one-time-pad. I doubt the GCHQ kept all their old pads.

    9. Re:Original code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does have AOAKN.

    10. Re:Original code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Austin Milbarge: It's done. Here you go.
      Capt. Hefling: Done? That was a static filled, triple scrambled, pigeon transmission between two soldiers talking in Mandarin Chinese.
      Austin Millbarge: Well, they were only using a simple polyphoneticly grouped twenty square digit key, transposed from booster verdonic form, with multiple nulls. I broke it with this.
      Capt. Hefling: A Drogen's Decoder Wheel? They put these into cereal boxes for kid!
      Austin Millbarge: Yeah, I found it in a box of, uh . . . Lucky Charms.

    11. Re:Original code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That looks like ROT13!

  32. Britain's "Animals In War Memorial" by Darth+Snowshoe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    http://www.animalsinwar.org.uk/

    "This monument is dedicated to all the animals
    that served and died alongside British and allied forces
    in wars and campaigns throughout time"

    The second, smaller inscription simply reads:
    "They had no choice"

    .

    1. Re:Britain's "Animals In War Memorial" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The same is true for many of the soldiers.

    2. Re:Britain's "Animals In War Memorial" by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I would rather animals were forced into hostile situations the people.

      And I LOVE that you think the soldiers has some sort of choice in the matter.

      I would send every chimp into battle if it would save even one human soldier.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Britain's "Animals In War Memorial" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wasn't saying anything at all WRT humans and wars.

      My great grandfather was drafted for WWI (and his brother earned a purple heart). My grandfather was drafted and fought in the Battle of the Bulge.

      I just thought this monument was touching. I wondered why we have no similar monument here in the USA.

  33. Well seeing it was a British bird.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In that it was a British pigeon, there could only be on message: Bloody Hell - we are surrounded on all sides and are running short of supplies, We need emergency drop - location to follow.... HURRY!!! we are almost out of tea!

  34. Huh by fm6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unbelievable. They were still using carrier pigeons in WW II? Despite the invention of radio?

    My first thought was that this they got the war wrong or that it was some hobbyist playing at secret messages. But no, they did use pigeons in WW II. The Army Pigeon Service was only disbanded in 1957!

    It's weird how military people refuse to give up their favorite toys. As early as the Civil War, the smarter generals were pointing out the stupidity of charging cavalry against modern rifled weapons. And yet the last cavelry charge occurred 80 years later!

    1. Re:Huh by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      As early as the Civil War, the smarter generals were pointing out the stupidity of charging cavalry against modern rifled weapons. And yet the last cavelry charge occurred 80 years later!

      Are you suggesting that the pigeon was downed by the German anti-pigeon artillery?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Huh by EGSonikku · · Score: 1

      I assume that although they did have radio that they may have been worried about the Germans listening in? Also, Carrier Pigeons likely had a longer range than radio.

      --
      - "Scientia non habet inimicum nisp ignorantem"
    3. Re:Huh by MyFirstNameIsPaul · · Score: 1

      Did they practice electronic warfare in WWII? An enemy that is very effective at knocking out radio communications may not be as effective at killing pigeons.

      --

      I once took an excursion to Reddit, and later HN. Unlimited up/down voting sucks when dealing with a hive-mind.

    4. Re:Huh by fm6 · · Score: 1

      The security issues with radio also apply to RFC1149 media. Hence the encryption.

      A WW II field radio can reach 75 to 800 miles, depending on conditions. A pigeon can fly 500 miles in a day, but weigh that against vulnerability to snipers, wires, and raptors.

    5. Re:Huh by fm6 · · Score: 1

      More likely it was AWOL and got mugged.

    6. Re:Huh by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Right, an army full of riflemen has no way of shooting down pigeons.

    7. Re:Huh by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is correct. Radio communications in the UK were restricted for this sort of thing in WWII. Even weather reports were restricted, lest the Germans should use them to determine the best time to do an air raid. Not only were pigeons used to relay important intelligence, but they were drafted. Individuals who were known to keep pigeons for pleasure were required to turn their hobby into a civil service, much as factories were converted to produce matériel and farms were directed to increase production of specific staples.

    8. Re:Huh by nogginthenog · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall that all British bombers carried a couple of pigeons. Usefull if you crash!

    9. Re:Huh by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They were still using carrier pigeons in WW II? Despite the invention of radio?

