Slashdot Mirror


'Treasure Trove' In Oceans May Bring Revolutions In Medicine and Industry

dryriver sends this excerpt from the Guardian: "Scientists have pinpointed a new treasure trove in our oceans: micro-organisms that contain millions of previously unknown genes and thousands of new families of proteins. These tiny marine wonders offer a chance to exploit a vast pool of material that could be used to create innovative medicines, industrial solvents, chemical treatments and other processes, scientists say. Researchers have already created new enzymes for treating sewage and chemicals for making soaps from material they have found in ocean organisms. 'The potential for marine biotechnology is almost infinite,' says Curtis Suttle, professor of earth, ocean and atmospheric sciences at the University of British Columbia. 'It has become clear that most of the biological and genetic diversity on Earth is – by far – tied up in marine ecosystems, and in particular in their microbial components. By weight, more than 95% of all living organisms found in the oceans are microbial. This is an incredible resource.'"

15 of 107 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Industry? by haruchai · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because you can patent it, sell it and use the profits to buy off, er, make generous campaign contributions.

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  2. Almost infinite? by jomegat · · Score: 4, Funny

    What does "almost infinite" even mean?

    --

    In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice, they're not.

    1. Re:Almost infinite? by lessthan · · Score: 4, Funny

      Almost infinite means nearly limitless. Does that help?

      --
      Space Shuttle was a program that strapped humans to an explosion and tried to stab through the sky with fire and math
    2. Re:Almost infinite? by JWSmythe · · Score: 5, Interesting

          It means that we'll farm it to the edge of extinction, and then ponder what happened to them all... Kinda like...

      Hunting whales for blubber, and then wondering why there whales are almost extinct.

      Using pesticide on virtually everything, and then wondering why bees are dying off.

      Farming marginally arid land, and being surprised by the result.

      I'm not an environmentalist wingnut. Sometimes the answer to "what could possibly go wrong" is really obvious.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    3. Re:Almost infinite? by fm6 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I thoroughly agree with the point you're trying to make. But note that pesticides are not that strongly implicated in Colony Collapse Disorder. The problem is unknown in Australia, where pesticides are just as heavily used as anywhere else. It is extremely likely that it's due to some kind of environmental stress, which fits in with your abuse-of-resources theme.

  3. Not allowed! by cvtan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Too bad PETA will not allow us to exploit bacteria in this cruel manner. You have to ask their permission first. Individually.

    --
    Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
  4. Re:Industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You are entirely right! Industry prefers to have the government research it and then take the credit and profits for the research. Just like industry prefers to have small businesses take the risks and then steal the business and profit from them.

  5. Great! by fm6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We've used up all the fish. Now we can work on the smaller stuff!

    1. Re:Great! by Genda · · Score: 5, Funny

      Its krill or be krilled

  6. Yah, really? by TexVex · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm old enough to remember when the Rain Forest was the "treasure trove" of new medicines.

    Even then, the documentarians had the wit to point out that the main goal of researching all those new wonderful plant cures would be to figure out how they could create synthetic versions of nature's miracles and patent them.

    So, you know what? I don't give a shit. If somebody finds something revolutionary and decides to share it with humanity, then by all means please slap me around some and make sure I am aware of it. Because not even the invention of aspirin (developed from old common knowledge about the medicinal properties of willow bark) went without patent-related controversy.

    --
    Fun with Anagarams! LADS HOST, SHALT DOS. HAS DOLTS. AD SLOTHS, HATS SOLD. ASS HO, LTD.
    1. Re:Yah, really? by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A more recent example than asprin would be Taxol/Paclitaxel. Discovered in 1967 from the bark of the Pacific yew tree, and useful in treating cancer.

      Anyway, stories such as these are to inform if you're interested. News for nerds and all that. You don't give a shit, that's fine. No one was expecting you to get off your couch and start helping search for the cure for cancer as a result of this story. So go back to whatever it was you were doing. Maybe reading about apple suing samsung or something exciting like that. The biology community apologizes for this not being as interesting as you would hope. We'll get back to searching the ends of the earth for the cure to cancer. We probably won't bother slapping you around if we find anything useful though. Just maybe think about supporting funding for the NIH or cancer research. As miraculous as taxol is (saved my mother's life, breast cancer), the side effects are tough. You really want us searching the oceans and rainforests for better drugs before you develop cancer yourself.

  7. Re:Industry? by gagol · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cause outside the US most people are covered by a good public health care program?

    --
    Tomorrow is another day...
  8. Craig Venter also did this 2003-2006: GOSE by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 4, Informative
    Craig Venter also did this in the not-so-distant past after working on the Human Genome Project. It was called the Global Ocean Sampling Expedition (GOSE) which was an ocean exploration genome project.

    GOSE also aimed to trawl the bio-diversity of marine life in order to perform metagenomics analysis and find out about the diversity of marine genetic material. All of the data was put into UC-San-Diego's division of Cal-I-T2 (a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Institute_for_Telecommunications_and_Information_Technology>California Institute for Telecommunications and Information Technology

  9. Re:Death by Genda · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry guys, but you need to park that expanded self opinion someplace. Life on the planet is just fine. Hell, after the big asteroid hit, the earth was blasted, smothered, roasted, frozen, and left in the dark for month or years. Ten million years later an the diversity was extraordinary. We're the endangered species, and yeah we'll take out a slew of vertebrates with us.

  10. Re:Industry? by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Informative

    Maybe because it goes the other way in reality: the government funds the basic research, and then gives to private industries, often for next to nothing, who then sell it if it's profitable. Example: taxol.

    Look at it this way: most of the bragging about government achievements is done by politicians who signed off on it telling you why they should be re-elected or elected to higher offices. Big pharma spends way more on taking credit for medical breakthroughs (or just as often, trying to tell you something that's just repackaging is actually a medical breakthrough.) Who do you think gets credit in that tug of war? It's not the government-funded scientists either way.