Slashdot Mirror


NASA Fires Up Experimental Space Internet For Robot Control

coondoggie writes "NASA said today it had teamed with the European Space Agency to successfully test an experimental version of an 'interplanetary Internet' to control a robot on the ground in Germany from a laptop onboard the International Space Station."

42 comments

  1. It's not a separate internet by s.petry · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Jeesh, it is a separate network, not a new "internet". People writing technical articles should collaborate with technically skilled people prior to submitting articles. More often than not, they go with option 2 and look foolish to people with technical knowledge. *sigh*

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:It's not a separate internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I fail to see the distinction. What's the difference between a new network and a new internet? When did the internet stop being another network and start being an internet?

    2. Re:It's not a separate internet by nospam007 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Jeesh, it is a separate network, not a new "internet"."

      You mean I cannot spam the robot with lubrication-Ads?

    3. Re:It's not a separate internet by icebike · · Score: 3, Informative

      It was probably up and running all of 47 seconds before the obligatory Frist Post arrived.

      NASA points out the distinction between this network and the internet:

      From NASA: "The core of the DTN suite is the Bundle Protocol (BP), which is roughly equivalent to the Internet Protocol (IP) that serves as the core of the Internet on Earth. While IP assumes a continuous end-to-end data path exists between the user and a remote space system, DTN accounts for disconnections and errors. In DTN, data move through the network "hop-by-hop." While waiting for the next link to become connected, bundles are temporarily stored and then forwarded to the next node when the link becomes available.

      It seems they are paying attention to security, planning for compromised networks, and non-trusted segments, and it is designed to include
      a number of applications including: sensor networks, mobile devices, use of data mules, military communications which involve stressed disconnected and disrupted networks, along with space-based store-and-forward networks.

      That store and forward bit is key, and would be very nice to have here on Earth, if one could find a way to bolt it onto the existing internet. Currently the closest we have is Email and Cellular Text Messages for this type of stuff. Having been cut off from a remote server due to storm damage with only intermittent contact, I can see where it would be nice to have such capability. (To say nothing about political turmoil where governments try to shut down the net.)

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    4. Re:It's not a separate internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, as soon as you join two or more networks together, it becomes an "internet" (or your private "intranet"). Which is what they have done.

      Don't worry. It made sense to the technical people.

    5. Re:It's not a separate internet by Zephyn · · Score: 2

      The name choice is quite simple. If you call it an interplanetary internet, it's much more attractive to interplanetary spammers, thus increasing the chances of making first contact.

      I'd go into further detail, but there's this exiled prince from Gliese 317 who's asking for my help regarding some sort of currency transfer.

    6. Re:It's not a separate internet by KingMotley · · Score: 2

      Having been cut off from a remote server due to storm damage with only intermittent contact, I can see where it would be nice to have such capability.

      So that when you do get connectivity back you spend the next 24 hours getting all the backlogged spam that got dropped?

    7. Re:It's not a separate internet by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should work on your karma a bit, my karma is excellent so I get options to post before most users. Er wait, everything that happens that you can't understand must be a bot right? Or better, it had to be the submitter that did it... there is no other reason for people to post early.

      I didn't mention the security of the network, it's logical. I worked in DOD for nearly a decade, I get security and separation probably better than most. My complaint was that the wording used is completely incorrect, and my statement is still correct..

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    8. Re:It's not a separate internet by icebike · · Score: 1

      Having been cut off from a remote server due to storm damage with only intermittent contact, I can see where it would be nice to have such capability.

      So that when you do get connectivity back you spend the next 24 hours getting all the backlogged spam that got dropped?

      Since email is already Store and Forward, I fail to see your point here. You are going to get that anyway.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    9. Re:It's not a separate internet by icebike · · Score: 1

      Dude, what the hell are you talking about here? Where did I mention anything about posting early?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    10. Re:It's not a separate internet by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      Well the "random" hack attempts that come in every 5 seconds looking for unpatched windows 95/xp boxes on the Internet.

    11. Re:It's not a separate internet by craigminah · · Score: 1

      Are you sure it's an interplanetary network and not an intraplanetary network since it's not technically between two or more planets but rather from LEO to the surface of the same planet?

    12. Re:It's not a separate internet by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      It was probably up and running all of 47 seconds before the obligatory Frist Post arrived.