      The trouble with radio is that everyone else hears it too. Carrier pigeons, assuming they get through, can carry a message from the front lines to the rear without it being intercepted as easily.

      And yet the last cavalry charge occurred 80 years later!

      Actually, the WWII cavalry charges were done because they sometimes worked: For example, an infamous Polish cavalry charge early on in the war was successful in halting the advance of an infantry force - the trouble was that then some tanks showed up and the cavalry had to retreat (this later got propagandized as Poles charging tanks with lances, but that never happened). Later on, an Italian cavalry unit was surrounded by Marshal Tito's forces in the Balkans, and managed to escape by charging them with sabres drawn. And yes, the Germans used cavalry too, mostly on the Eastern Front.

      In short, the generals aren't as stupid as you think.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    10. Re:Huh by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      I fear you don't always have the luxury of giving out your position by shooting at random birds.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    11. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In short, the generals aren't as stupid as you think.

      Whatever. If they had asked me if I thought it was a good idea to attack Russia in the winter, I would have suggested not doing that. I guess that makes them smart, or something.

    12. Re:Huh by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      Pigeons work very well for some tasks. Lockheed Sunnyvale used pigeons for some communitcation between Sunnyvale, Palo Alto, and Santa Cruz well into the 80's. They would carry microfilm with documents on it, far faster than it would be to send a car or other courier, and far more practical than electronic means at the time.

    13. Re:Huh by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      You might find shooting pigeons in flight with any rifle a bit more difficult than you imply. .

    14. Re:Huh by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      I believe the German generals were quite specific about it being a bad idea too. In fact they wanted to concentrate on taking Moscow as soon as possible in order to have somewhere to hide and rest during the winter. Luckily Hitler overruled them.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    15. Re:Huh by jkflying · · Score: 1

      Directional antennas allow you to track EM interference easily as well.

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
    16. Re:Huh by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the WWII cavalry charges were done because they sometimes worked: For example, an infamous Polish cavalry charge early on in the war was successful in halting the advance of an infantry force - the trouble was that then some tanks showed up and the cavalry had to retreat

      In other words, a stupid tactic sometimes works if your enemies tactics are even more stupid.

    17. Re:Huh by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      The German generals in fact recommended against attacking Russia in the winter, preferring to concentrate their efforts on the Brits. The trouble was that the corporal who was commanding them (Adolf Hitler) decided to ignore their advice.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    18. Re:Huh by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      Carrier pigeons could fly at a speed of a mile a minute. They were very good at subtlety sending messages far behind enemy lines, and radios were not impervious to interception. The likelihood of the Germans shooting down carrier pigeons and intercepting their messages is not very high.

    19. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Carrier pigeons are harder to jam than radio.

    20. Re:Huh by RDW · · Score: 1

      Unbelievable. They were still using carrier pigeons in WW II? Despite the invention of radio?

      If you think that's hard to believe, this is going to blow your mind:

      http://historywired.si.edu/object.cfm?ID=353
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Pigeon

    21. Re:Huh by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      And yet the last cavelry [sic] charge occurred 80 years later!

      No. Cavalry charges were used, often successfully, in WWII. They've also been used, with success, by US Special Forces leading native troops in Afghanistan.

    22. Re:Huh by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      An army full of rifleman still can't shoot at every passing bird and has no way of knowing which bird is a carrier pigeon.

    23. Re:Huh by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      An army full of rifleman still can't shoot at every passing bird and has no way of knowing which bird is a carrier pigeon.

      Exactly, some of them could have been battleship pigeons.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    24. Re:Huh by fm6 · · Score: 1

      "It's not against any religion, to want to dispose of a pigeon." — Tom Lehrer

    25. Re:Huh by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Sources? IANAS, but it seems to me that one dude with an AK47 and decent cover could decimate a whole calvary troop.

      Also, Afghanistan is a country where they take horses very seriously. I doubt that any Green Beret could teach them anything about cavalry tactics.

    26. Re:Huh by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      As I served in the French Foreign Legion in the 1980s, I was a telco operator. We frequently used Morse on long-distance comms ( SSB, AM ) simply because it was the one thing to still make it through atmospheric noise when voice was impossible to comprehend. Frequently did this in e.g. Centrafrican Republic, Chad etc. over distances > 800 km.

      We were also trained to transmit messages as couriers, walking / running / riding a motorbike.

