Slashdot Mirror


Do Recreational Drugs Help Programmers?

jfruh writes "Among the winners of last night's election: marijuana users. Voters in both Washington and Colorado approved referenda that legalized marijuana for recreational use, though the drug remains illegal under federal law. There's been a long-standing debate among programmers as to whether recreational drugs, including pot and hallucinagens like LSD, can actually help programmers code. Don't forget, there was a substantial overlap between the wave of computer professionals who came of age in the '60s and that era's counterculture." (There's even a good book on that topic.)

54 of 878 comments (clear)

  1. Caffine by davidwr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Absolutely.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Caffine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Perhaps you need another cup; it's "caffeine".

    2. Re:Caffine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is why caffeine usage should be on a sawtooth shaped cycle. You keep ramping up usage as you get tolerance, then you need to take a week off. If things work out well, you can synchronize that schedule with other slow points in your work and hobby schedules too.

    3. Re:Caffine by Chrutil · · Score: 5, Funny

      was anybody talking to you, faggot? if you value your health, you better shut the fuck up too.

      Dude, decaf.

  2. maybe by pablo_max · · Score: 5, Funny

    I will program something while not being high and see if it makes a difference, later though. So far I am still collecting data points.

    1. Re:maybe by andrew2325 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The down side is the majority of the hippies that did a lot of drugs died young. From my own experience, its a bad idea to try to accomplish anything high. Coming from a guy who has done drugs, you'd be much better suited for your position sober. I would not employ you if I knew you were on drugs either. Get your lives together.

    2. Re:maybe by MozeeToby · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't think the idea is you code while high. I think the idea is that getting high last night affects the way your brain works today. Either because of simple stress relief or something more complicated. LSD in particular is known to have serious and long lasting effects on brain function, and not all of them negative. For example, a single dose of LSD can increase the chances of an alcoholic staying sober by a significant margin, significant enough that if it weren't for the stigma associated with it it would probably be part of standard rehab.

    3. Re:maybe by durrr · · Score: 5, Funny

      Here's a video of the drugged spiders
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1n15JxrBJ8

    4. Re:maybe by SolitaryMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As I've heard somebody say (my experience confirms it too): "People on drugs think they are creative and productive. Everyone else thinks they are on drugs." The same can be said about alcohol.

      --
      May Peace Prevail On Earth
    5. Re:maybe by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Further proof that the metric system is hazardous to your health.

    6. Re:maybe by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There's some evidence that humans shouldn't use marijuana if they are young and their brains are still developing:

      I would be very surprised if there wasn't evidence, since it seems self-evident that any psychoactive drug is going to affect a developing brain in some way or another. Which is one of many reasons drug laws are stupid: It's easier for a kid to buy pot than for an adult. This is ass-backwards.

    7. Re:maybe by Jeng · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Although I was raised around drugs and I smoke pot on a regular basis I know for me that is not a good idea to get stoned at work, for two reasons.

      1) I'm trying to get a job done, but I am impaired so I can't do my job well.

      2) I'm trying to enjoy this high, but I am concentrating on getting my damn job done so I can't enjoy the high.

      So for me it is a waste of time and a waste of weed to get high at work.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    8. Re:maybe by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's as far as you got? I wrote an entire content management system while stoned.

      It worked pretty well, only problem was that I could never remember how it worked for some reason.

      Oh, you're the bozo who coded Lotus Notes? At least there was a reason for it.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    9. Re:maybe by TheRealGrogan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It sounds like that is based on very limited personal experience.

      I have been smoking cannabis for more than 35 years and it is nothing but an enhancement to me (well... unless used excessively all day or something). To long time users, it's more like having a cup of coffee than an intoxicant. While it is and we have to be a bit discrete, we don't even think of it as an "illegal drug" when we use it either alone or in social settings, but then, this is Canada where we don't believe American propaganda.