      GP thought you were referring to this article, I guess.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    13. Re:It's not a separate internet by crutchy · · Score: 1

      agree... i feel sorry for the foolish op who assumed he has technical knowledge.

      ahh that explains it... he's apparently a Senior System Engineer/Architect (inferiority complex much)
      who qualifies themself on slashdot anyway? qualifications aren't required for trolling or pointless arguments... maybe he got confused and thought this was where intelligent conversation occurs

    14. Re:It's not a separate internet by crutchy · · Score: 1

      i think your karma just dropped

    15. Re:It's not a separate internet by crutchy · · Score: 1

      there's this exiled prince from Gliese 317 who's asking for my help regarding some sort of currency transfer

      what!!! i've already patented interplanetary money laundering... expect a visit from my attorney

  2. Interplanetary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Doesn't that require it to involve more then 1 planet?

  3. Keeping up wih the times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is it IPv6?

  4. UUCP and FidoNet.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm, this sounds suspiciously like something we've done before.....

  5. Ping by Sla$hPot · · Score: 2, Funny

    Whats is the ping time for Proxima Centauri gonna be?
    (2260080*2)s + ~10ms ?

    1. Re:Ping by crutchy · · Score: 1

      if both ends ping each other at the same time the pings might collide and form a black hole... it is 2012 after all

  6. Skynet is Activated! by RadiCalMan · · Score: 2

    Will someone please let John Conner know that the latest Skynet activation date is November 8, 2012. Time for another Terminator movie to push the date back again, before it becomes self aware!

    1. Re:Skynet is Activated! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      You *are* aware that the Brits have been running Skynet for the last almost forty years or so?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  7. Robots, space ? by captain_dope_pants · · Score: 3, Funny

    If we're controlling robots from space then I for one welcome our new robotic underlords.

    --
    while (true != false) process_more_stupid_code();
  8. Misleading title by tiffany352 · · Score: 1

    The ISS, as far as I can tell, already has access to the Internet. This is a new set of routing protocols designed to be more useful over intermittent and high-latency links such as those present in space.

    1. Re:Misleading title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not even that new. I can remember articles about devising this on /. ages ago. It is noteworthy, though, in that they've fleshed out the details and have now tested a working prototype.

  9. We are the Space Robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are here to protect you from the terrible secret of space.

  10. Exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For one thing, it would be quite a shocker to me to discover the ISS being without Internet access. For all we know, /. is trolled by astronauts daily.

    For another, who the heck wrote this summary?

    Latency... quantum entanglement, please take care of it!

  11. Deep Space Network? by bcong · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Deep Space Network? by bcong · · Score: 1

      Never mind it is probably this program: Disruption Tolerant Networking for Space Operations (DTN), http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/DTN.html

    2. Re:Deep Space Network? by rippeltippel · · Score: 1

      The article is correct, the DSN has just a couple of letters in common with DTN, and nothing to do with the Bundle Protocol.

      Delay/Disruption-Tolerant-Networks have been researched and developed by the DTN Research Group and the Bundle Protocol has been an RFC since 2007. It's possible to download an open-source reference implementation from SourceForge.

      Actually NASA also use their own protocol, called ION (Interplanetary Overlay Network).

  12. NASA, desperately trying to justify the ISS by Animats · · Score: 1

    Must be a slow month on the ISS. There's no reason that testing this should actually involve having someone in space operate a robot on the ground.

    1. Re:NASA, desperately trying to justify the ISS by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 1

      Well, it's probaby so that they can say that they tested the system with the same type of latency-lag that an Earth-ISSorbit / Earth-Space telcom link would have.
      Of course, they could have done the same demo with everything on Earth just by introducing the lag into the telcom lines anyway. But hey, it's talking to space! Just like all of the new fangled patents and inventions that say we'll do XXyyZZ on the internets as if changing the telcom medium really changes it. C'est la vie.