      So there is nothing so exotic about pigeons being used in WW II.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    27. Re:Huh by fm6 · · Score: 1

      CW radio is nowhere near as primitive as carrier pigeons. The last U.S. military pigeon unit disappeared more than 50 years ago, but morse proficiency was still required of amateur radio operators until very recently — and a lot of hams learn it anyway.

    28. Re:Huh by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Try birdshot http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birdshot#Birdshot or ratshot http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratshot . I can't imagine that German soldiers were packing it, though.

      Maybe the Germans had an 88 Flak Pigeon Version . . . ?

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    29. Re:Huh by geekoid · · Score: 1

      haha, so there are 1000s, if not millions, of pigeon,l and some sniper is going to mange to shoot the few carrying the message? and why do you assume they didn't user redundancy?

      Radio is FAR easier to intercept.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    30. Re:Huh by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Much less finding the pigeon with the message, among millions of other pigeons.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    31. Re:Huh by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Here's an account from CNN:

      http://www.cnn.com/2011/10/06/us/afghanistan-horse-soldiers-memorial/index.html

      Also, I never said the SpecFor dudes taught the natives cavalry tactics. It was, indeed, more the other way around. The US troops just pointed them in the right direction.

    32. Re:Huh by geekoid · · Score: 1

      No. You're entire attitude is wrong.
      Neither tactic was stupid. YOu need to take into account the fog of war, and really bad communication. IT's not like they could wire a picture to HQ and then the next day get supplied for the next leg of the mission.

      regulating it to 'stupid' overlook a multitude of variables and unknowns. Welcome to war.

      In hand sight, was it the best move? no. With the data they had was it the best move? yes.

      One time I parked along the side of the road, in a legal parking space. Some asshole took the turn way to fast and hit my car?
      Was I stupid for parking there? no. Would I have been stupid for parking there if I know the jackass was going to come screaming around the corner? yes.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    33. Re:Huh by fm6 · · Score: 1

      I say say "stupid" you say "fog of war" Either way, it was blind luck that the horses turned out to be useful — as evidenced by the fact that they disappeared from the battlefield early in the war.

      A general at Gettysbug was famous for telling his officers "Your horses are for getting you to the battlefield. There are about as useful on the battlefield itself as an elephant." I'm sure I'm misquoting, but you get the gist. And this guy was just thinking about massed rifle fire. The idea that a horse can compete on a battlefield where there's automatic weapons and tanks is beyond absurd,

    34. Re:Huh by fm6 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Oh, read TFA yourself. There's nothing in there about cavalry charges. They used the horses to ride to the battle, not fight it. You also got the "leading native troops" part wrong.

    35. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't triangulate the start point; I assume that could be useful in some circumstances.

    36. Re:Huh by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Well, they probably did use redundancy, within the limits of their ability to keep them in stock.

      However, I do recall reading that pigeons were explicitly targeted in battle.

    37. Re:Huh by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      No, more like the enemy can't actually be everywhere at once, and does not have unlimited resources. Sure, cavalry are useless against machine guns, but the average soldier did not carry that kind of firepower back then. In fact, while modern riles are much better they can't do full auto for 15 minutes straight like they do in the movies either. The kind of weapon carried by an average soldier today would deplete its clip in a few seconds at full automatic, and only send a few dozen rounds down range at most. Back then a soldier might be able to fire a few rounds before reloading, and it was strictly semi-automatic. We're talking about the beginning of the war as well.

      Machine guns were of course very effective, but at the time were crew served weapons and it would probably take more than one to take out a large number of cavalry unless they had a lot of open field to cross. I think modern machine guns generally are manportable and can be operated by one man, but they aren't the sort of thing you just fire from the hip.

      The key to military tactics is to hit the enemy where they're weak, because they can't be strong everywhere. That's why US soliders die all the time in wars of occupation - you can have the fanciest weapons around but if the bad guy pops up while you're buying a coke you're done for.

    38. Re:Huh by dragonturtle69 · · Score: 1

      Name the individual carried automatic weapons, by the Wehrmacht, in 1939.

      --
      "What luck for the rulers that men do not think." - Adolph Hitler
    39. Re:Huh by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      It was widely known that "the average British soldier can't shoot a bucket at 10 paces" - I dont imagine that other soldiers were significantly better. The pigeons were fairly safe from soldiers. Carbon Monoxide from flue gasses was probably a bigger risk!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    40. Re:Huh by In+hydraulis · · Score: 1
      The MG 34?