      Hippies didn't necessarily die young because of drugs (at least not marijuana and not likely LSD either). There are other common factors and lifestyle choices that come into play. I have friends in their 70's who still smoke cannabis several times a day, by the way.

      Most all of the harm from cannabis comes from the drug laws, and extrajudicial mechanisms that serve only to ostracize people who defy those laws. For example it is absolutely disingenuous to test urine for cannabis and use the presence of non pharmacologically active metabolites that may persist for weeks or months, to discriminate against people for employment or any other purpose. Hair follicle testing is even more sinister. They are always testing for past use. Even blood tests, while more accurate, immediate and having the possibility to be quantitative, can detect it for up to 4 days.

      Funny how the harm is directly related to society. In places where it's legal/ignored and tolerated, there is far less harm than in an authority driven place like America where the public is so brainwashed that they actively participate in the injustice. You've really got to see cannabis use without the stigmata, to understand this. It doesn't affect your family either, when it's tolerated. In fact it can be a "god send" (not my words) when chosen over alcohol abuse. When people aren't punished by society for it, they keep their jobs and/or businesses, they own homes, have families, raise bright kids who go on to higher education just like "normal" people etc.

      The answer to the main question in the article "Do Recreational Drugs Help Programmers?" can only be that it depends on the individual, the drugs in question and the circumstances. It is my opinion that someone who doesn't use drugs would almost certainly be affected adversely if they suddenly got intoxicated or over stimulated and tried to code. Drugs don't affect all individuals the same, either. I know some people who just CAN'T use cannabis for example.

  3. tht depends by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is the pot free as in beer or free as in speech

    --
    ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  4. Spice by a-zarkon! · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is by will alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the juice of Sapho that thoughts acquire speed, the lips acquire stains. The stains become a warning. It is by will alone I set my mind in motion

  5. inpaired thinking = bad coding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would expect code produced under the influence to have more bugs, less comments and generally be an unmaintainable mess.

    1. Re:inpaired thinking = bad coding by AdmiralXyz · · Score: 5, Funny

      I would expect code produced under the influence to have more bugs, less comments and generally be an unmaintainable mess.

      Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion man.

      --
      Dislike the Electoral College? Lobby your state to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.
  6. Impossible to Say by OG · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Those who do will of course say that it does and will provide anecdotal evidence (although I'm sure most of them have not actually performed any controlled tests to verify that claim). Most studies would indicate that drugs would not aid in many of the mental processes involved in programming, but that won't change anyone's mind, and I definitive statement can't be made until studies are done to specifically test this assertion.

  7. I guess we'll see by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Voters in both Washington and Colorado approved referenda that legalized marijuana for recreational use

    Valve Corporation is an American video game development and digital distribution company based in Bellevue, Washington, United States.

    If HL2:EP3 finally comes out, I guess we'll know what to thank.

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
  8. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You forget how stunningly crap the spec and use cases you've been provided are?

  9. Don't bother with the article by pavon · · Score: 4, Informative

    In case you were tempted to RTFA, don't. You have to click through two ad-laden pages, and there really isn't any more information than in the summary.

  10. Not exactly by JeremyMorgan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But I would argue that the type of person who would try recreational drugs is also the type of person that might get into programming. Curious, risk taking and someone who doesn't want to be told what to do or fit into a mold? Yeah sounds about right.

  11. Logical fallacy in assuming drugs help by concealment · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Drugs do things to your brain that make you realize certain things.

    The fallacy is assuming that the only path to these realizations come through drugs.

    (It's worth mentioning that drugs have numerous downsides as well.)

    If you learn to meditate, or for those with aversion to religion to "think hard," you'll get everything you could from drugs.

    This isn't an anti-drug argument; that's for someone else's thread. It's an argument against assuming drugs can give you something that can't get another way.

    If the potential is within the mind, clearly it's the important element, not the drugs.