  13. Space-net - The Last Question by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 2

    The Last Question by Isaac Asimov © 1956
    From http://www.multivax.com/last_question.html

    The last question was asked for the first time, half in jest, on May 21, 2061, at a time
    when humanity first stepped into the light. The question came about as a result of a five
    dollar bet over highballs, and it happened this way:
    Alexander Adell and Bertram Lupov were two of the faithful attendants of Multivac. As
    well as any human beings could, they knew what lay behind the cold, clicking, flashing
    face -- miles and miles of face -- of that giant computer. They had at least a vague notion
    of the general plan of relays and circuits that had long since grown past the point where
    any single human could possibly have a firm grasp of the whole.
    Multivac was self-adjusting and self-correcting. It had to be, for nothing human could
    adjust and correct it quickly enough or even adequately enough -- so Adell and Lupov
    attended the monstrous giant only lightly and superficially, yet as well as any men could.
    They fed it data, adjusted questions to its needs and translated the answers that were
    issued. Certainly they, and all others like them, were fully entitled to share In the glory
    that was Multivac's.
    For decades, Multivac had helped design the ships and plot the trajectories that enabled
    man to reach the Moon, Mars, and Venus, but past that, Earth's poor resources could
    not support the ships. Too much energy was needed for the long trips. Earth exploited its
    coal and uranium with increasing efficiency, but there was only so much of both.
    But slowly Multivac learned enough to answer deeper questions more fundamentally,
    and on May 14, 2061, what had been theory, became fact.
    The energy of the sun was stored, converted, and utilized directly on a planet-wide
    scale. All Earth turned off its burning coal, its fissioning uranium, and flipped the switch
    that connected all of it to a small station, one mile in diameter, circling the Earth at half
    the distance of the Moon. All Earth ran by invisible beams of sunpower.
    Seven days had not sufficed to dim the glory of it and Adell and Lupov finally managed
    to escape from the public function, and to meet in quiet where no one would think of
    looking for them, in the deserted underground chambers, where portions of the mighty
    buried body of Multivac showed. Unattended, idling, sorting data with contented lazy
    clickings, Multivac, too, had earned its vacation and the boys appreciated that. They had
    no intention, originally, of disturbing it.
    They had brought a bottle with them, and their only concern at the moment was to relax
    in the company of each other and the bottle.
    "It's amazing when you think of it," said Adell. His broad face had lines of weariness in it,
    and he stirred his drink slowly with a glass rod, watching the cubes of ice slur clumsily
    about. "All the energy we can possibly ever use for free. Enough energy, if we wanted to
    draw on it, to melt all Earth into a big drop of impure liquid iron, and still never miss the
    energy so used. All the energy we could ever use, forever and forever and forever."
    Lupov cocked his head sideways. He had a trick of doing that when he wanted to be
    contrary, and he wanted to be contrary now, partly because he had had to carry the ice
    and glassware. "Not forever," he said.
    "Oh, hell, just about forever. Till the sun runs down, Bert."
    "That's not forever."
    "All right, then. Billions and billions of years. Twenty billion, maybe. Are you satisfied?"
    Lupov put his fingers through his thinning hair as though to reassure himself that some
    was still left and sipped gently at his own drink. "Twenty billion years isn't forever."
    "Will, it will last our time, won't it?"
    "So would the coal and uranium." "All right, but now we can hook up each individual spaceship to the Solar Station, and it
    can go to Pluto and back a million times without ever worrying about

  14. Internet3? by antdude · · Score: 1

    Internet2 is not even released to everywhere. :P

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  15. Oblig. xkcd by GJSchaller · · Score: 1
  16. Neuromancer by paleo2002 · · Score: 1

    Did NASA's space network immediately encounter an existing alien network and go mad?

  17. Background information on Delay Tolerant Networks by fuzzel · · Score: 1

    Related links for this article:
    DTN Research Group: http://www.dtnrg.org/wiki
    lots of docs: http://www.dtnrg.org/wiki/Docs
    overview presentation: http://jeroen.massar.ch/presentations/files/CCC2007-DTN-Upgrading-Martian-Carrier-Pigeons.ppt

    The book: http://www.amazon.com/dp/1596930632
    Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delay-tolerant_networking

    Source code: http://dtn.dsg.cs.tcd.ie/sft/ltplib/

    Oh and yes, theoretically this extends the Internet in the same way that various other protocols do, eg 6lowpan etc.
    And yes, as it is store-and-forward it looks an awful lot like SMTP.

    Enjoy ;)

  18. I don't understand why this is news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't get it. Remote control radio links have been used for decades. NASA itself has used radio to control their robots on Mars for quite a few years, and that has to deal with a time-delayed transmission due to distance. This is simply not news.