      From Wikipedia:

      The MG 34 combined four substantial advantages over other machine guns: 1. mobility, being light enough to be carried by a single soldier; 2. an astonishing rate of fire of up to 800 to 900 rounds per minute; 3. the ability of the gun to sustain that fire; and 4. an effective range of over 2,000 meters.

    41. Re:Huh by dragonturtle69 · · Score: 1

      From the same Wiki article:

      Although the 34 was very reliable and dominant on the battlefield, its dissemination throughout the German forces was hampered due to its precision engineering, which resulted in high production costs and a relatively slower rate of production.

      Like a lot of the German stuff, really good quality is reported, but too few were made to really matter. Tiger versus Sherman is another example.

      While there were opportunities, they common soldier ended up with the Karabiner 98 Kurz, a bolt action rifle with a five round internal magazine, through the end of the war.

      The Germans had better tech and manufacturing, sorta like they do now, only their elected leadership really sucked. Those advantages were wasted starting WW II.

      A lesson may be in here somewhere, about voting with one's mind, and not one's heart. Sorta like me and GB II in 2000.

      Back on topic, it will be interesting when the message is decoded.

      --
      "What luck for the rulers that men do not think." - Adolph Hitler
    42. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you bail out of your boat into the lifeboat carrying your radio and acid batteries.

      In the stormy sea you carefully wrap your technician and your equipment in a heavy plastic shelter. The remainder of the team pump in air while the technician carefully dries and wires up his radio.

      While repeating his encrypted broadcast for the umpteenth time, a mangled version gets picked up by listening stations on a far away coast.

      The enemy (for the listening stations are not friendly) triangulate and scramble a captured rescue plane to "rescue" the half-drowned sailors (and, more importantly, their cypher keys).

      Etc, etc.

      No, they just used the tried and tested pigeon.

      And then, many years later, a member of the free world (or at least, more free than we had any reason to expect) turns up and, in the over-privilged, TV "educated" manner typically of the time, makes wild and idiotic assumptions. And still manages a "3 insightful" on /.

    43. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As early as the Civil War, the smarter generals were pointing out the stupidity of charging cavalry against modern rifled weapons. And yet the last cavelry charge occurred 80 years later!

      Are you suggesting that the pigeon was downed by the German anti-pigeon artillery?

      For what I know, (airdropped) pigeons were used by the resitance in occupied france. And yes, stupid as it sounds, germans used trained falcons to intercept them.

  35. Quadruple ROT-13'd For Extra Security by NotSanguine · · Score: 1

    Now that's what I'm talkin' about!

    --
    No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
  36. No, no, you misread it means undie-coded. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The message was hidden within the lace of avian lingerie.

  37. Activation code by bjb_admin · · Score: 1

    Actually this is the second part of a message.

    First Message reads:
    Sorry to hear of the russian porn infecting your computer old chap.

    Will send activation code once we can get through to India so you can reinstall.

  38. He finally did it! by darth_borehd · · Score: 1

    Dick Dastardly finally stopped that pigeon!

  39. hyperspace express way notice by dsvick · · Score: 5, Funny

    Actually, it says:

    Notice of intent to build a hyperspace express route is hereby given to the peoples of earth.
    Plans and demolition orders may be viewed at your local planning office in Alpha Centauri.
    Thank you,
    Galactic Hyperspace Planning Council

    1. Re:hyperspace express way notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glad to see intergalactic bureaucracy also slows progress down to the tune of 7-8 decades...

  40. there's a PS, there, too by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

    did you guys catch it?

    decoded it says:

    "PS: if you didn't get this message, let us know and we'll send it again"

    (you know, I bet the sender had one of those fake paint-on moustaches.)

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  41. I know why this happened... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    Santa stepped on the pigeon by accident, killed it dead....

  42. Don't decode it! by slapout · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't decode it! It's a copy of the funniest joke in the world! It's in coded form so that it won't hurt anyone!

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  43. RFC 1149 : TCP over Carrier Pigeon by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 3, Funny
    Well, the reason it's so hard to decode is obviously because it doesn't follow standards that did not yet exist: RFC 1149:- Standard for the transmission of IP datagrams on avia

    .