    1. Re:Logical fallacy in assuming drugs help by tylikcat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've done a lot of meditation (I am a chan Buddhist, live in a zen center*, and spend an awful lot of time sitting on a pillow, staring at the wall in addition to my other primary occupation of neurobiology and martial arts). I've done a smaller amount of recreational drugs (and not recently, but I'm not particularly against them).

      I think the comparison between meditative states and those acchieved through drugs is overblown. Oh, there are some overlaps - both my own experience and the literature calls out the use of psilocybin in particular as creating lasting deeply significant insights, and there are certain plenty of examples of drug experiences that in some way mimic enlightenment experiences - but I think there's actually a lot more difference. That they're so often compared might be in part a legacy of the sixties.

      Drugs are just a tool. They produce various effects, and can be used more or less (less explicitly including negative values here) usefully. As a society we've created some fairly arbitrary distinctions between drugs. I personally generally tend towards the "less is more" aesthetic... but I'm hardly an absolutist, and I think there's a lot of room for individual variation.

      * Yes, I'm using the same word in two languages - the order I belong to is of Chinese origin, and I speak Chinese, and I live in a zen hall affiliated with a lineage of Japanese extraction.

  12. short term gain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You end up with a short term gain and long term problems. Anyone who tells you different has not reached the other end yet.

    For example aderall lets you concentrate to a very effective degree. Until you start need to up the dose to get the same effect. Then you give up and are a wreck for it.

    Cocaine makes you spazzy.

    Codine sorts of things makes you relaxed and happy until you are full blown addicted to it.

    Caffeine makes you a 'bit spazzy' but long term you keep having to up the dose to get the same effect. Then trying to quit = massive I am going to throw up my lungs headaches.

    Weed makes you mellow. But eventually you get paranoid.

    So yes you can 'hack' your body. But remember sometimes what you do can NOT be undone.

    Don't forget, there was a substantial overlap between the wave of computer professionals who came of age in the '60s and that era's counterculture
    And there was a non significant number that did not touch it. You are trying to justify a position with spurious thinking. This is usually the words of someone who is doing something they know is stupid yet want to justify it in some way. Just man up and say 'I am doing something stupid'.

  13. Re:What? by Firethorn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In this case, probably non-conventional logic; computers don't operate the way human brains do, it takes a twisted head to program well. Especially if you're attempting to optimize a system using low level programming languages.

    Of course, I've said before: Drug tests are mostly to attempt to filter out incompetent low level employees, trending a bit upwards when they're operating dangerous equipment. By the time you're a serious professional, I figure the general attitude is that they don't want to know, but secretly expect you to be able to handle your recreational drug use. IE the difference between a lawyer and a burger flipper is the Lawyer is expected to know how to handle his cocaine habit. IE as long as his performance doesn't degrade unacceptably, he's good.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  14. Eh it all comes down to moderation by areusche · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As with anything, moderation is key. As I remember from my college days there are a few times where I got so out of it I was couched locked and did not want to do anything.

    The typical drug war debate aside, I personally wouldn't toke up every time I had to program. I know how it affects me and sometimes being sober for work is a good thing. Just keep it simple and enjoy it as a treat when your work is done. Just like one would treat alcohol.

    The body compensates to anything one throws at it to make up for the temporary gains. It's a zero sum gain sadly. Just enjoy it as a treat or treatment if you really need it for a disease/disability.

  15. Dealing with Management by micron · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Recreational drugs serve more as a device to cope with Management than they do for any other aspects of developing code.

  16. Re:No, but stoners THINK it does by Triv · · Score: 4, Informative

    Your friend was doing it wrong. The intoxicant helps draw connections between things you wouldn't've necessarily thought to connect beforehand, gives you ideas, sends you off in an unexpected direction.

    The work that derives from that initial idea, the actual making stuff of it, should be done sober.

  17. Obligatory xkcd by TennCasey · · Score: 4, Funny
  18. Re:LSD and Unix by acariquara · · Score: 4, Funny

    What about crack cocaine and Windows ME?