    If people only used standards, then even multi-decades old avian-datagrams could route around the blockage of chimneys and continue onward! ;>)

    .

    The RFC even discusses encryption and tactical issues: ``Security Considerations Security is not generally a problem in normal operation, but special measures must be taken (such as data encryption) when avian carriers are used in a tactical environment.'' This BBN place sounds like a fun place to work if they've got this much time on their hands!

  44. AOAKN .HVPKD FNFJU YIDDC by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Transcription based on
    http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/11/01/article-2226203-15CC0406000005DC-295_306x423.jpg
    and
    http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/11/01/article-2226203-15CC0406000005DC-763_634x286.jpg

    Transcription assumes all capital letters and no numbers in the encoded message.
    --cut here--
    [TOP LINE NOT SHOWN IN IMAGE]
    TO X02
    FROM [NOT FILLED OUT]
    Originator's No. [NOT FILLED OUT]
    Date. [NOT FILLED OUT
    In reply to No. [NOT FILLED OUT]

    AOAKN .HVPKD FNFJU YIDDC
    RQXSR DJHFP GOVFN MAIPX .
    PABUZ WYYNP CMPNW HJRZH .
    NLXKG MEMKK ONOIB AKEEQ
    UAOTA . RBQRH DJOFM TPZEH
    LKXEH REEHT JRZCQ FNKTQ .
    KLDTS PQIRU[FQIRU?] AOAKN 27 1525/6.

    NURP 40 TW 194
    NURP 37 OK 76

    [cursive] lib. [normal print] 1625

    Time of origin. 1522
    Date and time of return at loft [not filled out]
    Number of copies sent. 2

    Sender's Signature [line illegible/best guess] W St[?]t Sjt.
    --cut here--

    Transcriber's note:
    Dots/periods in the body of the message are probably not part of the encrypted message.
    The dot in the first line is somewhat below the letter H in the second grouping.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:AOAKN .HVPKD FNFJU YIDDC by BurstElement · · Score: 1

      NURP 40 TW 194
      NURP 37 OK 76

      Just speculating but I wonder if NURP = Non-unit related personnel (aka civilians etc.)...
      The numbers could be grid references along with information relating to their preparedness for attack.
      TW = Threat Watch?
      OK = Order Known?

    2. Re:AOAKN .HVPKD FNFJU YIDDC by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Nope - as a previous posting says, those are the ID numbers of the carrier pigeons. I quote:

      "(NURP stands for National Union of Racing Pigeons). This probably has nothing to do with the message. The 40 and 37 indicate the year of registration and TW194 and DK76 are the "serial numbers" of the pigeon."

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  45. How it got there by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Funny

    It entered the chimney because it was pining for the fjords.

    It's not pinin,' it's passed on! This pigeon is no more! It has ceased to be! It's expired and gone to meet its maker! This is a late pigeon! It's a stiff! Bereft of life, it rests in peace! If you hadn't nailed him to the perch he would be pushing up the daisies! Its metabolical processes are of interest only to historians! It's hopped the twig! It's shuffled off this mortal coil! It's run down the curtain and joined the choir invisible! This.... is an EX-PIGEON!

    1. Re:How it got there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It's not pinin,' it's passed on! This pigeon is no more! It has ceased to be! It's expired and gone to meet its maker! This is a late pigeon! It's a stiff! Bereft of life, it rests in peace! If you hadn't nailed him to the perch he would be pushing up the daisies! Its metabolical processes are of interest only to historians! It's hopped the twig! It's shuffled off this mortal coil! It's run down the curtain and joined the choir invisible! This.... is an EX-PIGEON!

      Nah, it's just resting a little.

    2. Re:How it got there by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry Mr Perens, it needs two or more Pythonians together to perform The Parrot Sketch. Or do you know more than you should about your FBI and/or RIAA surveillance teams?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  46. Tnetennba is no longer the longest Countdown word by patmandu · · Score: 1

    Obviously it already is a word, and now unseats Tnetennba as Moss' longest countdown word.

  47. Decoded by TheBrando · · Score: 2

    It says, "Please send new carrier pigeon. This one continues to get lost."

  48. Decoded Message Reads by Ashenkase · · Score: 1

    "First post! Suck it Hitler!"