    --
    Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  19. Hellz Yeah. by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Funny

    When I was on the Windows 8 UI development team, we all were taking Meth and PCP daily. And look at the wonderful and innovative design we came up with!

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  20. No by Chemisor · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is your code:

    int factorial (int n)
    {
        int r = 1;
        for (int i = 1; i < n; ++i)
            r *= i;
        return (r);
    }

    This is your code on drugs:

    f(int n){int i=n,r;l:r=(i!=n?r*i:unix);if (--i)goto l;return (r);}

    Any questions?

  21. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Drug tests are a dumb american war on drugs phenomenon. Nobody in Canada or the rest of the world takes them.

    If you can't filter out incompetent employees without a cup of urine, you fail at HR 101.

  22. Recreation vs Programming by progician · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For my part, I obviously don't use illegal drugs at work and I'm doing fine. But I can see that most of the programmers, including me, using energy drinks, or shit load of coffee. It seems obvious to me that caffeine is a great drug for programming as much for most of other jobs and activities.

    Sometimes at home however, I like to smoke a spliff, read some code on the Github which eventually results in coding my own projects after a while. I have never used any stronger stuff for programming, because it doesn't make much sense for me. While you can get some inspiration, programming is a very focused activity with little room for being dreamy, thus I would say that anything that is stronger than a lightly made joint would be counter-productive for coding.

    I suggest, recreational drugs should belong to our recreational time. Many geeks I know has a huge problem with separating from the computer, at least a little recreational time should detach us from the matrix.

  23. Re:This Is Disgusting And Sick by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While I agree that you shouldn't mod GP down because of disagreeing...I do believe GP should be modded down. He uses inflammatory and trolling language.

    "This Is Disgusting And Sick"? Filthy, vile, and destructive? Timothy is irresponsible and should be fired?

    This is exactly the kind of language that stops thoughtful discussion, and should be discouraged accordingly by the mods.

    Whatever your opinion is of recreational drugs, this animosity toward people minding their own business in the privacy of their own home is reminiscent of those who think violent video games caused the Columbine massacre and other real-world violence. It is a simple fact that humans generally consumes large amounts of chemicals that alter the way our mind and body work, and our society generally manages to do just fine. And just like some people will be violent psychopaths who just happen to be gamers, some people will self destruct who just happen to use recreational drugs.

    --
    :(){ :|:& };:
  24. Re:What? by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cite your claim that Shakespeare ascribed a "profound positive effect" to cannabis on his creative process, please. (And from a publication of a university press, not a pot advocacy website or similar).

  25. Re:What? by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Creative programming and creative problem solving. Brian Wilson. Shakespeare, Carl Sagan, Paul McCartney...

    Correlation is not causation. Maybe they were just creative people. Period.

    Millions of non-creative pot smokers nationwide will back up this hypothesis.

    --
    No sig today...
  26. Depends on Strain of Pot by Psyborgue · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Most people don't know Pot comes in a very wide variety of effects (and side effects). Some might make a person drowsy while another might make a person more alert. One might have a side effect of affecting short term memory. Another strain might not, but cause something else. Some strains might very well be useful for coding. There are lots of Sativa dominant strains that are very similar to amphetamines / caffiene, in that they have a stimulant effect and in many people tend to stimulate creativity. It's really impossible to say definitively marijuana does this or that with so many varieties around. Many American recreational users are just concerned with raw THC content when this matters very little (it's the balance of different Cannabinoids that makes the difference). The government's lack of attention to this issue in their propaganda does little to help. Medical users, on the other hand, have known these things for decades. You have one strain for the day, and one for the night time. If you're going to try pot, my recommendation is to do your research. Start off with an Indica dominant strain unlikely to cause paranoia (the most unpleasant side effect), and graduate up to something that is a little more cerebral and leaves you less drowsy. My personal recommendation is Hindu Kush. It's a very calming, typical Indica smoke but at the same time is totally like other Indicas in that it won't leave you drowsy

  27. Re:What? by tftp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Creative programming and creative problem solving.

    Majority of coding work is not creative. Take an interactive form with 20 fields in WPF, for example - with data binding, with triggers, with validators.

    I'm not even sure what coding is creative these days. Perhaps yet another scheduler for Linux? That certainly would be very creative. But even a driver for Linux is 99% slogging through the datasheets and through the sample code. For that you need clear mind, and not this.

    By the time the tasks are allocated to coders the problems are already cut into bite-sized chunks - forms, interfaces, graphics, styles, database schema, etc. Real problem solving usually starts at a higher level, during system design. What does the customer really want here? What hardware and software should we select, and why? What are the risks? How much it will cost? How could the impossible task X be done at all? What is the plan B? Who is going to do this and that? But you'd better not be drugged out of your mind when you answer those questions.

  28. Tricky question by Graham+J+-+XVI · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a fun topic to debate but the question is pretty fuzzy. "Recreational drugs" vary so widely in their effects that you can't really say anything about all of them at once. "Help" is also a subjective term that would need to be further defined to have any meaningful discussion.

    I'll also put out there that anyone who hasn't done much of them is unqualified to answer.

    Personally, and speaking very generally, ie. the way this question would typically be taken, I would say that they do not help. More specifically:

    - Depressants such as pot and alcohol can help you think more creatively but tend to erode motivation and coding accuracy/efficiency.
    - Hallucinogens (LSD, DMT, MDA, 2CB, shrooms etc) in normal doses also help creativity but will usually make interacting with the computer difficult or impossible. At very low doses (see LSD microdosing) there can be potential for augmenting sharpness of mind and attention.
    - Most energetic stimulants (cocaine, meth, crystal, crack) make you too wired to sit still and focus on a task like programming. Way too little attention span.
    - Speed is an exception to the above. With lower doses it can help keep you focused and awake almost indefinitely without being foggy. This the one drug I would say has the ability to help, even if it doesn't allow you to do anything you couldn't already with willpower and enough Jolt.
    - MDMA (ecstasy) I consider a class on its own. Coming up with and talking about programming ideas could work very well but sitting in front of a computer doing a task that needs a clear head would definitely be problematic due to the mashy fogginess. Besides, why code when you could be hugging someone or dancing?
    - I couldn't tell you about heroin but from what I've seen in movies it doesn't look like something you can code on at all!

    FWIW I've been coding for about 30 years. Hope this helps :)

  29. Re:What? by Fast+Thick+Pants · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
    A stately pleasure-dome decree...

  30. Re:What? by MozeeToby · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How about: Write something whiled doped. Read that when sobered up. Pick out the good bits. Write it into a coherent story, edit, publish. I suspect that is much closer to the way most writers use drugs to increase creativity. Good writing is only 5% creative ideas, but that 5% can destroy an otherwise gifted author's career if it just won't show up to the party. The idea is that the sober brain has a lot of filters that stop 'stupid' thoughts making it up to the conscious level, getting doped relaxes those filters letting a lot of stupid stuff through. But like any piece of filtering software, sometimes there are false positives, and those false positives are more likely to be groundbreakingly creative ideas simply by their nature of being so close to the stupid line.

  31. Re:What? by NatasRevol · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unfortunately, all of our HR employees are stoned.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  32. I can sleep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Pot takes my mind away from programming, when is time to sleep. It also makes me a lot more relaxed, and interested on the silly things my kid wants to do. After a day of blasting my brain with logic and debugging, inhaling some canabinoids through a vaporizer, helps me get my mind away from the stress from work, without the side effects of pharmaceutical headache otc medicine. I don't smoke weed when I am at work, but my best programming and design ideas come in when I am stoned. I write them down, and then review then the next day. I am one of the top contributors, get bonuses every year, and my life couldn't be happier and healthier. Also Washington state rules. Take that Oregon!