  49. Re:Undecoded by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    "encrypted"

  50. says the US government by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    The data you put on a pigeon's leg is no longer your property says the US government

    1. Re: says the US government by geekoid · · Score: 1

      And they would be correct.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  51. Deciphered: by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    "Please save my friend, Big Bird, from the flippy guy who looks like a game-show host!"

    1. Re:Deciphered: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you save us from lame and uninformed jokes by leaving Slashdot?

    2. Re:Deciphered: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Show he's not flippy

  52. The life that I have / Is all that I have by alanw · · Score: 1

            The life that I have
            Is all that I have
            And the life that I have
            Is yours.

            The love that I have
            Of the life that I have
            Is yours and yours and yours.

            A sleep I shall have
            A rest I shall have
            Yet death will be but a pause.

            For the peace of my years
            In the long green grass
            Will be yours and yours and yours

    Somewhere in The Doughnut, a cryptographer is trying to use Violette Szabo's emergency one-time pad code poem to decrypt the message.

    Leo Marks' life was truly amazing. Read more at his IMDB entry, (bio & trivia)

  53. Enough with the 11s by lucm · · Score: 2

    11 is getting crowded with 11/11, 9/11 and 7/11. I suggest that the next important event or big convenience store chain use another common denominator.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
    1. Re:Enough with the 11s by geekoid · · Score: 2

      yes, we will be sure the next big event doesn't happen in 2011.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  54. It says: by billybob_jcv · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hello, I am a Prince of the Nairobi Royal Family and I need your help...

  55. Message decoded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The answer is 42

  56. All ur base... by DontBlameCanada · · Score: 1

    R belong to us!

  57. Ping time by kryliss · · Score: 1

    2207520000000 ms ping time....? Packet dropped?

    --
    --- If the bible proves the existence of God, then Superman comics prove the existence of Superman.
  58. Re:Undecoded by Shatrat · · Score: 2

    It will still be encrypted after we have figured out what the plain text is. It will no longer be undecoded, though.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  59. NURP by slew · · Score: 3, Informative

    FWIW, the NURP... at the end of the message simply identifies the carrier pigeons (NURP stands for National Union of Racing Pigeons).
    This probably has nothing to do with the message.

    The 40 and 37 indicate the year of registration and TW194 and DK76 are the "serial numbers" of the pigeon.

    1. Re:NURP by smitsco · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the information.

      The original news article should have mentioned that. They would have had the number on the message ring.

  60. Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Send More Chuck Berry"

  61. Important message from Little Orphan Annie by Grayhand · · Score: 1

    It decoded as "drink your Ovaltine".

  62. Re:Undecoded by geekoid · · Score: 1

    no it's horrid. 'encoded' is the correct word.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  63. Some hints regarding the message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The paper with the encoded message they show in the BBC video is probably a fake. A very informative New York Times article shows probably the original message. Bletchley Park shows the same picture in their publication.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/02/world/europe/world-war-ii-pigeons-message-a-mystery.html?smid=pl-share
    http://www.bletchleypark.org/news/docview.rhtm/675670

    NURP 40 TW 194 and NURP 37 DK 76 identify the pigeons bearing the message, the numbers 40 and 37 identify the year of birth. 27 is simply the number of code groups and 1525 is probably the time of the encryption. If the message is indeed from D-Day the time would be plausible, because the troops operated off the beaches at this time. Note that the first and the last code group are repeated and are probably not part of the actual ciphertext. The frequency distribution of the letters suggest a substitution cipher.

  64. Someone wrote this somewhere on teh net: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "NURP was a code for a specific bird. A couple of the pigeons awarded the Dicken medal are know only by their NURP numbers. This suggests to me that two birds were released. As XO2 was Bomber Command HQ, the implication is that two birds were released by a bomber to confirm SOMETHING. Now if the bird's ring still exists and it should, somewhere the number will show up in old RAF records as being signed for by some W/T Operator. If the other bird arrived safe, the message will exist in its decoded form---maybe."

    Another point, another place on teh net:
    "If this is coded using a one time pad it will be impossible to decode without the corresponding pad."

  65. Decipher and reconstruct by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

    The pigeon. Carrier Pigeons are extinct, maybe they can take the DNA and do a Jurasic Park on it and bring them back. Proably less scary than a Rapor. Or was that passenger pigeon? which is not with us any longer?

  66. Isn't the Message Obvious? by Compulawyer · · Score: 1

    It says: Hello sweetie!