    1. Re:I can sleep by Progman3K · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I knew it.. Windows terrible design is based off weed!

      No, if it were weed, it would be incomplete.

      The pattern resembles caffeine more than weed.

      There's a famous study that was done about the effects of drugs on the ability of spiders to spin webs.

      Web-spinning resembles coding to a degree, both are engineering tasks, both have to be completed in a timely manner or the author starves.

      What they found was caffeine made the spiders very productive, but rather sloppy. That sounds like Windows to a T.

      Weed on the other hand made the spiders do very detailed, ornate work, but they seemed to have wandering minds, get bored and leave their webs unfinished. I don't know what OS that would correspond to.

      LSD had the effect of the spiders becoming very parsimonious with their effort. Webs constructed by LSD-spiders are typically minimal but very elegant. This makes me believe that Unix was probably dreamed up by some acid-heads.

      The study
      http://www.trinity.edu/jdunn/spiderdrugs.htm

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
  33. Re:What? by tftp · · Score: 5, Funny

    Majority of coding work should be preemptive coding for scalability.

    PHB: Listen, Bill, I have a small programming task for you. We need an application that pops a dialog up, asks for a number, and appends that number, as plain text, to a file. Could you put this together before lunch?

    Bill: Hey, boss, this is a major undertaking. Since we want to ensure scalability of this application I need to make it so it accepts a form definition language, parses it, executes scripts in another language, and then spits it into a variable, programmable set of databases which could be plain text files as you want, or ODBC connections, or The Cloud. Of course we want strong crypto on all that, and biometric authentication at every step. My team of ten will probably do it within a year or two.

    PHB: Bill, are you high?

  34. Re:The other side of the coin by jhoegl · · Score: 4, Funny

    No Mountain Dew and you call yourself a programmer?
    I doubt your story based on that! :)

  35. Re:The other side of the coin by bunuel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I almost never drink coffee or tea with caffeine. Not that I'm against them, I just don't like them, I prefer herbal teas. No Mtn Dew or Cola either.

    The problem is when I do need some caffeine (Monday overflow or something) if I drink a small cup of regular coffee, I get all anxious and shaky, my pulse increases and overall I feel bad. So, if I didn't get enough sleep, coffee does not make me feel better.

    This happens to me with weed... I generally have a better experience with it if I'm using it regularly. If I let my tolerance get too low it makes me uncomfortably anxious and paranoid. I've heard other people say this too.

  36. Re:What? by jest3r · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well ... it's a bit of a stretch ... but quoted from Scientific American and BBC news ...

    In the current issue of the South African Journal of Science, Francis Thackeray of the Transvaal Museum in Pretoria and his colleagues document the presence of cocaine and myristic acid (a plant-derived hallucinogen) in clay-pipe fragments retrieved from the beloved bard's Stratford-Upon-Avon home. Their analysis also hints at the presence of marijuana residues.

    Though the pipe cannot be definitively linked to Shakespeare himself, it is certain that it dates to the 17th century. This fact came as a surprise to the scientists; previously, the earliest known record of cocaine in Europe dated to only 200 years ago.

    http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=shakespeare-on-drugs

  37. Re:Contradictory ... by Jeng · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is not contradictory in the least, he goes home, smokes, relaxes, and in that relaxed state he thinks about his job in a relaxed and creative state and he writes down the ideas and brings them to work.

    What about that is contradictory?

    If you do think it is contradictory do you have personal experience with being high?

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  38. Re:Contradictory ... by Synerg1y · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can be a top contributor and still be stressed... dur. Most people drink a beer or a glass in the evenings to relax, what people have been saying this ENTIRE TIME is that puffing a spliff to achieve that effect is exactly the same.

  39. Re:Contradictory ... by Jeng · · Score: 4, Informative

    The weed relieves the stress and makes him happy.

    It really isn't that difficult to understand.

    I have depression issues, I take anti-depressants, it is not contradictory that the end result is that I am not depressed.

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.