    --

    Laws affecting technology will always be bad until enough techies become lawyers.

  67. It says: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Help, stuck in chimney. Send rope."

  68. So buffer bloat finally comes home to roost? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    The delays really are getting out of hand.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  69. hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PIDGEON LSD?

  70. SETEC ASTRONOMY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I decoded it:
    "No more secrets"

    If that doesn't work, try the key "Joshua".

  71. Orders by PPH · · Score: 1

    1. Proceed directly to Trafalgar Square.
    2. Locate Lord Nelson's Column.
    3. Bombs away (pigeon style).

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  72. don't decode it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wenn ist das Nunnstück git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!

  73. I Know what it says!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the Shooting Schedule for "Sherlock"

  74. Perspective... by scooter.higher · · Score: 1

    What if this message was not written by the Brits for the Brits? What if it was a message from one enemy spy to another? I couldn't tell from TFS or TFA if this was definitely a message by a friendly or an adversary. Very interesting either way.

    --
    Ramen
    1. Re:Perspective... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      The canister in which the message was found is of a type known to have been used by SOE (British spies ans saboteurs working in Fortress Europa). It's not impossible that it was an attempt by the German spooks to double-bluff the Allies ... but you're stretching it a bit thin.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    2. Re:Perspective... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it may be a bit thin, but I was adding to the discussion more than another comment about the usage of "undecoded"...

  75. A hama sandwich? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    'Pidgin'. That's the word you're looking for.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  76. Check the archives. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    Checking the archives of SOE, the spy training schools (probably at GCHQ these days) and anything similar has a fair chance of revealing what classes cypher/ encryption were in routine use in the appropriate time interval. Which is a significant step to speeding up the overall task.

    It would be wildly optimistic to hope to come across a decoded report from a spy that said "I told you last week that [...something..] but you've not acknowledged receipt of that news". But weirder things have happened.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  77. Re:Undecoded by Maritz · · Score: 1

    Perfectly unambiguous to me, big deal, who cares... ;)

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  78. Looks like it might be a running-key cipher by metaforest · · Score: 1

    cipher text body:

    "HVPKD FNFJU YIDDC RQXSR DJHFP GOVFN MIAPX PABUZ WYYNP CMPNW HJRZH NLXKG NENKK ONOIB AKEEQ UAGTA RBQRH DJOFM TPZEH LKXGH RGGHT JRZCQ FNKTQ KLDTS GQIRU"

    Key ID reference, and offset into key material:
    "AOAKN 27 1525/6

    Gonna be real hard to crack this without knowing what the key material was, or what typical material might have been. Could have been a popular book, or even a poem... (ala poem code) though the ACA stats don't point to a pure poem code.

    Some odd bits:

    The time codes:
    "lib 1625" (liberation? of the pigeons)
    Time of Origination: "1522"
    This makes sense as time stamps for the process of the time from the command to write/encipher the message, until the time the birds were given their payloads and released.

    However the "27 1525/6" trailing the message body does not make sense as a time stamp.

    The pigeon serial numbers:
    NURP 40TW 194
    NURP 37DK 76

    Indicate one pigeon was commissioned in 1940, and the other in 1937. The ex-pidgeon was 40TW 194...
    Depending on how well the RAF took care of their birds, this message could have been coded anytime between 1940 and then end of the war.
    Wild pigeons live 3 - 5 years, but domesticated ones can live typically 10 - 15 years without difficulty. I'm gonna guess mortality rate was fairly high. so bird 37DK 76 places a stiffer upper limit on the date... but it still might have been near D-Day.

    from: http://bionsgadgets.appspot.com/gadget_forms/refscore.html

    Number of standard deviations from averages for each cipher type:

    RunningKey 4
    Periodic gromark 5
    Progkey beaufort 5
    Progressivekey 5
    Randomtext 5
    [...]

    The raw histograms doesn't point to a OTP... it looks all wrong for a 125 char message. it should be much flatter. And there would be no need for the "AOAKN" header and footer. Also OTP is really not very good idea for a forward SOE unit... too easy to lose, or be caught with.

    Another odd bit about this whole story. Historians who have commented on this story elsewhere seem to think it was extremely rare for birds to carry enciphered payloads. The vast majority during WW2 carried plaintext. I am assuming that this was due to protocol rather than some notion that birds were considered a secure transport.